Author Lisa Pease on Robert F. Kennedy assassination, CIA-LAPD alleged cover-up: Part 2
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 01. 2024
- Researcher and author Lisa Pease discusses her work, "A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy." WATCH PART 1: • Author Lisa Pease on R...
Subscribe to FOX 11 on CZcams: / @foxla
Watch more FOX 11 on CZcams:
Police Chases: • Police Chases
Brazen Crime: • Brazen Crime
Homeless Crisis: • Homeless Crisis
I would also like her to come back and discuss MKULTRA and how it's tied into Sirhan's hypnosis.
yes!!! looking forward to part 3!!!
It is clear that Sirhan had played a game with the detectives, faking the hypnosis; and that he was lying about having remorse. In fact, at times over the years, he seems to be trying to hide that he was glad he'd done it and felt like it made him some sort of hero.
Though Sirhan has long maintained that he has no recollection of the assassination he did go to a shooting range earlier in the day of the assassination, and had written in his notebook that RFK must die. During his trial, he actually admitted to the assassination, but later recanted saying the confession was part of his defense lawyer’s strategy to spare him the death penalty, rather than argue his innocence. Then, in the early 90’s he claimed he was hypnotized: programmed to kill, programmed to forget. Takeaway: If you don’t like Sirhan’s one true version, well…he’s got others...
Lisa is the best
Lisa you are the GOAT RFK assassination researcher! Thank you for this wonderful video series!
The book is the "Rosetta Stone" of the RFK assassination. If you want to know all you can know about what happened and why it happened and likely who is behind it -- then this the book for you. Endlessly fascinating. Oliver Stone could make a great film from this if he could find a hook for the story like Jim Garrison with "JFK".
Except Oliver Stone does not care about facts. He cares about his $$$
This is a great book with thorough information. If anybody has any criticisms please explain in detail.
I didn’t like something she echoed in part III and I can’t be certain it was presented similarly when I read the book or not and acknowledge the recency bias may have led me to recall that it had - but the weight she puts on her experience with the hypnotized lady isn’t persuasive to me. The historical record is more persuasive to me. The reason I don’t like her putting so much weight into her anecdotal experience with the woman w the money is I’ve been to those things and there literally are actors in the audience. I engaged with one who admitted as much. Did she know the lady?
Btw otherwise I loved the book well reaseaeched
I buy into the two gun theory although I think it would be kinda difficult to pull off in a condensed crowded area. But I tend to differ with sirhan at the time of the shooting. He had clear knowledge of what he was doing. He later told Robert kaiser that he didn't shoot him between the eyes because Kennedy turned his head at the last second. And when he was taken into custody at the ambassador he told Jesse Unruh he did it for his country
I love u so much...
Does she have anything to corroborate that his attorney knew that sinking case = less punishment for him?
Oh my God, Sirhan is innocent!! The sad thing is Ethel and Bobby's kids do not want to run an investigation into Bobby's death. Caroline Kennedy to this day, has not wanted to investigate who killed her dad. The King family did not believe that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King Jr.
I'm loving this great information, but there is a factual error I have to correct. I have never met a single person who is not hypnotizable. I suppose it's theoretically possible for such a person to exist, but as a hypnotist I have never met them. Basically, if you want to know if you are hypnotizable, ask yourself the following questions:
1) Have you EVER enjoyed a movie?
2) Have you EVER enjoyed a TV show?
3) Have you EVER enjoyed a book?
4) Have you EVER enjoyed a sporting event as an observer?
5) Have you EVER gotten so caught up in your travel (driving, riding the bus, etc.) and missed your exit/stop/etc.?
There are more examples, but I'll stop there. If you answered yes to doing even one of these things even one time you are hypnotizable. These are all examples of trances. If you can't go into a trance, you are incapable of enjoying a movie, TV show, documentary, book, etc. Engaging the imagination is a trance. Now it's true that not everyone goes equally into every trance, and what might put one person into a deep, pleasurable trance could put another person into a homicidal rage (which is also a trance response to the stimulus). And yes, there might be some movies that just don't put you into a trance - and that may specifically be why you don't like them. The same is true of every other activity on the list and more. Also, you can actively fight trance if you want to. If you go to the movie theater and your favorite movie of all time is playing, you can still try to spend the entire movie focusing on the color of the carpet and the hinges that make the chairs go up and down and the shape of various kernels of popcorn on the floor. You'll go into a different trance, but you will actively fight the obvious trance of watching the movie. If you don't want to go into trance with a hypnotist, assuming they aren't being covert and and are actively honoring your free will, which they should do, you won't go into that trance. If you REALLY WANT to go into trance, but you happen to get the wrong hypnotist, you may not go into trance with that hypnotist. Some hypnotists speak really slowly. Some people find a really slow hypnotist very soothing and go right in. Others find a really slow hypnotist to be boring and insufferable and will keep popping out. Other hypnotists are much more dynamic and may keep one subject engaged, but they might frighten the other subject out of trance. There are so many layers to technique. But pair a wiling subject with a willing hypnotist who is a good fit for that particular subject, and I have never met the person who is not capable of going into trance.
So the almost killer of Carter had the Harvey and Lee in his name…strange
If you look at his Robert Kennedy the fatal shot was behind his right ear the original shooter didn't shot behind the ear that was one of the men on his team who did that shot
We know came security Guard.
Chief parke4 RFK Intellgence murder
G2 ARMY ONI
What a load of crap!
What do you specifically object to?
You are uniformed. You have no idea about anything in the case.
@user-ll2yj3hy4c Actually, I'm not uninformed about it. And I likely know a whole helluva lot more than you!
@@user-ll2yj3hy4c Too many bullets. Impossible for Sirhan to inflict the wounds when Kennedy never turned his back to him. Noguchi's autopsy was impeccable.
I'm sorry, Gary. I was replying to two-lane. I thought Lisa's book was great.@@garysouza95