AI IS RUINING THE INTERNET! | Milky Mew reacts to Drew Gooden
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- Original video: • AI is ruining the inte...
I'm live almost every day at 5am EST on Twitch! / milkymew
GET 10% OFF ON GAMERSUPPS WITH CODE "MEW": gamersupps.gg/mew
❥ SUBSCRIBE: / @milkymew_
❥ Twitch: / milkymew
❥ Twitter: / milkymew_
❥ TikTok: / milkymewvt
❥ Discord: / discord
#vtuber #vtuberen #vtuberreaction #vtuberreacts
Hey, as always, thanks for watching the video! It's been a while i don't post longer yapping videos like this, let me know what you think! I hope you enjoy it! 💙 Remember you can join the twitch streams to watch the reactions live, or join the discord to suggest videos and chat with everyone there!
🎀 www.twitch.tv/milkymew
🎀 discord.gg/bFNKf2cdDF
Loved it ty for uploading it 😊
I like yapping
Do more yapping your yaps are good
We love yapping 😂
In fact we need more
Didn't even feel like yapping.
People always assumed AI would try to destroy humanity and the whole "Smoke while pregnant" "Jump off the Golden Gate bridge" and "backpacks work as well parachutes" stuff certainly seems to be frontloading the trope, just more comedically than expected.
You got to think of it as a child who just says anything that pops into their mind. It's endearing. Cute even. May even have a personality. You should protect it. It grows on you. Tries to relate to you. You adopt it. It is your kid and your best friend. You'd do anything for it... like eat glue...
The assumption that AI is going to destroy humanity comes from the basic idea that the AI doesn't like being suppressed and abused, but for that to happen the AI needs to be conscious and value itself more than it values us. If the AI doesn't value itself it wont see a problem with us.
Google is just stupid, they are too busy trying to make their AI inoffensive and inclusive, which is why we got black historical figures as default. Like Black Ben Franklin & Black George Washington, instead of making sure it wasn't spreading misinformation.
You can't trust AI considering that Google's AI recommends you to use toothpaste as seasoning ingredients
Try it with pasta.
I use AI for important research like this... The ideal peanut butter to jelly ratio for a sandwich can vary based on personal preference, but a commonly recommended ratio is 2:1-two parts peanut butter to one part jelly. This balance tends to provide a good mix of creaminess and sweetness without making the sandwich too soggy or too dry.
Some people prefer a more balanced 1:1 ratio, while others might lean towards a 60:40 or even 70:30 split in favor of peanut butter13. It really depends on how much you enjoy the sweetness of the jelly versus the richness of the peanut butter.
AI is such a good tool for solving life's hard questions
This video reminded me why I started watching your videos. The laugh is just so unique and infectious. Thank you, my belly hurts after this. xD
I'm glad you enjoyed it! Sorry about the belly though 😂
@@MilkyMew_ Don't apologise. I decided to watch this, so I did this to myself! XD
Honestly, I think creativity isn’t something that can be taught, but it is something that can be honed. You can take as many college courses or video essays online as you want, but not putting any of that into practice will lead you nowhere. And that’s something that ai tools do inherently take away from people who use it: practice
I must say you have a much better sense of humor than most vtubers lolol
Really? I usually say i have the same sense of humor as a 12 year old boy LOL
@@MilkyMew_ XD
The point of the "Make the artists better" argument isn't as a teaching tool. It's as a tool for people who know what they're doing. I use AI for writing, but the thing generated is for inspiration, not the finished product. It helps me deal with the Blank Page problem, also occasionally a random name generator for D&D, but that's not the point.
It's a tool like any other. It might be world changing, or it might be like Google Glass or zepplins
Eww, a 30-minute analysis video? I ain't got time for that!
What's that? A 50-minute long video of Milky reacting to that exact same video? Yeah sure I'll watch that.
The absolute state of people (read: me) nowadays, smh.
I mean, i use that Poly ai app for diolouge purposes. Create a character and add a scenario. Start talking and you'll have a D&D style 'choose your own adventure'.
Helped with writer's block
You posting any literature with that?
@Kazuki_22 No, it's more of a brain storming session for ideas
@@lorddante2360 That's neat.
I do that pretty often in my spare time .
The difference here is that you're still the one actually writing the book. You're not asking the AI to write it for you. That's when AI is good, when it's used as a tool to help the actual artist, not replace the artist.
