Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
The Real Culprit of an Ancient Egyptian Plague Was... Bread?
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 08. 2024
- According to the Bible, the 10th plague to befall Ancient Egypt killed the first born child of every family. Now, new scientific evidence suggests that this may have actually occurred - and that a fungal infection was responsible.
From the Series: Secrets
bit.ly/2qZaXHP
this is so sad... it is ironic that the first born dies because the parents tried to feed their precious child
Nigel SG 2017 God killed those. Not bread. That's absurd.
God works in mysterious ways. Why not use the fungus in the bread?
Nigel SG 2017 LINK
Chris Hall The irony. A mystical space being killing people without cause is much more absurd than fungi. LMAO.
Jack Gibbons he did have a cause I'm not giving my opinion if it was a good cause or not but there was a cause so yeah you are wrong.
*looks suspiciously at peanut butter and jelly sandwich*
😂😂😂😂
Number 15 egyptian wheat lettuce
Interesting how all the plagues in the Bible correspond to the Egyptian gods.
I believe ergot was also found in Massachusetts before, during, and after the Salem witch trials. It is a hallucinogenic which could have made those in the town of Salem at the time to take on effects of LSD poisoning as this grain was used in most food. There is a large theory that this could have been the cause of the trials.
That's my theory.
It's strange that archeologists that prize manuscripts and are always looking for missing pieces of the puzzle dismiss manuscripts that recount these events.... instead they call them folktales of people trying to make sense of something that they are sure must have been blown out of proportion?
Because then they’d have to admit God exists and therefor right and wrong exist outside of their own personal feelings
@@jonathanwilliams1065 Exactly
When something good happens, praise a god. When something bad happens, blame mankind. The ideal conditions for the creation of a religion.
I'm sorry I didn't know it was God that makes Wars I didn't realize it was God who tries to Influence People in murdering and stealing humans are evil that's just a fact no man is innocent
John Porter Uhuh, if it weren't for religion, some wars in history wouldn't have happened. And you damn hell know that God has commanded some sick things, if you read the Bible.
Nicki Minaj Our Lord And Saviour sir/ ma’am, religion is not what causes wars. It’s greed, even the crusades weren’t really about religion, they were about fucking up the Middle East and stealing their shit
The real culprit for the 10 Plagues on Egypt was Ramses because God had to punish him for refusing to let His chosen people go.
I’m not religious, so your little stories mean nothing to me, but did it ever occur to you that maybe God used the fungus to punish them?
Ergot? isn't that where LSD was first derived from. Would eating the fungus make you hallucinate like LSD?
Brendon Tompa-Clinch -yes it could. I have read historic reports of a fungal infected wheat and barley crop in the 18-19th century US colonies. people got sick and had symptoms like fever, hallucinations, vomiting and sometimes seizures that were unexplained. it was thought to be people were possessed by a demon, or a witch. no one understood it was their crops that was infecting them. a lot of people died from eating contaminated grains from too much rain and warm air that harvest season that contributed to the mold growth.
Syrena Webb huh. Neat.
Brendon Tompa-Clinch except a trip on ergot has been compared with being burned alive with out dying. Definitely not the same as it's cousin LSD
Feelthefx Oh shit. sounds baf
Ergot was the catalyst for the Salem Witch Trials, so I'd generally think that it would be a fucking bad trip
The real culprit was the Egyptians disobeying god
I'm not saying this theory is true, but I want to add some input into their theory. The grain harvest taking place in the 1st month during this time would have been the barley harvest. The Israelites were NOT allowed to eat NEW grain until the feast of firs fruits on the 16th day of this month. The death of the 1st born took place on the night of the 14th. So if the barley did have a deathly mold/fungus on it, the Israelites would not have touched it, because the 16th hadn't arrived yet. However the Egyptians, who do not follow the laws of the God of the bible, would have been eating the barley that day. Maybe this fungus weakened their immune systems, but this fungus was NOT the reason the 1st born died. Remember, even the firstborn animals died. Do you honestly think during a food shortage, that Egyptians were feeding all the firstborn animals GRAIN? Of course not, that is just absurd. Most of these animals wouldn't be eating grain even if there was no food shortage, so fungus cannot explain their deaths.
