CycloTech First Flight
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- Check out the first flight of the CycloTech technology demonstrator. The Austrian company based its "CycloRotor" propulsion system on the Voith Schneider Propeller design, which has been used in maritime applications for decades. CycloTech believes it could be used to create compact, maneuverable small drones and air taxis.
I wonder how they work calmly and effectively in that lab with the dramatic music so loud?
all former Red Bull lab techies, nothing phases these guys anymore
After a while, you don't even hear it anymore.
Earplugs, or ANC headphone.
@@visible2anyoneonyoutube under rated comment
😂🤣
Incredible! I just wish the music was louder.
🤣
HUH?????
I wish it was music.
👂 WHAT??
🤣🤣🤣
Finally! I'm always telling people, "You know what these educational/science CZcams videos are missing? Loud electronic music."
Sadly, that was actually the motor prop’s sound note.
Not a single second of that track could be considered electronic music.
Quit stealing other people's comments..
BAZZZOOWWWWWWAA
They put it there to mask the noise the vehicle/drone makes
Now we can make 4 smoothies at once, this is a true break through
😄...on the way to your house!! 😆
Lmao
🤣🤣🤣😂😂
It looks great. I wish I could hear it without the extra background noise.
ok, I'll do my best impression of the deafening noise that you would hear.
WHUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
What did you say? I can’t hear you!
Yeah I want to know how it compares to a quadcopter that has to lift the same amount of weight. If these are more quiet then it’ll be a huge step towards assimilating them into cities.
@@Dmanning11 *Drumming intensifies*
@@mattd1188 That's better.
Imagine all the hard work that has gone into this. Then they make a video and everyone roasts them for the music in it 😂
@@stp4tiger exactly. It's 100% hype 0% on why this iw even worth doing.
I would like just 1 reason why/how it's anything but over-complication for the sake of it alone.
Maybe you don't see that and that's why you criticise those who do (and have more idea how truly absurd the carry on is).
Think about it or point out just 1 significant advantage for me over existing simple props or turbofans/jets please.
If the product/technology was worthwhile or captivating, no one would be commenting on the music. It's because the music was so intense and the actual performance so lackluster that people are commenting on it.
Everbody wants to build a better mouse trap...
@@nommy8599 what struck me is that the way these fans are attached, it would be easy to have wheels slip on them and use the same drive train to operate as a ground vehicle.
I know too little about their efficiency, noise level, etc. It is more compact than other flying vehicles for sure.
@@vessbakalov8958 yeah good point about the wheels. Might be able to put some thin ones there. Would need a lifting mechanism to spin them for takeoff though. And gearing for any power (pretty different rotation speeds for land vs flight). And suspension. And steering. But maybe good to get into garage something.
IDK about other stuff either and do wonder if a similar size vehicle with same lift could be done with props.
My impression was things are made larger with wing for efficiency, but maybe these are good for compact lift. Would've thought they'd say if it was compact and efficient but IDK.
I want to see the system in a smoke tunnel. Very curious of the fluid dynamics going on here.
The Voith Schneider Propeller design has been used in tugboats for a few decades. The pitch varies as the blades travel around the cycle. Because of this the thrust vector can be in any direction perpendicular to the rotation axis. This can be very advantageous for tugboats that can move in any direction. The only advantage that I can see for aircraft is being able to more up/down and fore/aft with no pitching of the aircraft. If I remember correctly the efficiency isn't as good as a conventional propeller.
Because you watch Smarter Everyday
Wouldn’t that be aerodynamics?
@@smallaxe255 in physics you can treat air as a liquid
Looks like a lot of thrust wasted due to 360 degree open design.
My company is developing e-Vtol in a different direction.. but i just love this ..one of the limiting factors to e-vtol is environmental particle dispersion ie FOD .. and rather than focusing trust vectoring in one direction , this has a radial factor and clearly would reduce the dust and drama associated with the future of e-vtol.. great work guys!
The loud music must be to mask just how noisy this thing is.
WHAT
I covered my speakers
Anything that flies will be "loud". Wise up.
@@davelowets Then how do you explain my joke flying over your head without you hearing it?
Yes it's basically a drone with extra steps, they'll go into obscurity in about 5 years.
Congratulations, configuring the blades so they actuate correctly during the revolution is an achievement in itself. Making a craft that follows these principals is something else entirely. Well done
High rotor speed, high actuating speed, high wear. Durability questionable.
(Then - who asked me)
?:o)
This is a Voith Schneider Propeller invented in 1929. Nothing new here but is now possible for aircraft due to composites and the power of the motors we have today and the lightweight batteries. Still cool.
your whole life depends on each and every belt not breaking...