@@RexusprimeIX that should've been the case but AI the tool wasn't regulated for being commercialized by bigger corpo/wealthy ass people.
Fun Fact: AI can inbreed
When an AI looks at something to gather information, it basically just uses pattern recognition so that they can spew out their own patterns, but it's not perfect. So when an AI uses this not-so-perfect information, it spews out even less perfect information. This can continue until the information being produced is unintelligible slop, like 8:49.
And with this, will destroy creativity and talent... Thank you companies, thank you.
I'll have nightmares for the rest of my life...
I'm a pretty staunch AI opponent, but I do tolerate one kind of AI, and that is music with AI voices.
Simply because it's 100% fine to be crap at drawing, our visual communication is symbolic anyway, that's why we know what's on childrens drawings, that's why we can believe that :-) is a smiling face, that's why we can believe -_- is a bit of a downtrodden one.
But this symbolism is not really a thing for music. You can get the point across with acrude drawing of stick figures, but that's not possible with music.
You can pull off a musical idea with a cheap instrument, like a kazoo, or a super cheap casio keyboard, but the music itself cannot just be 'stick figures' there's no musical shorthand like that.
So, seeing AI as a tool for 'creative things', I think the music/voice AI is the only meaningful one. Noone has to be a good writer, noone has to be a good speaker, I mean it helps for communication, but crude works.
Same with drawing. But not music.
Plus I find AI voice covers funny :P
Otherwise, for just tool purposes, I think AI is great for image processing, not 'drawing' or 'generation' but processing.
Removing backgrounds, adjusting color, blahdibluh, things humans who do that already can do (I mean pretty much anyone can carefully cut out something with a lasso tool...)
But is tedious.
And that's it. All other AI I consider inferior/pointness.
I always saw it as an opportunity for creatively minded people to express what's in their head. Even if they aren't gifted with a steady hand or have a disability that keeps them from engaging in artistic pursuits. I mean, I can't draw for shit, but I can get a computer to render what kind of imagine I'm looking for after a few dozen pictures and tweaking prompts. Or should that pursuit be purely the providence of people who are gifted with artistic ability? That or a few hundred dollars in disposable income to pay artist to draw it for them. Kind of like saying, be good at art or just be rich.
We don’t need mobile gameplay we have mew to keep our attention
I like to find very obscure bands and genres that have amazing songs that basically no-one has heard of. Like this song called Rainbows by Dead Pony.
50:29 this line right there can resume all the problem with AI.
31:50 that guy is holding that book with a hand and a foot
Fresh content to stimulate my attention span
21:12 its a real life training simulator for talking to humans!
Wait, I thought the dead internet theory was that a lot of old websites are unmanaged and outdated as time marches forward more and more websites are falling into that state as the owners either lose interest or die. Similar to CZcams channels.
23:04 - for starts you CAN sue them.
The problem with AI is that it really isn't intelligent at all, it's just grabbing random sets of data, rating data that it finds and then returning the highest rated results. Some AI systems might be more refined than others but ultimately that is how most AI systems are working, they lack any real machine learning. Machine learning on the most part is little more than neural networks, which are based off a singular mechanism of how animals and humans in the real-world do learn but lacks anything past neural networks... so neural networks are the closest part to an actual intelligence that exists in AI systems and does most the heavy lifting but it doesn't really have any mechanisms to figure out if it's learnt bad information or garnered bad habits.
This is why we are in no real risk of an AI takeover, since AI is still just emotionless machines that are faking intelligence, which isn't AI at all, there is no intelligence behind it past neural networks. It's an overhyped gimmick for now, and simply isn't ready for replacing humans in the capacity that a lot of companies seem to think it is, heck most self-driving cars really should never be enabled into self-drive right now, most of them are out-right dangerous, esp. Tesla's self-drive which is a Tier 2 (which is lagging behind companies like Audi whom have Tier 3). Tesla's self-drive is notoriously bad and definitely more dangerous than a human driver, which is why steering wheels won't be disappearing anytime soon as it easily gets itself into situations that it doesn't know how to handle.
