Hornady SST vs Nosler Ballistic Tip vs Barnes TTSX Water Test, Weight Retention and More!
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 06. 2021
- Water testing the Hornady SST and Nosler Ballistic Tip against the Barnes TTSX.. Watch how the bullets smash through the water containers and which bullet you would choose for deer hunting or perhaps not based on the results!
- Sport
With all the options available, I've used many of them in over thirty-plus years of handloading. I find the complete line of Nosler bullets to my liking. The Ballistic Tips bullets were what I learned to handload with. The Partition and AccuBond LR are my bullets of choice these days.
Impossible to find,and hard to buy and no go broke💀
Great video!
I've used both unbonded rapid expansion bullets (SST) and controlled expansion penetration bullets (TTSX) on WT deer. In my experience the Barnes TTSX have superior terminal ballistics in terms of cleaner, faster kills plus less meat loss. Also the TTSX can penetrate heavy bones on large moose at long ranges and still wreck the vitals and still produce an exit wound. Exit wounds are crucial for producing a reliable blood trail for tracking and recovering game. I would never use SST or Nosler BT or the like on larger game with heavy shoulder bones. Also to have success with any bullet choice always limit your maximum range to ensure the bullet velocity stays above the minimum velocity for reliable expansion. Also the rule of thumb I use is 1400ftlbs min. energy for moose and elk and 1000ftlbs min. energy for deer. If you can't exceed ur velocity and energy minimums, stalk more and get closer. Cheers!
100 % agree. Also plastic has a different effect on the projectile compared to leather and flesh.
Personally, I've used Hornady SST 150gr and InterLock 180gr with pretty good results in my .308 on Gemsbok. I'm now using AccuBond 165gr and had really good results first time out with them. Bullet stopped under the hide on the other side after breaking the front leg and severing the important arteries over the heart.
Had the opposite experience. I wanted to like the copper bullets because I heard they had less meat damage while still being effective and left no lead fragments in meat. So I hand loaded some 80gr ttsx in a 257wby going 3800 fps and some 160gr ttsx for a 340 wby, and 142gr in a 7x61. They all performed very poorly on game. I nearly lost a nice buck I shot at 325 yards with the 257. Perfect shot but zero blood and the deer ran 2-300 yards. The bullet did not expand despite having an impact velocity of around 2800fps. I lost a 400 pound bear shot with the 340 at only 100 yards off a steady rest. It ran about 500 yards before crossing a river and climbing a cliff on the other side. Same story for other animals shot with copper. Next year had a similar shot on a bear with the 340 but used 210gr partitions and it dropped right there. A good bonded or partition style bullet is far superior.
@@Nick-sx6jm That is unfortunate!… definitely use what works best for you!… For us the barnes have worked splendidly on the moose and deer we have harvested and every barnes bullet we have ever recovered was fully expanded with full weight retention.
Bonded bullets and partitions are also great. It is nice that we have so many choices.
Cheers
@Nick-sx6jm so far 120 grain barrns bullets have worked amazing for me out to 350 yards they have often dropped deer on the spot like you have found the off switch, speed is the key as the ranges become longer and the velocity less I prefer bonded bullets. In all honesty most of my deer are shot inside 200 yards and often within 50 yards, my longest shot on a deer so far is 480 meters, if you can get closer and are going to have to recover the animals anyway it doesn't make a lot of sense to make a shot more risky and difficult than it needs to be especially from a ethical standpoint.
Great video and honest analysis! I’ve had great success with NOSLER Partition bullets especially in my 30’06 handloads. At close range these pass through deer but a frontal shot on a Maine buck several years ago did come apart and I had to shoot that buck two more times! Bullet retention was around 55%.
Very good, very illuminating tests. Much appreciated.
An interesting video, I've shot the Nosler's for 20 plus years. It's never let me down so that gets my vote.
Great video....AGAIN, especially highlighting the ricochet risk 🙂
My wife and I have been running copper out here in Montana for a few years now. We’ve tagged three using Hornady’s 139 gr GMX out of their superformance line in the 7mm-08 REM. All have practically dropped in their tracks. Longest shot so far has been 311 yards, and it dropped a nice mule deer in its tracks and left a pretty solid exit wound.
