Caller agrees with Lee Anderson's take that 'Islamists are in control of London' | LBC debate
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 02. 2024
- Lee Anderson, the former deputy chairman of the Conservatives, has been suspended from the party after claiming that Sadiq Khan was controlled by Islamists.
In this clip, Sangita Myska debates with caller Mark who concurs with Lee Anderson's comments that 'Islamists are in control of London'.
Listen to the full show on Global Player: app.af.globalplayer.com/Br0x/...
#sangitamyska #leeanderson #sadiqkhan #politics #LBC
LBC is the home of live debate around news and current affairs in the UK.
Join in the conversation and listen at www.lbc.co.uk/
Sign up to LBC’s weekly newsletter here: l-bc.co/signup
You can see the contempt she has for the caller lol
tbf, he invited it on himself.
She is not alone
You get frustrated when you have to deal with prejudice people. His statements are so subjective to him and certain groups of people who want to say these people are bad because we say they are bad. The idea the police (right wing officers) said that they were afraid of public opinion is a load of bull for them not doing their job you know its bull because it never stopped them before...why now.
@@Nick-kb6jd yeah who turn a blind eye to Islamist extremists because a significant number are anti semetic , ask medhi hasan 😂
The caller is a bigot.
Should Humza Yousaf be fired for his "too white, white white comment or is there a double standard again like our police force
Loool what?
Double standards obviously
He will be out of a job at the next election anyway
YES!!!
What's it got to do with this?
That didn't happen. Then she confirms it happened 😂
The Prophet said, "Isn't the witness of a women equal to half that of a man?" The women said "yes". He said "This is because of the deficiency of the women's mind." Sahih Bukhari 3:48:826
The dude got humiliated 😂😂😂😂
Moral of the call : “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging”
Well well well look who it is
How is Simon Webb these days., still stork in him...
@@vincentblack7467 At least Simon is honest unlike Sagnitya if that even is her real name
@@Jamie-uk2zh YOU SPEAK WITH A FORKED TONGUE.
@@charanjitsidhu4733 And sagnitya aswell as Khan doesnt? get off your high horse or should I say trojan horse.
I personally knoew 100% that the police don't uphold laws when it suits.
They are scared of a radicalised muslim mob, they need to be honest like Starmer. The protestors know this. The white lefty protestors want to pretend its not happening.
Of cause they don’t.If they did many politicians would be locked up an already. Along with post office officials. So your point is.
She's a liar, Burnham admitted on stage fear of racism as a reason for doing nothing. That came from his mouth directly.
you knoew?
Jimmy Savile police always pick and choose
The moment Sangita saw his previous call on the screen and had the transcript was the best bit for me! These people don't even realise their words are all recorded.
The best bit was when she refused to acknowledge Aisha was 6
@@isaiah537 Aisha was not 6, she was atleast 17 to 19 actually.
@@zzsmile1
'Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of SIX YEARS of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.' Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236
*6*
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was SIX YEARS old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64
*6*
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was SIX YEARS old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old. Sahih Muslim 8:3310
*6*
@@isaiah537doesn’t the Bible condone slavery? (Hint: It does)
@bmxney3143Yeah they're both wrong. What's your point?
This is what happens after 40 years underinvestment in state education😂😂😂what a muppet the caller was -he had no evidence -couldn’t answer any of the question .
O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people. Quran 5:51
How about the teacher in Batley who is in hiding because of violent Islamists then?
Wow Batley must be very very north London. Just past Cockfosters?
That's not Islamism though. Is it?
its pacificsm
I doubt if Sadiq Khsn has anything to fo either that!
Yes, it is.@@DavidHeffron78
Sangita is so rude and arrogant and also in denial. She fails to give this man a chance to put his views across interrupting him at every opportunity. Why bother letting people ring in. This is just a platform for her views.
She was polite and easily destroyed him.
She gave him multiple chances 😅 are you ok?
The man's an incredible, smooth brain
@@kaystar1844 you know very well he isn't ok. I've seen dry slices of bread beyond the expiration date with more fresh arguments.
She’s awesome ❤
Tories have a serious problem with racism and Islamaphobia
You're so right. They need to be more wary of the violent Islamic lobby.