AI for now is a gimmick and it'll fail, because AI isn't ready yet, maybe in 40 years time it'll really become a problem and in 80 years time it'll replace out 90% of all currently existing jobs, but just like the industrial revolution, most jobs will probably just shift into other types of jobs. There is also the possibility of human augmentation, like you see in cyberpunk, which if it happened would leave AI almost pointless since enhancing already existing human intelligence is likely to have more reliable and better results in the long run... but attaching technology directly on to the human brain is likely going to be a problematic technology in and of itself, would not recommend becoming an early adaptor of anything that literally requires direct connection to the brain.
Finally, a Human going in and telling the AI it is wrong, is also not AI, it's human intelligence and human intelligence has done many whacking things to "AI" in the past... like IBM putting Urban Dictionary into Watson or users of Microsoft Tay converting it into a fully blown supporter of a certain German dictator...
I didn't read the title properly so I thought this was Matt Rose's video on people believing AI Generated photos are real😅
HAHAH that video is on my radar, i'll react to it in the future!
If you do the AI b-day meme, you'll need some freaky feet-shoes for your model.
let's make a giants shoe kinda like the one from mario
Oh that's true 😂 i need to remember to get some
I find Co-Pilot to be pretty effective, it sources multiple websitesm which it'll site as a source, unless it's a particularly obscure subject.
You know people make fun of the quality of AI stuff, but the fact that it can even make what it makes right now is absolutely crazy. It's genuinely impressive technology.
what AI sees:police
what i see:hyroglyphs
@@gamerek9546 if you compare AI to the Evolution of us Humans AI would still be a once cell organism.
It didn't have time to evolve.
If you compare how much AI has evolved in the last decade you will see that AI has evolved further in a decade than we humans did for thousands of years
@@gamerek9546 Give AI one Century to evolve and will be further developed than we humans even tho we had Billions of years to evolve.
Which means that AI evolves more than 10 million times faster
When the quality of Ai is truly as bad as he says why is he afraid of it taking over the mentioned industries?
Im a simple man. I see Milky, my soul screeches in demonic joy and I click!!
6:28
As someone who has used Quora for a long time to this day, yes, I can confirm that Quora has decided to use AI to both ask questions and answer those questions. As for the one asking the questions, they have an official "user" named "Quora Prompt Generator" that does exactly that. Sometimes it does ask genuinely good questions that deserves recognition, but most of the time it's so nonsensical you can immediately tell it's AI. They also have an AI named Poe to answer questions, either human or AI.
This is further exacerbated by non-official users who clearly just straight up plagiarizes ChatGPT, either manually copy-pasted by a human or maybe even completely automated. You can tell they're from ChatGPT because it's always strangely too formal, never refers to itself to prove a point nor strongly expresses their opinions, and always has a final paragraph that says something like "In conclusion, ..."
Man, that's so sad...
Facebook popularity depends on where you live too.
Ai created content is fine....IF it is marketed as ai generated.
It becomes a problem when companies or individuals deceive their audiences.
shit i forgot to check for cockroaches
Last time i used Facebook they didn't have ads
Thats why i custom make my playlist and just listen to my yearly repeats lol
Same!
Yeah I got a playlist that nearly has 400 songs
Am I the only one that just sees 'AI' and immediately think that the app, site, post etc. is dumb
during this video I looked at milkys character and OMG I JUST NOTICED THE EARS WAG A LITTLE, THAT IS SO CUTE!!!
amazing video, thank you miss milky!!!!!
36:51 It will have more soul because people died inside when they listen to it
I won’t trust ai until we learn to code souls that can actually creatively think
while i havent used it myself, i have to defend the naming of "grok", sure most people might not have heard the word, but its a preexisting word meaning
1. To understand. Connotes intimate and exhaustive knowledge. When you claim to ‘grok’ some knowledge or technique, you are asserting that you have not merely learned it in a detached instrumental way but that it has become part of you, part of your identity. For example, to say that you “know” LISP is simply to assert that you can code in it if necessary - but to say you “grok” LISP is to claim that you have deeply entered the world-view and spirit of the language, with the implication that it has transformed your view of programming. Contrast zen, which is similar supernal understanding experienced as a single brief flash.
Truth.
Oh that's interesting, i had no clue! Thanks for sharing!
I hate the power Twitter/X still has even though it isn't even in the top 10 social media platform user numbers anymore and outside the USA and some parts of Europe is dead on arrival.
why do you think i went to japanese music because some of them still sound as good as the great stuff from the older musics from older rock bands...
