Yes Kallis the best complete cricketer. Look at era he played in. Who he took his wickets against, who he faced when batting! Warne, Waqar Younis, Wasim Akram, Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Murali,Lara, Tendulkar, Ponting, Gilchrist, Sehwag, Dravid, Hayden, Steve Waugh, Mark Waugh
The order is ridiculous. The top six without a doubt have got to be Sobers, Kallis, Botham, Kapil, Imran and Hadlee. They are the greatest ever allrounders. Way after them come the others. Flintoff before Kapil and Jadeja before Hadlee has got to be a joke. In fact Jadeja shouldn’t even be on the list.
@@thylacine1004 Botham could’ve played just as a batsman. Barring Sobers, he was the closest to a complete Allrounder. He did everything and did it really well.
@@ARSportsHub25 so that's the criteria ? Does Greg have performances with both bat and ball listed in Wisden 100 ? The only memorable thing associated with Greg is his "growel" remark.
The impact of Tony Greig in space of only five years is outstanding.He did not play for decade or 15 years or 20 years.He thoroughly deserve his place.If he would have not gone for Kerry Packer he would have broken records.
Sobers was really a batsman who could bowl a bit. He would never had been in a team as a bowler. As his bowling average and strike rate proves. Jacque Kallis should be number one. Ian Botham a genuine all rounder, who won test matches with bat and ball. Kapel Dev should certainly not be ahead. Bradman only played in Australia and England. I wonder what his batting average would have been, if he had played on the sub continent. Or West Indies and South Africa.
The Class of Kapil was very very high. In full form he was as good batsman as Sir Viv. And he was a regular wicket taker in every innings atlest 10 years.
What criteria are you using? Personal preference? Botham scored more runs and took more wickets than Imran Khan but is ranked lower? Same with Kapil Dev, scored more runs than both of them and took more wickets.
There all there, kapil should be higher than 9 It's always hard to pick the complete right rankings Sobers definitely 1 Shakibs record is impressive batting at ave 39 and bowling 31
There are two types of all-rounders, batting all-rounders and bowling all-rounders. People mostly follow those bowling all-rounders whose bowling figures are world class and their batting average is equal to an average batsman. So separate the two categories and don't mixed them.
Which is what I have said all along. He is an all-time great quick, not an all-time great all-rounder. Of those four, he was clearly the best bowler and clearly the worst batsman. Imran was the the standout allrounder, Botham had some great moments and Kapil was bloody good but not really in that class.
Is it me or what. Jacques stats are better then sobers why is he nit no 1. Also i feel kapil dev should be no 3 with 400 plus wickets and 8 centuries. Man i think this list is more personal preference then stats
While it cannot be denied how great of a batsman Sobers was, his bowling average is higher than all the other players and his bowling strike rate is astronomically high. Food for thought.
You obviously never saw sobers field. Legends of cricket named bradman above sobers as the best cricketer ever. But if you actually watch what was said about bradman and sobers the obvious winner was sobers.
Statistics are prime factor but which wickets they were taking and what impact they were making in the victory of their teams or stall the defeat is more importantThis way Botham Imran khan,Kapildev are ahead of others.
In terms of the top 3 there is no argument - Harvey should move up a notch, with Pollock in at 5. Brian Macmillan has better statistics than 50% of the guys on this list. Batting average 39.35 bowling average 33.82
I struggle to figure out how you rank these players. Pollock with a batting ave of 32.31 and a bowling ave of 23.11 is only ranked 14th compared to a number of other players with worse batting and/or bowling averages. Makes no sense
Shaun pollack is top 5 definitely. If he had concentrated on his batting earlier in his career he would be giving kalis and sobers a run for their money.
@@vuzzler1 no not even close. but still a great allrounder. being a pro im sure he did try to have better batting but that is why true allrounders are so rare . you concentrate on one more that the other, one always suffers
@@robindonnell816 the test of an all rounder is would he have been selected on one discipline only? With the other discipline as a bonus - eg. Kallis and Sobers ( they have test batting averages in the top 20 OF ALL TIME) batsmen with their bowling a bonus) bowling a bonus which makes them batting all rounders vs bowling all-rounders, Hadlee, Khan and Pollock, who has bowling averages comparing well with the great test bowlers selected on that discipline mainly. Players like Dev, Macmillan and the others have average statistics on both counts
King Kallis figures are so much more dominant than Sobers : just as an allrounder Kallis was just a much better player - he even bowled at 148.8 kph - lol Nobody in the entire era of Sobers was that quick or even close - 45 centuries…..
