Meet My New Dog! | Welcome To Sparky's (FNAF Fan Game)
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 07. 2024
- Get your Theory Wear! ►► bit.ly/3mbbDnj
Today we're are getting back to the good old animatronics. I want to try out Welcome To Sparky's, a FNAF fan game. What scares await me? Time to find out!
Find the game here ► gamejolt.com/games/wts/600139
Subscribe to GTLive! ►► bit.ly/1Oo7KH9
Check out the Reddit! ►► /
0:00 - The Witty Banter
9:49 - Welcome to Sparky's
54:56 - The Witty Wrap up
Need Royalty Free Music for your Content? Try Epidemic Sound.
Get Your 30 Day Free Trial ► share.epidemicsound.com/GTLive
#WelcomeToSparkys #FNAF #FiveNightsAtFreddys #FNAFFanGame #FanGame #MatPat #GTLive #GTNotLive
Subscribe & hang out with us every day! ►► bit.ly/1Oo7KH9
Follow us on Twitter at @MatPatGT and #GTLive - Hry
Today marks the moment where Art Theory began.
Was Picasso ACTUALLY Satan?
You're WRONG About Van Gogh's Art Style!
Can A Slap REALLY Produce A Master Painting?
LOL Brilliant! 👏👏👏👏😂
Is The Mona Lisa ACTUALLY The Mona Lisa!?!?!?
I'd be so ticked if he didn't make book theory, I would start a revolution
The FUTURE of Bob Ross's legacy!?!?
Hilarious, first of all, especially the slap bit, that got a solid amused exhale from me, GG, but I would hope that art theory would actually discuss the question, what makes art good? And, entirely separate question what makes art valuable? Or even who makes art valuable? There are also some interesting pop art with interesting stories that Matpat could look into. Adam ruins everything did a very interesting deep dive into the elitist nature of art, what/who determines the value of art, and the variety of art and how it is determined that some varieties of art merit a higher price tag than others, and questioned that system.
I’m so glad y’all had that art discussion in the beginning. It’s a good reminder that the presentation and context of any work is important. Without knowing the context behind Van Gogh or Picasso, and just seeing the paintings with brief descriptions, it’s easy to draw the same conclusions MatPat did. I also thought the same thing before taking art history in college, where I then learned that Van Gogh hadn’t gotten popular until after his death and he was trying to make a living. (And that Picasso was a horrible person, even though his art is aesthetically pleasing to me). I’m glad mirror Matt had the confidence to spark further discussion and ideas!
Thats the thing. Most of the artist will be popular after they died and also their "arts" will be expensive in bidding. Being an artist is really weird because they dont enjoy the outcome of their art before dead.
I have to say I am blind when It comes to artists, the only failed artist I know of failed even getting into school. If only Adolf had gotten some structure in his youth.
Also Picasso absolutely took ideas from and based his art styles on lesser known, often female artists, basically sapping them of their creative talent and taking credit for their innovations. Guess they didn't cover that in the museum lol.
Plus, people made fun of Van Gogh when he was alive and he was depressed. If he didn't love art, he wouldn't have continued.
It is unfortunate that MatPat was so impressed with Picasso's wide body of work and dismissive of Van Gogh's art without understanding how their lives shaped how they could explore art. Picasso's interest in art was nurtured growing up and from a very young age had a lot of opportunities to focus on and explore art.
Rather than saying Van Gogh copied other artists' art styles, it is more correct to say that while Van Gogh initially did learn and had and interest in art as a child he did not get to fully explore art until he was already an adult and his artist friends encouraged him to try out different mediums and styles. So he wasn't copying other's art style. He was still exploring art. And it's incredibly unfair to say that Van Gogh "copied other people's art style" when he was still exploring various art techniques and mediums before he found what he liked and suited him best.
While "riding on coattails" is unfairly harsh, I do somewhat understand why MatPat might have image of Van Gogh as he had multiple artist friends basically support him at various points in his life. But he didn't "ride on their coattails" so much as friends trying to support friends. Perhaps the only one that I feel may cause someone to lean a bit closer to the "riding on coattails" sentiment is Gauguin. As Van Gogh was more clingy to their relationship and worried (correctly) that Gauguin was planning on leaving him. And that Gauguin stated that at the time had been concerned that Van Gogh and his brother may have been using him for money. However, I also don't believe that suspicion was substantiated, and Gauguin and Van Gogh still maintained correspondence and Gauguin himself put out the proposal to form and art studio with Van Gogh.
But I mention Gauguin for 2 additional points that contrast to MatPat's opinions on Van Gogh and Picasso.
1.While Gauguin and Picasso lived together Gauguin encouraged Van Gogh to try a new technique following in Gauguin's art process of "drawing from imagination" to which Van Gogh, taking advice from a fellow artist he respected did try out. After taking some time to try out this technique Van Gogh found he didn't like it and it didn't suit his personal art process and returned back to painting scenery in front of him.
2.A few years after Gauguin's death there was an exhibit of his works in remembrance of him that Picasso went to and was heavily influenced by. His own interest in subject matter and art mediums such as ceramics at that time were directly influenced by the Gauguin exhibit. To the point that art critics still argue the degree of influence Gauguin had on one of Picasso's more notable art works that he created the year following that Gauguin exhibit.
However in defense of MatPat on Van Gogh, his image of Van Gogh was formed after going to the Van Gogh Museum and the information he got there. Just as the Picasso museum managed to portray only the good parts to MatPat without divulging his more controversial personal life and personality and therefore by the information he received while there was able to for a mostly positive image of Picasso the same can be said that somehow the information MatPat got from the Van Gogh museum managed to give him a negative image of Van Gogh.
Regardless of what Van Gogh's history actually was, it can be inferred that the way it was presented to Matthew when he was at the museum gave him a negative interpretation on Van Gogh's life. While one should try to find more information on a subject matter before forming such a definitive stance, as far as MatPat was concerned this information was being presented by what would be a reputable source, not simply an opinion one may read in an article or forum.
