Shaykh Uthman Clarifies About Daniel Haqiqatjou | Nouman Ali Khan | Yasir Qadi
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 08. 2023
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @randomdawah
Credits: @5Pillars
The Full Podcast: • Uthman Ibn Farooq | Ha...
DISCLAIMER
The individuals speaking in this video are solely responsible for their own views and opinions expressed, and they do not necessarily reflect the views of my channel.
TikTok: @randomdawah
Instagram: @randomdawah
Twitter: @randomdawah
Rumble: @randomdawah
Facebook: @randomdawah - Zábava
I think as long as the matter is private, it should be discussed in private. If someone is publicly spreading wrong ideas, then the first approach should be to discuss with the responsible person to convince him and correct himself publicly. If he refuses then to save common people from misguidance, it should be refuted publicly.
Exactly.
100%
Eating was more important to mawiyah bin hinda lanati rather than obey Allah Messenger pbuh till Allah Messenger pbuh prayed against that Maloon
sahih muslim 6628
Ibn Abbas reported: I was playing with children that Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya. I returned and said: He is busy in taking food. He again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in taking food, whereupon he said: May Allah not fill his belly! Ibn Muthanna, said: I asked Umm Umayya what he meant by the word Hatani. He said: It means he patted my shoulders.
Best way possible
@@tmffj *_Tawassul by virtue of the Prophets & the righteous🔥Seeking Rescue from the Living & Dead & Making Tawassul Through Them🔥Excerpt:Quote:As for seeking rescue from the dead, from the Prophets & other than them, it is not permissible & it is from the Major Shirk. As for seeking rescue from the one who is alive and present (in the vicinity) & seeking rescue from him in that which he is capable of, then there is no harm in that, due to the saying of Allah, the Sublime, "The man of his (own) party asked him (fastaghathahu) for help against his foe✅️QURAN 28:15✅️As for Tawassul through the living or the dead, from the Prophets or other than them, by way of their physical essences, or their honour, or their right, then it is not permissible. It is from the innovations & the means that lead towards Shirk🔥Tawassul to Allah by virtue & honor of His Awliya is of several kinds:1️⃣When a person asks a living Wali to supplicate to Allah for them that Allah may extend their provision, cure their diseases, or guide them to the right path. This is HALAL & some of the Sahabah asked the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to supplicate to Allah for rainfall & the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم invoked his Lord who responded to his Dua & subsequently rain fell heavily. The Sahabah themselves asked AlAbbas ibnAbd AlMuttalib to invoke Allah for rain during the caliphate of Umarرضي الله عنه✅️They called upon him to make Dua to Allah for rain. AlAbbas made Dua to his Lord and they all said Amin after him✅️There were other similar incidents that took place during the lifetime of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم & after. Muslims used to ask others to supplicate to Allah for them to bring benefit or ward off harm2️⃣Asking Allah through the love of His Prophet & following his Sunnah & also through loving His Awliya by saying:O Allah I ask you by my love for Your Prophet & my following his Sunnah & by my love for Your Awliya to grant me such-and-such.” This is HALAL because it is a Tawassul from a servant to his Lord through his own good deeds he has done. It is authentically narrated in a Hadith that the people who were trapped in the cave asked Allah to save them by virtue of their righteous deeds3️⃣Asking Allah through the virtue & honor of His Prophets or one of His Awliya’ by saying, “O Allah I ask You by virtue of Your Prophet or by the honor of Al-Husayn…” & this kind of Tawassul is NOT ALLOWED‼️& HARAM MAJOR SIN🔥Though the honor of the Awliya is great, especially that of Prophet Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم it cannot be relied on as a means of answering the Dua🔥That is why when the Sahabah suffered from drought, they did not make Tawassul to Allah for rain by virtue of the Prophet’s honor🔥They asked the Prophet’s uncle AlAbbas to supplicate to Allah although the Prophet’s honor is the greatest✅️Moreover it has never been narrated on the authority of any of the Sahabah رضوان الله عليهم that they made Tawassul through the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم after his death, while they are the best of Muslim generations, who knew well his esteem and were the most loving of him4️⃣A servant asking His Lord for their need swearing by one of His Awliya or Prophets, or by their virtue saying:O Allah‼️I ask You to grant me such-&-such thing by virtue of so-&-so or by the right of Your Prophet so-&-so.” This again is NOT ALLOWED & HARAM‼️🔥because just adjuring a person by the life or virtue of another is prohibited & is even more prohibited when it comes to Allah🔥Furthermore no servant of Allah no matter how pious & obedient they are, is entitled to such status that makes others adjure Allah or beseech Him by their virtue🔥This opinion is supported by legal proofs & on the basis of which the Islamic creed is protected & is regarded a means to block the ways leading to Shirk_*
www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=16&Topic=9807
May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman and Help us follow the correct Aqeedah and manhaj...Ameen
Yea u guys are not salafi. You guys follow adul wahhab and his manhaj, so don't call urselves salafis its morally sanctimonious. In reality you guys are wahhabis and you guys demean and mock the Salaf. Thats the truth of your sect.
so is daniel wrong? czcams.com/video/7Xyj5s61Zg4/video.html
*Deobandi "ulamas" & heads were pure mushriks the deobandi akabireen! MUSHRIK ASHRAF ALI TANWI, THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI, HIS FAVOURITE DREAM BRIDE QASIM NANOTWI, IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI ANOTHER MUSHRIK WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ALSO THE WRITER OF FAZAEL AMAL ZIKRIYA KHANDELWI CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ANOTHER MUSHRIK!*
*_5 PILLARS OF ISLAM1⃣SHAHADAH2⃣SALAH3⃣ZAKAH4⃣SAWM5⃣HAJJ_*
*_6 PILLARS OF EMAN1⃣AMANTU BILLAHI2⃣WAMALAIKATIH3⃣WAKUTUBIH4⃣WARUSULIH5⃣WALYAWMILAKHIR6⃣WALQADRI KHAYRIHI WASHARRIHI MINALLAH_*
*THERE ARE 17 FARD/COMPULSORY RAKATS OF 5 DAILY PRAYERS✅OF WHICH 11 ARE BATINI/QUIET RAKATS & 6 ARE JAHRI/LOUD RAKATS✅SURAH FATIHA MUST BE RECITED IN EVERY RAKAH AS PROVEN IN MANY SAHIH HADITHS & SURAH FATIHA IS NOT FORGIVEN OR EXCUSED FOR ANYONE WHETHER ITS THE IMAM OR CONGREGANTS/THE ONES PRAYING BEHIND AN IMAM✅ALL THE SAHABA RECITED SURAH FATIHA EVEN IN THE LOUD RAKATS WHERE THE IMAM FINISHES HIS FATIHA AS PROVEN FROM ALL THE SAHIH HADITHS ABOVE*
1⃣4⃣ *PILLARS OF SALAH1⃣STANDING2⃣OPENING TAKBIR3⃣SURAH FATIHA 4 BOTH IMAM & CONGREGANTS4⃣RUKU/BOWING5⃣STAND FROM RUKU6⃣SUJOOD/PROSTRATING7⃣RISING FROM SUJOOD8⃣JALSA/SITTING BETWEEN 2 SUJOODS9⃣CALMNESS IN ALL ACTIONS OF SALAH🔟PERFORMING ALL PILLARS IN ORDER1⃣1⃣FINAL TASHAHHUD1⃣2⃣SITTING DOWN 4 IT1⃣3⃣SENDING SALAT ON MUHAMMADﷺ1⃣4⃣2 TASLEEMS* ☑
8⃣ *WAJIBAT OF SALAH1⃣ALL TAKBIRS EXCEPT OPENING TAKBIR (SINCE ITS A PILLAR)2⃣SAY SAMIALLAHU LIMAN HAMIDAH 4 BOTH IMAM & CONGREGANTS3⃣SAY RABBANA WALAKAL HAMD4⃣DURING RUKU SAY SUBHANA RABBIYAL AZEEM5⃣DURING SUJOOD SAY SUBHANA RABBIYAL A'LA6⃣BETWEEN 2 SUJOODS SAY RABBIGHFIRLEE7⃣1ST TASHAHHUD8⃣SITTING DOWN 4 IT* ☑
Hadith
*حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ، مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْعَلاَءِ حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَامِرٍ الْعَقَدِيُّ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مَنِيعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أَحْمَدَ الزُّبَيْرِيُّ، قَالُوا حَدَّثَنَا كَثِيرُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ رُبَيْحِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ قَالَ*
