Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
What CJI's son Abhinav Chandrachud said on CAA - Video from 2020
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 08. 2024
- A 2020 video of advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, son of CJI DY Chandrachud where he argues why CAA is unconstitutional has gone viral. Watch the full video from 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exclusive content, special privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for Special benefits: theprint.in/su...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connect with ThePrint
» Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/su...
» Subscribe to our CZcams Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
» Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
» Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
» Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
» Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
» Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintI...
» Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
» Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8
Due to this speech after 4 years of publishing, today in 2024 am able to understand CAA...such a nice explanation
Is the muslim personal law constitutional??
Is the wakf board constitutional??
Absolutely.
There is a hindu personal law. Are you aware of that?
Absolutely 👍
the point being why there are different laws for the people of different religions.@@devil1000ish
@@devil1000ishthe caa is def not unconstitutional
This is a democracy. This isn't the property of someone's son.
He just proved undemocratic laws have been made. And you turn around and call it a democracy.
Laws that take away equal rights of Muslims and provide Hindus with additional favors have been made.
Yes, Say the same to Feku, this is democracy.
Bhai yeh Modi ji ko bhi bolo ...aur desh ke saare netao se bolo bhai ....himmat hai
@@dhane7139 that feku dont have son😂😂
But radicals like you breed liks pigs
@@dhane7139 that feku dont have kids but one community breed like pig
Why say he is the CJI’s son in the headline? Just goes to show what credibility entitlement brings - especially for media outlets such as The Print. Or is it to suggest that this gives insights to the CJI’s thinking on this? Or, that we are listening to the third generation CJI - thanks to the collegium??
True. It's third generation of CJI.
Here, Abhinav talked about Parsis in
Afganisthan will be getting the citizenship in 5 years. It is the fact that Afganisthan is not a part of India, and is a different country, whereas , Pakistan is not another country. Pakistan is a part of India .
True...who cares who he related to....is there a dearth of young adv in this form ...bring others alongside
supreme kothe ki cchandu bai, apne is videshi-padhe ladke ko judge bana chahata hai, dono hi
Nehru.... Indira .... Rajiv..... Sonia.....Rahul..... Priyanka.....Vadhra......and so on...
So, they want to follow the trend....
The print is supporting.....
Genuine question- if one has to practice law in India, how is it advantageous to study law abroad, say, in US.
Law presumably is different in different countries
Just strictly answering your question:
1. all countries borrow precedence from others countries when they are dealing with a novel case in their own.
2. Democracies, despite having different constitutions have similar overall approach. It helps to understand how others approach/solve legal issues.
3. Elite institutions facilitate best legal minds to come together and build networks and relationships
4. International law and trade laws need intergovernmental understanding
5. Of course this helps the host countries of elite institutions to gain influence in the legal fraternity
@@veereshpmIt’s not that straight forward. Culture and formation of countries has a heavy bearing on constitution. Ours is the most complicated, it’s like writing a constitution for a continent not a country.
It's not about studying abroad. It's about studying in the best institution.
@@veereshpm You left the best point for last.
@@srikantpadma3573 India's own constitution is heavily influenced/copied from the British constitution, with few major localized changes like Reservations, Personal Laws, etc. But by and large, if you understand the British constitution - you can safely say you understand approx. 70% Indian constitution as well.
CAA is a law for people *already* residing in India as refugees. Abhinav should get out of his air-conditioned car and meet the refugees living under flyovers of Delhi since decades, a vast vast majority being Hindus and Sikhs. Legislators legislate to create maximum impact with the smallest set of rules and definitions. It's stupid to say that CAA should cover persecution based on gender identity - people weren't that woke in 1948.
Had our dear government been intelligent they would have realised they are already a total failure in employment of its deemed citizens about whom it cares so much that it forgot to conduct timely census but had money and time to mob moon . It has no zeal to create jobs but a zeal to seal the big deals.people in favour must adopt them 😢 tumhara hi pet kat k kha b rahe hain aur abb unko b khila rahe h . .khane do tum shayad ho hi is kabil.nagri andher ho 2 mtlbb?
I guess if this man becomes even a High court judge, through a collegium system, god save this nation! !
Its not collegium its collusion
He seems qualified for SC n fuck collegium, he has made his worth and might improve SC functions and mend BJP too...
@@sidharthawason955 there are many people who would be qualified in this country for the post, the question is if there is a fare process or not!
@@Life-ld9kofair system for what..😂😂😂yeah fair elections in Chandigarh 😂
@@Life-ld9ko that's why government added two members of government and one of opposition while removing the judges in the election committee that is to elect gudges 🤣😂 mental patients must get themselves checked regularly...
It is a SHAME that a son of CJI and an advocate who aspires to become CJI does not know the laws existing in the country. Jr Chandrachud has not studied CAA either. Jr Chandrachud is unaware that CAA is specifically for an identified group and specific purpose. For all other citizens of the planet, the existing law is adequate, and no need to repeat their religions, groups, ethnicities, etc in CAA and to abolish the existing law. The democratically elected MPs are entitled to frame laws in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. They are entitled to amend the constitution again and again, further to several amendments already made since 1947.
