@@stevemyhill5785 the goal umpire didn't call a behind. He signified that the ball had crossed the line. Why do you think the field umpire has to say "all clear"? So after the goal umpire makes the "mine" call the field umpire gives the all clear for a score to be recorded. The field umpire did not give the all clear because he was making the deliberate decision. At no point was a behind signalled.
Nowadays this kind of crappy call is pretty usual, but you have to remember that back in 2012 or 2013, paying deliberate was extremely rare and this kind of call would make the lowlights, now it is considered normal for something like this to be called deliberate.
@@seekanddestroy9835 I mean you quite literally couldn't be more wrong, there's a rule now that you're allowed to concede a point by deliberately running over the line if you feel pressured within 9m of the goals..
Soccer is the greatest sport on Earth and is massive in over 240 countries. Every nation on Earth loves Soccer. Afl is big in only 4 Australian states. Soccer will be the number 1 sport in Australia by 2050 and every suburb in Australia will have its own local soccer club ohgdj
Umpire knew Malceski wanted to invite pressure there, should be a correct call but according to the rules at the time (2013) it was wrong. If that was paid today it would be the correct call now that they factor in the prior.
Technically, it was still correct at the time, it was just not as commonly called. The AFL did release a video at the start of the 2013 season detailing how this situation should be seen and adjudicated czcams.com/video/MSY6rysTIsI/video.html
2017 Laws of the game "If a player has had time or space in which to dispose of the football, they cannot rush a behind". Looks like the right call to me
He committed to distributing the ball and realised he made a mistake so takes the ball over because of pressure he invited on himself making the wrong call....
As a Hawks fan who went to the '08 grand final....thank goodness the rule didn't exist like that back then - Geelong would have had a better result than 1.9 in that second quarter if we'd been disallowed from just walking it back over the line.
It wasn't deliberate but I can understand why it was called deliberate, player made there intentions clear that they were going to rush behind and made no attempt at keeping it in play
Thats not the rule so it's a bad call. But that should be the rule. Every time the rules change, players just have to pretend they're keeping it in play a little better
@@marcuslightbody6933 Dreaming bahaha hit over the line. He stood there for a football eternity then happily backed over the line when the pressure finally came.
@@TheChemistGaming don't matter how long he was standing there mate He waited for the pressure of the forward and then ultimately the forward took the ball over with the player Well within his right to conceded within every interpretation of the rule in all of the rules history Absolutely shocking call
@@marcuslightbody6933 Youre arguing against yourself. I never said it wasnt legal, Mr big brain. Its just retarded to think this was a player being hit over the line rather than one backing over it.
deliberate OOB needs to be abolished, last to touch the ball when it goes over the line, should be a turnover, will take interpretation out of it, ease the burden on the umpires and be a fairer game.
He had the chance to kick or hand ball the ball, he hesitated twice, that is your prior opportunity gone, correct call, the players know this quite well.
@Samuel Hynes ??? That’s only if it was rushed through, it was called deliberate out of bounds because he clearly had prior opportunity to dispose of the ball and his intent was clearly not to keep the ball in play. Doesn’t matter if it’s in the goal square. His intent was to draw the player and cause a restart from the behind so they had possession, no way that would be allowed.