*لاَ وُضُوءَ لِمَنْ لَمْ يَذْكُرِ اسْمَ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ*
*It was narrated from AbuSaeed that:The Messenger of Allah said: "There is no ablution for one who does not mention the Name of Allah (before doing it)✅Hasan✅Darussalam💧Vol. 1 Hadith 397 Book 1 Hadith 429 Ibn Majah*
💧 *WUDU MUST BE MADE WITH CORRECT STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE EVEN IF A PERSON DIPS IN A POOL OR TAKES A FULL SHOWER💧BCUZ 1 OF THE CONDITIONS OF WUDU IS IT MUST BE DONE IN CORRECT ORDER💧YOU CAN MAKE WUDU ANYTIME💧WITH OR WITHOUT CLOTHES WUDU IS VALID💧REMOVING CLOTHES DOES NOT BREAK OR SPOIL WUDU IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM* ✅
*1 Wash hands starting from the fingers to the wrist 3 times* *2 Rinse & gargle ur mouth thoroughly & spit out 3 times* *3 Hold water with right hand close to nose & inhale & sniff some water slowly inside & clean the nostrils & blow out the water from the nose itself 3 times* *4 Wash entire face 3 times with both hands cupped with water & it must reach ear to ear door as well as from forehead hair line to neck* *5 Wash right hand starting again from the fingertips to elbows 3 times* *6 Wash left hand likewise* *7 Take little water with both your wet hands & wipe your entire head from forehead to the back of your neck & WIPE BACK TO THE FOREHEAD IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION ONLY ONCE!* *8 Use wet index fingers to clean the inside of ears & thumbs to clean the outside ONCE* *9 Finally wash right foot upto the ankle thrice* *10 Wash left ankle likewise*
⛔☝🏻💡 *CORRECT YOUR MISTAKES IN WUDU💧ESPECIALLY ISTINSHAAQ=CLEANING THE NOSTRILS☝🏻I ESPECIALLY ALERTED ABOUT ISTINSHAAQ BCUZ MOST people just sprinkle water into their noses without even INHALING & sniffing it inside AND EXHALING & BOWING IT OUT BY THE NOSE ITSELF!👃💧THIS IS THE ONLY VALID METHOD❗✔IF YOUR WUDU ABLUTION IS INVALID, ALL YOUR PRAYERS ARE ALSO INVALID🔥FEAR ALLAH SHARE THE KHAIR WITH EVERYONE JazakAllahukhairaa🗣Tag any1 who is unaware of the dangers of NOT following the proper procedure like the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم ﷺ* 🌴
*_It is FARD/obligatory upon The True Muslim to affirm the Asma/Names & Sifat/Attributes of Allah, without committing:1️⃣Tahreef:To attach figurative & metaphorical meanings to the attributes of Allah, while denying the apparent meaning of the attribute2️⃣Ta'teel:Leaving & vacating🔥Negation/Denial of His Attributes & denial of His Self & Being. Denial of the real meaning proved by the Quran & Sunnah🔥Tahreef includes Tateel but Ta'teel does not include Tahreef🔥There are 2 types of Tateel:❌️1)Absolute Tateel: Which the Jahamiyyah committed:Denying all attributes of Allah❌️2)Partial Tateel:Which the Ash’ariyya & maturidiyya commit:Denying all attributes of Allah by Tahreef & affirming only 7 (Ashariyah) & 8 (Maturidiyah) attributes of Allah3️⃣Takyeef:To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are such & such or to put questions as to the state of His Attributes. The term "beghair Takyeef' means that the AhlusSunnah deny having knowledge of Allah's condition as Allah alone knows the state of His Self & His Attributes4️⃣Tamtheel: To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are like the Attributes of His creatures5️⃣Tafweed: To have faith that it’s not the apparent meaning which is meant but only Allah alone knows the meanings of the attributes6️⃣Tajseem:To have faith that Allah has a body. (We as AhlusSunnah neither affirm nor negate the attribute of body, since nothing has come in Quran & Sunnah concerning it & Aqeeda is a matter purely based on Revelation/Wahi as mentioned by Shaykh IbnUthaymeen RAHIMAHULLAH & Shaykhul Islam IbnTaymiyyah RAHIMAHULLAH✅So we do NOT affirm that He has a body while affirming his attributes). The Salaf understood the meanings of the passages of the Quran & the Sunnah & proved these meanings in the favour of Allah. However they would submit the knowledge of the reality (how of the attribute) To Allah. Imam Malik RAHIMAHULLAH was asked about the state of Istawa (Rising Above) of Allah on the Throne, he said Istawa is known but ‘how’ He ascended is unknown. The code of conduct of the AhlusSunnah wal Jamah is as the clear Quran’s verse:“There is nothing like Him.”-Quran (112:4)✔️The correct Aqeeda therefore, is NOT that the Attributes are completely denied as is the way of the Mutazila🔥(A Deviant sect), NOR is it to try to prove them completely as is the way of the Mumathila🔥(Another deviant sect✏Rather the true Aqeeda is to make an affirmation of the Attributes without similitudes/likeness✅SALAFIYYAH✅️_*
*Breaking down DEVIANT AQEEDAH OF SUFI/deobandis/asharis/matureedis🛐❌1️⃣They claim to follow imam AbuHanifa infact they follow him only in fiqhi issues, so they can fight with us that fold hands below navel or dont do Raful-Yadayen2️⃣The aqeedah of sufi/ashari/maturidi/deobandi is of sufi🔥WAllahu Alam from where they got this Shirk belief🔥Their aqeedah is of Mohammad bin Mohammad matrudi🔥If you know that matrudi is the fiqh who are wrong in the tawheed asma-wa-siffat of Allah.. They don't believe in every names of Allah, holding on only 7-8🔥They were wrong before & they're still wrong❌3️⃣Whilst in performing deeds they follow Sufi's 4 sub categories qadiri→chishti→naqshabandi→suharwardi👎🏻They're undercover Sufi🛐❌4️⃣SUFI/ASHARI/MATUREEDI/Deobandi claim that they follow 4 imams, but they follow imam matrudi in aqeedah & in fiqh they follow imam AbuHanifa, they leave 3 Imams as if they never existed!*_
*_WHERE IS ALLAH⁉️ImamAbuHanifah☝🏻AbuMutiAlBalkhi reported:I asked Imam AbuHanifah about a person who says:I do NOT know whether my Rab (Allah) is above the heavens or on earth⁉️AbuHanifah said:A person who makes such a statement becomes an apostate because Allah, the Exalted says:The Merciful has ascended above THE ARSH & THE ARSH OF ALLAH IS ABOVE HIS HEAVENS🔥I ALSO ASKED ABUHANIFAH🔥What if such a person admits, Allah is above His Arsh BUT EXCLAIMS:I do not know whether His Arsh is above the heavens or on earth‼️AbuHanifah responded🗣If he denies that the Arsh is above the heavens, he is an apostate‼️If the person apostatizes by saying that he did not know where is the ARSH of Allah, then by right a person who denies the Loftiness of Allah altogether is definitely worse than an apostate🔥ImamMalik🔥Abdullah binNafi reported:MalikBinAnas said:ALLAH IS ABOVE THE HEAVENS BUT HIS KNOWLEDGE encompasses everything. NOTHING ESCAPES HIS KNOWLEDGE🔥ImamShafi said:THE CREED which I hold is the same creed the MUSLIMS BEFORE me were holding, namely, the Testimony of Faith:There is no god worthy of being worshipped except Allah, that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah & that Allah is ABOVE HIS ARSH, above the heavens. He descends to the lowest heaven whenever He wishes📚ImamBinKhuzaimah a SHAFI himself said:Whoever DOES NOT BELIEVE that Allah is above His ARSH☝🏻Above His 7 HEAVENS & THAT HE IS SEPARATE from His creatures, is a KAFIR🔥Such person must be ordered to repent & disavow his belief or else he must be beheaded and thrown on a garbage dump so that neither Ahlul-Qiblah nor Ahludth-dthimmah be annoyed by the foul odour of his carcass🔥AbuBakr MuhammadatTamimi, a Shafi'ite imam of Naisabur said:"I do not pray behind a person who denies the attributes of Allah & does not recognise that Allah is above His Arsh🔥ImamAhmad🔥He was asked: Is Allah above His Arsh, above the 7th heaven, separate from His creatures, & is His knowledge & power encompassing everything everywhere⁉️He replied:'Certainly, He is above His Arsh & NOTHING escapes His knowledge. All of the above show that the entire Muslim ummah, in the past & present, is in unison regarding the belief in the Loftiness & SUPREMACY OF ALLAH THE EXALTED_*
Such wise words from our brother. We need to be united as a muslim ummah. We might have our differences but we should discuss that amongst each other behind the curtain instead of discuss it in public. And we must respect each other and shouldn’t mock each other for our differences in public.