I’ve used all 3 on deer. SST basically exploded and separated. Huge entrance hole and no exit. Nosler worked better but I now use Barnes ttsx or lrx.
Agree. Have same results with all three and have gone to TTSX
If I could give 2 thumbs up, I would! Never seen any other channel take out a metal detector to find the lost bullet! Way to go above and beyond!
What I've become mindful of is the lead shrapnel left behind in my family's meat.
SST in my sons 7-08 at 70 yards on mule deer buck performed flawlessly nice mushroomed bullet on opposite side hide.
Great video! I'm a 7mm Rem Mag user myself and use the SST bullets with zero issues with whitetail here in the states. Just FYI, lol,, you know the letter T actually makes a sound when using it with words! Haha, just picking with ya! My family actually came over from Lanarkshire, What's know known as the Glasgow region of Scottland
haha nice one, i'm an hour from there. whitetail are amazing looking deer. Really hope to get over there one day for a try
That barnes triple shock in a 7mm mag is capable of taking any big game animal we have in north America
Nosler and Barnes have always been my favorite bullets for taking game .
Nosler Partition , and Accubond are no questions asked my favorite .
Barnes TSX and TTSX hit game extremely hard . Nosler E-Tip is on par with TTSX .
Federal Premium TLR Edge and Nosler Accubond Long Range are probably the best longer range game bullets on the planet . I'm not really fan of the Hornady ELDX but I will use 103g ELDX for 6mm. That 103g ELDX does an amazing job taken whitetail deer and Hoggs in the USA .
6mm , 308 and 300 WSM are my 3 favorite cartridges to use for all my hunting needs..
Nice projectile comparison
The thing that stands out is lead fragments,
I will assume that the deer your hunting will be harvested for meat and as such the high lead fragments may ruin a lot of usable meat.
Guessing the Barnes would do a great job if put in correct spot
That said the potential ricochet issue of the Barnes projectile could create problems especially for livestock.
I'm a huge fan of the 7mm's... I own a 7mm Rem Mag, 280AI, and 28 Nosler. Personally I don't like a bullet that breaks apart I want a bullet that expands and retains as much weight as possible so that it'll drive deep through that front shoulder and out the other side. I only shoot the SST's when hunting hogs at night everything else I shoot the Barnes TTSX/LRX, Swift Sirocco 2, Nosler Accubond/ABLR, and Speer Gold Dots. I took a monster bull moose with my 280AI and the 140gr Barnes TTSX at just under 400 yards 3 or 4 years ago and that was the only TTSX bullet I've ever recovered and it only lost 15grs after that I was a believer. I've never tried the 120gr TTSX in any of my 7mm's but now that I've seen this I'm going to that's good performance.
Why did you use the smallest one of your rifles To go on the mouse hunt with Just a question 280AI is great I have one just wondered why
Great video/rewiew. Personally I use SST's in 308. Works every time. It really boils down to shot placement. I think you have more wiggle rom by using SST's ahead of TTSX, but that's me.
As mentioned by you the TTSX need alot of horsepower to work as intended. Maybe it works in the 7RM
Enough of that........thumbs up and greetings from one of your subscribers in Norway 🇳🇴
I used SST exclusively for years, even on weak shots fragments would work magic to bring down the target animals.
I use sst bullets they work great on pigs
Well done. Thank you. Good test & results. Good information. The data, experience & perspective is quite helpful. Any of the 3 would be effective on most medium (whitetail) and some larger(elk/red) game. The fear of grenading doesn't discourage me. The "loss" of mass or low weight retention isn't a "bad" thing. The bullet is doing it's job in the area it needs to the most. Jacket core separation isn't a terrible failure either. Appreciate the spirit of the vid and content. Subscribed.
Barnes X bullets are one of the best hunting bullets ever made if not the absolute best! I like a bullet exiting the far side it leaves a huge blood trail a blind man can trail.
Copper bullet worked well. Petals open and cause initial massive damage, petal shedding causes more damage, then a penetrating slug continues through the tuff stuff. Not a bad way to roll.
I have never had a whitetail move any direction other than straight down with the SST in 25-06. The ballistic tips all ran about 50 feet. Monolithic bullets always ended up with a tracking job .
