@@graffiti4christ956 he said it looks like a flying car, thos other ones are just upscaled quadcopters, this one with the diferent propeller look like wheels
Honestly with the purpouse of use on transport that uses traditional propellers, there's no real need to make them quieter. Theres a reason that no manned aircraft has made good use of toroidal propellers or these. Also it means that its limited to being used by drones since it faces perpendicularly to the flow of air so it cannot be used on a 'forward travelling' aircraft like a plane.
Could the rotors act as wheels on the ground if rubber was added or if the blade structure was 3D printed similar to the new type of wheels that don't require tubes?
This is amazing, great work! Thanks for inventing the future - just work on the efficiency of the blades, so the sound can be more quite and maybe work with different textures on the blades, to get more drag and lift in general, this could improve the blades and the efficiency
Would be interesting to know some of the specs on this type of rotor, like how much energy is required to make it perform . In what ways might it be better than traditional methods of flight. It's great to see new ideas explored , but are they more practical in every way to what we have now?
With a speaker for each cage this could be entirely silent. The amount of electricity used for the speaker to silence each unit this could fly perfectly silently except for the sound of the downward thrust of air. Which will be gentle compared to the thrust off propeller blades. The only thing that would instantly take her down would be a small plastic bag. Anything blown up by the rotor could be injested and create immediate results. That is where the ripping shredding motion of a standard propeller would take precedence. The pilot could be made aware of this danger and any flying bits could be vectored away from the rotors.
Remarkable! It’s about time somebody took aviation to the next level. (Sikorski was treated as a crackpot when he developed the helicopter. History repeats itself, right?)
Dr Ignaz Semmelweis was also considered insane for suggesting washing your hands before delivering a baby would reduce infections. This is a cornerstone in multiple industries today.
Besides up and down can it move in other directions, how does it do this? I'm thinking by changing speeds of individual rotors? Also what happens when losing one or more rotors/blades can it auto rotate or glide to safety?
That is the advantage of the cyclogyro concept. It changes pitch of each blade at different times in the overall revolution to instantly vector thrust along any direction in 360 degrees.
The thrust vector of each cyclorotor can be individually controlled. You can have the vector in an angle slightly backwards so it produces lift and forward force at the same time.
И скорость не показали. Может до 150км/с летать. Но даже на 200 метров не пролетел никуда. Я надеялся, что хоть шум будет меньше, но нет... К сожалению, нужна какая-то другая технология.
@@Rusl_U Это тестовые полёты, показывают что и так тоже летать возможно и скорость тут явно не на первом месте, как и дальность, вероятно проверяли управляемость, вибрации и т.п.. Пока лучше воздушных винтов ни чего не придумали, естественно для машин подобного класса, и ,как мне кажется, в ближайшее время не придумают, вот если создадут что-то подобное крыльям и приводам стрекозы... но это уже из области фантастики)
Fascinating. Had a question while I was watching - What emergency option would pilots of this kind of aircraft have during loss of power? Without wings in a conventional sense, I don't imagine gliding is possible. Are cyclo-rotors capable of some form of autorotation that would give them unpowered descent capabilities akin to a helicopter? If not, what would the general plan be for operators in the event that the motors failed? Thanks!
Ballistic chute. Ultralight aircraft have them as well. I still think they have to add a wing surface of some sort. The advantage in this case would be the transition to forward flight will become easier.
Great, you can use this for vertical take off and landing, for traveling purpose gliding is far more efficient. By this technology now you can use your rotors as tyres
Gliding doesn't work in crowded city spaces without large airports. This technology is meant to provide solutions for crowded spaces. Imagine landing spaces in a park near your house and another at your work. You could have aerial buses where your commute is cut in half and pollution is eliminated.
efficiency??? basically, if aerodynamics is not the main scope one can fly a door with a powerful power motor. Same goes for fancy blades like this one.
I'm skeptical. Flying a light prototype is one thing. Scaling this up to the size and weight for 2-3 passengers is going to be a huge challenge. I expect they will be going for investors based on this prototype.
The ability to change the direction of thrust without turning the propeller is obviously the main scope of the mission. They probably didn’t think that they needed to explain it to anyone
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m this concept also have spoilers or fins inside that rotating drum and they tilt them also . in this design the fins are parallel to the axis of rotation. i think you have get the whole idea wrong.
Unfortunately, there are few who work fruitfully in this direction. But the fact that this team is working on creating a cyclogyro even according to the old aerodynamic design of 1909 is also very cool!
