Ukrainian counteroffensive infographic - June
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 07. 2023
- Sources:
deepstatemap.live/
www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02...
www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02...
Nerves Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
Devastation and Revenge Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
Prelude and Action Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
Weird to see a Eastory video without voice-over.
at first i tought it was a tigerstar video for the lack of narration.
Ok, next time there will be some commentary
@@Eastorycool thank you !
Keep up with the good work !
@@Eastoryi dont mind it do whatever u want
@@Eastorymake more about Ukraine pls
Really makes you understand the term War of Attrition
yup
So atrittion is: fighting with sheer men and a back and fourth of fighting arround the frontlines?
I'd like to see a video of confirmed artillery losses. This seems focused on tanks and armored vehicles.
The artillery battle is not really covered by anyone. This is somewhat peculiar, as it is the most significant weapon type in this particular theatre. Lack of access to each side's rear?
czcams.com/video/X1jXn9c52tk/video.html
only when war is over, and years pased, we will know the real casualties.
Senators Rand Paul (GOP) and Kennedy (democratic) says the same, ukrainian loses are very-very-very heavy. perhaps they will colapse by sept.-nov? we´ll see.
@@ThePRCommander it’s not the most attractive kind of thing to photograph and document, especially losses. Also logistical intel tends to be sparse as well due to the same reasons
@@ThePRCommanderyou can find it in statistical form
I don't know about taking these numbers as gospel, oryx only has visually confirmed losses so the picture we're getting is only partial at best. It's still nice to see the trends as it becomes clear on which day either side was attacking.
Oryix has been a cope source for NAFO r words since day 1
@@RCx44 Oryx has been the only reliable source for visually confirmed losses throughout the entire conflict. You wanna talk about 'cope'? Let's talk about all the Vatniks coping by claiming half of Russia's losses on Oryx are 'duplicates' (they aren't)
@RCx44
Russians post videos of destroyed farming equipment to try and claim kills.
There's no good reasons to believe that destroyed vehicles from Russia are overrepresented.
What's really a cope is trying to calculate casualties based on how many artillery rounds are fired by either side.
@@RCx44so what was the russian cope source then?
Это война пропаганды. Украина выдаёт потери 1/1 а Россия 1/5 или 1/10 в пользу Украины.
Но обе стороны скорее врут, и реальные цифры где-то посередине. То есть где-то 1/2 - 1/3 по людским потерям и возможно ближе 1/1.5 по технике в пользу Украины.
This is beginning to feel like WW1. Enormous amounts of losses are required to gain such small territory. Both sides prepared for so long, both are ready and neither of those two won’t surrender. As Clausewitz illustrated this 200 years ago, each country putting more war effort tend to push the other to follow him and increase his involvment into the conflict, and so on, until total war is reached.
Goes to show that more mobile technology doesn't mean more mobile warfare. The same technology in one theater can make a mobile front while in another it makes a static front. And this goes back to the very beginning of warfare in history.
Well, I don't think Ukraine is really prepared for too long. If any leading GOP member of the United States, one of the biggest backers of the Ukraine war, enters office, then Ukraine is probably going to have to concede the Donbass and north Toreador, because they already have lost so many men and their soviet stockpile of tanks and other equipment is beginning to dry up. Russia's economy has bounced back from the beginning of the war, so I feel like Ukraine isn't going to last in the long term.
TL;DR
USA might pull support out from Ukraine in 2025 leading to peace treaty between Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine cannot stand alone, and support from just the EU isn't enough.
@@newytrecomends4318 Russians will just throw thousands of troops to get what they want, just like in every war they were involved. A peace treaty will occur, surely Russia won’t accept any territorial losses, but this war is beginning to be a loss for both sides and it’s allies. As Clausewitz said, victory happens to the one who holds for the longest period of time
jomini>clausewitz
Cool video, you should continue doing this. Felt odd though with no sfx for the first minute tho
Yeah I restarted the video 2 times because I thought there was some glitch lol
@@freddekl1102 same! 😂
@@freddekl1102same
Your source refused to geolocate some of the footage, so there may be inaccuracies.
Such is the reality of reporting on a front of the battle with only 1month to make it.
I mean, everything you see online about the war is just to give you a general idea or ball park of what is happening. Nothing concrete at all, from any source.
Эти данные взяты с Орикса, поэтому они ничтожны.
@@Kondratey_Afinagenov I'm too lazy to translate this
I can't hear any sound. Is it a problem with my earphones, my computer or the video?
EDIT: music seems to start at 0:35
I think this is just part of the video, it starts at the same time for me as well.
Срочно к доктору, лор не сможет, к психологу..
