Another strong review. Definitely has my attention. Btw, Love the format you use. I hate it when there's a 10 minute introduction to the channel before you even get to the game. With you. Direct, consistent, no nonsense bollocks.
Good to hear the high praise for this one. It shot up my wishlist after watching Heavy Cardboard do a few playthroughs. Comes across like the dynamic storytelling of Nemesis meets the hidden roles of Discworld/Nanty Narkin
Thanks for a great review, will have to get this game! A question for you if you don't mind - what channels do you watch/recommend for board game reviews? Thanks a lot
Totally agree this is a great game. Once you get past the steep learning curve after a few turns it really comes to life. Definately needs a second play as you really have to optimise your strategy from turn one.
Speaking of Matt Eklund, have you played Pax Transhumanity? I'm still struggling to wrap my head around the rules after attempting a couple solo plays, but I'm fascinated by it. Great review btw, looks like I'll have to hunt down a copy of this one too
Going through the tutorial mission was a good idea. It gave you the chance to get familiar with the actions. I assume that this game changes alot depending on the number of players. When there were only a few players, Engineer was able to absolutely dominate and destroy the station quickly. Other characters did not have the actions to prevent it. With more players this dynamic probably changes. More people are trying to make sure that officers do not get to the bridge or close to the reactor.
Actually this game plays well even down to 2 players. The point being that the less players you have the easier it is for someone to see & block your strategy. Thus in your example actually there are a number of ways players could block the gains an Engineer would be hoping for, whilst maximising their own gains. A low player game can thus be highly strategic. High player counts are more crazy fun though.
@@egoDEATH33 Yes, but that is inherently dissatisfying to me. I do not want to "waste" a couple of rounds to prevent the opponent from doing X, while I am not entirely sure are they even trying to do X. I would rather advance my own goals as it is less risky and instantly satisfying. Perhaps with more experience this evolves to a more interesting meta plays, where all parties are hiding their own agendas and there are bluffs and double bluffs etc. Then it becomes more interesting.
It might a great game, but it’s the kinda game where you need the right group of people and at best lots of people to really empower what this box has to offer… not something I have!
Playing it this weekend and I'm looking forward to the chaos. I don't care if I win or lose, it'll be my first game so whatever, it'll just be a riot, I'm sure.
@@BoardGameBollocks I did see that but hate physics engines and really hated tts user interface. But this might make me go back and try tts again. Can't find a copy for less then 100usd in states now.
"If you don't like chaos, then f-off and play something else." Such a refreshing reviewer! Subscribed.
👍🏻✊🏻
Another great review - one of my favorite channels on here. Keep it up mate. And RIP to the run-up-the-stairs intro 😂
Might make a comeback like an overweight aging boxer
Another strong review. Definitely has my attention. Btw, Love the format you use. I hate it when there's a 10 minute introduction to the channel before you even get to the game. With you. Direct, consistent, no nonsense bollocks.
👍🏻
Good to hear the high praise for this one. It shot up my wishlist after watching Heavy Cardboard do a few playthroughs. Comes across like the dynamic storytelling of Nemesis meets the hidden roles of Discworld/Nanty Narkin
It tells a great story that tends to shift in around 3 acts. Love this game to bits…it’s a mad time to be had
Like others have said, love these videos!!!! You are definitely my favorite reviewer! Keep it up mate.
They’ll have to kill me to make me stop
“This game is too much for my wife and most of my mates. So my mum was playing the other day and…” 😂
I thought the same thing. 😂 His Mum was playing! That's hilarious.
My mum has a history degree 🤷♂️
Honestly a win for mum.
Great video, mate, got me wanting this game! You got a new subscriber, love your style, man. So different, so real, so refreshing. Nice one, geezer 👍🏻
Cheers mate 👍🏻
"It's no good putting less on because you won't be able to do fuck all with'em." This might just be my new favorite board game channel. 😂
Thank you for this delightful review! Insightful, thorough and funny as heck.
👍🏻
Sounds like SpaceStation 13: The Boardgame. Can't believe that I have only just learned about it.
and the makers didnt even know of SpaceStation13
The best thing is you can play a Chmip in this game and say things like "I Chimp Out", and fully realize your Chimp potential.