Working on magnus effect vehicle for senior design and cant tell you one rotor going outs gonna mean a crash and a hard one at that(hard dive to a corner and flip over). Also definitely requires more power than a standard prop plane of equivalent size bc the rotors have to provide the lift whereas a prop plane the forward motion creates a lift. What I'm curious to see here is how they achieve a somewhat efficient directional motion seeing as the rotors mostly just provide lift.
At least they are honest about the noise - which seems to be not extremely loud. Are the going to develop a larger model for the second test pilot? LOL
@@user-jh6ik1qd7p Not really, if anything making drone based 'flying cars' is a terrible design choice in terms of energy efficiency. Forward travelling aircraft like planes are much more efficient as they use lift and forward motion to keep them in the air whereas you must be using a high rate of power from quad rotors to be able to move slowly. While yes, it makes sense for compact areas where short take off and landings are needed, in any range its better to use a car or train, or take a plane
If they come to America or UK sell it to a big company they will have these flying around in a few years. It gets rid of the biggest issue the rotar. If it had some real funding it may do somthing cool. Edit. Crazy that the CZcams Short that some dude made about this thing has more views by probably millions then this whole page has...Thats how i thought to look this up crazy.
If you lose one spool, the fall will be immediate. By reducing the wing length, noise increases. It is unlikely that the development will reach civilian use
If by lose one spool you mean one motor on one rotor breaks, there's an easy way to mitigate that risk. Simply link the rotors together with axels to a single motor (or tandem motors for redundancy) and a drive shaft with a transfer case like an AWD car
Bro is so smart and he couldn't use common sense to sound natural whenever he was speaking about the product.... He made it very obvious he was reading of the teleprompter when he spoke.. like if he was having a conversation and doesn't know what his next word spoken will be
Finally, somebody has waken up, been playing with Flettner and cycle rotors in rc years ago, this is the future for many things, like wind turbines
wind turbines are actual trash
This is awesome! Can't wait to see how this will develop into the future
The first flying lawnmower looks great 🎉
Very exciting! This is the first thing I've seen that actually looks and feels like a flying car. Awesome.
Do you live under a rock? Haha 😄 there is a far better that already has approval and actually drives.
@@graffiti4christ956 he said it looks like a flying car, thos other ones are just upscaled quadcopters, this one with the diferent propeller look like wheels
This inspired me as well
Totally bad a$$! Keep up the great work gentlemen, can't wait to see the next step in your design evolution.
Wow. So cool. Great work!
Just amazing!
Smooth landing !
well done. exciting times.
Earned my sub cant wait to see the development
That’s really awesome team!
Kinda reminds me of the aricraft in the opening scene of Terminator. CycloTech... SkyNet
Very Interesting concept and kudos for making it work!
I think the propeller idea is cool and it looks safer than swinging a giant sword around
This is an interesting concept for flying drones. How noisy this solution is comparing to traditional propellers?
Picture your household vacuum on the highest setting with the hood off, times 4
Honestly with the purpouse of use on transport that uses traditional propellers, there's no real need to make them quieter. Theres a reason that no manned aircraft has made good use of toroidal propellers or these. Also it means that its limited to being used by drones since it faces perpendicularly to the flow of air so it cannot be used on a 'forward travelling' aircraft like a plane.
All the best for your future testing. get this reality as soon as possible . I like to see with human carrier model .😊
Well done! Great work.
Nice job, gentlemen!
Extraordinary🔥🔥🔥
Dope asf!
Impressive!
Big hairdryer :), love it
Impressive!! Just wait until the world sees this!
Insane engendering....future plane are here...kudos🎉🎉
Could the rotors act as wheels on the ground if rubber was added or if the blade structure was 3D printed similar to the new type of wheels that don't require tubes?
when you fold up the prop, could you turn the cyclorotor like a tire so that it can run on the road as well?
Bro it was epic
Salute to those who stick with their dreams. 👍🏿
Cool. Moving around in 3D like in "The Fifth Element" is near.
"near", as in: "this century.
@@epaminon6196give it 25 years or so
Back in the 1970s they said the same about computers
impressive!
This is amazing, great work! Thanks for inventing the future - just work on the efficiency of the blades, so the sound can be more quite and maybe work with different textures on the blades, to get more drag and lift in general, this could improve the blades and the efficiency
Bravo!
What do you guys use to control all the vectoring of the flaps in each barrel?
Would be interesting to know some of the specs on this type of rotor, like how much energy is required to make it perform . In what ways might it be better than traditional methods of flight. It's great to see new ideas explored , but are they more practical in every way to what we have now?
Молодцы ребята!