What we do know however, is that the Exodus plagues were almost guaranteed to have been caused by God aligning the famous Santorini volcano eruption with the Exodus. Science has proven that a volcano eruption this size can easily explain the first 9 plagues. And with some extra knowledge make sense of the 10th plague of death to the 1st born.
They claim the volcano eruption would create carbon gas that would float like a cloud along the ground, usually no higher than 18 inches off the ground as it travels and as the wind takes it until it eventually disperses into the atmosphere. The Israelites were not only instructed to wipe lambs blood on their door posts, but they were told to have their doors SHUT and they were commanded to STAY AWAKE all night long. Being awake meant being OFF THE GROUND, for during this time period both Egyptians and Israelites had their beds on the ground. I cant remember where I read this, but historians say that because 1st born Egyptian males were of the highest regard, they by tradition always slept on the ground near the entrance to the house. If this is true, it would explain how they died, most likely from suffocation do to carbon monoxide poisoning caused by the volcano. A video made by the history channel claims that the first born males slept on the floor inside the house, while any other children traditionally slept on the roof or in wagons as accouple of examples, and that adults slept in beds somewhat off the ground. This meant that the 1st born male would have been the only person in the household low enough to the ground while the carbon monoxide cloud swept through the cities no higher than 18 inches off the ground (according to recent volcanic gas observations).
While some or all of this may be wrong, the purpose was to add to the speculation. And I believe the answer I provided makes more sence when you properly understand the volcano that had just taken place in history.
Good points.
2:05. Scared the shit out of me...
Livin' Rob 😂😂😂😂😂
Ikr. What is that
Stopppppp!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭
those Egyptians look real suspect to me
ϥⲣⲁⲟⲛ they look like german tourists lol
The ten plagues were not natural and were not tall tales
Some of the plagues were natural, particularly plagues which were consequences of other plagues
However this was supernatural, and the Bible clearly says that it was an Angel that killed Egypt’s firstborn
Old men stoned on hashish gazing up at the stars , telling stories round a fire, attempting to make sense of what their ancient grandfather had once mumbled about one night...
I assure you, bread didn't kill 100% of the firstborn Man AND Beast, and ignore a million people in 1 little area off to the side.
😒 and all the first born in Egypt somehow altogether magically died in the same night ?
Liew Yan Lin Along with the firstborn Animals too
And the 1 million on Goshen were untouched.
Liew Yan Lin why are they always trying to dispute god..read your bible...senseless events??? no ...sorry for these ppl when Jesus comes....
we won't have to deal with these atheist idiots for much longer wait one year
take your pills all week knowing full well science is our best bet to explain our place in the universe. then debate it all day Friday Saturday or Sunday. please stop taking medicine and rely only on praying. speed up evolution for us.
John Porter just because I am an atheist I'm stupid?
As a middle child I love this 😂 ha
MY HEARTS A SEIZING
MY LUNGS A WHEEZING
THE WALLS ARE MELTING
UHOH
Now let me think, what else can l ask these scientists to hypothesize about?
Mark, pay someone enough money and they'll hypothesize about anything...and unscrupulous conartists will package it in such a way that simple minds will believe it.
yup. hate wheat. makes my hair fall out, even without a fungus.
Bread, milk & honey is dangerous
Yes bread is not apart of our culture.
not me eating a bowl of pure grain cereal as i clicked on this, yeah i'll come to this later...
Wasn't it all in one night though and you sure the Egyptians believed in one God at this point
Where can I watch this extended documentary?
Does anyone know where I can find the whole documentary?
I think greeks used in initiated rituals, they had to distill ergot and process it. It was mixed with herbs, or other stuff and often in a watery wine drink called kykeon.
They weren't not white.......
Why did I watch this just after eating rye bread.😣😢
tragic stories are still used today. fear is a very powerful tool.
Prof. David Pyle sounds like Tom Hiddleston imho. Anyway the story is amazing, trying to crack open the mysteries of the ancient stories with science and logic!
I love how science is so deperate to disprove the bible..
