@@AyyubAkhmad I study the historical facts of Islam. Not the lies told by the greedy Imams. If Muhammad was so important why did no one write about him when he was alive?
@@AyyubAkhmad you mean Allah Dajjal 👹 🕋 , according to Hadith mention very clear about the dajjal arrival, dajjal will declare himself as a GOD in Islam, so Islam GOD name is ALLAH,no doubt Allah is dajjal 👹🕋
@@AyyubAkhmad You have to scare and threaten people with violence to keep them in your religion which is very pathetic, 1slam is being exposed for the scam it is and millions of musl1ms are leaving your religion of death and lies and its beautiful
Mecca has a water source, the zam-zam well. But no Agriculture, unlike T'aif wich is 50km east, an Oasis and is actully at a trading route, a center for culture and trade.
@@slippingsnake the Zam-Zam well is not enough to support huge populations. Maybe water collection from rain could be one of the practice to support the population
@@prophetspath.319 *what a mistake in the Qur'an!* Allah himself testifies that he has a son and he is the son as Christians understand it! Only the Koran writer was too ignorant to know what Son of God means! Allah's word which created everything is Allah himself too! *The Word Allahs which created everything is the Son of God according to Christianity!*
This is very good informative historical research works. We are learning new things every time you make presentations and thank you for the good work. God bless you all.
@@AyyubAkhmad How? disprove it with objective verifiable historical archeaological or scientific proof Otherwise your comment is just biased assertion and can be dismissed as just noise.
@@martinjackman2943 Which objective verifiable historical archeological or scientific proof do you refer? Is there anything historical or archeological or even scientific that has ever been proven in all of the standard islamic narrations (SIN) that you have knowledge of? Historically there’s nothing absolutely to write about which exactly is what this presentation is all about. What may be termed historical where nothing but fictions written by non-historians who wrote two to three centuries after the facts of events that were not in their vicinity. They lived thousands of miles away from the purported scene coming up with disjointed unbelievable, untrustworthy and unreliable stories. Archeologically, not one thing ever been found anywhere that supports the SIN, rather the scenes are being sealed off with heavy slabs and concrete works over the purported areas where anything can be found. If you have any such evidence please supply and share such beautiful information with the world. Scientifically, your very scholars and dawagandist have debunked most of the scientific claims as fabricated and untrue designed purposefully to lure and confuse the public. Please mention any one trusted scientific claim that you believe is true. Is your literature a scientific literature or a theological literature? Stop wasting your time my friend please come home.
@@AyyubAkhmad Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. No one comes unto the Father except through Him! If you don’t accept that He paid for your sins on the cross, you will pay for them in Perdition because you rejected the free offer of Salvation.
@@AyyubAkhmad Allohu akbar means Alloh is bigger not the greatest. the word Allohu akbar appeared in surah /chapter 29 al kabut verse 45 & Al anam 6 verse 78..
@@AyyubAkhmad Its not even a proper religion just a bunch of silly stories from the Hijjaz exploited by violent warlords A borrowed God with a borrowed name and stolen stories ranted by an unknown madman That's it .FAKE
It wasn't because of Videos, the Lord changed my life and made me leave Islam, made me realize everything when I was just 17. It was a sudden question at 3:00 AM - Who said other religions are wrong? then miracles happened, God showed me everything I needed to see, taught me everything I should have Learned. And Here I am, wearing my cross.
I knew a graduate student who took a seminar on the origins of Islam, which he told us about. The seminar leader was an Orthodox Jewish doctoral student, so that may have influenced his views about how Islam was started up. I didn't attend any of the seminar sessions, and only know what I was told about it. The fellow who was, I guess, the seminar teacher, presented a theory, which he acknowledged to be an unproven theory, that the person identified as Mohammed, was probably either a minor tribal sheik or the leader of a group of outlaws, somewhere on the northern margin of the Arabian desert. This Mohammed had a group of warriors or robbers which he commanded, and after carrying out looting raids in towns on the northern margin of the desert, he started leading his gang or army southward into the desert, where there was no regular government and therefore no organized military forces. So, the people who might be resisting him, were something like ad hoc militias, who couldn't offer much resistance. However, he was making the raids in order to take whatever there was of value, in the desert, not to conquer territory. Since things of value there, didn't actually amount to much, what he did, was to take captives and steal livestock, which he took back north where he could sell them. In that era, a warrior's compensation was, partly, that he was allowed to loot in areas where the military force went. Since there wasn't much to loot in the desert, Mohammed hit on the idea of altering whatever religion his warriors or outlaws had, to a religion based on the idea that they could go to paradise if they fought to spread the religion, and if someone was killed while doing that, he would immediately go to paradise. As we know, a religious idea like that, worked very well for the Islamic religion in the seventh and eighth centuries. So, the theory was, that Mohammed, or whoever he was, wound up making a substantial income as a slave trader, and that could have been the basis of his financial success. I'm not sure whether, in the seminar, Mohammed was considered to have originated the theological details of Islam, or even whether he had much to do with the spread of Islam in areas outside the desert. I don't know for a fact that Mohammed was a major slave trader, but I guess that, in the seminar, it was at least suggested that he might have been one of the biggest slave traders of his day. Of course, an Orthodox Jew, and the seminar leader was not someone that I knew, would want to discredit the Islamic religion as much as possible. You might note that someone has said, that there have continuously been slaves in the Arabian peninsula, for at least the last three thousand years. I have no idea whether the seminar was based on any published research, but it is known that Mohammed both owned and sold slaves, according to accounts of his life. I think other theories were discussed in the seminar, this is the one I thought most interesting.
It was on this very program that it was proved without every shadow of doubt that Mecca was in Petra.Todays Mecca is the fake Mecca. No archeological evidence suggesting humans even inhabited the desert called Mecca today.
@@defenderoftruth3212 I am not sure what U talk about. I am not able to controll what happen in Heaven. That is the heaven of the true Jesus i mean. Are U talking about the religion of pease? BTW I am not Viking Tur......😀
@@defenderoftruth3212 I am not sure what U try to plant or start. I hope U are able to try to understand and that this video will lead u back to Jesus. I dont want to kritic u for Islam but it clear that so many people have been deceved and lied to and lead into a culture that destroy nation and people. Jesus is life. Jesus is waiting for u to listen to his word. Jesus is the light and by follow him U will have a vonderful life and all your famely and friends could have a vonderfull life to if they could only open your eyes.
An important distinction should be mentioned, namely, that the 'Arabs' were generally called 'Tayaye' in Syriac and 'Sarakenoi' in Koiné Greek. Contemporaneous Chinese records refer to the Tayaye rather than to Arabs. The 'tayaye d'mhmt' (Tayaye tribe of Mohammed) are living in southern Syria, not in the Hijaz.
'MUHAMMAD' was an HONORIFIC epithet similar to 'AUGUSTUS' (latin) or 'SEBASTOS' (greek) and may even be the Arabic version of that epithet. Mohammed is a literary invention and a composite character whose legends grew like other medieval legends such as those of King Arthur or Robin Hood or WIlliam Tell. Most of the legends were suppressed by al-Bukhari. The legends that remain are often mutually inconsistent. Why did al-Bukhari not get rid of those inconsistencies and contradictions.
Jesus saved me. Am Ex Muslim. But all those long how can you believe the person who did all sins en you fail to believe who's going the save the world. 😢
🎯@@defenderoftruth3212 This is a sign of weak people they instantly stoop to personal attacks. This only proves that I was right. Genetic engineering will save our children from all defects. Allah fails. 🤢
I have a Mizrahi Jewish Background. I know Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic with its different branches and of course classical Arabic with the Levant variant. I am quite sure that MHMD was an exilarch title for the "מינים minim, dissident" Jews as it happens Nazarenes in the Metropolitanate of Beth Garmai (central Iraq) under the sasanian empire.
Sure you can debunked but you can not debunk 2 Billion boy 2 Billion while your Christianity sinking your little boy i know you have night mare but first try clear your Issue with Jew then talk about islam
@@pishro09 that’s laughable. You don’t have any true numbers on actual Muslims until muslim countries remove the apostasy laws. You have no real data if people could lose their lives saying they aren’t Muslim.
We are fortunate that today we have sciences like anthropology, archelogy, etc. All the sciences born within the last 200 years, all the information gathering by scholars and piecing together of that info is a blessing. It is really remarkable we have content like this to watch. Thanks Al Fadi and Jay Smith for all the time and work put into these videos!
We must expose the Truth to Muslims in love and respect. Many millions are deceived, and Truth mingled with compassion must be implemented to persuade Muslims.
I hope that you guys can improve on production.. use video editing software instead of slide shows.. make the maps more visible.. we will get better clarity about exactly what you are referring to.
A sincere question from a Christian brother: how do you explain the existence of Shia and Sunni Muslims, when the Islamic Mohammed never existed and therefore Ali didn’t either?
In the philippines is historical area..also google pointing the philippines as OPHIR..The i watch this vlog..muhammad...suddenly someone vlog .and researh..world bank..i read king prophet muhhamad..😂who depisot..i didnt heard prophet muhammad in the philppines..but why is wrtten .the philippines religion before is anitism..hindu. pagan.and many more..now 2015 they dig idols of hindu in agusan del sur..if u search..history of the philippines it connecting..THE SPANISH WIPE OUT THE HISTORY OF PHILIPPINES.. IS OPHIR..MAHARLIKA..
1. Creation accounts: The order of events and details in the creation narratives of Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 differ, including the creation of humans and animals. 2. Genealogy of Jesus: The genealogies of Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke present different names and lineages, leading to inconsistencies. 3. Timing of Jesus' death: The timing of Jesus' death differs between the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and the Gospel of John, causing discrepancies in the events leading up to his crucifixion. 4. Resurrection accounts: The Gospel accounts of the resurrection of Jesus contain differences in the details of who discovered the empty tomb and the events that followed. 5. Judas' death: The descriptions of Judas Iscariot's death in Matthew 27:5 and Acts 1:18-19 differ in the circumstances and outcome. 6. The fate of the righteous: Proverbs 12:28 states that "in the way of righteousness is life," while Ecclesiastes 9:5 suggests that "the dead know nothing" and have no reward or knowledge. 7. God's nature: There are passages that depict God as both all-loving and all-merciful, while others portray God as wrathful and vengeful, leading to apparent contradictions in God's character. 8. Historical inconsistencies: The accounts of historical events, such as the reigns of kings or the conquest of cities, may differ between different books or present challenges when compared to external historical records. 9. Justification by faith or works: The teachings of Paul in Romans and Galatians emphasize justification by faith, while James 2:24 states that "a person is justified by works and not by faith alone," potentially leading to a theological contradiction. 10. The nature of God's revelation: The understanding of God's revelation and the requirements for salvation may differ between different biblical passages, leading to diverse theological interpretations and potential contradictions.
11. God's visibility: Exodus 33:20 states that no one can see God's face and live, while Genesis 32:30 and Exodus 33:11 mention instances where people saw God face to face. 12. The order of creation: Genesis 1:11-13 states that plants were created before humans, while Genesis 2:4-9 suggests that humans were created before plants. 13. Age of Ahaziah: 2 Kings 8:26 states that Ahaziah was 22 years old when he became king, while 2 Chronicles 22:2 mentions that he was 42 years old. 14. Death of Goliath: 2 Samuel 21:19 mentions Elhanan killing Goliath, while 1 Samuel 17:50 attributes Goliath's death to David. 15. Resurrection appearances: The Gospel accounts of the resurrection appearances of Jesus provide varying details and sequences of events. 16. Sabbath observance: Exodus 20:8-11 commands strict Sabbath observance, while Jesus' actions and teachings in the New Testament sometimes appear to challenge Sabbath rules. 17. Jesus' cleansing of the Temple: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) place the event during Jesus' final week in Jerusalem, while the Gospel of John situates it at the beginning of Jesus' ministry. 18. The fate of Judas' field: Matthew 27:3-8 and Acts 1:18-19 provide differing accounts of what happened to the field that Judas acquired with the money he received for betraying Jesus. 19. Animal sacrifices: The book of Hebrews emphasizes that Jesus' sacrifice supersedes the need for animal sacrifices, while the book of Leviticus describes extensive rituals of animal sacrifice. 20. Inheritance laws: Numbers 27:8-11 and Numbers 36:8-9 present conflicting instructions regarding the inheritance rights of women. 21. The length of the Israelite exile: Jeremiah 25:11-12 prophesies a 70-year period of Babylonian exile, while Ezra 1:1-3 and other accounts suggest a different duration. 22. The order of Jesus' temptations: The order of temptations presented in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke during Jesus' wilderness experience differs. 23. Ascension of Jesus: The Gospel of Luke describes Jesus' ascension taking place on the same day as his resurrection, while the Gospel of Acts suggests a 40-day gap. 24. Instructions on divorce: Jesus' teachings on divorce in Matthew 19:9 seem stricter than the exceptions given in Mark 10:11-12 and Luke 16:18. 25. The fate of the righteous and the wicked: Proverbs 24:16 states that the righteous fall seven times but rise again, while Psalm 37:24 asserts that the righteous will not fall. 26. The number of angels at Jesus' tomb: The number of angels present at Jesus' tomb after his resurrection differs between the Gospel accounts. 26. Salvation by faith or works: The teachings of Paul in Romans emphasize salvation by faith, while James 2:14-26 emphasizes the importance of works. 28. Circumcision: The New Testament presents different teachings on the necessity and significance of circumcision for believers. 29. The birth narratives of Jesus: The Gospels of Matthew and Luke offer distinct accounts of Jesus' birth, including different genealogies, locations, and events. 30. The nature of God's forgiveness: In some passages, forgiveness is depicted as freely given by God, while in others, conditions or requirements are presented.
31. The flood account: The dimensions of Noah's ark and the number of animals brought on board differ between Genesis 6:15-16 and Genesis 7:2-3. 32. The origin of evil: Isaiah 45:7 states that God creates both light and darkness, peace and evil, while James 1:13 asserts that God cannot be tempted by evil. 33. The commandment to honor parents: Exodus 20:12 and Ephesians 6:2 instruct people to honor their parents, while Luke 14:26 suggests that discipleship requires hating one's parents. 34. The genealogy of Joseph: Matthew 1:16 lists Jacob as the father of Joseph, while Luke 3:23 names Heli as Joseph's father. 35. The fate of the righteous and the wicked: Proverbs 10:27 claims that the righteous will live long, while Ecclesiastes 7:15 suggests that the righteous perish prematurely. 36. The birthplace of Jesus: Matthew 2:1-6 indicates that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, while Luke 2:4-7 suggests that he was born in Nazareth. 37. Dietary restrictions: Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 provide different lists of clean and unclean animals. 38. The second commandment: Exodus 20:4-6 prohibits the making of any graven images, while Exodus 25:18-20 instructs the creation of cherubim images for the Ark of the Covenant. 39. The fate of King Saul: 1 Samuel 31:4-6 and 2 Samuel 1:8-10 offer differing accounts of King Saul's death. 40. The nature of God's wrath: Exodus 20:5 speaks of God's wrath lasting to the third and fourth generation, while Ezekiel 18:20 asserts that children will not be punished for their parents' sins. 41. The mode of baptism: The New Testament mentions both immersion (Acts 8:38) and pouring (Acts 2:17) as forms of baptism. 42. The birthright of Esau: Genesis 25:33-34 suggests that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of stew, while Hebrews 12:16 indicates that Esau sold it for a single meal. 43. The state of mind in death: Ecclesiastes 9:5 claims that the dead know nothing, while Luke 16:19-31 presents the story of the rich man and Lazarus with conscious existence after death. 44. The preaching of Jesus' message: Matthew 5:17 suggests that Jesus came to fulfill the law, while Matthew 5:21-22 presents him as teaching a higher standard than the law. 45. The timing of the crucifixion: Mark 15:25 indicates that Jesus was crucified at the third hour, while John 19:14-15 mentions the sixth hour. 46. The fate of Judas Iscariot: Matthew 27:5 suggests that Judas hanged himself, while Acts 1:18-19 indicates that he fell headlong and burst open. 47. The requirements for salvation: Acts 16:30-31 emphasizes faith as the requirement for salvation, while Acts 2:38 emphasizes repentance and baptism. 48. The identity of Jesus' paternal grandfather: Matthew 1:12 states that Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel, while Luke 3:27 lists Neri as his father. 49. The law of retaliation: Exodus 21:23-25 prescribes "an eye for an eye" but instead respond to evil with goodness and love (Matthew 5:38-42). 50. Genealogy of Cainan: In Genesis 11:12, Shelah is listed as the son of Arphaxad, while in Luke 3:36, Shelah is the son of Cainan, not mentioned in the Genesis account.
