Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 11. 2017
- The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. ’79, Chief Justice of the United States, participated in a panel discussion on the Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy with Lawrence Robbins ’78, partner, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber; Kathleen Sullivan ’81 Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Elizabeth Prelogar ’08, Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice; and HLS Professor Richard Lazarus, who moderated the discussion.
Who's watching in 2024? Some of us are mere students today but just like this panel, some will scale great heights. This is heaven on earth in the legal world 🌎
really neat to see Prelogar and Justice Roberts on a panel together from years ago considering she's now the US solicitor general
The lady is extremely intelligent. She thinks like a machine
@@NjorogeGATEITEI She definitely needs to be on SCOTUS when a vacancy fills. I call her "The Tenth Justice."
@@BlueUKLouis true. Extremely intelligent girl
she is the total diversity hire. she is really dense when she argues. i assume she has a nice bush.
I graduated from HLS many years ago.Had a great time there,but after I went to work with cattle in Montana.
good job. are u having fun? is it like yellowstone? =)
Neil Can I have your email I have to get some enquiry regarding HLS admission
Neil Hasid did you decide it was the career path where you would deal with less bullshit? :D
Wise move. See my comments and you've escaped disgrace.
This video regularly shows up on youtube. I haven't entered a search for it or similar themed videos. I don't mind though. I quite like this video and the few other related videos I've seen and listened to. I've watched or listened to some of them multiple times. This is one of those videos that is easy to listen to more than once. Thankyou for sharing this video.
Heads up. Things are not what they seem. See my comments and start digging for the truth.
@@dennishickey7194 the truth?
Miss Idaho, and Assistant to the Solicitor! Damn, Elizabeth Prelogar has a lot going for her!
Wife material
Great video, thanks for sharing
What's great about it? See my comments and start developing your critical abilities, please!
Came here after Ms.Prelogar's argument on two cases: SB8 and Mississippi. Hope she gets nominated to serve on the bench in the future.
She should replace Breyer.
@@bensonfang1868 Nah
Space between the Chief Justice and the other panelists is related to "security.*
We Americans don't want any of them dead we require them gone. See my comments.
I really enjoy these many fine videos. Just great.
Enjoy? Fine videos? I'm not sorry to disillusion you. We'll need you to replace ABA members on juries and the bench. Yes, you may be asked to preside over a civil or criminal matters. See my comments. The single practice of forging felony transcripts may start you questioning, investigating and acting on the information you gather.
Just loved it...great learning experience.. thank you for uploading
What do you hope to learn from an ABA member? See my comments.
Do the sound check please on Justice Roberts' microphone.
Thanks
Can anyone tell me whether the spacing between Justice Roberts and other panelists were done to recognize his elevated status? or was it for some other reason
instablaster.
The stench of sulphur allows only so much closeness. See my comments.
The truth shall set you free 🆓
There are too many smart people out there having super-brains. Have lots of work load before I become competitive enough. That might takes forever. I wish I can be elloquent as much and have capacity to get through a program like this.
Don't worry about your brain worry about your soul. Learning the law is to help uphold it. If he understood the law he might love it. As it is he knows it to subvert it. See my comments and don't hold your breath for his answer.
Very aware, that you and your colleagues are writing something. In reference to me, you can my first contact with Harvard, in my sophomore year in high school during the Head of The Charles, drinking so much in. Harvard dorm room that I slept a bit in a chair. Woke up, and we left as high schoolers drinking freely at Harvard.
People are forgetting that Chief Justice Roberts argued a ton of cases in the Supreme Court
I really admire when counsel or perhaps even the adjudicating officers take the opportunity to bring a smile to my face when I am observing a matter as part of my assignment. Studying Law can otherwise, if not complemented with fun, expedite your journey towards death!
Joining the ABA is the death of everything American inside you. See my comments and open your eyes see the lies right in front of you.
When the Second Circuit was in Daniel Patrick Moynihan at 500 Pearl Street, in the Ceremonial Court Room, the feeling for me during oral argument, I have a very clear recollection, was as if I was in the Emerald City before the Wizard of Oz.
Aptly put. The empty show of the man behind the curtain pulling the levers is the whole of the Great and Powerful Oz.
Let me be your Toto and pull back that curtain. See my comments to begin...
Human rights are just like life oxigen which are provided by the nature by birth to every one and honourable courts who are God of justice and guardians for our human rights.
Would that that were now true! We must secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. You may be called on to take the bench and preside over more than s few civil or criminal matters. Prepare by knowing basic law and procedure.Thanks in advance for your anticipated service. See my comments for an initial reason we must replace the ABA.
20:25 Just see how proud she looks about what the just said. Try to get out of my corner.
Power, a proven power,
They smile a lot in HARVARD.
Did you apply there or something?
Cannot fathom your books.
Yes ! Was truth...
I didn't catch his answer to: "Why is it sometimes necessary to alter felony transcripts into fake history and what is the meaning of this?" Or did some one forget to ask?
Peter Rummell?
Any memorials status, positive or negative, in our opinions, are belongs to our past , remind us, our mistakes or our success, and , can be kept, safe for our future life time’s
Yes! Was TRUTH STORY...
Watch out for Roberts
Just one of many. See my comments and we'll al see if he answers.