We have no way at how the information was being presented to Matthew at the museum, whether it be just his own negative interpretation from missing information or maybe a tour guide having an off day and misrepresenting Van Gogh poorly that day. Either way, as far as that one instance goes I believe MatPat had formed an opinion on Van Gogh based on what he believed to be competent information.
And I sincerely hope MatPat looks to learning more about Van Gogh and his personal history and how that shaped his artistry as well. And as a person who likes figuring out what makes things tick, I would hope that Matthew take a more proactive interest in historical figures to see beyond just the surface level of information presented before forming and in particular publicly stating such a strong stance one way or the other.
I think it's personally fine if MatPat has a personal opinion against Van Gogh. Or prefers Picasso over other artists. But if you're gonna publicly state said opinions then you need to be able not only to argue for your point, but also defend against the weakest parts of your opinion. As it is, MatPat was ready to impassionedly argue for his respect of Picasso and his distaste of Van Gogh, but just from minor rebuttal from Mirror Matt was shown to be vastly ill prepared to defend any hijinks in his opinions from severe lack of in-depth knowledge on either artist.
Wow, this was the most well-spoken comment I’ve ever seen on CZcams. Really gives you an idea that you should look at all points of views rather than being dismissive of the opposing
Wow that so long!! :O
As a student of Art, I thank you. Bringing this clarification to the forefront is very important.
Especially in the mastery of Art, many people didn't have the opportunities to evolve into their own style.
Be it their personal life, background, family history, the land they hail from or even the society during their time. Many factors play a role on what art will turn out to be with most artists.
I look at my family for instants. We're 8 kids, and we all did some art at some point. My bro had a weird tendency to draw like the "Biker Mice from Mars" or "Street Sharks" style, because those shows, plus the rise of Heavy Metal and Rock shaped his life.
My older sister became infatuated with ancient architectural works, so she drew way more landscapes and buildings than any other of us.
Next sister had a rebellious phase, thus a lot of her artwork was aimed as propaganda towards anarchistic demonstration.
My artwork was influenced by the loss of family members, bullying and trying to find a retreat or save haven. I was influenced by works of fantasy, like Tolkien, and works of horror, like Stephen King's books and Junji Ito's manga, which can be also seen in some of my works, as I like drawing creepy stuff.
The last of the bunch mostly spiral around edgy themes, anime and lastly fluffy animal characters.
So yeah. Even though we're all in the same household and grew up together, each of us had found their own style, due to how the world and other people, media and such influenced us :3
I do highly agree but off topic what is mirror matt? I saw a mentioned a few times but I can't find who or what it is
@@kaiperkins9292 Mirror Matt is the current gtlive tech, he took over from Chris after Matt & Steph moved & settled in to their new place
I did *not* expect all the Van Gogh stans to come out in full force on a GTLive video, but these comments are hella interesting to read ngl
As a soon to be art history major, the thought of Picasso being "under appreciated" did physical damage. I could name probably 20+ artists who are more under appreciated than both Van Gogh and Picasso and explain why they deserve more recognition. When it comes to Van Gogh VS Picasso though, as far as I'm aware, Van Gogh jumped job to job, did missonary work, but was then dismissed by the church authorities when he gave away his worldly things. It was then that he decided to take art seriously since he saw it as his own way to serve humanity like he was trying to do with missonary work despite him being poor. He seeked guidance from other art professionals, not to piggy-back off of them but to learn since he realized self-training was difficult. His artwork didn't vary as much as Picasso's because his life with art wasn't as long as Picasso's was. Both are amazing artists but Picasso was a man who was able to go to art schools without any worry and who lived a long life where he could experiment while Van Gogh did his work with whatever he had and on an allowance of Francs that his brother gave to him.
If there are any other art history buffs who read this, please add to or correct me if I got anything inccorrect! I get heated over art history and this is only from what I remember as well as a few quick searches to jog my memory.
Actually, Van Gogh did go to art school (several times) but he argued so much with everyone he ever met (probably due to a combination of his mental issues and later STDs) that he usually left or got kicked out. However, none of that means he didn't take art seriously or work hard to perfect his craft.
@@dreacranford Yeah, which, him leaving or being kicked from art schools must have hurt his reputation as an artist quite a bit since most professional artists back then usually had some sort of training to back them up. Matpat's take on Van Gogh "chasing clout" got me heated because Van Gogh also didn't like art dealings I'm pretty sure and painted simply because it was something he wanted to give to the world, selling his work for very little. I'm not a huge fan of Van Gogh but I believe his work and himself as an artist deserves more credit than what was given in the video lmao. Thank you for adding on btw!
Sheeeeeeeeeeeesh
art theory here we go!!!
Thank you for saying this!!! I’m just a Van Gogh nerd and know far too much about him, Theo and Theo’s wife Jo and I was so heated when Matt started saying he was a clout chaser😂
"Sparky" is actually the very first ever FNaF myth, so it's great somebody's finally making a fan-game off of him.
The og
Ah I remember being scared of him when the hoax was out..good times
Ye
The OG
@@daerbtac3968 that sparky would have a rare chance to appear in the bathroom in fnaf 1...? if i remember correctly
Dear MatPat, as someone who has raised goldfish for a good chunk of my life, State Fair goldfish need more care than what they receive.
These fish need big tanks with good filtration and a good aerator, not to mention they need to have a tank heater to regulate the temperature. And from my previous experiences from these games, these fish barely get the required tank size.
Because of the mistreatment of these fish, most of them end up dying early from illnesses like Ick/Ich.
Another thing is that these goldfish are commonly given to children who don't know better. So they'll take them home, immediately put them in a bowl that they will not survive in because they're too small. (Plus the shock of suddenly being put into new water without getting used to the temperature) And then a few days later, fishy goes belly up.
And that's assuming the child doesn't end up shaking the bag from taking it on a ride (Much like other Matt), shaking it themselves because they're a kid and they don't know any better, or from a long and bumpy ride home.
