How vaccines train the immune system in ways no one expected | Christine Stabell Benn | TEDxAarhus
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
- Vaccines do much more than protect against the disease they are designed for. Watch this talk from TEDxAarhus 2018 by medical doctor and professor in global health Christine Stabell Benn and learn how hundreds of thousands of lives could be saved every year just by using the existing vaccines smarter. Christine Stabell Benn is a medical doctor and professor in global health. By studying real-life effects of vaccines in Africa, she has found that vaccines do much more than protect against the target disease; they have so-called non-specific effects. In most cases, they come with an added bonus of increased resistance against other infections than the target disease. If we take that into account, we can save hundreds of thousands of lives every year just by using the existing vaccines smarter. Christine argues that we should not only study vaccines' effects on the target infection, but also ask the often ignored question: what is the impact of vaccines on overall health? This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx
Anyone else seeing a disturbing amount of injuries right now in their social circles?
If you’re really concerned with mortality rates worldwide, bring in clean water. Diseases naturally go away with clean water, clean sanitation practices, & heathy food. It’s happened over & over throughout history. Even leaders of these countries have kicked out vaccine campaigns & begged for clean water. But it’s hard to profit off that so I understand your conflict.
So right! Go back to the causes of the problem rather than giving expensive medications. I guess the drug companies wouldn't make money though...
Truth!
But Pharma can't make money providing clean water, refrigeration, and better nutrition.
I have no doubt that those things are great at aiding in the combat of disease. I feel like those things are essential as well as vaccines. But I think I'm reading that you are confident that that is a better option? Clean water, sani products, and quality food is more successful at eradicating disease than vaccines? I am always trying to know what is true and if you are confident in your claim I am interested! Personally I haven't seen reliable sources saying that but if you have them....HOOK IT UP! That's a bold claim and I'd love to see what helped you be confident in those beliefs!
Japan got rid of the harmfull vaccine in the 80s and did you see where that got them!! HIGHEST LIFE EXPECTENCY IN THE WORLD!
“Vaccines have never been tested for overall health” thank you for this. Baby girls in Guinée boisseau who were vaccinated with the DTP were twice as likely to die from infection than the non vaccinated ones.
Well said...This person can say or do anything for money.. Vaccines are nonsense. God gives us immune system
I don't know anyone with Polio so I'm going to say that just because a non desirable outcome happened with any other vaccine doesn't mean they are all bad. And as tech improves they get safer and safer.
@@johnandersons aha MRNS ?????????????????? yes this very good 😡
@@johnandersons The point of the talk isn't that the DTP doesn't work to prevent the disease but that they were just more likely to die of infections from non-specific effects of vaccination.
@@amg2598 Yes, the operation was a complete success, however the patient didn’t make it. 😂
Mandates, coercion, and threats must be taken off the table as the first step.
Nah. Dumbasses anti-vaxxers causing epidemics that should be taken off the table as the first step, cause they are endangering other people's lives.
Rafael Dugatto can you please follow the proposed schedule for vaccines but do me this favor and UP THE DOSAGE in proportion to your weight. Please do it and film it.
@@rafaeldugatto so you're saying that your vaccines don't work unless i have been vaccinated? right,.. got it!
and you are dumber than a box of rocks, 🤣🤣🤣
be careful, people. vaccines cause sheeple brain damage! YIKES!!!
Rafael Dugatto For people like you it’s because we are in the situation we are today!!!
@@binkydamauler Some people cannot, for various reasons, be vaccinated and rely entirely on herd immunity to keep them safe. And even among those who have been vaccinated, the vaccine is not always 100% effective, typically because people haven't gotten the booster shots.
You gotta see Suzanne Humphries MD, internal medicine, nephrologist and Sherri Tenpenny MD discuss vaccines on you tube. Also, if you haven't see Stephanie Sennef PHD at MIT lecture on glyphosate in vaccines and Theresa Deischer PHD discuss how vaccines are likely to be the cause of increased rates of cancer in children, please do it.
Why ? Humphries is a homeoquack. Tenpenny is an osteoquack, Seneff isn't even close to being a medical doctor. These three are grubby anti vaxers who would roll their own grandmothers for a dollar. A person would have to be beyond idiotic to watch those grubs.
Not a homeopath. Studied homeopathy, doesn't use it. @@provaxer8910
You listed all quacks.
please see the following videos: Deadly Deception, Exposing the Dangers of Vaccines; The Untold Story of Vaccines--silent epidemic; Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Robert De Niro, Press Conference, 2/15/17, National Press Club--Wash DC.@@Webbleking
@@lizkeith1356 thank you for all these conspiracy theories.