Labour has a problem with antisemitism
So does Labour
@@notknown6605 Labour doesn't have that anymore. You're stuck in the 90s. They have a new MP's.
How so?
This chant: "from the river to the sea" is also in the zionists chart.... look for it
She asks him a question and doesn't let him answer the question, but interrupts him with a rant.
Bcse he was telling lies and nonsense..
I couldn’t agree more, she is so annoying and obviously biased to the left.
Isn't she just great!
Gotta luv her 😊
She scored points by putting down a caller. Noone is being wise here
She does not want to hear the truth !
Thank you sangita for projecting objectivity in these troubling timesand challenging the widespread misinformation and distortion of truth.
These people call and just rattle off their prejudices with no factual basis.
I love that they forget the prosecutor who put away the Rochdale gang was Pakistani British.
He’s not gonna get anywhere with this one,it’s plain to see what’s going on in London to anyone with there eyes open.
Please enlighten us?
Ooh - do tell.
Did you take a walk on London bridge on Saturday night ? Of course not, if you had, you wouldn't need to be enlightened.🤦
@@tonywilson8681 keep those blinkers on ....🙈
@@williamdew7143 yes you are just another one.... spec saviors may help!😂
The grooming gangs are still in operation in Rotherham and every town and city in the country
How do you know that and prove that
The police and social security have admitted it's true after my daughter was groomed. And we're from the upper middle classes.@@paulneedham3608
theyre on eipstien Island the last I heard
How do you know and the police don't 😂😂
@@unknownguy0161 the police do know. It’s rife according to all professionals in the know.
The most common saying in this country is "They are taking over".....
And it's true.
@@hunkyhaggis2161 Can you explain how it's true?
After being invited over to do jobs they cba'd doing lol. Look at the recent influx of nigerian and indian nurses. These callers no doubt love their NHS but struggle to work in it!
This interviewer is nothing but a bully who takes delight in humiliation off the caller. It's easy for her when there's a team doing her research and feeding her questions to ask.
It would have been nice to actually hear the guys point of view ,I don't know why people phone these shows ,it's bordering semantics if it wasn't so serious.
They need to interrupt him and derail the discussion if he goes off-piste.
His point of view was all you heard. She was spot on. Hate and hateful comments cause problems. He had no leg to stand on.
He had no point, its pure conflation. He got ripped up lol debate jihad almost
@@essem123 so it's not a point of view to care for your culture and want what's best for it.
@@guardian100 if you defend it with misrepresentation and untruths, yes. That’s a falsehood, not a point of view
Regards the Rotherham grooming scandle, this dispute can be settled by publishing a spreadsheet listing all the gromminhg offenders caught, stating their nationality / ethnicity and religion. Then if the allegations are not true, it will be plain to see. All the reports so far appear to be very wordy but completely lacking in any rogorous data.
As far as data analysis goes defining grooming gang its too broad a term. So the data wouldn’t tell you anything and data scientists probably wouldnt be agree on a definition.
Surely the best thing to do would be list the religion and race of every crime committed in the country. I’m sure this would show how they’re all done by extremists. Like remember that time when the media would tell us of that white Christian male who committed a crime…o wait🤔
You can look at crime statistics anytime you want ffs 🤦🏽♂️😂
@@whackeryounis
Hmm.... Did you miss Jimmy Savile? Or the endless reports of Catholic and Protestant priests/vicars and what they got up to?
Jersey care homes? The list goes on.
And that would be great to discuss but it still doesn't make the statement Lee Anderson made anything other than defamatory
She corrected him firmly by repeating what he said
The evidence being on film when 2 officers arrest an old man for carrying the union Jack and asked why they don't arrest some demonstrators their answer was there's more of them than us.
and the number of times that has happened and the number of years it has been happening for
A Police force with 'No Fear Or Favour' I don't believe so.
How patronising and condescending she is
They're just proving Lee Anderson right 🤷 You can't say anything that's less than adoring and worshipful of these groups without being condemned.
…and you can eat a nutritious meal for 30p. Also, the people he videos himself canvassing aren’t his friends at all. Yes, honest Lee is always right.
Correct.