With a speaker for each cage this could be entirely silent. The amount of electricity used for the speaker to silence each unit this could fly perfectly silently except for the sound of the downward thrust of air. Which will be gentle compared to the thrust off propeller blades. The only thing that would instantly take her down would be a small plastic bag. Anything blown up by the rotor could be injested and create immediate results. That is where the ripping shredding motion of a standard propeller would take precedence. The pilot could be made aware of this danger and any flying bits could be vectored away from the rotors.
For military aircraft, you would need barrels that are bigger and longer, that way they can bite/ displace more air
Remarkable! It’s about time somebody took aviation to the next level. (Sikorski was treated as a crackpot when he developed the helicopter. History repeats itself, right?)
Dr Ignaz Semmelweis was also considered insane for suggesting washing your hands before delivering a baby would reduce infections. This is a cornerstone in multiple industries today.
Ok. I'll fly it. Not scared
I assume the blades could be semi hidden with screens that would allow air flow but act as a guard.
Besides up and down can it move in other directions, how does it do this? I'm thinking by changing speeds of individual rotors? Also what happens when losing one or more rotors/blades can it auto rotate or glide to safety?
That is the advantage of the cyclogyro concept. It changes pitch of each blade at different times in the overall revolution to instantly vector thrust along any direction in 360 degrees.
Very exciting. Proud to see Indians as core
Team. All the best guys. Rock the world.
The thrust vector of each cyclorotor can be individually controlled. You can have the vector in an angle slightly backwards so it produces lift and forward force at the same time.
Уровень шума слишком велик и навряд ли его можно снизить до приемлемых значений.
И скорость не показали.
Может до 150км/с летать. Но даже на 200 метров не пролетел никуда.
Я надеялся, что хоть шум будет меньше, но нет...
К сожалению, нужна какая-то другая технология.
@@Rusl_U Это тестовые полёты, показывают что и так тоже летать возможно и скорость тут явно не на первом месте, как и дальность, вероятно проверяли управляемость, вибрации и т.п.. Пока лучше воздушных винтов ни чего не придумали, естественно для машин подобного класса, и ,как мне кажется, в ближайшее время не придумают, вот если создадут что-то подобное крыльям и приводам стрекозы... но это уже из области фантастики)
Наверняка большой расход энергии ...
Но выглядит интересно.
If you can make this a cost as much as a four-wheeler. It would be the most popular vehicle ever built.
Fascinating. Had a question while I was watching - What emergency option would pilots of this kind of aircraft have during loss of power? Without wings in a conventional sense, I don't imagine gliding is possible. Are cyclo-rotors capable of some form of autorotation that would give them unpowered descent capabilities akin to a helicopter? If not, what would the general plan be for operators in the event that the motors failed? Thanks!
I think it will be a parachute.
Parachute like Cirrus airplanes probably
Death😂
Splat.
Ballistic chute. Ultralight aircraft have them as well. I still think they have to add a wing surface of some sort. The advantage in this case would be the transition to forward flight will become easier.
Damn that thing is loud!
These are better and safer than propellers.
This is incredible thank you!
Nice, i will share it on my Linkedin account with >30 k followers
Wow!!! Grape🍇!!!!! But all seriousness though, this vehicle is dope.
These look like the early models for the troop transport in the hunger games
It's smaller than a helicopter, so it BETTER be quieter. But if you scale it up to helicopter size will it really be quieter?
Does it it have a lot of ground turbulence like helicopters?
Great, you can use this for vertical take off and landing, for traveling purpose gliding is far more efficient.
By this technology now you can use your rotors as tyres
Yea, but lots of research should be done how to pull it trough
@@kvarnerinfoTVtough or through?
Gliding doesn't work in crowded city spaces without large airports. This technology is meant to provide solutions for crowded spaces. Imagine landing spaces in a park near your house and another at your work. You could have aerial buses where your commute is cut in half and pollution is eliminated.
Different kinds of emergency services around the world would be probably interested
@@Feintgames🤣😂🤣😂 pollution eliminated?.... You do realize a large amount of electricity is made from burning fossil fuels still?
❤
Seems louder than drones and feels like it is taking a lot of power to just hover.
Well done guys!!! Impressive demo... 🦘🦘🦘
What is the range and the speed of this?
how does it howl, this miracle of technology
You could go from driving on the ground to air travel with some modifications.
efficiency??? basically, if aerodynamics is not the main scope one can fly a door with a powerful power motor. Same goes for fancy blades like this one.
I'm skeptical. Flying a light prototype is one thing. Scaling this up to the size and weight for 2-3 passengers is going to be a huge challenge. I expect they will be going for investors based on this prototype.
The ability to change the direction of thrust without turning the propeller is obviously the main scope of the mission. They probably didn’t think that they needed to explain it to anyone
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m this concept also have spoilers or fins inside that rotating drum and they tilt them also . in this design the fins are parallel to the axis of rotation. i think you have get the whole idea wrong.