"Configuring the blades during revolution"... have you heard about helicopter?
is the configuration differ from those in helicopters
it's like a miracle
Jesus approved.
Sh*t´s called physics
He doesn't know
You are verified as jesus
A miracle that someone provides funding for that
FINALLY, a true flying car! This proof of concept could lead to a car that runs on the road AND has the ability to hover and fly without a ton of propulsion pointed downward. Bravo!
Yes the wheels should be to make contact with the ground, be a car the turn in inner blades to fly
Bullshit! That is not a flying car, but something... loud
What I want to know is how efficient this is compared to normal propellers.
exactly and the noise level too🤔👌👍
Not efficient compared to propellers. Way to much waisted energy. It will have to depend completely stability management systems. Great effort but it will never be more than an experiment. This looks like it would be better in the water than the air.
@@jan-hg9vi Thanks for the answer. Makes no sense to build it then as even with propellers quadcopters can't stay in the air very long because batteries aren't energy dense enough.
@@jan-hg9vi you sound like an expert that has built one before; have you actually?
Besides lack of efficiency, this thing has a major problem when it comes to losing RPM on just one motor of the four. It would surely spin out of control. Or imagine losing power to just one of the four. It would snap itself apart.
When the music is so loud it renders the whole investment sus af
bro the music is just an action movie trailer version of the amogus trap remix if you can hear the melody
When they try this hard to hype up something that's pretty straightforward, you have to wonder why. Good products sell themselves.
Well that's interesting.
I see a of comments about not being as efficient as a helicopter. Which is true but look at it this way. A fixed wing aircraft is more efficient than a helicopter. Can travel faster and farther but requires a runway.
Helicopters are less efficient and carry less generally but can land in smaller areas. Down side is contact with the main rotor and trees or power lines end badly.
This design is much more compact than a helicopter with simpler mobility. First thing I thought of was aircraft for urban areas.
Looks like it's still in the early design stages but I see potential.
Precisely!!! Couldn’t agree more, thank you for putting forth a different perspective. I do hope your profession allows you to exercise dynamic thinking regularly. Cheers!🍻
I agree also! great concept and hey it works. This is what inventing is all about!
it is a waste off money and time
That doesn't make any sense. Efficiency is all in the design parameters, such as the Concorde throwing efficiency out the window for the sake of shorter flights. If you tried to compete with the Comcorde with rocket powered engines... everyone would tell you that's a bad idea.
It's more compact, but also less safe. If you lose power in an helicopter you can use the drag created by the air to windmill the rotor and create enough lift to perform an emergency landing instead of dropping like a rock. Can't do that with this one.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD it's not about a direct comparison of efficiency. Im looking at the gain in mobility at the expense of efficiency.
Crew: How to make this product look cool?
Sound guy: I have an idea!
Every freestyle quad video ever.
Finally, the first step towards an actual Star Wars "Speeder"!
Fuck yeah..
@@olddudeonaducati3153 someone made a flying car years ago... with 8 jet engines. And of course there's been a few attempts with duo and quad copter rotors.
@@Jeff55369 Those barrel-shaped rotors make it a lot more compact though. Fits the 'form factor' of a speeder or speeder bike a lot better...
My first thought was 'speeder bike' but yeah :-)
All it needs is a helmet sticking out of the bottom and it would be an upside down F1
That’s what I was thinking lmao that’s why I decided to watch the vid because I didn’t read the title so I thought it was an f1
Shh...
Don't forget a halo.
🤔So, you're saying... "Nice luggage rack, F1"?
Dont get too attached to things. Its even more than that.
If I remember correctly, there were some very similar designs to this one from the early days of flying machines, sometime in the late 1800s. I didn’t expect to see this design come back and work!
Jeez how old are you?
Like 150 or something. Stay strong and keep on going old timer 💪👨🏽🦳
Meat Fruit, maybe he remembers it from an old yt video, smart guy
@@WMithrandirXbox I don’t think it was from a yt video, I think it was a Wikipedia article
@@meatfruit1123 Also, I’m actually 17, although I may as well be 150 sometimes
I appreciate someone doing something completely different no matter how good or bad the final outcome is..this is what i consider to be true innovation!
Inovation on what?? Noise power?!? Inovation.... pff
@@dr.origami4991 send us some links of new stuff youre out there trying to do! Personally im still trying to figure out how they directionalized the airflow of the 4 squirrel cages downward...
Can it “auto rotate “ like a helicopter or will it come down like a beveled brick if it loses power?
I think the problems are a bit more complicated than that. It has 4 motors. If 1 dies, what's going to happen in that corner?
