By writing over the tab of paper as it draws the false bottom line, the pen is lifted up the thickness of the inserted paper (it's higher than when it started)
What about making the square at the Edge of the paper and draw the false bottom line on the table, that way It would be lowered instead, which is allowed
@@antoniojimenezperez50 Yes. That works for drawing a line from the paper to the table. But at the other end of the line you need to lift the pen back up f it's still a good bar bet the way he did it.Yes. That works for drawing a line from the paper to the table. But at the other end of the line you need to lift the pen back up from the table onto the paper to finish. The edge of the paper is always going to be a discontinuity of some kind. But if your friends aren't too rigorous, it's still a good bar bet the way he did it :-)
It doesn't work. There can on be two vertices with an odd number of lines meeting: the starting and the end point. However, a box with an x inside has four such vertices, which means, that it is impossible to draw in a single line. However, you can draw an envelop (or house with a cross), as the extra lines turn two corners into vertices with four lines.
Nope - that does not count. One instinctively gets the feel that this is cheating. Other commenters point out (correctly) that the pen is lifted by the fold of the paper, which is correct.
By writing over the tab of paper as it draws the false bottom line, the pen is lifted up the thickness of the inserted paper (it's higher than when it started)
"Without losing contact with paper/surface" would be more correct. Also, no surface is perfectly flat, always going to be tiny vertical fluctuations
What about making the square at the Edge of the paper and draw the false bottom line on the table, that way It would be lowered instead, which is allowed
@@antoniojimenezperez50 Yes. That works for drawing a line from the paper to the table. But at the other end of the line you need to lift the pen back up f it's still a good bar bet the way he did it.Yes. That works for drawing a line from the paper to the table. But at the other end of the line you need to lift the pen back up from the table onto the paper to finish. The edge of the paper is always going to be a discontinuity of some kind. But if your friends aren't too rigorous, it's still a good bar bet the way he did it :-)
😂 my hypotesis is flawed 😭
IT CAN BE DONE WITHOUT CHEATING. THE X CAN BE MADE WITH 3 OR FOUR LINES
if you're gonna do it that way, might as well draw the same line twice (overlap)
This is definitly cheating.
kinda cool, but you cheated ,this ain't a magic show!
It doesn't work. There can on be two vertices with an odd number of lines meeting: the starting and the end point. However, a box with an x inside has four such vertices, which means, that it is impossible to draw in a single line. However, you can draw an envelop (or house with a cross), as the extra lines turn two corners into vertices with four lines.
You still lifted the pen off the paper, you just used another piece of paper to do it.
as for me, it counts as lifting
Yeah. He definitely lifted the pen off the paper onto another paper. Even if it was only micrometers, it was still a lift.
That wasn't even worth a thumbs down.
😂😂😂😂😂
He seems to be a fool...
ok, cheat, cool.
Lol
Nope - that does not count. One instinctively gets the feel that this is cheating. Other commenters point out (correctly) that the pen is lifted by the fold of the paper, which is correct.