Yes, there is no commentary for this video.
How tf they lose less equipment than Russia when they're on the offensive?
On some days they lose more when they are on an offensive. But when they capture a trench line, the russians attempt a counter-offensive and they lose equipment on those failed attacks. Both sides are literally attacking each other daily, so more or less both sides are taking equal loses until one side taps out from this battle.
That’s what I said. He’s taking the source from visually confirmed it should be in big red caps so people know. We have way more access to pro Ukrainian footage in the west because that’s what they want us to see and Russian media is heavily censored from sanctions and such so its way harder to find Russian footage unless its on open sources on things like telegram that don’t censor anything so it only makes sense that we see more picture of Russian equipment because that’s what’s being funneled into western media
@@canadious6933source : trust me😊
@@canadious6933who tf gonna believe that? In this counter offensive moment ukraine lose so many ifv apc and tanks, then where did this fckin 200s number come? 😂
@@mattbanco4406russian footage is available. Even they concede that they're doing pretty poorly in ongoing artillery duels. Drones are wrecking havoc
I highly doubt Russian losses. The defending side that is well dug in just doesn’t loose more than the attacker
Russia has been conducting offensive action during this time period though, no? They're not just defending. Also the video cites Oryx, which requires visual evidence for losses (photo/video).
They also counter-attack for every lost inch of ground so that’s why there are high losses for Russia
What did you expect? They only rely on ukrainian source.. they should cover source from both side to see the bias
They have many more vehicles and howitzers, that's why its easier for us to spot more of them. You should always look at %
I guess
@@fabiusm7763 conducting offensive? Not here, but elsewhere it has, but when the Russians do counterattack then it's mostly infantry assault squads. And do you really trust Oryx? The same website that counted Arma 3 videos as Russian losses? I'd rather trust the UA MoD numbers than Oryx.
I thought Russia has lost 1 milion equipment, and 30 milion manpower. Lol
tbh i expected 2-1 or even 3-1 in loss of equpment since Russians are on defensive. It's really bad stat.
3-1 ratio could only be taken literally in the late 19th century. Now it's more about overall combat power - fires, transport, morale, reconnaissance etc
@@buckplug2423 ukraine can't be that better than Russia to do that lol. it just cant.
@@Filip-dg6uk Losses aren't proof of who's better or worse. It's a matter of doctrine. The Ukrainians don't attack in the same way the Russians did in Bakhmut or during the early days. First, they target surrounding ammo depots, communication centers, command centers and vehicles in order to set the conditions for an assault. Then, they shell the positions. Then they attack, assuming it's not a thunder run. The Ukrainians are much more conservative when it comes to men and equipment and for good reason - they don't have hundreds of tanks to spare.
The Russians on the other hand want to hold the line at all cost and thus throw vicious counterattacks to dislodge Ukrainian attackers from their newly taken ground. And it works - but at a cost.
What I'm saying is the Ukrainians don't throw an attack after an attack once they see it won't work. The Russians do and they have shown this time and time again in Vuhledar or Bakhmut.
@@Filip-dg6ukit can, when you account for differences in tactics. Ukr has a very limited number of heavy and light vehicles/tanks and uses them more sparingly. It’s forced to rely more on infantry as a result. Ru has the opposite problem. Their units are under manned and spread thin. They have been seen to be more careless about losing vehicles/tanks.
that doesn't make sense russia is on the defensive and they don't use that much armor unlike Ukraine who's desperate for a breakthrough so how is russia loosing more equipment
Propaganda man... Just plain old propaganda. Logic has really gone out of the window at this point
Probably counterattacks to try an regain lost positions, sometimes those are successful and other times not.
Because if they didn't use armour they'd quickly crumble. A static defense is incredibly susceptible to breakthroughs, since when the enemy breaks the line in one point they can easily surround the remainder of the line and push further. Armour in Russian defensive tactics is used in two ways. The first, as per the Motor Rifle Battalion manual, is when tanks are used to provide direct support to defending troops and are (doctrinally) dug in and concealed, providing much needed direct fire onto the attackers. It's much, much easier to destroy infantry with a few HE shells from a 125 mm gun than it is trying to rely on artillery and small arms alone. The other way is by mobile defense, where mechanized units are kept in reserve and counterattack any enemy breakthroughs to contain the overall offensive. This puts them on the offensive and if the attackers manage to prepare for the counterattack properly they can repel it, inflicting casualties on the reserve force.
Another thing that's typical for this war is the use of artillery to strike enemy forces in the rear, usually by drone or GPS or laser guided 155/152 shells.
These numbers are not accurate.