Of course you can say stuff, if he just said there is a problem with Islamic extremists in this country, he wouldn't have been suspended, he made out that the mayor of London was in the pockets of extremists, based on nothing more than race = racism
@@josslevy4240
Salman Rushdie thinks Anderson is right
@@josslevy4240In this case, he's absolutely correct. You have a metropolitan elite of liberals who refuse to acknowledge any social tensions caused by the importation of these anti-Western elements and instead blame everything on "racism". Why do you think they're losing credibility and people are turning to populists who aren't afraid to speak their minds?
I just love it when someone has a strong view for an argument they're not prepared to have
It’s quite easy we have an Islamist problem when you see what happening in pro Palestine marches , David Amis killed and another Tory mp threatened with homophobic and anti semetic comments he had to stand down from his role , look the other at lefty 😂
You're talking about this woman, right? She knows absolutely nothing about what happened in Rotherham 😂
So Islamism is not an issue in uk 😂😂 Sangita does get her callers selected , lobe to have an actual Debate with say Douglas Murray 😂
@@Peacefulpreface6323 I see, you interviewed the social workers involved more than she did?
@rebeccas6323 this Woman has actually interviewed the social workers that didn't report the abuse. She knows waaaaaay better than you do.
If you dont want somebody to make a point,interupt and redirect.
There’s something that we can’t underestimate, the power of street wise, someone that sits in the office, doesn’t know what happens in the streets, something I admire when I came here were the patriotism of English people, they love their country
I"I think killer bees are bad..."
"Wait a minute honey is my special subject! "
🤣🤣 i hope to use this statement in a argument one day
A smiling little vampire 🧛♀️
Anyone considering decades of police funding cuts may have something to do with poor policing. Poor politicians are leading this country by example.
They've got plenty of time to arrest people for tweets they don't agree with, so saying cuts are to blame, is naive and ridiculous.
@@ytsm you appear to be suffering from myopic memory. To suggest that they have time to arrest people for publishing adverse comments/tweets etc. is the actual naivety at play here. The ridiculousness is having to respond to such projected naiveté in the first place.
t's intriguing that those who support this caller struggle with grammar. Their capability to construct strong arguments through reasoning and critical thinking is already flawed 😂
While the callers are sometimes really hapless, I admire their courage for calling. After all, they know how often others are humiliated by Sangitha.
She plays on words and twists them so suit her. She's vile
@@anthonysmith7014 Arrogant and ignorant egos do get humiliated by that. All they know are the opinions they've been fed based on distortions of facts and cherry-picking to fit an agenda. There is truth though that both sides of political belief systems have agendas, and these two extremes have been getting used and stirred up by the media and politicians so massively via the internet that it's almost completely co-opted the whole of society into a largely manufactured drama. The internet has completely changed everything and made all the problems we already had in society about a hundred times worse than ever before. We have access to so much information constantly now that instead of everyone becoming really wise and intelligent, the vast majority of people are just being royally fooled and profoundly confused about almost everything. The endless and increasingly vapid and artless entertainment industries are pumping out vast quantities of brain "content" like never before and people are therefore able to lose themselves so much in all that, they don't have any incentive to really face life properly anyway - especially considering most folk are so bogged down working their lives away, how can you even blame them for not having anywhere near enough energy and vitality to confront and do anything about all this increasingly complex and overwhelming world?
@@anthonysmith7014100% with you. Are you Swiss?
@@dawnbrown9167 Plays on words? As in using the English language as it should be used and asking questions of the callers?
She has been trained to debate. Training that the ordinary man/woman does not have.
She isn't any more right than the caller here - just better at debating than he was.
If there's ever an unbearable presenter who doesn't represent the people of this country, then it's this lady right here.
A certain teacher in batley comes to mind that had to flee for his life in a secret location, the only difference between these two are she has learned over years on how to talk over others and try to belittle, the lad just isn't articulate enough to get his point across , if she was to debate maajid nawaz she would get a lesson
Yep!... Plus the guy who held up a sign saying Hama's are terrorist and was attacked by protesters - what happened to him - oh the police moved him on and and told him to remove his sign 🤦
If she debated me she'd be sorry.She is a Mslm sympathiser.Its so obvious!
Why didn't Majid Na waz phone then?
She was brilliant In this interview. Stuttering and lying he sounded like an idiot. Without evidence you can't spread lies. She annihilated him what a tool 😂
Or Douglas Murray or Tommy Robinson…
Sangita… it’s pretty obvious that you are not impartial. You take the analysis of written statements over the obvious.
