SBS Transit Trunk 162 Hyperlapse

Sad day today, bus 162 has been massacred into a scam service, travelling from Yio Chu Kang Int to Sin Ming drive in a loop very slowly.
Bus 162 passes through AMK Ave 6/8, Bishan St 22, Sin Ming Ave, Upper Thomson Rd, Shunfu Rd and Sin Ming Rd/Dr
DATE RECORDED: 17/12/23
BUS REGO: SG1082U
MUSIC USED:
Song: LarsM & Side-B ft. Aloma Steele - Over (Dropouts Remix) [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds
Free Download/Stream: ncs.io/dropouts...
Watch: • LarsM & Side-B ft. Alo...
Levianth & Axol - Remember (feat. The Tech Thieves) [NCS Release]
• Levianth & Axol - Reme...
Track: Killabyte - Wicked Ways (feat. Danyka Nadeau) [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
Watch: • Killabyte - Wicked Way...
Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/WickedWa...
Track: Egzod - Paper Crowns ft. Leo The Kind (Nurko Remix) [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
Watch: • Egzod - Paper Crowns f...
Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/PaperCro...

[@themaintrainost]

75 coming next year for all those asking

[@RT-qk6jg]

@themaintrainost that is not true, you need to upload next week because the OST makes reserving for route visuals. So from 17 December 2023, bus 75 goes from gali batu to bukit merah.

[@sgstuff1152]

@@RT-qk6jghe means that his updated video for 75 comes next year, not when the amendment takes place

[@ProTheRobloxer]

I agree with the description lol, I have a feeling they should just withdraw the entire route as a whole

[@USS_BSG75]

Would Thomson East Coast line stage 4 then more bus will be amended

[@BaySean]

Yes even the zodiac but route GA bus svc 12.

[@yellowcupgal5188]

853M probably gonna die
196e will also probably die
36 will be safe until the TEL Airport extension opens
196 & 197 either of them would probably be in danger
14 will be safe
10 will probably be amended to serve the new stations

[@BaySean]

5:55 turning into Marymount Lane like what 410W formerly did till 12 years ago.

[@yellowcupgal5188]

I feel like the bus stop around Marymount Road towards back to YCK Interchange should be relocated a bit further back to connect Sin Ming residents to Marymount MRT during morning peak, it's kinda pointless when 162 is unable to connect to the CCL in the return direction anyway.
However, due to the construction of the NS Corridor, it's quite difficult to do so for the time being, but just one gripe I had when it comes to its Sin Ming amendment.

[@yellowcupgal5188]

Yes 410W exists, but even then I must reiterate the extended travel time of 162 from Sin Ming Drive just to reach the TEL.

[@yellowcupgal5188]

And again, 410 already connects to the TEL as well!

[@yellowcupgal5188]

Plus the route around Sin Ming is a chaotic mess too...

[@RT-qk6jg]

emotional damage

[@BaySean]

That's a low profile bus route.. like why SBS bus 22 need to be amended..
Both serve PM Lee's GRC at Teck Ghee right?

[@pata-hs1qr]

Did you know before downtown line 3 22 was majority double decker bus fleet with double decker buses going to 136 before 136 was handed to go ahead?

[@angelbex3]

How about 75 D1,D2 and 132 D1 and D2

[@RT-qk6jg]

75 will come soon, and 132 was done by Transit Evolution

[@masterbeanpersonal2868]

What's that meme about in this video? Hope that your 75 D1, 75 D2, 160 and 963e D1 videos will be much better

[@user-om5ex8oy5n]

WHAT ABOUT 75

[@AxelRaffasya]

Fast