@Samuel Hynes I’m sorry what? So players are allowed to hold the ball, make no attempt to get rid of it, and put up no fight to keep the ball in play? I wonder then why the deliberate rule is in the game then 🤔 what a dumb comment
@@TomoGoody jesus man you can't be calling other peoples comments dumb whe you're blatantly wrong hahaha deliberate out of bounds and rushed behinds are completely seperate from each other and how you can argue anything other than a behind as the correct result for this instance shows you either haven't watched a game for 2-3 years or you're just not someone that should comment on anything footy related
@@ben10521 Looking at this from a out of bounds perspective, he had ample time to dispose of the ball and the player that eventually rushed him behind goals wasn't even following him at first and didn't tackle, something that is being called to this day (See link to example below), the only reason why it would be called pressure would be if he just happened to be within 9 meters which by the time he picked the ball up which he was not. Either way, made no attempt to keep the ball in play and had time to dispose, will be called deliberate everyday of the week if an umpire is actually paying attention. Looking at this from a rushed behind perspective, once more the forward was not pressuring him at first and was sheppard away, so there was no pressure on the defender as he came into possession, meaning he has deliberately allowed the play to stop by letting himself be pushed through. It was the right call by the umpire and clearly still holds to this day with how the rules define pressure, deliberates and failing to dispose. Just because you say I'm wrong, doesn't make it true and maybe instead of trying to critique how long I've been watching AFL, you should be using facts and knowledge of the rules to disprove my claims. (Example of fairly new calls similar to this situation: www.afl.com.au/video/464865/was-this-rushed-behind-deliberate-?videoId=464865&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1594533497001) Have a good day
@@TomoGoody alright man that one incorrect call was just an example of the only umpire to pay attention since the rules were changed lol clearly that was the incorrect call backed up by the 100's-1000's of examples of those exact same instances being deemed a fair rushed behind since then. You're looking way too deep in to how pressure is defined, watch literally 1 game of footy this year and you would see a player just has to be in the vicinity for it to be deemed pressure. And me saying you're wrong doesn't mean i'm right but given the example case you brought up is literally the only call of that nature in the last 2 years basically disproves any legitimacy it has as being the correct call, pretty sure that the 99.9% of calls that would have seen that be a rushed behind were actually the right call and it didn't happen to be that on one occasion the umpires were 'actually paying attention'
Sirengate. Fremantle St kilda. Siren sounds, freo leads by one point. They don't ring the siren... St kilda kicks a point that shouldn't count. Ref's bring the ball back and give it to St kilda for a free kick on goal, St kilda miss and draw.... Ref brings thr ball back and let's them have another crack. St kilda kicks a goal and wins. Worst refereeing I've ever seen in any sport in my life.
Deliberately takes the ball over the line, and yet according to the rules and the commentators it’s not deliberate. Umpire error, ridiculous rule. Whenever a commentator says he deliberately kicked out of bounds/took over goal line but he disguised it well enough that it shouldn’t be paid deliberate, is that not just crazy ! Direct handballs, carries over goal line should be free to opposition, no interpretation needed !
Goal Umpire was right, The goal umpire is always right
The goal umpire has to make that call regardless whether there's a free kick, it's a goal or deliberate
The goal umpire gave a behind, the field umpire gave the free for deliberate.
@@stevemyhill5785 the goal umpire didn't call a behind. He signified that the ball had crossed the line. Why do you think the field umpire has to say "all clear"? So after the goal umpire makes the "mine" call the field umpire gives the all clear for a score to be recorded. The field umpire did not give the all clear because he was making the deliberate decision. At no point was a behind signalled.
@@stevemyhill5785 The goal umpire didn’t signify any score.
@@mattjns exactly mate, called "mine" but no score was signified 👍🏻
There has been more worst umpire calls in most games
Worse*
Nowadays this kind of crappy call is pretty usual, but you have to remember that back in 2012 or 2013, paying deliberate was extremely rare and this kind of call would make the lowlights, now it is considered normal for something like this to be called deliberate.
Most Quarters, it was obvious he wanted to rush the ball across the goal line that's classed as deliberate these days.
@@seekanddestroy9835 I mean you quite literally couldn't be more wrong, there's a rule now that you're allowed to concede a point by deliberately running over the line if you feel pressured within 9m of the goals..
Soccer is the greatest sport on Earth and is massive in over 240 countries. Every nation on Earth loves Soccer. Afl is big in only 4 Australian states. Soccer will be the number 1 sport in Australia by 2050 and every suburb in Australia will have its own local soccer club ohgdj
Roaming Brian as an umpire could do better than that
@Jye Coleman cmon man ur better than liking ur own comment
Bootsma had that affect on people.... he was truly the greatest of all time :(
I miss Segy Bootsma
Umpire knew Malceski wanted to invite pressure there, should be a correct call but according to the rules at the time (2013) it was wrong. If that was paid today it would be the correct call now that they factor in the prior.