Eating was more important to mawiyah bin hinda lanati rather than obey Allah Messenger pbuh till Allah Messenger pbuh prayed against that Maloon
sahih muslim 6628
Ibn Abbas reported: I was playing with children that Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya. I returned and said: He is busy in taking food. He again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in taking food, whereupon he said: May Allah not fill his belly! Ibn Muthanna, said: I asked Umm Umayya what he meant by the word Hatani. He said: It means he patted my shoulders.
@@tmffj hello shiite head… done sujood on ur clay tablet for the day..? wat abt ur tip of nose.. both palms.. both knees.. n ur toes.. did they touch ur karbala clay tablet also..? just asking….
@@tmffjmay the curse of Allah be on people who curse the sahaba (may Allah be pleased with them).
@@zakiahmad4024Maloon Marwan the Governor of Mawiyah bin hinda lanati announced sunnat of Allah Messenger pbuh is EXPIRED even tho the companions(ra) tried to stopped him but he didn't listen & did it anyway & this truth been hide from ummat what was the reasons behind Karbla
Sahih-Bukhari 956
Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
The Prophet (ﷺ) used to proceed to the Musalla on the days of Id-ul-Fitr and Id-ul-Adha; the first thing to begin with was the prayer and after that he would stand in front of the people and the people would keep sitting in their rows. Then he would preach to them, advise them and give them orders, (i.e. Khutba). And after that if he wished to send an army for an expedition, he would do so; or if he wanted to give and order, he would do so, and then depart. The people followed this tradition till I went out with Marwan, the Governor of Medina, for the prayer of Id-ul-Adha or Id-ul-Fitr. When we reached the Musalla, there was a pulpit made by Kathir bin As-Salt. Marwan wanted to get up on that pulpit before the prayer. I got hold of his clothes but he pulled them and ascended the pulpit and delivered the Khutba before the prayer. I said to him, "By Allah, you have changed (the Prophet's tradition)." He replied, "O Abu Sa`id! Gone is that which you know." I said, "By Allah! What I know is better than what I do not know." Marwan said, "People do not sit to listen to our Khutba after the prayer, so I delivered the Khutba before the prayer."
@@zakiahmad4024Mawiyah bin Hinda lanati had no respect for Omer (ra) cuz Mawiyah was sooodrunk he announced he is more worthy to be Khalifa than 2nd Khalifa Rashid (ra) by keeping quite son of omer was safe & secure exactly like nowadays in Saudia Arabia 😂
Sahih al-Bukhari 4108
Narrated `Ikrima bin Khalid:
Ibn `Umar said, "I went to Hafsa while water was dribbling from her twined braids. I said, 'The condition of the people is as you see, and no authority has been given to me.' Hafsa said, (to me), 'Go to them, and as they (i.e. the people) are waiting for you, and I am afraid your absence from them will produce division amongst them.' " So Hafsa did not leave Ibn `Umar till we went to them. When the people differed. Muawiya addressed the people saying, "'If anybody wants to say anything in this matter of the Caliphate, he should show up and not conceal himself, for we are more rightful to be a Caliph than he and his father." On that, Habib bin Masalama said (to Ibn `Umar), "Why don't you reply to him (i.e. Muawiya)?" `Abdullah bin `Umar said, "I untied my garment that was going round my back and legs while I was sitting and was about to say, 'He who fought against you and against your father for the sake of Islam, is more rightful to be a Caliph,' but I was afraid that my statement might produce differences amongst the people and cause bloodshed, and my statement might be interpreted not as I intended. (So I kept quiet) remembering what Allah has prepared in the Gardens of Paradise (for those who are patient and prefer the Hereafter to this worldly life)." Habib said, "You did what kept you safe and secure (i.e. you were wise in doing so).
May Allah bring the ummah together based on the haq. Aameen.
May Allah bless Shaykh Uthman and all the Muslims.
may Allah ﷻ guide and unite the sincere Muslims on the Quran and sunnah with the understanding of the salaf/sahaba 🤲🏻 ameen. there is no other way to unite the ummah!
How many groups under the Sunni banner claim they don't follow the Quran and Sunnah .......very few moments in our history we've had unity .
*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable*
*_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*
*Deobandi "ulamas" & heads were pure mushriks the deobandi akabireen! MUSHRIK ASHRAF ALI TANWI, THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI, HIS FAVOURITE DREAM BRIDE QASIM NANOTWI, IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI ANOTHER MUSHRIK WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ALSO THE WRITER OF FAZAEL AMAL ZIKRIYA KHANDELWI CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ANOTHER MUSHRIK!*
*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
@@muhammadsalafiahlulhadithignore this guy
Its wajib to call out these celebrity “religious” individuals when they start publicly conveying deviant views of the aqeeda (islamic creed). These individuals are learned and know what they are saying. You may talk in private and request that individual to retract or correct that statement but if that person doesn’t do that its a must to publicly criticize and show people the correct aqeeda. What good is private naseeha when the damage that these compassionate and celebrity “religious” individuals is catastrophic from an Islamic salvation standpoint. I support brother Daniel in exposing the deviance from those individuals.
We encounter significant concerns that needs addressing not on minor issues. For example, I came across a CZcams video wherein Brother Daniel provided a strong critique of Nouman Ali Khan's interpretation of a Quranic verse in which Allah SWT instructed the Prophet's wives to stay at home. Nouman Ali Khan's stance was that this verse was exclusively relevant to the Prophet's wives, while Brother Daniel argued that it applies universally to all women, given that the Prophet's wives should serve as models of virtue. Personally, I find that the evidence aligns more favorably with Nouman Ali Khan's perspective, primarily because the Quran explicitly differentiates the Prophet's wives from other women. Additionally, historical accounts from the Prophet's life (seerah) demonstrate instances where women engaged in activities outside the home, such as market visits. I acknowledge the potential strength of Daniel's arguments, i was not satisfied with the points he presented
The core issue doesn't revolve around determining who is correct between Nouman and Daniel. Instead, the concern arises when we intensively scrutinize these minor issues, disregarding the fact that Islam faces more substantial challenges. The commentary on the video was distressing, witnessing individuals pronouncing takfeer (excommunication) on Brother Nouman based on this matter. The predicament arises when scholars are publicly criticized, particularly if their opinions are so divergent that they could lead one to be considered outside the fold of Islam.
