Elvis is the GOAT. Even the Beatles said that, as well as a zillion others - Springsteen, Chuck Berry etc. The Beatles are great, but no one comes close to The King.
MarkRogersTV College Football I like Elvis too. And he was the King from about the middle of 1955 until he went into the army in early 1958. After that, mainly thanks to his crooked manager Tom Parker Elvis his career was totally mismanaged. Perhaps the most mismanaged career of any superstar in the history of show business. From the time Elvis got out of the Army in 1960 until his Christmas special of 1968, Elvis did not any live performances whatsoever. Zero. All he did were Elvis movies which were all the same and not very good. And they would release the occasional single to keep his name relevant on the charts. After his comeback TV special, Elvis Did nothing but live performances in Vegas and arenas throughout the USA. He got burned out, fat and at the end of his life became a caricature of his once great self. It is true that all the Beatles admired Elvis, but they admired his pre-army career which gave them a lot of inspiration, but not his post army careers. And the Beatles played live concerts all over the world. Elvis Presley never played a live concert outside of North America. That was because of his manager Tom Parker who was afraid to leave the US because he would get in trouble with European authorities for things he had done in his past. Also, Elvis was never the same after his mother died in 1959. So yes Elvis was great and truly the King, but the Beatles ruled and still rule today. Elvis Presley the most versatile voice in history and could sing any kind of music you could imagine. If Elvis had had proper management throughout his entire career, He would’ve shared the ruling status with John Paul George and Ringo. Also note that after Brian Epstein died the Beatles did not have good management either. But they could still write and play their own music. They would’ve broken up eventually anyway but not nearly as soon and not nearly as nasty. This is why when you look at the big picture the Beatles were at least a little better than Elvis.
@@shackdaddy7106 Hey Larry, I appreciate the thoughtful and detailed response. I agree with most of your take. I'm aware of the history. I understand that a debate could be waged (and is all over the internet) on popularity and influence. I refrain from such discussions. I simply speak based on what I hear. The Beatles are one of my 5-10 favorites and probably have the second most number of songs that I enjoy listening to. I consider them the greatest band of all-time. Elvis' place in my musical universe is untouched though. To me he is simply the greatest vocalist and stage performer and no one rivals him. As you mention, he was mismanaged and also destroyed himself. Those facts actually magnify his enormous talent. Imagine, someone forged arguably the greatest career in the history of entertainment and because of the Army, Col Parker and drug abuse, only truly was doing what he should have been for about five years of a 23 year career. Amazing. Again, thanks for the response.
Koozie modo I always knew Paul was a terrific singer but never knew just HOW good til I moved to Japan, and got into Karaoke, at a place on the hill, near me. The range that lad had was unbelievable. I can sing most John, George and Ringo-led songs quite passably - Paul's are another proposition entirely. I can Just about do 'Hey Jude' but the rest... I can't get anywhere near. My Billy Joel's, Rod Stewart's, even Tom Jones' sounds ok in karaoke. But I've learned to give Paul's songs a miss now, to avoid sounding like a fool (on the hill).
At first I thought I had it figured out: John would let Paul take all the high runs. Makes sense. Then John sang "soooo long" near the end. and I just marveled at the vocal tapestry. I don't know how barbershop quartets arrange their harmonies, much less The Beatles. I blame a lifetime spent listening to these guys for making me try to harmonize alongside every melody I hear.
Paul and Johns' voices go together like nothing else. Edit: some people in the replies say this is George singing back up. Upon closer listening, I can't tell if it's George or John, but sounds like John to me. I'm sure everyone would still agree with my statement though.
I just absolutely love the way they trade off the lead vocal like that so interchangeably. Unless you listen really closely thanks to isolated audio tracks like these, it's hard to notice how nicely blended in it sounds with the rest of their rock band instruments. No other songwriting duo was this awesome and talented quite like Lennon and McCartney,
MarkRogersTV College Football actually no, Paul and John both had better voices then Elvis. So did Freddie, Stevie Wonder, Ray Charles, Michael Jackson, Robert Plant, Aretha Franklin, and many others had better voices than Elvis
Caleb Perez I love John and Paul but seriously you are kidding yourself if you think they have better voices than Elvis!! As for MJ don’t even start me on his weak vocals and girlish squeals!!
MegaKrisso you’re kidding right? Elvis’s voice is great, but his voice is not nearly as interesting or rangeful as Paul or John. Elvis has to be the most overatted singer ever. He is one of the greatest entertainers ever, but not a godly singer. He ain’t no Stevie, Freddie, Marvin Gaye, or countless other singers. You may not like MJ, but he is one of the greatest singers of all time, even when he’s not “squealing” as you put it
@@calebperez7204 you have to put the time Elvis came along into perspective. He came out of nowhere and onto a music scene that was just beginning to develop from dance hall/wartime music to a new genre of Rock and Roll. Without Elvis many others wouldn’t have followed including The Beatles.