The Injeel, in Islamic tradition, refers to the original gospel or message given to Prophet Isa (Jesus) by God. Muslims believe that this original message was pure and free of distortion. However, it is believed that the current Gospels found in the New Testament are not the same as the original Injeel, as they have undergone changes over time. One reason why the Injeel is considered no longer the same as the current Gospels is the process of textual transmission and translation. The original Injeel was believed to have been delivered orally in Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus and his disciples. As the message was passed down, it was translated into Greek, the common language of the Eastern Mediterranean at the time. This translation process, along with the passage of time and the lack of an official written record from Jesus himself, led to variations and alterations in the text. Different Christian communities had different versions of the Gospels, and over time, these texts were compiled, edited, and sometimes harmonized, resulting in discrepancies and inconsistencies. Another factor is the doctrinal changes and developments within early Christian communities. As Christianity spread, theological debates and councils led to the establishment of certain doctrines and the rejection of others. These theological decisions influenced how the Gospels were interpreted and understood. For example, the concept of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus were not explicitly laid out in the earliest Christian texts but became central tenets of Christian doctrine over time. This evolution of belief further distanced the content of the current Gospels from what Muslims believe was the original Injeel. Additionally, the Gospels in the New Testament are attributed to different authors (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), none of whom were direct recipients of the original message. These authors wrote their accounts several decades after the life of Jesus, relying on oral traditions and earlier sources. This gap between the life of Jesus and the writing of the Gospels introduces further uncertainty about the accuracy of the recorded message. In summary, from an Islamic perspective, the Injeel was a divine revelation given to Jesus in Aramaic, and it was originally an oral message. The current Gospels, written in Greek and influenced by early Christian theological developments, are considered to have diverged from this original revelation due to translation, textual transmission, and doctrinal changes over time. Therefore, the Injeel as a pure and unaltered message is believed to no longer exist in the form found in the New Testament.
The name "Muhammad," meaning "the Praised One," was not unique to the Prophet of Islam and could refer to God or other figures. The interpretation of inscriptions bearing this name depends significantly on their context. It is crucial to distinguish between the common use of the term and its specific application to the Islamic prophet.
The Bible underwent significant changes beginning with Constantine's involvement in the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Athanasius later compiled the Bible in 367 AD, selecting which scriptures to include or exclude. In the 16th century, the introduction of the letter "J" led to a major revamp of the Bible. Names were altered: Yakob became Jacob, Yohana became John, Yusuf became Joseph, Yehuda became Judah, Yoel became Joel, Yonah became Jonah, Yehoyakim became Joachim, Yehoshua became Joshua, Yirmeyahu became Jeremiah, and Yeshua (originally Isa/Isho) became Jesus. The changes did not stop there. The Bible has continued to undergo numerous revisions over the centuries, including modern times.
Bible is the scripture that has been compiled for centuries, orally transmitted person to person without taking care of preservation of original text, narrators narrated in there own words, So whatever mentioned in Bible is debatable. whereas Original text of Quran is Preserved and won't ever be altered, its God's promise. Further Languages in which Bible was revealed or initially recorded are either died or vanished centuries ago. whereas Quranic Arabic is a Marvel of linguistic till today. won't ever Die or obsolete.
This video, and others like it, show that Mohammad was a title given to several people in the times preceding and during the Arab Revolution. Of particular note is the Jewish exilarchs. Basically you have a messianic movement based upon the Jewish idea of the a warrior Messiah. The praised one. As you watch more of these videos, you will see there are a few Mohammads, of differing ethnicity and religion during this period. The Quranic Mohammad is a composite of these people, placed in the Hijaz to give an Arab identity to the warrior Messiah. This is because the main people doing the fighting, dying, and protecting were Arab auxiliaries during the Roman-Sassanian war and in the Arab Revolution that immediately followed. I would think it was the Umayyads who started this, as they created a new religion to compete with the Byzantine Orthodox faith. Islam is basically Anti-Trinitarianism Christianity, which was the dominant faith in the Roman Levant and Egypt. Creating an Arab quasi-messianic figure is the only real difference between the two.
These two also have videos proving there have been, and still are, multiple versions of the Quran. And that the poetry parts of it are lifted from Aramaic Christian hymns, as Christ had the title, "the praised one" in that language. I.e. Mohammad. The Umayyads and Abbasid caliphates changed the person being referred to as MHMD from Jesus to an Arab religious freedom fighter in order to legitimize Arab rule (a minority) over the Aramaic and Persian subjects (majority.) Quran is NOT the unchanged scriptures you profess them to be. A compilation of Christian poetry from the Nabaeteans mixed with Anti-trinitarian theology with an Arab figurehead. A perverted Christian theology. Watch the videos from these guys and get educated. Or live in the Islamic world of pretend.
I assume you mean the books of the New Testament since we know the books of the Old Testament are preserved as they were in Jesus’ day because of the Dead Sea scrolls. No you’re wrong about the text being compiled “for centuries” when the text of the gospels and acts were written by the apostles themselves and the thousands of manuscripts of these gospel are virtually identical. The epistles are also written by Paul and Peter. Unlike the Quran which Uthman gathered and had 5 men pick what was true and what was false and burned all the rest. Meaning we don’t know how much of your Quran is lost.
So it seems that this prophet Mohammed fits into the description in chapter 13 of the St. John’s Revelation, so we have the liar prophet of the Beast identified!
@@FalconManBoy It's "finally" you're probably confused because Jay Smith inverted the word order.. Usually it's "finally, they brought water. or they brought water finally. It's done in this order for emphasis sometimes but Jay is rushing his speech. (He could slow down a bit but I enjoy his enthusiasm!)
@@FalconManBoy Ther was a small well the zamzam ... (probably not the original which is in Petra ) enough for a few sheep and camels and maybe a little village..definitely not an ancient city .. Mecca is fake.
Amen John 14:6 And Jesus said into him; I am the Way the Truth and the Life No man comes unto the Father but by me ~ There is NO " Interfaith " ... There is One Faith ... Ephesians 4-5 One Lord One Faith One Baptism ~ Romans 10:17 So then Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God ~ There is One Faith... It is Not Islam Buddhism or Hinduism ...... John 8:58 Truly I tell You; Before Abraham was; I am ~ John 10:9 For the thief comes not but to steal kill and destroy 10 But I am come that ye might have life and have it more abundantly ~ Galatians 3:28 There is neither jew nor greek; there is neither bond or free; There is neither male nor female in Christ For ye are all One in Christ 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed and heirs according to the Promise ~ NOTE: Decades..The Papacy has been joined w/the fraternal Brotherhood Abu Dhabi headquarters ..leading false peace and unity world wide promoting an Interfaith ... Catholicism is not the True Church .... Rome has designed Vatican Center as a serpent in and out.. The altar head w/eyes and fangs in 24/7 Satan worship welcoming the AntiChrist .... 1John 2:22 who is a liar but he that denies Jesus is Christ? he is AntiChrist that denies the Father and the Son 23 he that denies the Son the same hath not the Father; he that acknowledges the Son hath the Father also ~ Matthew 6:24 No one can serve two masters; either you will hate the one and love the other; or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other; you cannot serve both God and money ~
1. Christian Disagreements: Highlight the significant theological disagreements in early Christianity regarding the nature of Jesus and the Trinity. Early Christian history saw numerous debates and councils, such as Nicaea (325 CE) and Constantinople (381 CE), which were convened to resolve these disputes. Even after these councils, various sects like Arianism, Nestorianism, and others continued to present differing views. ------------------------------------- 2. Islamic Consensus: Contrast this with the relative theological unity in Islam. From its inception, core beliefs such as the oneness of God (Tawhid), the finality of the prophethood with Muhammad (s.a.w.), and the belief in the Day of Resurrection have remained consistent across all major Islamic sects. Despite differences in jurisprudence and certain theological interpretations, these core beliefs have been universally accepted. ------------------------------------- **Key Islamic Beliefs** 1. Tawhid (Oneness of God): Emphasize the Islamic doctrine of Tawhid, which asserts the absolute oneness and uniqueness of God. This concept has been a foundational and unifying belief in Islam from the very beginning. ------------------------------------- 2. Finality of Prophethood: The belief in Muhammad (s.a.w.) as the last prophet is another core tenet that all Muslims agree upon. This finality of prophethood is clearly stated in the Quran (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:40) and has been a point of consensus among Muslims. ------------------------------------- 3. Day of Resurrection: The belief in the Day of Judgment is also a fundamental part of Islamic theology, universally accepted by all Muslim sects. It is a key aspect of the faith that underscores accountability and the afterlife. ------------------------------------- **Practical Implications** 1. Impact on Unity: Point out that this theological consistency has contributed to a strong sense of unity within the Muslim community (Ummah) regarding core beliefs, despite cultural and sectarian diversity. ------------------------------------- 2. Contrast in Doctrine Evolution: Highlight that while Christianity developed and formalized doctrines like the Trinity over centuries through councils and debates, Islamic theology regarding the nature of God and prophethood has remained consistent from the time of the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.). ------------------------------------- **Supporting Texts** 1. Quranic Verses: Cite Quranic verses that affirm these core beliefs: - Tawhid: "Say, He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge" (Surah Al-Ikhlas 112:1-2). ------------------------------------- - Finality of Prophethood: "Muhammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allah and the last of the prophets" (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:40). ------------------------------------- - Day of Resurrection: "The Hour will certainly come; there is no doubt about it, yet most people do not believe" (Surah Ghafir 40:59). -------------------------------------
Quran 43.81 If Allah had a Son Mohamad would be the first to worship him Mark 15:39 “Truly this man was the Son of God!” Quran 2.41 Pickthall confirming that which ye *possess* already (of the Scripture)
I don't think he's fake, but he has still brought a lot of harm to the world, and for some reason, his cult wants to bring everyone back to the Stone Age.
The Bible contains contradictions and inconsistencies, such as differing accounts of the same events in the Gospels (e.g., Matthew 28:1-8 vs. Mark 16:1-8). Many biblical stories and laws reflect the cultural and historical context of ancient societies, suggesting human authorship rather than divine dictation (e.g., Leviticus 25:44-46 on slavery). Some parts of the Bible appear to endorse morally problematic behaviors, like slavery and genocide, which raises questions about divine morality (e.g., 1 Samuel 15:3). 1 Samuel 15:3 (ESV): "Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey." Is this God's words. It is promoting genocide! There are numerous textual variants and alterations across different manuscripts, indicating a history of human editing and transmission errors (e.g., differences between the Septuagint and Masoretic Text). The Bible includes mythological elements and stories similar to those found in other ancient Near Eastern cultures, implying shared human origins (e.g., the flood narrative in Genesis 6-9). Scientific and historical inaccuracies in the Bible conflict with modern understanding, casting doubt on its divine inspiration (e.g., the creation account in Genesis 1). The process of canonization was influenced by human decisions and political considerations, rather than a clear divine directive (e.g., the exclusion of certain apocryphal books). Many ethical teachings in the Bible are interpreted differently by various denominations, leading to conflicting moral guidelines that seem unlikely if it were a unified divine message (e.g., differing views on divorce and remarriage in Matthew 19:9 vs. 1 Corinthians 7:10-11).
why there is no consensus among Christians on core beliefs and are still debatable..? 1. Isn't that the divinity of Jesus is still debatable among Christians? 2. Isn't that there are varying interpretations and beliefs about Jesus' nature among different denominations and individuals? 3. Isn't that some Christians interpret the Bible literally while others see it as allegorical or symbolic? 4. Isn't that there are different Christian perspectives on salvation and how it is achieved? 5. Isn't that Christians understand the concept of the Trinity, and why do some denominations reject it? 6. Isn't that there are differing views among Christians regarding predestination and free will? 7. Isn't that various Christian denominations understand the nature and role of the Holy Spirit differently? 8. Isn't that some Christians believe in the necessity of baptism for salvation while others see it as symbolic? 9. Isn't that there are different Christian beliefs about the end times and the second coming of Jesus? 10. Isn't that Christians reconcile the existence of suffering and evil with a benevolent and omnipotent God differently? 11. Isn't that there are differing practices among Christian denominations regarding the ordination of women as clergy? 12. Isn't that Christians view the relationship between faith and works in the context of salvation differently? 13. Isn't that interpretations of the Eucharist (Holy Communion) vary among Christian denominations? 14. Isn't that there are differing Christian perspectives on the authority of the Pope and the structure of church leadership? 15. Isn't that Christians view the role of tradition versus scripture in guiding their beliefs and practices differently? 16. Isn't that there are varying beliefs about the nature of Jesus' resurrection among Christians? 17. Isn't that different Christian groups approach the concept of original sin and its impact on humanity differently? 18. Isn't that there is debate over the proper mode of baptism (immersion, sprinkling, pouring) among Christians? 19. Isn't that there are differing views among Christians on how to observe the Sabbath and whether it needs to be on Sunday? 20. Isn't that the role of Mary, the mother of Jesus, in the Christian faith is interpreted differently? 21. Isn't that Christians engage with and interpret modern scientific findings, such as evolution and the age of the earth, differently? 22. Isn't that there are different understandings among Christians about justification and sanctification in the life of a believer? 23. Isn't that Christians understand and respond to homosexuality and same-sex marriage differently? 24. Isn't that there are varying opinions among Christians on the appropriate role of social justice and activism within the faith? 25. Isn't that Christians approach interfaith dialogue and the salvation of those outside the Christian faith differently? 26. Isn't that there are varying views among Christians on the proper role of spiritual gifts (like speaking in tongues, prophecy, and healing) in the modern church? 27. Isn't that Christians approach wealth, poverty, and economic inequality differently? 28. Isn't that there are differing Christian stances on issues like abortion and euthanasia? 29. Isn't that Christians debate on how the church should engage with politics and government? 30. Isn't that the role of confession and repentance in the life of a Christian is understood differently? 31. Isn't that there are different interpretations among Christians on how to apply the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount? 32. Isn't that Christians have varying beliefs about the nature of the afterlife, including concepts of heaven, hell, and purgatory? 33. Isn't that Christians understand the relationship between the Old Testament and the New Testament differently? 34. Isn't that the importance and role of the sacraments in the Christian life are interpreted differently? 35. Isn't that Christians address historical and contemporary issues of racial reconciliation differently? 36. Isn't that Christians discern and follow God's will or calling in their life differently? 37. Isn't that Christians have different perspectives on the appropriate response to persecution and suffering for one's faith?
@@The_Last_Rick , notice the Muslim shuffle dance? This clown CANNOT deal with the topic of the video, so he jumps to attacking Christianity instead. Pathetic.
Everytime muslims cannot provide a rebuttal then what they do is change the topic. This is proof that islam is false and fragile, because there's no truth in it.
Allah Praying: The claim that Allah prays to Prophet Muhammad is incorrect. In Islamic theology, Allah is the supreme deity who is not subject to human-like actions such as praying. When it is said that Allah sends blessings (salawat) upon the Prophet, it means that He bestows mercy and honor upon him. This is vastly different from the act of praying as understood in a human context
Un jour j’ai posté un message: disant que le quran tombé du ciel en l’an 600! N’était qu’une invention humaine comme beaucoup d’autre religion. Et un muslim m’a répondu: comment tu expliques Adam et Ève! Je lui ai dit en retour une question: pourquoi le mode d emploi n’ai pas tombé dans leurs bras à Adam et Ève? Il fallu attendre l’an 600 😂 🎉 pitoyable religion… le soleil se couche sur la terre vive Momo😂 soleil 110x la terre! D’un point de vue terrestre on voit effectivement le soleil se coucher à l’horizon😉 c’était bien essayé Allah👈ne connais plus son système solaire, le savant fou 🤓
I challenge that no one can translate this Hebrew verse in any language along with its original essence remain intact.. וְהוּא מְחֹלָל מִפְּשָׁעֵנוּ מְדֻכָּא מֵעֲוֹנֹתֵינוּ מוּסַר שְׁלוֹמֵנוּ עָלָיו וּבַחֲבֻרָתוֹ נִרְפָּא לָנוּ" Translation : "But he was pierced for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds, we are healed. and then you claim that after translation of the translation of the translation of the translation........ what left.🙂
Preservation and Language Comparison: Bible vs. Quran (Bible) 1. Compilation Over Centuries: The Bible was compiled over many centuries, involving numerous authors and oral traditions. 2. Oral Transmission: Initially, biblical texts were transmitted orally, which led to variations and potential alterations. 3. Debatable Texts: Due to the nature of its transmission and compilation, some biblical texts are subject to scholarly debate regarding their authenticity. 4. Language Extinction: Many original languages in which the Bible was revealed, such as Ancient Hebrew and Koine Greek, are no longer spoken languages. This complicates direct understanding and interpretation. (Quran) 1. Preserved Original Text: The Quran has been preserved in its original form since its revelation in the 7th century. 2. Divine Promise: According to Islamic belief, Allah has promised the protection and preservation of the Quran, ensuring it remains unaltered. 3. Consistent Transmission: The Quran was written down and memorized by companions of the Prophet Muhammad, ensuring consistency in its transmission. 4. Living Language: Quranic Arabic remains a vibrant and studied language, with its linguistic structure considered a marvel. It is still used in religious, academic, and daily contexts by millions of people. 5. Universal Accessibility: Despite the passage of time, the language of the Quran is still accessible to readers and scholars worldwide, allowing for direct engagement with the text. (Additional Points) 1. Textual Variants: The Bible exists in numerous versions and translations, each with slight differences, whereas the Quran has only one version across the Muslim world. 2. Manuscript Evidence: Thousands of biblical manuscripts exist, showing variations, whereas the Quran has uniform manuscripts dating back to the early Islamic period. 3. Linguistic Evolution: While biblical languages have evolved and in some cases become extinct, Quranic Arabic has maintained its classical form, studied and preserved by scholars. 4. Religious Practices: The recitation of the Quran in its original language is an integral part of Islamic worship, contributing to its preservation.