While it is important for muslims to seek perfection in the deen, it's crucial to recognize that practicing the religion flawlessly is unattainable. This acknowledgment holds significance when we decide to address the actions or viewpoints of scholars.
@@shuaibuabdullahi6327 I appreciate your thoughtful reflection on the contrasting interpretations of the Quranic verse presented by Brother Nouman Ali Khan and Brother Daniel. While I agree that the Muslim community faces pressing challenges that require immediate attention, the subject matter at hand should not be relegated as a "minor issue." Here's why:
Clarification on Brother Nouman: First and foremost, Brother Nouman is a da'ee, not a scholar specialized in Islamic jurisprudence or tafseer. While I find his work on the miracles and literary beauty of the Quran deeply enlightening, he is stepping into nuanced matters of jurisprudence and tafseer without offering a comprehensive context, reason for revelation, or perspectives from established scholars. This approach can be problematic.
Returning to Classic Scholarship: Before taking sides, one should ask, "What have our previous scholars said about this verse?" The likes of Ibn Katheer, Tabari, Ibn Abbas, and Mujahid have dissected these issues far more comprehensively. The Islamic jurisprudential schools-Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali-have offered their perspectives too. Shouldn't we consider the consensus of our rich scholarly tradition?
Questions about the Verse: The Quran and Hadith are multi-layered texts that require deep understanding, not just casual opinions. What is the syntax, the Nahw, the I'rab, and the Sarf of the verse? How does this specific instruction fit within the broader context of Islamic teachings? What are the implications on the inheritance by Prophets, the duties of Ahlul Bayt, and so forth? These questions underscore the complexity that defies simple 'two cents' opinions.
The Point of Contention: The real issue isn't whether women can go out for necessities-Brother Daniel himself mentions that his wife Umm Khalid goes to the market. The concern lies in Brother Nouman's suggestion that Muslim women should be at the forefront in jobs and education, which is not historically supported in the Islamic tradition.
The Role of Women: While you may view this issue as minor, the role of women in Islam is foundational. A strong, virtuous Muslim woman who prioritizes raising God-fearing children can be the pillar that holds the house. The evidence supporting this far outweighs contemporary misunderstandings of women's roles in Islamic history.
Questioning Brother Nouman's Intent: Given Brother Nouman's years of experience in the field, it's unsettling to see him emphasize a stance with scant evidence, especially at a time when there's a strong wave of liberalism and feminism attacking Islamic principles. Scholarly research largely supports Brother Daniel's view on this matter.
Comments Section Irrelevance: While the comments section can be disturbing, it's important to remember that the internet is rife with irrational opinions and even potential bots. That shouldn't distract us from the seriousness of the subject.
It's crucial for us as Muslims to engage in these discussions with the depth and nuance they deserve, rather than dismiss them as minor concerns.
JazakAllah Khair for initiating this dialogue. May Allah guide us all closer to the truth.
May Allah make ummah one. I agree with shiekh osman. Those things need to be discussed on private
May Allah bless both our brothers. I love both of them for the sake of Allah.
جزاك اللهُ خيرًا !
Love u brother for being so wise
May ALLAH Bless you Brother Uthman.. AAmeen..
I love them all for the sake of Allah.
Both of them taught me a lot
*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable*
*_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*
Eating was more important to mawiyah bin hinda lanati rather than obey Allah Messenger pbuh till Allah Messenger pbuh prayed against that Maloon
sahih muslim 6628
Ibn Abbas reported: I was playing with children that Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya. I returned and said: He is busy in taking food. He again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in taking food, whereupon he said: May Allah not fill his belly! Ibn Muthanna, said: I asked Umm Umayya what he meant by the word Hatani. He said: It means he patted my shoulders.
@@tmffj your point?
@@mwadoodsarwar9561 Maloon Marwan the Governor of Mawiyah bin hinda lanati announced sunnat of Allah Messenger pbuh is EXPIRED even tho the companions(ra) tried to stopped him but he didn't listen & did it anyway & this truth been hide from ummat what was the reasons behind Karbla
Sahih-Bukhari 956
Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
The Prophet (ﷺ) used to proceed to the Musalla on the days of Id-ul-Fitr and Id-ul-Adha; the first thing to begin with was the prayer and after that he would stand in front of the people and the people would keep sitting in their rows. Then he would preach to them, advise them and give them orders, (i.e. Khutba). And after that if he wished to send an army for an expedition, he would do so; or if he wanted to give and order, he would do so, and then depart. The people followed this tradition till I went out with Marwan, the Governor of Medina, for the prayer of Id-ul-Adha or Id-ul-Fitr. When we reached the Musalla, there was a pulpit made by Kathir bin As-Salt. Marwan wanted to get up on that pulpit before the prayer. I got hold of his clothes but he pulled them and ascended the pulpit and delivered the Khutba before the prayer. I said to him, "By Allah, you have changed (the Prophet's tradition)." He replied, "O Abu Sa`id! Gone is that which you know." I said, "By Allah! What I know is better than what I do not know." Marwan said, "People do not sit to listen to our Khutba after the prayer, so I delivered the Khutba before the prayer."
@@mwadoodsarwar9561 1st Kharaji/Shia/Rafdi Mawiyah bin sufiyan in Muslim ummat who abused Khalifa Rashid & Mandatory to abuse Maula Ali (as) in religious & political gathering in His Fironic era
sahih Muslim 6229
Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle's son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah's Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah's Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust.
I attended this particular AIM conference. Abu Taymiyah had a session a day before Daniel arrived. Abu Taymiyah spoke against Daniel on the issue of criticizing "a ruler" on celebrating Halloween. Daniel requested to speak about this particular issue. He was not given a chance to defend himself, as Abu Taymiyah spoke in Daniel's absence. So Daniel wanted to clear the air on this particular issue. Yes, he requested to speak about this issue in public, but not about clarifying things in private vs public.
Uthman ibn Farooq saying that we asked him to "clarify" in private, and he chose to speak in public is not the main issue. Though Kareem Abu Zaid steered the conversation in that direction.
Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.
@@aktcdclooks you have never left your hometown. Go to Pakistan, India, Turkey, some part of Russia, Central Asia, proofs and evidences in every 2-3 mosques
Saud cheer leaders =uthman and the wierdo abu taymiyah
@@user-sq5zf4nr7l I dont got time to answer most of these but female circumcision isn't a thing is islam gang
They’ve literally advised Daniel for a long time “behind the scenes” if you don’t know what’s going on akhi don’t make theories based on a certain person’s words. Saajid and Sh Uthman’s team have advised him.
I never understood why some of the brother handle disagreements in such an embarrassing manner.
The actual answer is very simple
because syaithaan's whispers, every human is targeted 24/7
may Allah makes it easier for us to always remain steadfast
"Tell My ˹believing˺ servants to say only what is best. Satan certainly seeks to sow discord among them. Satan is indeed a sworn enemy to humankind."
