When You Win the POWER Position! Risk Meta Settings
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- Risk CZcams ► / thekillpetestrategy
Twitch ► / thekillpetestrategy
Discord ► / discord
Instagram ► / thekillpetestrategy
TikTok ► / thekillpetestrategy
Patreon ► / thekillpetestrategy
For Business & Sponsorship Inquires Email: thekpsmgmt@gmail.com
Fan Mail: PO Box 87537 300 John St. Thornhill ON Canada L3T 7R4
I am so grateful for your time, attention, support and kindness!
Donations are never expected and always appreciated. Thank you!
#Risk #RiskStrategy #RiskGlobalDomination #boardgames
Pete not understanding a beginner is just a novice who has played 2-3 games 😂😂😂😂😂
I was ranked expert/master but you lose your rank if you dont play. I logged in the other day and even I’m a novice now lol
Beginners probably have the widest variation in skill. Some of them are novices that got a tad lucky in their first game, some are about to intermediates or experts within a few days/weeks.
@@ItsThatVoguethe ranks reset every season
I see enough experts/intermediates and the occasional master that plays like a noob. It isn't that hard to rank up to Master. I should know, as I'm at Master Rank, and I still make silly mistakes that can make me look very much like a noob.
@@gheald5245 Honestly I just view the ranks as a measure of stubbornness, they need to nerf the fuck out of the rank points you get from coming 2nd 3rd and 4th it rewards people to much for doing nothing but sit on there asses all game
"Reality is describable" Quantum Physics: "hold my beer"
I use these videos as a sort of Pete Noise to fall asleep to, his voice is like rain on glass
Especially the parts where Pete makes fart noises about Red's cap choice 😂
EUROPEEEE ADVANCEDDDDD PROGRESSIVE CAPITALSSSS
And screeches…
I swear some people try to “hide” their caps. That’s got to be the only rational explanation for these Iceland caps.
I agree that this is their reason, but when you start generating 7 on the second turn, it's pretty obvious where your cap is located!
I look forward to Europe Progressive intros every freaking time😂
20:02 😂😂😂
"so gracelessly"
poor guy
Surprised this didn’t go on the main channel. Good game 👍🏽
Same! But not a bad strat to keep us hooked on the second channel when we get matches like this here too :)
I just shot it last night for funzies. Very happy with how it turned out
the actual fact that pete is a vindictive psycho on the board, with high level gaming skills furthermore paired with his expierience of both physical labour and a degree in philosophie is just such a exotic explosive mix!
Much love Peteman ❤
😻😻😻
It's so fun to watch you call the plays ahead of time. Very cool to see how one of the best thinks
it would have been funny if pete ran out of time xd
No man, that would be devastating! 😢
Punished for my attempt to be a good sport
Really fun one to watch! But I sometimes feel like Pete waits just a hair too long to make some of the moves he wants to make and it ends up costing him. Almost like a missed chance at being opportunistic due to either being a bit too cautious or a bit too greedy (depending on the situation). Green kill is a good example: Could have killed green when he was on 4 cards whilst collecting his own 4th card, resulting in setting in twice. But that delay allowed white to collect the kill and 5 essentially free cards.
I often struggle with the same thing. Do I act early on what is probably a 'good' move, or do I wait one more turn when I'm pretty sure that good move will actually be a GREAT move?
At 37:20, we see a type of defense in depth that I have never tried before (at least in Risk). It works well in heavier simulations/heavier wargames, so I don't know why I was never clever enough to try it in Risk.
This is one of your finest games, especially the end! Very entertaining gameplay and philosophy discussions. Happy Easter🎉 from Australia
Pink got both Purple and White kills and thought he could get in and shrink you but ran into to your surprise 70 stack like well shit lol. Great game killed him just as turn time was running out that was fun to watch.
100k! So cool. I've been watching almost every day since the big 1M+ video. Love your playing style, your conversations and your positive vibes. THANK YOU for giving me (and many of us) our favorite content on youtube. You're awesome
HOLY SH!T Pete just made me realize I have been playing EUROPE ADVANCED PROGRESSIVE CAPITALS my entire life 😂😂
Hug from Lisbon ❤️
You must be quite advanced!
When Pete gets into the philosophy talk his videos kind of remind me of those shorts that give good information but have like Minecraft going on in to background to entertain the lizard brain.
A couple of notes: I enjoy watching you play and also enjoy your thoughts on Philosophy. As stated in a comment on a previous video, that is my major, along with Physics.
Regarding your fallacy of argument from authority, the way I understand it, is that its only a fallacy if its an unqualified authority, or if you are using it deductively or conclusively.
If instead you are using it as an inductive argument, or merely as evidence, then its not a fallacy as long as its a relevant source.
An example of it as a fallacy would be: The government says X is perfectly safe, so therefore it wrong to believe otherwise. OR My Pastor says all the scientists are wrong about the age of the Earth, and we should trust him over all the godless scientists.
An example of it not being a fallacy: Most Astronomers claim the Sun on average is 93 million miles away from Earth, therefore it we should take that claim very seriously. OR The FDA says we shouldn't eat lead paint, so maybe we shouldn't be so confident that its safe.