@@martincvitkovich724 Yes, there are softwares nowadays to correct the pitch of the voice to the point that It sounds robotic (especially in mainstream pop or trap)
Without a doubt Their 3 part harmony climb (straight B chord) on the bridge knocks me out every freakin' time 1:33 - 1:43. Even top tribute bands don't always get that part right.
*Stages of being a Beatles fan* 1st stage: Affection. Thinks their music is quite good, listens to a few. 2nd stage: Starts listening to more songs, beginning to get into them more. 3rd stage: Loves them, starts listening to every songs of theirs. 4th stage: Beatlemaniac. Listens to every songs, watches all of their interviews or anything related to them. Craziest stage of being a fan. 5th stage: Realization. Knows that they won’t ever get to meet Lennon and Harrison or go to a Beatles concert. Becomes sad for being too obsessed.
I'm almost at stage 5, I don't think I'm properly depressed yet, either that or I've gone to the 6th stage which is to forget the fact that you won't meet them and just underatand that I am now a massive Beatles fan
@LudVan 75 why is it going too far? Are you able to substantiate this claim? Many have made this argument but do not list significant reasons why Delius, Elgar Beethoven's works, are superior to the works of Lennon and McCartney. Most people would be able to recall many Lennon and McCartney tunes, but apart from a couple of melodies by Elgar and fewer by Delius, therenot widly known or appreciated outside the classical circles. Lennon and McCartney in my opinion were exceptional composers and produced many complex vocal arrangements and all without a formal foundation in music theory and harmony. Please don't discount their musical achievements just because they worked in a modern condensed pop/ rock sphere. They were as inovative and experimental as any os 5he past masters. And they took a large portion of humanity along on thier journey. If you care to intellegently discuss the musical merits of their compositions, both sides I'm certainly up for it. Regards to you.
This ‘65 into ‘66 period was unbeatable. So fracking tight. When John breaks into that falsetto on “so long to find out” - just such a John moment. But what’s so great is Paul is right there.
phenomenal is a strong word. basic is more fitting. this was very simple drumming, a child learning to drum could do this after like 3 solid lessons. ringo is a fine drummer in his own right, but calling this phenomenal is like calling mcdonalds a fine dining establishment with gourmet food
@@El6Magico6Arlequin6 It's the right word - 5th greatest drummer of all time according to Rolling Stone. You make the same mistake most people make about Ringo: that all he did was keep time. Have a listen again to those 27 #1 hits and see how Ringo shaped every one of them.
@@Tonetwisters You can judge a lot about someones knowledge, by their opinion of Ringo. People who know nothing about drumming don't rate him, musicians think he's really good and great drummers hero worship him!
@@TheMamspoker You did say phenomenal on this track, wiley man said it wasn't (imo correctly). To then mention about Ringos ability throughout their career is irrelevant. He was a great drummer and highly regarded but Day Tripper is pretty basic with a few clever fills. Phenomenal is a gross overstatement.
Chris Mooney No it isn’t. Paul takes the lead in the verses, with John providing backing vocals. John takes the lead in the chorus, with Paul and George providing backing vocals.
1:33 is the kind of transcendental moment that makes the Beatles seem almost supernatural. I wonder if Paul ever watches these new track separation videos. Does he also think: how, how?!
It's unbelievable that four guys from Liverpool (or anywhere, really), each so talented ( songwriting, musicianship, et al) would meet and create this wonderful music. The odds of that happening anywhere, anytime in this universe or beyond are - in my conservative estimation - about 10 billion to 1. Make that 20 or 30 .... It was a once-in-a-lifetime experience if you, as I, was a 12 year old watching The Beatles Feb. 9, 1964 (I think) live on Ed Sullivan. I was so lucky (my parents weren't: they had to get me a guitar right away - I pestered them; thanks Mom and Dad).
@@davids.7238 You might consider looking up the difference between 'relative, and relevant'. And please understand that relative is used as an adjective here...not a noun. Good luck on your English lesson. (Something you should have learned back in the 4th grade). You Americans always crack me up with your, how should I say it...'understanding/grasp of your own language'. Lol.
@@baberoot1998 What a pompous reply! You confused us Americans with your sentence fragment. We’re much too dumb to read between the lines (dots). Lol. I think you’re just too proud to admit that you goofed. Interesting cover though. (I’m using “cover” as a noun.)
I like the way they switch off. Paul is lead singer in the verse and John is harmony in the second /fourth line. Then John is lead in the chorus and Paul sings the high harmony.
It was a warm summer day in the 60's..they were young and couldn't even "imagine" what it's like to be 64 years old. The sun seemed brighter then. They would say "Here comes the sun". Life was perfect..but all things must pass.