Thanks for a great review, will have to get this game! A question for you if you don't mind - what channels do you watch/recommend for board game reviews? Thanks a lot
I don’t watch any
This one is all you need 😉
Totally agree this is a great game. Once you get past the steep learning curve after a few turns it really comes to life. Definately needs a second play as you really have to optimise your strategy from turn one.
Absolutely amazing. Also beast to teach, I did only once and unfortunately everyone else got overwhelmed by rules.
Think I need to try and pick this one up, sometimes you need that chaos on the table. Great channel.
GOTY for me so far
Looks clever and all that, but I am with your missus and the other refuseniks.
Heresy! Danny Foster was my fave…
Speaking of Matt Eklund, have you played Pax Transhumanity? I'm still struggling to wrap my head around the rules after attempting a couple solo plays, but I'm fascinated by it.
Great review btw, looks like I'll have to hunt down a copy of this one too
I’ve not played it I’m afraid.
Going through the tutorial mission was a good idea. It gave you the chance to get familiar with the actions. I assume that this game changes alot depending on the number of players. When there were only a few players, Engineer was able to absolutely dominate and destroy the station quickly. Other characters did not have the actions to prevent it. With more players this dynamic probably changes. More people are trying to make sure that officers do not get to the bridge or close to the reactor.
It done my head in.
Actually this game plays well even down to 2 players. The point being that the less players you have the easier it is for someone to see & block your strategy. Thus in your example actually there are a number of ways players could block the gains an Engineer would be hoping for, whilst maximising their own gains. A low player game can thus be highly strategic. High player counts are more crazy fun though.
@@egoDEATH33 Yes, but that is inherently dissatisfying to me. I do not want to "waste" a couple of rounds to prevent the opponent from doing X, while I am not entirely sure are they even trying to do X. I would rather advance my own goals as it is less risky and instantly satisfying.
Perhaps with more experience this evolves to a more interesting meta plays, where all parties are hiding their own agendas and there are bluffs and double bluffs etc. Then it becomes more interesting.
Have you actually played it?
Have you played any other Matt Eklund’s games ? Porfiriana, kriegbot, transhumanity, etc? If not you should
I do have High Frontier 4 All and the expansions…does that count?
Have you played it? Haha
Get porfiriana it’s amazing!
@@BoardGameBollocks Well, that Ekland is the father, Phil. Seems the apple doesn't fall far from the tree with respect to quality games.
It might a great game, but it’s the kinda game where you need the right group of people and at best lots of people to really empower what this box has to offer… not something I have!
Tragedy
@@BoardGameBollocks hahaha love the straight answer
Thanks for the great review. Sounds interesting, unlikely to find anyone to pkay it with.
Playing it this weekend and I'm looking forward to the chaos. I don't care if I win or lose, it'll be my first game so whatever, it'll just be a riot, I'm sure.
Good attitude to have with this one
We want run up the stairs back booooo!!
I wish my group could play heavier games
Put your foot down
This would be awesome on boardgamearena but so big doubt that will ever happen
It may be on TTS. There’s a tutorial on CZcams that uses a computer based version.
@@BoardGameBollocks I did see that but hate physics engines and really hated tts user interface. But this might make me go back and try tts again. Can't find a copy for less then 100usd in states now.
So this is among us the board game?
Not really but you can see the influence
Oi Geeza, whats it like solo?
Played it once solo just to get to grips. It’s fine but shines with high player count.
@@BoardGameBollocksis running the scripts as tricky as it seems?
Scripts?
@@BoardGameBollocks the solo “scripts” on each character card mate
Oh right. I played a multiplayer game solo so I dunno.
Fantastic game! But a beast to teach and the "how to play" manual is (as mentioned) rubbish..
I love chaos and I hate this fucking game for exactly the "unfair" reasons you mentioned in the cons. It really feels like bad design.
It’s a masterpiece.
List of completely "fair" games: checkers or chess.
@jimalexander687 they’re not fair as white always goes first
бля как сложно тебя слушать мужик
Ummm…yea I agree 🙃