165 grain nosier ballistic tips are a Whitetails worst nightmare. Never had one take a step.
Great video... Thank you
Nosler Accubond does a great job in all my 30 cals. 300wm 300 wby mag, 308. Never had core separation. When it hits it hits extremely hard! Good clean humane kill. That's the most important thing quick kill.
Great video, thank you. I’m planning on getting a .260 shortly and working up a load for use on deer with the ttsx, personally I wouldn’t want all the lead fragmentation inside the carcass.
I have a 99 Savage I re-barreled to .260 Remington.. I use Remington Corlokt factory ammo. The first deer I shot with it was broadside and there was pieces of lung laying where I hit the deer. It went about 15 yards, flat out to dead. I try to use Corlokt bullets when I reload. Unless you are using a real "barrel burner" there is no need to use anything but cup and core bullets.
@@oldgoat1890 Hmm personally I disagree on that. I use my .308 for Warthogs and Gemsbok - I'd never want to use Core-Lokt on Gemsbok, so I'll leave them out of the equation. My experience with the 180gr Core-Lokt RNSP was a very good group at 100, but the performance on Warthogs was seriously lacking. It worked 'as intended', but even then, I had Warthogs run for up to 30seconds.. compare that to the Hornady Superformance 150gr SST that I used - more often than not, the Warthog would drop in it's tracks to a heart/lung shot and the furthest I've ever seen one run from an SST was about 50m, which is still less than 10 seconds. I've also used them on Gemsbok with great effect.
Now.. bullet choice is everyone's own personal choice, but man.. my experience with Core-Lokt has been very disappointing. Personally, I am now using Nosler AccuBond 165gr. First experience with them was on a Gemsbok - never had one go such a short distance to a Lung shot that also severed the Arteries.
This sounds like a great setup to me. I will say, I used the Hornady Superformance 150gr SST in my .308 for quite a while on Warthogs and Gemsbok down here in Africa. The only SST I ever managed to recover was on a frontal neck shot, with the bullet stopping along the spine. Perfect mushroom, but I did have a separation of the core and jacket. Both were extremely flat as well, but that thing was going over 2800fps on impact. I'm sure any fragments can help with getting an animal down quicker, but I agree with you. The idea of 20gr+ of lead fragments in the carcass is not particularly great. You won't go wrong with Barnes.
Not in to stalking , possible riccocade quite worrying great video
Looks like that Barnes was tumbling as it exited the first container.
Here in Mississippi we have dense cover and prefer pass thru shots for possible blood trailing if necessary. I used both Hornady & Nosler but recently chaneged over to Barnes TSX .excellent performance and on few occasions when shot placement off blood trailing was easy due to pass thru and rapid blood loss
Sweet video bro.! I just subscribed to you!
Good video. Thanks. Personnally, I prefer the Barnes (oe Nosler Partition, or Swift A-Frame, or any of the bonded bullets) because I prefer a bullet that does not leave as many fragments, that will spoil more meat. And I prefer a buller that will pass trough the animal. I don't believe in the "energy dumping" theory. As for the recochet, where I hunt, (in Canada) there are no other hunters close to me...
Try the Barnes TAC-TX. It's all Copper but designed to limit over penetration.
The deer would struggle to tell the difference
I have used Barnes 168 .308 win on elk and they have nearly gone through rest on the far rib cage, only lost one petal at 200yrds. They work as advertised. You really want a hole on both sides of the animal so you get a blood trail. If you was worried about a ricochet from the ground on the other side of your deer you shoulfd not be shooting.
yeah, bigger game that penetration is a big advantage
In my 18 308 i use 165 ttsx getting 2600 fps and 175 lrx in my 300 winmag limited to my 1 in 11 twist in 300. If you have the twist rate 168 barnes lrx works very well
I'm going to try the 139gr Hornady GMX with my 7x64 this coming season.
hope you get a great season, good luck!
@@letshuntdinner Hopefully might get up to Scotland for the 1st time.