If it completely loses power, it won't be able to auto-rotate like a helicopter because, unlike a helicopter, it's not going to come down with the blades above. It's going to dive either forward or backwards (depending on where the weight is, looks like the back) and be as aerodynamic as it can as it plunges to the ground way faster than any helicopter. Driver is definitely going to get a fatal dose of ground poisoning.
Parachute would work if you're high enough.
@@petedavis7970 Never heard the term "ground poisoning" before. Brings to mind the saying "eat dirt", which can be applied to some of the same situations.
Made me chuckle, at any rate.
@@petedavis7970 Computers driving the motors are helpful here. Quad drones do well on three rotors as the computer can oscillate the 'across' blade to balance. I expect feathering of the cross blade assembly plus & minus could balance during a single motor failure. If another fails, time for the BRS.
What about just as a hover bike?
I wonder if the answer would be to have more rotors to allow some redundancy. if the machine has only just enough lift from it's rotors when they are all working then it would seem to be very dangerous.
Larger with a chute on the back and you've got a flying combine harvester! That was a really cool tech demo, and I'm excited to see where this goes!
(... Back into the field, probably)
The flying vehicles from Bladerunner looks more believable after watching this, nice work!
Exactly what came to mind when I saw it.
when your invention is so loud you gotta find music thats even louder...
Every aircraft is loud.
@@jerryg9207 yes but this one is 4 times louder and the sound is 360 around the pilot
@@daniellevy4104 you know how loud a car is to people next to it? Now think of how it sounds inside. Smae with a plane, same with a helicopter,same with a cyclocopter
As one random dude in the internet once said: "the more moving parts an object has, the more they can fail"
Or as Captain Montgomery Scott once said, "the more you overstep the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain".
Mechanism is surprisingly simple czcams.com/video/Ub563Yc3xls/video.html
@@kevinjpluck even that is too complicated. Could have them only able to produce upwards lift and then change the power between the motors. I think varying the blades is the part that makes it too complicated. This things works in the same way a bird flys. The blades should only be able to move just enough to produce lift on down stroke and move just enough to make no lift on the up stroke. That is how birds do it.
I mean we already 4 prop airplanes, multi engine jets, as well as a whole host of other complex things. Like nuclear subs and ships. This is no more complex then those? Not to diminish the innovativeness of this design.
Woah! Way before the internet that was said.
Those wheels would make the best margaritas on the planet!
Finally what everyone's been waiting for. Hovering Cars!
@ I think they just skipped a part
not everyone. i've been waiting for banning cars
Those have been around for sixty years.
they would work great in London nothing goes forwards
Yeah, exactly. I was immediately thinking of Blade runner.
it could also use as a air raid alarm device in terms of the sound.
Yeah I wonder how they can figure that out...
This looks COOL
It looks cool, but I'm not clear on why it's better than a conventional prop. It's certainly more complicated, and I would think that means more points of failure. 🤷♂
@@IdahoQuadcopter it's safer and more compact.
@@IdahoQuadcopter for its application, its far safer for the rider (not so much for bystanders). Remember that Russian hover-bike with the 4 open props spinning at high rpm inches from the riders legs? If I recall correctly, the pilot suffered severe leg injuries when he crashed.
This thing in a similar crash situation will eject the high speed moving parts away from the rider.
@@cheroso1000 the real question is efficiency, how much more energy is this system using to achieve the same level of lift?
It looks aweful like a flying shoe
Never thought humankind would actually finally 'reinvent the wheel'
did they? looks pretty round to me
@Alt Persona
and what shape is a wheel?
@@darkracer1252 i think its kinda wheelie shaped. I could be wrong, 1 second now...... just looked at my car most def wheel like. Hope i helped.
@Alt Persona i think we all agree.
that they are wheels
and the OP is wrong
It's a Phoenician sailing technology
Amazing... congrats everyone on a great first flight!
I could literally film my cat taking a dump with this music in the background, and it would seem epic
In a Voith Schneider the center of rotation can be shifted/changed. By the looks of it this center of rotation is fixed which makes it a Kirsten-Boeing type propulsor. Both quite classic cycloidal propulsor design patterns which haven been around for a century or so.
True. But great achievement anyway! I've never seen a big drone using that principle.
@@atalazs there are a few youtubers who have made drones like this.
@@gurgleblaster2282 True. So when boeing showed their deamliner, have you commented "its a plane, I've seen that 100 Years ago!"? To use such an uncommon propuslion system is a big risk and deserves some appreciation for the involved entrepreneurs ans engineers. And for all tec: we're standing on the shoulders of giants.