@@manusduminy9845 mike Procter was great : but didn’t have much chance to show it over 15 yrs I test cricket. Procter would have been a better bowler - Kallis much better batter. 45 x 100’s plus runout for 99 vs Australia. The other guys you mention aren’t even thought of at that level of all rounders .
Never has been and most probably won't ever be another all rounder like Kallis, this is the only list I have ever seen that doesn't rank Kallis #1. Most arguements are between Kallis and Flintoff for best pure all rounder, but you only rank Flintoff at 10...
Crains and Ben stokes were also not the main lead bowlers of their team at any point of time.. and neither have won matches solely on their bowling abiliity for their team in test cricket.. same holds for Sobers and kallis.. Tony greig doesn't qualify for the list. The top 6 shud be very very close competition.. I am not rating them in serial order.. but randomly it shud be Imran Khan, Ian Botham, Keith Miller, Kapil Dev, Richard Hadlee, Shaun Pollock.. followed by Gary Sobers, Andrew flintoff, vinoo mankad and jack kallis.
It seems like it's just stats tha matter to the person commenting on Sobers. Garfield Sobers made the West Indies team as a 17yr old leg spinner who evolved into a fast or medium fast bowler who took the new ball &bowled multiple types of deliveries including the difficult to bowl Googly&was in the habit of removing very troublesome batsmen ,I believe his batting developed at a faster pace than his bowlingso he became what is now defined as a batting alrounder still he took over 200 wickets in Test cricket. To know how Great he was ask Australian Greats the Chapell Bros, Doug Walter's, Richie Benaud &The one considered the World's Greatest batsman Don Bradman
You ever think that what he used as a spins bowler that is his calling to test cricket, end up being a fast bowler depends on the nature of the game that means that he was over work at times, he Sobers is the best leg slips fielder ever to played the game in a class by herself Tony Lock of England may be next to him batting and bowling is not all to cricket
Shaun pollock better than jajeda,cairns,flintoff,stokes,shakib,becosz of being a opining bowler and his stats just better, i feel for mcmillan ,vettori,ashwin,waugh brothers
Fabulous player but no, IMO Sobers is supreme. Slightly better bat, 3 different types of bowling, both fabulous in the field. Good to see the great Keith Miller so high on the list
@@BigAmp Evening Mark, look at the stats, Kallis is far ahead. Kallis more runs and wickets and catches, but Sobers average was better in catching and batting
Yes Kallis. Look at era he played in. Warne, Waqar Younis, Wasim Akram, Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Murali,Lara, Tendulkar, Ponting, Gilchrist, Sehwag, Dravid, Hayden, Steve Waugh, Mark Waugh.
Generally, an all-rounder is considered to be one who is world class in one field and not below the average category in another field. So a batting all-rounder should have three wickets plus per Test match and a bowling average of around 29 to 30 which is that of an average bowler. And a bowling all-rounder should have a batting average of around 32 to 35 which is that of an average batsman.
J kallis should’ve been top and not sure why cairns and shakib are in the top 15 maybe klusener and abdul Razzaq should also be included but I suppose we all our opinions
all rounded ka arth wo khiladi jo bating aur boling ka perfact ho itna ki agar run na bane to 1aham boler ho na ki partime aur agar boling me na chale to bhi aham batsmen ho jaise saqib al hasan aur lance kulujnar partime boler all rounder nahi hota
Absolutely Ridiculous and Rubbish Grading of Allrounders.Kapil Dev has been numbered at 9 behind Tony Greig,Chris Cairns,Ben Stockes.Considering all the aspects of the game like condition,situation he must have been placed after Sir Garry.