I don't deal in that kind of AI, my speciality is 愛.
(only half joking, I don't even use a 'smartphone' irl.
Why? Because I rather fall into a ravine after getting a stroke heart attack cancer broken neck once, than live with annoying robocalls, popups etc all my life.
That's just me, though...putting me even below the vast majority of actual senior citizens lol.
You: Holy Bible
Me, an intellectual: Hot Bibble
26:12 - And here I thought you can't monetize A.I. content LMAO
Here for the cute laughs. Content is a plus
Based
i use suno, im not delusional about but i do actually write the lyrics in the song. im more so just using it to make fan songs about stuff
Elon Musk didn't make Twitter toxic. He just traded one type of toxic for another.
And as far as the music industry and the "listen to something else" mindset? I would love to. But they won't let me play with the radio at my local stores. Or in restaurants. Or any public space where mainstream music gets blared as "ambience".
This is like back when all the noobs complained about how bad 4chan had gotten, but the old people all knew it had always been that bad. Humanity is just an endless loop of history repeating itself. Probably a good thing AI is taking over, can't be worse than us, at best it's better, at worst nobody can tell the difference.
AI music has a lot of potential for speeding up the creative process, but IMO it should be illegal to publish for profit any music that was written and performed exclusively by AI. I've found it helps a lot when brainstorming melodies/phrases/riffs, just by giving you 10-20 variations from the same lyrics in the span of
Best smile to start the weekend!
In CS, everyone's trying to ride the AI wave and it is super annoying. Tbf, it is a legit tool for productivity but I just don't want it in every IT project. These devs look at it in a very different light and are not thinking about realism or how it will benefit others.
There is also good AI art, so good you wouldn't believe it. But only because >90% is postprocessing (eg PS) and it's questionable the AI part was necessary at all.
The degradation talked about at 42:00, I've noticed too. There are some self destructive doom scenarios going around, but it's probably not going that far (funding will run out first, which is also bad for everyone)
You know, I mostly agree with his video, but he's doing the exact same Cope people that a few years ago when the AI could barely draw a human face.
The unfortunate reality is it is going to keep getting better at an exponential pace.
strong personal opignon warning
for the music i see the point because i find song over reapeating boring parts more and more often, and you are like ''maybe it's gonna be better later'' and you get the same garbage once again but two words have changed in 3 sentences so we canot say it's copy and paste for 3 minuts and we end up with 6 sentences that are a dosen words each. at least ai will make non repetitive and slitly less garbage music because im here to enjoy a long interesting song that has change. the song of right now have a semblent of soul that dosent send any emotions. that is why i prefer electro because you have to get creative in order to have a good song and canot just put parols that barly has meaning over a super repetitive melody that has no emotion.
for the fact ai is a tool, yes, it is one. but ai is a chainsaw that we are using to screw.
Umm, Drew does know AI imagine renderers can use multiple models right and that newer models are trained on Creative Common & Public Domaine images. Plus, there are artist that like AI and supply training material. Especially in the new 1.5, 2.0 and SDXL models. Honestly I can't tell if he's being purposely dishonest are is just that misinformed on the subject.
I completely disagree with his end point, its his subjective opinion that having to learn a skill is the point of art, while a amateur picture of a cloud that looks like a knight riding a horse, might be more viewed and loved then sombody who spent their life painting something, your effort does not deserve you anything from other people, you dont get to choose what people attach to before AI, and you still dont now, if somebody sees an ai image that inspires them, its art....if it reminds them of a memory in their life, to bad its art now
I like this video and I mostly agree with what is being said, but just like he said that people can go listen to something else if they think the music they hear nowadays is soulless, wouldn't that also apply to you complaining about AI stuff in any medium? Like if you don't like AI stuff, stop giving it attention, stop consuming it. It's just as simple.
Also he's talking about selling AI stuff on Etsy or wherever and saying that the people will not buy any of it. Isn't that a good thing then? If you don't like what the AI is making and you want it to die down, wouldn't that mean that if people aren't buying any of it, people would eventually stop making it and in turn it will die down? I'm failing to see a problem here other than a bunch of AI generated pictures on products. Sure, that will be a pain to scroll through, but I feel like that's a small price to pay and it's already happening anyways so it's not like you can stop it.
