Developing Kodak Tri-X 400 120 with D76 Stock || Developing with Nico

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 95

  • @NicosPhotographyShow
    @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety +8

    Sorry for the bad audio, we didnt realize audio was not as it should. Wont happen again.

  • @1accon
    @1accon Před 4 měsíci +2

    I first followed this video to develop HP5+ in 2020, referred to it several times. Now again in 2024 I am developing and I come back to the same video. It's really helpful - deep thanks to you Nico and your team.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 měsíci

      This is why I made this video!! Want to try and get back to more simple but helpful tutorials.

  • @cathywaite844
    @cathywaite844 Před 2 lety +2

    thanks for making this video, i havent developed since i was at art college, but your video was very easy to understand. thanks for all your time and effort. i will have a go today

  • @richardsimms251
    @richardsimms251 Před rokem +1

    This is truly a useful video. I plan to develop TRI-X soon. Thank you so much. RS. Canada

  • @stephendeakin2714
    @stephendeakin2714 Před 4 lety +1

    Really appreciate your videos, not everyone has a teacher to show them in real time the process. I use Ilford DD-X three inversions per minute, Delta film Ilford say needs longer to fix than HP 5 so for simplicity I fix all films for five minutes and do the same wash method as you demonstrated, always adding an extra change of water, just like you.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      Thanks Stephen. Yeah, T grain film need more washing. I usually fix for 6 minutes all films. But wanted to be as close to the book on this series of videos.

  • @wilbmoore
    @wilbmoore Před 10 měsíci

    Nicole thank you for going through the whole process and not speeding up. 🙏🏾

  • @toomasrett3931
    @toomasrett3931 Před 3 lety +2

    Thank you. Its been a while for me.

  • @1973sonvis
    @1973sonvis Před 4 lety +3

    Great video! In my opinion you might agitate to hard and too many times. I would give two more gentle inversions every 30 secs, or else you risk overdeveloping - especially when using stock dilution. That’s what I used to belive, but I see your method is working. I use the standard developers: D76, HC-110 and Rodinal and find them good and economical. I mostly use Tri-X, HP5+ or Acros 100 films. Keep up the good work, Nico! 😊👍🏻

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo Před 4 lety

      Bernt Sønvisen he said he was following an instruction sheet at the beginning from Kodak.

  • @iNerdier
    @iNerdier Před 4 lety +2

    Man I want one of those clocks, they're such '70s elegance

  • @talyellin
    @talyellin Před 2 lety

    helpful video, thanks

  • @wilbmoore
    @wilbmoore Před 10 měsíci

    Can you done video using the monobath from cinestill? Really would appreciate it.

  • @pritush
    @pritush Před 4 lety +1

    I have told myself I will not use anything except D76 ever in my life 😆 👏 🙏

  • @nickfanzo
    @nickfanzo Před 4 lety +1

    These are great videos

  • @papertiger982
    @papertiger982 Před 2 lety +1

    Who did you suggest to watch for more high agitation development, top something?

  • @lucasbarnstead8843
    @lucasbarnstead8843 Před 3 lety +2

    on massive dev chart and on my d76 bag, it says for kodak tri-x 400 to develop for 6.75 minutes, what’s different about this film?

    • @dfhdasfj
      @dfhdasfj Před rokem

      An answer to this would be pretty interesting! We also struggle why he talks about 8min.

  • @GigiDAmico
    @GigiDAmico Před 2 lety

    are you talking about Kodak HC 110 as alternative for more contrast?

  • @jaewalken
    @jaewalken Před 2 lety +1

    Who is the guy you mentioned that develop his film with deep contrast?

  • @ViaOjo
    @ViaOjo Před 2 lety

    Am I correct in thinking that one liter will develop four rolls of film?

  • @cristobalmoreno3824
    @cristobalmoreno3824 Před 4 lety +1

    thanks very much!! do you let the negatives completely air dry, or do you use a squeegee before letting it dry?

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      I always air dry, no squeegee for me as I have scratched the emulsion before.

  • @hugoalvarado8697
    @hugoalvarado8697 Před 4 lety

    Hey Nico, I recently tried developing Rollei RPX 400 in Rollei RPX dev but I am finding it to be very grainy and harsh looking. I am following the recommended agitation scheme and times. I would very like you to try that combo and see your results. Thank you.

  • @valerio96uch
    @valerio96uch Před rokem

    I use standard paterson tank for 2 35mm rolls, so I should use 300ml of product for just 1 roll of 35mm film, If I use a 1L solution of D 76 does it mean that I'm allowed to develop just 3 rolls (and also that I will have 100ml of leftover develop)?