Appeal to authority is useful when its a highly specialized claim and the 'authority' is one or more highly qualified experts in a related field. Absent contrary evidence, its a compelling piece of evidence. It doesn't mean something is true beyond doubt, but it does mean there is extra credibility to the claim.
So its not a fallacy if someone uses your testimony as evidence that certain dice mechanics in the game are broken. Its not so compelling that we shouldn't dare question it, but it should be compelling enough to lend credibility to the claim. Claims from qualified authority is evidence, just not comprehensive and indisputable proof.
Unfortunately, in today's world, the common counter argument to qualified authority sources is to claim conspiracies. Conspiracies aren't inherently bad arguments, but they are bad arguments if they are used to dismiss valid sources with little to no credible evidence to justify such dismissals. Also, they are irrational if they require highly improbable implications, like claiming nearly all climate scientists, world governments, weather organizations, and climate science organizations are purposefully lying about global warming.
Of course nobody is “lying” about climate change. That’s not at all necessary in order to be skeptical of dogmatic institutional scientific “consensus.” If you recall some of the blatantly false claims about COVID, stated as absolute truths, perhaps this rings a bell. Once claims are beyond question and any doubt is subject to massive social and financial repercussions, one thing IS for certain - we are no longer in the land of science.
That was epic! On the topic of if we are real, I have no idea if we are or not... nobody can know! However, the only important thing is that you believe that your actions have consequences, and if you do anything, that will have some result, be it good or bad. In the end, it doesnt matter, and just live your life, since YOU can't change anything either way 😂
I found this video fun and entertaining, and a little bit educational and informative.
The question is not whether reality is describable, but whether the description is reality, is truth. Reality is "describable" certainly in the sense that you are currently describing it, as am I here. But what kind of truth is described in that description? "I think, therefore I am" is another presupposition. Isn't it possible that you as a singular entity is just as fallacious as assuming that an apple is other than a massive collection of atomic probabilities? If that apple could think, would it make it anymore more singular? And if those thoughts themselves, on the plane of thoughtspace, too were associations of lesser thoughts and experiences and inferences, could you say that they are other than singular? Just because I move, does not mean I have legs. Just because I think, then, may not be hard proof of my self as a singular and cohesive consciousness, some magical construct with the ability to defy physics through some equally magical construct of choice.
Edit: never mind, I love your entire answer here.
Love the game! I gotta say too, im a big fan of seeing wins also on freepete!
I loved this game! I just shot it on a whim last night and wanted to put it up
Dude, why wasn't this game on on your main channel? It was a great game. It had a gambit and everything.
00:27 ok, did not expect that, but loved it even more because of it lol
The winning move in this game seemed to be the cap choice. Of course, there was plenty of luck and skill in other parts of the game but that cap choice was the real defining detail.
And as far as "cogito ergo sum" goes, I have to ask: what is thinking, what is "I", and why can I say "therefore" and imagine it actually means anything?
A little less fundamental of a concept than it might seem.
you got me in the first 30 seconds
If white knew you were a Grandmaster he might have thrown more at you and held you to Italy
What settings do you switch to show the "number of troops" each player gets when their turn starts.
What a Game man , Pete you the Man ...Dammm
Great video really made me happy
Glad you enjoyed it
Lol I thought it was champ (risk4ever) in iceland. He just dropped a video o fhim taking Iceland nw as a challenge
Haha! But if Champ did it he would have won
That intro xD
I never realized I'm living Europe advanced progressive Capitals
I feel like in this situation I never have "red" just bot out... Instead they hang around and slam my cap 3 times before quitting...
Great game 🤘🏻
Best intro yet 😂
Great game pete
a banger
Is a 75% winrate a decent winrate among players who know what their doing?
Very decent
Pink is very in a hurry 😅😅😂😂😂❤❤
20:27 « shout out »? more like shit out 😂
Poop
Fun game!
That was one of the best games yet, awesome position!!
Can you plz share the noobs. Every game I get in has at least 1 master or better.
Dude! I even filtered out novices
"one two, three four five...six seven eight..." sir your territory count is on the right🦊
I'm counting the bonus generation
@@FreePete don['t lie to me you counted all the way up to 30 which was exactly your territory count NOW who's drunk
@@ares_thefox6362 I was pretty drunk last night
Do we just presuppose that reality is describable, or do we know it is given that we use things like mathematics and physics to describe and predict reality?
Pete!
How do you draw on your screen
Screen marker and recorder app
of corse reality isnt describable. since reality include all acts of decribing somthing but include more. so you can never describe it all. the is the math proof if you need one. another proof is the decribing use words. but babies dont know words but still experience reality. and regardless for sure there are no words to decribe everything. anyway gg.
Spoiler Blockers!
It’s funny to think that some of these players could be in elementary school and they’re getting shit on by a middle aged man. I still love you Pete but when you think of it that way you hope that they don’t see this vid lol
1944
1305
first (hahahahahahhahah im so cool) (plz help me)
Don't worry, you matter. Unless you multiply yourself with lightspeed squared. Then you energy.
Have an awesome day!
@@IIIAnchaniUnless he's like a Church on Good Friday, 0mg 🙄
111th like
Love your content but in this game you had more luck than skill.