How it will move towards? Not shown
Unfortunately, there are few who work fruitfully in this direction. But the fact that this team is working on creating a cyclogyro even according to the old aerodynamic design of 1909 is also very cool!
How much more power does it take. What happens if there is a problem with one or two of the rotors
Working on magnus effect vehicle for senior design and cant tell you one rotor going outs gonna mean a crash and a hard one at that(hard dive to a corner and flip over). Also definitely requires more power than a standard prop plane of equivalent size bc the rotors have to provide the lift whereas a prop plane the forward motion creates a lift. What I'm curious to see here is how they achieve a somewhat efficient directional motion seeing as the rotors mostly just provide lift.
Снизу надо колесики приделать все таки, удобнее будет
At least they are honest about the noise - which seems to be not extremely loud.
Are the going to develop a larger model for the second test pilot? LOL
Is this something that could be added to an electric car to improve high speed handling?
Can we see it fly out of ground effect?
This is very inspiring!
Man, imagine formula eVTOL racing.. crazy !!
This was on the covers of magazines like Popular Science 100 years ago.
So
amazing 🤪🤪🤪🤪
What are the advantages of this type of lift? Is it just a gimmick or does it have real value?
Highly efficient and strong wind resistance.
great. what are the benefits compared to the propeller?
quieter and more efficient apparently
Less carnage
災害救助に使ったらいいと思うヘリだとローターの関係で着地出来ない場所があるそれを踏まえると多様性のあるビークル輸送、移動、救助救援機器である
its also compact so its perfect when making flying cars.
@@user-jh6ik1qd7p Not really, if anything making drone based 'flying cars' is a terrible design choice in terms of energy efficiency. Forward travelling aircraft like planes are much more efficient as they use lift and forward motion to keep them in the air whereas you must be using a high rate of power from quad rotors to be able to move slowly. While yes, it makes sense for compact areas where short take off and landings are needed, in any range its better to use a car or train, or take a plane
Next step, hide the rotors inside the frame and you have a futuristic flying car with no wings or visible propellers. F35 vtol style
1:54 it does work.
I have similar approach. Would like to team up. Mine is a little different
Good luck in making this thing quite 😕
Cyclo blades are quieter than conventional blades
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m maybe, but it's sound exactly like air strike alarm. no one will want this sing fly over their neghborhood
Quiet
How do you get forward flight?
If they come to America or UK sell it to a big company they will have these flying around in a few years. It gets rid of the biggest issue the rotar. If it had some real funding it may do somthing cool.
Edit. Crazy that the CZcams Short that some dude made about this thing has more views by probably millions then this whole page has...Thats how i thought to look this up crazy.
So cars with wheels will fly in the future
If you lose one spool, the fall will be immediate. By reducing the wing length, noise increases. It is unlikely that the development will reach civilian use
Actually if three of the wheels are strong enough it could technically stay up. Unlike a quadcopter.
If by lose one spool you mean one motor on one rotor breaks, there's an easy way to mitigate that risk.
Simply link the rotors together with axels to a single motor (or tandem motors for redundancy) and a drive shaft with a transfer case like an AWD car
Put this on top of gondalas for flying homes
Jetzt schon veraltet !
Bro is so smart and he couldn't use common sense to sound natural whenever he was speaking about the product.... He made it very obvious he was reading of the teleprompter when he spoke.. like if he was having a conversation and doesn't know what his next word spoken will be
He’s an engineer not a public speaker. He’s still smart
Супер!
It's a car as well 😮
これ、ヘリウム気球の飛行船にも良いのでは？
揚力体構造とフィルム太陽電池とか組み合わせ長時間滞空や、大型貨物の山岳運搬とか、夢が拡がります。
Sounds like a huge vacuum cleaner
Все хорошо, только а чем преимущества над обычным пропеллером? Те же яйца, только в профиль...
Ok. Start and landing works. Now bring it to "Mr Steele" 's backyard for real flighttesting... 😂
That doesn't sound like 59db. Check out what Joby has done with its propellers.
you should call them Spinners
Euer LKW steht gerade vor unserem Haus! Hat das was zu bedeuten???? Testet ihr bei uns?
How loud is this Machine? Sounds ear breaking
I think that solid state batteries are the key to make this a comercial product
Maybe make it inducted like edf motor
that thing looks like it struggles to stay in the air and if it had to carry that test pilot it would fall 🤣
You can turn it upside down, drive it on road too 😂
格好良い。 「空飛ぶ車」って、マルチローターじゃなくてこういうビジュアルであってほしい。
I have a dream to learn like you. I want to create one, can anyone teach me?