For instance, you can argue math and science, place words to describe and mock explanations… however, it’s pretty obvious when a square peg won’t fit into a round hole!
She’s not working for the bbc. She doesn’t have to be impartial.
‘Those terrorist attacks were condemned by everybody’ - well that’s not true. Hibz ut-Tahrir openly celebrated them, including calling the 9/11 bombers the ‘Magnificent 19’. They were then allowed to protest with antisemitic banners outside parliament, while their leader practiced as a GP within the NHS.
mate smell the flowers and look at the mountrain and feel the breeze on ur face!! ur totally brainwashed by mainstream media!!
That must be true because you said it.
What do you call anti-Semitic banners?...
@@MPZambrano1977 ‘Muslim armies march on Israel’ ‘Glory the Al Aqsa Flood’ etc etc etc
You do know when people say "everybody" they don't LITERALLY mean everybody? She's not going to say "everyone but so and so "
The "TROJAN HORSE" case Birmingham might be contentious but findings were backed by evidence to have had real concerns of Muslim censorship (& other forms of religeous manipulation) used in the school cirriculum.
That would be an interesting discussion to have but it doesn't change the facts. Lee Anderson has made a statement about Saddiq Khan that's easily proven to be false. He's opened himself up to being sued for defamation (and rightly so). P.S. I don't even like Saddiq Khan but Lee was wrong and should face the consequences. And if the roles were reversed I'd hold the same opinion because facts matter (whether you're on the left or the right)
That was proven to be bs
Trojan horse turned out to be a total farce
Shocking that 56 people liked your comment when it is b.s! This is why democracy is a joke. When the majority of the population is misinformed and so arrogant to their ignorance, you need to ditch democracy.
@@MakH-bu8zq It didn't though. The report states it could not be defined technically as a 'conspiracy' but there were also genuine 'areas of concern'. Even the US podcast anti-'Trojan Horse' ,also making the news, that came after, comes with the same contradictory information. That's if you read BOTH sides of the story.
some were FRIGHTENED. Yes the ones that were supposed to be doing there job were FRIGHTENED to open their mouth because of the consequences. She should be sacked.
Yes thise involved were threaten by Mslms and their families threatened as well.I know that for a fact!
They run the local council. Half the councillors in Rochdale etc.
If she kept Quiet the guy could answer.
If she kept quiet, this idiot would just have spouted more of his lies. She pointed out where he was incorrect and invited him to clarify. The fact that he was unable to back-up his arguments, tells you all you need to know about his case.
“Do you agree with Anderson’s Islamophobic comments?” Talk about a leading question! EDIT- Yes, I should have said ‘loaded’, not ‘leading’. I’ve really enjoyed the debate btw
😂 Yeah, but do you condemn Hamas? 😅
It's a radio fone-in not a court of law!
Your comment would only make sense if the caller had said "No, of course not. I'm not Islamophobic!"
@@jonathonjubb6626 sure, they say that in court a lot. Not sure what your point is. An underhanded tactic is an underhanded tactic, wherever it occurs, and she’s above things like this
Because it objectively is Islamaphobic. You think Anderson would've said the same if the current mayor of London was White? Or a Conservative for that matter.
This is horrific. This is t presenting, this isn’t journalism. This is a mouthpiece defending a stance. The people producing this pulled up this man’s former call in an attempt to slander him. Fed it to the presenter for their gotcha moment and missed. LBC bosses need to look at this as a very problematic way of running a show.
Or, you could just not watch?
It not about watching her it's too see what propaganda she is putting out
@@km-ug2cu wow- that's super dramatic....relax. Again, go watch Sky or GB or any of the numerous far right wing outlets - they'll tell you what you want to hear and you'll be able to call it 'facts' and not 'propoganda'.
Bet you don't complain about GB NEWS😅
@@ptv8113being kind of hypocritical there mate
25 years ago I would never have envisaged this kind of conversation taking place. GB has changed hugely. We now have many many people who are "enriching" our culture and values with their diverse cultural, political and religious values. I have to ask myself what bit of their culture and religion has actually enhanced our way of life ?