They are all Eastory has to work with, so no blame on him. But these numbers come from heavily biased sources that are more interested in spreading propaganda than accurate statistics.
The numbers are definitely "fudged". Some of the equipment reported lost has not even arrived at the battle lines yet.
One thing that seems telling to me is that there is a *lot* of video of Ukrainian armour being destroyed, but very little video of Russian armour getting hit. That strongly indicates that Ukrainian losses are higher than Russian, though it proves nothing.
The kremlinbots arrived, yay!
Полный бред, у стороны которая обороняется имеет превосходство в авиации и артиллерии больше потерь чем у атакующей у которой даже нету превосходства в воздухе
Which side are you talking about?
@@Bad-HumorRussians
Thanks for another great and informative banger!
The Russian attack on Vuhledar and the Ukrainian attack on Robotyne show us just how entrenched both sides already are. If you really want to achieve a breakthrough you need to commit a disproportionate amount of units, which neither side are strategically speaking able to do
Russia is, but their generals are just too dumb
but while russia can rebuild it armour, ukraine can', they need the permission of USA
No need to have a disproportionate amount of units. It's been needed to overshot the minefields with cluster munitions, so the infantry can proceed ahead
@@jutlandthegodRight, thats the tactic the Ukrainian army adopted soon after the start of the offensive. Which I think is a really good move. But the objective is then no longer to get behind Russian lines and envelop them, instead the objective is more to weaken the Russian lines to the extent that they can be pushed back more easily. If this pushback reaches strategic areas like Vasilyvka, Tokmak or Polohy, maybe then the offensive can start gaining speed due to the strategic need for Russian troops to withdraw to more defensible positions.
@@buiquanghuy7589 Not really true, a German manufacturer is opening a tank plant in Ukraine in the next couple of months.
This is a meaningless infographic due to the use of a one-sided sources. Did the attackers suffer fewer losses than the side with the defensive advantage? Nonsense. This does not correspond to the logic of war, which the author so often mentions.
That’s what I said like a month ago and I can’t find my comment anymore. It literally doesn’t make any logical sense that the Russians are losing Waymore than Ukrainians it’s just impossible based on the circumstances there in pre-designated fortified defenses with complete fire control along their entire front line with mines, ditches wire, pill boxes trenches, everything that gives them the advantage yet they’re are still losing more like am I missing something here do the Ukrainians just destroy Russian equipment at will simply by looking at it because they’re the good guys and have plot armor or something 😂
Or have you considered that the sources are bias? @@AndrewStevens-cd5jr
The attackers can lose less and the defenders can lose more, it's not a universal fact
apparently entire convoys of MRAPS didnt make it onto the list
And the Western sources like to count any destroyed Soviet equipment as a Russian loss despite Ukraine using a lot of it
@@fgkuv5232 that’s the main problem with using oryx this channels source it misrepresents equipment all the time all you have to do is be familiar with each sides identifying markings and type of equipment used and after a few minutes of looking you’ll find mistakes
Ukraine getting their asses handed to them during this offensive ... They will have to accept that they cannot retake all their former territory.
i really doubt those numbers
It might be that he's showwing visibly confirmed losses instead of the losses claimed by either side.
I'm not sure if I can take any of these losses seriously on neither side.
According to Ukraine, these are the loses. No Russian sources where taken into account here.
@@enterchannelname5953cuz when HIMARS arrived to Ukraine russian military command was telling that they destroyed 48 HIMARS systems when in reality Ukraine had only 12 so no one takes russian sources seriously anymore?
@@enterchannelname5953 Anything and everything that Russia says is a fucking lie anyway. They are all born liars.
@@ArmyJames They are all born liars. Said liar. ))
Took you till August 2023 to realize eh?
You present it like the turnaround in lost equipment means that the tide has turned in the Ukrainian counteroffensive. But it's a widely reported on fact that due to high losses in vehicles in the first weeks Ukrainians started using less armor and more infantry. This means while their armor losses declined due to simply having only a few vehicles involved, their manpower losses skyrocketed and their advance became even slower than before (virtually halted).
Ukraine has lost a whole army corps in 2 months of stubborn and senseless attack against prepared defenses in deep that create an echeloned Огневой мешок (Firezone). They are now employing their second army corps of that sector. They do not have a third one...They are facing very dense minefields, that IF and WHERE they can overcome, are immediately recreated behind their advancing path with remote mining system ISDM (and that complicates their ability both to feed the offensive and evacuate the wounded, therefore increasing the number of soldiers killed). When Ukrainian equipment is damaged by mines,Russian artillery, loitering munitions Lancets and FPV, ATGM and most of all …helicopters (!) destroy them.