@@atalazs Agreed. People just want to disagree out of principle smh
It looks to me like the blade angle is adjustable. Assuming that's done under software control, and not just centrifugal force, then I was originally thinking it could be more of a Werner-Klemperer design. But now I think you're right. Kirsten-Boeing.
That's an interesting concept. Now make the inner and outer rims of the drums lined in rubber and you have an electric flying car as well.
They use these vertical tube "engines" on sailing ships and cargo ferries for years, only surprised it took this long to put them horizontal to make things fly. Such a simple mechanism but seems to be very delicate when it comes to flying. Nice one!
Probably because you cannot possibly perform an autorotation with this system, resulting in a vehicle loss if a failure of any of the four rotors should occur. It's unsuitable for human transportation.
This is going to revolutionize the market for large, slow, loud, unmanned drones that don't need a payload.
This is a "rerun" Today's' scientist are unable to invent anything. They just recycle old ideas.
Look this "revolutionize the market for large" at Anton Flettner (November 1, 1885 - December 29, 1961)
@@lazarduke6596 Recycling old ideas is how inventions improve... Therefore the inventors are inventing..
@@ifarted6422 therfore improvement of one invention is not "invention" but "impruvement" Nikola Tesla invented AC, MRI, Remote control, and around other 1000 different patents.All of them were improved, but those who improved those Teslas' patents WE CAN NOT CALL INVENTORS of those Tesla patents.
@@lazarduke6596 You called scientists inventors.. I think you need to go look up the definition of both lmfao.. Love how you spin off the subject of using somebody as an example when you don't make sense at all
@@ifarted6422 just the opposite. Scientist are NOT necessarily inventors, but they could be.
Learn to properly read and think to properly understand whats written.
Well that was different.
I will be looking at this more.
Good luck.
investor : how many moving part you'll need for this project?
cyclotech : yes!
Yeah I still don't get why invest in this, it's never going to compete against a simple electric motor and a efficient propeller.
@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss Yes, please tell us the differences in inefficiencies derived from your extensive aerospace engineering degree and years of study and application.
They are “youtuber” .. just to get some views
@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss And is efficiency the only consideration?
Hint : no
Now consider the differences.
@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss imagine this product in 10--20,yrs it will be wow, a prototoype for someone to make an air-bike like in star wars!!! In the near future the hypodroms will be filled watching these things race, you will be able to travel long distances, etci tell you =)
How energy efficient is it compared to regular mutlirotors at the moment ?
At least space-wise and security-wise, it's a winner
Yes
Doesn't matter. This company has been around for nearly 18 years now, and despite never producing anything, they continue to have these demos every few years and somehow continues to get fools to throw money at them.
@@sectokia1909 exactly this brought us closer to flying cars about as much as back to the future 2
This technology isn't new, been used on heavy transport ferries and sailing ships as vertical mechanical sails. Very efficient and easy to maintain as they have few moving parts compared to screw propelled.
However it seems like using them for flight is a little more tricky.
Unlike a quadcopter, this one has to constantly change the angle of the blades with every blade rotation. Not aware of any system with just a single rotor that can fly without auto-rotating and even a propellor is considered a rotor too.
Crucially: can I ride it while firing a phaser at some ewoks?
Great! Those blowers make pretty loud EDM music
Pretty cool! It's like Magnus effect craft had a baby with a paddle boat. If those blades could be designed to fold in on themselves, then you got yourself some wheels!
Going on the ground is for old ppl. :)
Or instead of the blades folding, you have an outer rim tyre that’s folds back to the body revealing the bladed wheel
I saw the thumbnail and thought "Cool! A magnus effect doo-dad". Its a bit weirder, which is always fun.
Just add rubber along the rim and you got wheels that can go from road to air. First of its kind.
This is technically NOT the magnus effect, but rather a "cyclorotor" - similar in function to a Voith Schneider/Kirsten-Boeing Propeller, but on it's side. If this was lifted by the Magnus effect, you wouldn't need the smaller vanes inside the cylinder, but instead would want a smooth cylinder for the air to "stick" to as it spins. I'd love to know how this cyclorotor setup stacks up against traditional rotors, as it seems to add more noise and mechanical complexity, while reducing power efficiency. Maybe it's purely for a smaller footprint and resistance to impacts?
i would like to see those as F1 race - that would be spectacular crashes!
this dude can fly over it
Is this how speed racer starts?
Phantum Menace racing pods
When the sound guy is a hardcore gamer but hes allowed to go balls to walls on the edit.
It's just distortion with ZERO dynamic range
Very impressive. Looking forward to seeing these really take-off!
I see what u did there 😂
eVTOL Now you have to make a DeLorean Shell for this.