Gary Sobers Imran Khan Ian Botham Kapel Dev the most entertaining allrounders Kallis the most boring allrounder of the lot I would have Viv Richards ahead of Kallis. Viv was an entertainer
I cannot under stand what criteria you have used to rank these guys, as your list is completely wrong! Also, you have some glaring omissions. West Indians: Collis King, Malcolm Marshall, Leary Constantine. Australians; Richie Banaud, Steve Waugh. Indians; Ravichandran Ashwin. Pakistanis; Asif Iqbal, Wasim Akram. England's; Wilfred Rhodes, Basil D'Oliveira, WG Grace.
On What Count! He has a strike rate lower than IK in bowling, Captaincy records way Superior to Kapil, more away wins as Captain abroad, and more series wins abroad, way way better Bowling average than Kapil despite Khan being crap last couple of years.....Not much batting average difference,
What about Frank Woolley? He scored 145 centuries, and took more than 2000 wickets with a bowling average of less than 20 per wicket, in all First Class cricket. It does not get better than this!
First of if one is not capable of being selected in the only on the basis of his bowling he is not an all rounder at all. Gary sobers and jack kallis cannot be chosen in their teams only for bowling hence they were not all rounders they were just great batsmen and support bowlers.
Are troll or just not smart. Gary sobers was one of the best fielders of his generation. He opened the bowling for the West Indies and he was the best batsman of his generation why would he not be considered an Allrounder
on given day kapil was better all rounder than imran. it seems there is a sense of prejudice against kapil dev because i dont see the legent in top 20 fast bowlers or top five all rounder considering he is the only test player till date to score 4000 plus runs and take 400 plus wickets.
You are absolutely correct.I have also observed that there is a continuous effort to malign the all time 2nd best allrounders of the game after Sir Garry.There is virtually no doubt about it.
Imran was a better batsman than Kapil and a much better bowler. Kapil played for a long time and stayed injury free, but was at best a workhorse / stock bowler. Imran was a killer, and was the best bowler in the world for a large part of the 80's, in addition to being a very good batsman mostly in the latter half of the 80's.
Don't count the quantity and you should count only quality. Just like Bumrah whose bowling average better than Kapil dev but number of wickets much lesser. And I consider Bumrah is the best bowler of Indian Cricket history. I hope you got my point dear brother.
Hahaha!!! Funny list! Only guy in the history of cricket with 5000+ runs and 400+ wickets is the incomparable Kapil Dev. World Cup winning captain. Hasn’t missed a single game due to fitness. The correct list: Sobers/Kallis Kapil/Imran/Botham/Hadlee All the others
Heavily weighted in favour of batters who could bowl rather than bowlers who could bat... Order should be: 1. Khan Miller Sobers Kallis Hadley Hard to compare the two types of allrounders, Hadley the best of these as a bowler whilst Kallis the best with the bat but Khan would have made the side on the strength of solely his batting and his bowling makes him the best. Likewise Miller hence why second. The rest were either selected for their batting or bowling but more than useful with the other. Sobers is a hard one, easily the most accomplished sportsman ever in Cricket, could do it all. Hos bowling average at 34 means however he would have been less likely picked just for his bowling.
Not a great list. Ashwin is better all-rounder than many on this list, batting average of 27+ with 5 centuries and 23+ bowling average with almost 500 wickets.
Would Sobers or Kallis get a game for their bowling alone? That's a resounding no. The great 4 genuine all rounders are Botham, Khan, Dev and Hadlee. All 4 could have played for their country with bat or ball.
kallis bowled at 140 early on he chose to focus on his batting besides none of the above has his runs wickets and catches simply put a perfect All round cricketer if you can show me a better all round record than kallis I'll agree batting average of Tendulkar bowling average of zaahir ad those sublime slip cordon catches those countless nicks off the bowling from the likes of Donald Pollock Ntini Steyn Morkel to mention a few He could open the bowling for many countries in South Africa it would always be hard as there are Pacers aplenty I do respect that list greatly but Kallis is miles ahead of tge
Good morning this is not the first time l am watching this but l must reply to Robert Cameron . Garfield Sobers came into West Indies team as a spinner but his batting grew rapidly.
Yes Kallis the best complete cricketer. Look at era he played in. Who he took his wickets against, who he faced when batting!