I''ll take the Nosler.
really good vid mate im thinking of trying the barnes on roe in the borders at pretty close ranges up to 120yds do you think they would be a good choice? in my .270
110gr or 130gr are both very good and would be my choice if I was switching to lead free
130grain nosler ballistic tip is what you need in your 270! Ur welcome
@@reddawng43x91 I’m happy with the Sierra game kings that I shoot now but it looks like the area where I shoot is going over to lead free
If you like huge wound channels ballistic tips are great and they leave an exit unlike SST's.
Good video Paul. I’m not sure that your representation of weight retention is correct as you should only record the mass of the largest fragment. For the Hornady this may be either the core or the jacket but not both. If you follow through with your logic every bullet would have 100% weight retention as all the tiny fragments should be found and included in the weighing. Can I also ask what velocity each of these bullets were fired at and the range. Thanks
yes, velocity at muzzle is in the video as a subtitle when shooting jut before each shot. The weight retention of the bullets was based on the main bit left over excluding the bits broke off. I counted the core and jacket of the sst because they were together and had done all the hard work before separating right at the end. With the barnes I excluded the petals because they had sheered off
.
Note…….ttsx $1.10 plus per bullet
Nbt .68 cents per bullet
Sst .50 cents per bullet
I like all them bullets I don't think I used a barnes yet I have the ssts and nosler etip copper around them
Sure beats picking out lead fragments all through your meat Barnes is very good for hunting in the USA
TTSX was always my go to bullet in lead free but on smaller deer they just didn't dump energy as well.
SST 150 in .308 is devistating on the vitals of a deer near and far.
Phenomenal, I think 300BO would yield similar results, what’s your opinion?
well, should do ok but the Blackout is a bit slower than most of the .30 cal family. The 125gr SST has a pretty decent velocity in .300 Blackout and should perform well at closer ranges under 100m but is certainly fairly loopy past that!
Curious why you didnt go with a 30-06 or 300wm instead for reloading purpose? You wouldn't of have had to buy more new bullets amd gotten the speed that you wanted.
always loved the 308 as a deer calibre shooting lead core bullets and with a .30 cal already I wanted the 7mm rem mag to shoot lead free because it had much higher muzzle velocity in lighter bullets but then could shoot much heavier options too with much more energy than that 308 overall.
The pe-all peeled off in the wa-err container.
Nosler BT alltheways!
Wee Rab finally worked out how to use a Deus
needed to charge it in the car first!
Haven't watched the vid yet but I'd put a million bucks down that the Barnes has the best weight retention. Lol : )
Did you notice your TTSX had a wonky poly tip? Have you found this affects accuracy??
Their blue tips always look a little iffy but the accuracy is exceptional, always surprised me how good they are on paper
Great video, thank you🙂🙂👍👍+658
Incredibly light bullets for a 7 mag. I expected nothing less than fragmentation. In the states we use heavier. 175gr for my 7 mm and nothing takes a step when shot.
For deer these lighter bullets are a good choice. IMHO
I agree that heavier really is better in the 7MM Rem Mag. I’ve shot many a mulie with this cartridge and two antelope as well. I’ve found 160 partitions or Accubonds work the best. Of course a good 280 Remington is as much as you need for antelope.
140 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip riding atop Reloader 19, is the sweet spot for my Weatherby Vanguard 7mm Rem Mag.
Great video. I love solid copper, but I think you are using too much gun. A moose rifle on a roe deer? 6.5 Grendel, 7mm-08, 243, or my favorite the old 250 Savage is all that is necessary for deer up to 300 lbs. I use an 80 gr TTSX for white tail.
If you compare accuracy, the SST from my experience is the better bullet. Penetration means nothing if you miss your target area.
I honestly imo believe the nosler ballistic tip is the more accurate of the bunch
@@reddawng43x91 I just purchased 170 Nosler BT bullets for my 6.8 Western. Using with H4831sc I had some great groups. These ballistic tip bullets are more deer bullets than for elk or moose. I like the 175 Nosler Accubond as well for accuracy. They are for larger game like elk and moose.