YAWN. According to EXPERTS, the Bible is the BEST-PRESERVED book in history. NO LEGITIMATE scholar says the same for the Qur'an. We have MOUNTAINS of evidence that the Qur'an has been EDITED many times, beginning with the Sanaa materials. Moreover, today there are 37 DIFFERENT Arabic versions of the Qur'an in circulation, with 93,000 variations between them. Those variations frequently CONTRADICT each other.
All the books from the bible come from prophets, witnesses, or 1st generation witness. The quran comes from one person who took stories, from the midrash, talmud, gnostic writings which are not canonized by Jewish or Christians authorities.
@@Verge63 how silly you are bro, Bible was the word of God revealed upon Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), your own claim that Bible is been written by many challenges the health of purity of Bible. whereas Quran was compiled in Prophet Muhammad's time and he was authority to do so. bcz he was the one who received Quran from Holy Spirit " Gabriel ".
@@Verge63 , Muhammad never actually existed. Chances are that the Qur'an was compiled by several anonymous authors, over a period of many decades. That is why the book is so wonky and self-contradicting.
@@dmisidia9359 , GOD DOES NOT WRITE BOOKS; humans do. Humans wrote the Bibel, INSPIRED by God. HUMANS wrote the Qur'an, inspired by SATAN. That is why the is a CESSPOOL of errors, evils, contradictions, absurdities, plagiarized materials, and general incoherence. Whoever wrote that asinine little book was simply less intelligent than toothpaste. If you claim that God wrote it, you are calling God an idiot. That's blasphemy.
Jesus spoke Aramaic, and the earliest church was in Palestine, specifically in Jerusalem, Israel. Therefore, they likely spoke Hebrew. However, by the time the New Testament was written, it was in Greek, resulting in a translation of Jesus' words before they were ever recorded. Furthermore, the New Testament that endured the longest in the church was not in Greek but in Latin. This means another translation. It remained in Latin for a thousand years before being translated into German, and from German, it was translated into English, giving us the KJV. Essentially, it's a translation of a translation of a translation of a translation of a translation. You can never translate any content into another language without losing the actual message, tone of speech, or essence. If you read the history of the transformation of languages of the Bible, you will find that almost nothing is left from the original word of God.
Errors found in the Bible. 51. Duration of the Egyptian Captivity: Exodus 12:40 states that the Israelites were in Egypt for 430 years, whereas Galatians 3:17 suggests a period of 430 years from Abraham to the Law, implying a shorter stay in Egypt. 52. The number of Israelites leaving Egypt: Exodus 12:37 states that about 600,000 men left Egypt, which would suggest a much larger total population including women and children. This number is sometimes questioned based on logistical and historical grounds. 53. Destruction of Jericho: Archaeological evidence has been debated regarding the timing and existence of Jericho's walls as described in Joshua 6. 54. The age of Terah when Abraham was born: Genesis 11:26 mentions that Terah was 70 years old when he became the father of Abram (Abraham), but Genesis 11:32 and Genesis 12:4 suggest a discrepancy in Terah's age and the timing of Abraham's departure from Haran. 55. Jesus' lineage through Joseph: The Gospels of Matthew and Luke provide different genealogies for Jesus, complicating the understanding of His descent from David through Joseph, especially since Joseph is not considered His biological father in Christian doctrine. 56. David’s census: 2 Samuel 24:1 says God incited David to take a census of Israel, while 1 Chronicles 21:1 attributes this incitement to Satan. 57. The number of the beast: While most manuscripts of Revelation 13:18 record the number of the beast as 666, some ancient sources record it as 616, leading to debates about the correct number. 58. Saul’s interaction with the Witch of Endor: 1 Samuel 28:6 states that Saul could not receive answers from God, yet he seeks a medium in 1 Samuel 28:7-20, which is seen as a contradiction of divine communication rules. 59. The inscription on the cross: The Gospels differ on the exact wording of the inscription placed above Jesus on the cross. Matthew 27:37, Mark 15:26, Luke 23:38, and John 19:19-20 each provide slightly different versions. 60. The destruction of Tyre: Ezekiel 26 prophesies the complete destruction of Tyre, never to be rebuilt. However, Tyre has been rebuilt and exists to this day. 61. The death of Jesus' apostles: The New Testament does not consistently describe the deaths of all the apostles, leading to variations in tradition and historical records about their fates. 62. The length of Jesus' ministry: The Synoptic Gospels suggest a one-year ministry, while the Gospel of John indicates a ministry lasting at least three years, based on the number of Passovers mentioned. 63. The number of women at the tomb: The Gospels differ in the number and identity of the women who visited Jesus' tomb after His resurrection, creating discrepancies in the resurrection narrative. 64. Paul’s vision: In Acts 9:7, Paul’s companions heard the voice during his conversion experience, while Acts 22:9 states they did not hear the voice. 65. Ownership of the land of Canaan: The Bible mentions several times that God gave the land of Canaan to the Israelites as an eternal inheritance, yet later historical and biblical texts describe the land being taken by other nations or occupied by foreign powers. 66. Judas’ remorse and repayment: In Matthew 27:3-10, Judas returns the 30 pieces of silver to the chief priests before hanging himself. Acts 1:18-19, however, does not mention this return of money but describes Judas buying a field with the payment and dying there. 67. Duration of reigns of kings: There are discrepancies between Kings and Chronicles regarding the ages and reigns of several kings of Judah and Israel, such as the lengths of reigns and the ages at which they began to reign. 68. Paul and the Law: In Acts 21:24-26, Paul participates in Jewish purification rituals, which some see as inconsistent with his teachings in his epistles about freedom from the Law for Gentile converts. 69. Discrepancies in genealogical lists: Various genealogical records, such as those in Genesis, Chronicles, Ezra, and the Gospels, sometimes show different names and lineages, leading to questions about their accuracy and consistency. 70. Timing of the birth of Jesus: The Gospels of Matthew and Luke differ in their accounts of the timeline surrounding Jesus' birth. Matthew mentions the reign of King Herod, while Luke places it during the census of Quirinius, creating a potential chronological discrepancy. 71. Number of years between the Exodus and the building of Solomon's Temple: 1 Kings 6:1 states that 480 years passed between the Exodus and the construction of the Temple, but other biblical chronologies suggest a different timeline. 72. The death of Ahaziah: In 2 Kings 9:27-28, Ahaziah is reported to have died at Megiddo, while 2 Chronicles 22:9 says he was found in Samaria and brought to Jerusalem, where he died. 73. Location of Jesus' early ministry: The Gospels sometimes differ on the specific locations of Jesus' activities, such as whether he was in Capernaum, Nazareth, or another location. 74. The number of animals in Noah's Ark: Genesis 6:19-20 and Genesis 7:2-3 differ on whether Noah was instructed to bring two of each kind of animal or seven pairs of clean animals and one pair of unclean animals. 75. The genealogy of Moses: Exodus 6:20 lists Amram as Moses' father, but 1 Chronicles 6:1-3 gives a slightly different lineage. 76. The number of Israelites slain by the Levites: Exodus 32:28 states that the Levites killed about 3,000 men after the golden calf incident, while 1 Corinthians 10:8 mentions 23,000 fell in one day. 77. The number of years in the wilderness: Deuteronomy 2:14 mentions 38 years of wandering after the Kadesh-Barnea incident, while Numbers 14:33-34 and Acts 13:18 suggest 40 years. 78. The location of Mount Sinai: The traditional identification of Mount Sinai's location varies, and there is debate over the exact historical and geographical site. 79. The date of Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem: The dates of the siege in 2 Kings and Jeremiah differ, causing confusion over the timeline of events. 80. Paul's journey to Jerusalem: Acts 15:2-4 describes Paul's journey to Jerusalem for the Council, while Galatians 2:1-2 provides a different account and reason for the trip. 81. The law regarding sacrifices and offerings: There are variations in the regulations about sacrifices and offerings between the books of Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. 82. David's mighty men: The list of David's mighty men in 2 Samuel 23:8-39 and 1 Chronicles 11:10-47 shows differences in names and numbers. 83. The plagues of Egypt: The sequence and descriptions of the plagues in Exodus sometimes differ in detail and emphasis, leading to variations in interpretation. 84. The fall of Samaria: The timelines and accounts of the fall of Samaria in 2 Kings 17 and 18 and other historical sources show discrepancies in dates and events. 85. The role of angels: Different passages depict varying roles and actions of angels, leading to questions about their nature and function. 86. The presence of evil spirits: Some passages attribute actions to evil spirits or Satan, while others suggest direct divine involvement, creating interpretative challenges. 87. The structure of the Tabernacle: The descriptions of the Tabernacle's design and construction in Exodus vary in detail and measurements. 88. *lThe genealogies in Genesis: The genealogical lists in Genesis 4, 5, and 10 sometimes show different lineages and names. 89. The laws of purity and impurity: The laws regarding ritual purity and impurity in Leviticus and Deuteronomy sometimes present different regulations. 90. The nature of prophetic messages: Prophecies in the Old Testament sometimes appear conditional, while others are presented as absolute, creating interpretative challenges. 91. The use of the term 'son of God': The term 'son of God' is used in various ways in the Old and New Testaments, leading to different theological understandings. 92. The nature of the Messiah: Different Old Testament passages present varying pictures of the Messiah, leading to diverse interpretations in Jewish and Christian traditions. 93. The role of women in the early Church: The New Testament presents differing views on the roles of women in the Church, as seen in Paul's letters. 94. The laws of war and conquest: The Old Testament presents different instructions and regulations for warfare and conquest, particularly in Deuteronomy and Joshua. 95. The structure and content of the Psalms: The numbering and content of the Psalms vary between the Hebrew, Greek (Septuagint), and Latin (Vulgate) versions. 96. The nature of the Holy Spirit: The descriptions and roles of the Holy Spirit vary between the Old and New Testaments, leading to different theological understandings. 97. The timing of the Last Supper: The Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John present different timelines for the Last Supper and the events leading up to Jesus' crucifixion. 98. The genealogy of the patriarchs: The genealogies of the patriarchs in Genesis 5 and 11 differ in the ages and lifespans of the individuals. 99. The nature of God's covenant with Israel: The nature and terms of God's covenant with Israel are presented differently in various parts of the Old Testament. 100. The role of the Law in the New Testament: The role and interpretation of the Mosaic Law in the New Testament vary between different authors and books, leading to theological debates. These are examples of perceived discrepancies or contradictions in the Bible that have been the subject of discussion and debate among scholars, theologians, and critics. Interpretations and understandings of these texts can vary widely depending on one's religious or academic perspective.
Muslims claim Muhammad's prophecy in the Bible vide Deuteronomy 18: 18 does not refer to Muhammad. Be fair don't cherry pick random verses of the Bible. There is no prophecy of Muhammad in the Bible.😂
@@hdl135605 The interpretation of Deuteronomy 18:18 as a prophecy of Muhammad is a perspective held by many Muslims based on the belief that this verse refers to a prophet who would come from the brethren of the Israelites, interpreted by them as referring to the descendants of Ishmael, and thus Muhammad. The verse says, "I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him." Christians traditionally interpret this verse as referring to Jesus, not Muhammad. They argue that the description of a prophet like Moses fits Jesus in terms of his mission, teachings, and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. The term "brothers" is often understood within the Christian tradition as referring to the Israelites, not the Ishmaelites. The claim that there is no prophecy of Muhammad in the Bible depends on one’s religious perspective and interpretive approach. Muslims see continuity between the Quran and earlier scriptures, while Christians typically do not view the Quran as a continuation of the biblical narrative. Whether Deuteronomy 18:18 refers to Muhammad or Jesus is a matter of interpretation rooted in theological differences between Islam and Christianity. Neither side is likely to convince the other through debate, as these interpretations are deeply tied to faith and religious identity.
@@hdl135605 Genesis 21:13 states, "And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed." This verse is part of the story of Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar, which centers around the birth of Isaac and Ishmael. In the broader narrative, God had promised Abraham that he would be the father of many nations, a promise that was first fulfilled through the birth of his son Isaac with Sarah. However, before Isaac was born, Abraham had a son named Ishmael with Hagar, Sarah's Egyptian maidservant. After Isaac's birth, Sarah asked Abraham to send Hagar and Ishmael away because she did not want Ishmael to share in Isaac's inheritance. Despite Sarah's demand, Abraham was troubled by the idea of sending his son Ishmael away. In response, God reassured Abraham in Genesis 21:12-13, telling him not to be distressed because Isaac would be the one through whom Abraham's line would be established, but also that Ishmael would not be forgotten. God promised to make Ishmael into a nation as well, because he too was Abraham's son. The significance of this verse lies in the fact that it acknowledges Ishmael's status as Abraham's son and underscores God's promise to bless him and make a nation of his descendants, despite the fact that the covenant with Abraham would be fulfilled through Isaac. This verse is often interpreted as the biblical foundation for the belief that Ishmael is the forefather of the Arab nations, with his descendants eventually becoming prominent in the Islamic tradition. In Genesis 16:3, it is stated, "So after Abram had lived ten years in the land of Canaan, Sarai, Abram's wife, took Hagar the Egyptian, her servant, and gave her to Abram her husband as a wife." This passage explicitly refers to Hagar being given to Abraham as a wife, indicating her status. Although Hagar was initially a servant, she was elevated to the status of a wife in this context. Additionally, in Genesis 16:4, it mentions that Abraham "went in to Hagar, and she conceived." The act of taking Hagar as a wife is reinforced here by the fact that she bore a child for Abraham, which was a significant aspect of a marital relationship in that cultural context. Thus, these verses support the claim that Hagar was indeed considered a wife of Abraham, even though her initial status was that of a servant. This narrative highlights God's faithfulness and His commitment to His promises, ensuring that both of Abraham's sons, Isaac and Ishmael, would have a significant legacy, though the covenant would continue through Isaac.
@@hdl135605 In Christianity, certain rules and regulations outlined in the Bible, particularly in the Old Testament, are not universally observed by all Christians today. For example, the instruction for women to cover their heads while praying, as mentioned in 1 Corinthians 11, is not commonly practiced in many modern Christian denominations. This was once a widespread practice, reflecting cultural norms of modesty, but over time, interpretations have evolved, and many Christians now view it as a cultural directive rather than a timeless mandate. Similarly, dietary laws from the Old Testament, such as the prohibition against eating pork, are not followed by most Christians. In the New Testament, particularly in the writings of Paul and the vision of Peter in Acts 10, there is a shift away from these dietary restrictions. Christians believe that through Christ, they are not bound by the ritual and dietary laws of the Old Testament, as these were specific to the covenant between God and Israel, while the new covenant through Jesus emphasizes faith and spiritual purity over ritual observance. Jesus himself observed many of the practices outlined in the Old Testament. He prayed with his face touching the ground, as described in Matthew 26:39, which reflects a posture of deep humility and submission to God. Jesus also practiced kosher dietary laws and was circumcised according to Jewish tradition, as recorded in Luke 2:21. These actions show that Jesus adhered to the Jewish laws and customs of his time. The issue of idolatry is more complex. The Ten Commandments clearly forbid the worship of idols or images, which remains a core principle in Christianity. However, the interpretation of what constitutes idolatry can vary. For instance, some Christian denominations use images or statues as aids to worship, which they believe are not idols but rather representations that help focus devotion. Other Christians, particularly those in Protestant traditions, may avoid such practices altogether, viewing any physical representation in worship as potentially idolatrous. These examples illustrate how Christian practices have adapted over time, influenced by cultural, theological, and historical developments. While some commands are seen as eternal moral laws, others are understood in the context of their time and are interpreted differently in light of the New Testament teachings and the broader Christian understanding of faith.
Islam is a false Prophet's religion , because of "" Maaa Kaaanaaa "" Meaning [ ( See-3 :67 ) (See-3 : 93 ) ( See-44 :31 ) ( See-2 : 34 ) ( See-33 :69 ) ( See- 33 : 40 ) ( See- 19 : 13 ) ] , ??? If "" Maaa Kaaanaaa " Meaning -- Was Not , Then -- Muhammad was a Died Prophet , False Prophet , Past Prophet , If "" Maaa Kaaanaaa "" Meaning -- Is Not , Then -- Quran is The Wrong Book , Not The God Book , If "" Maaa Kaaanaaa "" Meaning -- Was Not and Is Not ( Both are the same Meaning ) , Then -- All Islamic scholars are the Liar , Because of - Past is the Past , Past Never became Present , But -- Only For The God Sametime Was and is are the same meaning , Because of God Never die , God always Life , God has no time Limit , In the Quran -- kaaanaa Musa -- the Musa Was , Maaa kaaanaaa Ibraaheem"MUU -- The Ibraaheem Was Not , kaaanaa fira"UUN -- a Fira Was , Kaaanaaa Iblessa - The Ibless Was , in This Point-- Maaa Kaaanaaa Muhammad"UUN Meaning -- A Muhammad or A Mh-maaad Was Not ,
Who is the Muhammad in the Quran ??? See-- Quranic Grammar ;-- What is the Meaning of ""Tanween "" " [ UUUUN , IIIIN , AAAAN ] "" in English "" ???