MY COMMENT IS NOT ABOUT RELIGION, BECAUSE RELIGION MADE BY THE PEOPLE AND GOD IS NOT A RELIGION, JESUS CHRIST ALSO.....FAITH IS UNSEEN, BUT IT IS MORE POWERFUL THAN U.S.A.
The apostle James would like a word with you
They were gluten intolerant
Damn, the alternative facts people got here early this time.
i knew this fact a really long time ago
The first born would've been the first to be offered food. They would've been the first to eat. If there wasn't enough food to go around, they might have been the only one to eat. They would've been the first to die.
Then how come the Adults didn't perish? Surely, they were eating bread too.
Yeah the 1st born likely ingested unknowingly a fatal dose of the fungi infected bread
I thpught God sent Death Angels
Just one but yeah
Atheists however insist that that cannot be the case and look for something else
Idk man, 🅱️Re🅰️d looks kinda sus...
This actually makes a lot of sense
Why didnt the Adults die? Dont they eat? Also, what are the chances of all the children dying in one day? Fake documentary
Let me guess.. It was Barley.. with a Ergot fungus..
Isnt ergot like acid
Just like Egyptologist can make words out of ideology.
Dna consultants and dna tribes have confirm the African origin of the royal families of the amarna and the 20th dynasty.They belong to haplotype eb1b1a(v-38) haplotype of the people of Central Africa around the region of the great lakes.They also carry e1b1b(e-m215)haplotype of the people of horn like the Somalis,afar,oromo.U can email These American genetic companies through their respective website.
The movie “The Reaping” gives a realistic explanation for all the 10 plagues.
Wtf dalm Scientology
Keep it up
this is such an illogical argument, if the bread was poisoned and caused the death of the first born just because they ate the most bread, then why didn’t the richer families who has more than enough for everyone be completely wiped out and not merely their first sons, lol
really?
Could that be related to loctus
ergot makes lsd 25
How can the bread kill only the first born??? The bread didn't do it that's why
Sgt Pepper because the parents treasured the first born the most and fed them the most
You're telling me that it only exclusively killed the first born. That the second third etc. were never fed bread in their entire youth?
I think they explained it well in the video. It wasn't that only the first born died. They were just the most likely to die and died in larger volumes than the others because they simply ate more. If there are 100 first born children and they all ate and 70% of them died, then that would leave 70 first born childred dead and 30 first born children alive. If there are 100 second(third, fourth) born children and only 50% of them were able to eat and 70% of that group died then only 35 of them would have died and 65 would have lived. So it wasn't that it targeted the first born, the first borns just had a higher chance of dying.
Please watch the entire video before commenting.
Sgt Pepper you dense fuck
Ancient acid trip! :S
Good theory, but abit far fetched for me.
apparently the bread somehow changed skin tones hair texture and overall africaness.....
gaydarable ur dumb as fuck
gaydarable "We wuz kangz n sheeit". Ancient Eygyptian were not black dumbass
Josh S. even if ancient egyptians (which is a country located in africa) weren't black there are multiple other african countries that had monarchy's so you sound dumb
gaydarable they're called Sub-Saharan Africans. Educate yourself.
Ancient Egyptians weren't black. Leave that nonsense and educate yourselves already!
Damned favoritism!
cool
Well I'm the youngest so...😂😂😂... still very sad though.
Irony my ass.............................welcome to Karma....(perhaps the cousin of Irony) One child should not be valued over another. Since time has been around humans have found ways to dream up reasons why bad things happen. Religion is no exception. In fact, it is the number one go-to for the explanation of every unexplainable bad thing or good thing that happens in one's life. So ridiculous. The Universe is what it is. There are good and bad forces. PERIOD. If you put out negative energy, you get it back, same with good. It's really a no-brainer, which is good, considering how brainless the human species is..........Even without science and research back then, these folks should have taken a lesson on why the first born were dying off faster than the other siblings.....................I think it was both Karma and grain poisoning. They should have opened their damn eyes as to how they were devaluing their other children. Hierarchy be damned. The first born isn't an issue if they are dead................who becomes the next first born? All the children were eligible to be leaders upon the death of the elder sibling.......these people really did not think things through. This is why all of their children should have been treated the same and cared for the same way. Considering the mortality rates of children back then. COMMON SENSE.
death owo
Basically, you deny God having to do with this and you explane it in a way that the stories are probably false, well thats convinient... Lets do that for every story and shape it in a way you want it..