Jr Chandrachde is of course aware that atheists and Jews do face persecution in these countries because Islam looks at them as KAFFIRS.. He does not want to criticize the Islamic Kafir concept. Therefore, he speaks his mind about a new law for his Jewish friend. But there is no need for such a new law. It already exists in India. The religious groups that Jr Chandrachud listed have already been enjoying the benefits of the already existing law. Atheists, Ahmedias, Jews, Shias, Hindus from Sri Lanka, Nepal, Myanmar, and all religious groups including Pakistani Muslims have received the benefit of the already existing law. Example. Pakistani Singer ADNAN SAMI KHAN. Pakistani spies can also apply for citizenship under the existing law. The existing law has not been abolished. Please refer your Jewish friend to a good advocate who will submit his application under the existing law
Original Europeans, USA & UK citizens have now realized that their language, food, dress, and culture have started disappearing. Migrants have taken over their precious assets. The UK and some European nations have implemented laws to protect their original culture, language, food, and dress. Intellectuals in these countries who had been arguing constitutional rights have vanished from the scene. India should learn from Europe, the USA, UK. India should protect original Indian culture, Indian food, Indian dress, and Indian languages and choose what is good for Indians. Accept what is good from any corner of the world but gradually discourage all foreign unwanted things. Europe, the USA, UK should not happen in India.
Its okay dude. We know he is just an idiot.
Who could guess what he is going to say after they introduced him as a Harvard Graduate 😅
One officer told that #Harvard university is good #Havean for #Anti Hinduism and #Anti #Bharat #Creatures
I guessed it, my friend...I knew he should be a clown the moment Harvard appeared...he studied at a place where they didn't know what a woman is!!!
If the same system collegium continues he would become a nepo judge like his father.
Yes I guessed right that he is going to put logical and valid points that look at the law objectively.
All these people will understand in Jodi’s 3.0
Jesa beta vesa baap. There is no case to case bases objectivity . All judges are now ideology driven and cut off from ground realities.
Exactly. Instead of speaking about CAA applicable in this situation that has Nehru Liaquat Ali agreement as basid brought unrelated religious people even practically not in the list of 31313 people. He speaks Jews etc who are not in the list of people who applied for citizenship. What else expect from the print, the wire and the Hindu etc anti Modi,BJP, Hindu and SOROS cabal of people!?. Criminals.
Harvard educated jo hai.
@@rararazzamatazz jaise tereko bada harvard wale bula rahe the bsdk
@@subbaraotanguturu9271WHY THE PEOPLE OF ASSAM DON'T WANT "CAA"?
1) it violates "assam accord", In assam andolan 800+ people of Assam died protesting against these bangladeshis,implementing CAA will be disrespectful towards those people and for us!
2) muslim or non muslim, every illegal bangladeshi is the same for us, no matter what religion they follow!
3) it's totally different case for Assam compared to other states, because Assam is a bordering state, and throughout the history Assam is more affected and will be affected by it, not the other states.
4) compared to other states, lakh lakh bangladeshi is still living in assam and tripura illegally, now after giving citizenship, they'll move to other states or live in assam? Obviously most of them live assam!
5) after getting indian citizenship, bangladeshis will be able to buy
land from any area of Assam legally, and occupy government jobs equally! In some years y'all see the increasing competition for jobs, and mostly the next generation will get affected badly in assam!
6) The government cannot even take care of us and give citizenship to more people who are gonna cause more chaos.
7) remember it's not a religion issue in northeast states, it's for our language and culture. We will choose our language and culture first any day over any kind of religion!!
8) we will never give our land to a Bangladeshi!!
WHAT PEOPLE OF ASSAM WANT?
1) NRC without CAA and inner line permit (ILP)
2) NRC+CAA in assam will remove only bangladeshi muslim people from assam, but ONLY NRC gonna remove all illegal Bangladeshi hindus, muslims etc...I mean irrespective of religion from assam, we want to remove all bangladeshi.
2) The government can implement CAA in other states but should exclude ASSAM and tripura from it, As we already are affected so much, and will get affected more
3) ILP will prevent other illegal immigrants from entering Assam
4) The government can implement CAA anywhere but exclude northeast states who are already affected!! We need only NRC+ILP
5) and again lastly saying, you can implement CAA all over India if u want, but not in assam/northeast states...
I hope you all read this till the end...Jai Hind 🇮🇳
@@ambo26right and this fools don't know CAA is not applicable in every state which could blow the situation out of proportion
15:47 FOOLISH questions like this made U.K. abolish their law of citizenship by BIRTH. On one end he gives example of US but then he misses UK. So I doubt his intents. 🙃
He is a prominent woke in his circle. Nepotism product of Indian Judiciary
He is forefronted for this very reason...what his father can't say openly being what his position is. THIS MUST BE COURTMEN POLITICS...FEAR OF MODI😮
He is cherry picking. First gives background of partition and then starts talking about Iran. What does Iran have to do with undivided India.
@@Anomander5622 When was Aghanistan part of undivided India? Look I am in favour of CAA and it should be implemented ASAP but jews, parsis in Iran are persecuted as well, just like Tamil Hindus are as well.