  • @TheRandomGamezz
    @TheRandomGamezz Před 2 lety

    I've heard that you don't need the stop, that you can just wash it of with water and go directly to fixer. Is this a good way of doing it if i dont have any stop?

  • @skssks6745
    @skssks6745 Před 2 lety

    I can’t find the PDF that you attached below.

  • @annadenaro9919
    @annadenaro9919 Před 3 lety +1

    Did you make the video on making a gallon?

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 3 lety

      I have to make it. Covid hit and lost my assistant (cant come to the studio).

  • @wilbmoore
    @wilbmoore Před 10 měsíci

    Do those chemicals come in some sort of kit or do you buy them separately only?

    • @randallstewart1224
      @randallstewart1224 Před 9 měsíci +1

      Ilford sells a kit which includes a developer, stop bath and fixer. Its target purchaser is a small volume user just trying B&W DIY photo processing. Its downside is that it is relatively expensive for the small amount of product included. Ilford calls this kit "Simplicity".

    • @wilbmoore
      @wilbmoore Před 9 měsíci

      ​@@randallstewart1224Thanks. I've actually used it. Love it its just pricey.

  • @mikethomas1073
    @mikethomas1073 Před 3 lety +1

    Very informative, thank you. So do I understand correctly, If I load my 120 film into my 220 back of my Pentax 645 I'll get 17 shots instead of 15?

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 3 lety

      Thanks Mike! Yeah, I load it a tad less (the arrow not aligned to the indication) and get almost 18 shots...

    • @mikethomas1073
      @mikethomas1073 Před 3 lety +1

      @@NicosPhotographyShow Very cool! I'll try it on my next shoot. Thank you.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 3 lety +1

      Do remember that the 17 and 18 are bonis! So dont take the most important shots there. After 18 i just fire away until the film sounds likes its spooled on the other side.

    • @andyvan5692
      @andyvan5692 Před 2 lety

      I wouldn't reccomend that, (120 into a 220 insert); 220 has NO backing paper, 120 HAS backing paper, so the film plate COULD jam the film, or worst case fly the film free, therefore allowing it to bow slightly, affecting the focal point of the image, as the mirror/etc. is calibrated on this theory, that the focus plane(film plane) is a constant distance from the rear lens of the camera, so EVERY photo's focus could NOT be guaranteed.

  • @nickfanzo
    @nickfanzo Před 4 lety +1

    Do rodinal next

  • @seemantadutta
    @seemantadutta Před 4 lety +1

    I am yet to try D-76 and after watching this video I am sold. What dilution do you recommend ? 1:1 ?

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety +1

      Yeah, 1:1 is a good compromise.

    • @randallstewart1224
      @randallstewart1224 Před 9 měsíci

      D-76 is commonly used as a stock solution, 1:1, or 1:2, adjusting development time to accommodate for the extent of dilution. Generally speaking, the longer dilution will give a slightly faster film speed, better sharpness, and finer grain, however these differences are quite small and hard to observe without careful analysis. Diluted working solutions should be used only once, then discarded. This gives you a far more consistent processing, but may also give fewer rolls processed for a given amount of developer. For the years I used D-76, I favored the 1:2 dilution. For its reliable consistency, I always prefer one-shot usage over multiple reuse of stock developer, or even worse, stock developer with replenishment.

  • @agespin
    @agespin Před 3 lety

    Nicos I need your help, I just mix up a pack of D76 and the mix came out brown is the good to use, or is it not good?

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 3 lety

      I have heard Kodak having the brown issue, but aslo heard it wont be a big issue. At least they said that on the Dektol.

  • @peter-8483
    @peter-8483 Před 3 lety +1

    I think I’ll send my film to get developed, seems rather easy to screw up.
    Great video though, I never knew how involved this stuff was, I always wondered about it since my grand father had a dark room

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 3 lety +1

      Thanks! It's a lot to do but fairly simple after you try it a few times.

  • @darcieellson9423
    @darcieellson9423 Před 2 lety

    Can I develop Ilford with this D76? What are the measurements for 1 roll?

    • @randallstewart1224
      @randallstewart1224 Před 9 měsíci

      If you mean, can you develop Ilford film in Kodak D-76 developer, the answer is sure you can. In fact, Ilford sells a developer, ID-11, which is the same formula as D-76. Some developers may have particular effects on a specific film which are deemed good or bad, but that has nothing to do with who makes the developer.

