Francis Fukuyama on the End of History | Munich Security Conference 2020
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 02. 2020
- Francis Fukuyama is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. He has written on democratization and international political economy, most popularly ‘The End of History and the Last Man’ and ‘Identity’. In our conversation with Francis Fukuyama at #MSC2020, he explains how he now contemplates the end of history and why the search for recognition is central to the crisis of the West.
_______________
Connect with us:
Twitter: / munsecconf
Facebook: / munsecconf
Instagram: / munsecconf
LinkedIn: / munsecconf
Scale is the key here. Dignity and respect can be restored to the losers of the globalization experiment once local economies can be restored and people feel that they play a vital role in their communities. Plus it would help temper the climate crisis.
Excellent lecture!
Excellent!
THE HISTORY NEVER ENDS
only till proverbial asteroid hits
you didn't listen to the guy did you ?
@@meneither3834 He might not have listened then simply shouted something in response to the title and moved on. But there is plenty of room to disagree with the speaker's views, has to be said.
@@davidsanderson5918 Certainly and yes.
Yeah it repeats
Mr Fukuyama struck the nail with this, I can agree more with his anamnesis of our todays society.
This video is really good.
hey franc , humble man
I would recommend this video to students
good
The biggest threat to democracy isn't communism but the average intelligence of the electorate.
Democracy has show itself to be a disaster for any civilization that has adopted it.
@Accelerationist Do you have some evidence and definitions to back that up? and if true, given that iq is influenced by environment what does it tell us that those most disadvantaged by the status quo are supporting alternatives?
@Accelerationist that was already an implicit assumption in my comment. what does that say about your reading comprehension or willingness to honestly engage in discussion?
@@shway1 You complain that people are not intelligent, especially communists, and yet your comments are clearly designed to niggle, provoke and belittle. Typical snotty CZcams/social media attitude. Take a look at your own comments...is that intelligent behaviour? I'm so tired of people who love to hate.
@@davidsanderson5918 wrong person?
Excellent summary
Fukuyama, experto en relaciones internacionales, vaticina en su teoría del “fin de la historia” el fin de la guerra; pero lo hace de palabra, siendo a la vez de facto uno de los más feroces impulsores de la guerra, de la guerra en su máxima expresión: la imperialista norteamericana desde la caída de la Unión Soviética hasta la actualidad, habiendo trabajado activamente al respecto para varias de las más atroces administraciones de EE. UU., como la de Regan, la de Clinton, la primera de Bush, la de Obama y, fuera del gobierno, apoyando y patrocinando sin descanso la intervención militar (firmando cartas donde se pide la Guerra de Afganistán, Irak etc), pero también la guerra encubierta y la no declarada, como es el caso de la justificación ideológica de Guerra de Ucrania en nuestros días, que es a lo que nos referíamos al inicio del video. [incluir video de misiles] En este último punto de su desarrollo, el neoconservadurismo de Fukuyama es tan extremado que ha alcanzado a apostar por el neonazismo, legitimando y promocionando al neonazi Batallón Azov desde la privilegiada plataforma de difusión que constituye la universidad de Stanford, el 29 de Junio de 2023. Francis Fukuyama se declaró “orgulloso de dar apoyo” al “movimiento Azov”, a cuyos integrantes califica de “héroes”. Poniendo seriamente en peligro la paz mundial y aproximando la posibilidad una guerra termonuclear. Así pues, y visto lo visto, su exclamación del “fin de la historia”, más que, según sus palabras: “el punto final de la evolución ideológica de la humanidad y la universalización de la democracia liberal occidental”, parece obedecer a una intención de hacerla acabar, forzosamente. Parece contradictorio, porque un año antes, la misma universidad de Standford publicó un documento llamado “Movimiento Azov”, donde lo definía como “una mezcla clásica de temas derechistas, incluyendo el antisemitismo, el etnocentrismo, la homofobia y el racismo”.
Really a political thinker
I'm going to buy his books.
My read on Mr Trumps domestic policy is that he is gearing up for a major buildout of American infrastructure. By deregulating and pulling down institutions into a state of flux he's able to negotiate trade deals and heavy hand to a negotiation."maybe"
I think the administrator after Trump is going to have a healthier house.
I've been looking for the modern "man" for some time ...
This aged well 😂😂
@@marquisdelafayette1929
The best laid plans of mice and men...
4 years short and a pandemic. If only....
