Can’t wait to see the PewScience data on it. All companies are going to say their stuff is the best. saying they have the best low back pressure can is only words till there is true 3rd party lab testing.
Me too. Data doesn’t lie. I will say at this point I’m impartial to how quiet a short barreled 556 is. I care more about how much gas I’m eating and the tone of the shot.
@@hunter-constantine definitely! That’s another cool thing about the PewScience data. The PewScience ear number is dependent on the amount of back pressure the can is causing and how it’s affecting the kinematics of the weapon and how soon the bolt is unlocking.
@@hunter-constantineas a lefty, I am absolutely most concerned about the gas. No sense in gaining suppression, flash reduction, etc only to hate shooting anywhere that isn’t a windy day in an open field.
@@armon8399 it will be for a lot of shooters. I understand why the price is higher than other cans on the market and find it justified. Everything is just creeping up in price year after year.
High Performance Computing services cost on average ~$0.25 per core hour to rent. Dude said they spend "millions and millions" of development hours using Sandia's machine (US Taxpayer owned) which has >140K cores. Assuming "millions and millions" is ~4 million core hours, the machine rental would have cost Surefire $1M+. Unless Surefire paid the entire bill themselves, they need to lower the price of these cans as the US taxpayer likely subsidized their development 🙂
When is the rc3 going to be back in stock ? I have tryed to order one from 2 different places. Out of stock . I love my rc2 556 and 762 rc2 along with the sps300
So what muzzle device are you gonna use for yours? Still the 3 prong flash hider? Don’t want my spread to be crazy big if I decide to take this can off
Similar performance in terms of gas in the users face but the SureFire is suppose to have better low light signature and there’s no round count rating on it
Thanks for the response, that’s pretty much what I was expecting/hoping for. I plan to get one in the future but I’m also happy with my RC2s for now. I’m also looking forward to seeing how the 762 RC3 performance is whenever it releases to potentially run it on a Scar 17
Try it; shoot it. There are videos of people shooting it at night with the four prong muzzle device at night and Ive not seen anything that would make me say "Huge Disappointment". The price point is the only negative.
@@hunter-constantine no data to back up, in my opinion, the KAC silencers are better performance. Wich in that view id feel more comfortable paying that absurd amount $1800 .. do you think this performs any different than the Rc2 besides a little less backpressure?
@@hunter-constantine thanks let them have it with a real review, it doesn’t appear to be worth upgrading from everything Iam seeing. Everyone is afraid to give an honest opinion about it because it might piss the manufacturer off
I work for surefire as a machinist. They pay me $496 an hour hence the $1800 price tag to recoup their losses on production
You must be very talented
@@hunter-constantine yes thank you. I purchased a house for cash when the rc2 dropped..I would now like to purchase a Ferrari from rc3 sales.
7:06 did a bullet wiz by you guys 😮🤙🤙🤙!!!!!! Sounded like it to me!!!!!
Damn sure did
Can’t wait to see the PewScience data on it. All companies are going to say their stuff is the best. saying they have the best low back pressure can is only words till there is true 3rd party lab testing.
Me too. Data doesn’t lie. I will say at this point I’m impartial to how quiet a short barreled 556 is. I care more about how much gas I’m eating and the tone of the shot.
@@hunter-constantine definitely! That’s another cool thing about the PewScience data. The PewScience ear number is dependent on the amount of back pressure the can is causing and how it’s affecting the kinematics of the weapon and how soon the bolt is unlocking.
@@hunter-constantineas a lefty, I am absolutely most concerned about the gas. No sense in gaining suppression, flash reduction, etc only to hate shooting anywhere that isn’t a windy day in an open field.
$1800 is crazy though
It’s a lot
Not really
@@armon8399 it will be for a lot of shooters. I understand why the price is higher than other cans on the market and find it justified. Everything is just creeping up in price year after year.
@@armon8399brother you could buy 3 dedicated polo k’s for $1800 lmao
@@GuacIsExtra99 to each his own. I'll take the RC3
Can’t wait to try it
Guess I’ll be the white elephant, when is the RC3 762 coming out preferably in mini and long configuration….