I understand why some places don't allow the use of a lead bullet. At the same time your video shows a major problem with a solid copper bullet. The answer used in the USA is the use of a fully bonded bullet which holds onto the jacket and retains almost 100% of its weight. Where the solid copper bullets retain there weight they lack the expansion of a fully bonded lead bullet. In hunting you want to kill the animal at the spot of impact and not have it run off to die. This is a problem if the bullet doesn't expand well and dump all the energy in the animal. You also made a good point about where that solid copper bullet is going to go after leaving the animal. Nosler makes wonderful fully bonded bullets along with the Gold Dot bullet line produced by Speer. Both of these bullets retain almost 100% of their weight and what is lost will be found inside the animal. I find that in hunting a humane kill should be of the highest importance! Having your game run off after being shot is not humane. I think that the solid bonded bullet is a good middle ground for the environment and the animal. I did enjoy your video and look forward to seeing more of your videos in the future.
Man those tiny deer you guys have. I would be using a 6mm or .243. That 7 with a 120 ttsx let alone a 140. Will absolutely smoke an Elk.
All the bits is why I don't hunt with SST bullets.
I hunt for meat and I enjoy my wild game too much to waste them with grenades like Nosler ballistic tips and SST’s
Thats stupid. SST'S blow up on the ribs and do shattering damage to vitals instantly. They rarely exit. High shoulder? 1/2 lb. of meat from 1 shoulder blade lost.🙏
Looking for gold out near Tyndrum I see.
Your velocities seem a little low for the 7 rem mag. You can easily get 2900 + fps velocity out of the .280 rem with the 140s. Try cranking them up to 3200 - 3300 fps out of your rem mag and I guarantee that you will not want to shoot anything else.
Hoot mon hoot mon yeah yeah yeah
Copper bullet had a lot of over penetration. I would rather the round expand and get stopped by the hide on the other side of my animal.
I prefer a pass through for better blood loss. Drop the velocity on the lead free and it will be perfect.
@@Geekygordon it's going to bleed the same amount no matter if it passes through 100% or passes through 99% and gets stuck in the hide. Only difference is external bleeding or internal but it's still going to bleed the exact same.
The old saying goes too much pass through and you're wasting some bullet effecttiveness the real gunsmith channel has a great opinion on this
Bottom Line, if you like eating micro bits of lead in your meat, use the sst or ballistic tip if you like clean meat use the TTSX you do NOT need a bullet to fragment to kill a deer!!!!!!! you need a bullet that opens and goes through a animal leaving two holes they bleed faster ,better and if you have to track one in the rain you will like the better blood trail those pedals opened up are like a modern Broadhead over imagine the damage to tissue as it spins through a animal bone or no bone... after all we are all just a bag of water drain the water and we are done same with all the critters.
"Yum, that pile of pulverized and powdered lead in the bottom of the jug looked absolutely delicious. I wonder how best to cook it? Anyone have any good recipes for lead?"
Thanks for the vid.
in fairness, if you shot the deer in the head...
@letshuntdinner IMHO, the 120 gr TTSX is to light for 7 mag velocities. They work great in the 7-08. My experience loading these puppies for hunting suggests to load em fast. If you want to slow em down, step up in weight. Or vice-versa if you want to speed em up. Our biggest concern with bullets such as this is their low-speed performance. At what velocity do they turn into a target bullet. We are still working on their maximum hunting range potential, where the breakoff point is.
Id live to have seen a 130grn TTSX to see what it did. I plan using them in my .270
I think the results would be pretty much the same. The bullet should hold the petals a bit better with 130gr being a touch slower.
@@letshuntdinner what velocities were you getting with the 110grn?
@@garethbryson I've shot them up at 3,400 fps at muzzle but backed off and dropped down to 3,150 fps which seemed best for my rifle. Your .270 will sweatly run 110gr Barnes at 3,300 all day but might find slightly slower is smoother.
I run a 95gr ttsx out of my 270 wsm at 3750 FPS. Hits deer like lightning. Drt.
It makes no sense when measuring weight retention to add in some of the bits that separated. The retained weight should be of the heaviest single piece by itself. Cheers!
yes, would do that different next time but thought since they punched out of the first container it was worth including.
130 ttsx out of a 308 is a hammer. I own a 7mag and a 308 amongst others. And the 7 mag sits in the safe most of the time. If you cannot kill it with 130 ttsx or 124 hammer at 3100-3200 fps. You shouldnt be shooting at it in my opinion
I used the Barnes in Africa on several different species of large game. They die quickly and don't go far.