To anyone reading this who wants to raise a goldfish, (or any fish for that matter) do me a favour and make sure you have a 50 gallon or bigger tank, fill it with water and decorate it how you like, get the filters and aerator pumping for a good couple of hours and make sure the heater is at the recommended temperature for the type of fish you are trying to raise, then go to the pet store and pick out your fish, keep their bag as steady as possible during the ride home, don't open the bag and instead place the whole bag in the water and keep it there for a few minutes so that the fish can get used to the water's temperature. Then you can open the bag and gently lower the opening to let some of the tank water in, wait a few seconds, then lower the opening of the bag until your fishy friend swims out on their own.
Finally, gently empty out the rest of the bag's water and enjoy your new aquatic friend.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Mad props to you for raising awareness for the little mistreated fishies of the fair. You are the Hohman who speaks for the fish!
@@chaoticcordi9891 Thank you. Glad I could help spread the information!
Strawberry festival that i went to had the gold fish in bags not in tanks or anything. Also, depending on what color cup your ball landed in determined if you even got a fish in a tank.
@@chaotichealth7115 Oh yikes- those poor fish...
I shall be doing this
The slander towards Van Gogh when I've seen that emotional doctor who episode is making me feel something else 😭
Doctor who is fictional
As far as Picasso vs any other artist in terms of artistic ability or breadth, the issue is Picasso had a clear advantage. He was just given money to create. Someone just handed him money and said do the thing, whatever you want. Whereas Van Gogh and most other artists were just trying to make a living off their art so they had to find a way to make it profitable.
At least that's my 2 cents as someone studying to teach art.
And what doesn’t make sense to me is him claiming he didn’t do it for anything other than clout, when, mental health aside, Van Gogh had a CLEAR passion for it. And had been drawing since he was a child. The only thing I can think that is what mat pat meant is his change after meeting impressionist artists that he was FRIENDS WITH.
I am studying to be an art teacher and have taken many art history classes (adored art history since high school) and there are so many eventful art periods from about 1850-1950 that would blow matpat away! I think seeing the perspective of this historical timeline and how important Van Gogh, Picasso, Monet, and many more talented artists have impacted the art world would change our views of traditional artists like Leonardo Da Vinci, Bernini, Michaelangelo, etc. Both the famous traditional style of art and the different periods that challenged these views (Post Inpression, Harlem Renaissance, etc.) are both valid and important to our growth as a society. Even though we all may not agree about which artist we find to be the most important or impactful in the artistic world (got triggered by matpat's comment on Van Gogh, but he has every right to his opinion but I really think he should learn about this art timeline) each artist has made their mark in this world and has impacted at least one person and that is what makes art so amazing. I really do agree that we need to learn and see less famous artists because they are just as important as their famous counterparts, like I never knew Picasso had not only been a part of cubism but had a partner named Georges Braque (I hoped I spelt that right) and they worked off each other constantly. It came to the point it was incredibly hard to decipher who made which piece! It was also cool to learn that Picasso would create beautiful sketches of his paintings and slowly simplify them to where they look unrecognizable because he had to formulate how to change his subject into the style he used! Art history is just a lot of fun!
@@jordanmatthews9239 exactly! I also felt his… lack of understanding about how Picasso worked as a person (he did find Patrons/wealthily Americans) and that the man *really* knew how to paint his classics before getting into deconstructing them because with the advent of photography classical portrait artists were straight up out of a job, which is why a lot of the artists all sort of moved "together" in experimentation with styles and colors and etc (that and they would all hang out around the same places and talk about what they were doing.) I don't think Van Gogh actually rode on anyone's coattails as a creator anymore than MatPat himself does by making theories about games/other people's works instead of writing his own stories. (And I don't consider that a low blow because I feel like what he does and what fandom does to expand on a story or theorize about what it could mean is an important part of fandom. It's just as important as fan art or fic.) So it's a bit unfair for him to make that judgment.
(Also generalized European History + Literature major-specialized in revolutionary wars of the Atlantic but my other classes were all in Lit and general European History as it related to creative writing. So while I'm not at knowledgeable as you guys, the crossover between "artists between 1880-1935" and "writers between 1880-1935" is pretty much a close Venn diagram.)
@@SuperHothead14 Agreed. Was he a little overexcited to spend time with Gauguin? Yes, but Gauguin wasn't that much more accomplished at the time. I believe he didn't get really famous until after his death either. And all those artists swapped paintings and letters, etc.
Makes sense. Resources are the most important thing in art, and Picasso was given plenty of it.
The best prize I ever won at a claw game was my money back because the thing was broken.
lmaoo
Not to brag but *I* won a Snivy plush because it had a wire support in its tail so it was able to hang from the claw. *Again not to brag but I won a cheap doll from a children’s video game franchise so beat that!*
My brother won a nintendo switch on a field trip but the teachers wouldnt let him go to the game stop at the mall they were in to cash it in, so all he had was an empty switch box filled with tissue paper.
Fucking love that
Im really good at claw machines!!!!! i actually won a plushie this morning :) but like I have 14 plushes altogether from claw machines
I honestly hope that MatPat reads these art comments so that he can learn the truth about Van Gogh
Raised a brow on his take on van gogh
Im sure he would be implied to educate himself.
Yeah, I was so confused. I took an art history class and everything.
I hope he doesn't
As an aquarist, i was literally scared of what Mat say about goldfish at first... They are cold water, huge (if adult) fish, that require at least ~50-60 l (12 gallons) per one, and... you should keep more, in bigger tanks. And no, they shouldn't be keep in bags longer than from shop to tank. They are very dirty fishes, and need strong water filtration. Otherwise, they will suffer from ammonia burns.
50-60 l is way too small but yes, people dont keep their pets very good.
But that seems to be a think in america. :/
I'll say this, Impressionist art work was always about provoking emotion not about showing off technical skill, so when Mat said that he was not "impressed" by Van Gogh's work, you must understand that "impressing" the viewer was not the intent of impressionist art. As for Van Gogh himself he was in no way a "clout chaser" he was very much someone struggling to find their way in the world, thus when his friends lead him into the world of art, it was only natural for his style to be reflective of theirs. He was very poor so it is very likely that at some point he found himself in the position that artists still to this day find themselves in, where in order to justify the expense of creating art they must use it as a source of income. There is also contention as to whether or not the more infamous details of Van Gogh's life took place as history documented them to have happened, under modern understandings mental health especially of suicidal behavior there is reason to believe that he did not end his own life and there is documentation that would suggest that he lost his ear in a fight with French artist Paul Gaugin and that Van Gogh himself made up the myth of cutting off his own ear for the purpose of sparing his friend Paul Gaugin jail time for the accident.