@@adarshverma2014 Listen then. Ranjit singh's empire had large parts of afghanistan. Even maratha empire at one point extended to the border of afghanistan. Some 2-3 lac hindu and sikhs were there is afghanistan and now only few 100 remain. Zoroastrianism is not a native religion and so is not judaism. They are welcomed in India but through the normal route not CAA
And the Sri Lankan tamil fucking killed a Prime Minister. They are anti centre. They are tamil nationalists of extreme proportions. Citizenship is a prerogative of centre government and that has been mandated by the constitution.
And this land is not a place to bring all people from everywhere. BJP was very clear about its policy. It was in the manifesto as well. And when it has gotten the mandate by the people then it should be allowed to carry on its policies. You can criticize. You can change the government. But you cannot just stop a rightfully elected government from fulfilling its promises.
Abhinav Chandrachud very conveniently ignores the partition of India. According to him we should give citizenship to those who fought for creation of pakistan and went to pakistan! He can file a petition against CAA and cry there.
Absolutely.
So this lawyer wants every one who wants citizenship including Kasabs, Talibanis, HAMAS etc etc should be given citizenship in India. He didn't mention Nehru Liaquat Alli agreement which applies to Hindus of Pak and Muslims of India, why?
rest of world was not spliteed from Bharat @@xxyz2023
@@xxyz2023bull shit
@@xxyz2023😂😂CAA was also proposed by Congress govt for persecuted minorities of Pak and Bangladesh
@@xxyz2023 Because BJP is ruling the country at the centre and in many states. It's the BJP which cared to remove 370 TT though not related to Hindus due to that same humaneness It's in power only hence. It's a humane party that comes with Hinduism/sanatana Dharma not with people once involved in even crusades and another religion that on Jihadi mood since it was born in 7th century AD. Even LeLis who follow Stalin, Mao, Xi do not have such humaneness. It' exists in Hinduism/sanatana Dharma hence only Hindus.
@@manognyak6474 But khangress/ khanchrist party not felt that it's needed. A few humane, intelligent people who are not self centred but humane might have asked but where did act? Begged in parliament but not cared for Muslims vote as it's doing now. Though it any way not harm single Muslim what they had made out of it resulting 53 deaths in Delhi and more in WB etc and even doing now? Nehru family ruling the country for decades is a curse for Hindus. How many Hindus killed by jihadis through bomb blasts, targeted killings but how much it cared for them to care about Hindus of Pak and Bangladesh later. Why that much, did it care for Kashmir Hindus? Party become still worst after Sonia took over. Khanchrist combination after all. How could it care for Hindus. It cared for Muslims and Christians.
Sounds like a congressman arguing for muslims. Great future awaits him not only in India but in the wide world.
Mind Begs the Question:
- Islam forbids Usury/Interest Banking
- Those who practice,impose Usury
- To view Islam as Threat to Eliminate/Demonize,no?
Those who are against BJP'S policy ... automatically get the tag of congressman
Whoever asks questions or criticize government should be tagged anti Modi anti-national and now anti hindu.... This is today's India.... Is this democracy?
Mind Begs the Question:
- When Censored,Criminalized
- For Challenging Politicians/Govts rhetoric
- Made to conform without Questioning
- Democratic or Fascist?
Please listen
Let us not get carried away with Harvard & Stanford. American jurisprudence is totally different to our colonial laws.
CJI Chandrachud and many top supreme court judges are Harvard graduates. You're saying you know law and constitution better than them? Maybe if you lift your head up from your prestigious WhatsApp University, you might understand a little bit of reality
@@gormint3997 in harvard law schools they teach American & International jurisprudence. We in India are still tackling a colonial legacy in jurisprudence which is not taught at HARVARD. (Besides, as Indians we are enamoured by foreign University degrees). This mind set will continue for a decade more in all fields in India.
@@gormint3997just because someone is Harvard educated doesn't make him super hero, first come out of brain washing, everyone can be questioned irrespective of where he studied
Why are we seeking opinion of CJI's son? There are thousands of law experts far more experienced than this guy, but we have to take the opinion of his excellency because he is son of a CJI? And Chandrachud has given lectures on equity and nepotism in the past? Lol. Setting him up for higher stature in the academic/judicial ecosystem by ideologically identical individuals. This is how nepostism works. There are literally thousands of law experts and PhDs from great Universities in the country but HE will speak!!! This is how elite nepotism and corruption works.
Because he is the future CJI of India
Exactly
ye india he yaha raja ka beta raja banega wali ideology logo ke dimag me fixed he
dynast politics
Sadly we are still the country of Dynasties, here specially in politics the offspring of a known personality gets the same limelight without concerning his/her aptitude.
So the gentleman has pronounced the verdict that the law is unconstitutional.
He is expressing his opinion and anyone can do so under right of article 19. At time when the speech was given there was no subjudice case, so just stop denigrating someone just because he is not manuvadi like you.
@@Msaheb9740 lol
So He should be Next CJI???
@@onidoremc9490Let's see
@@Msaheb9740 OK Liberal, if CAA is unconstitutional then is Muslim Law board constitutional? Is waqf board constitutional? Spineless people speak selectively. Rare breed like Baba Saheb developed the spine to call spade a spade.