When necessary Russian leaves their trenches (that are mined and full of boobytraps) and fall back. Ukrainians occupy those trenches just in time to explode on mines and booby traps and then Russian artillery force them to leave under a hail of fire. The result is an advance of 10km out the 100 km necessary at the price as said of a whole army corp destroyed (some 40 thousands killed !).
And we are on the 66th day of an offensive that was supposed to last 16.
And the destruction of the second (and last in that sector) army corps is in full swing.
@@lukasfontana7589 proofs?
@@MaddoScientisto-fb3kb Western media.
Washington Post, CNN, Wall Street Journal, Economist, Repubblica...Just look for "stalled counteroffensive" on Google and you can read plenty of articles. And when you read cryptical words like "untold thousands of killed" or an article where they talk about between 20 and 50 thousands amputees on the Ukrainian side, you can have an idea of what is going on.
@@MaddoScientisto-fb3kb trust me bro
@@Shrek_ua the most credible Vatnik source
highly inaccurate, perhaps you are worried that CZcams will remove this video if you actually had shown true casualty counts for the Ukrainian armed forces, and this would include infantry losses which seem to be over 30 thousand by now. you should perhaps keep focusing on old wars...
And over 30 mil by now, cope more
He simply uses numbers he can find. Of course it will be inaccurate, he's not at the frontlines seeing what's happening.
"Stupid westoid, I only trust highly accurate Russian sources which claim to have shot down x3 times the amount of existing Bayraktars which have ever been sent in Ukraine."
vatnik cope
просто интересно, где же, по твоему, РФ потеряла столько бмп и бтр ? В мясных штурмах?
"Slower advance, larger russian losses"
- I seriously doubt that
Believe it or not, it makes some sense.
Currently, if Ukraine attacks somewhere, Russia will try to counterattack the next day, then the fight becomes bogged down, and eventually stops, until Ukraine launches another offensive somewhere else at the front. Especially north of Bakhmut and around Staromajorske, Russia has thrown a lot of men and material at any Ukrainian advances to try and push them back to their earlier positions.
Generally, this tactic has worked for russia, because Ukraine has not managed to gain much ground anywhere, while russia can always prepare new defensive lines while their counterattack is ongoing. They do lose equipment, but it seems to be bearable for Russia. North of Bakhmut they´ve managed to push the Ukrainians out of Berkhivka after they managed to enter the village, and around Staromajorske they´ve also managed to negate the small tactical ukrainian victories multiple times during june.
Also, eastory has not shown the northern front between Torske and Kupiansk, in this area, russia was on the offensive and a lot of their equipment losses are probably from that sector of the front, not from the three sectors shown in the video.
One has to keep in mind, that this is all just pre-skirmishes. Ukraine tried a bigger offensive once in early june, it failed, and since then, all they´ve done is trying to secure better tactical positions for a second try and pounding the russian defences with everything they´ve got. Two days ago, their second big offensive started, their goals seem to be the reconqest of Tokmak south of Robodyne and the conqeust of the villages around Bakhmut. We´ll see, how their second attempt will end, it looks like they´ve prepared better this time, but so far, Ukraine has not managed to breach the main russian defensive line in the south anywhere.
Meanwhile, Russia is continuing it´s own smaller offensive in the north, it´ll also be interesting to see, how this ends. Their goal there will obviously be the conquest of Kupiansk and the eastern side of the oskil river.
@@teutonicterror0365this is cope to the highest degree. Attackers generally take larger losses unless they have overwhelming firepower and air support, which AFU doesn’t have… ofc the Teuton is claiming victory over the Slav
@@youngandbankrupt1101 yet russian bots will insist that during the battle of bakhmut ukraine was taking huge loses compared to russia and backhmut was a "russian trap" XD
@@forgerfalscher2125 because Russian forces had and still have - and even more today - overwhelming firepower superiority. In every aspect: from any tipe of ground vehicles, artillery, to aviation and helicopters. Also, Russian troops had better communications, heavy equipment, on average, and urban warfare expertise and experience on their side. Just like more experienced officer corps.
@@unwantedvoid1678
>Russian forces
>expertise
Choose one
Would love to see more of this type of content @Eastory. It gives a good idea of the difficulty of the counteroffensive, against an enemy that had months to prepare and that has completely dug in.
Согласен время было.Но оно было потому ,что Укараина целый год болтала о наступлении и не проводила его
Actually the situation is that a fascist government that harbors ethnic hate against it's own people if they are of Russian descent is funded by the tens of billions of US $$ to send conscripts to slaughter for some ideologues in DC. Graphic that.