Warne, Waqar Younis, Wasim Akram, Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Murali,Lara, Tendulkar, Ponting, Gilchrist, Sehwag, Dravid, Hayden, Steve Waugh, Mark Waugh
And to add to that he took 200 catches in the field in test cricket.
As a Barbadian 🇧🇧 just like Sir Garfield Sobers
I feel very proud of our
National Hero and cricket 🏏 champion.
❤🇧🇧
Ridifuckinculous to put Shaun Pollock and Richard Hadlee so far down and Ben Stokes, Chris Cairns, Ravindra Jadeja ahead of them!
Pollock has better stats than Kapil Dev
Sobers and Kallis in class of their own
1:34 Shakib 6052 Wickets?
The quality of ranking logic of this channel is as same as the quality of attention to detail
The order is ridiculous. The top six without a doubt have got to be Sobers, Kallis, Botham, Kapil, Imran and Hadlee. They are the greatest ever allrounders. Way after them come the others. Flintoff before Kapil and Jadeja before Hadlee has got to be a joke. In fact Jadeja shouldn’t even be on the list.
Botham was the closet to a 50/50 all rounder in his peak.....He could open the bowling or batting at his peak....
@@thylacine1004
Botham could’ve played just as a batsman. Barring Sobers, he was the closest to a complete Allrounder. He did everything and did it really well.
Mike Proctor was far better than anyone on this list except Sobers
Great list, sobers easily number 1, shakib from bangledesh record is brilliant should be higher
Kapil Dev is better All-Rounder than Chris Cairns,Ben Stokes,Ian Botham. Why you put Kapil Dev lesser than these 3 Players?
Worse, how's Tony Greig a better A/R than KD ?????
@@AnkitSingh-xl6pt Tony greig bat avg 40+ and bowl avg 32+
@@ARSportsHub25 so that's the criteria ? Does Greg have performances with both bat and ball listed in Wisden 100 ? The only memorable thing associated with Greg is his "growel" remark.
The impact of Tony Greig in space of only five years is outstanding.He did not play for decade or 15 years or 20 years.He thoroughly deserve his place.If he would have not gone for Kerry Packer he would have
broken records.
Sobers was really a batsman who could bowl a bit. He would never had been in a team as a bowler. As his bowling average and strike rate proves. Jacque Kallis should be number one. Ian Botham a genuine all rounder, who won test matches with bat and ball. Kapel Dev should certainly not be ahead. Bradman only played in Australia and England. I wonder what his batting average would have been, if he had played on the sub continent. Or West Indies and South Africa.
1.jack quallis
2.gary sobers
3.Ian botham
4.Kapil dev
5.Imran khan
6.Richard hadlee
Kapil is the only equi-potential allrounder with both bat n ball with more than 5000 test runs & more than 400 wickets, which would be unbreakable
The Class of Kapil was very very high.
In full form he was as good batsman as Sir Viv.
And he was a regular wicket taker in every innings atlest 10 years.
Shakib has more than 6052 wickets. He is the greatest ever
What criteria are you using? Personal preference? Botham scored more runs and took more wickets than Imran Khan but is ranked lower? Same with Kapil Dev, scored more runs than both of them and took more wickets.
There all there, kapil should be higher than 9
It's always hard to pick the complete right rankings
Sobers definitely 1
Shakibs record is impressive batting at ave 39 and bowling 31
There are two types of all-rounders, batting all-rounders and bowling all-rounders. People mostly follow those bowling all-rounders whose bowling figures are world class and their batting average is equal to an average batsman. So separate the two categories and don't mixed them.
You have left out Wilfred Rhodes, who has batted at all slots,shared century stands for 1st and last wkts in a 30 yr career
No doubt about that.
Peak ICC ratings of these players:
Sobers - 669
Botham - 646
Kallis - 616
Miller - 573
Imran - 518
Greig - 509
Flintoff - 501
Cairns - 500
Stokes - 497
Pollock - 490
Shakib - 489
Hadlee - 483
Jadeja - 460
Kapil - 433
Mankad - 417
How is Chris Cairns a greater allrounder than Richard Hadlee?
Hadlee a far superior cricketer but his batting wasn't really up to much.