Technically, it was still correct at the time, it was just not as commonly called. The AFL did release a video at the start of the 2013 season detailing how this situation should be seen and adjudicated czcams.com/video/MSY6rysTIsI/video.html
This just came up on my recommended... the night after the SAME umpire payed a shocking deliberate against Caleb Daniel
Why is Chris Scott the thumb nail 😂
Click bait
Because he is has the best fake shocked face.
i’ve literally never clicked on a thumbnail faster
unfortunately clickbait. I was here for chris scott losing it
Insert clip of max gawn kicking it straight through the middle in the 2021 AFL grand final and it being called a point
2017 Laws of the game "If a player has had time or space in which to dispose of the football, they cannot rush a behind". Looks like the right call to me
He committed to distributing the ball and realised he made a mistake so takes the ball over because of pressure he invited on himself making the wrong call....
Key word pressure
Don't blame the umps. That's the power of Josh Bootsma.
Your profile picture makes me realise why the decision wasn't wrong, to you at least.
P.S. Just having a laugh
He had time to kick it and chose to back over the line. I hate the rushed rule but I don't see a problem with that interpretation
The thumbnail tho 😂
As a Hawks fan who went to the '08 grand final....thank goodness the rule didn't exist like that back then - Geelong would have had a better result than 1.9 in that second quarter if we'd been disallowed from just walking it back over the line.
lol the thumbnail is so funny and this was a terrable umpire decision
Nobody gonna see us together but I don’t matter
No
Cause I got u
Shut up chris
@@aidansack9727 No body wanna see us together but it don’t matter no coz I got u
accurate kicking by the blue boys lmao
lol
Ethan Trott check that man out
The thumbnail was a Geelong coach but the game was Carlton and Sydney lol
No body wanna see us together but it don’t matter no coz I got u
Shut up Ryan
@@aidansack9727 No body wanna see us together but it don’t matter no coz I got u
Nah, it was dogs vs gws in Ballarat yesterday when the gws player purposely taps the ball to his teammate and they call it a mark
It wasn't deliberate but I can understand why it was called deliberate, player made there intentions clear that they were going to rush behind and made no attempt at keeping it in play
Even though I’m a Sydney supporter I believe the worse decision is the Sydney Geelong game 2021 in round 7
Thats not the rule so it's a bad call. But that should be the rule. Every time the rules change, players just have to pretend they're keeping it in play a little better
Mate it pretty much got hit over the line by the other player
This isn't even deliberate if it was on the boundary
@@marcuslightbody6933 Dreaming bahaha hit over the line. He stood there for a football eternity then happily backed over the line when the pressure finally came.
@@TheChemistGaming don't matter how long he was standing there mate
He waited for the pressure of the forward and then ultimately the forward took the ball over with the player
Well within his right to conceded within every interpretation of the rule in all of the rules history
Absolutely shocking call
@@marcuslightbody6933 Youre arguing against yourself. I never said it wasnt legal, Mr big brain. Its just retarded to think this was a player being hit over the line rather than one backing over it.
@@marcuslightbody6933 Always amazes me when people just begin arguing with strawmen.
deliberate OOB needs to be abolished, last to touch the ball when it goes over the line, should be a turnover, will take interpretation out of it, ease the burden on the umpires and be a fairer game.
Incorrect, Maynard being held off the ball in the 2018 is easily the worst call
He had the chance to kick or hand ball the ball, he hesitated twice, that is your prior opportunity gone, correct call, the players know this quite well.
Worst decision ever was to change the rules.
yet that umpire is still running around
The thumbnail 😂
Mc Butt Clean
Worst Umpire Brawl In AFL History
not really a afl fan but a rugby one
Correct decision you can't bait someone to bring you accross the goal line.
He had a lot of time to get rid of the footy
I bet you $10 razor ray made a worst one..
How about the calls in the bulldogs game the other night
I’m just checking if I say afl is awesome they will heart this
My head hurts after seeing that lol
Love the thumbnail!
I mean he had prior, intention was clearly to draw the tackle, and made no attempt to expel the ball. Would be called every time now.
@Samuel Hynes ??? That’s only if it was rushed through, it was called deliberate out of bounds because he clearly had prior opportunity to dispose of the ball and his intent was clearly not to keep the ball in play. Doesn’t matter if it’s in the goal square. His intent was to draw the player and cause a restart from the behind so they had possession, no way that would be allowed.