@@danilzamaliev2205о, эксперт в комментах 😅 и ничего что за это время Украина освободила множество территорий, как минимум Херсон
@@villiamkost5095 украина говорила о наступлении на запорожье во первых,вовторых херсон фактически сдали сами рф,никто так и не понял почему нельзя было создать поближе к Херсону линию лбороны и иметь плацдарм
Харьковское направление такой же вопрос,почему не было создано линии обороны и поздно проведена мобилизация.
Если бы не проблемы в руководстве победы всу в 2022 году были бы не такими масштабными ,мобилизацию можно было начать и в апреле-мае 22г
@@danilzamaliev2205 1) верно, их вынудили отступить с большими потерями, сами по доброй воле никто не отступает, а то я вижу ты склонен верить телевизору, так же как и со всеми другими освобожденными направлениями, россияне обосрались и отступили. 2) если бы да ка бы.... Ладно, вижу этот глупый спор не имеет смысла, ты главное побольше телевизора смотри, а то не дай бог ещё анализировать информацию начнёшь
Seeing these losses, can we calculate the average life expectancy of tank crew in this war? Has it gone up since WWII (3 weeks)?
Tank cure can survive even if tank itself is damaged. It is especially true about western tanks & IFV. So, it is hard to calculate such numbers using open source data.
Moreover, most of the tanks that was damaged using landmines, can be pulled back and repaired OR be trophied by another side.
A Russian tanker survival is 8x higehr than a Russian infantryman, this statistics is the same for most armies.
losses in this video included damaged equipment.
There seems to be a typo as "Phase lI" is declared twice with no "Phase I" summed up whatsoever.
These losses are very wrong and biased.
@@enterchannelname5953 tell source for real losses pls
I would like to ask if similar animations on maps can be done using addobe animate?
Would be interested to know how many of these are specifically kamikaze drones or drone drop kills, on both sides. It must be impressively high.
kamikaze drones? u mean attack drones?
Не посчитаешь
Most of these losses are inflicted by drones spotting for artillery or kamikadze/munition drop drones. This is because it is usually recorded in the footage. I can't say from the top of my head, what the proportion is among them.
Drones are excellent weapons, but not really for destruction, rather for reconnaisance. 99% of losses are due to artillery even in modern warfare. I would be interested in how many of those barages were directed by drones.
@@justacat2 yes, my bad, sry. Attack drones. I just thought of these Iranian drones while writing it, that’s all. But yeah, generally attack drones I meant 👍 I guess both (kamikaze & those dropping explosives) should be called attack drones, but whatever you got what I meant overall.
Please try to use more independent sources. Oryx isn’t even good the guy who runs it does part time as a hobby.
This may be controversial but, most Russian losses, wich happen in the Shouth of Bachmut are damaged vehicles that are recovered and repaired, while most Ukrainian losses are not recoverable, this is not counted but I think its also important to take into account, its not the same hitting logistics with light drones than a artillery strike or a minefield
The source of information?
@@bjooelsd4752 Most of the cassualties in the Zaporizia front are from artillery and heavy drones wich tend to destroy more often rather than damage, these are also in a position were recovering them is quite hard as Russian artillery controls the area, in the Bachmut front most losses come from Ukrainian light drones wich often tend to just damage the vehicle after wich it can be repaired and sent back to the frontline
@@adamelestratega ok I understand))) still, what is the source of information? You got any documented proofs? If no your words worth nothing, sry.
@@bjooelsd4752 Its a logical analysis, if you want some videos of destroyed Ukrainian vehicles in minefields vs some Russian ones by light drones you can perfectly search it, sry.
Really? That's not what I've heard - supposedly vast majority of Bradley crews survived and the vehicles were more recoverable than Eastern equipment.
I would like to see a video of something like the world war 2 series you did 5 years ago
This video is proof we're living in an era of fantasy normalization
What do you mean by that?
@@kung-borean30 I think he means this video proves we're living in an era of fantasy which has been normalized.
It’s all propaganda, nothing shown in this video has anything to do with reality.
Interesting how Ukraine has lower losses, even while attacking!
They don't. It's more cope. God forbid if people ever find out how many Ukrainian losses there are they'd want this war to end and we can't have that.
@@CyrilSneer123 Well I think it's not wrong as numbers are visually confirmed.
But Ukraine has ofc. MANY more human losses.
Ukraine is preparing for more mobilizations and even starting to recruit people who are unfit such as people with: HIV, Tuberculosis, Epilepsy, Panic attacks.
Additionally Ukraine reported they don't have enough Russian prisoners to exchange for Ukrainians.