@@tacom0nsta658 asslamu alaikum brother what verse is that and what Surah. Very powerful
@@jbo1092 Seems to be from Al-Isra verse 53
*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable*
*_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*
Shayikh Uthman we know a very solid rule in our Islamic culture what is done in public must be refuted in public and what is done in private must be refuted in private. If Dr.Qadri publicizes his views that clearly contradicts our traditions, he must be refuted in public not in private. If you are refuting him in private, people would think that you agree with his views, but if you refute him in public you educate the public on why what he's saying is wrong and also you announce that you don't agree with him. Same goes for rulers, if a ruler says or does horrible things and you go shake his hands or you don't say anything about him people think that you agree with what he's doing and the burden would be on your head, but if you refute him and call him out like Ibn Tymiah did you have condemned him and the public would know your stance. May Allah bless those follow the truth no matter of the consequences.
mashaaAlloh, I really revere sheikh Usman for this
آمين يا رب العالمين
To his dua at the end
One Ummah.💕💕💕
May Allah bless sheikh Uthman, he's a real one.
Despite this, I still have not lost hope in Brother Daniel, and despite some of his mistakes, in the end they are not fundamental mistakes, and I hope that Allah will guide him.
You said you want to unite but that’s the same thing Daniel said let’s unite we have small differences of opinions among Athari, maturidi, Ashari but you said let’s unite upon the Quran and sunna then mention shiekh Albani, Usaymeen, Fowzan, and Bin Baaz May Allah have mercy all of these wahhabi scholars, but all Islam proved that they weren’t even united aqeedah. So you told me that you don’t know these guys but that’s not the issue. The issue is you told Daniel bring deobandi scholars and I’ll be more then happy to debate them. When I spoke to you, you said that it was Daniel idea to bring up aqeeda at the wahhabi ishtima, but Daniel came out with a video saying that this wasn’t true. You also told brother dilly from 5 pillars that it was Daniel idea to talk about aqeeda. So if you are truthful come out of your rat hole and became a lion like you pretend to be
The Prophet (saw) said the followers will gain/learn knowledge to win conversation with one another. May Allah protect us!
May.Allah.Unite Umma in Following Rasulullah and sahabah Insted of New Deviating Ideas!!!
Brother Daniel has my support to call out these Compassionate imams ❤
❤❤❤
May Allah preserve sheikh uthman and increase him in wisdom
Similar issues is happening in my country where by dua'at go publicly online putting of the awam into fitna of matters that are to be handled amongst ulaama
Lol 😂For all of those who think it is ideal if Muslim women are not financially dependent on men:
Would it be ideal if Muslim men were not sexually dependent on their women? For example would it be ideal if men could purchase (at low cost) harems of docile life-like forever-young sex robots?
How would you respond to Muslim men who justified this by saying such robots are necessary to give men true independence, such that they are not forced to stay in relationships with women who are rude, jealous, controlling, manipulative, fat, old, or ugly?
How would you respond to Muslim men who said that Muslim women need to "step up their game" such that men choose to be with them instead of a robot that is more friendly, beautiful, young, and thin?
The cop out answer is to say sex robots are haram, but there are other conceivable halal alternatives that would do the same thing: flood men with cheap alternatives. Obviously, such alternatives would weaken and ultimately destroy marriage because it takes away the dependence that men have on women for sex.
But that is literally what giving women financial independence does; it makes them independent from men. And that's why no society or religion ever did give women that independence, except for our current dystopia.
Sheikh uthmaan is great - however on the issue of Daniel, how he handled it, how is handling it even now, throwing a bit of shade, not a good look, not a good look at all. May Allah preserve brother Daniel, a true muhajid.
We need more Syeikh like Syeikh Utsman Ibn Farooq.... jazakallahu khair...
*_It is FARD/obligatory upon The True Muslim to affirm the Asma/Names & Sifat/Attributes of Allah, without committing:1️⃣Tahreef:To attach figurative & metaphorical meanings to the attributes of Allah, while denying the apparent meaning of the attribute2️⃣Ta'teel:Leaving & vacating🔥Negation/Denial of His Attributes & denial of His Self & Being. Denial of the real meaning proved by the Quran & Sunnah🔥Tahreef includes Tateel but Ta'teel does not include Tahreef🔥There are 2 types of Tateel:❌️1)Absolute Tateel: Which the Jahamiyyah committed:Denying all attributes of Allah❌️2)Partial Tateel:Which the Ash’ariyya & maturidiyya commit:Denying all attributes of Allah by Tahreef & affirming only 7 (Ashariyah) & 8 (Maturidiyah) attributes of Allah3️⃣Takyeef:To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are such & such or to put questions as to the state of His Attributes. The term "beghair Takyeef' means that the AhlusSunnah deny having knowledge of Allah's condition as Allah alone knows the state of His Self & His Attributes4️⃣Tamtheel: To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are like the Attributes of His creatures5️⃣Tafweed: To have faith that it’s not the apparent meaning which is meant but only Allah alone knows the meanings of the attributes6️⃣Tajseem:To have faith that Allah has a body. (We as AhlusSunnah neither affirm nor negate the attribute of body, since nothing has come in Quran & Sunnah concerning it & Aqeeda is a matter purely based on Revelation/Wahi as mentioned by Shaykh IbnUthaymeen RAHIMAHULLAH & Shaykhul Islam IbnTaymiyyah RAHIMAHULLAH✅So we do NOT affirm that He has a body while affirming his attributes). The Salaf understood the meanings of the passages of the Quran & the Sunnah & proved these meanings in the favour of Allah. However they would submit the knowledge of the reality (how of the attribute) To Allah. Imam Malik RAHIMAHULLAH was asked about the state of Istawa (Rising Above) of Allah on the Throne, he said Istawa is known but ‘how’ He ascended is unknown. The code of conduct of the AhlusSunnah wal Jamah is as the clear Quran’s verse:“There is nothing like Him.”-Quran (112:4)✔️The correct Aqeeda therefore, is NOT that the Attributes are completely denied as is the way of the Mutazila🔥(A Deviant sect), NOR is it to try to prove them completely as is the way of the Mumathila🔥(Another deviant sect✏Rather the true Aqeeda is to make an affirmation of the Attributes without similitudes/likeness✅SALAFIYYAH✅️_*
*Breaking down DEVIANT AQEEDAH OF SUFI/deobandis/asharis/matureedis🛐❌1️⃣They claim to follow imam AbuHanifa infact they follow him only in fiqhi issues, so they can fight with us that fold hands below navel or dont do Raful-Yadayen2️⃣The aqeedah of sufi/ashari/maturidi/deobandi is of sufi🔥WAllahu Alam from where they got this Shirk belief🔥Their aqeedah is of Mohammad bin Mohammad matrudi🔥If you know that matrudi is the fiqh who are wrong in the tawheed asma-wa-siffat of Allah.. They don't believe in every names of Allah, holding on only 7-8🔥They were wrong before & they're still wrong❌3️⃣Whilst in performing deeds they follow Sufi's 4 sub categories qadiri→chishti→naqshabandi→suharwardi👎🏻They're undercover Sufi🛐❌4️⃣SUFI/ASHARI/MATUREEDI/Deobandi claim that they follow 4 imams, but they follow imam matrudi in aqeedah & in fiqh they follow imam AbuHanifa, they leave 3 Imams as if they never existed!*_
*_WHERE IS ALLAH⁉️ImamAbuHanifah☝🏻AbuMutiAlBalkhi reported:I asked Imam AbuHanifah about a person who says:I do NOT know whether my Rab (Allah) is above the heavens or on earth⁉️AbuHanifah said:A person who makes such a statement becomes an apostate because Allah, the Exalted says:The Merciful has ascended above THE ARSH & THE ARSH OF ALLAH IS ABOVE HIS HEAVENS🔥I ALSO ASKED ABUHANIFAH🔥What if such a person admits, Allah is above His Arsh BUT EXCLAIMS:I do not know whether His Arsh is above the heavens or on earth‼️AbuHanifah responded🗣If he denies that the Arsh is above the heavens, he is an apostate‼️If the person apostatizes by saying that he did not know where is the ARSH of Allah, then by right a person who denies the Loftiness of Allah altogether is definitely worse than an apostate🔥ImamMalik🔥Abdullah binNafi reported:MalikBinAnas said:ALLAH IS ABOVE THE HEAVENS BUT HIS KNOWLEDGE encompasses everything. NOTHING ESCAPES HIS KNOWLEDGE🔥ImamShafi said:THE CREED which I hold is the same creed the MUSLIMS BEFORE me were holding, namely, the Testimony of Faith:There is no god worthy of being worshipped except Allah, that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah & that Allah is ABOVE HIS ARSH, above the heavens. He descends to the lowest heaven whenever He wishes📚ImamBinKhuzaimah a SHAFI himself said:Whoever DOES NOT BELIEVE that Allah is above His ARSH☝🏻Above His 7 HEAVENS & THAT HE IS SEPARATE from His creatures, is a KAFIR🔥Such person must be ordered to repent & disavow his belief or else he must be beheaded and thrown on a garbage dump so that neither Ahlul-Qiblah nor Ahludth-dthimmah be annoyed by the foul odour of his carcass🔥AbuBakr MuhammadatTamimi, a Shafi'ite imam of Naisabur said:"I do not pray behind a person who denies the attributes of Allah & does not recognise that Allah is above His Arsh🔥ImamAhmad🔥He was asked: Is Allah above His Arsh, above the 7th heaven, separate from His creatures, & is His knowledge & power encompassing everything everywhere⁉️He replied:'Certainly, He is above His Arsh & NOTHING escapes His knowledge. All of the above show that the entire Muslim ummah, in the past & present, is in unison regarding the belief in the Loftiness & SUPREMACY OF ALLAH THE EXALTED_*
I personally learnt a lot from Yasir Qadhi on many aspects of Islam and I learnt about the differences in sects by this scholar.
