RANKING EVERY BIG BROTHER 1ST PLACE GAME
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 03. 2024
- 24. Jag (Season 25)
23. Rachel (Season 13)
22. Dick (Season 8)
21. Jordan (Season 11)
20. Josh (Season 19)
19. Ian (Season 14)
18. Lisa (Season 3)
17. Adam (Season 9)
16. Steve (Season 17)
15. Taylor (Season 24)
14. Maggie (Season 6)
13. Kaycee (Season 20)
12. Michie (Season 21)
11. Xavier (Season 23)
10. Nicole F (Season 18)
9. Will (Season 2)
8. Boogie (Season 7)
7. Jun (Season 4)
6. Drew (Season 5)
5. Andy (Season 15)
4. Hayden (Season 12)
3. Cody (Season 22)
2. Derrick (Season 16)
1. Dan (Season 10)
Andy should be higher than Hayden and Cody
Jun being an deserving winner that she is
I don't know why it never crossed me that Jun is the best female winner until now. Her game is so flawless and textbook. The best floater we've ever seen on Big Brother.
Nahhh Jag is not the worst, he is defentiley better than Dick and Rachel. Probably better than Ian too tbh
Note: This is based on Will's BB2 game not his BB7 game. This is why Will is not in the top 5
He won bb2 what do you mean?
@@Fitzbits687 I meant not based on his BB7 game. Will was better in all stars than his winning season
@@whats_holden_up ah ok sorry I was confused but yeah bb7 is his better game
Lisa before Adam is actually crazy
Are you still planning to post about big brother know that your done the ranking ( like maybe you could do each season and rank the players ) just a suggestion
I can do that for sure
What's holding up in 2068 ranking every 0th place game
ranking andy and derrick in top 5 and taylor and nicole not even seeing top 5 is FOUL (considering nicole has won twice, even if the way she played the game most people dislike it- game respects game)
it’s winning games not winning players
Bro Taylor should not even be close to top 5. She is good where she is
@@sadboy4today187 Taylor should be even lower.
Nicole needs to be rated as a better winner she dominated that game and avoided the block for over 90 days and had all of the guys besides Jozea running back to help do her dirty work. How she maneuvered the final 7 (2 rounds) to have all the other groups take shots at each other while she played the middle between them all guaranteed her to make finale night. Taylor needs to be lower due to abysmal HOH reigns with wrong person leaving, putting herself in worse spot after an hoh. One that fractured her alliance all for London trip. After Taylor was lucky she wasn't in Dyre fest outside with Terrance, her needing twists to break her way, canceled eviction, afterparty and Turner confirming she was the target to leave at final 8 after the veto before Michael’s ouster cancel shenagians Monday midday. Taylor Stayed multiple times that were out of her control why she needs to be lower.
You ever thought about podcasting?
Thought of it but never did it, it could be really cool to do
Lisa wasn’t the right winner but she wasn’t a bad winner
You are obviously only putting Jag last since he was voted out, as besides that no way was his game play the worst of all winners, but by that logic you should be putting Cliff last as he was the only 4th place finisher to be voted out. Be consistent.
First of all, Jag got evicted and his game was straight trash first go around. Cliff got evicted despite not doing much wrong, he only got out since people didn't like Nick. Also Jags made poor decisions in continuously keeping Matt and even when Jag returns he plays the very next week poorly. Jags winning game is atrocious, I had Cliff low but Cliff was only evicted for something he didn't do
@@whats_holden_up LOL your excuses for Cliff's eviction are pointless, fact is he was evicted. It is easy to say Jag only got evicted since Cameron hated him at that point which was obviously true, no difference. And Jag didn't do anything as incredibly stupid as Cliff voting out Tommy. In fact he played the end game pretty much perfectly, while Cliff did virtually nothing right in the end game.
@@frankiedelgadoes yes but again we are comparing Jag to other winners and Cliff to other 4th place players. The pool of winners are better players. If Cliff played his game against the winners and won then he'd probably be last as well. Jag brought Matt to the end thinking he'd lose. Not saying Jag was all bad but compared to winners he's definitely near the bottom. Cliff is better than a couple of the 4th place players
@@whats_holden_upYeah, but honestly Jag is definitely better than dick. He's near the bottom, but not the worst. Dick was pretty much going to get voted out anyway if not for a twist, same as jag. This was with his daughter in the game to help him as well. At least jag played a very good endgame, active in his work to improve and play a better game, while dick was just carried to the end by the game. Also him keeping Matt does not detract from his game IMO as it is a personal move and he knew that it wasn't the best choice for his game, so he had the skill to know that, making his decision not necessarily detract from his skill at the game, as it is basically him trying not to win in a cheap way.
@@whats_holden_up At the very least Jag is way better than Dick. The only argument in his favor is he wasn't voted out, but that isn't even good when he is voted out at Final 9 100% for sure without Americas Player.
Jag is not the worst winner. This list is biased.
Why is Jag last?
He was already evicted
Maybe because he was Evicted then came back and nearly got evicted the next week. Then brought Matt to final 2 thinking he would lose
@@whats_holden_up He still won tho, at the end of the day
@@redpandayt8758by winning comps pretty much the entire game
@@nooby2907 Like no one else has done that before. Stfu
love her but taylor should be a lot lower.
Why did Nicole f won
Because Paul lost... thats literally it, bitter ass jury
@@josephdelgado413 Paul backdooring Davonne and evicting James for Nicole is enough to start why Nicole won. Nicole was never in danger avoiding the block for over 90 days while Paul was on the block 6 times including the first three weeks getting his closest Allies Jozea, Bronte, victor and his ally Victor had unprecedented 3 times to play taking bullets for Paul, with Nicole wanting Victor out every time Paul would run back to Nicole and help do her dirty work. And Paul Being Nicoles pawn to get rid of Michelle and have the boys take a non threat in natalie out after it was Nicole Convincing Natalie and James and Michelle to take out the boys. Showed Nicole could flip the house being down 5-2 and have all the other sides go after each other. In Big Brother 18, from both rounds of the final 7 until finale Nicole adeptly straddled the line between working two other groups and effectively managed her endgame.
Maggie is too low and Will is too high
DREW LOL
I find Xavier to be extremely overrated.
Even without cookout, he would most likely still win that season, he has a great social game that pretty much befriends everybody in the house, AND he has the competition skill to make the homestretch. Just overall a great big brother player.
@sunnygolightly9996 he would NOT have won that season without the cookout. People were targeting multiple times, and the cookout helped them target other people. If the cookout didn't exist Kyland Tiffany or Derek X would have won. Definitely not Xavier
I think people like Claire and Hannah also had a very good chance to win if the cookout didn't exist but yeah, Xavier is proubly evicted in the early Jury phase@@juanwashington-cruz2294
I think this is somewhat true, though I think it's more because the others in BB 23 are not game savvy. Xavier capitalises a lot from other players' messy gameplay
Josh should be at the bottom
Josh might be one of the bottom winners but you gotta give credit where credit is due. He owned his game via goodbye messages and exposed Paul in the finale plea. I still would have voted for Paul regardless but I'm happy for Josh though
Facts!
Dan is the GOAT