People have been calling for these studies FOREVER. We want to see a non-specific effects comparison of non-vaccinated populations compared to vaccinated populations (live and dead if you want).
Dr Paul Thomas pediatrician in Oregon published a study of vaxxed vs. nonvaxxed vs. partially vaxxed. Fascinating .
@@bgsjohnson i cannot find the study. Could you please share the title?
@@verarim6872 This study has been censored and Dr Paul has been "investigated." Look for his podcast "Against the Wind"
Very interesting talk. It somehow reflects why countries who seem to not have involved political, power and profit gains into decisionmaking in regards to the current challenges, who shared science in a more honest and unbiased way, have much better outcomes in terms of trust, adherence, health and other things. I'm not against vaccines, nor am I inherently pro, but I personally completely lost trust when it comes to the medical system, politics and media, having suffered a lot and still suffering from a severe chronic illness that doesn't get taken serious and costs me everything and then some, being totally exposed and dependend on some very abusive doctors and other people in power, plus the neglection of obvious risk factors for health and longevity, and the current actions of abuse of power, unproportional restriction of freedom, manipulation for questionable causes, misuse of science and dishonesty. I don't know what other people think and what all the ups and downs are, but making disease a profitable business just doesn't sit right with me.
You're right to think that. I too have autoimmune disease and have suffered medical gaslighting, abuse & neglect. Ethics is supposed to be #1.
The most important part of her talk starts 14 minute mark about how the debate has become polarized. All vaccines are neither good or bad but need to be individually investigated. Unfortunately policy has placed people into having to fully support or fully reject with no middle ground for best health outcomes.
@BoulderPM Well, the diseases they protect against are dangerous too. So, is the vaccine worse than the disease?
Exactly, libertyfizz. I see that you commented 2 years ago. Now, at the end of 2021.... it's a horribly divided world.
Two years later, we're more divided than ever.
@@cavenewt9980And a year later, even MORE divided.
Christine Stabell Benn has worked for years for Statens Serum Institut (SSI, Denmark), sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (heavily sponsoring the Oral Polio Vaccine), previously manufacturing vaccines and now developing and selling vaccines. She has also worked under NIH and WHO.
SSI is the Danish CDC.
Read Christine Stabell Benns cited studies. Seemingly not a sinlge one of them has ever used an actual placebo or an actual unvaccinated control group. None seems to have been double-blinded RCTs either. All in all their associations are as thin as paper. She seems to be nothing but a fraud here to derail the whole debate - which is already over, as there are no one even willing to argue for the pro-vaccine side anymore.
@@Calmethar Something to be wary of. But starting at 8:46 she goes in a different direction. DTP is not given a favorable review.
Genocide can be cute too!
Calmethar yeah I thought it was weird that she was promoting live oral polio when that strain is now spreading more than the Wild type.....
So what you're saying is she sounds like she knows wayyyy better than you about this topic.
If your findings are what you say they are, they don’t just “imply“ that some vaccines are harmful, they show a clear correlation: a FIVE TIMES higher mortality rate!
She was very subtle about that. That was not accidental. It was a hint: Draw your conclusions from these numbers.
I'd like to see a comparative study on natural immunity vs. vaccine immunity.
If you're sure you'd even understand the results, why don't you put a study together? Get the funding, etc.
Otto S, Mahner B, Kadow I, et al. General non-specific morbidity is reduced after vaccination within the third month of life-the Greifswald study. J Infect. 2000;41:172-175
@@J-Allen19 Medical ethics prevent such studies.
They cannot make money on natural immunity.
No money to make.
So the MMR, a live attenuated vaccine has beneficial non-specific effects? Really? Is complement mediated cell lysis and brain damage beneficial?
I think she said a "measles vaccine", implying (like Wakefield) to not vaccinate with all three at the same time. Interesting. Wonder if they'll try to destroy her career now.
Maybe it would be better administered as a separate, oral vaccine?
Professional Antivaxxer She also left out the fact that live virus vaccines shed which most outbreaks can be attributed to.
Not to mention the studies that show getting wild measles can reduce your risk of cancer and heart disease
@@cryptocowgirl4975 No most outbreaks cant be attributed to shedding.
tell us what your conflicts of interest are...
Why?
@@mjabdus86 Because people tend to get the results they are paid to get, obviously.
Yep why don't you train them to have a life time of auto immune diseases too.