I thought no sects allowed in Islam
@@SpinozicTrollAbsolutely no sect is allowed in Islam. We shouldn’t be divided and we have to unite on Haq
Sectarianism is evil
Yasin qadhi is two face
I have to say that I love listening to brother Daniel. He's like no other!
He has a video out explaining his side of what happened on CZcams.
May Allah grant Daniel success in his work, and where he is wrong, may he be the first to correct himself, ameen.
I have faith in him.
Sheikh Uthman is 1000% right when we argue or fighting each other in public thats hurting the Ummah thats bad . We need to stop fighting each other and be united.
Baraka n Allah ufik Sheikh may Allah swt grant you to the highest degree of Jannah and all your family
Amin❤
I like to learn from the disagreements ikhtilaf can teach you alot when your not taking sides of humans but taking the texts they bring to support their argument
even classical scholars have different views that are often contradict each others. but at the very least they're all have agreed on the bare minimum.
fortunate were the sahabi. they too had their own ikhtilaf. but at that time, there's always The Prophet to help them clarifying things.
It seems apparent to me that some of these online dai’e LOVES confrontation and drama. I have now stayed away from these people because their contents don’t benefit my imaan whatsoever.
I agree that the initial step should be to discuss and resolve the issue in private. Even if Daniel decided to pinpoint the issues in public and as he claims, offered everyone he spoke against to discuss the matter with him and clarify their stance, but he did not get any response from most of them. Why are they not coming forward to discuss it in public to prove brother Daniel wrong?
It will cause a _fitna_ among the Muslim _ummah._ That's why it should be done in private.
This is not speaker's corner, this is about preventing a _fitna_ from happening.
If i have less followers than you and I publicly mock you and ask you to argue with me, will you accept?
Do you think Zakir Naik cares if small dogs bark at him??
Daniel Haqiqatjou is drifting away Muslim women from Islam. Those women just need to study Sahabas and Sahabiyats for themselves.
It’s the Saudi puppets that does that, Daniel is a real one.
you have lost your mind@@egoiisticprince7977
Brother Daniel is 100% correct in his requirement to discussion to be public. Same his demand with imam Webb. Because some opposition they will go from behind and say things that are inaccurate and also will use their platforms supported with oil dollars.
Subhanallah yes. It's everywhere on dawah scene. Here in Indonesia those things happening also. Subhanallah. May allah protect all of us from jahannam
The best person to represent Deobandi School in today’s time is Dr. Mufti Yasir Nadeem Al-Wajdi, whose work are really respectable and admirable in both Western English world as well as south Asian World - ma sha’ Allah ❤
Yes brother , You said it rightly
Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.
@@aktcdc plz. can you share the link where he said such things about Deobandi School
@@abdullahalrai Nontheless , such beliefs are'nt uncommon in books of their past scholars..
Alhamdulillah so happy that shaykh uthman is one of those who is keen on uniting the ummah! big ups shaykh uthman! barak allah fik!
It would be so cool to spend time with people like Shaykh uthman and share beautiful stories and figure out ways to unite the muslims and make our words unite❤️
Agree settle it among yourselves face to face. We the viewers don't want to know.
I follow the approch of take the good every da'es, sheikhs, uztazs have to offers and ignore the bads. We all aren't perfect. Be careful of egos and exposing the aibs of others. May Allah protect us and keep us in the straight path, grants us strength, peace and ease in our lifes. Aameen.
Muslims who aren't reverts often confuse between Islam and their own cultures.
There ia a fine line between culture or tribe proud and racist. Please decline the extreme.
So shaykh says Daniel should not address things publicly, but he has a problem with people who did not address people publicly, but this shaykh is addressing people publicly.
So according to this shaykh it's ok to talk about someone publicly if you say that you don't mean speak about that person first.
Cool cheat code!, No wonder he has to wear sunglasses indoors.
All praises are due to Allah..Hide your brothers faults is the sunna.
SubhanAllah. This is maturity in the deen. Lots of sects are claiming to follow the way of Salaf i.e ahul-sunnah-wal-Jammah, the first 3 Generations. But vast different opinions amongs them. Some are close to the truth and some are way way off and asking for clarification is the right and mature thing to do. For many years I was led to believe Imaam Ghazzali (ra) was not somones books I should read. But recently doing my own research I found that he was a highly intelligent man and devoted in worship and sincere. But some of his works excellent, some were were way off base and odd and some then some were a mix of both intelligent and odd statments. He had strong grasp of fiqh etc but was influenced by the wrong kind of Sufi Philosophy and He lacked knowledge in Hadith. But the near the end of his life he rejected it all and called the people back to the Quran and Sunnah. The point I am trying to make is that as a Ummah we need to be mature, fair and we need to ask questions and seek the knowledge out. Dont just blind follow with affiliations to certain Scholars, teachers etc.
May Allah bless us and open the true path that leads us to Him.
Uthman Farooq is back tracking. Naughty naughty !
I invite everyone to come and listen to the beautiful recitation of the glorious Quraan
The verse that says you can sleep with premenstral children is very soothing 🤦♂️
Send a picture of the whole page ur just taking it out of context read the quraan properly
@@Daily_QuraanOh profit what’s in your heart you are hiding from us ? FYI Surah Al Tahreem. Now read what was in his heart he was hiding ? From Al Tabari it’s quite clear it was his adopted son Zaid’s wife. Hmm get lost son zaid I want your wife too as if having so many wives and slave girls are not enough. Poor zaid lost his life and his wife both. Tafheem ul Quran is now studied by everyone not just Alims anymore.
@@Daily_Quraan Surah 65:4 As for those of your women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their term shall be three months-and also for those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED.
@@DoorbeenDornazar yh u c thats the problem the Quran is interpreted by people who dnt have knowledge who don’t have the understanding who think they can just interpret the quraan by its literal meaning no wonder u have doubts no wonder ur not 100% sure go ask a moulana n then cme back to me u think u can interpret a quraan hahahahaha u must be joking unless ur knowledgeable n in ur case ur not so cme back to me wen u have asked ur local imam. They even said a time will cme wer people will think they can interpret the quraan without knowledge.