I’ll take the nosler all day ! Hell , if u wanna compare the ttsx then compare it to the nosler accubond! The accubond is the most accurate most penetrating round that actually expands to a mushroom like a cup n core period
Ttbt 150gr barnes coal ?
those are very high speeds for that kind of bullets, that's why they disintegrate... not the right bullet for that magnum load
Well sure, depends on what you're shooting
Try a Nosler Accubond
Good bullets, used a lot but it got hard to get them at a sensible price here
One problem, 3 different conditions for each bullet... You should have 3 sets of jugs! Nice try, but not fair!
You want to bullet to exit that barnes bullet hardly had any energy left and didn't even make it to the backstop.
Nobody in the states uses 7mm, it just blows through everything, it's overkill.
well... the 7mm Remington Magnum is the most bought, shot and hunted-with magnum cartridge. It's always better to have too much than not enough!
Barnes ttsx all day long for me there is no better
I use TTSX projectiles in my 6mm rem, 257 Roberts, 6.5 x 55 swede and all penetrate fully, do a lot of damage. The deer have never moved more that a few meters. TTSX all the way.
This is what's wrong with set and ballistic tip bullets they fragment to easily
I'm sorry, but the Nosler BT and the Hornady SST bullets are terrible hunting choices. Cup and Core design fragment with limited penetration. I've used them on whitetails, mule deer, elk, wild boar and predators. The lack of penetration, much less pass through, fails to leave blood letting wounds that allow for easy tracking. Accubond, Interlock and Partition bullets provide far superior terminal performance.
Well, if you're reloading them and drive them too fast then they break up as with pretty much every standard jacketed lead core bullet. I have shot with SST and BT as a deer control contractor with over a thousand deer taken using these options and when they are shot in factory loads or optimum velocity reloads they are exceptional. I've certainly shot a lot of red deer which are mule deer size without any concerns regarding bullet performance. The sst and bt didn't break up in the test both with around 60% weight retention shot at 7mm rem mag velocity. That's is pretty much my experience on deer.
We dont care about total weight found. We want the most weight retention in one projectile.
weight retention isn't a good thing on medium game, sure if you're shooting elephant or buff in the head then you want tough bullets with deep penetration but for chest shooting deer you need a bullet that delivers energy with good organ damage resulting in fast bleed outs so shorter runs
@@letshuntdinner false
@@workct4102 please feel free to create content and put forward your findings after testing, I look forward to it.
@@letshuntdinner I used to all the time. And the ignorant refuse to acknowledge...so I just throw my $.02 when I can and usually the ones with any sort of common sense and logic walk away with knowledge.
@@workct4102 time to start again perhaps
A good ole PowerPoint or Core-Lokt will perform better than all of these
well, the winchester and remington options you mention are fine but certainly not better if you want to shoot reliable budget soft point bullets but if you put them on target against the ones mentioned in the video with a bit of distance you can see why those premium bullets cost that little bit extra.
@@letshuntdinner you obviously haven't hunted long...or at least dont understand which bullets do what, how, and why.
@@workct4102 after thousands of deer shot professionally I can say with certainty that while the options you suggest work fine and I've used both over the years they wouldn't be in my top 5 picks. There's nothing special about their design or performance that makes them stand out. At the end of the day they're both budget ammo choices.
@@letshuntdinner spending $$$ on bullets doesn't make them magic
@@letshuntdinner it's just sad that over "thousands" of deer shot you cant see the difference nor bothered to even try
Wow 😲 y'all get to have firearms .. in Scotland.... I thought England don't let foke have firearms???
You can get hunting and target shooting firearms but the application process can take 6 months.
In watching your video I can't help but notice your velocities are way down on that 7MM Mag for those weight of bullets. You should be doing over 200fps faster than your showing. What powders are you using and what grain charges for each bullet. I've been a Ballastician for over 50+ years. I have developed many many rounds and powder combinations of several dozen caliber rifles and hand guns in that time frame. I know what works and what doesn't especially for the 7MM Mag.
Yeah, it was light starter charges of ramshot hunter only 56gr and 58gr I think but shows in the vid I think