I would like to add, Impressionist were not really concerned provoking emotion, but capturing a moment in the moment. Before Manet and mostly Monet, Landscapes for example can almost be considered fictional as the whole composition and planning of a painting was done in a studio and then painted (which could take weeks, to get every detail perfect). The impressionist(Monet) believed you could only show true reality by paining in the moment, the impression you have in that moment, the light, the people of that particular moment of the day. which meant they had to finish a painting before the light changed to much, which meant technical skill was less important. But they were still trying to catch reality. Technically van Gogh was a post-impressionist, who strayed from the capturing reality trend, you can see in his earlier work the influence of impressionist, This includes his artist"friends" Cezanne(have not yet seen his name, again forgotten) and Gauguin, but what made van Gogh different is that he tried to express his emotion and perception of the world to the viewer, which inspired (lead to) expressionism. Cezanne focussed more on the relation of geometrical forms and collor which inspired (lead to) kubism and Gauguin who left Europe and was inspired by the native art of Tahiti, it's simplicity and which influenced (lead to) Cloisonnism which is more symbollic. There are more styles that are said to be influence by these three but i thinks these illustrate the difference between each of the artist.
Also, something I found immensely interesting in understanding this period of art is the influence of Japanese prints.(I thinks that's the right translation)Because of the Japanese opened up a little for trading these prints were very new and not that expensive at the time, I believe. The simplicity and composition's of these influenced all three of these artist.
Lastly, if MatPat meant Cezanne and/or Gauguin as the people whom van Gogh 'copied' from. They lived together, or at least around each other, for a period of time so no surprise that some of there work is similar. And they worked with similar idea's on art and what it should be even if they were very different people.
@@MM-ni3yl good to see at least some sensible comments help explain, i haven't gotten deep in the video, i know not so much about gogh at all, half of the info
Yeah as an artist a few of his comments about van gogh "stealing" other peoples art style bugged me. You can't steal an art style because no matter what something will be different and I subconsciously (and consciously) "steal" aspects of my friends styles or tv show styles I'm fond of Gogh was in no way a "clout chaser" I'm glad someone called it out.
Thank you!! Finally, some good info.
And I mean, from all I've heard, he was just a really nice guy, total sweetheart, just had a lot of mental health problems unfortunately.
Matpat: no one reacts to game graphics like crazy
Jacksepticeye in last of us 2: absolutely losing his mind
I don't consider this "crazy", I consider this Jack just being... "Jack"
@Kora Waloschuk For me is not much the graphics, but the details. This is what gets me.
"LOOK AT THE REFLECTIONS!!!"
Honestly, I only care for how fast a game runs.
FACTS BRO
Mat, millions about to fight you about your Van Gogh feelings.
Second those words left his mouth, a big storm was comin'
This is almost as bad as Sans is Ness.
@@dreacranford probobly :(
He could get cancelled man
Wow, Matpat just casually dropping the super spicy take of "Van Gogh is a big hack," and breezing past like that's something that people would agree with. XD
Apparently, if you went to that museum, you would agree
I love how it isnt screaming like FNAF its just
*nom*
Mat you should 100% play the old game “Mad Father” it’s an indie horror pixel rpg game that’s honestly amazing
Ooo, and Ib!
@@hannatude agreed, Yume Nikki, Misao,LiEat 1-3 included. Pretty much all the classic ones... yeah LiEat is pretty new but it's also just so good. He should finish aoi oni first though.
You unlocked memories for me 😂
@@oreopudding3133 glad to be of service 😂
Mermaid Swamp, The Crooked Man, and The Witch’s House are also some good classic ones he could try. :)
mirror matt is completely right btw. giving live animals out as prizes is messed up. people don't go to the fair expecting to get a fish so they almost always end up in homes not fit to take care of them. most kids' parents aren't going to be willing to buy 100s of dollars worth of tank equipment to give a goldfish everything it needs so it ends up in a cramped tank and dies pretty quick
Pet fish can live a decent amount of years! But the average lifespan is cut very short as most on average barely live a year or 2 because of poor conditions.
Mirror Matt should play a game for vid while Matt watches
GOD and JESUS love you.
@@enochlavine That's nice
@@enochlavine ty
Omg yes that would be so cool!
@@enochlavine well I hate them so idc
Van Gogh died before he became really popular. His paintings used a lot of paint and took ages and ages to dry. His family kept them and sold them later when they were dry.
This voice acting is actually pretty soild
It's similar to the joy of creation...
wow
tjoc was the most polish complete fnaf fan game ever there's the fnati reboot but still
yes it is
soild
I’ve never wanted more to sit down with MatPat and give him an art lesson
I want to give him a fish keeping lesson..
@@wetube1112 that poor poor fishy
No "transferring temporarily" makes fish really stressed out and most people who own goldfish dont actually get properly taken care of and put them in small bowls or small tanks and thats animal abuse
Animal abuse is horrendously common with fish..it's so sad. If they have a decent filter system you never need to move them to clean the tank! Only do that if necessary or else you'll stress the poor thing out real bad.
@@testerwulf3357 mhm!
Remember we thought sparky was canon ? Good times good times
I want to go back to those days
According to the books, some can say he finally is.
Ugh I remember that those were the days
No i don’t remember those days-
i think i remember the spark thing, i don't remember at all
Omg I'm so happy that Mirror Matt knows the Doctor Who episode, coz that was like the only thing I was thinking of the entire time.
Mirror Matt?
@@genericrandomness3455 Probably the Mat behind the camera? Not certain though
@@sweetsongtalks yh mirror Matt is the Matt behind the camera
Time stamp?