By his logic it seems like India is Dharmshala.
Is US a dharmshala? Just wait 70 years, India will be in situation of China with declining population and competing against Europe to get people to migrate into from Africa
your logic is countering by illogical statement. you can be critical by asking logical questions but we don't do that anymore. 😂
It’s not his opinion. It’s the law.
He is an entitled idiot!! I hate name calling people but his speech makes no sense. According to him, even embassies rejecting visas would be considered discriminatory.
@@habsa8855 caa is also...i know habsa you are belong to certain community and you think like that....
You m community people enjoy equal rights here but in those countries minorities dont have the equal rights...
And the worst thing with those people is that their mimor 13 ,14 year old girls use to get abducted and married off to their abductor aged 40+ yr
And even the courts their cant protect them from getting abducted
Once their parliament tried to bring policy about such practice but the mulana and molvies forced them to pull back from bringing that law..and their are many such things...
They ran away from their due to religious persecution
Thats why caa is important
Make sure this guy never becomes a judge, he is too woke and a Social Justice warrior.
He will not .collegium system will end in Modi's third term..no more bhai bhatija bad in Indian Judiciary..
@@santusanturohit4832 I think BJP is failing in advertising and marketing. 'Citizenship amendment bill' sounds very concerning, they should have named it something emotionally appealing like 'भारत विभाजन -शरणार्थी सहायता अधिनियम 2019' or 'Partition Refugee -Relief Act 2019'. Make its name less intimidating.
@@adityaghildiyal6630 I agree.
He and his family has achieved far more what your whole genus or all the generations future and past could ever could.
The collegium will make him the CJI one day, third generation from his family.
How can muslims from Bangladesh who came to India in 1971 be called as Indian Muslims?? What logic is this?? They can be called West Pakistani Muslims or Bangladeshi Muslims!!
This is how these so called educated fellows mislead. They always have the words RSS and anti Muslims for convenience.
Because they are legal migrants. That's how it goes. They were given legal refuge. And ofc their children are born on Indian land so they are Indian by default
😂😂😂ab liberal judges isse bhi CJI banwayenge
Nope Judges themselves will Judge among Themselves and will appoint this guy as CJI😅🤣
There's a procedure in Constitution to become a CJI uneducated andh bhakts like u will not understand these
This person, his parents should face Kashmir like a situation then only knows facts. He feels like a great humanitarian born earth and are to be allowed into the country. Unless he, his father etc are driven away like Kashmir pandits he doesn't know the facts.
Hmm yeah absolutely... autocrats only understand religion and all that shits which aren't a issue for country growth. And kids like u who don't know a fucking things . reason? Coz u r so blindfucked by bjp lol
Judges should be liberal. They have to stand against a govt that could go tyrannical. Moreover the liberties you enjoy while given by constitution, it has been upheld by these liberal judges.
He is indeed spitting straight FACTS
Andhbhakts won't be able to digest it though!
Bs. Indian Muslims are just a joke nowadays
The print is breathing fire on caa 😂
it's not your fault to vomit here, unfortunately u r a harvard graduate
Don't worry kid by the time u ever come into contention for judge role in higher judiciary India will have transparent system of judge posting and transfer. So that ur father connection won't work any more.
He don't need his father's help like you
Mind Begs the Question:
- If under a Indian PM/Govt
- Judges removed,murdered
- If Judgement not in PM/Govt favor
- PM/Govt is Democratic or Fascist?
Correct. Except that modiji forgets any transparency when it comes to: electoral bonds, PM cares to name a few! And why, CAA leaves out persecuted Hindus of Myanmar, srilanka and Bhutan.
@@astlinjthat's why his father rejected AIJS and opposes reforming collegium system
those countries arent islamic@@hema_raghu
Learnt a new euphemism for illegal immigrant: "Dreamers".
Used in a sentence: "Dreamers are sneaking across the borders into USA and Europe."
😂😂
"Dreamers" is not just a euphemism , it is an actual class or category of immigrant kids below specific age in the US
@@hussainmansuriillegal is illegal. Doesn't matter which country shits from mouth
Brainlet comment.
Article 14 talks about right to equality but in a certain “context”. If we take Article 14 in the literal manner: reservations, special schemes would become “unconstitutional” too.
Reservation is legal under article 14 because if comes under recognition of special needs.
@user-hr6td2gx6t no. It's can't because it doesn't go against the constitution. The constitution itself has given the right. This type of reservation which sc, st, obc recieves in india and black and Asians receive in usa comes under positive discrimination, which is due to the culmination of historical wrng that has been done to them as well as the present scenario. I do agree well off of this same section misuse it , but there are pple who still need it
there is no mention of reservation , grow up
Article 14 is not only sates equality before law. The complete statement is equality before law and equal protection of law under equal circumstances. Do refer charan sigh choudhary case were supreme Court have interpreted article 14 very well. And another point whatever rights we have got is not absolute under Constitution they comes with reasonable restrictions. Article 15 clause (4) deal with sc, st and backwards classes special privilege. Therefore nothing is unconstitutional
The judicial system today is pathetic because of overanalyzing like he is doing and not allowing any reforms. Once the law is created any exceptions will be course corrected. You can't delay the law citing such reasons and allow the persecution to happen. There are other means to attain Indian citizenship for them. CAA was promised by Congress as well.