And retro viruses
Faisal they don’t want them to know that ! If they do they won’t take it. And if they don’t get autoimmune they won’t make even more money it’s horrific. Usa has currently 54% chronic and or autoimmunity.
@Dhen Phu Amen Amen!
@@Closil4rel yep.
Victoria Taylor I’m autoimmune and missing multiple organs I’m 35 years old I will not take another vaccine period nor will my family
I train my own immune system thank you,by giving it what it needs and removing what it doesn't .
i agree
Amen!
train her immune system? the immune system doesn't need manipulating ; so many talking heads paid millions to preach this sermon
Exactly this has gone to far. It has been spun into some kind of crazy religion.
to be more specific, the immune system of the baby is there and ready, BUT it has been turned down, to allow for gut bacteria development among other things, during this time the baby is PERFECTLY protected by the immunity from mother's milk.
now putting in chemical poisons like vaccines into the baby, turns the anti inflamatory system inflamatory to fight the poison and also forces the immune system of the baby on!, which has long term harmful effects.
if a doctor tells u, that a baby is immunocompromised, that doctor is a morron, if the same doctor tells u, that formula is just as good as mother's milk (remember provider of baby's immunity), then that doctor should quit and u should leave that doctor asap!!!
Oh my god!! All scientists in this comment section. How come they don't ask you for your opinion given your experience and studies?
TRUE!!! AND DEGRADING!!!
perhaps we should open our minds and listen to her
More and more kids are autistic or learning disabled after ~100 jabs by the time they are teenagers.
I am 67 and did not see this happen until about 10 yrs ago; now they are stuck like pin cushions.
When I was a adolescent there were no autistic kids, period.
Just about all communicable diseases disappeared when working and middle class homes had indoor bathrooms where people bathed daily (as opposed to public baths).
Not surprised you haven't seen it until a decade ago, till sixties autistic children were just closed in some kind of mental facilities (no modern word for it, just a place to put every disabled, mentally ill or strange inside) and for some 20 years more could rarely be properly diagnosed as autistic, not mentally disabled, ill or "weird". This sht still happen in our country so unfortunately I can't say it's over...
I never met an autistic child until I was in my 20s. I am only 41 @@Nuggetsio
@@lalenacook222 we should use your personal anecdote as evidence!!! All we have to do now is wait until we get our Nobel Prize.
We're poisoning our kids...wake up...
@@Nuggetsio I worked in special school in big city over 20 years ago, and believe me, we had no autistic children. Now I work with children with autism and all their mothers say that children got autism after vaccination. Next day after vaccination they became different than before: they stopped to react on their name, stopped taking, started to be oversensitive to sound and smells.Coincidence? I do not believe so. Where I work there is more that 60 of them.
This video deserves more appreciation than it’s getting !
This lady seems to be taking a balanced view which is determined by real research, and not just opinion.
Generally I’m against vaccines, however, this should not blind us to possible benefits.
Neither should those who are in favour of vaccines dismiss the evidence !
The world seems to be getting polarised between opposing points of view, where sometimes both points of view have a degree of validity.
So I would make a plea for tolerance and understanding of each other and above all sending out positive energy to the world By being ourselves kind and compassionate to all of humankind, and the creatures to come to that.
This also implies that we should not be testing drugs and vaccines on animals who suffer enough already by people eating them and doing other terrible things to them.
Well said Richard 👍
What's amazing is that they are just NOW studying this. Safe & effective? Sounds like a marketing slogan. Here's an idea...how bout we focus on encouraging regenerative organic farming, clean water, and proper sanitation infrastructure?
I think they know exactly what is happening, but have not been forthcoming with the information.
Younger people in first world countries are much sicker than previous generations; autoimmune conditions, autism, allergies and asthma, PSYCH CONDITIONS (currently the #1 cause of disability in the US), neurologic issues.
Life expectancy is steadily falling and it's not due to Rx opioids, as some reports state. Most overdoses are due to ILLICIT fentanyl coming into the US from China. (Excuse the tangent)
The timing of this TED talk is stunning...very, very beginning of COVID 19.
Mary, this talk is the Oct. 6, 2018 TEDxAarhus. Event 201 was Oct. 18, 2019. The first covid case was Dec. 31, 2019, in China. But covid test kits were being shipped worldwide in 2018, some in 2017, test kits for a disease that had not even happened yet.
@@PeterRabbit70 you do know that coronavirus isn't one virus right? It's the name of an entire family of viruses.