@@tonylove4800 good enough to score a test century, but not up to the level of his competitors. An all time great bowler though.
Which is what I have said all along. He is an all-time great quick, not an all-time great all-rounder. Of those four, he was clearly the best bowler and clearly the worst batsman. Imran was the the standout allrounder, Botham had some great moments and Kapil was bloody good but not really in that class.
@@tonylove4800
Hadlee better than Cairns
@@dhaanushl6465 By a factor of a million. I would never deny that. Read what I said.
shakib ul hason wicket wrong u mistakes
Kallis no 1 always
Is it me or what. Jacques stats are better then sobers why is he nit no 1. Also i feel kapil dev should be no 3 with 400 plus wickets and 8 centuries. Man i think this list is more personal preference then stats
While it cannot be denied how great of a batsman Sobers was, his bowling average is higher than all the other players and his bowling strike rate is astronomically high. Food for thought.
Sobers and kallis are great batsmen and good support bowlers , they are not all rounders at all.
@@rasheedrehman4694 You are deluded.
You obviously never saw sobers field. Legends of cricket named bradman above sobers as the best cricketer ever. But if you actually watch what was said about bradman and sobers the obvious winner was sobers.
I can see the argument for sobers being a batting-allrounder, but kallis is definitely a genuine all-rounder
@@vuzzler1
Comparing Bradman and Sobers is absurd and not what this discussion thread is about.
shakib shows 6000 wickets ???? Insane
As unrealised contenders you'd be hard going past Shaun Pollock's uncles
Richie Benaud should be here
How did you know that no one has taken 6052 wickets in the history of cricket? Shakib Al Hasan took 6052 wickets
Statistics are prime factor but which wickets they were taking and what impact they were making in the victory of their teams or stall the defeat is more importantThis way Botham Imran khan,Kapildev are ahead of others.
In terms of the top 3 there is no argument - Harvey should move up a notch, with Pollock in at 5. Brian Macmillan has better statistics than 50% of the guys on this list. Batting average 39.35 bowling average 33.82
Imran at 3 is ridiculous. Kapil n Botham are better
Alan Davidson, Richie Benaud?Denis Compton?Steve and Mark Waugh?
Kallis should be at 1
I struggle to figure out how you rank these players. Pollock with a batting ave of 32.31 and a bowling ave of 23.11 is only ranked 14th compared to a number of other players with worse batting and/or bowling averages. Makes no sense
Specially Ravindra jadeja who has laughable stats in comparison to pollock is much higher in rank
Shaun pollack is top 5 definitely. If he had concentrated on his batting earlier in his career he would be giving kalis and sobers a run for their money.
@@vuzzler1 no not even close. but still a great allrounder. being a pro im sure he did try to have better batting but that is why true allrounders are so rare . you concentrate on one more that the other, one always suffers
@@robindonnell816 the test of an all rounder is would he have been selected on one discipline only? With the other discipline as a bonus - eg. Kallis and Sobers ( they have test batting averages in the top 20 OF ALL TIME) batsmen with their bowling a bonus) bowling a bonus which makes them batting all rounders vs bowling all-rounders, Hadlee, Khan and Pollock, who has bowling averages comparing well with the great test bowlers selected on that discipline mainly. Players like Dev, Macmillan and the others have average statistics on both counts
@@battievandermerwe9121 and your telling me this why?
King Kallis figures are so much more dominant than Sobers : just as an allrounder Kallis was just a much better player - he even bowled at 148.8 kph - lol
Nobody in the entire era of Sobers was that quick or even close - 45 centuries…..
O, really? What about Wes Hall? Dave Renneburg? Garth Mackenzie? Mike Proctor?
@@manusduminy9845 mike Procter was great : but didn’t have much chance to show it over 15 yrs I test cricket. Procter would have been a better bowler - Kallis much better batter. 45 x 100’s plus runout for 99 vs Australia. The other guys you mention aren’t even thought of at that level of all rounders .
Yeah he probably was a better bowler but sobers was a way better fielder than he was
Yeah he probably was a better bowler but sobers was a way better fielder than he was
@@vuzzler1 Kallis took 199 catches from what I can recall
Never has been and most probably won't ever be another all rounder like Kallis, this is the only list I have ever seen that doesn't rank Kallis #1.