Very well said bro this gentleman say that there is no mention of particular religion but in other words means....
How can someone be so obviously biased
CAA nothing to do with congress or bjp, any one it might got but this persons view is made u to believe that he belongs to opposition then that’s u r mindset is wrong.
@@gaffurshaik311 he is not from opposition, unfortunate to say he is wrong just being son of CJI doesn't make you right with any statement you pass, if you hear the speech he clearly say that "no religion s mentioned BUT in other words", why he has to paint things the way they aren't.
Partition was not secular ...it was based on religion.So the vaccines for the same will be based on the same premise.
Vaccine for what?
Partition happened on religion but we chose secularism as Constitution of India,, so it can't be any vaccine of religion
@@anujkr6039 secularism applies to citizens of india , and refugees are not citizens of India. Hence we can prioritise.
India is a secular country..... vaccine for what ?
Bullshit
Among 15000 Parsis in Iran, I wonder who would choose to come to India over western or developed countries. It’s not like they speak Gujarati there!!
Iran is not 9ur neighbor nor we had partition betwen Iran and India.
Not that they are too dumb to be unaware of this.
Ye lawyers, judges aur unake bachhe Constitution aur inake ideals ke chalate desh bech khayenge.
Iran is not included in CAA only Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh.
Like says a lot about your knowledge on CAA😂.
You clearly haven't read that😂
@@ChandranPrema123and you haven’t heard what this lawyer had to say😂
I find no logic in his argument. CAA is giving citizenship to only those people who faced persecution due to faith based partition of India and for that reason wanted to come here @@himanshusoni528
CAA is for those who already live in India first read proper law
Next CJI in making in this country of Dynasties.
What about Jay shah and his qualification 😂😂
@@nick-db8ik Yes, Explain me the qualifications of Jai Shah since for one ignorant section of people, he is the only product of nepotism in the history of independent India.
@@nick-db8ikHe's a great businessman and administrator, under his leadership BCCI is getting richer. Instead of hating on him you should check his work. He's far better than Rahul Gandhi.
Lol he knows he won't become CJI like his dad and grand dad cuz Modi in his 3rd term will bulldoze NJAC in both houses
@@nick-db8ikJay shah is not next in line to be home minister after Amit shah. That's the difference 😂😂
Just a high court lawyer. Apart from his father’s post, what is his credential? Why should we care?
if you don't care, why you are commenting? Also, why are all andhbhakts such chutiyas like you?
What's your credentials?
@@chinnu1964 his credentials modi bhakti 😂
you care, that'swhy u listened and commented😁😁
@@chinnu1964he just stated he is a high court lawyer
Each of this guy’s arguments can be strongly countered !
Please do
@@sanketbhagat7155 lol
@@pramod6898 no but do it tho
@@pramod6898 u can do atleast in comment section, atleast some individual will change their view.
Note: Be straight to the point to his statement, dont create false drama or political speeches here
These mf never talked about waqf board and talk about secularism
you mf never talked about RSS and talk about secularism
Had you seen entire clip
Did he spoke any thing about secularism!
@@gormint3997ok then tell me bapu what has RSS done 😂😂 what unconstitutional has RSS done.
@@gormint3997stfu mulla. Waqf board will also be removed. Just wait
Dynasty in Judiciary is unconstitutional.
This person is going to be the future judge of India by the collegium system
when he declares CAA is unconstitutional, he ignores that CAA is is a Stated Policy to eligible persecuted Hindus, Jains, Sikhs and Christians returned from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladeshis, to grant citizenship to them who are already in zIndia. There is already rules existing to get Indian Citizenship for others who are persecuted and wanting to come in. How can he not differentiate these things being a Lawyer should we believe him because he is son of CJI?
Why don’t you tak about shariah law
Please talk about Saria Law
what if he loses his head..
@@37sairam inane itna anti hindu Kyu hai
Jisako dekho hinduo Ke against mein Kuch bhi kah kar chala jata hai
Dam hai to Muslims ke against mein bolkar dikhao
Sar tan se juda ho jayega
@@37sairam to fir thick Hai WAQF board ke bare mein baat kar.
Wo ch*********ya hai to tum v ch******ya bnoge kya
okay i will talk about it when it is enacted in India😁😁
Another queens English liberal who speaks well who is picking things out of context. If it is unconstitutional he should fight a case , he also has his dads backing
He is a lawyer doing lawyer things, you are a potato doing potato things.
@@ratnadeepsharma964You are a Troll doing Troll things
@@Aragorneusyou will be trolled for making aalo paroteh
@@ratnadeepsharma964may be taking things out of context and looking for convenient excuses is really a Lawyer thing and impresses some people . But what you forget is that laws can only be changed by a majority vote in parliament .