@@SangiinKherem Visual confirmation is only good if someone takes a picture. Ukraine started out with large mechanised assaults that got slaughtered in minefields and arty. Human losses reflect vehicle losses so as Ukraine has lost considerably more men it figures that the vehicle loss would be a similar loss ratio. Ukraine don't march into battle they use vehicles.
@@CyrilSneer123 They lost barely vehicles, look at confirmations only 50 bradley out of which only 10 deatroyed.
16 leopards 6 leopards destroyed rest damaged
Besides the picture argument goes for both sides, both Ukraine and Russia have more losses. Doesn't change anything about the fact that Russia loses more vehicles.
Also does not include artillery, Russia is losing more artillery
@@SangiinKheremproblem is that eastory only uses pro-ukrainian sources like oryx which is pretty unreliable as others pointed that out. he should've also looked to Lostarmour which also documents loses. And another thing is that aviation srikes are unidentifiable, or disregarded.
Great job on this video.
Interesting rundown!
it's genuinely sad to see Eastory unironically using Oryx as a source.
What can he do, questioning Oryx, ESPECIALLY with evidence, will get you swamped with NAFO trolls reporting you as Russian disinformation. When NATO Govs even quote Oryx there is no way it can remain objective, it HAS to make NATO look superior or it will be attacked by NATO propaganda itself. Probably why the main Oryx guys who started it have now quit.
yea so sad to use the most reliable source. stop being biased and accept russia is getting their ass whooped.
@@Marcus-ip7hldoesn't seem like it, especially not in this video atleast
@@ishechinyoka3858 is there a reason it doesn't seem like it except for ur own personal bias?
А как ты программируешь войну с анимация
How many pows inthe eastern front (both sides)?
1м+
Could you make a video about Bakhmut's battle so far?
What Bakhmut battle 'so far'?
That shit ended like 2 months ago man. Just look at Ukrainian sources. No one with any seriousness is claiming Bakhmut is even in the picture at this point regardless of what one may want to believe
@@anon-san2830 Dude is still ongoing...
@@micman96Ukraine has been pushed back in May.
@@micman96from Artevmosk
@@enterchannelname5953 Then why AFU are advancing from city's flanks? Battle for it is still ongoing
Leopard 2A8s??? Ukraine only got 2A4, 5 and 6 1:23
And 2A7 at 1:45? Ukraine didn't get any of those either
k wonder what's the sources he use
Yeah oryix is a shit source should be obvious to anyone not overdosing on copium
the author has already responded to a similar comment, admitting his oversight, read this
Cool vid I love this channel
Hi-res shaded topos, very cool enhancement.
Looks like this channel has sold-out, or been co-opted as well, shame.
Russian shill
Keep up the good work, Eastory ❤️
Keep these videos man
You know shit gets serious in life when you hear this background music start playing. 0:30
MAXIMUM CAUSUALTIES EXPECTED
Can anyone tell the background music used in 0:50
Kevin MacLeod: Nerves. But its also in the video description lol
07.06...little typo...Leo 2A6 instead of 2A8
I have no idea, how this happened. Thanks! :)
@@Eastory happens to the best :)
This puts in perspective how slow the war really is. This can go on forever with no end in sight.
Absolutely no. Losing 20k killed and 6k disabled per month, Ukrainians can't last forever.
It won't
nobody tell him
It would be if ukraine had direct military aid by nato, but they don't, so in a year or so they'll either run out of manpower, weapons, funding, war support, political stability, or a combination of the above and will be forced to sign peace.
Source: trust me bro
lostarmour much better source
He even posted the sources in the video description.
@@Intreductor oryx suck
@@Intreductoroyrix isn't a source.
oryx is literally the most believable source right now. everything that people criticise oryx for can be applied to any source, while the other ones rarely provide so much evidence.
Wow 😮, please make US foreign Wars 2.0 video?
Wait so are these losses only from these sectors of the front or everywhere?
He says everywhere.
Why Russian advance near Kupyansk aint shown?
Because name of video is Ukrainian offensive
This is June, Russian offensive began in July.
Great video. I was worried that I would miss stuff happening in all of the different views, but the frontlines moving and leaving a white area showing the change was a perfect fix that helped me not miss anything.
You've still missed everything, and probably know just about nothing about this war.
Scale.
You missed the scale. The amount of land taken is small. To the point of being insignificant.
The lives lost to gain a couple kilometres of land is not small, though. But that is insignificant to the shot-callers like Zelenski.
@@pkz420 How about the several 100k lives lost by Russia for a completely unnecessary and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine? But I suppose those lives are insignificant to the imperialist shot-caller like Putin. Ohh yeah, let's not forget the many 100ks of Russians who fled the country in 2022.