Imagine writing something that's only influential because of how wrong it is
The Bible left the chat
@@rickysubutai296 good one bro 😎
@@rickysubutai296
Oh, edgy
Hot war is on now francis
He is such an expert in hindsight.
lol
Mr Fukuyama was wrong at that Hong Kong was under the rule of authoritarian . Hong Kong is free and have higher liberality on political area under stability as the rest of the high quality region on our planet .
The fail theory is always fail theory!!! Don't need to justify it or revisit it!!! THERE IS NO PREDICTION OF HUMAN AFFAIR!! SOME WISE MEN SAID!
Obviously you did not read his books. Read and judge:
THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL ORDER
POLITICAL ORDER AND POLITICAL DECAY
Idk going in politics of all places for recognition is weird to me. I mean half of people gonna hate you just because you're from a different party
Chinese style autocracy linked to a market economy seem to be competing with European style social democracy tied to a market economy.
We seem to all agree that a market economy is necessary though.
lol
YERLERİN VE GÖKLERİN VE HERŞEYİN SAHİBİ YÜCE ALLAH CC
ALLAHTAN BAŞKA İLAH YOKTUR
ALLAH KATINDA HAK DİN İSLAMDIR
MUHAMMED ALAHIN PEYGAMBERİDİR
GÜZEL İNSAN HUZUR ARIYORSAN HUZUR İSLAMDA
GÜZEL İNSAN MÜSLÜMAN OLMADAN CENNETE GİREMESSİN
I grew up in a working class estate at the height of the troubles in Northern Ireland 40 years ago, we had immigrants living in our street, African's, Dutch, Italian, even different genders we all got on great, we always had respect for our neighbors as we all struggled together, we all knew now difficult life was, even the Catholic and Protestant working class got along, it's the morally superior politicians, and religious leaders with their " onward Christian soldier" attitude, the liberals missed the mark, we always had respect for our fellow human, we didn't need it rammed down our throats. That's why the liberals hate Trump he sees that the working class have been left behind, even the Hispanics are voting for Trump, as we the working class know what struggle is and respect others who struggle the same.
You know, it was often said that Barak Obama was an empty vessel into which people poured their hopes and dreams. I sort of agree with this statement. But what's so odd is that Trump is this idea times 100. He is an utterly incompetent, narcissistic idiot that people pour not only their hope and dreams, but their moral philosophy, their sense of self worth, their hatreds, their lust, and every other part of their vague understanding of human condition into. Trump doesn't see anything. He is a self-indulgent son of a millionaire song-and-dance man, a painfully incompetent administrator in nearly every way, and a fictional creation of what Hollywood thinks a good businessman is. And yet, here we are. Now you are asserting that he is somehow a visionary who see's the profundity of class struggle and our shared common humanity.
Bro, hitch your wagon to someone else. Hitch your wagon to someone who is displays some modicum of competence and who actually displays some kind of understanding of what it is you think you want, rather than what you seem to be projecting onto the man.
@@malcolmw513 I'm from Ireland and like most yanks yous always telling everyone what to do, I was just commenting on how neo liberalism as in general, the Hispanics are generally a conservative people and their looking for stability. Plus the basic respect for others point of view, we don't need to be told who to respect and who to like, respect is earned not a god-goverment given right as the democrats with their WOKE identify politics, divide and conquer, race,gender,colour, anything goes in the USA, divide and conquer.
@@davydacounsellor You have me all wrong. I've endlessly voiced the point that a vast number of minority groups are inherently way more conservative than people assume, I think people need to be left alone to pursue a dignified life, and I have general contempt for anyone who claims to be "woke". But whatever I think about "liberal elitists", I demand more from my political leaders than an idiot savant whose only preternatural skill is "p0wning the libs". I don't throw my lot in with a con man just because he tweaks the people I hate. Have some respect for yourself.
No offence, but did you ask the Africans living on a working class estate in 1980s Northern Ireland, whether they felt respected by their neighbors? They probably felt different.
@@mshara1 what are you talking about "respect" we all respected each others point of view, your missing the point, the Africans who lived in our street in a 99.9% White town were fully respected and went on to do very well in life, able to climb the economic ladder and become very successful. We were all poor living hand to mouth, and the point everyone misses that we had dignity and respect for everybody's way of life. We also knew "respect is earned" not to be given away because of the colour of our skin. What your stating is that they felt disrespected, no but they/we had dignity, and we all respected that.