See - Quranic Grammar - Tanween [ UUUUN , IIIIN , AAAAN ] in English "a " & an " "Tanween ,[ UUUN , IIIN , AAAN ] , Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAAN, See-In the Quran had no Word Call - "" Muhammad " But - Then Why In the Quran had or has "" Muhammad"UUUN " and " Muhammad"IIIN " ?? What is the Meaning of "" Muhammad"UUUN and Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAN , Muslim"AAAN , Muslim"UUUN , Mh-sinai"UUUN , Mh-Shrik "UUUN ,Calf-Fira"UUUN , "" ?? " Arabic Grammar and Quranic Grammar --- To Translate in English "" Yes -- ""UUN " , ""IIIN " , "" AAN " They are Not the Part of The Arabic Prophet's Name But -- If you Translate in English Then --- Indefinite Nouns ;---- When a Noun is used to refer to an Unspecified or Unidentified Person or thing , it is Called -- the indefinite noun , It usually has tanween [ "" UUN " , " IIIN " , and " AAN " ] at the end of the noun and is Translated in English as "" a " or "" an " Like -- A Man Arabic --- Rajul ( Common Noun ) and Rajul"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) , A Book Arabic ----- Kitaab ( Common Noun ) and Kitaab"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) , An Ahad Arabic ------ Ahad ( Common Noun ) and Ahad"UUN " ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) , A Boy Arabic ------ Walad ( Common Noun ) and Walad"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) , A Rasool Arabic ------- Rasool ( Common Noun ) and Rasool"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) , A Maaadi Arabic --------Maaad ( Common Noun ) and Maaad"UUN" ( Title - Indefinite Noun ) , A Mh-maaad Arabic ---Mh-maaad ( Common Noun ) and Mh-maaad"UUN" ( Title - Indefinite Noun ) , A Muhammad" Arabic --- Muhammad ( Common Noun ) and - Muhammad"UUN " [ Title -- Surah no-- 33 , Iaaat no-- 40 ] ( Indefinite Noun ) A Muhammad Arabic ---- Muhammad ( Common Noun ) and Muhammad"IIIN " [ Title -- Surah no-- 47 , Iaaat No-- 2 ] ( Indefinite Noun ) , A Muhammad Arabic ---- Muhammad ( Common Noun ) and Muhammad"AAAAN [ Title --In the Adhan , durud Sharif , Indefinite Noun ] A Jew Arabic --- Yaahoodiyy ( Common Noun ) and Yaahoodiyy"AAAN " [ 3 : 67 ] ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) , A Christin Arabic --- Nasaaraaniyy ( Common Noun ) and Nasraaniyy"AAAN [ 3 : 67 ] ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) A Muslim Arabic --- Muslim ( Common Noun ) Muslim"AAAAN , [ Title -- Indefinite Noun ] indeed---- In the Quran -- ""UUN " , " IIIN " and " AAN " Meaning -- " A " or " An " [ Indefinite Noun ] See -- [ surah No-28 , iaaat No--85 See - About Maaad or Maaadi ], See -- Al Meaning -- Meccan Arabic -- "" The " Al-Allah Ar-Rahmaan Ar Raheem meaning - The God The Most Gracious The Most Merciful , See -- El Meaning --- Egyptian Arabic "" The "" see -- Al - Allah Meaning -- The God [ Meccan Arabic ] , See -- El-Allah Meaning -- The God [ Egyptian Arabic ] , See -- Ellah - Raheem = Ellah -Ra-heem = Ellah -heem = Ellaheem = Ellooheem Meaning - The God God Most Merciful , -- Maaa Kaaanaa Ibraaaheem"MUU Yahoodiyy""AAAN " [ 3 : 67 ] Meaning -- The Ibrahim was not a Jew , In This Point -- Ibraaaheem"UU Meaning -- The Ibrahim , Kaaanaaa Meaning -- Was , [ 3 : 67 ] Qul Huwa allahu Ahad"UUUN [ Huwa Meaning -- Is ] Muhammad"IIIN Meaning -- A Muhammad ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) But Not a Person's Name , [ 47 : 2 ] Muhammad"UUUN Meaning -- A Muhammad ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) But not a person's Name ,[ 33 : 40 ] Muhammad"AAAN Meaning - A Muhammad ( Title - Indefinite Noun ) But Not a Person's Name , [ In The Adan & In The Duruad Sharif ] Yahoodiyy"AAAN Meaning -- A Jew ( Title -- Indefinite Nou ) [ 3 : 67 ] Nasraaniyy"AAN Meaning -- A Christian (Title -- Indefinite Noun ) [ 3 : 67 ] , Muslim"AAAN Meaning -- A Muslim ( Title -- Indefinite Noun )[ 3 : 67 ] ,
[ -- Muhammad"UUUN" , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAN ", Yahoodiyy"AAAN ", Nasraaniyy"AAAN " Mh-Sinai"UUUN , Mh-maaad"UUN , Mh-Shrik"UUUN , Mh-bashir"UUUN , Mh-man"UUUN , Meaning -- Not the person's name But the Title , Nation , Group , And indefinite Noun , [ A Muhammad or A Mh-maaad , a Jew , A Christian , A Mh-sinai or Mh-seeen , A Mh- Shriki , A Mh-bashir , , ],, In The Quran Have Many Prophet's Name Like -- Ibraaheem ( Name of the Prophet's ) -- But -- Ibraaheem"AAA or Ibraaaheem"UUU -- Meaning -- The Ibraaaheem , Ishaaq ( Name of the Prophet's ) -- But -- Ishaaq"AAA - Meaning - The Ishaaq , Yaqoob ( Name of the Prophet's ) -- But -- Yaqoob"AAA - or Yaqoob"UU -- Meaning -- The Yaqoob , In This Point -- If Muhammad is the Name of the Prophet 's Then -- Why In The Quran has No Word Call-- Muhammad"AAA or Muhammad"UUU Then Why Opposite Like-- Tanween [ UUUN , IIIN , AAAN ] Muhammad"UUUN , IIIN , AAAN ???? But -- In The Quran End of the name of the Prophet's has no "Tanween " -- Like- No -- Ibraaheem"UUUUN , Musa"UUUUN , Harrun"UUUUN , Issua"UUUUN , Dawood"UUUN , Solyman"UUUUN , But -- In the Quran has -- Nuha"UUUUN Meaning -- Nation of Nuha , Lut"UUUUN Meaning -- Nation of Lut , Add"UUUN Nation of Add , Fira"UUUN Nation of Fira , Mh-sinai"UUUN Nation of Mount-Sinai , Mh-maaad"UUUUN Meaning -- Nation of Mount-Maaadi ( 28 : 85 ) ,
Truly -- Muhammad of Meccan in the Quran Was Not Exist But in the Quran Surah no-47 , It was Named Called - Al-Qital ( The Fighting ) After That Top Islamic Scholars They Lied , They changed , They Were Put New Named Called - "" Muhammad , But In the Quran -- Surah or Chapter Name "" Muhammad "" and [ Quranic Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAN ] Both are Completely The Different and The Opposite from each Other , [[ Even --, Not Only That Quran Surah No-17 , It Was Called - Bani-Israel , Then - Top Islamic Scholars They Lied , They Were put New Named Al Isra ( The Journey by Night )],, &&&&&
Trinity vs Tawhid (Monotheism) (Christianity vs Islam) ------------------------------------- Trinity: Concept: One God in three distinct persons-Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This doctrine is complex and raises questions about how three entities can be one. Questions: - How can three distinct entities be one God? - Why did Jesus, if God, pray to the Father? - How can an eternal God have a "begotten" son? - What happens if the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit differ in will? Complexity: The doctrine's intricacies and potential contradictions can cause doubts and confusion. The divinity of the Holy Spirit was not clearly articulated by early scholars. ------------------------------------- Tawhid (Monotheism) : Concept: Tawhid, central to Islam, proclaims the absolute oneness of God (Allah). It asserts one Almighty God, beyond human imagination and incomparable. Attributes: God is eternal, self-sufficient, and the universe's sole creator and sustainer. Clarity: Tawhid aligns with common sense and human intuition, offering a rational approach free from divided doctrines' complexities. Harmony: Embracing Tawhid brings spiritual clarity and peace, providing a solid foundation for worship and devotion. ------------------------------------- Summary: Trinity: A complex doctrine with theological questions and potential contradictions. Tawhid: A clear, rational, and intuitive understanding of God's oneness, fostering a direct and profound connection with the divine. ------------------------------------- Tawhid offers the beauty and logic of uncompromised monotheism, bringing clarity and understanding to spiritual beliefs.
There is ZERO monotheism in Islam. Islam worships FOUR PAGAN gods. FYI, kissing a stone to expiate your sins can NEVER be a part of genuine monotheism.
@@zelihakoc884 , NO Christians worship the cross, and very few would think to kiss it. That is OPTIONAL in Christianity. Muslims are TOLD to kiss the Black Stone to expiate their sins, however. Big difference.
First, how is Allah "beyond human imagination and incomparable"? He's completely within human imagination and comparable to humans, because the concept of him lacks any divine mystery and complexity. He is simplistic. The Trinity is beyond human imagination and incomparable.
@@Ks872-h8j Despite our advancements, we are still unable to fully comprehend the vastness and depth of God's creation, both at the macro level (the universe) and the micro level (subatomic particles and life forms). This raises the question: if we cannot fully understand creation, how can we imagine or understand the Creator?
These are few verse from Quran regarding Jesus Christ and Mary. (peace be upon them) And mention, [O Muúammad], in the Book [the story of] Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place toward the east. And she took, in seclusion from them, a screen. Then We sent to her Our Angel [i.e., Gabriel], and he represented himself to her as a well-proportioned man. She said, "Indeed, I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, [so leave me], if you should be fearing of Allah." He said, "I am only the messenger of your Lord to give you [news of] a pure boy [i.e., son]." She said, "How can I have a boy while no man has touched me and I have not been unchaste?" He said, "Thus [it will be]; your Lord says, 'It is easy for Me, and We will make him a sign to the people and a mercy from Us. And it is a matter [already] decreed.' " So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, "Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten." But he called her from below her, "Do not grieve; your Lord has provided beneath you a stream. And shake toward you the trunk of the palm tree; it will drop upon you ripe, fresh dates. So eat and drink and be contented. And if you see from among humanity anyone, say, 'Indeed, I have vowed to the Most Merciful abstention, so I will not speak today to [any] man.' " Then she brought him to her people, carrying him. They said, "O Mary, you have certainly done a thing unprecedented. O sister [i.e., descendant] of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste." So she pointed to him. They said, "How can we speak to one who is in the cradle a child?" [Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet. And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and zakah as long as I remain alive And [made me] dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant. And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive." That is Jesus, the son of Mary - the word of truth about which they are in dispute. It is not [befitting] for AllŒh to take a son; exalted is He! When He decrees an affair, He only says to it, "Be," and it is. [Jesus said], "And indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path." Then the factions differed [concerning Jesus] from among them, so woe to those who disbelieved - from the scene of a tremendous Day. How [clearly] they will hear and see the Day they come to Us, but the wrongdoers today are in clear error. (Chapter Mary) (verse 25-38)
Cat vomit from the book of error-filled, fabricated cat vomit. Not impressed, especially since the stories about Jesus in the Qur'an were PLAGIARIZED from Christian folktales and HERETICAL Christian writings. The Qur'an is a CESSPOOL of errors, evils, contradictions, absurdities, plagiarized materials, and general incoherence. Whoever wrote that asinine little book was simply less intelligent than toothpaste. If you claim that God wrote it, you are calling God an idiot. That's blasphemy.
whatever you know about Jesus is extracted and interpreted from Holy Bible that was revealed upon Jesus Christ (peace be upon him). The holy bible was once the Guidance for Israelites, later on it was distorted and Corrupted. And today whatever you have in the name of Bible is Translation of the translation of the translation of translation of the translation and the Basic version that was copied from was compiled 300 years after Jesus Christ by numerous unknown personalities. Now you decide the authenticity of your New Testament.
Its crazy though if the hadiths are pure fiction, who and why invent such a despicable character as a prophet for their new religion? Ok, it has been quite a successful religion in terms of amount of followers but how could that have been predicted?
That's because he's despicable judging by the biblical standards. Muslims do not find such a man despicable. Yasir Qahdi said "...we don't lie for the truth, our prophet did this but yet he's the truth"
Yeah, the "principle of embarrassment" would suggest that if you were going to just make things up, then you wouldn't invent one of the most repugnant and evil people who have perhaps ever existed in history - when gauged by the metric of "long term negative impact on the world" I don't think you can actually point to a *worse* (apparent) figure throughout recorded human history - and you definitely wouldn't make that fictional person who was just the worst, you wouldn't make him "the enduring pattern of moral conduct we should all strive to emulate, forever". I get why Jay subscribes to the "Muhammad was purely a myth" position - it's pretty obvious that if he was real at all, then most of the specific details about his life as presented within his biographies are lies, or were real events moved in time/space to fit the fake narrative that Mecca was the cradle of civilization (when it has basically no history at all because of course it doesn't, it's in the middle of an enormous desert and doesn't have water), and there's a howling void of credible "proof" - but the fact that he's so, so terrible of a person - to the point where "learning what Islam actually teaches about his character" is by far and away the main "thing that makes Muslims doubt their faith" today (thanks ever so much for helpfully conducting that poll, Mohammad Hijab!) - just makes it hard to believe that he could be purely fictional.
@@matthewyoho5422 maybe it all started as a joke? Some scholars were bored and said Lets write this parody about a guy that is totally nuts and starts a religion to fit his own needs and then it took off in a totally unexpected way?
When I was still a Muslim, my life was so dark and miserable.
Lier 😂
I Left Islam long ago. I'm so happy.
Muhammad...a man so important even his followers hadn't heard of him until he'd been dead for 80 years.
@@AyyubAkhmad I study the historical facts of Islam. Not the lies told by the greedy Imams. If Muhammad was so important why did no one write about him when he was alive?
@@AyyubAkhmad Sorry, we know all we need to....such as the fact there is no evidence historically or in archaeology that this man existed
@@AyyubAkhmad shush
@@AyyubAkhmadfake
Well alHAMdulilies 😂😂😂😂
i am ex muslim from Malaysia 🇲🇾 love this CIRA❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@@AyyubAkhmad you mean Allah Dajjal 👹 🕋 , according to Hadith mention very clear about the dajjal arrival, dajjal will declare himself as a GOD in Islam, so Islam GOD name is ALLAH,no doubt Allah is dajjal 👹🕋
@@AyyubAkhmad using fear to threaten people. Typical religion of piss practice
@@AyyubAkhmad You have to scare and threaten people with violence to keep them in your religion which is very pathetic, 1slam is being exposed for the scam it is and millions of musl1ms are leaving your religion of death and lies and its beautiful
@@AyyubAkhmad😅. Why are you watching this video?
@@AyyubAkhmadOooooo! Scary! There's a ghost! BOO!👻
My family rejected me because I accepted Jesus as my Lord.
God is not accept Christianity. Your God is the God of Abraham
Jesus Christ will save you...
I've been a Muslim till the age of 63 imagine. I thank the lord for his mercy.
I am an ex Muslim ❤️
We love you, brother, and I'm glad you're making Heaven your home.
Congratulations brother ☦️❤️
@@AyyubAkhmadwe don't want Islamic jannah brothel.. 😜
@@AyyubAkhmad Wrong direction. 👻
@@AyyubAkhmadAll Muslims are bound for hell unless you do jihad.
No water in Mecca. No history
Mecca has a water source, the zam-zam well.
But no Agriculture, unlike T'aif wich is 50km east, an Oasis and is actully at a trading route, a center for culture and trade.
@@slippingsnake the Zam-Zam well is not enough to support huge populations. Maybe water collection from rain could be one of the practice to support the population
Zam Zam is a Miracle to Prove that
Islam is one and Only true faith...
@@prophetspath.319 Take off the aluminum hat
Son of God does not mean that God has a child in Christianity!
*what a mistake in the Qur'an!*
@@prophetspath.319 *what a mistake in the Qur'an!*
Allah himself testifies that he has a son and he is the son as Christians understand it! Only the Koran writer was too ignorant to know what Son of God means! Allah's word which created everything is Allah himself too! *The Word Allahs which created everything is the Son of God according to Christianity!*
This is very good informative historical research works. We are learning new things every time you make presentations and thank you for the good work. God bless you all.
@@AyyubAkhmad How? disprove it with objective verifiable historical archeaological or scientific proof
Otherwise your comment is just biased assertion and can be dismissed as just noise.
@@martinjackman2943
Which objective verifiable historical archeological or scientific proof do you refer? Is there anything historical or archeological or even scientific that has ever been proven in all of the standard islamic narrations (SIN) that you have knowledge of?
Historically there’s nothing absolutely to write about which exactly is what this presentation is all about.
What may be termed historical where nothing but fictions written by non-historians who wrote two to three centuries after the facts of events that were not in their vicinity. They lived thousands of miles away from the purported scene coming up with disjointed unbelievable, untrustworthy and unreliable stories.
Archeologically, not one thing ever been found anywhere that supports the SIN, rather the scenes are being sealed off with heavy slabs and concrete works over the purported areas where anything can be found. If you have any such evidence please supply and share such beautiful information with the world.
Scientifically, your very scholars and dawagandist have debunked most of the scientific claims as fabricated and untrue designed purposefully to lure and confuse the public. Please mention any one trusted scientific claim that you believe is true. Is your literature a scientific literature or a theological literature?
Stop wasting your time my friend please come home.