Most arguements are between Kallis and Flintoff for best pure all rounder, but you only rank Flintoff at 10...
Crains and Ben stokes were also not the main lead bowlers of their team at any point of time.. and neither have won matches solely on their bowling abiliity for their team in test cricket.. same holds for Sobers and kallis.. Tony greig doesn't qualify for the list. The top 6 shud be very very close competition.. I am not rating them in serial order.. but randomly it shud be Imran Khan, Ian Botham, Keith Miller, Kapil Dev, Richard Hadlee, Shaun Pollock.. followed by Gary Sobers, Andrew flintoff, vinoo mankad and jack kallis.
It seems like it's just stats tha matter to the person commenting on Sobers. Garfield Sobers made the West Indies team as a 17yr old leg spinner who evolved into a fast or medium fast bowler who took the new ball &bowled multiple types of deliveries including the difficult to bowl Googly&was in the habit of removing very troublesome batsmen ,I believe his batting developed at a faster pace than his bowlingso he became what is now defined as a batting alrounder still he took over 200 wickets in Test cricket. To know how Great he was ask Australian Greats the Chapell Bros, Doug Walter's, Richie Benaud &The one considered the World's Greatest batsman Don Bradman
Not accepted.... Kapil Dev at number 11.... Very biased study....
Shakib Bhai got 6052 wickets?
You ever think that what he used as a spins bowler that is his calling to test cricket, end up being a fast bowler depends on the nature of the game that means that he was over work at times, he Sobers is the best leg slips fielder ever to played the game in a class by herself Tony Lock of England may be next to him batting and bowling is not all to cricket
Shaun pollock better than jajeda,cairns,flintoff,stokes,shakib,becosz of being a opining bowler and his stats just better, i feel for mcmillan ,vettori,ashwin,waugh brothers
Surely Kallis is by far the best
No doubt...
Fabulous player but no, IMO Sobers is supreme. Slightly better bat, 3 different types of bowling, both fabulous in the field. Good to see the great Keith Miller so high on the list
@@BigAmp Evening Mark, look at the stats, Kallis is far ahead. Kallis more runs and wickets and catches, but Sobers average was better in catching and batting
Yes Kallis. Look at era he played in. Warne, Waqar Younis, Wasim Akram, Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, Murali,Lara, Tendulkar, Ponting, Gilchrist, Sehwag, Dravid, Hayden, Steve Waugh, Mark Waugh.
Why haven't I heard of the Bangladeshi with 6,052 wickets?
How many catches did Sobers take in comparison to Kallis.
Are speaking about allrounders for both Hall and Griffth were surely quicker
Where is aswin he a world class spinner and class test batsman. Why you ignored the Power ful player அஸ்வின்.
Only Keith Miller and Imran khan have stats as true allrounder can be play either as a batsman or bowler.
I guess kallis played golf 😒
@@shaheempashua6924 kallis was mainly batsman he can not come in team as a pure bowler
Kallis was a mediocre bowler. Imran was as good a bowler as Kallis was a batsman, and a much better batsman than Kallis was as a bowler.
Generally, an all-rounder is considered to be one who is world class in one field and not below the average category in another field. So a batting all-rounder should have three wickets plus per Test match and a bowling average of around 29 to 30 which is that of an average bowler. And a bowling all-rounder should have a batting average of around 32 to 35 which is that of an average batsman.
Vettori
J kallis should’ve been top and not sure why cairns and shakib are in the top 15 maybe klusener and abdul Razzaq should also be included but I suppose we all our opinions
Miller behind Botham is a complete joke. And Kapil is too high.
Check your data, it has lots of error.. Batting Avg of Ravindra Jadeja is more then 35 not 25.. and also look the number of wickets of sakib..
Kallis
Kapil sir 9th ha ....no no
Dan Vettorie scored 4500 test runs and took 362 test wickets. And not on this list. Go figure.
रिचर्ड हेडली से आगे जडेजा ये कौन angle se सही है
Dude took over 6000 wickets lol
Are you joking mate? U kept Shakib at no 13 and Flintoff, stokes Jadeja are ahead of him 🤣🤣LoL
It seems to me the English players were the best although they loose so much
Where's Pollock,
Perfect all-rounder is Imran Khan
This list is wrong Hadlee should be 4th.
