Timothy Williamson | The Role of Philosophy

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 27. 07. 2024
  • Philosopher Timothy Williamson explains our instruments of understanding, the value of analytic philosophy, and why we debate.
    Subscribe to the Institute of Art and Ideas / iaitv
    Timothy Williamson is Wykeham Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford and a world renowned philosopher of language and logic. He has written extensively on what philosophy is, and how it should be done.
    #philosophy #metaphilosophy #logic

Komentáře • 14

  • @alexanderalexander9575
    @alexanderalexander9575 Před 4 lety +3

    “I can’t say that when I’m solving personal problems I list some premises and then deduce the conclusion of what I should do” -T. Williamson. That touched me to the core.

  • @phil7
    @phil7 Před 4 lety +18

    One of the most brilliant philosophers of our time.

  • @GrowthMindsetProductions
    @GrowthMindsetProductions Před 4 lety +2

    This is one of my greatest impacts from studying stoicism: *Do* *what* *makes* *you* *happy* - *Life* *is* *too* *short* *to* *not* *enjoy* *it* =)

  • @behrad9712
    @behrad9712 Před 4 lety +1

    He's a great thinker...!, we need these minds to solve our problems...

  • @kito-
    @kito- Před 2 lety

    What a legend

  • @shebamazing
    @shebamazing Před 3 lety +2

    BRILLIANT!

  • @robineur
    @robineur Před 4 lety +4

    The poor audio quality seriously undermined the somewhat choppy presentation in this video. Thorough preparation of all technical equipment is needed if one wishes to present a credible presentation - especially when offering serious content such as in this video.

  • @VladyslavKL
    @VladyslavKL Před 3 lety

    🐬

  • @Federico1685
    @Federico1685 Před 9 měsíci

    Everything was going well until the interviewer asked the dumbest question possible, suggesing that debate could eventually drive away women and members of minoriy ethnicities from philosophy. I felt the cringe in Williamson's face.

  • @mouwersor
    @mouwersor Před 2 lety

    YOUR BOOK SUCKS
    If we shouldn't have taken the 'linguistic/conceptual turn' because language 'refers to the world', what does this 'referring' mean precisely? You have missed the entire field of reasons why people 'took that turn' and I wasted money on it.

    • @Dere2727
      @Dere2727 Před měsícem

      He spends multiple chapters going over the reasons for it and saying why they were mistaken