Wow Standard Islamic Narratives has only holes 🕳 🕳 🕳.. You brothers are truly widening the holes 🕳 🕳 🕳 superb 👌
God bless you.
You are destroy The myth of Islam
Embarrassing how bad the Standard Islamic Narrative is. Wake up people!
@@AyyubAkhmad
You mean the same one been debunked rmin this video 😂😂😂
@@AyyubAkhmad Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. No one comes unto the Father except through Him! If you don’t accept that He paid for your sins on the cross, you will pay for them in Perdition because you rejected the free offer of Salvation.
@@AyyubAkhmad Allohu akbar means Alloh is bigger not the greatest. the word Allohu akbar appeared in surah /chapter 29 al kabut verse 45 & Al anam 6 verse 78..
@@AyyubAkhmadyes millions of #Muslims #WokeUp and said #goodbye to Nonexistent Muhammad.. Lol 😂
@@AyyubAkhmad Its not even a proper religion just a bunch of silly stories from the Hijjaz exploited by violent warlords
A borrowed God with a borrowed name and stolen stories ranted by an unknown madman That's it .FAKE
I am ex muslim ❤❤❤
God bless you. We want you to be in Heaven with us.
Please help me save Japan 🇯🇵 from ☪️orona. Please go for "@NatsukiTakaama" an ex mzlm from Japan.
Now become a Christian.
God Bless You!!! All praise be to Jesus Christ of Nazareth!!!
@@AyyubAkhmad Says who? Mad MoMo and his glove puppet Allah?😀
Masterful! Brilliant job, Jay and Al Fadi!
It wasn't because of Videos, the Lord changed my life and made me leave Islam, made me realize everything when I was just 17. It was a sudden question at 3:00 AM - Who said other religions are wrong? then miracles happened, God showed me everything I needed to see, taught me everything I should have Learned. And Here I am, wearing my cross.
Thank you for this episode. Very informative. God bless! 🙏❤️
We love you brother, Jay and Alfadi.❤Keep doing the work of the Lord.🙏🏿
The real history the matrix doesn't want you to know
Are you from Japan?
I knew a graduate student who took a seminar on the origins of Islam, which he told us about. The seminar leader was an Orthodox Jewish doctoral student, so that may have influenced his views about how Islam was started up. I didn't attend any of the seminar sessions, and only know what I was told about it. The fellow who was, I guess, the seminar teacher, presented a theory, which he acknowledged to be an unproven theory, that the person identified as Mohammed, was probably either a minor tribal sheik or the leader of a group of outlaws, somewhere on the northern margin of the Arabian desert. This Mohammed had a group of warriors or robbers which he commanded, and after carrying out looting raids in towns on the northern margin of the desert, he started leading his gang or army southward into the desert, where there was no regular government and therefore no organized military forces. So, the people who might be resisting him, were something like ad hoc militias, who couldn't offer much resistance. However, he was making the raids in order to take whatever there was of value, in the desert, not to conquer territory. Since things of value there, didn't actually amount to much, what he did, was to take captives and steal livestock, which he took back north where he could sell them. In that era, a warrior's compensation was, partly, that he was allowed to loot in areas where the military force went. Since there wasn't much to loot in the desert, Mohammed hit on the idea of altering whatever religion his warriors or outlaws had, to a religion based on the idea that they could go to paradise if they fought to spread the religion, and if someone was killed while doing that, he would immediately go to paradise. As we know, a religious idea like that, worked very well for the Islamic religion in the seventh and eighth centuries. So, the theory was, that Mohammed, or whoever he was, wound up making a substantial income as a slave trader, and that could have been the basis of his financial success. I'm not sure whether, in the seminar, Mohammed was considered to have originated the theological details of Islam, or even whether he had much to do with the spread of Islam in areas outside the desert. I don't know for a fact that Mohammed was a major slave trader, but I guess that, in the seminar, it was at least suggested that he might have been one of the biggest slave traders of his day. Of course, an Orthodox Jew, and the seminar leader was not someone that I knew, would want to discredit the Islamic religion as much as possible. You might note that someone has said, that there have continuously been slaves in the Arabian peninsula, for at least the last three thousand years. I have no idea whether the seminar was based on any published research, but it is known that Mohammed both owned and sold slaves, according to accounts of his life. I think other theories were discussed in the seminar, this is the one I thought most interesting.
Was it not proven that Mecca or should we say Becca was in Petra in Jordan.
started in Petra. Moved. No big problem.
@@willhall4037 Many have no idea regarding Petra and being Becca this is a problem for those
It was on this very program that it was proved without every shadow of doubt that Mecca was in Petra.Todays Mecca is the fake Mecca. No archeological evidence suggesting humans even inhabited the desert called Mecca today.
Every word U say bring us closer to peace on earth by debunking "the religion of Pease". God bless all of U that do this important work. ♥
@@defenderoftruth3212 I am not sure what U talk about. I am not able to controll what happen in Heaven. That is the heaven of the true Jesus i mean. Are U talking about the religion of pease? BTW I am not Viking Tur......😀
@@defenderoftruth3212 I am not sure what U try to plant or start. I hope U are able to try to understand and that this video will lead u back to Jesus. I dont want to kritic u for Islam but it clear that so many people have been deceved and lied to and lead into a culture that destroy nation and people. Jesus is life. Jesus is waiting for u to listen to his word. Jesus is the light and by follow him U will have a vonderful life and all your famely and friends could have a vonderfull life to if they could only open your eyes.
An important distinction should be mentioned, namely, that the 'Arabs' were generally called 'Tayaye' in Syriac and 'Sarakenoi' in Koiné Greek. Contemporaneous Chinese records refer to the Tayaye rather than to Arabs. The 'tayaye d'mhmt' (Tayaye tribe of Mohammed) are living in southern Syria, not in the Hijaz.
gentlemen, well done🌹👍
'MUHAMMAD' was an HONORIFIC epithet similar to 'AUGUSTUS' (latin) or 'SEBASTOS' (greek) and may even be the Arabic version of that epithet. Mohammed is a literary invention and a composite character whose legends grew like other medieval legends such as those of King Arthur or Robin Hood or WIlliam Tell. Most of the legends were suppressed by al-Bukhari. The legends that remain are often mutually inconsistent. Why did al-Bukhari not get rid of those inconsistencies and contradictions.
Jesus saved me. Am Ex Muslim. But all those long how can you believe the person who did all sins en you fail to believe who's going the save the world. 😢
Please save Japan 🇯🇵. Japanese are being deceived by these 👳🏽.
@@AyyubAkhmad Are you talking about the same Ola that has two hands on his right side?
Amen.
🎯@@defenderoftruth3212 This is a sign of weak people they instantly stoop to personal attacks. This only proves that I was right. Genetic engineering will save our children from all defects. Allah fails. 🤢
@@defenderoftruth3212 I am afraid if my offspring will be born with 2 hamds on the right side and you will start to worship him.
I have a Mizrahi Jewish Background. I know Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic with its different branches and of course classical Arabic with the Levant variant. I am quite sure that MHMD was an exilarch title for the "מינים minim, dissident" Jews as it happens Nazarenes in the Metropolitanate of Beth Garmai (central Iraq) under the sasanian empire.
so the islamic muhammad is a heretical sectarian jew from central iraq?
You mean the Exliarch of Jews of iraq was called Muhammed??? Just as Jesus as called among christians as Muhammed???
Blown away by the sheer quality of the material, research done and the depths of knowledge present here
Hi gentlemen, would you please give the ugaritic reference of the quote MHMD "mahomed" thank you.
Amen to Jesus Christ
I think it would be really important to have a Muslim respond to this.
Their response is to change the subject or deny the evidence. Read through the comments here.
For what to lie, that's all they do. I guess it's fitting because satan is the father Of lies.
All they do is taqiyah
its like using the name kaiser or ceasar its a title for a leader and many recieve it or are called it
Very informative thank you
Muslims worse nightmare “the internet “ 😅
He exist but not Muhammad by name.
Today they consider muhammed satan
Can you guys debunk muhammeds letter to Heraclius?
Sure you can debunked but you can not debunk 2 Billion boy 2 Billion while your Christianity sinking your little boy i know you have night mare but first try clear your Issue with Jew then talk about islam
@@pishro09 that’s laughable. You don’t have any true numbers on actual Muslims until muslim countries remove the apostasy laws. You have no real data if people could lose their lives saying they aren’t Muslim.
@CIRAinternational what is your perspective about the "Birmingham Manusript"?
Pfander Films Jay Smith covered it recently.. it's on CZcams
Bless you and thanks
Great work,fellas but who is the person being referred to as “o prophet” in Quran?Can you kindly explain thank you
Make sure it is in the Arabic text because very often the translators add words to the text.
7:32 what is this “fali water”?
I think Dr Jay says 'when they brought ... finally water.'
We are fortunate that today we have sciences like anthropology, archelogy, etc. All the sciences born within the last 200 years, all the information gathering by scholars and piecing together of that info is a blessing. It is really remarkable we have content like this to watch. Thanks Al Fadi and Jay Smith for all the time and work put into these videos!
I am glad I saw this channel earlier BEFORE following my father's step of becoming a MUSLIM.
Ex-Muslim Here since 2012.
Where and we get lessons on this or books we can read and share with every one
Which one? There are quite a few
Thanks God for revealing the truth to me.
We must expose the Truth to Muslims in love and respect. Many millions are deceived, and Truth mingled with compassion must be implemented to persuade Muslims.
Shut up idol worshiper
I personally grew up gearing God, until I found Jesus and the real God.
Nothing to do with MHMD,but the kings of Hatra were known as King of the Arabs.And their kingdom was also called Arabaya.
It would seem that one of the attributes of the devil is a decided clumsiness.
Great stuff gentleman
I hope that you guys can improve on production.. use video editing software instead of slide shows.. make the maps more visible.. we will get better clarity about exactly what you are referring to.
We pray for Christians and all Jews. May our Almighty God protect Israel forever.
Modern syriac speakers in Turkey call muslims for Taaye, wonder if it has something to do with the context
A sincere question from a Christian brother: how do you explain the existence of Shia and Sunni Muslims, when the Islamic Mohammed never existed and therefore Ali didn’t either?
In the philippines is historical area..also google pointing the philippines as OPHIR..The i watch this vlog..muhammad...suddenly someone vlog .and researh..world bank..i read king prophet muhhamad..😂who depisot..i didnt heard prophet muhammad in the philppines..but why is wrtten .the philippines religion before is anitism..hindu. pagan.and many more..now 2015 they dig idols of hindu in agusan del sur..if u search..history of the philippines it connecting..THE SPANISH WIPE OUT THE HISTORY OF PHILIPPINES.. IS OPHIR..MAHARLIKA..
8:10 “Arabs of mhmd “ is could mean the followers of mhmd ! Muslim!!!😂
Religious personalities of any religion cannot be proven to have existed in reality let alone islamic.
Excellent content
Errors found in the Bible.
1. Creation accounts: The order of events and details in the creation narratives of Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 differ, including the creation of humans and animals.
2. Genealogy of Jesus: The genealogies of Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke present different names and lineages, leading to inconsistencies.
3. Timing of Jesus' death: The timing of Jesus' death differs between the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and the Gospel of John, causing discrepancies in the events leading up to his crucifixion.
4. Resurrection accounts: The Gospel accounts of the resurrection of Jesus contain differences in the details of who discovered the empty tomb and the events that followed.
5. Judas' death: The descriptions of Judas Iscariot's death in Matthew 27:5 and Acts 1:18-19 differ in the circumstances and outcome.
6. The fate of the righteous: Proverbs 12:28 states that "in the way of righteousness is life," while Ecclesiastes 9:5 suggests that "the dead know nothing" and have no reward or knowledge.
7. God's nature: There are passages that depict God as both all-loving and all-merciful, while others portray God as wrathful and vengeful, leading to apparent contradictions in God's character.
8. Historical inconsistencies: The accounts of historical events, such as the reigns of kings or the conquest of cities, may differ between different books or present challenges when compared to external historical records.
9. Justification by faith or works: The teachings of Paul in Romans and Galatians emphasize justification by faith, while James 2:24 states that "a person is justified by works and not by faith alone," potentially leading to a theological contradiction.
10. The nature of God's revelation: The understanding of God's revelation and the requirements for salvation may differ between different biblical passages, leading to diverse theological interpretations and potential contradictions.
11. God's visibility: Exodus 33:20 states that no one can see God's face and live, while Genesis 32:30 and Exodus 33:11 mention instances where people saw God face to face.
12. The order of creation: Genesis 1:11-13 states that plants were created before humans, while Genesis 2:4-9 suggests that humans were created before plants.
13. Age of Ahaziah: 2 Kings 8:26 states that Ahaziah was 22 years old when he became king, while 2 Chronicles 22:2 mentions that he was 42 years old.
14. Death of Goliath: 2 Samuel 21:19 mentions Elhanan killing Goliath, while 1 Samuel 17:50 attributes Goliath's death to David.
15. Resurrection appearances: The Gospel accounts of the resurrection appearances of Jesus provide varying details and sequences of events.
16. Sabbath observance: Exodus 20:8-11 commands strict Sabbath observance, while Jesus' actions and teachings in the New Testament sometimes appear to challenge Sabbath rules.
17. Jesus' cleansing of the Temple: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) place the event during Jesus' final week in Jerusalem, while the Gospel of John situates it at the beginning of Jesus' ministry.
18. The fate of Judas' field: Matthew 27:3-8 and Acts 1:18-19 provide differing accounts of what happened to the field that Judas acquired with the money he received for betraying Jesus.
19. Animal sacrifices: The book of Hebrews emphasizes that Jesus' sacrifice supersedes the need for animal sacrifices, while the book of Leviticus describes extensive rituals of animal sacrifice.
20. Inheritance laws: Numbers 27:8-11 and Numbers 36:8-9 present conflicting instructions regarding the inheritance rights of women.
21. The length of the Israelite exile: Jeremiah 25:11-12 prophesies a 70-year period of Babylonian exile, while Ezra 1:1-3 and other accounts suggest a different duration.
22. The order of Jesus' temptations: The order of temptations presented in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke during Jesus' wilderness experience differs.
23. Ascension of Jesus: The Gospel of Luke describes Jesus' ascension taking place on the same day as his resurrection, while the Gospel of Acts suggests a 40-day gap.
24. Instructions on divorce: Jesus' teachings on divorce in Matthew 19:9 seem stricter than the exceptions given in Mark 10:11-12 and Luke 16:18.
25. The fate of the righteous and the wicked: Proverbs 24:16 states that the righteous fall seven times but rise again, while Psalm 37:24 asserts that the righteous will not fall.
26. The number of angels at Jesus' tomb: The number of angels present at Jesus' tomb after his resurrection differs between the Gospel accounts.
26. Salvation by faith or works: The teachings of Paul in Romans emphasize salvation by faith, while James 2:14-26 emphasizes the importance of works.
28. Circumcision: The New Testament presents different teachings on the necessity and significance of circumcision for believers.
29. The birth narratives of Jesus: The Gospels of Matthew and Luke offer distinct accounts of Jesus' birth, including different genealogies, locations, and events.
30. The nature of God's forgiveness: In some passages, forgiveness is depicted as freely given by God, while in others, conditions or requirements are presented.
31. The flood account: The dimensions of Noah's ark and the number of animals brought on board differ between Genesis 6:15-16 and Genesis 7:2-3.
32. The origin of evil: Isaiah 45:7 states that God creates both light and darkness, peace and evil, while James 1:13 asserts that God cannot be tempted by evil.
33. The commandment to honor parents: Exodus 20:12 and Ephesians 6:2 instruct people to honor their parents, while Luke 14:26 suggests that discipleship requires hating one's parents.
34. The genealogy of Joseph: Matthew 1:16 lists Jacob as the father of Joseph, while Luke 3:23 names Heli as Joseph's father.
35. The fate of the righteous and the wicked: Proverbs 10:27 claims that the righteous will live long, while Ecclesiastes 7:15 suggests that the righteous perish prematurely.
36. The birthplace of Jesus: Matthew 2:1-6 indicates that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, while Luke 2:4-7 suggests that he was born in Nazareth.
37. Dietary restrictions: Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 provide different lists of clean and unclean animals.
38. The second commandment: Exodus 20:4-6 prohibits the making of any graven images, while Exodus 25:18-20 instructs the creation of cherubim images for the Ark of the Covenant.
39. The fate of King Saul: 1 Samuel 31:4-6 and 2 Samuel 1:8-10 offer differing accounts of King Saul's death.
40. The nature of God's wrath: Exodus 20:5 speaks of God's wrath lasting to the third and fourth generation, while Ezekiel 18:20 asserts that children will not be punished for their parents' sins.
41. The mode of baptism: The New Testament mentions both immersion (Acts 8:38) and pouring (Acts 2:17) as forms of baptism.
42. The birthright of Esau: Genesis 25:33-34 suggests that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of stew, while Hebrews 12:16 indicates that Esau sold it for a single meal.
43. The state of mind in death: Ecclesiastes 9:5 claims that the dead know nothing, while Luke 16:19-31 presents the story of the rich man and Lazarus with conscious existence after death.
44. The preaching of Jesus' message: Matthew 5:17 suggests that Jesus came to fulfill the law, while Matthew 5:21-22 presents him as teaching a higher standard than the law.
45. The timing of the crucifixion: Mark 15:25 indicates that Jesus was crucified at the third hour, while John 19:14-15 mentions the sixth hour.