Brother Daniel haqiqatjku is an asset to the ummah, may allah preserve him.
Sheikh usman playing dirty game by entering into all this.
Please don’t be bias’d lie this.
It’s not right.
@@AJ-oo6sv I am not a blind muqallid or follower of any personality like most Muslims. Wherever and whenever ppl from dawah work will come out and try to involve in fields they are not good at, defame Ulama e haq, I will stand against them. May Allah bless Sheikh Usman for his dawah work, incredible indeed. My respect for him doesn't mean I will go blind anywhere he goes wrong. I don't consider any scholar today as infallible. Neither do I agree with everything Brother Daniel says. But yes I do agree with 99% things of brother Daniel.
So what I think and believe I share my views. Ppl can disagree.
Sometimes advising privately is not enough because they will not change their mind so public refutation is necessary to stop people from spreading misguidance, GO brother Daniel.
Brother Daniel has our support
الحمد لله
Western hemisphere just lost a scholar who lived Islam, Fareed Abdullah r.a. may Allah s.w.t.a. grant him jannah el firdaws.
When Sheikh said, it hurts the dawah..
This issue cannot be compromised to discuss offline when the evil it is creating is great and disastrous for the ummah. And what is great mistake and what is small mistake-will vary from person to person..as they think.
Some may view destroying gender roles is great evil and whoever does that should be called off immediately by any way possible. Some may view other matters like this..
Some might also view sleeping with premenstral minors as evil...except for Mohammad and Allah Surah 65:4 As for those of your women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their term shall be three months-and also for those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED.
@@mattpowell6291 find a job
Mashallah.
May ALLAH remove these all differences and unite us all Muslims on one page.
Ameen !
the images of Halloween celebrations in Saudi made everybody lose it. It needed a real man to speak out with no fear of consequences. who today can read publicly (And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon (disbelievers)” [al-Maa'idah 5:44]
Are you making your own ijtihad here? Why don’t you see what actual scholars say on the issue?
We must stay close to the Quran, the Hadith and the sunnah
We are all worshippers of Allah, followers of prophet and his companions
Very well said! Stop trying to create clout, Daniel. It's very inappropriate to create public division like this.
❤️❤️❤️
Alhamdulillah, Daniel completely cleared the floor with you guys and showed you for what you are, causing fitnah and divisions in the ummah.
With all due respect to Shaikh Uthmaan and great appreciation for his Dawah, he has very little knowledge about the Deobandis
He is right let's not divide ourselves. Unity is the power. That's what kufaar wants divide and rule!
3 days ago there is a big debate between salafi and asy'ari in my country. Alhamdulillah, the debate ended with hugs between both sides.
One says this is correct, other says another is correct. When both opinions are presented public, people can decide which one is more appropriate.
It should be taken normally. Both are brothers.
This is the same guy who made a video picking on Dr. Zakir Naik. Dr. Naik gracefully replied to. He is not being genuine here.
Send the link
Why does Shaykh Uthman put on an Arabic accent when speaking English?
It's quite strange.
I've noticed that some Muslims seem to think that being an Arab, or adopting Arab culture, makes one more righteous.
I don't want to mention any names, let me drop two more. And let me include them in the video title to act as clickbait.
He didn’t make a video about them. So cope harder
@@enamulhaquejoy6962 this is literally a video with name dropping. Good bye troll.
@@youteubakount4449 What is your age? Are you even qualified to visit CZcams? Did you even understand my comment?
Birthdays and music. The big things in life 👌
Daniel Haqiqatjou 💓💓💓
mashallah
All respect when you said " even if we have (Khilāf : Dispute خلاف) between each other lets bring that offline " .
Exactly , cause this is so dangerous , this will create fitna between Muslims and slice the Muslim Ummah even more and many confusions would come up in future may ALLAH swt protect us .
Jāzāk Allah Khayr .
Sheikh Uthman could have done the same by doing it offline instead of making Daniel recite Kalimah Publicly as if he had done something that makes him fall out the fold of Islam 🤷
*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable*
*_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*
@@azamkhanAK50489*Deobandi "ulamas" & heads were pure mushriks the deobandi akabireen! MUSHRIK ASHRAF ALI TANWI, THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI, HIS FAVOURITE DREAM BRIDE QASIM NANOTWI, IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI ANOTHER MUSHRIK WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ALSO THE WRITER OF FAZAEL AMAL ZIKRIYA KHANDELWI CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ANOTHER MUSHRIK!*
@@azamkhanAK50489*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
Yes for muslim preachers to go and fight against each other is actually hurting the Ummah and bad for the image of Islam. Everyone should go and talk to each other in private. Not showing off who has the best knowledge of deen in front of the whole world. The real enemy is not your muslim brothers, but those who hate Islam and try to erase Islam.
exactly, well said sis
Shaykh "let's get Ummah together, however madkhalis are the only ones on right path" Uthman
Nice
Everything aside im proud that us Pakistanis are leading the way in dawah. Wish to see all these guys in a conversation with engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza.
Muhammad Ali Mirza is a rafidi shia
Bruh 🤦🤦
@itsme4080 hahah he's literally given hundreds of lectures in the mode of engineering methods. Fact is people who love sects hate him because he is unforgiving of sectarianism as every Muslim should be and in turn some guys don't even bother watching his lectures. He literally reasons with references and logic , the very thing you mentioned here.
Engineer 💀💀
@@ZaidKhan-su3ey grave worshippers & Banu umayya apologists 💀💀💀
Dawah drama, stay tuned for next episode
Syeikh Uthman and brother Daniel the best! May Allah unite this ummah and destroy those who sow discord amongst mosleem
I respect and love the way Sheikh Uthman gave dawah mashaAllah.
To be honest, the tone and the style of the talk in the conference, especially by Sheikh Kareem, to Brother Daniel was like the inquisition of a little child by his uncle or dad because of his mistake.
This was not really kind and rather awkward.
MaShaAllah, thanks this clarifies alot. The pannel in reference makes it looks like br. Daniel was ambush...
But Karim did him dirty by asking him to do sahada
Shykh Uthman with all due respect, you’re inconsistent. Why call somebody a super salafi? When there’s no such thing. You should have leave your drama to your mama.
With all due respect, in that panel Daniel really kicked everyone's butt and exposed how weak everyone was in their views even though everyone was trying to humiliate him.
Bruh Daniel has been exposed so many times. He is literally two-faced and has no good manners. He is like another Bro Hajji who lie or have no understanding of hadith. Just because someone can talk better doesn't make them right. Listen to the evidence and Daniel has nothing compared to people who are more knowledgeable.
@@musfiqurkashem346 that's all I hear fancy titles like 'people of knowledge' and yet these so called people fail to deliver a concise statement because they don't have one, they are beating around the bushes fooling the masses with their titles hoping that nobody will question them using fear tactics with their status
@@SPDRM literally making fun of women in Afghanistan for wanting an education and yet when women in India wanting to go to school in India with hijab he supports it. His wife went to Harvard... come on really. He speaks against other Muslims, but when it came to his wife she is self-developing. He says he is Jahil in one debate, but acts like he knows better than others and calls them Madkhali or bootlickers for following what the Prophet said. He speaks against Saudi rulers but speaking across the Atlantic under the protection of the kafir US government which he definitely has to be pay taxes to them which funds everything the US does like supporting Israel and bombing of innocent Muslims. Tell me when he is actually helping the Muslims suffering in Yemen. I don't see him promoting anything like that. Maybe he should use his platform for that. If he calls everyone a madkhali and bootlickers, tell him to stop bootlicking the US government and stop paying taxes if he truly stands for what he believes and let's see who the real bootlicker is.