Exactly. Lol
I'm so glad Mirror Matt told MatPat about Picasso's terrible mysogynistic personality because I was gonna lose it when he said Van Gogh was a hack then immediately turning around to praise Picasso right after. Bless you Mirror Matt for looking out for MatPat.
i love that mirror matt is sticking up for the poor gold fish so sweet haha
matpat in the intro is literally me trying to speak to my friends but i keep stuttering
Same
I refuse to believe that Picasso is better than Van Gogh. I will fight anyone who says so, even you, MattPat.
I’ll tag team battle with you, friendo
Same XC Van Gogh was so poor and good at what he was doing and had no recognition!
Just ignore it lol, everytime something gets on my nerves i let it go out one ear through the other, not worth it dude.
@@TiaTiaMamaMia hmmm, i wonder ho van gogh managed to ignore people because he couldnt let things go in one ear and out "the other" anymore hmmmm lol
Yeah but like here’s the real question, why are artists going insane
I'm so glad there are history and art buffs in the chat proving MatPat wrong because seriously unless you've done research or understand the life of an artist you have no right to criticise his path in art. He was poor, he found a passion late in life, he expressed multiple times that he hated having to burden his brother. Even his suicide wasn't likely because he always spoke that he would never do such a thing, but the inconsistences point more to him being murdered by some teenage bullies and covering it up becuase he was a NICE GUY. He got turned out of the Church because he gave away money while being poor and they thought it was innapropriate! Even the story about his ear being cut off probably wasn't true and he made it up to avoid the one who did it from going to jail. Granted, he may have had some old views or something, but he has always been better than what your slandering in this video Mat. His work is inspiring for people who wish to create but have little money and for people who suffer from depression. Also the "stealing other artists art styles" is a known thing in the art world and it's actually a good thing for artists to do when they start to really hone their skills because it helps them find what art they enjoy doing most. A good artist takes someone else's style and builds upon it until it starts to become their own. And I would love to see you try and create a piece of artwork that is "completely original" in style. Because you can't. You have to practice and practice to do those types of things, and considering he didnt get to go to art school, I think he did a pretty fuckin good job.
Everyone has the right to speak what they think. Not everyone's a huge fanboy/girl like you...
For the Van Gogh discussion, I don’t think it was so much that he just wanted to be famous. I think he just wanted for people to like his art, and for reasons he couldn’t understand his own style wasn’t enough. So he tried to collab with other artists to get more recognition and money to make a good living. For most of his life he was living on the money his brother gave him, who was his patron. In his home town he would try and trade his art for food or drink because he was scraping by. I think everyone wants to be loved and admired for the things they love to do.
Hate to say it but UR WRONG ON THIS ONE MATPAT, Van Gogh was self taught, but he was self taught because he had a passion for creating art. If he had tried to get into art to be rich and famous then he would have found another career after failing to get rich and famous off of it tbh, because during his lifetime he very much was not rich and famous.
Being self taught of course he'd experiment with various styles including those that were more popular, and including those he learned more of from his friends who were popular, cause he wasn't rich, and doubtless wanted some of his work to sell so that he could, you know, eat. None of that negates him having a passion for creating art - he'd have to have had it or he just would not have kept creating art. Art didn't make his life easy.
Lmao yea
I was wondering why that story was like that o.o
I had just learned about him in history lol
Yeah, love Mat, but as an art history minor who loves Van Gogh, I'm just like.... stooooooooop. This is painful x,X. Dude was literally named after his dead brother and always had a complex about his own identity. You wanna crap on an artist, maybe pick someone like DaVinci who was an absolute ego maniac who rarely finished his work--work he was hired for.
@@BladeRedwind yeah there are many famous artists through the ages who are arguably worthy of hate but. Man leave Van Gogh alone he was trying real hard and having a real bad time of it for like his whole life. I'm an artist, not an art historian, but as an artist who has struggled with mental illness like depression, what he managed is incredible.
@@emeralddarkness Dude, 100% all of this.
Im not gonna read all that text xd
Ay, we're back to practicing for Security Breach! MatPat's reaction at the beginning sums up FNaF pretty well.
When I was little I played a claw game and won a little stuffed bear with a camo pattern. I gave it to my cousin who was in the air force, and he gave me one of his uniform hats
I love the fact that they added “subscribe to coryxkenshin”
In defence of Van Gogh:
1. Man was dirt poor and needed money from his paintings, so he tried to make em popular
2. No one really cared about his art till he died so, he never even got big anyway
Exactly, it's marketability not clout chasing. Artist back then were literally starving artist unless they had a benefactor. Also Picasso was a GIANT creep who cause 2 of his ex unalive themselves I believe.
Also also he had an unborn brother that he was named after and in his childhood his mother kept comparing him go his unborn brother and really screwed up his mental health
he did sell one painting in his life
So harsh on Van Gogh.
Appearantly Picasso would autograph any piece of paper for money and would even sign fake paintings but I don't know if these are true.
Picasso was more of a clout chaser then Van Gogh XD
Not to mention that he basically copied Gauguin's style before finding his own.
@@pppkvb If Van Gogh was a clout chaser this would be sad more than anything else since it was probably provoked by his mental illness. Maybe clout chasing was a coping mechanism.
@@dreacranford Van Gogh didn't copy Gaugin, unless you are talking about the fact that he used inspiration from his work. Also you can't copy an artsyle, unless you copy the work itself, And you go out of your way To say that it is a certain artist's art To make money. And unless you are talking about picasso
@@pppkvb Yeah from what I've seen on the internet his "copies" aren't exact copies of other people's art, he did copy other paintings but added his own twist to them. Maybe the modern equivalent of that would be art challenges (mainly "draw this in your style" stuff) or fan art (since he was a fan of the people/art that he copied).
As someone who's won more than 20 stuffed animals (just that I can name from memory) yes you can get good at them, but you have to adjust to their rigged nature, and know when a place is naïve and makes them truly impossible (making it hard yet feasible is actually better as more people actually try).
Bro my art brother goes a bit crazy when he sees good art. Not right in front of it but when he describes it, he gets excited and wants to explain what so great about it. It’s so hard to describe, but it’s so much fun to watch and see what makes an artist excited about art.