Doc would be proud of you guys👌🏼😉
First Responder uses for that as Logistical Support would be almost everything. From Surveillance to dropping first aid. Larger the scale the greater the possibilities.
Trust me they will weaponize it
Can’t they already do that with regular drones
Vice versa. Everything for civilian use was developed for military purposes.
@@neomrelyt Yes, but this could, for instance, lift an injured person in a Closer area fast than abseiling for instance.
If it can hover Horizontally, then it could hover Vertically.
@@marshalljulie3676 I did say "First responders" which would include Armed Response.
The Military funding of something like this is how civilian life gain the benefits.
Now that is just craaaazy.😲👏🏼 Really didn’t think this was possible.
I'm really excited for where drone tech is going to be in 10 or 20 years!
Am Canadian 63 not too excited about that siggh
Nonetheless this is exponentially more fascinating, daily.
Watch the movie Terminator. Those Ariel HK’s are pretty much the direction they’re going.
war.
Finally something revolutionary for flying it's always been more blades for helicopters style or more wing. This is something new
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclogyro
First they already testing cyclogyro from 1940+
Second that not efficient as blades and to lift a copter you need cyclogyro the size copter and at least need 2 of them
Without blades there is no autorotation to the ground to survive a power/engine failure. With this setup you just crash and die…
Bruh there are blades inside rotors and this tech were made more than 100 years ago by one russian engineer. Now in Russia they're also developing "Cyclocopter".
I want anti gravity alien tech.. Tired of all this spinny stuff
Instead of playing the noise, how about telling us some interesting facts about the craft? How fast do those things turn? How much power do they require? How much does the thing weigh? I assume power is coming from the overhead cable for now. Will it be able to lift off with a battery? How long will it be able to fly? What happens if a motor fails? Etc, etc, etc.
I found this on it: "Cyclotech | Cyclogyro Principle" czcams.com/video/gwsmKxDwgz8/video.html
Had to mute the video because of the awful awful "drama music".
@@TanukiDigital удали Ютюб у себя
The noise sucks.
Entitled much?
When motors get too powerful, people always find creative ways to build inefficient designs that barely flies XD
Thankyou for pointing this out
they do it with computers..make faster processors then load it down with buggy flashy software,,back to slow again..
Ohh boy another ignorant guy here.
@@gugugaga5867 yeah yeah rotating blades and all, we get it..
it's like little kids that walk flayling their arms and legs in all directions but don't get far,,, lots of movement no progress. but it's fun huh?
@@gugugaga5867 Who?You?!
Instead of music, how about a brief explanation of the dynamics of the technology we’re looking at, as well as just simply hearing it spool up.
I found this on it: "Cyclotech | Cyclogyro Principle" czcams.com/video/gwsmKxDwgz8/video.html
@@manp1039 Nice! Never saw your reply until now, but I appreciate you putting in the link. Very intriguing design. 👍🏻😁
to the development team: keep up the good work! You are onto a winner here.....
Thanks. I've been waiting to see a thought come to life. After I saw the Dyson products I was sure someone would think of this, and also the semi bladeless wind turbines!
Not every single technology is revolutionary but when harnessed and combined by equally talented minds we can create things no one thought possible.
Of all, this is the most similar to fiction film vehicles, I believe that's the way to go!
Yes...this is the future
Another indication is that those look like wheels and so hypothetically ... they could also be designed to roll on asphalt ... or a surface somewhat less _car sin ogenic._ It would be 4 wheel hub motor drive. That is what the Delorean should have been equipped with in Back To The Future 1 (and will be if a remake is even still possible in the future. Both the franken virus and mRNA sequence are from Ft. Detrk.)
czcams.com/video/EAJM5L9hhBs/video.html Jet Suit by Gravity Industries
If they added some wings it could be far more efficient hovering across water using ground effect.
Have lots of mice running around in the fan and we go !!
looks like a whole lotta energy with a pretty negligible thrust.
main question here is...WHY??
Safer than traditional blades for applications around common folks (such as Amazon drone idea)?
I am asking the same question though but maybe they have another video?
Congratulations! You reinvented the wheel and made it squared!
You know who doesn't need a raise? The editor.
Cool, but seems kinda loud BUT the damn music drowns out the real sounds of awesome.
I noticed the people in the control booth were wearing ear protection.
There's a reason for that. It's so loud with all that wasted energy that no one would go anywhere near the thing.
Yeah planes and helicopters are loud too. That's in the nature of anything moving enough air for powered flight.
@@stephenstreet1045 When you have such a highly inefficient design more energy is converted into sound energy.
A recording only with the sound of the rotors would be cool. Are they that silent?
Tom Yeah, I thought it was fairly quiet, especially compared to a helicopter. The music and levels could have made it seem that way though.