@@musfiqurkashem346
He's like that one spoiled rich kid who gets good grades & has no discipline on how to talk & also thinks he's the main character or something sent to debunk all deviants where only his views are true
Ive seen some of his video ( daniel ) and i've always wondered does he ever study islam in a university in muslim country before ? Like saudi arabia, so many questions about this guy, i had even sent an email to him to ask his islamic degrees, no reply
Mistakes in Arabic language or recitation of the Qur'an is different to the mistakes in aqeedah and manhaj.
Uthman ibn Farooq's manhaj is all over the place
Alhamdulillah for Salafiyyat
Islam is not about empty slogans and names.it's about substance.
*Alhamdulillah for Islam
Appreciate your dawah Sheikh Uthman. But I stand with Daniel for calling out Madkhalis for who they are. Just like how you call out ppl of Biddah. In the end we're all brothers 👍
Daniel isn't even graduated from Islamic university. He's just an Irani guy hating Saudi posting memes on social media. Not a scholar whatsoever. That's why he doesn't have the wiseness of a scholar. To be careful when criticizing a particular country, a specific person. I bet he's encouraging muslims to rebel against their leader.
@@jinn6841lol except they are
@jinn6841 Daniel's a khariji n gives non muslims gifts !!! Dude do u mind sharing whatever ur smoking 😂
@@ryojs4286*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable*
*_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*
@@ryojs4286*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
This is completely undignified behavior for a scholar to engage in gossip, slander, and engaging with drama.
Problem is it will hurt their pockets if they don’t dispute online.
It's about the paper ....money Dawah is the new Dawah !!! We will use kafir platforms to debate Islam 😂😂😂😱😱😱😱.
Both these Ulemas don't charge even a penny from Dawah..
@@muhammadamjad2537 have you been living under a rock ?? They travel the world on first class flights , they have no job !!! How does their household survive on no money ??? They are collecting money from Dawah !!! They charge mosques for their Dawah !!! The best at this type of Dawah is Dr Naik !! He made hundreds of millions !!! . Now these Pakistanis are at it as well .
no need to do fitnah, better silent if you are not sure
@@stms6077 The Kaaba is a pagan place of worship .. why is there a moon and star above every mosque ??? The moon god hubal is the Cresent moon . The god of the quaresh tribe to which Mohamed belonged to !!! So he smashed up all the idols and kept the ones he prayed to. The black rock and the moon . Go and do some research .... Fitnah my arse .
wearing sunglasses inside is also sunnah.
can u provide the hadith saying this..? if u can’t… then u hv to go n apologise personally to sheikh uthman… u can ask him personally then the reason he’s wearing shades during this interview.. may Allah guide u..
@@SonOfCheepThrill being retarded is not sunnah
Wearing sunglasses inside is a big sign of being a TOOL
@@SonOfCheepThrill maybe you can smip
The guy has LV shoes on...also how much did he spend to send him and his team to UK? Let alone all around thw world...these are the tiny dajjals...people do worship these people...and people will call to these Al-Munafiqun on An Awsome Day
These things never happened before. Scholars respected each other. Had to humility to say “ I don’t know” never attacked each other. Isn’t the proper way to sit down and privately discuss your differences or any topics you thought needed clarification. Arrogance causes so much discord. The ummah is divided enough. Our deen is beautiful pls keep it so.
Sheikh Uthman should reflect on his wrong doings also . He's the one who started the Deobandi interrogation . Of course , the Deobandi Muslim brothers were simply reacting . Where's the unity when you're labeling all Deobandis as such and such ? They were asking for the evidence , but Sheikh Uthman couldn't provide any till this day on . Watch the interview in which Uthman is praising a Muslim by calling him a great scholar in Urdu . But that's not what he said about the same Muslim during his interview with the Dawah Man , he made up lies . May Allah swt . forgive him and all of us .
Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.
Go watch more soul train
You can never wipe out the differences. You have to unite with differences!
Goes against the history of Islam
@@mattpowell6291 Those who cannot correct their historical mistakes are destined for doom.
@@cmrafee2177 True but it was the founders of Islam who could not unite. This is why you have the Sunnis and Shiites.
He says that it's not about beoband, yet he puts a muslim brother on inquisition when he like dar-ul-ulm Deoband. He is not consistent in his statement.
He's throwing Sh Hakim under the bus. When he himself was grilling the most. This level of Jahiliyah does not befit the scholars. I hope we take a lesson from this.
But now Usman Khan is doing the same attack mode to Deoband. Just to please his friend MBS in saudia
His not correct not to openly enjoin the good and forbid the evil. If there is open sinning and mistakes, he needs to publicly correct them. Being all lovely dovey attitude is not correct. He doesn't have to be vile or rude to do this.
You are correct. If they spread their misguided beliefs then that is public and must be corrected publicly so that people know they are upon the wrong beliefs. Sheikh Uthman said that he don't want the non Muslims thinking bad of Islam because of the act of correcting them publicly only gonna make the non Muslims thinking that Islam is not a peaceful religion. The Sheikh shouldn't worry about what the non Muslims gonna think and just do the job of correcting them publicly because they are sinning publicly.
This soft approach to ahlul bid'ah is wrong
There have been harsh approaches to ahlul bid'ah in my country which didn't work but the soft approach done by some ulema made a lot of people come back from bid'ah. If you provide evidences from the Quran and Sunnah and give dawah with hikmah and give dawah with good character it works. Many popular scholars use their soft spoken approach to spread their deviant ideology then why can't we use soft approach to spread truth. You may disagree with me brother. Allah (SWT) knows best@@LearnTawhid
@@themaskedwarrior5540 I don't disagree with you. Using Qur'an and sunnah is not soft. What I meant by soft is sitting with them and praising them for their deviance.
Such a shame that it seems SHEIKH uthman is either mistaken in what he says or confused. Because what he says Daniel said or did are blatantly untrue. Very disappointed in SHEIKH uthman
Side issue but what’s with the “We are very clear..” weird accent 😂😂😂 Shaykh is from southern California
Farooq, it’s very strange that so many people within the same sect keep disagreeing with one another.
Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq ❤
He is respected and honourable.
May الله سبحانه وتعالى preserve him.
But if someone makes a misguiding video to his audience.. shouldnt they be clear to korrect themself openly ? What about the audience ? They just live along with the falsehoods they spread ? I dont really know if i agree, because if it is not a private mistake it shouldnt be privatly discussed. Idk its just my logic and intuition. In the end of the day, we as the viewer should check our sources after every claim you all make.
REMEMBER WE ARE JUST MUSLIMS AND DIVISIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED
IF YOUR PREACHER OR IMAM CLAIMS TO BE FROM A SECT THEN THIS IS NOT ISLAM IF THERE ARE CULTURAL ACTS THAT GO AGAINST THE SUNNAH THIS IS AGINST ISLAM
What did NAK said about music??
NO1 can touch Daniel Haqiqatjou!!!
You guys are another content provider for U-tube. Congratulations😂😂😂
Barak'Allahu feek, wise words.
Seeing muslim duaat making vidéos against other muslim duaat makes me feel sick !
May Allaah unite the Muslims upon the truth, but there's also no unity upon falsehood. Based on what I've heard from them, I never want to lend my ear again to brothers like Yasir Qadhi, Daniel Haqiqatjou, Mohammed Hijab, Nouman Ali Khan and some others, unless they come out and correct their errors. It's too risky to listen to them. I am free from them. Allaahu musta'aan.
SHaikh Usman is perfectly on way of senior scholars , if you disagree , talk to that person privately and solve that issue . Shaikh is doing great work for sake of Allah swt but confused , fame and money loving scholors distracting Dawah . Shaikh Usman do not have time for ignorence and arrogance.