It’s good to hear someone say the science isn’t settled and they don’t understand the immune system though.
please dont have kids
@@scapmen - are you also part of the depopulation agenda??
@@ImaSkeptic1 You must be a flat earther too.
@@ImaSkeptic1 i hope you get depopulated
Exactly, just like how all of a sudden the interstitium is an organ in 2015. The science is settled, except we didn't notice the largest organ in the body. We don't know how this plays into our existing knowledge of how vaccines work but totally safe and effective, don't even question our science.
Something I noticed that wasn't mentioned in the video -- that Guinea-Buissauan newborn is receiving her live polio vaccine orally. Can all live inoculations be administered orally? If so, this could resolve the adverse health threats we have observed, which seem to entail from completely bypassing the body's normal, tiered detection-and-defense system, e.g., pathogen is first noted in some mucosal membrane, preparatory action occurs in immune system, then heavy metals and/or adjuvants (are adjuvants even necessary with live vax?) can be properly filtered by the GI tract. There is no condition in human evolution which adapts it to respond productively to direct blood-injected virus, dead or alive, nor the accompanying heavy metals, adjuvants, preservatives.
But the nasal flu mist was a disaster and pulled from the market. But now it has been approved again without any change in the formula. One would think that a mist would be better than an injection though. I personally say NO to both.
@@christineblair4078 They put the flu mist back on the market because it was about to expire..Profit is the only objective. here. Even if safe effective vaccines came to be they are now learning that these normal childhood illness help the immune system later in life against cancer. Measles is especially effective against brain cancer. Guess what we have a dramatic rise in: brain cancer. Mother nature knows best. Modern medicine sadly has killed far more than it will ever save.
@@kathleenkahl very interesting about brain cancer. Thank you.
@Lex R there is a very very small chance to get polio with the live polio vaccine.
Excellent efforts by Dr. Christine Stabell Benn! I pray your voice is heard! This only confirmed what I have experienced myself as a young, 30 year old mother diagnosed with several autoimmune disorders. I went to nursing school and worked in a large hospital for five years, so I had to be fully vaccinated and received far more boosters than my peers. We need longitudinal studies in the United States! We need to know how these concoctions are effecting recipients long-term!
Nicole Gavrilov : look up Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeldt, injecting aluminum and autoimmunity.
3 words is all i have to say Acute flaccid myelitis
GBS, MS, Encephalitis, Orchitis ETC
It's listed as transverse myelitis on the inserts. ACF is a subtype of TM
Yeah the mystery polio like polio. Smh Say NO to vax a nation !
Don't forget about Polio Provocation from DTP injections...
WHY HAS THIS VIDEO NOT GONE VIRAL????......THIS IS SO IMPORTANT TO WHAT IS GOING ON TODAY WITH COVID!
Amazing talk!!
this is vaccine vs vaccine still nothing on vaccine vs no vaccine but improved living conditions
@Robert Redford II but the problem is that she does not mention that now the polio vaccine is responsible for most cases of polio. It has replaced the wild polio. Now we have the vaccine strain polio taking over.
She does not mention either other problems caused by live vaccines, like those of measles and chickenpox, that prevent children from having these diseases but now adults and babies are having these diseases instead, In the past, these two diseases were mild because children had it, not babies, not adults. Adults were immunized from their childhood diseases and mothers passed their immunity to their babies, immunity that lasted a year or two, so babies were protected. And the frequent outbreaks were boosters for adults that had chickenpox as a child, so they did not get shingles. Now even young adults get shingles because they dont get boosters from outbreaks of chickenpox in children since children are vaccinated. And babies are in danger from chickenpox and measles because their mothers vaccine has faded and the mother does not give immunity to her baby.
She does not either mention the consequences for many children of being injected with aluminum and other products in the vaccines, live or dead vaccines. These are consequences that can occur later, not always right after the vaccine. And the fragments of DNA from aborted babies, and the presence of some viruses from the tissues on which viruses are grown...she mentions none of these.
So even if she seems to be aware of the dangers of dead vaccines, she does not seem to know much about the problems in live vaccines.
Now, in this "pandemic" year, SIDS has decreased significantly. Many say it's due to missed "well-baby" appointments ergo no vaccines.
vaccines are not tested against true placebo. In some parts of the world they were compared and vaccine efficacy vs genuine placebo is not in favor of vaccine side effects. Before pharma got immunity for vaccines children below 5 were not treated with experimental vaccines and for good reason.
Dr Paul Thomas of Oregon did a study on his pediatric practice comparing non vaxx, to partially vaxed to completely vaxxed kids in his practice . The results were significant ; so significant that his license to practice was pulled.. Check out his podcast Against the Wind .