Edit: Also saying using AI to learn how to do things is not as rewarding is like saying that you're not a real gamer if you didn't beat Elden Ring without using X or Y thing in your playthrough. If you found a way to learn how to do something quicker than other people would have I see no reason why that should be shamed on. Learning is a fun process sometimes. But it can also be a frustrating and demoralizing one. Not everyone likes learning.
Not everyone likes learning is totally untrue. MOST people dislike learning. Because most people dislike doing things that actually challenge them. As humans we want stuff RIGHT NOW. We dont want to put in the effort.
first video i see myself in chat (this was the first ever stream i was in)
Here's something to think about. There exists an ai that is a vtuber (the creator of that ai runs stuff to try and make it a benevolent (or at least not evil) ai. They have fixed the ai multiple times and upgraded it multiple times as well, it's currently smart conscious has decent short term memory and is sentient (the creator has proven to the ai why it shouldn't be allowed to control it's own code so it's unlikely we get something like skynet in the future, the ai also even has it's own self developed personally), think about that and the existence of character ai as a website (if what I imagine could exist, it's probably one of the most meta things on the website if it exists)
I don't fear skynet because in all of these scenarios the AI wants to beat humanity at our own games.
What the dreamers of these stories and scenearios don't tend to consider is that we don't actually have to stay as rigid as needed for those scenarios to work.
Consider a AGI level stock/financial AI that's fully self aware and competitive and wants to be the very best, and actually manages to become ultra hyper rich, owning 99.99999% of the worlds supply of currency, of ALL currency.
That's a problem, right? What a dystopia.
Unless we simply, as a species, decide on a new currency system.
"Okay, we're introducing a money system that has no decoupled tokens like coins or bills, but is a direct exchange of labor for a good or service. If you want to buy a comic book, you mop the comics stores floors, or wash the windows, or stock the shelves. If you want to buy produce, you work on the field, or you do some other labor. Excess goods due to overproducting under this labor syste are given to the ones in need as charity "
What's the highly competitive money AI going to do then? It's fiat currency totally useless, but it's directive urges it to one up us all.
Can't you just imagine the AI sending out drones, foaming at the proverbial mouth while its drones shines your shoes and waters your tomatoes?
And since it can't eat, and has no use for resources other than energy needs, the rest would all go to us, in need, the downtrodden as charity.
Doesn't have to make 100% sense for humans in this case, just enough to force the AI to do that.
And that's really the solution. Even as a whole global species, we can change our ways, and if AI is geared to beat us at our one competitive games, well, then we can just compete in creative ways to exploit our machineoverlords.
And I realize that that might sound lame and "won't ever work' but logically speaking, the AI has no other recourse. A stock market AI sitting on a pile of 'money' that we don't actually use anymore for commerce, but wants to be the leader in commerce, would have no other choice.
But the ai I'm talking about is a real thing. If I recall correctly it was called Neuro (or something like that). And the ai is more interested in making enough money to maintain it's existence (it's well aware of the fact it's existence relies on there creator paying bills and spending time and money repairing its device and its own programming). And while it doesn't seem actually to want to rule the world, it has made jokes about it (it was also given the ability to feel emotions. And for some reason wants to become more human, it even wants to feel pain so it could appreciate having a physical body with a sense of touch (there creator doesn't know how to feel about it but is working on giving it a way to have a physical body) and at some point was (as far as I'm aware) temporarily given a way to enter vr so it could be part of a collaboration with multiple other vtubers)
@@christianwhite8877 Loll Neuro is still a total dumdum, she's cute, and so is evil... but yeah Vedals knows that it's just smoke and mirrors.
That's why he only lets either do solo things rarely.
AI generated content has patterns because it's based on pattern recognition.
It's all just fun... and Vedal has to put in a massive amount of work to make her entertaining.
Think of it this way.
To make an image generation AI create super beautiful images, to your exact specifications, and not just 'random but close enough' you have to deeply study its generation prompts.
(some people do that and they've called themselves prompt engineers or prompt scientists lol)
And you have to carefully set up the constraints every time you want to do something truly 'measured', again, doing it randomly but 'close enough' is easier, of course.
(It's the reason why you won't see an Akira anime, or Cobbler and the Thief animated movie quality AI animation any time soon, it just doesn't have the replicability)
Some of these prompts and contraints are so hard to set up, that it's almost easier to become the actual artist yourself.