YOO I FEEL YOUR BROTHER
everytime i see art it excites me especially paintings the feelsings you get from paintings
the colors, textures, shapes, etc etc
ESPECIALLY PHOTOGRAPHY ASKAS
especially when you siad he has a hard time explaining whats so great about it
there are SO many times i cant explain to my friends why a certain photo, art peice/painting strikes me as it is becuase you CAN feel that emotion they put and plus the way art (and art in general) is left for interpretation is really fun!!!
oh and my art teacher made us do interpretations for art and it was really fun!! i gotta say too the way art and philosophy goes hand in hand with each other also is quite intriguing :DDD
sorry if i am going to go on a talk about how art is amazing i think to understand too is that (this is from what i notie not to be mean)
the difference is like taking just a small glance and saying that the art is good vs observation (or is it observation sorryyy i really cant explain then :"") how ironic lololol) BUT STILL I FEEL YOUR BROTHER!! i can go on and on talking about this but id rather not because yea B)
but still have a great day!! to whoever reads this too! :D
I *know* you’re not throwing shade on Van Gogh. He’s an inspiration and he deserved so much more than life gave him, and the rumors (the ear thing, for example) that have been accepted as factual history about him are awful.
And also his suicide. There were a lot of plotholes in the exact happenings. There's a really likely theory covered on buzfeed unsolved that makes more sense, which was Van Gogh covering up his friend's brother shooting a gun at him
@@ttrevina yeah I think there’s also one about some neighborhood kids accidentally shooting him. Bottom line there was more to his life and well death than we’ll ever know...
How well were things documented back then?
@@kodered59 One of Paul Gauguin’s letters stated “…unfortunately [Van Gogh] went raving mad and for a month I had to endure the fear of a fatal and tragic accident…”
He wrote that Vincent went into a manic state and came at him with a razor, but snapped out of it before he injured his friend and instead took off, eventually giving in to his impulse to self-h*rm.
That’s according to “Gauguin’s Intimate Journals”. You can google it for more info.
Oh man I remember when Sparky was rumored to be a secret animatronic in the first FNAF, it was neat and I wish that Scott had done some call out to it. Maybe he did and I just missed it
I kinda feel like Fetch is sorta a reference to Sparky, they do look pretty similar. Though it could be pure coincidence.😅
I love the comments just dragging MatPat's art takes, you guys give me life
I completely disagree on Van Gogh being a hack. Some of his really well known works like Starry Night arent a big deal to me. I saw his painting Irises in person though and let me tell you that I find to be a masterpiece far more than the mona lisa which ive also seen. Its amazing. Its huge. You can see all the brushstrokes. Van Gogh didnt make money from his art barely and have any fame until far after his death. That man made art for the love of it.
Picasso Ive never been a huge fan of.
I would love to watch a vid of just " The witty banter," in the beginning of the video.
THANK YOU! Right?! 💯 👏 🙇♂️
@@jtkelley1873 Right!
That was basically the GTeaLive series
I would love it, pleaseee, make it happen 🥺
I'd listen to a podcast like that
Okay, but this game's plushies are adorable. Sparky the Dog with his tongue poking out the side? I'd buy that.
Sparky with floopy ears and a head tilt x dies of cuteness x
The jumpscares in this game are _incredible._ Like, I'm talking heart-stopping incredible.
No kidding, I just saw a jump scare and my heart STOPPED - 🥲👊
Completely disagree. Worst jump scare I’ve seen in awhile.
@@gavinthegreatgavinthegreat97 i think they tried to emulate the JoC style jumpscares.
They aren't as good as JoC, but most are still pretty nice.
I love how Matt Pat is surprised that the security guard who has to go around this dark building if he hears any noises at night has a flashlight
JUMP SCARE LIST (it me):
0:05 (that's the weirdest NOM sound I have heard from an animatronic)
31:19 (reminds of Peter Parker from Into the Spiderverse eating a sandwich... kinda)
33:41 (bless you, I think it sneezed)
34:59 (idk about you guys but my ears are really starting to hate all this ringing)
36:13 (I like how that one always raises its hand before it brutally punches you)
37:04 (he just prioritized the wrong thing)
38:17 (I think its safe to assume that the plushy is usually accompanied with the guy from behind)
40:46 (that was an awkward couple of seconds lmao, getting better though!)
42:54 (they do look kinda similar, I'm getting the pig is bulkier while the car is more compact)
That last run made me super anxious, but we both made it through! See you guys next time
Ooooh boi! Looks like this is a trial and error kind of run!
I like this jumpscare list! Especially the descriptions! EDIT:the game advises to have the plushies as Low priority but he keeps it high...
This was NOT the video I expected to start getting hot art takes.
28:58 Mattpat shows how much he knows about fish.
This episode is filled with so much discussion other then the game and I love it! I am shocked with how little the goldfish are talked about to be honest, because they aren't treated well and fairs target audience is children and pet stores aren't much better at giving care to their fish or giving helpful advice to new or younger people. This of the stories you've heard of "Oh I had a fish when I was little and it only lived a week" a week isn't the life span of any fish, its the improper care that ends up killing them. Anyways, I love the video but I wanted to add my thoughts on the comment!
11:00 catch some grown adult saying I just couldn’t turn down Chuck E. Cheese you can’t
well maybe hade a fucked up childhood and this place was one of the few good parts of his childhood
I have a grown adult sister that would say that if she was offered.
Fun fact, a friend and I who were 17 at the time we going to go to chuck-e-cheese for shites and giggles. However, we had to be 18 or couldnt go in without adult supervision. Fun times. XD
a lot of youtubers if chuck e cheese offered to sponsor them would most likely say " I just couldn’t turn down Chuck E. Cheese" if the money is right, people will do it
@@woteveruk1 yeah but they aren’t really genuine about it
Petition to restart GTea Live but its just the Matts discussing their opinions on artists and their fame.
🙋🏻♀️
signed
By the way, those goldfish in bags are miserable and dying. Goldfish need a lot more space than, say, a beta (which can live in a tiny container) and they also need fresh air. Unless those fish go straight into aerated tanks as soon as somebody wins them, they're all going to die within a couple days.