Can help you stop stealing from Philosophers you dont understand!? You keep stealing catchy phrases for marketing purposes...
10 minutes talkin without sayin anything
He calls Russia and China aggressive. If they are, what about his country? How we can call USA? Silly.
I think you're allowed to say that Russia and China are aggressive (which they are) without listing every other country that has displayed aggression.
Nicholas yes, but if your own country invaded last 50 years all around the world and is number one in this, how morally is to point to someone else without admitting the facts?
@@63plamen Because Russia and China are aggressive and Fukuyama doesn't make US foreign policy. What you're doing is called whataboutism.
you're only writting here freely because of the values defended by capialism, TARD!
@@63plamen invaded?
Islamic fundamentalism is going to annailate the world
Hegel, a great philosopher! all the rest philosophers and thinkers are mere naans which lay on his shoulder
Bullshit... Nietzsche's critiques, and philosophy, are enough to dismantle their philosophy. It may be too much truth though.
This video can destroy capitalism. And I hope it does. He's a PhD and I had to learn his theories for my fucking degree in economics. Existence of an individual called DONALD TRUMP refuted his theory about motivation of capitalists. Oh no, Trump apparently went bankrupt twice. That's it. He misjudged Trump. His theories are solid. He HAS a PhD. He is a RENOWNED SOCIOLOGIST, he is a Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. He has written on democratization and international political economy, most popularly ‘The End of History and the Last Man’ and ‘Identity’.
Bankruptcy doesn't really mean they are unsuccessful or poor. Bankruptcy is just a tool/trick used to reallocate wealth nowadays. Donald Trump is still a very successful capitalist, Fukuyama just fails to see that economics is not a main drive of conflict, culture is.
@@jcobtre Economics are a part of culture if we take its definition to be "practical framework for social reproduction". When people struggle they are more inclined to fight for survival. It's pure biology...
All neo-liberals who criticise marxism don't understand it or intentionally misrepresent it. Either way, they don't criticise it on the terms on which it is based. Fukuyama is no different. His idea of history is fundamentally different to the Marxist view of history and view of society. Marxist understanding of history is called historical materialism, and analyses events in history based on their material context, I.e. on the economic mode of production and exchange. This is a scientific view of history. Fukuyama on the other hand views history empirically I.e. he sees it as the world exists for him today. His view of the future then, is an idealist one, which evokes Hegel, who was himself an idealist, whose philosophy inspired Marx, but who Marx superseded (when he wrote The German Ideology). This is why Fukuyama is so wrong. He's an idealist, and not just that, but a bourgeois one, who bases his view of the future and of human evolution on his own class position.
Marxists are idiots, dangerous idiots. No different than nazis.
Lol
Poor predictor
2:00: political classic liberalism & economic classic liberalism produce higher levels of prosperity and happiness, 2:51: there is expansion of nondemocratic regimes nowdays (... related to left-wing ideals): 1) authoritarian regimes and 2) populism, 3:14: Fukuyama SERIOUSLY ERROR in not seeing that the USA, UK, Italy and Hungary, contrary to what he said, did not succumb to populism, but to a reaction to "identity socialism" (21st century Marxism), ALL of which classic liberal achievements continue to run smoothly, 3:51: Trump has been attacked, defamed and slandered since the first month he entered the White House, but the free press, freedom of expression remain intact ... Fukuyama is wrong in not "putting on the table" everything that the Mueller Report stands for, and is wrong not to mention the violence/destruction of the left through the streetsAND UNIVERSITIES (!!!) of the country, 5:31: Oh my God... everything is wrong .. I thought Fukuyama was going to denounce the American, South American and European left for appropriating classic liberal flags and turning them into odious divisionism through "identities"... but Fukuyama doesn't even come close to that understanding. Unfortunately, he keeps saying that Trump is a setback to democracy... Regrettable. Divisionism, polarization and lying historical revisionism are products of the academic left that has become one-dimensional throughout American and South American teaching.
He has learnt absolutely nothing.
It's fascinating in November 2021 to see how "Russian Collusion" was completely manufactured by the Clintons and the FBI which was corrupted by Obama with the assistance of much of the media. Fukuyama is engaging in the typical TDS liberalism of calling Trump a dictator who is destroying checks and balances. He ignores the actual attacks on the founding and restricting institutions while unable to articulate any actual specific Trump overreach.
digenerat
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol
lol