Joe Biden administration already ordered 1000 of them. Let Go Brandon! 😬
@@AwesomeBlackDude man y'all have the worst fuckin jokes
Probably not lol
@@cameltoast who is "y'all". Are you racist?
"We already have flying cars, they're called helicopters!"
- Neil deGrasse Tyson, 2018
And they can autorotate on engine failure.
You can't drive a helicopter down the road
As usual NdGT is trying to demonstrate how much more clever he is than everyone else. The goal of a 'flying car', surely, is not to transport people on a super expensive VTOL craft flown by a 'highly trained full time professional', but to get the same utility from VTOL 'car' piloted by an 'average human being'.
@@QuarkburgerInfact you can it's called ''Pall-V one''
@@Quarkburger Flying cars are usually shown in sci fi to not need any roads.
voith schneider propellers have been around for a while interesting to see in action.
This tech reminds me of the Fanwing R&D
@Khaliil bin Ammar the propeller design these engineers are using was invented in 1908.
They are well established, and also called rotocycloid propellers.
Now if that thing could carry a normal sized adult it would be beyond mind blowing.
Hold your ponies its a prototype.
Just don't get a leg caught in the turbine, or kiss it goodbye.
And hundreds of pounds of battery......
And eardrum-blowing.
True... but I have to say, that was a very smooth take off.
More information would have been nice. Is the "wheel" changing angle of attack of the "wing" attached to the wheel over a single revolution of the wheel? If so, I would assume moving the wings (or should I say vanes) that much is sure to be the weak point structurally.
Is there any reason to believe this is better than a ducted fan?
I guessed that as well. Like a helicopter blade. It looks cool but I doubt it is more efficient. Could be wrong though.
I would call it progress. Look back at the first flying machines and see what we have now. Give this a chance. It may bring amazing discoveries.
I believe it is using the magnus effect
czcams.com/video/lXJ1OTp37Xg/video.html
@@МаксОттоФонШтирлиц-о8я czcams.com/video/gbn0Bnt3iDs/video.html
Now this is a concept that would finally make all those Bladerunner style floating cars and Star Wars floating land rovers come true. I know Star Wars used anti gravity but this is much better than prop drones as cars imho
We're a type class .73 civilization after all, give time we'll get there.
🧐 Well, no, I don't think so, not like this. Replace those stupid variable vane / wing things it uses, with four electric or propellant powered turbo style (car turbo) thrusters. Then you have four controllable nozzles that don't require such a ridiculous arrangement of exposed, electronically controlled spinning surfaces.
But please bear in mind that helicopters can do an auto rotation if the engine fails, and land safely. Airplanes can glide, and land too. These things will fall out of the sky if the propulsion system fails.
@@MrClassiccarenthusia Makes sense. I just meant the design is making more sense in this direction than open prop drones claiming to be flying "cars" of the future.
@@haldyordan2316 I feel if past inventions were not suppressed we would have been so much further by now.
@@MrClassiccarenthusia inventors of the past did invent seemingly stupid things, and yet from these inspire evolvement of better ideas....
Congratulations on breaking the boundaries!!!!
Sick! looking forward to see some real world flights with this thing.
I fly drones and I can tell you, if you have a crash or do some damage to just one of the four props, it falls out of the sky.
Not like a plane which can use 3, 2, or 1 of its engines or even glide to safety. Nope it's all over.
This seems like extra complexity for a device that already only needs a single point of failure.
They will need to implement a safety system similar to the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity landing on Mars🤔
This is a shit design with too much hype.
but then again, this thing flies in a way a plane does not. this would be more similar to a helicopter which would also fail if just one of the rotor blades are messed up
@@Skunkanoid No, a helicopter is probably a whole lot safer than this because of autorotation.
@@lunchbox1553
Safety has nothing to do with his comment being correct.
The only benefit I see in this type of propellers is that they might be safer for passengers but I can’t imagine how much more energy it takes to lift it up compared to conventional propellers. Unless its powered by a nuclear reactor I don’t think you can travel a mile and back
I don't think it'll have the same lifting ability as a typical helicopter, just my opinion but it looks great good job
I'm sure you've seen the old 1904 ? Maybe later video of this kind of contraption, that always amazed me that it was even tried. Yes, like my electric RC aircraft, I'm sure I would be disappointed in the useful flight time it would have. Next will be a giant screw that turns 43 gazillion rpm. Can I watch!
well then you have no imagination .. I had this idea over 15+ years ago. My idea was to make exact same "propellers", but build them into car wheels. So you literally have hover cars that can easily just take off at any time.