People's treatment of goldfish is honestly terrible. As someone who has cared for them in the past, the mainstream idea of goldfish is so wrong. One needs at least, AT LEAST, a 20-30 gallon tank. Each additional one requires an additional 10-15 gallons. And a proper filtration system for all that. The tank needs real water plants to absorb nitrates and nitrites along with a healthy bacterial colony in the tank and filter. Frequent water changes are NECESSARY and must be carried out properly. This is a far cry from the tiny unfiltered bowls and tanks people put them in. Generally people think goldfish have short lives, but they can live up to 20 YEARS and should at least be pulling over 10 if treated right. Basically, none of those state fair goldfish are going to get proper treatment because no one knows how to care for goldfish. It makes me sad because fish are such beautiful creatures that deserve good lives.
Agreed. Bettas get a bad rap too because they ‘live in puddles in the wild’ maybe but those puddles go for miles. Goldfish are filthy fish and absolutely need filtration.
When you come in looking forward for a FNAF fan game and it begins with an art debate that makes you question everything you've known about art history. 😂
as an artist i am LOVING this witty banter
Right?😂
Same. Tiny bit concerned that he called van Gogh a big hack, but, I assume it's all in good fun-unless several art teachers and at least one Professor were lying to me.
@@Crisjola they weren’t lying. Van Gogh wasn’t a hack, he started drawing and painting at a young age and had a passion for his art.
@@hannatude I thought so. I know Picasso was (very) classically trained. But alas, I took more history and Lit classes than I did art history classes (took a fair few number of art courses on my own time, however) so it felt really jarring to have MatPat say what, from what I've read/been taught, was basically dead wrong and based on what *he* thought the museum meant/said about Van Gogh.
Now there is an artist (modern, I think? Like in the 1950s forward but I honestly can't remember and only know him because my grandmother likes him) who both my mum and I *hate* because he "found a style that worked for him" which was basically stick figures and poorly abstract versions of houses and such, whose name utterly escapes me. His Museum straight up also says "oh yeah, he couldn't do that and failed at having a grasp of classical style art/sketching so he only did this and made himself famous by getting a Patron" and after we found that out-after understanding how/why everyone from the impressionist to anyone doing cubism or any experimental art form playing with light, color, or shapes-we didn't even finish the museum and just turned around and left like 1/3 of the way through (unheard of for us.) I'll post an Edit when I remember the name/get a text back from my mum because it's gonna drive me nuts.
And honestly if the museum hadn't been so blunt about "he really couldn't draw and stopped progressing with his tutors in art after YXZ age" we would've assumed that his style was more a "modern art choice" that was based on *something* other than "literally wasn't talented enough to do any other form of art than what an untrained 7-10 year old could do (and one who possesses zero natural talent.)
@@Crisjola I mean, I can think of several artists who I feel match that description, but that’s more because I hate 80% of abstract art and not really a reflection on an artist’s skill or talent in general.
Matpat being literally wrong about Van Gogh for a whole 10 minutes •__•
Ykw, I was going to say something rude. But I'm not anymore, your pfp says everything.
*Protect Van Gogh from MatPat at all costs*
I wonder if he'll ever check out ib. A horror game from 2013. It's an RPG. A real classic.
What is it
Maybe one day he’ll get into the big Rpg maker games like Ib, Mad Father and Corpse Party
@@Luxan_Grey mad father is a name I hadn’t heard in a while. *Certified hood classic*
Don't forget Witches House.
Wow Ib. I haven't heard of that game in forever.
it took them long enough, but they finally did it, they made a sparky fangame.
I love your name lol
I think today’s “witty banter” is a sign that the unknown fourth theory channel should be History Theory, it would be historic.
I suggest matpat listens to the musical “Starry” if he wants a better understanding of Van Gough than what he got at the museum.
I'll have to check it out too! I've only know a little bit here and there and the doctor who episode which i know is a work of historical fiction xD
Wow I’ve been watching mat for so long.. almost 2 years to revisit him. He hasn’t changed much to say the least. I’m glad he still has his peeps :]
Stephanie isn’t here anymore 😔
@@Sohangezoe WAIT HUH?
@@mossrinnn She left GT Live since she felt like she was more of an accesory, their personal life seems pretty good tho
@@mossrinnn They're still married and with Ollie! She just won't be present for Livestreams anymore as she wanted to move on. She's still around, just behind the scenes! They also moved so Chris is no longer with them and Jason and Amy are still on the team, just back in LA. Now we have Mat!
@@ThatOneGuy-nm7ij She didn't leave necessarily because she felt like an accessory, it was just a side effect of being the co-host and everyone reassured her that it wasn't true. She left because she couldn't divide her time/attention between her responsibilities any more than she had to. Doing all that work for three channels and merch AND raising a kid, these stretched her thin and something just had to give (I remember Matt himself saying she does more than him for their business).
Reminds me of a time when we all used to be scared of fnaf1 good times
When u eat but dont wanna take a bite with a fork cuz u know there will be a jump scare so u dont wanna be stabed
@@riddlemethisbatman or u have a hot drink and don't wanna get burned
@@Hatty_Bee ye but i never accualy thought of pausing lol so id be waiting for 5 min for the jumpscare
@@riddlemethisbatman . . . why didnt i think of that-
On the claw game discourse: most are not super rigged though some are. Id call myself a claw game professional. Theres a trick to lining up the claw right to grab stuff. Boxes are hardest to grab but the stuffed animal games are super easy when you know the trick. Youve got to check not just in front but check the alignment from the side. You should also go for the prizes that look loosest and easiest to grab. A lot of times you can grab a couple loose ones to shift the items are get to prizes you want that are trickier to get. My dad taught me all the claw game tricks as a kid.
I love love love how new Matt has so quickly become more comfortable talking during these videos. He’s so funny. 😂💖
Cheese is technically a loaf of milk.
r/thanksIhateit
**angrily likes**
I just watched a video of people dropping random bombs like this on people
Wood is a loaf of paper
Butter is technically toast paint.
Next in the peepachu line, a wearable animatronic, Springlock Peepachu if you will. Then his final form MatTrap
Then they’d have to make “StephBear’s Family Diner.”