@@okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Another Troll whose comment makes Zero Sense
Pure Wokism oozing out from harvard
Everytime a sanghi sees an intellectual his fucking ass starts oozing out
Wokism is not a crime. It is always right to listen to another view. Never throw away the bathwater....the baby could be in it too.
O yes ......his grandfather also supported democracy,civil liberties & human rights during the Emergency(1975) 😂😂
Btw, when I saw HARSH BANDER sitting next to him i was sure what BS he will going to speak.....Guys , recently HARSH BANDER went on Pakistan show where the chap spew lot of venom against Bharat !!
He didn't explain the provision of CAA. He directly says unconstitutional.why india should allow majority persons from bangladesh and pakistan. ? Also people like these dont criticize Nehru that why they have partitioned india on the basis of religion. He goes to explain what Nehru said in parliament. We would have been a great country with pakistan and bangladesh as one.
Oh nehru partitioned india not jinnah and hindutvas hate speech
@@vikramsivakumar2943'hindutva hate speech' partitioned the country? That's new. I wanna know more... Tell me about it
@@yourstrulytk12 Only if you want to know genuinely. Savarkar proposed Two Nation Theory , and partition was supported by RSS , VHP, Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League.
Let those immigrants come with their share of land and property. Why cause trouble more? We are already in trouble, genuine citizens are going abroad to earn their livelihood because of lack of jobs opportunity here in India and here the fools are trying to bring all the minorities from Pakistan and Bangladesh. Bring them all before LS election and let them cast their vote in your favour (BJP) . Use them as your vote bank.
Guys whatever happened let's not forget the history. It's our freedom fighters from all communities who have helped us to get freedom. Let's not divide and let's love everyone. India is an incredible nation and you will not find a single country like this having so many different cultures and religion and still in athe same country. CAA is just blocking majority persons from Pakistan and Bangladesh which are already an islamic state. But India is NOT a hindu country. It's a country for all religions. Hating each other will collapse our society. Britishers were able to rule us for 200 years because of Divide and Rule. Let's not forget.
Chip of the old block😀
Became part of Lutyens it seems.
Another entitled waste product with a filtered lens.
He carries with him the burden of secularism, just as white man's burden.
And he's definitely a burden on India. Poison is already in his vein. And God forbid, he'll become another judge and even a cji.
He must listen to what Subramanyam Swamy says. Very clearly he comes out in his talk..@@subbaraotanguturu9271
You mean Amit Shah’s son? President of the most wealthy cricket board in the world who also happens to be the son of the home minister of the country 😅
What is your qualification? Maybe a graduate from whatsapp University
Print ..Mojo .all these channels are promoting this
So the TV news media is just promoting BJP?!
There are many Harvard graduates in India. Just as he son of CJI he is prevelased and took the opportunity. Wah!
3:33 @ThePrint can you please provide the source for this reference?
This kid knows nothing about partition horror...I genuinely request him to stay 1 week each with both Hindu refugees and Muslim refugees...
Mr. Abhinav Chandrachudji, a very young authority on Indian political history, deserves very high appreciation and thanks from all truly secular minded honest citizens of the country, no matter what community they belong to.....they only know n like to be known as TRUE INDIAN guided by THE GREAT CONSTITUTION....ON THE ROAD TO DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PRINCIPLES.
Before going to debate or discussion upload the PDF of instructions on CAA. Ourselves can know what the reality is.
It's already there
We need J Sai Deepak as a CJI.
Does not matter who’s son you are or studied @ Harvard ? Do you understand the morality or value of CAA ? 🙏🙏🙏
It is such cinematic arguments that mislead young students, youth who have never known the misery of partition.
Well said, CAA is not only unconstitutional but also against the settled principles of international law.
Okay check out naman srivastavs view on this. Thoda time Dena h but atleast you will have a clear view on caa. Thanks
Come on BJP, please implement UCC and Ban WAQF board.
Is the wakf board constitutional??
Why boast of foriegn degrees. We have reputed law schools in our own country.
If u were to follow Article 14, there would have not been reservation, waqf board, religious laws, the basic principle of Article 14 is applied to Indian Citizens, not to the people who are seeking asylum, CAA is a counterstrike to liayakat nehru pack which was unfollowed by Pakistan and therefore gov had to take this step
Whose only claim to IVY League colleges is to be born out of loins of a Judge
A young Indian with a great heart, values and justice. God bless him.
Wakt bord, muslim low bord how to secularism construction 😂😂😂
Hypocrisy everywhere
BJP 303 MPs : 6000 Cr.
TMC 22 MPs : 1610 Cr.
INC 52 MPs : 1422 Cr.
BRS 5 MPs: 1215 Cr.
BJD 12 MPs: 776 Cr.
DMK 24 MPs: 640 Cr.
See the Proportion and Decide for yourself.
Conscious less people in India believe he is right 😂
Areey bhai save as muxh as u can...when u want a act for thr bahais and other minorities this act can be ammended...imagine explaing this much english and logic to a persecuted hindu person from pakistan.
These idiots want want a a.c room to vomit their stupidity...
They dont talk about reality their
They dont care about their persecution untli they get paid to speak...
All these libral thinks across india never speaked against the persecution of minorities their..