It seems that wicket keepers do not qualify as an all rounder. I dont see names like Boucher, Gillchrest, Dhoni etc. In your list😢
all rounded ka arth wo khiladi jo bating aur boling ka perfact ho itna ki agar run na bane to 1aham boler ho na ki partime aur agar boling me na chale to bhi aham batsmen ho jaise saqib al hasan aur lance kulujnar partime boler all rounder nahi hota
Where's Shane Pollock, Ravindra Jadeja Not to suitable to No12,
Sir Richard Hadlee should more better than given Place,
Imran is Perfect Alrounder
Absolutely Ridiculous and Rubbish Grading of Allrounders.Kapil Dev has been numbered at 9 behind Tony Greig,Chris Cairns,Ben Stockes.Considering all the aspects of the game like condition,situation he must have been placed after Sir Garry.
Gary Sobers Imran Khan Ian Botham Kapel Dev the most entertaining allrounders Kallis the most boring allrounder of the lot I would have Viv Richards ahead of Kallis. Viv was an entertainer
Shakib's wickets😅
I cannot under stand what criteria you have used to rank these guys, as your list is completely wrong! Also, you have some glaring omissions. West Indians: Collis King, Malcolm Marshall, Leary Constantine. Australians; Richie Banaud, Steve Waugh. Indians; Ravichandran Ashwin. Pakistanis; Asif Iqbal, Wasim Akram. England's; Wilfred Rhodes, Basil D'Oliveira, WG Grace.
What happen to west indies jason holder ..the number 1 test alrounder for many years above stokes ....this can be bias
See their stats
The channel purposely makes nonsense rankings to get more comments. Chris cains ranked above Kapil for example .
Kapil Dev should be at number 3
On What Count! He has a strike rate lower than IK in bowling, Captaincy records way Superior to Kapil, more away wins as Captain abroad, and more series wins abroad, way way better Bowling average than Kapil despite Khan being crap last couple of years.....Not much batting average difference,
See what I mean them people don't rate the west indies or black people,I know for sure we have some great allrounders
Not many Australians in the list.
A true all rounder in my opinion has a higher batting average than his bowling average. So 2 of your top 15 would not be on my list
Jack kallis is d is d best alrouder
He was a d definitely
Kapil Dev should have been in the top 5. Need to workout on your listing 😂
why Ashwin not in the list?
You forgot Shahid Afridi
how did shakib take 6052 wickets?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? more like 300 odd wickets
They are including street/galli cricket wickets too.
Sakib al Hasan is GOAT all-rounder
Ye sab Indian opinion bumrah KO agarkar Srinath or zaheer khan SE behatar
Maaanta hai thoda hajam Nahi hota
What about Frank Woolley? He scored 145 centuries, and took more than 2000 wickets with a bowling average of less than 20 per wicket, in all First Class cricket. It does not get better than this!
yeah and ave 36.1 with the bat and 33.9 with the ball in tests so sorry it does get better than that
First of if one is not capable of being selected in the only on the basis of his bowling he is not an all rounder at all. Gary sobers and jack kallis cannot be chosen in their teams only for bowling hence they were not all rounders they were just great batsmen and support bowlers.
Are troll or just not smart. Gary sobers was one of the best fielders of his generation. He opened the bowling for the West Indies and he was the best batsman of his generation why would he not be considered an Allrounder
@@vuzzler1 the problem is his bowling average.
Sobers and Kallis were both great slip fieldsmen. The top allrounder could all field well. 🏏🇿🇦🇧🇧🏏
@@rasheedrehman4694 remember Sobers could bowl everything,spin,medium pace,fast. And he could field anywhere. AND wicketkeep.he be the best.🇧🇧🏏🏆
@@brucekilby9957 Let me state again Sobers made his debut as a spinner.
on given day kapil was better all rounder than imran. it seems there is a sense of prejudice against kapil dev because i dont see the legent in top 20 fast bowlers or top five all rounder considering he is the only test player till date to score 4000 plus runs and take 400 plus wickets.