I hope their idea is to actually include this in cars and now just have some quadcopter wannabe
I feel like the whole point of such kinds of vehicles is that they're less cumbersome, more compat than the ones using regular propellers, it's not just about efficiency
As far as sound, what is really amazing is how quiet this machine is compared to anything else out there!
Yes but can it be used to for the motorized destruction of other countries? Because that's what man does with his best technology.
All I see is like “wow they got a lot of 80/20 to build those shields I wonder what the lead time on that shipment was”
I kept thinking those shields looked slick and aspirational but would not stop the entire crew from dying a horrible death if there was any number of catastrophic malfunctions.
Note to viewers: *No narration; recommend hitting mute.*
or turn it up cause it sounds awesome
@@Aqzaqa I would have preferred to have heard the motor/prop sound.
Amateur hour production for a promising product. Why listen to what the rotors actually actually sounds like when you can listen to that RIDICULOUS MILITARY ACTION MOVIE MUSIC instead??
you can hear the motor/prop sound in the background. Sounds like a tree shredder, and all of the engineers are wearing hearing protection.
I did hit mute after a few seconds of the awful music. Turned it off to see if any facts were being spoke, but no, sound of the rotors at one point. Maybe you could say at the beginning that there will be no information, that way we will know to leave mute on.
Video ruined by the music, c'mon...
Magnus effect? Stellar work!! Congrats on your hardworking paying off!!
Regular wing lift. It's a cylogyro.
Glad this was recommended to me. Wow. This makes flying cars more believable and achievable. Amazing!
We've had flying cars for half a century now.... they're called helicopters
There has been commercially produced flying cars since the 1950's though... maybe you just have not been paying attention?
@@orion7741 i thought i just said that...
People can't drive normal cars without crashing, so don't go holding your breath over FLYING cars.
@@FreeEricBrandt yeah...they'd be helicopters though dumbass, clues in the title. So not a flying car.
This is the start of flying cars!!! Keep it up!!! Wheels and lift all in one! There should be no dislikes on this attempt!!!
Oh yeah, the start of flying cars, like people said in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s... You want a flying car? Buy a Helicopter. If on this flying cars that are showing up an engine fails you are done. A helicopter has autorotation, a plane can glide, this things will spin out of controll and fall like a rock. I rember in the late 80s you could buy toy kites which used the same prinzipal, they also crashed pretty fast if the wind wasnt right ;)
People have a hard time with regular cars not flying into houses you want them actually crashes through your roof?
Yes! 😂👍
COULD BE as MUCH of the ambient parasitic shock we "hear" as sound COULD be mitigated by Body style, and the "Flying Car" would NOT need the efficiencies demanded by outright FLIGHT - commercial or private !
@@Hans-Yolo Parachutes.
Would be nice if this can go from driving like a car to flying. Those things already looks like wheels. Half wheel half propeller.
A propeller pushes the air like a fan blade... These are airfoil that generate lift from creating low-pressure system above itself
LOUD AF!
@@f_USAF-Lt.G they both operate under the exact same principles
@UCgST5xd8hxpz1Ud-rBPa6jQ wow got your panties in a bind? I don't see any problem with his question and big deal you read the little description that really doesn't give much information and your going to act like you know so much about it. Why couldn't it drive like a car first? If the props need speed for liftoff then use a hydraulic or electric lift first to get it off the ground then it can spin up to speed, it doesn't matter the type of props they are and let's not forget he was just making a comment not trying to re invent the machine.
what does it cost to hit a pothole?
Holy shit!!! Here we go, the first step to flying cars!!!
Great work guys!
Chill tf out with the music tho.
We are one step closer to the flying cars in The 5th Element. I’m stoked!
Word🤙
BAADAABOOM.
We'll never have flying cars. People are too stupid driving regular cars as it is.
@@austinpetemo that's why we have Tesla and subsystem's like pid modules on drones
Beautiful, push the envelope that how we advance, two thumbs up.
No envelopes were harmed in this folly.
No propellers, no jets, no rockets. .....amazing work guys and gals. Well done.
This is what will make flying cars a reality in the future!
Nope, not happening.
perhaps is yes... so the engineer can hide the rotor behind the body of the car it self... I hope so
That really was a glimpse in to the future!!! Wheels that fly !!
"The wheels in the sky keeps on turning."
So that's how Santa's sleigh works 😎
SECRETS _REVEALED_ !!
I can see the string holding it up!;) Seriously, nice job!
How much weight can it support at what speeds and for how long? Also what happens if a prop fails? Also what safety measures can be implemented so someone doesnt lose an appendage to a prop? I see a lot of waste of money on a prototype.
Gravity takes control if a prop fails.