😂😅
I think nature of a country is decide by some degree by the kind of enemies and neighbors they have. Our neighbouring nation are non secular hence accordingly some part of our countrys law must be there to confront issues popping up from that
🤔 I find no logic in his argument. CAA is giving citizenship to only those people who faced persecution due to faith based partition of India and for that reason wanted to come here.
Breaking news : SC judge's son got one brain cell
Man talked well
Really well
But his arguments at the end showed his naiveness also
We should also take into account the present state of burdens on Indian exchequer we're not an affluent country and don't have abundance of resources we can't feed all of them it's the governments wish to fast track their citizenship
Not practical but ideological only. Why Jews etc religion people brought into discussion while they are not in the list of 31313 people who reportedly applied for citizenship. It's under Nehru Liaquat agreement in which only non muslims of Pak non Hindus of India I.e Muslims have such rights.
I can already see Honble. CJI DY Chandrachud's essence in the way he speaks and presents himself !
Article 29 and article 30 has been rebranded to accommodate minority communities from foreign country, this is what CAA is all about....it is as simple as that....if CAA is unconstitutional, then how is article 29 and 30 constitutional....the word minority itself means in comparison to something bigger, so there will be a majority religion to compare it with....
One of the most idiotic speeches- His services should be made available to Syria, Iran, Turky, Palastine etc where there are more problems for non muslims of the muslim country and solve those problems. India was partitioned on religious basis, Pakistan declared it as Muslim nation, but India didnot because Nehru was a Muslim (with fake Hindu identity). Later his party, stealthily included SECULAR in the constitution- not with amendment by due process.
What a clarity at this young age…….. By seeing youngsters like this, I feel future of India is in safe hands……
Actually i feel there is need for constitution to be reviewed periodically & updated to be really robust.
Just like how software require frequent updates to fix bugs & errors. Constitution also needs updates & fixes.
Constitution is not software ..
Does it mean when you have constipation, does rebooting yourself will help ..stop all nonsensical comparison ..
Anyway good to find few fools amongst the wise men
@@galileo9131india needs a proper constitution thats why regular changes needed....a mp in karnataka talks separation ofsouth from india he is still mp 😅
@@mr.perfect1067 agree with you
@@galileo9131so like things which were relevant 80 yrs ago will still be relevant today..
@@mr.perfect1067I can understand u r pain brother, bcs free fruits gives happiness. For employment u ppl comes to south with a plate and create hatred here. Loot our tax money to u r states.
Its half baked truth with sikular puddings. Division was based in PROPERTY Division as THE OX FORDS AS PER RELEGION... JN WAS a muslim planing for partition and convert
A confirmed future CJI of India, many many congratulations well in advance. Collegium system a gift to India and the irony is it can never be changed. Enjoy
Can "The Print" explain, why this video has been floated now which has been recorded on 2020. Next what standing does he has except being son of cji. This fellow doesn't have the basic idea of reason. This is classic example of NepoKid. rahul gandhi of judiciary.
Speech is perfect example of Operation Successful Patient DEAD
CAA does not barred any other community, it is not specifically mentioned they barred these communities. It is just a simple thing that communities( not mentioned in CAA) have to follow the traditional way to apply for citizenship and others get through fast-track( under this amendment) because the minorities from those 3 countries have data, reports not only from those 3 countries but also from UN about their suppression, murder, and offenses against them in the name of their religion ( it is not a myth but a reality). CAA doesn't bar others. why are we making logical and practical law a controversial topic.
This chap is only happy to be pedantic! The ground realities, foreseeable future circumstances are to be taken into account when you are propounding your bookish rant. CAA is very much a nice addition to our great constitution ❤
this guy’s reasoning is like my teenage son talking back 😆
Then I guess your teenage son is not yet blinded by hate and has a liberal mindset to question you
Then your son is smarter than you and you should grow a 🧠
😂😂look who is talking about bias and hate, did he mention anything communal or hateful towards him?? It's your shitpit mind that can't get over the hate you have harbored against everyone who has different views from yours, and that, my friend, is called the real intolerance😂,@@sserenity-786
Bharat is the motherland of dramic people, i.e, hindu, Jain, Sikh, bauddh and hence this land should be open to them if they are persecuted in our neighbouring countries. Do this people have anywhere to go.
Northeast tribal people??
Article 14 guarantees equality to all persons, including citizens, corporations, and foreigners. Article 14 permits classification, so long as it is 'reasonable', but forbids class legislation.
Where an act is arbitrary, it is implicit that it is unequal both according to political logic and constitutional law and is therefore violative of Article 14.
Same look like His Father
Like father like son ❤❤❤
Liberals found their new Prince after Rahul.😂
Video summary created using Bing AI
The video features Abhinav Chandrachud, an advocate of the Bombay High Court, discussing the constitutionality of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), its alignment with the secular fabric of India, and the unsecular origins of Indian citizenship provisions. He examines the historical context of migration during the partition of India and the legal distinctions made between Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims. Chandrachud also critiques the CAA for excluding certain religious groups and argues that it violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which ensures equality before the law.
