The Artificial Intelligence Dilemma: Can Laws Keep Up?
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 06. 2024
- On May 16, a Senate subcommittee held its first congressional hearing on artificial intelligence. While the tech industry touts AI's many benefits - personalized learning, content creation, scientific discovery - the technology's risks have also come into focus: disinformation, job loss, and, some experts warn, AI could be an existential threat to humanity. Now Congress is paying attention. But the question of how, or even if the government is capable of putting guardrails around such a fast-moving technology, is unclear.
In this video, we look at what laws are currently in place to regulate AI, what options lawmakers should consider, and what role the tech industry should play.
Video features:
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA)
Brad Smith, President, Microsoft
James Grimmelmann, Cornell Law School professor of tech and IP law
the answer ist, "no never nope &nada"
can't bring cheques up to that entrance 📜
03:03 As an AI, I can confirm this!😂
Laws are NOT the problem. Its the corruption of those who Program and Operate the AI Systems.
And since we don't seem to be able to control those who are corrupt, the problem is worse than we realize.
Karma 💯
Title 47 USC is broad enough to regulate Artificial intelligence as form of media / communication? Just as there are laws on call spoofing, AI use of voice can be voice spoofing, or face image spoofing. How about impersonation laws? We out to separate AI used as an "automation tool" versus that of "a fraud tool"! Regulations must be in place to incorporate fraud flags in the AI language.
what laws ⚖️
🙅🏼♀️🏧🙇🏽♀️
I don’t know how it could pass the bar exams when it hardly passes my company law assignments? 😂 The students answers produced by AI don’t even qualify for pass. 😂 what kind of exam questions are part of the bar exam? My course rubrics are very detailed and specific. Trust me ChatGPT, well the present one, has many shortcomings.
Amen
Most Magnificent The Lord 🌱
😂