Just installed these and they sound amazing. I was disapointed with 80% of the factory patches and these really show off what the UBXa is capable of. Well done. Get both packs!
The UBXa in your hands sounds fantastic. Behringer haters should watch this video. Not that it would help any but the truth about how great the UBxa is will at least be undeniable.
@teamcoalhapcharcoal No S**t, but there are way more people who like them for making affordable gear. It's amazing how people whine about knockoffs and yet buy Chinese knock off products all day from Amazon and Walmart yet there is no outrage. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
PS: на самом деле, я восхищён самим музыкантом. Очень немногим удаётся уговорить, заставить любой инструмент зазвучать красиво, дорого. У этого маэстро вкусно звучит четвёртый "китаец". И да: в каждом, даже самом дорогом синтезаторе 98% патчей просто беспооезный напорнитель, видимость богатого разнообразия.В Оберхайме есть пяток роскошных патчей, и маэстро их продемонстрировал. Лайк.
Some excellent patches, all of them demo'd by someone not just with technical chops but also a high degree of 'feel' for what they're playing. [Apart from that tune at 15:54 demo'ing the "Analog Piano" patch! Eeuurrgghh!!!] I really should've practised more as a kid and then my UB-Xa might sound a l'il bit more like this! This video really should silence - once and for all - the naysayers and Big B haters out there and their overly-negative comments about this instrument. Cheers, Stefano.
I'm very experienced with Oberheim equipment & that's probably the first time having heard that the UB-Xa could actually make sense, less as an OB imitator than as an instrument in its own right. Though it has almost all OB8's Page 2 parameters, it however seems that primarily the mod matrix & MPE are determining its independence. Other instr. managed the OB-gliss better, but some of the sounds presented here show the UB-Xa makes sense in its own fields.
I totally agree with you. The UBX-a is a very good synth. It looks like an OBX-a, the patch structure is exactly the same, but sincerely it does not sound exactly as an Oberheim (I had owned an OBX-a for many years). However, also thanks to its modulation matrix and its built-in keyboard offering polyphonic AT, it is a very good synth at a very convenient price, capable to do several things that the OBX-a was not able to do. About the MPE, unfortunately its current MPE implementation is not compatible for playing it from the Osmose keyboard.
@@stefanodaino THX! Good to know that it's unfortunately not compatible with the marvellous Osmose kb Have you told or conmented that on Behringer's fb page? Unfortunately the last 7 years Behringer has become that huge that getting in touch with them on other ways has become next to impossible. They definitely should focus on important updates/upgrades first & then continue their incredible clone marathon.
This is amazing!! 😃 I didn't know how beautiful a synth can sound (and so masterfully be played)! Unfortunately there's not enough room in my (living-room-) studio for the Behringer UB-XA, otherwise I'd definetly consider ordering it plus these awsome patches. Currently my only (and first) synth I own is an Arturia Minifreak. After listening to this beauty, I'm a bit afraid to turn on my Minifreak again, I might be disappointed. I was considerung to get an Oberheim TEO-5 as an alternative (which still fits into my small studio). If you would create a simlar patch-bank for the TEO-5, the decision would be easy... 😉
I was thinking the same with not having enough room for another synth keyboard, but now that Behringer has brought out the desktop version I think I could squeeze that in.
got it works great but do i have to overwrite an entire bank of factory presets just to load your sound set why cant we preview each sound and decide which ones to over write instead of having to delete an entire factory sound bank? Is there another way or more storage banks??
@@stefanodaino Great thanks! Is this Valhala reverb any responsible for stereo-rizing beautifully or stereo voice spread comes from UBXa naturally? Do you have Atrophy on to make it more vintage in your presets? First time (listening many presentations) I hear from yours what I like - when UBXa sounds not sterile.
@@samprockthe stereo panning and chorus-like fx is done only by the UBXa. Atrophy setting is the factory default. I have used the built-in UBXa modulation matrix to add dynamic movements to voices and the possibility of panning to recreate the ambisonic effect.
@@stefanodainoThat’s what I was looking for, thanks for explaining how you’ve done it! Really gives it character in making spaces and scapes, without just blending it all.
In the archive there are some sysex files and a pdf explaining how to load the files on a MIDI sequencer or a sysex librarian (there are a couple available for free for Windows and MacOS), and transfer the patches to your UBX-a after connecting it to your computer by USB or MIDI. BTW, if you need assistance, do not hesitate to write to me at support@dsp-quattro.com.
Great playing and a nice synth. But, it seems a little suited to making elevator music. It's a little ho hum to my ear, yet wonderful at the same time.
@@frankweber356 It’s not about being better or cheaper😂 It’s about what somebody wants. If you want something physical to play a VST won’t do it for you. It’s that simple lol… The biggest difference between an synth and a plugin are not the functions smh 🤦♂️ One is simply physical and the other is digital. Let people enjoy what they want and don’t be blobbing out your opinion which offers no real value.