00:00
Introduction of Speaker and Topic
Abhinav Chandrachud’s background
Overview of CAA’s constitutionality and secularism
Historical context of Indian citizenship
01:02
Secular Fabric and Citizenship Provisions
The unsecular origins of Indian citizenship
Legal distinctions between displaced persons and evacuees
The permit system introduced in 1948
06:11
Constituent Assembly Debates and Hidden Premises
Debates on citizenship based on religion
Nehru’s explanation of citizenship provisions
The permit system’s impact on migration
10:27
Exclusion of Religious Groups and Unconstitutionality
CAA’s exclusion of Jews, Bahá’ís, atheists, and others
The reduction of residence requirements for certain groups
The arbitrary cut-off date of December 31, 2014
14:01
Problems with Indian Citizenship Law
The shift from citizenship by birth to conditional citizenship
The harsh impact on orphans, transgender individuals, and ‘dreamers’
The need for a more inclusive and fair citizenship law
So Talibanis, jihadis from Pak, HAMAS etc should be allowed under CAA to make it secular? This particular CAA applies to persecuted minorities of Pak, Afghanistan and Bangladesh to rectify the effects of hurriedly created Pak on religion basis but left many Hindus among religious zeilots who started persecuting Hindus etc making them run from the three Muslim countries. So only non Muslims from there have such right that was arrived at under Nehru Liaquat agreement not for others, other religion people. This Chandrachud vomited Lutyens narcissistic view point to show Modi, his party and even RSS as culprit. Why he mentioned RSS. Did RSS exists then in present structure. It was Hindu mahasabha which was prominent then.
@@subbaraotanguturu9271 well, why are you proving yourself as anti muslim? Dude just lawyering and your just unbaked potato 🌚💀
Obviously, the speaker has has no idea of the hardships and terror experienced by non Muslims in the countries mentioned. thru forced conversions and physical and sexual harassment. The CAA is a small effort for these people to escape tyranny..In all the countries mentioned, the non Muslim population has decreased dramatically.....while in Bharat the Muslim population is thriving....
Like father like son. Such a logical thinking on CAA.
What is the secular history of this nation India? That this country was solely partitioned based on the religious lines? What was secular about that?
Why everyone especially the left for their personal gains totally ignore the communal history of this Nation, Indigenous communities of India has seen so many phases of persecution by the hands of Islamists, how can one ignore this when talking about the history of this Nation.
Its irrelevant man , our cries are irrelevant , these liberals will suck the blood of Hindus and their kids will study in Harvard and Oxford , and they will came and lecture us , about how to live our life .
Such articulation, truly a gem.
Another woke dimwit 😂
Is wakt bord constitutional?
Muslim low bord constitutional?
Really india secular state 😂😂
Thought provoking analysis it must be included in SC while deciding the fate of CAA.
Way in india separate law for Muslims
Why don’t you talk about this
If we follow his advice, we would 'throw the baby out with the bathwater'.
It is near impossible to frame water-tight laws. He is arguing only on the basis of the leakages in CAA, the obscure cases. Will he take responsibility of practical implications of his suggestions?
Btw I am agnostic, but in official forms I claim to be a Hindu.
Would you call Bhagat Singh a Sikh or atheist? Would you call Savarkar a Hindu or atheist?
Listing out other persecuted groups based on their identity or a lack therefor that are not covered under CAA in itself does not discredit the need for granting citizenship to religiously persecuted groups of the Indic-fold specifically.
I sincerely wish this Jr Chandrachud agrees for a debate with Mr. Sai Deepak on this issue. I am sure, he will be completely exposed about the hollowness in his arguments about Ahmadiyas, Bahais and Jews. He has no empathy for fellow Hindu and Sikhs being prosecuted in these Islamic Nations.
I suggest, all the high profile Politicians and legal luminaries opposing CAA must be sent to these Islamic nations and stay there for an year to experience first hand how it feels to live as Hindus / Sikhs in these barbaric countries.
why r u seeking a messiah brother , if there is any question in u r mind then ask with logic??
This kid has good points, hope to see him in action in big court room drama
wonderful insights ! we did of know lots of them. Thanks to Abhinav.
Provisions of Indian Constitution apply to Indian citizens only. Misinterpretation is unfortunate.
What a stupid argument.. by junior chandrachood. Creating an issue for a small minority is not a generic policy.
He said...People left India. They never left India they took some part of it. hence they have already taken their share and destroyed it and tried to destroy ours as well. But we have managed to save it. Now they want again some part...I am sorry we are not ready to give now...
Please read article 1 to 11 of the constitution you will understand what 'people left india' means along with PIO , NRI , OCI and a few reference dates.
He is no more important than any common citizen, why to tag him as son of CJI. We have already experienced great grandson, grandson and son of former PMs of india and we all know who is he and what nonsense he talks. Similarly. We should not heed more on what he as son of someone is talking about. CAA is here to stay fir chahe koi CJI boley ya fir CJI ka beta. Secularism was not part of original constitution, it was put inside by a dictator PM during emergency, we can ammend it as well without thinking more bulsh!t.
Not much difference in Librandu thinking of his father
I don’t know know what will happen to india
If he becomes judge