46. The fate of Judas Iscariot: Matthew 27:5 suggests that Judas hanged himself, while Acts 1:18-19 indicates that he fell headlong and burst open.
47. The requirements for salvation: Acts 16:30-31 emphasizes faith as the requirement for salvation, while Acts 2:38 emphasizes repentance and baptism.
48. The identity of Jesus' paternal grandfather: Matthew 1:12 states that Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel, while Luke 3:27 lists Neri as his father.
49. The law of retaliation: Exodus 21:23-25 prescribes "an eye for an eye" but
instead respond to evil with goodness and love (Matthew 5:38-42).
50. Genealogy of Cainan: In Genesis 11:12, Shelah is listed as the son of Arphaxad, while in Luke 3:36, Shelah is the son of Cainan, not mentioned in the Genesis account.
I’m ex Muslim too .
Who care if you are x or y
@@defenderoftruth3212 you don’t know how hard I’m laughing right now and feel sympathy for you . Clown 🤡
@@pishro09 clown
Good for you 👍
Be careful what you wish for.
The Injeel, in Islamic tradition, refers to the original gospel or message given to Prophet Isa (Jesus) by God.
Muslims believe that this original message was pure and free of distortion.
However, it is believed that the current Gospels found in the New Testament are not the same as the original Injeel, as they have undergone changes over time.
One reason why the Injeel is considered no longer the same as the current Gospels is the process of textual transmission and translation.
The original Injeel was believed to have been delivered orally in Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus and his disciples. As the message was passed down, it was translated into Greek, the common language of the Eastern Mediterranean at the time.
This translation process, along with the passage of time and the lack of an official written record from Jesus himself, led to variations and alterations in the text.
Different Christian communities had different versions of the Gospels, and over time, these texts were compiled, edited, and sometimes harmonized, resulting in discrepancies and inconsistencies.
Another factor is the doctrinal changes and developments within early Christian communities. As Christianity spread, theological debates and councils led to the establishment of certain doctrines and the rejection of others.
These theological decisions influenced how the Gospels were interpreted and understood. For example, the concept of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus were not explicitly laid out in the earliest Christian texts but became central tenets of Christian doctrine over time.
This evolution of belief further distanced the content of the current Gospels from what Muslims believe was the original Injeel.
Additionally, the Gospels in the New Testament are attributed to different authors (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), none of whom were direct recipients of the original message.
These authors wrote their accounts several decades after the life of Jesus, relying on oral traditions and earlier sources. This gap between the life of Jesus and the writing of the Gospels introduces further uncertainty about the accuracy of the recorded message.
In summary, from an Islamic perspective, the Injeel was a divine revelation given to Jesus in Aramaic, and it was originally an oral message.
The current Gospels, written in Greek and influenced by early Christian theological developments, are considered to have diverged from this original revelation due to translation, textual transmission, and doctrinal changes over time.
Therefore, the Injeel as a pure and unaltered message is believed to no longer exist in the form found in the New Testament.
The name "Muhammad," meaning "the Praised One," was not unique to the Prophet of Islam and could refer to God or other figures. The interpretation of inscriptions bearing this name depends significantly on their context. It is crucial to distinguish between the common use of the term and its specific application to the Islamic prophet.
Thank you bro❤❤
Good video
The Bible underwent significant changes beginning with Constantine's involvement in the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Athanasius later compiled the Bible in 367 AD, selecting which scriptures to include or exclude.
In the 16th century, the introduction of the letter "J" led to a major revamp of the Bible. Names were altered: Yakob became Jacob, Yohana became John, Yusuf became Joseph, Yehuda became Judah, Yoel became Joel, Yonah became Jonah, Yehoyakim became Joachim, Yehoshua became Joshua, Yirmeyahu became Jeremiah, and Yeshua (originally Isa/Isho) became Jesus.
The changes did not stop there. The Bible has continued to undergo numerous revisions over the centuries, including modern times.
You are doing a very tough job
God bless you brother
Bible is the scripture that has been compiled for centuries, orally transmitted person to person without taking care of preservation of original text, narrators narrated in there own words,
So whatever mentioned in Bible is debatable.
whereas Original text of Quran is Preserved and won't ever be altered, its God's promise.
Further Languages in which Bible was revealed or initially recorded are either died or vanished centuries ago.
whereas Quranic Arabic is a Marvel of linguistic till today. won't ever Die or obsolete.
This video, and others like it, show that Mohammad was a title given to several people in the times preceding and during the Arab Revolution. Of particular note is the Jewish exilarchs.
Basically you have a messianic movement based upon the Jewish idea of the a warrior Messiah. The praised one. As you watch more of these videos, you will see there are a few Mohammads, of differing ethnicity and religion during this period.
The Quranic Mohammad is a composite of these people, placed in the Hijaz to give an Arab identity to the warrior Messiah. This is because the main people doing the fighting, dying, and protecting were Arab auxiliaries during the Roman-Sassanian war and in the Arab Revolution that immediately followed.
I would think it was the Umayyads who started this, as they created a new religion to compete with the Byzantine Orthodox faith. Islam is basically Anti-Trinitarianism Christianity, which was the dominant faith in the Roman Levant and Egypt. Creating an Arab quasi-messianic figure is the only real difference between the two.
These two also have videos proving there have been, and still are, multiple versions of the Quran. And that the poetry parts of it are lifted from Aramaic Christian hymns, as Christ had the title, "the praised one" in that language. I.e. Mohammad.
The Umayyads and Abbasid caliphates changed the person being referred to as MHMD from Jesus to an Arab religious freedom fighter in order to legitimize Arab rule (a minority) over the Aramaic and Persian subjects (majority.)
Quran is NOT the unchanged scriptures you profess them to be. A compilation of Christian poetry from the Nabaeteans mixed with Anti-trinitarian theology with an Arab figurehead. A perverted Christian theology.
Watch the videos from these guys and get educated. Or live in the Islamic world of pretend.
I assume you mean the books of the New Testament since we know the books of the Old Testament are preserved as they were in Jesus’ day because of the Dead Sea scrolls.
No you’re wrong about the text being compiled “for centuries” when the text of the gospels and acts were written by the apostles themselves and the thousands of manuscripts of these gospel are virtually identical. The epistles are also written by Paul and Peter.
Unlike the Quran which Uthman gathered and had 5 men pick what was true and what was false and burned all the rest. Meaning we don’t know how much of your Quran is lost.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@user-je8zx3xt4w Poor Christians uses emoji bcz of nothing left for argument
Thank you
So how do you tell a billion people there's no real Mohammed its just stories .
They ask evidence that it
They will say the bible is corrupt, how can God kill himself, Rebecca was 3.
So it seems that this prophet Mohammed fits into the description in chapter 13 of the St. John’s Revelation, so we have the liar prophet of the Beast identified!
Matew 24:3-36
Which Mathiw by the way
At 7:34 you say they brought ____ water. What's that word? It was unclear
it's "water"...American ' t' often sounds like 'd' ...
@@martinjackman2943no no, I mean the word he says before water. It sounds like furdy
Do you know when the water started coming in to Mecca?
@@FalconManBoy It's "finally" you're probably confused because Jay Smith inverted the word order..
Usually it's "finally, they brought water. or they brought water finally.
It's done in this order for emphasis sometimes but Jay is rushing his speech. (He could slow down a bit but I enjoy his enthusiasm!)
@@FalconManBoy Ther was a small well the zamzam ... (probably not the original which is in Petra ) enough for a few sheep and camels and maybe a little village..definitely not an ancient city .. Mecca is fake.
Amen John 14:6 And Jesus said into him; I am the Way the Truth and the Life No man comes unto the Father but by me ~
There is NO " Interfaith " ... There is One Faith ... Ephesians 4-5 One Lord One Faith One Baptism ~
Romans 10:17 So then Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God ~
There is One Faith... It is Not Islam Buddhism or Hinduism ...... John 8:58 Truly I tell You; Before Abraham was; I am ~
John 10:9 For the thief comes not but to steal kill and destroy 10 But I am come that ye might have life and have it more abundantly ~
Galatians 3:28 There is neither jew nor greek; there is neither bond or free; There is neither male nor female in Christ For ye are all One in Christ
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed and heirs according to the Promise ~
NOTE: Decades..The Papacy has been joined w/the fraternal Brotherhood Abu Dhabi headquarters ..leading false peace and unity world wide promoting an Interfaith ... Catholicism is not the True Church .... Rome has designed Vatican Center as a serpent in and out.. The altar head w/eyes and fangs in 24/7 Satan worship welcoming the AntiChrist ....
1John 2:22 who is a liar but he that denies Jesus is Christ? he is AntiChrist that denies the Father and the Son 23 he that denies the Son the same hath
not the Father; he that acknowledges the Son hath the Father also ~
Matthew 6:24 No one can serve two masters; either you will hate the one and love the other; or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other; you cannot serve
both God and money ~
God bless you in Jesus' name. Amen.
1. Christian Disagreements:
Highlight the significant theological disagreements in early Christianity regarding the nature of Jesus and the Trinity. Early Christian history saw numerous debates and councils, such as Nicaea (325 CE) and Constantinople (381 CE), which were convened to resolve these disputes. Even after these councils, various sects like Arianism, Nestorianism, and others continued to present differing views.
-------------------------------------
2. Islamic Consensus:
Contrast this with the relative theological unity in Islam. From its inception, core beliefs such as the oneness of God (Tawhid), the finality of the prophethood with Muhammad (s.a.w.), and the belief in the Day of Resurrection have remained consistent across all major Islamic sects. Despite differences in jurisprudence and certain theological interpretations, these core beliefs have been universally accepted.
-------------------------------------
**Key Islamic Beliefs**
1. Tawhid (Oneness of God):
Emphasize the Islamic doctrine of Tawhid, which asserts the absolute oneness and uniqueness of God. This concept has been a foundational and unifying belief in Islam from the very beginning.
-------------------------------------
2. Finality of Prophethood:
The belief in Muhammad (s.a.w.) as the last prophet is another core tenet that all Muslims agree upon. This finality of prophethood is clearly stated in the Quran (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:40) and has been a point of consensus among Muslims.
-------------------------------------
3. Day of Resurrection:
The belief in the Day of Judgment is also a fundamental part of Islamic theology, universally accepted by all Muslim sects. It is a key aspect of the faith that underscores accountability and the afterlife.
-------------------------------------
**Practical Implications**
1. Impact on Unity:
Point out that this theological consistency has contributed to a strong sense of unity within the Muslim community (Ummah) regarding core beliefs, despite cultural and sectarian diversity.
-------------------------------------
2. Contrast in Doctrine Evolution:
Highlight that while Christianity developed and formalized doctrines like the Trinity over centuries through councils and debates, Islamic theology regarding the nature of God and prophethood has remained consistent from the time of the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.).
-------------------------------------
**Supporting Texts**
1. Quranic Verses:
Cite Quranic verses that affirm these core beliefs:
- Tawhid: "Say, He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge" (Surah Al-Ikhlas 112:1-2).
-------------------------------------
- Finality of Prophethood: "Muhammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allah and the last of the prophets" (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:40).
-------------------------------------
- Day of Resurrection: "The Hour will certainly come; there is no doubt about it, yet most people do not believe" (Surah Ghafir 40:59).
-------------------------------------
Quran 43.81
If Allah had a Son Mohamad would be the first to worship him
Mark 15:39
“Truly this man was the Son of God!”
Quran 2.41 Pickthall
confirming that which ye *possess* already (of the Scripture)
how can he be fake and is mentioned in the quran?
Mohammad (Peace and Blessing be upon him) is real and true. These trolls are deceitful.
Prove it. Do a dialogue with Christian theologians. Please do it.I support you.😢
I don't think he's fake, but he has still brought a lot of harm to the world, and for some reason, his cult wants to bring everyone back to the Stone Age.
Super👏👌🏼
Try reading some Richard Carrier or Bart Ehrman- critical analysis is turning all these stories on their heads
The Bible contains contradictions and inconsistencies, such as differing accounts of the same events in the Gospels (e.g., Matthew 28:1-8 vs. Mark 16:1-8).
Many biblical stories and laws reflect the cultural and historical context of ancient societies, suggesting human authorship rather than divine dictation (e.g., Leviticus 25:44-46 on slavery).
Some parts of the Bible appear to endorse morally problematic behaviors, like slavery and genocide, which raises questions about divine morality (e.g., 1 Samuel 15:3).
1 Samuel 15:3 (ESV): "Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey." Is this God's words. It is promoting genocide!
There are numerous textual variants and alterations across different manuscripts, indicating a history of human editing and transmission errors (e.g., differences between the Septuagint and Masoretic Text).
The Bible includes mythological elements and stories similar to those found in other ancient Near Eastern cultures, implying shared human origins (e.g., the flood narrative in Genesis 6-9).
Scientific and historical inaccuracies in the Bible conflict with modern understanding, casting doubt on its divine inspiration (e.g., the creation account in Genesis 1).
The process of canonization was influenced by human decisions and political considerations, rather than a clear divine directive (e.g., the exclusion of certain apocryphal books).
Many ethical teachings in the Bible are interpreted differently by various denominations, leading to conflicting moral guidelines that seem unlikely if it were a unified divine message (e.g., differing views on divorce and remarriage in Matthew 19:9 vs. 1 Corinthians 7:10-11).
When Jesus says no alcohol and pork what do u do ?😂
Genesis (19) : 33 - 36
I am an Ex-lover of Al fadi.
So?
Hahahhahaha legit
why there is no consensus among Christians on core beliefs and are still debatable..?
1. Isn't that the divinity of Jesus is still debatable among Christians?
2. Isn't that there are varying interpretations and beliefs about Jesus' nature among different denominations and individuals?
3. Isn't that some Christians interpret the Bible literally while others see it as allegorical or symbolic?
4. Isn't that there are different Christian perspectives on salvation and how it is achieved?
5. Isn't that Christians understand the concept of the Trinity, and why do some denominations reject it?
6. Isn't that there are differing views among Christians regarding predestination and free will?
7. Isn't that various Christian denominations understand the nature and role of the Holy Spirit differently?
8. Isn't that some Christians believe in the necessity of baptism for salvation while others see it as symbolic?
9. Isn't that there are different Christian beliefs about the end times and the second coming of Jesus?
10. Isn't that Christians reconcile the existence of suffering and evil with a benevolent and omnipotent God differently?
11. Isn't that there are differing practices among Christian denominations regarding the ordination of women as clergy?
12. Isn't that Christians view the relationship between faith and works in the context of salvation differently?
13. Isn't that interpretations of the Eucharist (Holy Communion) vary among Christian denominations?
14. Isn't that there are differing Christian perspectives on the authority of the Pope and the structure of church leadership?
15. Isn't that Christians view the role of tradition versus scripture in guiding their beliefs and practices differently?
16. Isn't that there are varying beliefs about the nature of Jesus' resurrection among Christians?
17. Isn't that different Christian groups approach the concept of original sin and its impact on humanity differently?
18. Isn't that there is debate over the proper mode of baptism (immersion, sprinkling, pouring) among Christians?
19. Isn't that there are differing views among Christians on how to observe the Sabbath and whether it needs to be on Sunday?
20. Isn't that the role of Mary, the mother of Jesus, in the Christian faith is interpreted differently?
21. Isn't that Christians engage with and interpret modern scientific findings, such as evolution and the age of the earth, differently?
22. Isn't that there are different understandings among Christians about justification and sanctification in the life of a believer?
23. Isn't that Christians understand and respond to homosexuality and same-sex marriage differently?
24. Isn't that there are varying opinions among Christians on the appropriate role of social justice and activism within the faith?
25. Isn't that Christians approach interfaith dialogue and the salvation of those outside the Christian faith differently?
26. Isn't that there are varying views among Christians on the proper role of spiritual gifts (like speaking in tongues, prophecy, and healing) in the modern church?
27. Isn't that Christians approach wealth, poverty, and economic inequality differently?
28. Isn't that there are differing Christian stances on issues like abortion and euthanasia?
29. Isn't that Christians debate on how the church should engage with politics and government?
30. Isn't that the role of confession and repentance in the life of a Christian is understood differently?
31. Isn't that there are different interpretations among Christians on how to apply the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount?
32. Isn't that Christians have varying beliefs about the nature of the afterlife, including concepts of heaven, hell, and purgatory?
33. Isn't that Christians understand the relationship between the Old Testament and the New Testament differently?
34. Isn't that the importance and role of the sacraments in the Christian life are interpreted differently?
35. Isn't that Christians address historical and contemporary issues of racial reconciliation differently?
36. Isn't that Christians discern and follow God's will or calling in their life differently?
37. Isn't that Christians have different perspectives on the appropriate response to persecution and suffering for one's faith?
STOP LYING!!! ALL Christians accept the SAME set of core beliefs, the dogmata. We differ ONLY on doctrines, which are trivial.
Very nicely copied and pasted, However, every word of it is total useless and meaningless.
@@The_Last_Rick , notice the Muslim shuffle dance? This clown CANNOT deal with the topic of the video, so he jumps to attacking Christianity instead. Pathetic.
Everytime muslims cannot provide a rebuttal then what they do is change the topic. This is proof that islam is false and fragile, because there's no truth in it.