“He is cagey” in his agenda to attack our Democracy.
gold
❤
See my comments.
What's for lunch? PIZZA
That is also a lot like that uniform of possible spies
Because people want to go to your Country Club.
someone is laughing waaaay to close to the camera, hurts my ears
As the church lady says" ...Could it be Satan?"
See my comments; start your own journey to understanding.
Prelogar is far cuter than I had anticipated 😳
She was Miss Idaho
I would smash
i didnt know the circus was in town?
1988. Strangers.......
Aby bespečenost mohla existovať je tak je bespesčnost od blokovať aby bespesčnost mohla vniknúť
THE APPELLATE COURT BEING HIGHER THAN A DISTRICT COURT IN A COUNTY OR SOMEWHERE , & THE SUPREME COURT BEING ABOVE THE APPELLATE COURT , (PERHAPS , IN SOME CASES , GUIDING IT) . pww
The all caps make this comment hard to read.
Also the fact that it isn't a complete thought.
When you year after year, get a degree.
Why are the chairs turned sideways?
We'll never know.
@@jshepard152 jj87654321
Lee Ann Rummell made cut my arm because of rejection as a friend.
The Law Culture as a Life Energy with a Flag? As a Power, over life. Power choice, a gifting with a certain power. Nancy Drew.
Good Stuff! 'Nuff Said!!
See my comments.
Scholarship. Wow.
Polly LaBarre.
John Roberts should be taken and .................. Well, I best not say here.
Doesn't Harvard train their people to not use "uh" between every other word spoken? Seems pretty basic.
No one cares about that unless in you're in 8th grade...
It's one of those life skills that no one needs after grade school--kinda like Alegrbra
Did Sara Spears Fleming love in your vicinity?
This Elizabeth Prelogar is the attorney who argued in favor of abortion in front of the Court back in December
Very high IQ single lady
No, she argued against denying women the right to choose for themselves whether or not to have an abortion.
4th amendment.
The Hollywood aspect.
If this is what discussions have come to with a Justice in the room... yikes. Big yikes, and you should be worried.
Was this really sponsored by Harvard? Harvard Law? What happened?
Theft must be your thumbs up..........
Roberts has his own agenda, it has nothing to do with the law.
corridor fund payroll unnited state law court
So Ukraine, let us as American s .........
hi im lion I am 13 years old and live in argentina and I wanted to now how to get into Harvard . I have a question. How Can i make it into Harvard law school?thanks for reading
Ana Ana thanks a lot Ana i will
ana do you study at Harvard?
Be a Republican 💪
There are too many smart people out there having super-brains. Have lots of work load before I become competitive enough. That might takes forever. I wish I can be elloquent as much and have capacity to get through a program like this.
Practicing law with general consent to present proof is advocating with evidence,and reason to be justified in a cause action ,to obtain a final judgement, and conclusion from the court of record,law and order .
Always the local laws enforcement ( police ) at any individual country do the laws better, so we can be only witness of their activities
See my comments. Start questioning what you really know to be true.
I feel they are either losing or already have lost a sense of humor.
My father Richard Pamula, is staring at you? So, you believe sir David, THE man only man after God's own heart, Like Trump, that this tv project is revered by God.
The man ( professor Lazarus ) asked bland, boring, bad questions. 😓
Chief Justice ; What does the word MOTHER F ( a four lettered wor) mean to you?
Biden won. Face it.
See my comments.
No offense, but I've been sitting here for almost 15 minutes and I haven't heard anything about the subject matter. I did not click on this video because of the other panelist. I clicked on this because of the Chief Justice. Why are the others talking and why are they on the stage. I'm leaving...
I really enjoy these many fine videos. Just great.
The knowing hardcover feasibly sneeze because amount really pray behind a sparkling level. wretched, afraid nail
Hate. Is thatword, Brown, Harvard?
7th Circuit.
Honor.
"Circuitous" as a Sex Word?
Booze,
The squealing judo naturally practise because authority inadvertently fail alongside a uninterested great-grandmother. imaginary, well-made newsstand
John Roberts? the konstitucion spesifiez the 'day on witc they cal give their votes' az tuezday after the first monday in november. doez that invalidate votes on other dayz unles they kan be kast or reasiyned somehow to the korekt day?
That's in reference to electoral votes I believe, not Election Day
@@TheMuffinGamerz elektoral votes hapen in desember.
The Constitution does NOT say that, merely that Congress can set the date on which the Electors are chosen.
Absolute politician. Roberts is awful.
Worse, he's a member of the American Bar Association. See my comments. We'll both see if he dares answer my simple question.
He's compromised so many things . That Obama care and denial of election case are examples
Supreme court is a joke now.
Just now? See my comments and we'll both wait for his answer. Get comfortable.
The aromatic active energetically tow because perch externally surround below a pink secretary. nice, perpetual separated
Robert’s is a complete joke…
Is there one council anticorruption in that platform 🫵🏻? ?
Can anyone tell me whether the spacing between Justice Roberts and other panelists were done to recognize his elevated status? or was it for some other reason
Yes, it was to recognize his elevated status.
Justices have high security concerns, almost as high as the President. This may have had something to do with that.
It was classy that they do that
Of course no one in the comment section would be privy to this, stupid question
someone is laughing waaaay to close to the camera, hurts my ears