Looks an interesting concept, hoping the moving parts for the blades can cope with the constant wear and tear and forces on them, I'd also be interested in fail safes should one motor fail.. interesting concept though.
If the motors are powerfoul enough one failure should not be a problem. Use the 2 motors on opposite edges that still work for power and movement and use the 3rd one thats working to stabalize.
@@maxmustermann167 the electronics and opposing motor would have to kick in and react to a failing motor very quickly to compensate for the forces acting on the vehicle to stop it flipping.. this can be done but will not be an easy task. Best of luck to them.
If I were in a flying car that utilized these, I'd definitely want there to be 6. Just in case...
@@maxmustermann167 like a table?
A helicopters blades also pitch and rotate vertically...however this has a lot more blades so failure rate would go up. I can't see it being an issue.
Drop those rotors a bit and add some rubber strips, and you could get off to a running start :D
😂that might be phase 2 for the F1 racing April fools stunt planned
So the F1 cars now can fly upside down and play music? I’m for it
Maybe it could be held by an emergency parachute it looks pretty light
Genial!👏👏👏👏
That’s a cool use for those turbines. They’re used mostly on water vehicles because of their efficiency, I’m sure it’s gonna be great when perfected for a lighter, thinner fluid as air. It also can be used for submarines.
That’s an awesome invention. Question is is there any way this is more efficient than a typical propeller or can it be made to be? Regardless, I guess no progress is ever made unless someone is willing to think outside of the box. Seems like a lot of moving parts in a type of craft that would usually be built with a lot of redundancy and failsafes.
It's more compact, but will always be less efficient than a normal helicopter propellor.
The simplest explanation would be: in a normal propellor all blades can push air downwards 100% of the time, while this propellor design has about 50% of it's upper blades covered by the bottom blades. Only the remaining 50% bottom blades can produce lift.
@@timmy7201 I was thinking that too, though I'm keeping in mind the drag from tip vortices and drag from props.
@@timmy7201 I believe the airfoils invert at the bottom half of the rotation. Seen at around 0:08
Even with all the functions this has, it’s super inefficient, has transition time and downtime, and wouldn’t have the same auto rotation safety that helicopters typically have. This is good for it’s compactness and ground safety (put a mesh over the “wheels” and no one can lose a finger, meanwhile it is very easy to lose a head from a helicopter, or even fall over).
Helicopters and normal multi prop vehicles will always be better for everything besides size.
@@ButchNackley yes, the blades change pitch as the wheel rotates to push the air in the direction it wants to go
Scaling up to battery energy vs weight I don’t think it’s as efficient. Even some ordinary electric propeller craft have issues with scaling up for efficiency.
I don't think these are as efficient as propellers too
But the cost of nano Materials... 😅
Can't we just put thin rubber strips on either side of the rotaries and put it in as an F1 for April fools day, that way a race car goes flying " into " control
I don't think it's meant to be more efficient, I think its meant to be safer and compact
@@maximman102n7 I agree.
Can't have flying cars with 10,000 RPM decapitators flying around the walmart parking lot. I think this is an attempt to make a flying "car" without having blades.
Very few commenters here have ever heard of a Voith Schneider Propeller, let alone know what it does or how it works.
I do, and I think this thing is b1oody brilliant.
And I'm generally not one to say nice things about anything.
Chalk up another point for the SkyNet. Honestly, at this rate, we're gonna have to start looking for safe heaven for humans much earlier than anticipated. Nice going, guys.
That ship sailed when cell phones were invented.
Does any progress scare you that much?
@@MorteWulfe does any attempt at humor escapes you?
What’s the efficiency relative to open rotor blades? Interesting tech though…
I was honestly thinking the same thing. With the forward motion of the rotors and blade pitch requirements it seems open to too many moving parts and one failed part could mean failure......but what do I know.
I was thinking the same as well... If there's no advantage to this design over regular rotor designs, aren't they just reinventing a wheel that doesn't really need reinvented?
@@StewsChannel: It'll probably work in water real well Lol
Open rotor blades are vulnerable to defense mechanisms like nets thrown by other drones, this one doesn't have blades that easily break off
@@Sam-nj2zw but it has massive wheel rotors that could easily get wrapped in the same same net or the net to jam the fins in the wheel. If anything it's more vulnerable.
is this using the coanda effect? reminds me of some old boat designs
Dang you're right
@@donaldbarton6701 Damn you're right to telling him he's right.
@@Tezorus and you're right for telling me I'm right for telling him he's right
@@donaldbarton6701 I can't believe how right you are for telling me I'm right for telling you you're right for telling him he's right.
@@Tezorus 🤣👍
Wow, propellers that spin in a different direction. 👏✊