But yeah, of course. Russian propaganda says the west are economically starved, are freezing to death without Russian gas and are full of nazis. I live such a terrible oppressed life in the west and I definitely almost froze to death last winter. Life is tough in the west without the holy Russian gas.
@@pkz420question, how well do you think Europe faired when Germany invaded it? do you think the loss of life was not worth it in the end? just trynna understand people who blame zelenskey before they blame putin.
The love of Europeans for the Goebbels is incomprehensible. The brainlessness of an entire region is a terrible catastrophe for the entire planet.
Bro where is the sound?
Please Remaster your Eastern Front series🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
As a long time fan of the channel, this video just sucks. Sorry. I have no idea what is happening. Why not 3 videos describing each axis with commentary? The content is here basically, mapped but the arrangement and the lack of any commentary just makes this an uncomfortable video to watch. Love your channel, loved every video you did but this sucks. Sorry.
+++
Because he's embarrassed to speak the words he knows are not true.
@@harblewarble6427 Sad that you aren't
@boilingpoint760 impartiality!? First video is just fully pro-west narrative, nothing about reality
Coud you pls do a vidio about palestine hammas attacks on israel and also
He is probably gonna work on one later
thanks for the update
Good job!
Excpect both numbers to be higher. Especially the Ukrainian numbers.
Especially Russian numbers since Russia stopped counting.
@@Intreductor Russia is now the defender. Except in the Svatove Kremina front.
These are visually confirmed losses, real losses are excpected to be somewhat higher.
@@BromTeque Agree.
I honestly doubt a lot of Russian equipment losses are accurate. Especially before the offensive no Ukrainian losses were reported. And also The 13th 21st, 23rd and 29th of June, those feels very much propaganda numbers especially that Russia somehow lost more vehicles than Ukraine while they were on the defense. Regardless, good video.
Wait before you discover how utterly shit the Russian military is, maybe then you'll understand why and how they lose a disproportionate amount of equipment. Gullible fool.
Russians are mainly losing equipment due to HIMARS
It’s really not a good video when it is giving details on both sides that are almost certainly highly inaccurate.
Russia has also had a chronic shortage of men to properly man the equipment they have, causing problems where Russia has plenty of tanks and armored vehicles, but no infantry to support them, leaving them susceptible to Ukrainian infantry equipped with simple anti tank weapons
@@dylanelliott-bd8ix Ukraine isn’t better equipped than Russia. And that doesn't constitute more losses if the enemy isn't using their tanks that much.
Did you lose your voice or something? You used to speak in this stuff
Pls make July and August
Интересная мысль у автора - Россия обороняется, ВСУ не доходят до первой линии обороны, теряя кучу техники, но потерь у России больше...
Потому что реально больше, посмтори откуда взяты данные
@@ManhettenTransferИз deep.state? Серьёзно?
@@ManhettenTransferИз проукраинского орикса...
Last month the media told me Russia is out of missiles, and this month Joe Biden claimed he knew the outcome of the war already. Do they think we are stupid? Lol
Biden 2022: we will bleed Russia's reserves.
Biden 2023: Our ammo is running low and we are on the brink of default.
yes they do and most people are unlike you
Well, maybe change your media then to get a more balanced view on events.
Nigga you all ain't even making sense
No, they don't think we're all stupid! They know there are a majority of people stupid enough to believe them.
And that's all you need to rule a democracy!
Very well done.
And this is just June.
Yeah, this is not up to your usual standard, unfortunately.
Nobody with any expertise thinks we can give figures like this with any sort of accuracy - this is mostly arbitrary and artificial, and so serves very little real value (and quite possibly a negative one, by giving an impression we know more than we do.
What do you mean? They are visually confirmed destroyed?
yeah ukraine losing fewer armored vehicles for basically the whole time frame of the offensive is extremely sus
All of these losses have been visually verified
@@donkdump8807And what of all the loses that have not been visually verified?
@@Zveebo they aren't included, which probably gives Ukraine an advantage but it's not massive
Lostarmour also count (with photos/videos) near 160 lost venicles by ukaraine, and this is much better source
Also, i didnt see looses from 8 june here, then ukrains in this atack lost 2 tank and 6 maxpro (today was video)
Is it just me that gets 0 voice audio? Just the background music??
cool video but why didnt you speak in video like in other videos?
czcams.com/video/YkjlQrV5brw/video.html Leopard 2 A8 ? In 2023, KMW announced that it will produce a new version of the Leopard 2 designated as the Leopard 2A8. This will be the first factory-new series of tanks for the German military since 1992. The first 18 units are expected to be delivered to the Bundeswehr in 2024. Thus, it is impossible for the A8 version to be found in Ukraine.