@@scrubsjl1 ) If you want something physical, go and buy something good. 2 ) Saving money is a value to offer 3 ) I am not blobbing, i am telling openly my opinion 4 ) Accept other opinions, not only Fan-Hype- Comments. We are still living in a open minded world. Go ahead and don´t waste my time. I´ll stop here answering posts, which offer no value at all.
The "OBX" tag is indeed a bit misleading since this instrument is not a clone of the OB-X (therefore it can only halfway sound like one). Behringer is working on an OB-X clone at the moment (with discrete components) but it is still in prototype status.
Love those patches. Finally someone who creates sounds which are actually playable in a live setup
Just installed these and they sound amazing. I was disapointed with 80% of the factory patches and these really show off what the UBXa is capable of. Well done. Get both packs!
Finally, a UB-Xa demo by a real musician, and with technical chops!
This sounds amazing! And what a treat it is to watch a video of someone who can play well.💪👍
Today with them formally announcing the UB-Xa Desktop I hope loads find this video the sounds are lush
The UBXa in your hands sounds fantastic. Behringer haters should watch this video. Not that it would help any but the truth about how great the UBxa is will at least be undeniable.
@teamcoalhapcharcoal schlubbed
@teamcoalhapcharcoal No S**t, but there are way more people who like them for making affordable gear. It's amazing how people whine about knockoffs and yet buy Chinese knock off products all day from Amazon and Walmart yet there is no outrage. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Behringer frees the synth , news at 10
@teamcoalhapcharcoalVST’s are knock-offs too.
@teamcoalhapcharcoal Lots of them are. 🙂
Best demo of this synth on CZcams. You really make it sing.
Wow. Beautiful playing and the best patches for the UB-Xa I have heard so far. Well done!
Thanks for a great demo of superb patches… And superb performance!
Great playing and great sounds.
PS: на самом деле, я восхищён самим музыкантом. Очень немногим удаётся уговорить, заставить любой инструмент зазвучать красиво, дорого. У этого маэстро вкусно звучит четвёртый "китаец". И да: в каждом, даже самом дорогом синтезаторе 98% патчей просто беспооезный напорнитель, видимость богатого разнообразия.В Оберхайме есть пяток роскошных патчей, и маэстро их продемонстрировал. Лайк.
Very musical playing skills and great patches. I'd love to hear you make a soundset for the Gforce OB-X software!
Thanks for your playing and the wonderful sounds all I can say is wow😮
Ok yeah, all the people bashing this need to see this demo. Those strings at the start are awesome!
Whats that clicking Sound when a note is played …13:33 min in?????
Some excellent patches, all of them demo'd by someone not just with technical chops but also a high degree of 'feel' for what they're playing.
[Apart from that tune at 15:54 demo'ing the "Analog Piano" patch! Eeuurrgghh!!!]
I really should've practised more as a kid and then my UB-Xa might sound a l'il bit more like this!
This video really should silence - once and for all - the naysayers and Big B haters out there and their overly-negative comments about this instrument.
Cheers, Stefano.
Programming is an art, playing is another. Cool demo!
Cute that your cat appears at 11 minutes!
yes, she is Lince! 😻
Really great set of patches! Awesome playing as well!
you play very very well
Nice collection of patches and great playing! I was thinking about getting the module, but I might need to get the keyboard version for aftertouch.
Desktop module has poly touch as well
nice!
I really really enjoy that Harmonica patch
I'm very experienced with Oberheim equipment & that's probably the first time having heard that the UB-Xa could actually make sense, less as an OB imitator than as an instrument in its own right. Though it has almost all OB8's Page 2 parameters, it however seems that primarily the mod matrix & MPE are determining its independence. Other instr. managed the OB-gliss better, but some of the sounds presented here show the UB-Xa makes sense in its own fields.
I totally agree with you. The UBX-a is a very good synth. It looks like an OBX-a, the patch structure is exactly the same, but sincerely it does not sound exactly as an Oberheim (I had owned an OBX-a for many years). However, also thanks to its modulation matrix and its built-in keyboard offering polyphonic AT, it is a very good synth at a very convenient price, capable to do several things that the OBX-a was not able to do. About the MPE, unfortunately its current MPE implementation is not compatible for playing it from the Osmose keyboard.
@@stefanodaino THX! Good to know that it's unfortunately not compatible with the marvellous Osmose kb Have you told or conmented that on Behringer's fb page? Unfortunately the last 7 years Behringer has become that huge that getting in touch with them on other ways has become next to impossible. They definitely should focus on important updates/upgrades first & then continue their incredible clone marathon.
This is amazing!! 😃
I didn't know how beautiful a synth can sound (and so masterfully be played)!