✝️❤️
Allah Praying: The claim that Allah prays to Prophet Muhammad is incorrect. In Islamic theology, Allah is the supreme deity who is not subject to human-like actions such as praying. When it is said that Allah sends blessings (salawat) upon the Prophet, it means that He bestows mercy and honor upon him. This is vastly different from the act of praying as understood in a human context
ALLAH PRAYS. That is the ONLY meaning of the word "sala". To "bless" is an entirely different word in Arabic - "barak".
@@mysotiras21 Are you an arab ?
Un jour j’ai posté un message: disant que le quran tombé du ciel en l’an 600! N’était qu’une invention humaine comme beaucoup d’autre religion. Et un muslim m’a répondu: comment tu expliques Adam et Ève! Je lui ai dit en retour une question: pourquoi le mode d emploi n’ai pas tombé dans leurs bras à Adam et Ève? Il fallu attendre l’an 600 😂 🎉 pitoyable religion…
le soleil se couche sur la terre vive Momo😂 soleil 110x la terre!
D’un point de vue terrestre on voit effectivement le soleil se coucher à l’horizon😉 c’était bien essayé Allah👈ne connais plus son système solaire, le savant fou 🤓
I challenge that no one can translate this Hebrew verse in any language along with its original essence remain intact..
וְהוּא מְחֹלָל מִפְּשָׁעֵנוּ מְדֻכָּא מֵעֲוֹנֹתֵינוּ מוּסַר שְׁלוֹמֵנוּ עָלָיו וּבַחֲבֻרָתוֹ נִרְפָּא לָנוּ"
Translation : "But he was pierced for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds, we are healed.
and then you claim that after translation of the translation of the translation of the translation........ what left.🙂
Preservation and Language Comparison: Bible vs. Quran
(Bible)
1. Compilation Over Centuries: The Bible was compiled over many centuries, involving numerous authors and oral traditions.
2. Oral Transmission: Initially, biblical texts were transmitted orally, which led to variations and potential alterations.
3. Debatable Texts: Due to the nature of its transmission and compilation, some biblical texts are subject to scholarly debate regarding their authenticity.
4. Language Extinction: Many original languages in which the Bible was revealed, such as Ancient Hebrew and Koine Greek, are no longer spoken languages. This complicates direct understanding and interpretation.
(Quran)
1. Preserved Original Text: The Quran has been preserved in its original form since its revelation in the 7th century.
2. Divine Promise: According to Islamic belief, Allah has promised the protection and preservation of the Quran, ensuring it remains unaltered.
3. Consistent Transmission: The Quran was written down and memorized by companions of the Prophet Muhammad, ensuring consistency in its transmission.
4. Living Language: Quranic Arabic remains a vibrant and studied language, with its linguistic structure considered a marvel. It is still used in religious, academic, and daily contexts by millions of people.
5. Universal Accessibility: Despite the passage of time, the language of the Quran is still accessible to readers and scholars worldwide, allowing for direct engagement with the text.
(Additional Points)
1. Textual Variants: The Bible exists in numerous versions and translations, each with slight differences, whereas the Quran has only one version across the Muslim world.
2. Manuscript Evidence: Thousands of biblical manuscripts exist, showing variations, whereas the Quran has uniform manuscripts dating back to the early Islamic period.
3. Linguistic Evolution: While biblical languages have evolved and in some cases become extinct, Quranic Arabic has maintained its classical form, studied and preserved by scholars.
4. Religious Practices: The recitation of the Quran in its original language is an integral part of Islamic worship, contributing to its preservation.
YAWN. According to EXPERTS, the Bible is the BEST-PRESERVED book in history. NO LEGITIMATE scholar says the same for the Qur'an. We have MOUNTAINS of evidence that the Qur'an has been EDITED many times, beginning with the Sanaa materials. Moreover, today there are 37 DIFFERENT Arabic versions of the Qur'an in circulation, with 93,000 variations between them. Those variations frequently CONTRADICT each other.
All the books from the bible come from prophets, witnesses, or 1st generation witness. The quran comes from one person who took stories, from the midrash, talmud, gnostic writings which are not canonized by Jewish or Christians authorities.
@@Verge63 how silly you are bro,
Bible was the word of God revealed upon Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), your own claim that Bible is been written by many challenges the health of purity of Bible.
whereas Quran was compiled in Prophet Muhammad's time and he was authority to do so. bcz he was the one who received Quran from Holy Spirit " Gabriel ".
@@Verge63 , Muhammad never actually existed. Chances are that the Qur'an was compiled by several anonymous authors, over a period of many decades. That is why the book is so wonky and self-contradicting.
@@dmisidia9359 , GOD DOES NOT WRITE BOOKS; humans do. Humans wrote the Bibel, INSPIRED by God. HUMANS wrote the Qur'an, inspired by SATAN. That is why the is a CESSPOOL of errors, evils, contradictions, absurdities, plagiarized materials, and general incoherence. Whoever wrote that asinine little book was simply less intelligent than toothpaste. If you claim that God wrote it, you are calling God an idiot. That's blasphemy.
Jesus spoke Aramaic, and the earliest church was in Palestine, specifically in Jerusalem, Israel.
Therefore, they likely spoke Hebrew.
However, by the time the New Testament was written, it was in Greek, resulting in a translation of Jesus' words before they were ever recorded.
Furthermore, the New Testament that endured the longest in the church was not in Greek but in Latin. This means another translation. It remained in Latin for a thousand years before being translated into German, and from German, it was translated into English, giving us the KJV.
Essentially, it's a translation of a translation of a translation of a translation of a translation.
You can never translate any content into another language without losing the actual message, tone of speech, or essence. If you read the history of the transformation of languages of the Bible, you will find that almost nothing is left from the original word of God.
Errors found in the Bible.
51. Duration of the Egyptian Captivity: Exodus 12:40 states that the Israelites were in Egypt for 430 years, whereas Galatians 3:17 suggests a period of 430 years from Abraham to the Law, implying a shorter stay in Egypt.
52. The number of Israelites leaving Egypt: Exodus 12:37 states that about 600,000 men left Egypt, which would suggest a much larger total population including women and children. This number is sometimes questioned based on logistical and historical grounds.
53. Destruction of Jericho: Archaeological evidence has been debated regarding the timing and existence of Jericho's walls as described in Joshua 6.
54. The age of Terah when Abraham was born: Genesis 11:26 mentions that Terah was 70 years old when he became the father of Abram (Abraham), but Genesis 11:32 and Genesis 12:4 suggest a discrepancy in Terah's age and the timing of Abraham's departure from Haran.
55. Jesus' lineage through Joseph: The Gospels of Matthew and Luke provide different genealogies for Jesus, complicating the understanding of His descent from David through Joseph, especially since Joseph is not considered His biological father in Christian doctrine.
56. David’s census: 2 Samuel 24:1 says God incited David to take a census of Israel, while 1 Chronicles 21:1 attributes this incitement to Satan.
57. The number of the beast: While most manuscripts of Revelation 13:18 record the number of the beast as 666, some ancient sources record it as 616, leading to debates about the correct number.
58. Saul’s interaction with the Witch of Endor: 1 Samuel 28:6 states that Saul could not receive answers from God, yet he seeks a medium in 1 Samuel 28:7-20, which is seen as a contradiction of divine communication rules.
59. The inscription on the cross: The Gospels differ on the exact wording of the inscription placed above Jesus on the cross. Matthew 27:37, Mark 15:26, Luke 23:38, and John 19:19-20 each provide slightly different versions.
60. The destruction of Tyre: Ezekiel 26 prophesies the complete destruction of Tyre, never to be rebuilt. However, Tyre has been rebuilt and exists to this day.
61. The death of Jesus' apostles: The New Testament does not consistently describe the deaths of all the apostles, leading to variations in tradition and historical records about their fates.
62. The length of Jesus' ministry: The Synoptic Gospels suggest a one-year ministry, while the Gospel of John indicates a ministry lasting at least three years, based on the number of Passovers mentioned.
63. The number of women at the tomb: The Gospels differ in the number and identity of the women who visited Jesus' tomb after His resurrection, creating discrepancies in the resurrection narrative.
64. Paul’s vision: In Acts 9:7, Paul’s companions heard the voice during his conversion experience, while Acts 22:9 states they did not hear the voice.
65. Ownership of the land of Canaan: The Bible mentions several times that God gave the land of Canaan to the Israelites as an eternal inheritance, yet later historical and biblical texts describe the land being taken by other nations or occupied by foreign powers.
66. Judas’ remorse and repayment: In Matthew 27:3-10, Judas returns the 30 pieces of silver to the chief priests before hanging himself. Acts 1:18-19, however, does not mention this return of money but describes Judas buying a field with the payment and dying there.
67. Duration of reigns of kings: There are discrepancies between Kings and Chronicles regarding the ages and reigns of several kings of Judah and Israel, such as the lengths of reigns and the ages at which they began to reign.
68. Paul and the Law: In Acts 21:24-26, Paul participates in Jewish purification rituals, which some see as inconsistent with his teachings in his epistles about freedom from the Law for Gentile converts.
69. Discrepancies in genealogical lists: Various genealogical records, such as those in Genesis, Chronicles, Ezra, and the Gospels, sometimes show different names and lineages, leading to questions about their accuracy and consistency.
70. Timing of the birth of Jesus: The Gospels of Matthew and Luke differ in their accounts of the timeline surrounding Jesus' birth. Matthew mentions the reign of King Herod, while Luke places it during the census of Quirinius, creating a potential chronological discrepancy.
71. Number of years between the Exodus and the building of Solomon's Temple: 1 Kings 6:1 states that 480 years passed between the Exodus and the construction of the Temple, but other biblical chronologies suggest a different timeline.
72. The death of Ahaziah: In 2 Kings 9:27-28, Ahaziah is reported to have died at Megiddo, while 2 Chronicles 22:9 says he was found in Samaria and brought to Jerusalem, where he died.
73. Location of Jesus' early ministry: The Gospels sometimes differ on the specific locations of Jesus' activities, such as whether he was in Capernaum, Nazareth, or another location.
74. The number of animals in Noah's Ark: Genesis 6:19-20 and Genesis 7:2-3 differ on whether Noah was instructed to bring two of each kind of animal or seven pairs of clean animals and one pair of unclean animals.
75. The genealogy of Moses: Exodus 6:20 lists Amram as Moses' father, but 1 Chronicles 6:1-3 gives a slightly different lineage.
76. The number of Israelites slain by the Levites: Exodus 32:28 states that the Levites killed about 3,000 men after the golden calf incident, while 1 Corinthians 10:8 mentions 23,000 fell in one day.
77. The number of years in the wilderness: Deuteronomy 2:14 mentions 38 years of wandering after the Kadesh-Barnea incident, while Numbers 14:33-34 and Acts 13:18 suggest 40 years.
78. The location of Mount Sinai: The traditional identification of Mount Sinai's location varies, and there is debate over the exact historical and geographical site.
79. The date of Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem: The dates of the siege in 2 Kings and Jeremiah differ, causing confusion over the timeline of events.
80. Paul's journey to Jerusalem: Acts 15:2-4 describes Paul's journey to Jerusalem for the Council, while Galatians 2:1-2 provides a different account and reason for the trip.
81. The law regarding sacrifices and offerings: There are variations in the regulations about sacrifices and offerings between the books of Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
82. David's mighty men: The list of David's mighty men in 2 Samuel 23:8-39 and 1 Chronicles 11:10-47 shows differences in names and numbers.
83. The plagues of Egypt: The sequence and descriptions of the plagues in Exodus sometimes differ in detail and emphasis, leading to variations in interpretation.
84. The fall of Samaria: The timelines and accounts of the fall of Samaria in 2 Kings 17 and 18 and other historical sources show discrepancies in dates and events.
85. The role of angels: Different passages depict varying roles and actions of angels, leading to questions about their nature and function.
86. The presence of evil spirits: Some passages attribute actions to evil spirits or Satan, while others suggest direct divine involvement, creating interpretative challenges.
87. The structure of the Tabernacle: The descriptions of the Tabernacle's design and construction in Exodus vary in detail and measurements.
88. *lThe genealogies in Genesis: The genealogical lists in Genesis 4, 5, and 10 sometimes show different lineages and names.
89. The laws of purity and impurity: The laws regarding ritual purity and impurity in Leviticus and Deuteronomy sometimes present different regulations.
90. The nature of prophetic messages: Prophecies in the Old Testament sometimes appear conditional, while others are presented as absolute, creating interpretative challenges.
91. The use of the term 'son of God': The term 'son of God' is used in various ways in the Old and New Testaments, leading to different theological understandings.
92. The nature of the Messiah: Different Old Testament passages present varying pictures of the Messiah, leading to diverse interpretations in Jewish and Christian traditions.
93. The role of women in the early Church: The New Testament presents differing views on the roles of women in the Church, as seen in Paul's letters.
94. The laws of war and conquest: The Old Testament presents different instructions and regulations for warfare and conquest, particularly in Deuteronomy and Joshua.
95. The structure and content of the Psalms: The numbering and content of the Psalms vary between the Hebrew, Greek (Septuagint), and Latin (Vulgate) versions.
96. The nature of the Holy Spirit: The descriptions and roles of the Holy Spirit vary between the Old and New Testaments, leading to different theological understandings.
97. The timing of the Last Supper: The Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John present different timelines for the Last Supper and the events leading up to Jesus' crucifixion.
98. The genealogy of the patriarchs: The genealogies of the patriarchs in Genesis 5 and 11 differ in the ages and lifespans of the individuals.
99. The nature of God's covenant with Israel: The nature and terms of God's covenant with Israel are presented differently in various parts of the Old Testament.
100. The role of the Law in the New Testament: The role and interpretation of the Mosaic Law in the New Testament vary between different authors and books, leading to theological debates.
These are examples of perceived discrepancies or contradictions in the Bible that have been the subject of discussion and debate among scholars, theologians, and critics. Interpretations and understandings of these texts can vary widely depending on one's religious or academic perspective.
Muslims claim Muhammad's prophecy in the Bible vide Deuteronomy 18: 18 does not refer to Muhammad. Be fair don't cherry pick random verses of the Bible. There is no prophecy of Muhammad in the Bible.😂
@@hdl135605
The interpretation of Deuteronomy 18:18 as a prophecy of Muhammad is a perspective held by many Muslims based on the belief that this verse refers to a prophet who would come from the brethren of the Israelites, interpreted by them as referring to the descendants of Ishmael, and thus Muhammad.
The verse says, "I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him."
Christians traditionally interpret this verse as referring to Jesus, not Muhammad.
They argue that the description of a prophet like Moses fits Jesus in terms of his mission, teachings, and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies.
The term "brothers" is often understood within the Christian tradition as referring to the Israelites, not the Ishmaelites.
The claim that there is no prophecy of Muhammad in the Bible depends on one’s religious perspective and interpretive approach.
Muslims see continuity between the Quran and earlier scriptures, while Christians typically do not view the Quran as a continuation of the biblical narrative.
Whether Deuteronomy 18:18 refers to Muhammad or Jesus is a matter of interpretation rooted in theological differences between Islam and Christianity.
Neither side is likely to convince the other through debate, as these interpretations are deeply tied to faith and religious identity.
@@hdl135605
Genesis 21:13 states, "And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed." This verse is part of the story of Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar, which centers around the birth of Isaac and Ishmael.
In the broader narrative, God had promised Abraham that he would be the father of many nations, a promise that was first fulfilled through the birth of his son Isaac with Sarah. However, before Isaac was born, Abraham had a son named Ishmael with Hagar, Sarah's Egyptian maidservant. After Isaac's birth, Sarah asked Abraham to send Hagar and Ishmael away because she did not want Ishmael to share in Isaac's inheritance.
Despite Sarah's demand, Abraham was troubled by the idea of sending his son Ishmael away. In response, God reassured Abraham in Genesis 21:12-13, telling him not to be distressed because Isaac would be the one through whom Abraham's line would be established, but also that Ishmael would not be forgotten. God promised to make Ishmael into a nation as well, because he too was Abraham's son.
The significance of this verse lies in the fact that it acknowledges Ishmael's status as Abraham's son and underscores God's promise to bless him and make a nation of his descendants, despite the fact that the covenant with Abraham would be fulfilled through Isaac. This verse is often interpreted as the biblical foundation for the belief that Ishmael is the forefather of the Arab nations, with his descendants eventually becoming prominent in the Islamic tradition.
In Genesis 16:3, it is stated, "So after Abram had lived ten years in the land of Canaan, Sarai, Abram's wife, took Hagar the Egyptian, her servant, and gave her to Abram her husband as a wife." This passage explicitly refers to Hagar being given to Abraham as a wife, indicating her status. Although Hagar was initially a servant, she was elevated to the status of a wife in this context.
Additionally, in Genesis 16:4, it mentions that Abraham "went in to Hagar, and she conceived." The act of taking Hagar as a wife is reinforced here by the fact that she bore a child for Abraham, which was a significant aspect of a marital relationship in that cultural context.
Thus, these verses support the claim that Hagar was indeed considered a wife of Abraham, even though her initial status was that of a servant.
This narrative highlights God's faithfulness and His commitment to His promises, ensuring that both of Abraham's sons, Isaac and Ishmael, would have a significant legacy, though the covenant would continue through Isaac.
@@hdl135605
In Christianity, certain rules and regulations outlined in the Bible, particularly in the Old Testament, are not universally observed by all Christians today.