Bull
it's amazing what man will do to deny his creator
snake eyes It's amazing what man would do to prove him.
it is written that all the firstborn would die it's written in the word and scripture cannot be broken or changed
It also is what Moses was tripping on in the desert, LSD from ergot.
Moses wasn’t tripping
This is what happens when you don't want to give God proper credit.... you blame it on bread😒
IMMM SHOOOOOOKKK
This particular series is straining itself far beyond credulity to give some sort of quasi-factual basis for bible stories.
WWZenaDo I say it gives the Bible too much credit. From my understanding, in most ancient stories the story itself is actually irrelevant next to the message that the listener takes away from it, which in the case of the Moses stories would be stuff about the power of god and the reward that is given to those who have a strong devotion to him, etc etc.
I can't blame scientists for looking for grains of truth behind Bible stories, and who knows? It may very well be the case that events did occur that the people of the time did not have the means to explain, and thus these stories arose; but to assume that such grains of truth exist where none have yet been found is just speculation and should be presented as such.
If you stop believing in fairytales, this might make sense to you.
"Grains" of truth. "Grains." Hah. Good one.
+HippoinABottle wrote: "From my understanding, in most ancient stories the story itself is actually irrelevant next to the message that the listener takes away from it..."
It depends on which group of believers you'd want to talk about. For example, if we were to discuss the original writers & the people of that time, obviously they did believe that most things written in the bible books (the ones in existence at their time) were true, but with the possible exceptions of the book of Job, the tale of Lot, & perhaps the tale of Jonah.
If we're talking literalist, fundie Christians, then they would eagerly look for some sort of scientific basis for the stories in the bible - and I'll say right now, some of the bible accounts are factual, up to a point. The list of the later Hebrew kings, the surrounding of Jerusalem by Sennacherib, the conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar - all of these events took place. However there was no "angel" which miraculously killed 180,000 Assyrian troops, & the Hebrews who were dragged off captive to Babylon most likely weren't the same ones (or weren't even their proper descendants) when the Persians repopulated Jerusalem, later on. Etc.
+julio gomez wrote: "If you stop believing in fairytales, this might make sense to you."
What are you babbling about? "Quasi-factual" means falsehoods parading as facts. The program loudly declares the biblical viewpoint (too loudly, imo) & then later on sneaks in some facts that might discredit the bible account - but without clearly pointing that out to the viewing audience.
The Old Testament is a lots of fairytale,stolen from the Sumerians something is true,and some is false.
Everything in the Old Testament is true
Here come the Bible nuts!
The ignorance in this comment section is real. And I’m talking about both sides.
thats because people who works on science does not believe in God
I think you meant
“I’m a dumb fuck and can’t realize that mythology and magic and shit doesn’t exist, and science can explain my religious BULLSHIT easily.”
the plagues were brought upon by pharaoh for not letting the Hebrews go
Islam is the truth and this confirms it
Wow Smithsonian didn't know the Egyptians were white. When movies do it its annoying but its movies created by people who don't know better. YOU are a foundation whose purpose has been to cultivate and accurately share history yet you continue to depict Egyptians as white. But I bet you wouldn't dare hire black people to depict the Tudors.
You can make up all that you want to try and answer your guilt but in the day you know the truth don't deny it and stop trying to disprove it because even if any of this series is true I doesn't mean god didn't do it.
If you continue on this it'll only bring bad upon you and your family.
If you don't want to be religious don't be no one is asking you to be but don't try and deny god the painting can not say the painter doesn't exist.
jad please grow up
nowan knows take your own advice
jad I agree with you but there's bound to be more comments denying you statement by saying god doesn't exist and even though they don't believe people like me and you do
jad Crawl under a rock and wait for Jesus to come back. All of you.
Bangley sorry I believe in god not some bastard
So in other words god doesn't exist :) I'm pleased
God does exist
Haven't you read the Bible...