@Samuel Hynes I’m sorry what? So players are allowed to hold the ball, make no attempt to get rid of it, and put up no fight to keep the ball in play? I wonder then why the deliberate rule is in the game then 🤔 what a dumb comment
@@TomoGoody jesus man you can't be calling other peoples comments dumb whe you're blatantly wrong hahaha deliberate out of bounds and rushed behinds are completely seperate from each other and how you can argue anything other than a behind as the correct result for this instance shows you either haven't watched a game for 2-3 years or you're just not someone that should comment on anything footy related
@@ben10521 Looking at this from a out of bounds perspective, he had ample time to dispose of the ball and the player that eventually rushed him behind goals wasn't even following him at first and didn't tackle, something that is being called to this day (See link to example below), the only reason why it would be called pressure would be if he just happened to be within 9 meters which by the time he picked the ball up which he was not. Either way, made no attempt to keep the ball in play and had time to dispose, will be called deliberate everyday of the week if an umpire is actually paying attention.
Looking at this from a rushed behind perspective, once more the forward was not pressuring him at first and was sheppard away, so there was no pressure on the defender as he came into possession, meaning he has deliberately allowed the play to stop by letting himself be pushed through.
It was the right call by the umpire and clearly still holds to this day with how the rules define pressure, deliberates and failing to dispose. Just because you say I'm wrong, doesn't make it true and maybe instead of trying to critique how long I've been watching AFL, you should be using facts and knowledge of the rules to disprove my claims.
(Example of fairly new calls similar to this situation: www.afl.com.au/video/464865/was-this-rushed-behind-deliberate-?videoId=464865&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1594533497001)
Have a good day
@@TomoGoody alright man that one incorrect call was just an example of the only umpire to pay attention since the rules were changed lol clearly that was the incorrect call backed up by the 100's-1000's of examples of those exact same instances being deemed a fair rushed behind since then. You're looking way too deep in to how pressure is defined, watch literally 1 game of footy this year and you would see a player just has to be in the vicinity for it to be deemed pressure. And me saying you're wrong doesn't mean i'm right but given the example case you brought up is literally the only call of that nature in the last 2 years basically disproves any legitimacy it has as being the correct call, pretty sure that the 99.9% of calls that would have seen that be a rushed behind were actually the right call and it didn't happen to be that on one occasion the umpires were 'actually paying attention'
Sirengate. Fremantle St kilda. Siren sounds, freo leads by one point. They don't ring the siren... St kilda kicks a point that shouldn't count. Ref's bring the ball back and give it to St kilda for a free kick on goal, St kilda miss and draw.... Ref brings thr ball back and let's them have another crack. St kilda kicks a goal and wins. Worst refereeing I've ever seen in any sport in my life.
True that mate
worst free ever here
Maggots be maggots.
The Swans get this sort of BS every week....
*cough* Sydney vs Geelong *cough*
@@TotalDramaOwenandNoah
That ball travelled maybe 12m.
It was the right call, mate.
@@canadianbacon3021 but they don’t even get that sort of BS
Yeah you are lucky you don't follow Essendon when it comes to bad calls
how that is a fine call
Right call
He backed up how is that a bad call?
i mean, i dont know about worst call in afl history, their has been some doozies
definitely the wrong call but malceksi did want the ball to rush through
Bad umpire
Great call!
Fair call
Choke Choke
AFL is cool mate
This guy can't coach 20 home game of çoase they make finals then choke like bunch of Geelong tiprats they are
And that's why more and more people are losing interest in Alf plus the constant rule changes
But I guess he did syop
Worst umpire sorry
wtf 😂
Deliberately takes the ball over the line, and yet according to the rules and the commentators it’s not deliberate. Umpire error, ridiculous rule. Whenever a commentator says he deliberately kicked out of bounds/took over goal line but he disguised it well enough that it shouldn’t be paid deliberate, is that not just crazy ! Direct handballs, carries over goal line should be free to opposition, no interpretation needed !
Hawks 08 made deliberate their secret weapon.
AFL click baiting
thats fair enough.guy had options
That was actually the right call
BOOOOOOOOOOO