Hates Big Tech, Buys SPACs?
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 02. 2022
- Why is Palantir hated by many legacy companies? I have some ideas.
Link to full debate: • Jonathan Haidt Debates...
Full Karp interview: • Palantir CEO Alex Karp...
Join the discussion: / discord - Věda a technologie
I don't think we'll know how genius Karp is until 10 years out. Maybe less. But he's living in a world where we can't even fathom yet. Thanks CodeStrap...can't wait for the work you have in mind to come to light. Also, can't wait for you to go balls deep in talking about this decentralized world of software...still can't fully comprehend it
I always get super excited when I see a new codestrap video. Gonna pour a nice glass of bourbon and get ready for greatness
Codestrap is Palantir God
I get so much value in your sub 20 min videos than most others on the internet. Thank you my friend!
This channel is extremely under rated
Always pumping out Great content Thank you
That was an amazing Palantir video. I have so much respect for Dr. Karp. Now more than ever the bets that Palantir have made a long time ago about the kind of world we need to be prepared for and what would be necessary are looking clairvoyant. The world needs Palantir now more than ever. I don’t know obviously, but I hope they are helping to fight against Russia now in Ukraine. If so I hope they are helping to save lives, and if necessary end them. 2200 shares long and adding every 2 weeks. Be the thing the world needs, PLTR.
Great job ! Thank you for all the work you have been doing, I am a integration and data architect, I definitely see your points and visions
Great video Codestrap. Pumped for the future!
Keep it up Codestrap. We need this to get out, and change the status quo
Thanks for making this video buddy, In tech and Silicon Valley, this topic is almost taboo to discuss
Damn CodeStrap, this video makes me want the change the world… and stuff. Great video👍
Thanks for another informative video and an angle I hadn’t thought about.
Always great videos, thank you.
You help me so much with understanding palantir. My conviction grows everytime
Amazing piece of content- the clip with the gentleman speaking about social media is eye-opening- thank you for that. One small comment- and you can take it or leave it- but, the canned patriotic music you speak over…. maybe consider not using it. Forgive me, but I always find it to be cliche and odd- unnecessary at best when people use that weird soundtrack in inspirational clips. You talking over pure silence has worked up until now. That said- keep up the good work, sir +
Another great Video. Thank you!
Awesome channel and great content on Palantir.
I really enjoy the developer community idea, though I don't understand all the specific layers and integration. I wonder if more traditional sales channel model could add to Palantir reaching more SMBs
I've found that this dynamics of walking on eggshells and watching what you say in university is especially present in the anglosphere (USA, Canada, UK, Australia) which is plagued by those ideas. It is entering other universities, but at a slower rate (even if social media is equally consumed).
On another note, have you seen Karp participation in the Munich Security Conference? Very insightful and it felt like Karp is pretty at ease with addressing the concerns of regulators around data (like when he was questionned by Kenneth Roth from the Human Rights Watch)
Yep. I'm actually calling that the executive recruiting tour. He's at ease because their platform is future proof IMO.
Do you have a link to that question by Roth? Thanks!
@@oshauky Sure, I'll get it for you.
@@oshauky There you go: czcams.com/video/d1XiIBiRSQ8/video.html
And Karp rightfully points out to Ken Roth that Palantir doesn't own the data. But you can see that this belief still persists
Also, the question you mentioned and the response. First, Roth doesn't understand the way PLTR processes data, the nuance around data ownership and governance, and the different business models of tech companies. But its not essential for the point hes making. I think ultimately this comes down to oversight, which Karp welcomes, at least outside the counter terrorism space. But both in the technical solution that provides strong guarantees built into the system, which decentralization can solve, and central authorities enforcing law. Theres so much to unpack in his response though it deserves a proper conversation.
Ready to see how to get involved with Palantir as a developer
The last part of the video gave me goosebumps. I really think this is the beginning of a new (better) world right now
This video was a truly excellent watch
Great content ty
Looking forward to it
great video thanks
Will you be buying more this week?
I read Haidt because of your recommendation...
Sweet Code!✌️✌️✌️
Incredibly proud to own and hold this stock
Always found ur videos to be very insightful. But.. for this video i can't seem to get the connection. First part on the presentation abt global issue on mental health then to Alex Karp investing on these start up or innovative companies as part of Palantir's system for decentralisation.
How does this correlate to SPAC? Isn't SPAC companies w/o real operations ?