  • @hariseldon1977
    @hariseldon1977 Před 3 lety +1

    D-76 is not so easy to find. And so for the time chart Pdf From Kodak. have you some advice on that? Thanks. great video

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 3 lety +1

      Kodak has been having issues with chemical supplies as of late. I would suggest trying some Adox or Ilford if you can access them.

    • @hariseldon1977
      @hariseldon1977 Před 3 lety

      @@NicosPhotographyShow Thanks

  • @toulcaz31
    @toulcaz31 Před 4 lety +1

    Not your usual sound quality, not sure what happened...

  • @VonBromPhoto
    @VonBromPhoto Před 4 lety +1

    Why did you agitate for the first minute? Kodak doesn't recommend that.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      I have always done so. Will check the pdf but I dont recall seeing it mentioned.

    • @charlesclovis4189
      @charlesclovis4189 Před 4 lety

      @@NicosPhotographyShow I believe that it's 30 seconds for the first agitation. You neg seems to be contrasty, there is not too much information on it.

  • @mamiyapress
    @mamiyapress Před 4 lety +1

    Good but I would use a pre-wash for one minute, a Speed Wash and a Chamois to wipe the film before hanging it up, never, ever use your fingers.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety +1

      I only prewash with my Jobo, not usually during hand inversions. Also the fingers has been fine with me before. I rather fingers than the normal film squeegee, but a Chamois is a good idea.

    • @mamiyapress
      @mamiyapress Před 4 lety +1

      @@NicosPhotographyShow I just recommended you and your videos, especially this one to a Film Developing group that I am on, on Facebook.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      @@mamiyapress thank you!

    • @john_murch
      @john_murch Před 2 lety

      @@NicosPhotographyShow Hey Nico, my friend is a pro photographer, he did it the same way as you for decades. He always told me to use the fingers not a squeegee to avoid scratching the film. I will go with your way and my friend's way...:)

  • @analogclub2834
    @analogclub2834 Před 4 lety +1

    Using the developer (D76) with this film is like wearing the most luxurious suit and the shoe is a bathroom slippers.
    Failed experiment with choice

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      Why would you say that? D76 has been the most popular developer for decades.

    • @analogclub2834
      @analogclub2834 Před 4 lety

      @@NicosPhotographyShow Yes, it was the most popular in the past, when the price of a roll was a quarter of a euro, and there were companies
      ORWO - SVEMA- Tesma - Forte _ Efek - Tudor -
      These companies used to make inexpensive films, and the D76 spread is not because of its quality, but because it is cheap and easy to make.
      If you are buying a movie for a quarter of a dollar, you have to develop $ 0.1, which is a popular reason (D76).
      It is a developer without feelings.
      Why not try FX-10, Calbi-49, Kalgon or Agfa.14?

    • @analogclub2834
      @analogclub2834 Před 4 lety +1

      @@NicosPhotographyShow
      After the period of medical isolation that the world is going through ends, I can send you a number of developers that you have not heard about before and you will be able to provide valuable and meaningful videos,
      The problem is that you send me who receives this photochemistry in Egypt. I really don't know!
      I also have the process (Agfa Scala) that converts the negative film into positive transparency (black and white).
      I have great experiences and developers while wasting your time on experiment (D76). !
      What are you doing, my dear brother?
      I am preparing photochemistry from scratch and selling it at a symbolic price to Egyptian hobbyists, and I have been able to break the taboos that were previously sacred and from them (D76) this lie has been shattered, Egyptian amateurs are now talking about Agfa 14 and Agfa 11 and many wonderful formulas Another great thing that I told you about earlier.

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo Před 4 lety +2

      Why are you being pretentious? The fact that he is even making these videos for people who need to learn, is a god send.
      Where are your live instructional videos, oh wise one?

  • @jdebultra
    @jdebultra Před 4 lety +1

    Too much agitation...

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      What do you suggest?

    • @jdebultra
      @jdebultra Před 4 lety +1

      @@NicosPhotographyShow don't over agitate

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety

      @@jdebultra never noticed issues with my prints due to my developing. But I guess you think differently, and thats ok.

    • @jdebultra
      @jdebultra Před 4 lety +1

      @@NicosPhotographyShow well you replied starting out about grain.... ok you are like all the other youtubers..

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  Před 4 lety +1

      @@jdebultra where did I mention grain? I like the tonality and contrast I get to be honest. I dont mind being like others, you seem to use it as if it was bad. Also let me tell you I enjoy all comments, just wish you could elaborate instead of repeating the use of...