Worker Nightingale 2.0 Overview

This may be Worker's first flop. While viable as a low power secondary, it doesn't seem to have any edge up on the 1.0, other than aesthetics.
What do you think of the Nightingale 2.0

[@bronxrob1552]

I like the way it looks

[@connorlew785]

The 2.0 is supposed to be for 4s lipo

[@spideravengermiller3920]

I thought it was gonna be a lot smaller this seems a little big for a side arm but I do like the front end more than the original great overview

[@lipoz-n-nitroz4012]

Can we please have more information on the blaster located on the left side of the screen, second from the bottom? Looks like an M249ish blaster?

[@trash4491]

Got my 2.0 around week a ago. Meh, I don’t expect a big jump of perfomance than 1.0, I just want my 2.0. And, it first 2.0 gale in Russia!

[@DartDynasty]

I heard that these have been holding up horribly lately. A lot of fried electronics, broken motors, etc... Idk how Worker messed up so badly on these. Its almost like they made them without testing. Dont get me wrong though, the Harrier and the Seagull and by far the best they have made. If they can somehow make a nerf blaster the size of an HC Diana or something like that (with 180-200 fps), flywheel, then I think worker would for sure exceed in the hobby.

[@XxMurvayxX]

You hear that from who? The one other video on CZcams? I pre ordered mine, and it came the day these 2 videos came out.

[@DartDynasty]

@@XxMurvayxX Okay but theres also reddit and facebook posts. What are your opinions. From the looks of it, its just a nightingale with metal pieces on it to make it look cooler.

[@XxMurvayxX]

Well I pre-ordered mine, I’ve put probably 300 darts through it, and my only complaint is that it’s loud af. It’s more streamline than the 1.0, and pretty light if you remove the rails, but I like the rails, they make it feel very premium.

[@DartDynasty]

@@XxMurvayxX Hows the performance? Is it the same as the old nightingale? I mean the FPS is the same from what I can tell but what about the accuracy? I was thinking of buying one but all these youtube videos are making me think twice. I mean, is it worth paying 40$ for this one?

[@XxMurvayxX]

I can’t personally compare to the 1.0, I only have the 2.0, but I’ll say it’s not as accurate as I was hoping, but I primarily use springers with a bcar.

[@brandoncollins9039]

Standard short darts you can't use heavyweight or light it will affect performance

[@milosmods]

I was watching another reviewer and his Nightingale 2.0 blew up on camera

[@kurtiskeys483]

Thanks you for the review. I will now not be getting one if the 4s lipo makes it worse.

[@sweetlikechocothai]

I bought a 1.0 and sold it a few months later. It’s so ignorantly high pitch that I personally hated using it. Also using a 3S to get such low FPS seemed wrong. I bought a Phoenix 2.0. It’s faster and in lower pitched. Although it chews up darts pretty bad.

[@Mechpilot0790]

Do you think using something like dartzone rubies with 2mm trimmed off the back would survive the Phoenix chewing issue?

[@sweetlikechocothai]

I’ve tried 7 different short darts. Rubies seem to be the best for durability so far. Why would cutting 2mm help?

[@Mechpilot0790]

@@sweetlikechocothai I keep hearing that worker half-lengths were all shortened when the nightingale from the standard 37mm length to 35 in order to make smaller angled mags to fit inside a more comfortable pistol grip, I'm not sure yet, I have to do some testing

[@sweetlikechocothai]

@@Mechpilot0790 mine all fit in a nightingale mag. I think the rubies are slightly shorter.

[@abelq8008]

I was hoping this would rock so 1.0s versions would go on sale lol

[@justinmorris2199]

It comes across as a sidestep at best, I don't see enough improvement to call it a step up by any stretch

[@danielalbertsen1110]

A dark gray seagull and harrier would be awesome.

[@Rouge256]

I really hope they come out with a 2.0 version of both of those so the originals go on sale lol

[@boomer7784]

One stupid blaster
Big L from Worker