For example, the instruction for women to cover their heads while praying, as mentioned in 1 Corinthians 11, is not commonly practiced in many modern Christian denominations.
This was once a widespread practice, reflecting cultural norms of modesty, but over time, interpretations have evolved, and many Christians now view it as a cultural directive rather than a timeless mandate.
Similarly, dietary laws from the Old Testament, such as the prohibition against eating pork, are not followed by most Christians. In the New Testament, particularly in the writings of Paul and the vision of Peter in Acts 10, there is a shift away from these dietary restrictions.
Christians believe that through Christ, they are not bound by the ritual and dietary laws of the Old Testament, as these were specific to the covenant between God and Israel, while the new covenant through Jesus emphasizes faith and spiritual purity over ritual observance.
Jesus himself observed many of the practices outlined in the Old Testament. He prayed with his face touching the ground, as described in Matthew 26:39, which reflects a posture of deep humility and submission to God.
Jesus also practiced kosher dietary laws and was circumcised according to Jewish tradition, as recorded in Luke 2:21. These actions show that Jesus adhered to the Jewish laws and customs of his time.
The issue of idolatry is more complex. The Ten Commandments clearly forbid the worship of idols or images, which remains a core principle in Christianity.
However, the interpretation of what constitutes idolatry can vary. For instance, some Christian denominations use images or statues as aids to worship, which they believe are not idols but rather representations that help focus devotion.
Other Christians, particularly those in Protestant traditions, may avoid such practices altogether, viewing any physical representation in worship as potentially idolatrous.
These examples illustrate how Christian practices have adapted over time, influenced by cultural, theological, and historical developments.
While some commands are seen as eternal moral laws, others are understood in the context of their time and are interpreted differently in light of the New Testament teachings and the broader Christian understanding of faith.
Islam is a false Prophet's religion , because of "" Maaa Kaaanaaa "" Meaning [ ( See-3 :67 ) (See-3 : 93 ) ( See-44 :31 ) ( See-2 : 34 ) ( See-33 :69 ) ( See- 33 : 40 ) ( See- 19 : 13 ) ] , ???
If "" Maaa Kaaanaaa " Meaning -- Was Not , Then -- Muhammad was a Died Prophet , False Prophet , Past Prophet ,
If "" Maaa Kaaanaaa "" Meaning -- Is Not , Then -- Quran is The Wrong Book , Not The God Book ,
If "" Maaa Kaaanaaa "" Meaning -- Was Not and Is Not ( Both are the same Meaning ) , Then -- All Islamic scholars are the Liar ,
Because of - Past is the Past , Past Never became Present , But -- Only For The God Sametime Was and is are the same meaning , Because of God Never die , God always Life , God has no time Limit ,
In the Quran -- kaaanaa Musa -- the Musa Was , Maaa kaaanaaa Ibraaheem"MUU -- The Ibraaheem Was Not , kaaanaa fira"UUN -- a Fira Was , Kaaanaaa Iblessa - The Ibless Was ,
in This Point-- Maaa Kaaanaaa Muhammad"UUN Meaning -- A Muhammad or A Mh-maaad Was Not ,
Who is the Muhammad in the Quran ???
See-- Quranic Grammar ;-- What is the Meaning of ""Tanween "" " [ UUUUN , IIIIN , AAAAN ] "" in English "" ???
See - Quranic Grammar - Tanween [ UUUUN , IIIIN , AAAAN ] in English "a " & an "
"Tanween ,[ UUUN , IIIN , AAAN ] , Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAAN,
See-In the Quran had no Word Call - "" Muhammad " But - Then Why In the Quran had or has "" Muhammad"UUUN " and " Muhammad"IIIN " ?? What is the Meaning of "" Muhammad"UUUN and Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAN , Muslim"AAAN , Muslim"UUUN , Mh-sinai"UUUN , Mh-Shrik "UUUN ,Calf-Fira"UUUN , "" ??
" Arabic Grammar and Quranic Grammar --- To Translate in English "" Yes -- ""UUN " , ""IIIN " , "" AAN " They are Not the Part of The Arabic Prophet's Name But -- If you Translate in English Then ---
Indefinite Nouns ;----
When a Noun is used to refer to an Unspecified or Unidentified Person or thing , it is Called -- the indefinite noun , It usually has tanween [ "" UUN " , " IIIN " , and " AAN " ] at the end of the noun and is Translated in English as "" a " or "" an "
Like -- A Man Arabic --- Rajul ( Common Noun ) and Rajul"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Book Arabic ----- Kitaab ( Common Noun ) and Kitaab"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) ,
An Ahad Arabic ------ Ahad ( Common Noun ) and Ahad"UUN " ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Boy Arabic ------ Walad ( Common Noun ) and Walad"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Rasool Arabic ------- Rasool ( Common Noun ) and Rasool"UUN" ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Maaadi Arabic --------Maaad ( Common Noun ) and Maaad"UUN" ( Title - Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Mh-maaad Arabic ---Mh-maaad ( Common Noun ) and Mh-maaad"UUN" ( Title - Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Muhammad" Arabic --- Muhammad ( Common Noun ) and - Muhammad"UUN " [ Title -- Surah no-- 33 , Iaaat no-- 40 ] ( Indefinite Noun )
A Muhammad Arabic ---- Muhammad ( Common Noun ) and Muhammad"IIIN " [ Title -- Surah no-- 47 , Iaaat No-- 2 ] ( Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Muhammad Arabic ---- Muhammad ( Common Noun ) and Muhammad"AAAAN [ Title --In the Adhan , durud Sharif , Indefinite Noun ]
A Jew Arabic --- Yaahoodiyy ( Common Noun ) and Yaahoodiyy"AAAN " [ 3 : 67 ] ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) ,
A Christin Arabic --- Nasaaraaniyy ( Common Noun ) and Nasraaniyy"AAAN [ 3 : 67 ] ( Title -- Indefinite Noun )
A Muslim Arabic --- Muslim ( Common Noun ) Muslim"AAAAN , [ Title -- Indefinite Noun ]
indeed---- In the Quran -- ""UUN " , " IIIN " and " AAN " Meaning -- " A " or " An " [ Indefinite Noun ]
See -- [ surah No-28 , iaaat No--85 See - About Maaad or Maaadi ],
See -- Al Meaning -- Meccan Arabic -- "" The "
Al-Allah Ar-Rahmaan Ar Raheem meaning - The God The Most Gracious The Most Merciful ,
See -- El Meaning --- Egyptian Arabic "" The ""
see -- Al - Allah Meaning -- The God [ Meccan Arabic ] ,
See -- El-Allah Meaning -- The God [ Egyptian Arabic ] ,
See -- Ellah - Raheem = Ellah -Ra-heem = Ellah -heem = Ellaheem = Ellooheem Meaning - The God God Most Merciful ,
-- Maaa Kaaanaa Ibraaaheem"MUU Yahoodiyy""AAAN " [ 3 : 67 ] Meaning -- The Ibrahim was not a Jew ,
In This Point -- Ibraaaheem"UU Meaning -- The Ibrahim ,
Kaaanaaa Meaning -- Was , [ 3 : 67 ] Qul Huwa allahu Ahad"UUUN [ Huwa Meaning -- Is ]
Muhammad"IIIN Meaning -- A Muhammad ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) But Not a Person's Name , [ 47 : 2 ]
Muhammad"UUUN Meaning -- A Muhammad ( Title -- Indefinite Noun ) But not a person's Name ,[ 33 : 40 ]
Muhammad"AAAN Meaning - A Muhammad ( Title - Indefinite Noun ) But Not a Person's Name , [ In The Adan & In The Duruad Sharif ]
Yahoodiyy"AAAN Meaning -- A Jew ( Title -- Indefinite Nou ) [ 3 : 67 ]
Nasraaniyy"AAN Meaning -- A Christian (Title -- Indefinite Noun ) [ 3 : 67 ] ,
Muslim"AAAN Meaning -- A Muslim ( Title -- Indefinite Noun )[ 3 : 67 ] ,
[ -- Muhammad"UUUN" , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAN ", Yahoodiyy"AAAN ", Nasraaniyy"AAAN " Mh-Sinai"UUUN , Mh-maaad"UUN , Mh-Shrik"UUUN , Mh-bashir"UUUN , Mh-man"UUUN , Meaning -- Not the person's name But the Title , Nation , Group , And indefinite Noun , [ A Muhammad or A Mh-maaad , a Jew , A Christian , A Mh-sinai or Mh-seeen , A Mh- Shriki , A Mh-bashir , , ],,
In The Quran Have Many Prophet's Name Like --
Ibraaheem ( Name of the Prophet's ) -- But -- Ibraaheem"AAA or Ibraaaheem"UUU -- Meaning -- The Ibraaaheem ,
Ishaaq ( Name of the Prophet's ) -- But -- Ishaaq"AAA - Meaning - The Ishaaq ,
Yaqoob ( Name of the Prophet's ) -- But -- Yaqoob"AAA - or Yaqoob"UU -- Meaning -- The Yaqoob ,
In This Point -- If Muhammad is the Name of the Prophet 's Then -- Why In The Quran has No Word Call-- Muhammad"AAA or Muhammad"UUU
Then Why Opposite Like-- Tanween [ UUUN , IIIN , AAAN ] Muhammad"UUUN , IIIN , AAAN ????
But -- In The Quran End of the name of the Prophet's has no "Tanween " -- Like- No -- Ibraaheem"UUUUN , Musa"UUUUN , Harrun"UUUUN , Issua"UUUUN , Dawood"UUUN , Solyman"UUUUN ,
But -- In the Quran has -- Nuha"UUUUN Meaning -- Nation of Nuha , Lut"UUUUN Meaning -- Nation of Lut , Add"UUUN Nation of Add , Fira"UUUN Nation of Fira , Mh-sinai"UUUN Nation of Mount-Sinai , Mh-maaad"UUUUN Meaning -- Nation of Mount-Maaadi ( 28 : 85 ) ,
Truly -- Muhammad of Meccan in the Quran Was Not Exist But in the Quran Surah no-47 , It was Named Called - Al-Qital ( The Fighting ) After That Top Islamic Scholars They Lied , They changed , They Were Put New Named Called - "" Muhammad , But In the Quran -- Surah or Chapter Name "" Muhammad "" and [ Quranic Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAN ] Both are Completely The Different and The Opposite from each Other ,
[[ Even --, Not Only That Quran Surah No-17 , It Was Called - Bani-Israel , Then - Top Islamic Scholars They Lied , They Were put New Named Al Isra ( The Journey by Night )],,
&&&&&
Barking barking barking please Sheeps are sleeping
Trinity vs Tawhid (Monotheism)
(Christianity vs Islam)
-------------------------------------
Trinity:
Concept: One God in three distinct persons-Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This doctrine is complex and raises questions about how three entities can be one.
Questions:
- How can three distinct entities be one God?
- Why did Jesus, if God, pray to the Father?
- How can an eternal God have a "begotten" son?
- What happens if the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit differ in will?
Complexity: The doctrine's intricacies and potential contradictions can cause doubts and confusion. The divinity of the Holy Spirit was not clearly articulated by early scholars.
-------------------------------------
Tawhid (Monotheism) :
Concept: Tawhid, central to Islam, proclaims the absolute oneness of God (Allah). It asserts one Almighty God, beyond human imagination and incomparable.
Attributes: God is eternal, self-sufficient, and the universe's sole creator and sustainer.
Clarity: Tawhid aligns with common sense and human intuition, offering a rational approach free from divided doctrines' complexities.
Harmony: Embracing Tawhid brings spiritual clarity and peace, providing a solid foundation for worship and devotion.
-------------------------------------
Summary:
Trinity: A complex doctrine with theological questions and potential contradictions.
Tawhid: A clear, rational, and intuitive understanding of God's oneness, fostering a direct and profound connection with the divine.
-------------------------------------
Tawhid offers the beauty and logic of uncompromised monotheism, bringing clarity and understanding to spiritual beliefs.
There is ZERO monotheism in Islam. Islam worships FOUR PAGAN gods. FYI, kissing a stone to expiate your sins can NEVER be a part of genuine monotheism.
@@mysotiras21why worship the cross, and kissing the cross 😂
@@zelihakoc884 , NO Christians worship the cross, and very few would think to kiss it. That is OPTIONAL in Christianity. Muslims are TOLD to kiss the Black Stone to expiate their sins, however. Big difference.
First, how is Allah "beyond human imagination and incomparable"? He's completely within human imagination and comparable to humans, because the concept of him lacks any divine mystery and complexity. He is simplistic.
The Trinity is beyond human imagination and incomparable.
@@Ks872-h8j Despite our advancements, we are still unable to fully comprehend the vastness and depth of God's creation, both at the macro level (the universe) and the micro level (subatomic particles and life forms). This raises the question: if we cannot fully understand creation, how can we imagine or understand the Creator?
So Islam is a fairytale from 1001 nights
These are few verse from Quran regarding Jesus Christ and Mary. (peace be upon them)
And mention, [O Muúammad], in the Book [the story of] Mary,
when she withdrew from her family to a place toward the east.
And she took, in seclusion from them, a screen. Then We sent to her Our Angel [i.e., Gabriel], and he represented himself to her as a well-proportioned man.
She said, "Indeed, I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, [so leave me], if you should be fearing of Allah."
He said, "I am only the messenger of your Lord to give you [news of] a pure boy [i.e., son]."
She said, "How can I have a boy while no man has touched me and I have not been unchaste?"
He said, "Thus [it will be]; your Lord says, 'It is easy for Me, and We will make him a sign to the people and a mercy from Us. And it is a matter [already] decreed.' "
So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place.
And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, "Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten."
But he called her from below her, "Do not grieve; your Lord has provided beneath you a stream.
And shake toward you the trunk of the palm tree; it will drop upon you ripe, fresh dates.
So eat and drink and be contented. And if you see from among humanity anyone, say, 'Indeed, I have vowed to the Most Merciful abstention, so I will not speak today to [any] man.' "
Then she brought him to her people, carrying him. They said, "O Mary, you have certainly done a thing unprecedented.
O sister [i.e., descendant] of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste."
So she pointed to him. They said, "How can we speak to one who is in the cradle a child?"
[Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet.
And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and zakah as long as I remain alive
And [made me] dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant.
And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive."
That is Jesus, the son of Mary - the word of truth about which they are in dispute.
It is not [befitting] for AllŒh to take a son; exalted is He!
When He decrees an affair, He only says to it, "Be," and it is.
[Jesus said], "And indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path."
Then the factions differed [concerning Jesus] from among them, so woe to those who disbelieved - from the scene of a tremendous Day.
How [clearly] they will hear and see the Day they come to Us, but the wrongdoers today are in clear error.
(Chapter Mary)
(verse 25-38)
Cat vomit from the book of error-filled, fabricated cat vomit. Not impressed, especially since the stories about Jesus in the Qur'an were PLAGIARIZED from Christian folktales and HERETICAL Christian writings. The Qur'an is a CESSPOOL of errors, evils, contradictions, absurdities, plagiarized materials, and general incoherence. Whoever wrote that asinine little book was simply less intelligent than toothpaste. If you claim that God wrote it, you are calling God an idiot. That's blasphemy.
whatever you know about Jesus is extracted and interpreted from Holy Bible that was revealed upon Jesus Christ (peace be upon him). The holy bible was once the Guidance for Israelites, later on it was distorted and Corrupted. And today whatever you have in the name of Bible is Translation of the translation of the translation of translation of the translation and the Basic version that was copied from was compiled 300 years after Jesus Christ by numerous unknown personalities.
Now you decide the authenticity of your New Testament.
Muhammad Rihanna music: tatatataye 🎶🏳️🌈
Its crazy though if the hadiths are pure fiction, who and why invent such a despicable character as a prophet for their new religion? Ok, it has been quite a successful religion in terms of amount of followers but how could that have been predicted?
That's because he's despicable judging by the biblical standards. Muslims do not find such a man despicable. Yasir Qahdi said "...we don't lie for the truth, our prophet did this but yet he's the truth"
Yeah, the "principle of embarrassment" would suggest that if you were going to just make things up, then you wouldn't invent one of the most repugnant and evil people who have perhaps ever existed in history - when gauged by the metric of "long term negative impact on the world" I don't think you can actually point to a *worse* (apparent) figure throughout recorded human history - and you definitely wouldn't make that fictional person who was just the worst, you wouldn't make him "the enduring pattern of moral conduct we should all strive to emulate, forever".
I get why Jay subscribes to the "Muhammad was purely a myth" position - it's pretty obvious that if he was real at all, then most of the specific details about his life as presented within his biographies are lies, or were real events moved in time/space to fit the fake narrative that Mecca was the cradle of civilization (when it has basically no history at all because of course it doesn't, it's in the middle of an enormous desert and doesn't have water), and there's a howling void of credible "proof" - but the fact that he's so, so terrible of a person - to the point where "learning what Islam actually teaches about his character" is by far and away the main "thing that makes Muslims doubt their faith" today (thanks ever so much for helpfully conducting that poll, Mohammad Hijab!) - just makes it hard to believe that he could be purely fictional.
@@matthewyoho5422 maybe it all started as a joke? Some scholars were bored and said Lets write this parody about a guy that is totally nuts and starts a religion to fit his own needs and then it took off in a totally unexpected way?