I’ve got an RC2 in jail. I want one of those white surefire shirts they are wearing!
High Performance Computing services cost on average ~$0.25 per core hour to rent. Dude said they spend "millions and millions" of development hours using Sandia's machine (US Taxpayer owned) which has >140K cores. Assuming "millions and millions" is ~4 million core hours, the machine rental would have cost Surefire $1M+. Unless Surefire paid the entire bill themselves, they need to lower the price of these cans as the US taxpayer likely subsidized their development 🙂
When is the rc3 going to be back in stock ?
I have tryed to order one from 2 different places. Out of stock . I love my rc2 556 and 762 rc2 along with the sps300
Hopefully soon. I started to see them ship out
So what muzzle device are you gonna use for yours? Still the 3 prong flash hider? Don’t want my spread to be crazy big if I decide to take this can off
Probably a war comp. That’s what I use for PCSL practical
@@hunter-constantine Interesting, does the lack of labyrinth seals concern you?
Pay down $2,000 in principal on my mortgage and save thousands of dollars in interest over time??? Naaahhh...RC3 BABY!
This guy gets it
Fr I’m def going to refinance my truck loan just for this
This was a commercial
What's your personal opinion comparing this to the other low backpressure suppressors?
Similar performance in terms of gas in the users face but the SureFire is suppose to have better low light signature and there’s no round count rating on it
Thanks for the response, that’s pretty much what I was expecting/hoping for. I plan to get one in the future but I’m also happy with my RC2s for now. I’m also looking forward to seeing how the 762 RC3 performance is whenever it releases to potentially run it on a Scar 17
$1700 is too much, I can get a KAC can for that price. What sold me the RC2 was partly the price point. Monkey shit
Not sure if the KAC is better. You seem to think so. If that's the case get the KAC. I think they are top tier as well.
Camera went out because even it too couldn’t handle the bullshit price they are charging. Weighs as much as 2 huxwrx suppressors lol
Like they’re going for $1350 online now
Really ironic first part of the video claiming no secondary flash, when if you users closed tine muszzle device it shoots fireballs
Who is a better kisser?
Matt Pranka or Surefire Daddy?
I think we all know the answer to that question
Got mine for around 1300
Cool
Still need to shoot this can off as well when it carbon locks on every use?
No explanation of the price?
SureFire … boom
Why not get a KAC (QDC PRT) can? They are the same price. I know surefire is good but dang! Definitely going to have to sell a kidney
I don’t have any time behind the KAC so I couldn’t tell you why or why not
🤌🏼🤌🏼🤌🏼
🤌🤌🤌🤌
This thing is a huge disappointment (own RC2, Mini2).
Try it; shoot it. There are videos of people shooting it at night with the four prong muzzle device at night and Ive not seen anything that would make me say "Huge Disappointment". The price point is the only negative.
What a huge disappointment... A huge disappointment for my wallet folks.
Irrelevant. At that price ill go for the PRT by KAC. Superior.
Why tho? Just curious
@@hunter-constantine no data to back up, in my opinion, the KAC silencers are better performance. Wich in that view id feel more comfortable paying that absurd amount $1800 .. do you think this performs any different than the Rc2 besides a little less backpressure?
@@hunter-constantine hopefully pewscience data will show whats up Because videos with people from said brand will always say is the best thing ever
@@Omar20v IMO the RC2 and RC3 aren’t even comparable. The RC3 knocks it out of the water.
@@hunter-constantinewon't have to shoot off KAC can when it carbon locks with the RC2/3.
This is all bull crab, waiting for real test and real reviews
Once I get my personal one we’re doing NVG and low light testing. Just waiting on them
@@hunter-constantine thanks let them have it with a real review, it doesn’t appear to be worth upgrading from everything Iam seeing. Everyone is afraid to give an honest opinion about it because it might piss the manufacturer off
@@dmdm9198 low back pressure is no joke man. I switched to the hux when it came out. We’ll see which ones holds to be the best
@@hunter-constantineany update on night vision testing? no real apples to apples comparison that are out at the moment
@@zohairnaqvi9734 I’m filming this week!