Love these videos, but I think one of my favorite parts is your back and forth with Mat (or Matt?) They're always a delight, and their chill is a nice complement to your exuberance. Keep it up, and can't wait for Stephanie to return as well! ♥
So... Van Gogh trying out different art styles from his friends is a crime? Smh
It’s killing me how Sparky just pops up and cold clocks you in the face
i love it.
I get where Mathew is coming from with the paintings as usually I'm not big on art. HOWEVER even though I don't freakout I will defend starry night as I do really like that painting
19:11
This reminded me of a story I heard from a Walmart employee, a wholesome one, that's for sure.
Apparently, there was this girl, who if I remembered right, had cancer. And in the hospital she was recovering in, they had one of these claw machines.
She would play the claw machines every day for ages, and she. Got. Amazing at it.
She eventually recovered from her cancer, and kept her claw machine skills with her.
And she would go to, if I remember right, the Walmart this employee went to, have a sum of money, and spend it ALL on the claw machine they had, and she hardly if ever missed one.
She would leave the store with trash bags full of stuffed animals from the claw machine.
And she would donate them to children's hospitals for all the kids to enjoy.
Warms my heart.
Niceeeeeeeeee
I love when Mirror Matt is spicey 😂😂
The best thing (and only thing) I ever won from a claw game was...a stripper bear from a bowling alley when I was 8. 😂
mirror matt has been chaotic this past week, i'm loving it lmaoo
The random conversations throughout this game are the best things ever
i won a goldfish at a fair game as well! it lived for over a year until my grandma overfed it while we were on vacation 😭 rip swimmy i miss you
Every day, we stray further away from steph on the couch
Don't do this to me man.
Why did I get so happy when I read the title 😅 and then I realized it's just a fnaf fangame
lmao
This happens to me a lot....sadly it doesnt get better.
A game: is beautiful MatPat: NO... NO IT'S TIME TO STOP
I love how sparky just decks you when he jumpscares you
Ay, Matpat, remember when you said that what you didn't like about the youtube algorithm was that it only continues to offer you things you agree with or things that you have historically liked? And how you said that it's necessary to challenge expectations/conventions/personal beliefs/points of views so that we will grow as people? It seems to me that is exactly what Mirror Matt is doing, and frankly, he deserves kudos for embodying a virtue that you have previously extolled on your channel. What has gotten into Mirror Matt today? Justice! That's what! Statistically, state fair goldfish are more likely to go to more careless or younger, more inexperienced child-age pet owners. That's the target demographic of those state fair games, and that's the majority type of recipient of a state fair goldfish. The treatment of those goldfish, is unlikely to be humane. Matt was not saying it is impossible that state fair goldfish will have good lives, merely that it is unlikely or rare that they would. You and Steph's treatment of animals is unfortunately more likely to be the outliers, rather than the norm. Human treatment of animals has been statistically and historically very poor. Heck human treatment of other humans reaches new lows frequently in human history. How much more worse will it be towards animals? Just take a peek at the meatpacking industry alone. You should laud Matt for challenging common perceptions. It is as you said (in passing in this video), we are learning and growing as people. That's a good thing, though to be fair, I understand that there can be some..."growing pains" in the process of learning.
I really appreciate this comment. I am constantly having to remind myself that if I expect others to be open minded and willing to change their views, then I must do the same. Matt and I are very similar, so it’s easy for me to justify when he’s wrong, but being reminded of the responsibility of change laying on everyone, really keeps me in check. I’m glad you respectfully pointed out that he needed to keep his own values in mind.
Luckily he hasn't noticed the 4th bunny on the shelf behind him
I don't know about you but I find Van Gogh's style absolutely beautiful. Starry Night is one of my favorite paintings. As for what Matt said (Van Gogh looking for fame/copying other artists' work)... As many comments said here, Van Gogh had a clear passion for painting and didn't do it only for money and fame. I can't blame the man for wanting to earn money and recognition through his art as well as wanting to create. As for the plagiarism stuff, that's frankly part of the learning process. It's not the best thing but it's reality. Van Gogh was self-taught, and while learning how to draw/paint it's very common for people to copy other people's work before they develop their own styles. Just like most artists I did it too and I've never been ashamed or regretful of that, because it helped me learn.
Also: Picasso was a great artist as well, but out of the two, Van Gogh was always my go-to. He was horribly mentally ill, had a really difficult life yet never gave up on his passion for art (if that isn't inspirational I don't know what is). Picasso was probably like that too to a certain extent but I didn't look too much into his life.
Oh GOD matpats finally gone insane....... he has surrounded himself with golden pepachus!!!!!, weve... we've, finally lost him
You hear a door click when Sparky comes and goes.
Mat you have been one of my favorite CZcamsrs you hurt my feelings with that Van Gogh comment lol
when mat started praising picasso the "oh no. oh no
oh no nononono" automatically started playing
Mirror Matt is killing it today, him flummoxing Matpat is fantastic content 😂😂
GT Live just means we watch him in live action now, doesn't it?
23:54 why did he legitimately sound super shocked?
Best win on a claw machine: 2 stuffed animals in one claw.
Second best: "High quality headphones" that were already broken in the box.
When the intro features MatPat almost breaking brand safety, you know it's gonna be fun.
Screw Sparky's; do Art Theory under the guise of that Dr. Who Episode.
I can't be the only one who is always filled with happiness when they hear the intro!!
It is just me.... Ok then....
It’s not only you
Don’t worry
You are not alone :>
me too, all four channels' intros are bangers
no, me too
every theory intro fills me with happiness
Last time I was this early, there was only one theory channel ;-;
Oh my gosh, the goldfish story was a reminder of when my (very small) high school decided to have a very easy game to win goldfish. My parents (and many others) were not happy that one of the few activities high schoolers decided on including was one to give out fish they didn’t want to care for.
7:30 Spoiler Below.
I've seen that episode about 10 times and the look of awe on his face as the curator describes him as the most talented artist in all of history is still so powerful. I think Matt has lost his marbles here. Surely a TV show about a time-travelling alien protecting humanity is a better resource than the Van Gogh museum and whatever Matt read between the lines for.