Probably a typo
it was 2A7, he accidentaly made mistake
Leopard 2A8? Those don't even exist yet
YPR-765s are underrated imo.
It's an ok video, but I missed the Eastory voice over.
By giving such numbers you are deliberately misleading your viewers.
No he’s not.
@@ArmyJames These numbers are unrealistic. If your IQ is higher than 100, you can't just believe that Ukraine always wins and Russians are incompetent in any situation and die in huge numbers. In addition, he shows that the Russians are losing so much tanks and AV, as if there are no minefields and a huge space to be overcome under the fire of Russian artillery, as if it is the Ukrainians who have access to aviation, and not the Russians.
i love you Eastory. Please more
You should make another videos
Why this counteroffensive is slower than expected?
Because we expected it to be like Kharkiv (complete victory out of nowhere), but it is like Kherson (slow burn until a sudden collapse)
Because in war, things rarely happen as expected.
Because people expected a lightning takeover because of the Kharkiv offensive. Go back 100 years and you will see that counteroffensives took time back then too.
Because everyone hoped it would be fast, but in fact it is quite difficult but possible to break through 5 lines of defense of trained Russians
@@42carlosну в целом ты прав. Но есть нюанс. Коллапс будет не с той стороны, с которой все ожидают.
Miss the Estonian accent
Where is the voice 😭😭😭
A interesting video but I need his voice because it sounds good oh and when I can't speak English so good I'm from Germany und damit einen schönen Abend noch
Данные взяты из украинских пабликов или на спиритических сеансах ?
да здесь собрались мамкины эксперты без критического мышления и и продукты уроботферм
@@UnSaturniда нет, просто они всю советскую технику любят в наши потери записывать и потом дрочить друг другу на это
@@fgkuv5232ахахахах, мистер проблема со зрением, ты принципиально не замечаешь потери совковой техники со стороны Украины на видео?)
sources: Readily available pro ukraine sources
Take the WW2 eastern front losses with a grain of salt too
(What if...
Kiev was just a dream)
Alright, prove they are wrong.
@@Intreductororyix has been pure cope from day 1
@@RCx44 Bruh you can't even spell it right, learn better English comrade.
@@RCx44 proof or you are coping yourself
Nice
THEREIS NO AUDIO BRO IN THE START THERE IS NO AUDIO…
When will Britain's Brilliant plans to win ww2 come out
they didn't have one. The british litterature on the spanish civil war is just one article copied from a french source. They REALLY couldn't fathom a war happening ever (again)
@@paulf3999 Honestly, do did everyone though. And it would never would have happened without the absurdity of the Nazi ideology. So I can't really blame politicians for doubting a second global war happening so soon after the first.
@@paulf3999 Late comment but what I meant was that Eastory "teased Britain's Brilliant Plan to win ww2" in this video czcams.com/video/S8KRgDGLqHE/video.htmlsi=AyhZgvNieOFu7j5E&t=23 but he never released it. Although one comment I found mentioned how the UK sent tons of propaganda leaflets to the Germans to try to demoralize them but it didn't work.
The losses for the Russians do seem sort of unrealistic as you specify visually confirmed losses. Well its hard to visually show a destroyed Russian take when their electronic warefare systems disable the majority of drones.
They dont.
Hmmmmm, if only there were some other way of taking pictures besides drones.
Pulled it out of your ass.
Excuse me you're breaking up a hohol cope session with your logic.
Maybe best to wait for the powder to dry on this conflict. Guesstimating is just as bad as politicizing IMHO,
For an infographic it was confusing.
I was just watching an update on the Ukraine 🇺🇦 / Russia 🇷🇺 conflict, wrote a comment, then clicked on here and noticed that comment was posted here...? Glad I looked or it would be awkward explaining it to anyone who asked but it's not the first time it's happened either so stay vigilant good people.
I adore the kids in the comments who have learned the mantra that the defending side suffers three times fewer losses and are now spreading it here.
Of course, why should we mention factors such as the advantage of concentrated force, artillery buildup, organizational presence, and so on?
And to those who mentioned aviation, I wish you to see how far Russian combat planes and helicopters are now stationed, the reasons for this, and their flight time to the front.
Russian organization:
czcams.com/video/DiHzW7xB1MY/video.htmlsi=PsFrBt101HrKXm7v
Informative, thank you.
TEH WALLZ R CLOSIN IN ON POOTIN
Biased video
This is completely unwatchable.
Please use your voice
You are extremely heplful in portraying the right amount of information in a video
You are part of the chanel and videos without your voice would be worse