You do know that the internet is not censored yet, and when you can show me the placebo control, double blind study then we can talk.
You are joking right? if you think the internet is not censored or controlled.. Maybe it used to be..
I see u put this last year or so it says.
@@rebeccaerb9935 it is now clearly controlled and censored and we are all running out of time until they turn us into chinese like netzins with our vaccine passports social credit scores and bubble boy costumes
Oh i know n man i hope not
I hear you tho. I do
well one year on and CZcams has massive censorship removing lots of content they don't like for political or monetary reasons.
@@rebeccaerb9935 And now 6 months after your comment; censorship is thriving.
Christine Stabell Benn ❤️❤️❤️
Utroligt, at man ikke lytter mere til en ekspert som hende. Hun er en af verdens førende, når det kommer til vacciner og alligevel anvender man ikke hendes ekspertise. Man kan jo undre sig over hvorfor :/
As a safety conscious sceptic I appreciated your talk as being somewhere in the middle. I struggle with your comments on keeping the live polio vaccine though. It is proven to have horrendous adverse reactions (the main reason why it was switched to non live).
In a 3rd world country the beneficial non-specific effects the live polio vaccine may save lives. In 1st world countries with access to sanitation, antibiotics, and nutrition, kids do not typically die from infections. So, the potential non-specific benefits would be much less, and potential harm (from the vaccine shedding and actually causing polio) much greater. The other question is, is there a safer way to "train the immune system" in 3rd world countries which doesn't involve using the live polio vaccine?
@@Erika-cu7os you've answered your own question pretty much. If they focused on ploughing money into sanitation etc that would bring infectious diseases dangers to the level they are here. Treat the cause not the symptom.
I agree, I was also concerned by the fact that though she said the DTP vaccine was killing more people than the diseases, she did not seem that concerned and was more excited about how much they were learning about the immune system. I notice the WHO even though they have proved her data, still has not stopped using the DTP or switched it out for the safer DTaP that we use.
They LIE!!! They only say it’s killed.
@@Fryzers Simon, how about both. I would just encourage you to visit just one of the very poor neighbourhoods in third world country, and just imagine from there what you are talking about is multi year plan. Will probably take 20-30 years to get that executed. I have visited slums, so I can give you that perspective. And who pays for it, if poor countries had that kinda money, they wont have the problem.
This was fascinating. I tend to shut down when anything negative against vaccines is brought up, but this opened my eyes to being open to potentially unstudied effects that can help us use vaccines more beneficially.
Lol, why do you "shut down" at science? You can't start with a conclusion, that's not how science works. That is how marketing works, though.
This is interesting because they administer the polio vaccine using a dropper. It makes sense that we do not circumvent the immune systems’ layers of protection and response.
I will never understand how so many people are willing to harm our children.
Tanks for your important work! Could you please explain a little more about your findings and especially the side effects of live vaccines towards cancer?
The vaxes give you cancer...
Best danish Vaccine researcher ever 🤩
Interesting. I would also love to see the data of how those vaccinated vs unvaccinated kids develop later in life. How many get autism, allergies and autoimmune diseases?
Also, Christine was talking about live vaccines. What happens when the live vaccines are combined with live (or not) other vaccines like in MMR?
How many live vaccines is enough to train the immune system to defend itself? How about something like 72? When does the immune system actually take over from the doctor-induced immunity? Is our immune system being disposed off?
Soooooo many questions that are not only NOT being answered, but are being suppressed by the ''health'' industry. That makes me believe that they are hiding something really huge. Because if they just answered them and were able to prove their findings with INDEPENDENT research, I would trust them a lot more. Now, not a single bit...
Good question!
You are so damn right darling !!! And the doctors are pressuring you into doing it!!!
There was a study done, they fired the doctor and revoked his license. So you tell me, is it really for our health.
MMR vaccinates against three viruses, all of them are live-attenuated in the MMR vaccine.
I'm not sure you understand how research funding works. It takes millions of dollars to do a proper study, so there are no "independent" researchers; they're all chasing grants for their studies. If you want to obtain a grant, there are parameters in place for what kind of research the grant givers are willing to fund.
Catching mild childhood natural infections clearly makes you stronger.
Ah yes, polio, the disease that famously make you stronger.
do you know what a double blind PLACEBO safety study is?
Do YOU ?
@@provaxer8910 i learned that in high school... pro vaxers apparently haven't
@@ironjudas666 lol .. sure you did dude .. sure you did.