So if the police can't deal with football fans (hooligans), what is the problem?
This woman is not fit for her job ...
The fact that we can't have Xmas trees in schools anymore for the fear of upsetting others shows its got out of hand.
"CaN't EvEn sAy MeRrY ChRiStMaS aNyMoRe"
Budget cuts, i worked in schools they dont have funding for any stationary let alone xmas tree. Before you jump the gun, ask the education secretary to give more money.
You believe that lie? I bet you blame immigration for the state of our country too.
Well that's completely made up. My son's school is extremely multicultural and it had a tree in nearly every classroom.
won't be long before you can't get a poppy to pin on your jacket because of the connection with Afghanistan
6:00 I refute Sangita's claim that London is the financial capital of the world; London comes second place to New York. I know it's only minor, but when bringing facts to an argument it's important to have them straight.
You are wrong; London _is_ the financial capital of the world. It's the _only_ thing she got right here.
Just because Mark doesn't believe that the Government sold the UK out to the Caliphate doesn't prove that she was correct.
Lee Anderson needs to stand for London Mayor role.
And it’d be the worst defeat any candidate has ever suffered. He’s a joke, soon to be found mugging himself off at whatever skip fire ukip is calling itself these days.
Moreover London has become Stabcity under Khan lousy leadership and the Tories has exercised zero control over UK southern border whilst LBC tells us of all the wonderful doctors, engineers etc that come in illegally. Thing is we don’t all agree with this!
knife crime has gone down under khan compared to when johnson was mayor mate. dont be a mouthpiece for lies.
London is officially 'Stabcity UK'. You may think it is wonderful and to paraphrase Bobby Brown, that's your prerogative@@thegil-martingetaway8804
I believe Birmingham has the highest rate of knife crime in England. I guess you’re still sore about Ulez.
The burden of proof falls on the individual making the claim, but this caller seems to think it is the other way round 😂😂😂. I can't believe I have to share the world with people who are so devoid of any common sense and will perform all kinds of mental gymnastics to support their racism while avoiding the real questions.
She is quite selective with her callers 😂 the proof is we have had a Tory mp killed , another having to step down because of threats over Israel and numerous labour mps being threatened by Islamists if they didn’t vote the right way regarding Gaza , don’t be blind in your left eye 😂
There's an astonishing number of these pillocks in the comments too. It's actually quite shocking how many of these people seem to think it's "guilty until proven innocent" not the correct "innocent until proven guilty".
Not to mention how many of them conflate "hearing" or "being told" something is happening as it ACTUALLY happening.
They desperately want any excuse to rile up hate against groups they don’t like, and when anyone calls them out on their BS they change the subject to another lie.
Although both interviews and interrogations seek information, an interview is a more informal procedure, while an interrogation involves formally questioning a person who has information about an alleged crime.
Interrogatories are a discovery tool that parties can use to receive answers to specific questions about a case before trial.
This is not a debate and Mark, the radio listener, did not commit any crime.
Samgita Myska interrogated Mark, as if he were a criminal.
Of course Mark is a criminal! He is guilty of wrongthink and wrongthink cannot go unpunished.
He is a criminal..😂 criminal stutterer
Just look at London just look at birmingham just look at Bradford 😂
It’s clear that callers are clearly vetted before they get through to Sangita, this was a prime case of it.
Explain.
They're not vetted that well they ask you what questiok you're gonna put forward and then put you on the line. The "vetting" takes literally 8 seconds
She ran rings round him with the help of her studio, producer and ego...
LBC is pure pantomime, a total sham of a broadcaster. Low hanging fruit only.
@@UkOutreach LBC select callers who will either have a heartwarming story, or will disagree with the host. They do this on all their shows from what I can see. I'm not sure what the OP's point is though.
His "evidence" is 'I feel like it's true, so it's true.'
She doesn’t let the guy talk
Are you sure? He gave him ample opportunities but he’s too thick to answer.
It's astonishing how these ignorant people are whipped up by some politicians and these people are clueless.
Walk into any UK urban centre in 2024 and tell me the native population isn’t being replaced.
You mean the Celts? Kinda too late for that love.....
What is the 'native' population? How can you tell who is born in UK?