Unfortunately there's not enough room in my (living-room-) studio for the Behringer UB-XA, otherwise I'd definetly consider ordering it plus these awsome patches. Currently my only (and first) synth I own is an Arturia Minifreak. After listening to this beauty, I'm a bit afraid to turn on my Minifreak again, I might be disappointed.
I was considerung to get an Oberheim TEO-5 as an alternative (which still fits into my small studio).
If you would create a simlar patch-bank for the TEO-5, the decision would be easy... 😉
I was thinking the same with not having enough room for another synth keyboard, but now that Behringer has brought out the desktop version I think I could squeeze that in.
Nice jams !!
Nice reverb
That Horn piano patch 😮
Bello sto Synt :-)
I suspect you'd make any instrument shine, but credit to the OBehrheim that you found enough in it to care.
Obehringheim
Nice
2:17 🥰🥰
Is there patch list for both banks that would help me decide which bank would work best for my taste?
got it works great but do i have to overwrite an entire bank of factory presets just to load your sound set why cant we preview each sound and decide which ones to over write instead of having to delete an entire factory sound bank? Is there another way or more storage banks??
Totale 💣
This is heckin based as heck
Very nice! Please can you perform some demos were you tweak some knobs 🤔
Sounds amazing. But I think the reverb you have put om makes it even better. What kind og reverb is it? Is it other effects in use?
I saw you mentioned the reverb longer down. Thanks. Is The Ultimate Vintage Collection the same as The Ultimate Analog Collection?
@@SigurdSalvesen Yes it is!
Хочу тебя обрадовать, дорогой: у нас от него будет ребёнок! Вариант-2 - ...у нас от него никогда не будет ребёнка!😅 Привет из России/Советского Союза
Synths tend to sound similar , yet they differ. Ask Moog.
Great playing! No FX here?
@@samprock no fx except the reverb, which is the Plate Reverb by Valhalla.
@@stefanodaino Great thanks! Is this Valhala reverb any responsible for stereo-rizing beautifully or stereo voice spread comes from UBXa naturally? Do you have Atrophy on to make it more vintage in your presets?
First time (listening many presentations) I hear from yours what I like - when UBXa sounds not sterile.
@@samprockthe stereo panning and chorus-like fx is done only by the UBXa. Atrophy setting is the factory default. I have used the built-in UBXa modulation matrix to add dynamic movements to voices and the possibility of panning to recreate the ambisonic effect.
@@stefanodainoThat’s what I was looking for, thanks for explaining how you’ve done it! Really gives it character in making spaces and scapes, without just blending it all.
yea but how do you load the files on to the ub xa
In the archive there are some sysex files and a pdf explaining how to load the files on a MIDI sequencer or a sysex librarian (there are a couple available for free for Windows and MacOS), and transfer the patches to your UBX-a after connecting it to your computer by USB or MIDI. BTW, if you need assistance, do not hesitate to write to me at support@dsp-quattro.com.
@@stefanodaino what archive
can you just give me a link to the archive
@@stefanodaino ive been at this for hours it should not be this hard i just need a little instruction i have midi ox
che effetto hai usato per il riverbero?
E’ il Plate Reverb di Valhalla
A lot of spatial effects
Great playing and a nice synth. But, it seems a little suited to making elevator music. It's a little ho hum to my ear, yet wonderful at the same time.
Der Synthi klingt nicht besonders gut😢
Low output as all Behringer products. Any Plugin will do as well.
Then buy a plugin…😂
@@scrubsjl Of course, it´s better and cheaper !!🤓
@@frankweber356 It’s not about being better or cheaper😂 It’s about what somebody wants. If you want something physical to play a VST won’t do it for you. It’s that simple lol…
The biggest difference between an synth and a plugin are not the functions smh 🤦♂️ One is simply physical and the other is digital.
Let people enjoy what they want and don’t be blobbing out your opinion which offers no real value.
@@scrubsjl1 ) If you want something physical, go and buy something good. 2 ) Saving money is a value to offer 3 ) I am not blobbing, i am telling openly my opinion 4 ) Accept other opinions, not only Fan-Hype- Comments. We are still living in a open minded world. Go ahead and don´t waste my time. I´ll stop here answering posts, which offer no value at all.
a lot of them sound the same
Sound of the Ubxa is mehh, good patches
It's an analog beast, sounds incredible, yet you made that troll of a comment. Dude...
-1 all these patches sound alike, and none like an #obx, delete them tags
The "OBX" tag is indeed a bit misleading since this instrument is not a clone of the OB-X (therefore it can only halfway sound like one). Behringer is working on an OB-X clone at the moment (with discrete components) but it is still in prototype status.
Your ears gotta be fked if all those patches sound similar to you💀
I recommend seeing a doctor or not commenting on music😂
grazie per questo demo, thanks for sharing, i subscribe to your channel