You are absolutely correct.I have also observed that there is a continuous effort to malign the all time 2nd best allrounders of the game after Sir Garry.There is virtually no doubt about it.
Imran was a better batsman than Kapil and a much better bowler. Kapil played for a long time and stayed injury free, but was at best a workhorse / stock bowler. Imran was a killer, and was the best bowler in the world for a large part of the 80's, in addition to being a very good batsman mostly in the latter half of the 80's.
Don't count the quantity and you should count only quality. Just like Bumrah whose bowling average better than Kapil dev but number of wickets much lesser. And I consider Bumrah is the best bowler of Indian Cricket history. I hope you got my point dear brother.
wasim akram? i'd pick him before chris cairns.
I didn't see Ashwin
Hahaha!!! Funny list!
Only guy in the history of cricket with 5000+ runs and 400+ wickets is the incomparable Kapil Dev. World Cup winning captain. Hasn’t missed a single game due to fitness.
The correct list:
Sobers/Kallis
Kapil/Imran/Botham/Hadlee
All the others
Avarages are more important, Kapil has played 132 tests
@@manjulabandara5521 according to your logic, Kambli is better than tendulkar due to a better average?🧐
Heavily weighted in favour of batters who could bowl rather than bowlers who could bat... Order should be:
1. Khan
Miller
Sobers
Kallis
Hadley
Hard to compare the two types of allrounders, Hadley the best of these as a bowler whilst Kallis the best with the bat but Khan would have made the side on the strength of solely his batting and his bowling makes him the best. Likewise Miller hence why second. The rest were either selected for their batting or bowling but more than useful with the other. Sobers is a hard one, easily the most accomplished sportsman ever in Cricket, could do it all. Hos bowling average at 34 means however he would have been less likely picked just for his bowling.
Ashwin?
Not a great list. Ashwin is better all-rounder than many on this list, batting average of 27+ with 5 centuries and 23+ bowling average with almost 500 wickets.
Sanath Jayasuriya ?
Shahid afridi????
Would Sobers or Kallis get a game for their bowling alone? That's a resounding no. The great 4 genuine all rounders are Botham, Khan, Dev and Hadlee. All 4 could have played for their country with bat or ball.
kallis bowled at 140 early on he chose to focus on his batting
besides none of the above has his runs wickets and catches simply put a perfect All round cricketer
if you can show me a better all round record than kallis I'll agree
batting average of Tendulkar bowling average of zaahir ad those sublime slip cordon catches those countless nicks off the bowling from the likes of Donald Pollock Ntini Steyn Morkel to mention a few
He could open the bowling for many countries in South Africa it would always be hard as there are Pacers aplenty
I do respect that list greatly but Kallis is miles ahead of tge
Sobers came into the West Indies team as a spinner . Do some reading before posting inaccurate opinions.
Good morning this is not the first time l am watching this but l must reply to Robert Cameron . Garfield Sobers came into West Indies team as a spinner but his batting grew rapidly.
@@keithcampbell6806 his bowling was versatile but not as effective as some. Botham was superior and won matches and series with both bat and ball.
Imran averages 37 with the bat. That's not good enough to get into any team as a batsman. Stop with the delusion.
Numbers are lieing.
I don't agree with the order.
Number one SIR GARFIELD SOBERS OF THE WEST INDIES THAT'S IT.
I don’t know why Imran got 3rd spot his records, averages are very low than great Kapil Dev. And when Shakib got 6000 plus wickets.
Imran s avarages are far better than Kapil Dev
@@manjulabandara5521 Where in paid and fixed Sharjah and in Pak? Imran success rate overseas as a batsman is negligible. Please correct yourselves.
miller , imran , sobers , kallis , botham , shakib , jadeja , pollock , kapil , crains , headly , tony , fintoff , aswin , stokes ,
My top three are Sobers, Imran and Miller.
This is Rubish report....
I am sorry to say this is most silly analysis I have ever watched, watching these type of analysis is definitely waste of time
Add
Wasim Akram, Mahindra Amarnath and Sanat Jaisurya instead of
Chris Cayerns,Rabindranath Jadeja and Shaun Poolock.
Otherwise a comprehensive list