Indeed its being replaced by people fleeing the war in Ukraine. I do hope they are welcomed and shown the same love that you would show to anyone seeking refuge in the UK.
Oh no! The great replacement conspiracy theory is real!! 😱
@@kevinsmarts9953Why didn't the Ukrainians take their own people in? The country is huge and the vast majority of it is largely untouched by the war.
Appalling interviewer.
Why is this presenter smirking and belittling this caller.
Because he's utterly clueless and is unaware that he has no reasons for his opinions.
She is the cocky arrogant speaker on lbc .
She won't let him speak and deflects his question. Did she not see what happened in Parliment.
Accusing without facts is unbecoming of a gentleman. Only the vile do that.
She shut him up what a tool he is. Stuttering trouble maker he is. No evidence no evidence just call names when you feel like. She absolutely was spot on. Urgh he is horrible imagine there are people like him living near to you.
What are you talking about? she asked the questions, let him answer it, and also she let him explain what he thinks.
Sangitha: It's not illegal
Sangitha: Somebody has been arrested for that.
She must be outraged that someone has been arrested for doing something that is not illegal.
What report would anyone believe. Teachers with death threats. What planet is this woman from.
I’m not a fan of Sangita’s interviewing style (regardless of the topic). Doesn’t listen to the caller’s opinion, condescends and laughs throughout. Laughing and putting your hands over your face constantly doesn’t do her or the debate any favours.
What opinion 😂😂😂😂 The guy is repeating what he saw on Facebook
@@diegolove173rightly so
She literally gives them the opportunity to talk and then asks them to provide the evidence for their opinions. That’s how proper argument work.
Your opinion on any subject should be based on whatever available facts there may be, if you can’t back up an opposing argument then it’s just something you think incorrectly.
The guy has no idea what he’s talking about and she’s just proving that by asking him the right questions and exposing his ignorance.
Host is a disgrace
Atleast she is talking about reality.
His answer to every question she put to him should've been " not yet "
When she was asking about if certain powerful people were islamists, notice she didn't mention anything about the Scottish first minister
@@ozricaurora- Which has exactly what to do with the claim that the London mayor has given control of the capital city away to Islamist Extremists?
Lee A is just being honest .
What is it with LBC hosts? Argumentative, Arrogant, Condescending, Headwobblig, Looking down individuals intent only on preventing the caller from makinging their point
Many callers don't HAVE a point. Some have zero evidence and are therefore just sharing opinions with nothing whatsoever to base them on
He didn't have a point evidently
Look at her laughing at him before he’s hardly begun talking.
Because he has called in before and would have been fully prepared of this guys waffle!
So was I...
why is she so rude? you can argue the point without being so rude.
Has Sanghita ever picked up a Quran or read the Hadiths?
why? have you
The police were told to not investigate the Muslim rapes, as it would cause tensions in the Pakistsni community . Ask Gordon Brown... the PM at the time.
Ah yes, this must be true because you said it is.
It’s true because my Aunts second cousin told me
Not true at all. Police were not afraid. You obviously believe the rumours spread by the likes of Tommy Robinson.
Even if your statement is true how do islamists control the country, London or Sadiq Khan?
@@Gohka it is , what happened to David Amis and Mike freer ?
Sangita is behaving like an ostrich, who digs her head in the sand 😅
She lives in a nice, white middle class area no doubt.
@@paddyanglais91 What's got to do with anything except maybe your jealousy
@@Sirlarrythecat no jealousy here, just noticing a pattern with those so keen to defend a religion quite clearly at odds with their own lifestyle
Obvious who she's protecting
We westerners don’t have a problem criticising our own but look at her as an example, she will twist and turn every word and deny any evidence and corner a simple caller with her journalistic wisely words. Just like Baroness Warsi. She would rather be on the side of Sadiq Kahn than her own party but instead suggested Suella Braverman should leave the Tory party. What a piece of work!
"Simple caller" is right.
@@allanmckeown8417yes the man wasn’t articulate enough but it’s intuition and life experience (being from Rotherham) were making him a more honest interlocutor.
Your disregard for logic is showing. What a piece of work indeed. Almost makes one think you can only function in bad faith.
@@Uliengue sorry if you think of me this way but maybe you should also be more convincing instead of getting frustrated with the person you are debating.