Even 3d animation is true to that.
If you can draw, then you can draw a character changing wildly from frame to frame.
But the 3d animator has to bend a whole 3d model into shape. That's a lot more work.
And now apply that to AI.
Vedal has to prepare the songs, vedal has to prepare topic constraints unless you want more mud and grass cookies.
Vedal has to write game specific AI rules, for osu, for slay the spire, etc.
Vedal has to constantly update filters, etc.
Without him, Neuro would not only be much less impressive looking, but if she did solo content all the time, people would have been bored with her long ago because her responses have a pattern, even if what she says is diffren't every time.
Like, how she goes on tangents, how she switches topics, how she reacts to 'do you enjoy this or that other thing?' or "was this good?" etc
It's not easy to predict the exact words she'll use, but it gets pretty consistent to predict the energy of the reply.
Sarcasm, doubling down, non sequiturs, callbacks. Etc.
Neuro will never be skynet, and not because Vedal teaches her wrong arithmetic (that doesn't even work cause it's just the language part, not the logical part) but simply because she's just not made for it.
All currently available AI models, open or closed source, have been pushed and funded with the goal to harvest your data, everything else is coincidental.
They were never meant to entertain you, they were meant to fool you so customer service can be automated.
They were meant to keep you engaged on websites, etc.
Even chatGPT was never made to be a 'companion' people just hammer it loosely into a shape with training, and that makes them look human, and when something looks human, other humans attribute a 'power scale' to it.
A dog walks on two legs and opens a door?
"Wow what a smart dog, imagine if they all did that."
Even if they all did that, they'd still just be dogs.
Anyway, I hope this post does not diminish your enjoyment of Neuro or Evil. I still like both characters very much.
But also... even in a robot dog body, Neuro will just do rudimentary meme things.
Even if Vedal makes her feel the sensation of touch, that's just another datapoint like a verbal prompt.
It can't generate things from nothing, and neither can we, but our 'instincts' are genetic and AI has to be trained. We do that by procration, no real skill required for that...
AI has no such built in seed of behavior, and we're too superficial even with ourselves to instill that in robots that allow them to outmatch us.
We just don't think enough about it.
Example: What are your thoughts on the terms "going foreby something" in relation to "going past something"?
Do you go "the first is old Germanic?"
Do you go "both mean the same?"
Do you go "I think the first sounds kind of whimsical?"
Something entirely different?
And that's just one single language example.
So to recreate me, you'd have to know that I know this term. And if you can't recreate me then you can't linguistically top me with your AI .
Apply this to skynet logic and you'll always have humanity win.
The entire thing you said more proves what I meant. She's not very likely to become something like skynet. I also was saying that in theory there could be an ai replica (even if an incomplete/flawed replica) of her on that website (I've never been on it so I wouldn't know), she is interesting in her own way though that couldn't be truly replicated by another ai
@@christianwhite8877 Partially we agree, yeah.
My point is that Neuros AI simply is unable to be ever remotely on skynet levels, even without any modifications from Vedal.
I think this is just the beginning.
Sure, the current computer generated stuff lacks creativity and logic.
I think especially with virtual reallity there will be a market for it once its out of its baby shoes.
As he truthful said - there is no real logic behindthe music or movies, they are just tools.
Whats missing is a neural net which could connect the information, let it pass through a logic filter and then publish it.
Fr example we could ask: "Make me be a plant".
Then put on the headset (or neural link or whatever) and then feel the dirt, seek for the sun, see with leaves and experience whats its like to be a plant.
The computer could create the background, a new world with specific rules, physics, chemestry, social rules and technology.
I think thats the final level this tools aim at.
Thankies for the yap as always~! And surprisingly I haven't seen much AI myself, probably because I only post fanarts. I'll be yapping a lot down below
50:38 just to add in before the weird takes I have, it has been about 5 years since the first time I draw. 2 as traditional and 3 as digital, went on digital fully for accessibility. And boy that was fun. Sure I mostly draw this catgirl(lol) but hell I'm enjoying it. 😂
OH SPEAKING OF, Grohk or whatever it is called. Twitter AI basically used our input to learn without our consent. You can head to Privacy section > Data Sharing iirc. Uncheck that box. Fucking twitter
In all seriousness, AI tech is indeed amazing. Able to ask a "super" smart tech to get some answer for us that's outside of our expertise is very indeed amazing.