Very interesting! Thanks! I hope our experts learn from it before it is too late?
Very funny comment!
I love this! Thank you for another great talk!
Given the choice between a live virus vaccine and all the associated potential ADRs, or exclusive breastfeeding as recommended by the WHO, surely the second merits funding for research.
Why would you research breastfeeding already recommended by WHO based on existing research?
@@dorte3481 there is no profit to be made in breastfeeding or any research related to breastfeeding.
@Beverly Johnson true, but I don’t really see the relevance here. Extensive research already exists - which is why it is widely recommended. Why do we need more?
What if they get both? Does it kill more, the same, or less?
As healthcare professionals, I believe that we owe it to the communities that we serve to continuously reevaluate the safety and efficacy of vaccines in different populations; this would include assessing specific effects, nonspecific effects, and the potential for reaction with other drugs or vaccines. According to the Center for Disease Control, after vaccines are licensed, they are monitored closely as people begin using them. The purpose of this monitoring is to watch for adverse events and additional side effects. Monitoring a vaccine after it has been approved for use in the public helps ensure that the benefits continue to outweigh the risks. In doing so, we would be upholding the ethical principle of nonmaleficence, which ensures that we must do no harm intentionally. This principle guides medical providers to provide a standard of care which avoids risk or minimizes it, as it relates to medical competence. By continuing to assess and reassess the safety and efficacy of vaccines, both new and old, we ensure that we are only doing good for our patients and are not causing any harm by any specific or nonspecific effects as our environment and medical interventions continue to change.
With non live vaccines, in order to get the same immune response adjuvants have been added, which have been shown to cause a host of side effects. Many long term and are accumulative. They only tested the blood to determine whether the adjuvants stayed in the body, but post mortem autopsies revealed these adjuvants had implanted into organs, tissue and the brain. Again, the accumulation is there and undeniable. Yet, live vaccines are now off the table.
Going backwards rather than forwards. The hubris and arrogance is infuriating.
We should all smoke a joint,sit back meditate and realise one day we're all going to die, enjoy your life,it's a journey
If you live to 100, good luck to you,if you get hit by a car tomorrow that's life, go with the flow,all this negativity creates stress,which creates confusion.
Have a great happy Life, you only get one.
Amazing woman. Unfortunately she had to compromise about the live viruses benefits, otherwise she would have never been able to talk on TED Talk. Truth is Vaccines are bad live or not.
That's not the truth. That's some batshit crazy paranoia that you're mad most sane people don't buy into.
Emy, do you have specific evidence for this statement?
@@karinpowers1018 do your own research like i did.
@@emybonefin330 Yes, well I have. Thousands of hours worth, actually. And your much more limited research has led you to vastly oversimplify the evidence.
@@karinpowers1018 ha ha ha . You wasted thousand of hours. Or maybe not if you are paid for that ;) More, and more doctors, nurses and scientists say that vaccines are dangerous. There is none, who thought that vaccines were dangerous and changed his/her opinion, but many who thought they were save and worked, but now they know that it is opposite.
I have seen this video 4 times...
15:47 "And meanwhile the clock is ticking." Damn! That timing, though! Look at the upload date, lol.
Awesome. Tragic. I hope that she keeps pushing. It is so important.
Thank you for your work! It is so important. Do you think we should look at the difference between oral and injected live vaccines? I would be very interested to see if there may be a difference as you would expect the stimulation pathway to be very different.
Vaccines cause more diseases.
Maybe the most importen TED talk in 2021...
I would also like to know when she talks a the Measles vaccines is it only Measles or is it MMR as we know this is not a safe vaccine and are they giving these babies up 79 vaccines like the USA with the highest baby 0-12 months mortality.
The MMR vaccine is very safe and effective, so safe that in the absence of any medical contraindication it should be made mandatory.
i think it’s not always a matter of vaccines as much as it is access to sterile and safe medical care, clean water and modern plumbing that makes the difference in the number of cases reported in a first world vs first world country.
I'm surprised CZcams didn't delete this video yet.
Same here. I just got the link from a friend and skipped through it before viewing; First thing I did was download it for offline storage, because this kind of stuff tends to 'vanish'.
Probably because the presentation's rhetoric stays nicely under the radar of the algorithm.
15:13 Dr Benn: "The vaccine skeptics on the other side may find that our observations on non-live vaccines confirm their worst fears: that vaccines can be harmful, but they may be more reluctant to accept the beneficial effects. And their focus on the negative effects may make the vaccine supporters take an even more rigid stance. In my opinion, neither side is right or wrong. Both sides miss the new perspective."