Theres a lot to unpack here. Decentralization has a ton of layers including distributed data, homogeneous compute abstracted from the underlying cloud provider, edge AI, consensus algorithms, data privacy and a lot more. In this video I want to focus on the data privacy issue. Karp recognizes the threat we face from social media. His comments are supported by Hait's research. How do you solve that problem though when the issue is the underlying business model? Build a platform where the user owns their data and it can't be used to drive engagement. Thats a decentralized model that forces the developer to deliver actual value instead of extracting the value from the user. In this regard PLTR serves as the capitol allocator for the next generation of developers who will commit to solving this problem. They also have the software required to understand a dissagregated data landscape, and deliver value to it. In the interview clip Karp openly states that they have to build the relationships to find the individuals who share thier vision for this new generation of decentralized products that will be built on Foundry. Its my opinion those SPAC investments and the Foundry for Builders program are the mechanism to build those relationships. Why fight losing battles with people clinging to legacy software if you can just invest in the people you don't need to convince and put everyone else out of business? That's the connection. Build the future on Foundry with ethical use of ML/AI in a world that will desperately need it to cope with huge disruptions, one of which are platforms where the user is the product.
@@codestrap8031 Thank you for going into great details. I think I was really confused with the definition of SPACs because when referring to Google for it's definiton. SPACs meant shell company w/o real operations. However in your case, SPACs seems to be the innovative start ups that doesn't mind to be part of big tech companies like Palantir.
I'm pretty sure all the companies the invested in were SPACs. There's a ton of analysis out there on whether that was the right strategy because the SPAC market generally is getting destroyed right now. So just using it as a stand in for: The SPACs PLTR invested in.
No question that we have lots of problems. But I don't see how the final few minutes of the video have anything to do with those problems. Perhaps it will become clear to me later.
Theres a lot to unpack here. Decentralization has a ton of layers including distributed data, homogeneous compute abstracted from the underlying cloud provider, edge AI, consensus algorithms, data privacy and a lot more. In this video I want to focus on the data privacy issue. Karp recognizes the threat we face from social media. His comments are supported by Hait's research. How do you solve that problem though when the issue is the underlying business model? Build a platform where the user owns their data and it can't be used to drive engagement. Thats a decentralized model that forces the developer to deliver actual value instead of extracting the value from the user. In this regard PLTR serves as the capitol allocator for the next generation of developers who will commit to solving this problem. They also have the software required to understand a dissagregated data landscape, and deliver value to it. In the interview clip Karp openly states that they have to build the relationships to find the individuals who share thier vision for this new generation of decentralized products that will be built on Foundry. Its my opinion those SPAC investments and the Foundry for Builders program are the mechanism to build those relationships. Why fight losing battles with people clinging to legacy software if you can just invest in the people you don't need to convince and put everyone else out of business? That's the connection. Build the future on Foundry with ethical use of ML/AI in a world that will desperately need it to cope with huge disruptions, one of which are platforms where the user is the product.
Fundamentally is social media really the cause of these problems?
Social media has added so much value to soceity, that i could not possible see my life living without it.
But what is causing this huge impact on society, is that social media is engineered to be addicting.
And why is it engineered to be addicting, because companies want to have consumers spend the most time possible on their platform.
By doing this they can monetize the time spent and show growth and keep the share price rising.
This fundamental concept has led to:
- people swiping mindlessly
- people watching video's instead of being productive
- Games being designed with addictive loops (Call of Duty)
- Lootboxes being sold in games and making kids addicted to gambling
And this concept of showing growth and keeping share prices rising has have other impacts on the world:
- The meat industry
- Child labor
- Global warming
social media really isn't the biggest evil out there and is not the root cause of these problems.
I would say you actually have to address Haidt's research. I don't believe, if you are honest with yourself, there is another plausible explanation. If you are into this topic be sure to checkout the full debate linked in the description. The Q&A portion is awesome and dives into all these questions. Haidt still comes out on top moving more people towards his position.
@@codestrap8031 i'll have a look into it. Thanks for the recommendation.
🔥🔥🔥
God damn it seems like Palantir really lets Karp see the future hahaha, he kind of reminds me of a character from the Lord of the Rings.
Excellent video. $pltr 🚀 also wondering if you’re interested in any crypto projects? Are you familiar with hbar?
I like IOHK and thier vision for identity management with Atala Prism. Digital identity is the most essential problem to solve. I also like they chose a DSL for Cardano's smart contracts.
@@codestrap8031 that sounds super interesting! About to go research them lol. Appreciate the knowledge codestrap
I tried to have a civil discussion on politics last night on twitter with what I thought were adults. Without any provocation, insults or even implied insults on my part I was called an idiot and talked down to by at least 3 people who disagreed with me. People don't even want to discuss anything anymore its join the mob or stfu.
I'd encourage anyone watching this to also watch the Lex Fridman interview of Mark Zuckerberg if you're interested in the subject of social media
I tried watching the full interview with Karp. Something is off.. he's too wordy, using too many big words, with what seems like the intent to sound smart, but often the ideas just felt flat. I went to the comments to see what others where saying but the comments were turned off.. seems a bit odd.
They are always turn off. It’s not meant to be a discussion board and I’m guessing because they don’t want their message to be taken hostage with vitriol.