@raffam3559 and no matter how many times you say it. It's not my say so. Charter. Likud. Dates. Nothing in those words are within my control
All these people who are saying that Lee Anderson has said nothing inappropriate Replace Islamist With jewish Would they have all been Saying he had said nothing wrong
Sadiq khan as a human rights lawyer very strangely never seems to care about human rights unless your a muslim and an extremist at that..do you not know that mans history and who he has represented in the past? Why dont you bring any of this up sangita? Do you want me to give you a list of his previous clients? How do i get to talk to you sangita? Give me a number for an Irish person to ring your radio show..
Brilliant, thank heavens for journalists like yourself who calmly and with FACTS and EVIDENCE call these nasty idiots out. Thank you
Most her facts are fiction.
Im with the caller. Lee was right to call it as it is.
Because you don't like evidence?
@@DDuMas because he is right. The evidence of the behaviour he was calling out has been there for anyone that can see, to see.
@@lDolly975And what is this evidence and why hasn't everyone else "seen" it? 😕
“Oh Mark it’s absolutely not happening”
Famous last words
The Conservative MP's comment & criticism of the London Mayor was absolutely on point! .Sadiq Khan is in charge,while the Cops are failing to do their Jobs efficiently,( As we saw last week when those images were being beamed onto 'Big Ben')
And most people know why,so the criticism by Lee Anderson is in order & calling it Islamophobia is just a distraction or Smokescreen,as the LBC presenter knows full well!
how is this woman given airtime?
I think we can hazard a guess...
What a cow !
Get douglas murray to talk to this woman she would run a mile😂
Khan and Warsi are decent people and thereafter decent politicians. Only one of them belong to a decent political party. Come and join us Sayeeda🙏
This woman is SO ANNOYING
Is she for real? Obnoxious!
Gutted for Mark if he had to pay for that phone call.
The Big Ben thing was a breach of the law - this woman knows nothing
Patronising a guy who is not articulate but who's views are valid. Poor entertainment, and bullying.
I think Sangita is a terrible host. Her contempt for this caller and the opposing view is disgusting
Do something else then.
Not wrong mate...
Her opposing view is correct. The guy didn't even know what he was talking about. You can't expect someone to be nice to another person who is spreading the wrong facts and hatred. That's like expecting a person to interview a killer with no contempt. She did nothing disgusting but point out his fallacy about Sadiq. The man literally have no reasons for his opinions.
This woman is a very bad interviewer. She doesn't let him speak, she talks over him and argues her own point relentlessly. She is rude, sarcastic, and a bully. Get rid of her. Please. 😎🥰🌍
What an arrogant, patronising ‘reporter,’ it seems to be an LBC speciality. 🤣
Lee Anderson says what most of us think.
I agree as to what the caller is saying about Siddigue Khan - how in the world did he get to be the Mayor of this Christian nation founded on the values of our Judaeo-Christian values? We don’t need sharia law in this country as some parts are already doing. You must go to an Islamic country where you can happily practise this!
🙄🙄🙄🙄
What are thexexps of sharia law in london?
can you give me an example of sharia law being implemented in "some parts" of this country? Also, this country is not Christian. Its secular!
Churches are empty and the football stadium are full thats the religion of this land
@@ziazia7800 Music concerts are filled
I had friends/well more so acquaintances in the Police, and I used to listen in to some of their stories. One thing that did crop up once or twice was that if they had to go to question/arrest someone in a mostly Muslim area/street, they either went super nice "Please come out" in order not to upset the locals who often defended any of their own no matter what they were being arrested for or, they had to send extra Police to watch each others backs.
Now, I would think the same goes for any street community, but seeing as London is turning more Muslim by the day, the pure maths of it says that as the numbers grow, so does their influence/power.
She should let the caller speak.
The caller should educate himself before speaking
No! There should be no muslim in authority in the UK at all!
Awesome debate between an enlightened mind and one which has brainwashed himself in bubble of his own making
You can see both sides are as bad as each other ?
Just because one sounds smart doesn’t mean she doesn’t have her agenda
Lee Anderson was correct in what he said....She wont let guy speak.
Sangria seems to love the sound of her own voice.
Her mouth is fine but her eyes?
She can’t see the wood for the trees.
This woman is vile.....simply odious