So let's make an expanding vaccine schedule mandatory for everyone starting from birth, claim the science proves all vaccines are safe for all people, call the skeptics dangerous anti-vaxxers, and make laws to punish those who don't obey. Makes sense.
What is the "new perspective"?
@@BradKandyCroftFamily NWO? Does that ring a bell?
If you vaccine works then you should not care who get a vax and who doesn't. You can't force any form of medical treatment on people.
@Gee Yes, you can, that's the irony of OP's statement. Do you not realize that in the US, there *is* a mandatory vaccine schedule for children to attend publicly funded schools?
My friend recommended TED talks to me.....this is the first one I clicked on.....and lost interest in all others.....cannot believe what this lady is saying....so many sold souls....
no don't - TED is full of sincere, interesting & educative information, you just had a rough luck with the first one ;) as they say in my country - the first pancake is always a mess :D))
Could we use a live polio vaccine on adults? Also, might this help the body combat Covid-19?
Live just means using the original disease so it's very counterintuitive if you want to stop the spread of diseases.
If the goal is to get rid of polio, replacing oral polio vaccine with a more thoroughly dead vaccine is important. Most of the polio cases we have now are a consequence of oral polio vaccines, since they can cause an infection with a weakened form of polio. Check out the GPEI website for a current score on polio eradication, broken down by strain.
@@MBOgonnaPWNu Agreed. With even one case of oral vaccine derived polio, you can't eradicate polio.
@@MBOgonnaPWNu You are saying things that vaguely sound like you disagree, but you are not actually disagreeing with what I said. Do you think you are disagreeing?
Search "gpei polio endgame strategy". They think that using IPV is an essential part of the process, and I agree with them.
Good discussion but there's ample more research to be conducted. Epidemiological studies are great at identifying trends and asking broad questions, such as identifying general, non-specific effects, but there's far more research needed to get anyone to take action. What *SHOULD* be done, is an in-depth study into each vaccine to attempt to narrow down what causes these non-specific effects. Why are kids dying 5x more often after receiving a vaccine versus their non-vaccinated counterparts? Or why is there an 30% increased mortality rate for children who don't receive live polio vaccine? The powers that be will not take action over a few epidemiological studies - they only use them to solidify their current stance. What are needed are finer tuned epidemiological studies and biological studies. Though, I highly doubt anyone will fund said studies if there's any risk to the status quo.
Interesting knowing there are a great deal of coronavirus cases that are asymptomatic or produce mild effect.
Basically if you're going to vaccinate your children you're far better off going with live vaccines than dead vaccines, which if you're going to go with live vaccines the question arises why not just allow your children get sick naturally over the course of their childhood rather than dump diseases into them as a baby, but it looks like the antivaccine community was correct when they said traditional vaccines are harmful to the health of our children, and you're better off allowing the body to fight off real infections naturally.
that's a step into the right direction. the next talk should be about the survival of vaccinated with life vaccine vs vaccinated...
How can we help? And what about covid?
what about all the toxins that are in vaccines alive or not???
Neurological symptoms seen in some kids post vaccination....
Anyone considering Epigenetics and Parental source?
Venn Diagram overlapping of environmental pollutants and pesticide exposure of the Parents and kids, combined with some carrying agent or other item in the vaccination from production process differences?
Evident in waves of symptoms in cohorts /regions cross-referenced with all those variables?
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Africa/We ,are blessed to have you as a doctor/researcher!
From what I gather she is saying..we don't really know what vaccines are doing to people..then why such negative comments?
She pointed out they kill babies. So we know they do that. But if we don't know what they do, why are we giving them out like candy, especially to children? It's equivalent to finding some random pill on the ground and handing it to your kid and saying, here you go, it's made by a pharmaceutical company so it must make you healthy. Why are we taking something we don't understand what it all does?
Vaccines given to pregnant women were never safety tested on pregnant women. And one study shows there are 7 times more miscarriages in mothers that are vaccinated during pregnancy. Vaccines are for depopulation. Vaccines don't save lives, they kill.
Tell Bill Gates, a DTP proponent.
Tak
Why were you giving a polio vaccine where there was no threat of polio?
Good question. Let me know if these pro vaxxers have an answer
*11:00** oooh! novel market! boy & girl vacs!* pity the sugstn will get you cancelled now. -JC
THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED
Yes here are the results of a vaccine study Results
Among 3-5-month-old children, having received DTP (± OPV) was associated with a mortality hazard ratio (HR) of 5.00 (95% CI 1.53-16.3) compared with not-yet-DTP-vaccinated children.