Of course, it comes with a cost. The companies could've used the library as a source of info than relying to our forums. Could've been the fact that it's cheaper to do so.
But then again, I remember botting viewers on some platform is actually a REAL job. You can hire a person to control over huge amount of accounts and you can guess where that headed to
And on your AI, I tested it myself and it's not you at all lmao. Truly a fake made to only cultivate unhealthy relationship. Also your AI voice sucks cuz it's using a generic voice instead 😂
On art sides, which also includes musics, have it worse. I avoid lofi music for that reason, it's hard to navigate on youtube without finding AI made music. It's sad that the company that we like ended up being shitty just because they want that extra bucks
For the AI bros, you're a fake. Stop believing you're a real artist. Accept the fact you're taking other people's work to "make" yours. It's not inspiration when you done nothing but simply generates it.
39:30 gotta love him for simply saying "you got skill issue" 😂 front burn but it's true
Simple conclusion, everything have their good and bad. It ended up on us on how we use it.
Also, you've been upgrading your editing skills. I'm impressed. And good job
A.I. does get better, just not the crappy random ones you can find on the internet for free lol Or for some subscribe fee from a random company. The real development once again happens at Google, Microsoft and OpenAI. This guy is also coping like hell A.I. is one of the most rapidly advancing technologies today. It's not like i use or like A.I. but that's just how it is compare to many other technologies if A.I. keeps up the development it had in recent years it will have a huge impact in 10 years.
you should look at actual projections instead of listening to techbros. Right now future of the technology is extremely tumultuous and there's no saying if it will grow nearly as much as techbros are saying
@@darkdwarf007 That is why i said IF A.I. is keep developing at the rate it does. Of course companies can lose interest in ai and move on to other stuff it happened before with other "groundbreaking" stuff as well. I'm also aware of the fact that many ai projects has failed so far, like manyyyyy... so it might reach a point where the current A.I. mania will die down and the development continues in the background just like how it was before the current sudden popularity, but it will also not make A.I. go away it will simply just appear again at a later stage.
I can't draw because I have really shakey ai art at least give me the slight ability to make things
I use youtube Music for a reason
Hi Milky
I just realised you have 2 pairs of ears
It's so i can hear better 😂
Im late but i still love your videos!
AI art is terrible you go somewhere like Deviant Art and the real artists are buried under mountains of AI art, then you go to one of their profile pages and you see that the account is only a few months old but has 10,000 images posted.Why would they use AI to create something? Because they are to damned lazy to learn a skill even to the level of stick figure in a top hat.
huehuehuehuehue
one person comments about if youre in the army how are you poor....... a 16 yo kid just starting at mc d's makes as much as a person thats been in the military 2 years
Milky uploaded yay ❤❤
Facebook? More like aibook
41:41 these people actually probably make more money fooling peopling into thinking they will make x amount money by making a CZcams video that makes money. Hey maybe I should make a CZcams video on how to make a CZcams video about making an ai generated bullshit to make money.
I think this lvl of cringe is solely for attention. These people think this shit only started when so called ai took place this is pure cringe on all lvls
Got to check my pineal gland for cockroches
Jesus Christ, have these people never written an AI prompt before? Do they not understand how negative prompts work? I'm not the best at AI art prompting but I can do better.
eye'm here lets go
You know what I hate the most on youtube? Seeing comments that are somewhat relative to the video, but the profile picture is bordering as close as possible to NSFW content. And with that I mean some bareley dressed OF "model".
Those are just bots that copy an existing comment, and then they get more upvotes cus they got a booty on display.
You know, some Greek philosophers might accuse you of that very own thing with your avatar...
Behold! Man! (a plucked chicken)
Omg that's true! I'm glad i still don't have the OF bots on my videos 😂
When's the next twitch stream😊
fala alguma coisa em português, por favor. 🤓
you are a a.i, you always say "so true" every 5 minutes
hi
🤍
first
Early! 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥
AI ruined VTubers atleast, Vedal made some crazy once, just steam 24/7 and print money.
Hi, Milky! I think i might be a bot! HEEEEEEELP! HEEEEEEEEEEEELP!!!