Why do people get sick?
This is scary in so many levels…….Children (people) are dying even though we could save them. But by doing that, we become to many people in the world !!. In a hundred years (mayby before), we might be living the movie Elysium. Some people say...I hope when I die, that I´ll come back in some form......well me, I hope that I DONT !
Polio cases went down, AFM went up after taking polio vaccines.
I am definitely a vaccine skeptic, but what this Researcher says it worth considering. I have read some of the papers her group has written. And it is not just the kind of vaccine, but when they are given (what age and also the order vaccines are give) that determine whether children in Guinea B. are protected or more likely to die from other diseases. There is a trend with the live vaccines of whatever kind that enable children to survive despite the many infectious diseases. Thee is an equal trend for children to be less like to survive if they have been given any of the non-live vaccines. Vaccines are going to be made whether we like it or not, we might as well do it in the least harmful way - especially given that Covid is here and mandatory vaccines are being foisted on us. It is because of her group's work that I want to hold out for the Valneva live vaccine despite the intense coercion to get vaccinated today. We can't all live in a forest and have the luxury of ignoring vaccine mandates. Kudos to those who can!
Well, specifically in the case of Covid, it seems like the very best sort of live "vaccination" is natural immunity through infection. This would be for healthy people. People with comorbidities, especially severe comorbidities, will have a very different risk/benefit analysis.
Greetings from the forest!
I work in construction. Several of our projects had mandates; one of my project managers said "ok, here's a 90k change order to cover days off for my guys to go get vaxxed and to account for sick days" They dropped that mandate, lol. All we had to do was make it expensive for them. All we had to do was band together and say "no".
They did a good job of making you think you were alone and "bad", didn't they?
а может мы будем просто болеть хотя бы корью и ветрянкой? и на них потренируемся?
The question is : knowing that the colateral effect of the live virus vaccine is to reenforces the imunologial system , why does the pharmaceutical industry choose to replace them by the dead virus vaccine?
Shelf stability for one, it's probably cheaper to produce. And their marketing is so thorough that most people don't even know the live vaccines exist anymore.
Also, they can do fun stuff like add sterilizing drugs to shelf stable vaccines (WHO was caught doing this in the 90s with DPT vaccines in Africa, I believe).
*☼ measles! ius it measles? it's not is it.*
Never seen a TEDx intro like that lol
(cringe)
and you doing that research in Africa because nobody on Earth will let you do it in western countries... like in 2019 Mengele spirit is still alive
Is this also tested with the yearly flu vaccin. Possible then a dangerous vaccin to take year after year for decades...
Tak for jeres kæmpe arbejde
Everyone watch the highwire with del big tree here on CZcams and Facebook
Homoeopathic Medicine already does that. Without all the harms.
1. I had to like google Guinea-Bissau - i'm sorry. i'm sure i'm not the only one who didn't know where it was
2. OMG. it's so sad. they don't wanna name their kids because they will die :(
How about tell people to stop eating sugar and processed food
So we should seek to contract weak disease's in order to train our immune systems.
not enough money in live virus vaccines
Clean water
The whole issue is very simple.
We are FREE, sovereign beings that must be able to decide what to put in our body. Parents must have the absolute right to decide what is put in the bodies of their children.
If not, then we have 1984 come true.
I feel that as we know that all scheduled vaccines are acceptably safe they should be made mandatory. Paranoid parents should bot be able to refuse beneficial vaccines for their children - they do not own their children do they?
It is up to the medical authorities to mandate childhood vaccinations and for governments to impose monthly fines for for each vaccination missed.
"Shill"
Why would I want to train my immune system? Give me a break
Sounds like someone was paid off pretty well.
They always have that almost freakish smile in their face. It's creepy.
Like a psychopath mimicking emotion
Has TED Talks had an opposing view on Vaccinations?
That’s an interesting question 🤔
Wow this was so educational I will only be vaccinating my children with live vaccines. Not the others. Thabk you for explaining in detail. I got answers to questions I didn't know I had
You do know live vaccines contain the full original disease right? That's why they're called _live_ vaccines. So you're infecting your kids on purpose which is very counterintuitive.
I’m going to be sick...
If we have good health y hospitals are increasing
Where's the peer-reviewed academic-mathematical document, then?
They're not required to publish that. They interpret the data to prove their point overlooking the true implications.