I like these kind of snippets into Beatle recordings. With the lack of recording technology in those days I think it's quite amazing what they achieved. It's 50 years since they split and they still sell there music. I wish I could be here in the next 50 yrs I bet they will still be popular.
Goddam their three-part harmony is unsurpassed! Just John and Paul together is magical. Their voices were naturally harmonious even if they were singing the same thing the same way. There will never be another band with that kind of prolific and consistent creative output. There are very VERY few Beatle songs that I think are just ok. And can we talk about Revolver? Why is it whenever the topic of “best album ever” comes up it’s “Pet Sounds” for The Beach Boys and “Sgt Pepper” for The Beatles? Don’t get me wrong, Pepper is great but Revolver is GROUNDBREAKING! Nothing, NOTHING had ever been heard like that before. It truly is their best, most influential album in my opinion. And with the exception of The White Album is the only LP to feature not only three Harrison tracks, but start off on a Harrison track. Which is arguably one of the best tracks to ever kick off an album. Anyway... yea Revolver!
They were in the right place, at the right time. There was something new and different in their music and lyrics, and people loved it. If they'd been a few years earlier or later, we might have never heard of the Beatles, playing Liverpool gigs.
Most Beatles fans do not know that Paul sings under John on the following lines: "For taking the easy way out (now)", "She took me half the way there (now)" and "She only played one-night stands (now)" If anyone doubts me, search The Beatles at Candlestick Park (their last concert). John's mic is very very low on Day Tripper and Paul's is very loud and you can hear Paul singing "Got a good reason, then he sings the low "For taking the easy way out" MIND BLOWN!😊
79goldmaster1 its because music isn’t about good music anymore, its about what you look like and if you can dance and sing at the same time. You can thank MTV for ruining it by making looks more important than music..
Because music along with all other forms of entertainment has been deliberately dumbed down in order to make it easier to sell to women, who by nature are shallow and do not require depth.
Greatness. Listen how tight the vocals are and how they interweave, with harmonies going above and below the lead, so that you can't really tell which one is which. Just brilliant.
Their harmonics, I was 18 when first heard “I Want To Hold Your Hand” One thing brought up my attention was the sound of their harmonics, their high pitch chorus voices, that was completely different of everything I’ve heard before. So, first their music, theirs voices then of course the lyrics of their songs. A whole revolution.
Day Tripper was recorded on October 16, 1965 at Abbey Road's EMI Studios, the same day as If I Needed Someone, George Harrison's title on Rubber Soul. The band repeats the title in the afternoon and records three different instrumental takes, finally choosing the last one to add the vocal parts. John Lennon and Paul McCartney share the singing and the chorus, but it is Paul who holds the vocal lead on the verses: unusual for the Beatles, where it is generally to the main composer of the title that returns this role
they influenced the entire r&r scene but in late 70's when disco was shoved up us, they had nothing to do with that, or punk and definable not rap. Beatles influence groups like Beach Boys that influenced Beatles . All of the music of that era fed off each other, but it would have been lame if not for Beatles!
They were cool in their early years. Raw, loud, aggressive, and pure rock was the music they played in their cavern club and hamburg era. Probably the first band to have the pure straightforward unpolished underground essence of rock n roll.
"I - tried to please her." I've heard, and played this song a thousand times, and I never knew he said I - tried to please her, I only ever heard "Tried to please her."
I love these... I never noticed before; there's a minor slip up by Paul, I believe; around 2:07. It sounds like he starts to sing the lyrics from an earlier chorus, but then catches himself and corrects it. Sound like "A one-day driver, yeah". Sort of a mash up of "one-way ticket" and "Sunday driver". Anyone else hearing that?
Actually, these little “goofs” were very common during their early recording years. John was notorious for forgetting even his own lyrics but being the pros they were, they kept on playing/recording. Of course, studio time wasn’t cheap so if the goof wasn’t that huge, it made history!
When time put these 4 gentleman together it created a virtuous circle! These guys made each other better, while in some other bands it works the other way ‘round.
I had to sing lead on this at a summer rock camp when i was eighteen. I mustve listened to it fifty times in a row the day before the performance, i was so nervous about getting it right. I'd like to think i pulled it off but it's hard to recall now, honestly. I remember rehearsals a lot better than the actual performance.
The without the 🎶 music makes the Beatles voice sounds great because you can actually hear how the Beatles combine their voices together and sing that's makes the it more amazing
What a phenomenal vocal. God gave us a true gift when he got these Fab 4 together. They were truly a gift from heaven. I know they made my world a happier place.
As I've posted before, I've run out of accolades, hyperbole, praise for Johnny and the Moondogs. And, because I'm a 68-year-old Beatlemaniac and know whereof I speak, I say the world will never see their like again; that's for darned sure.
@@79goldmaster1 You know it. The world is a better place because of Beatles' music. I used to work as a staffer in Illinois Senate politics, and during sessions full of acrimony, vitriol, etc., I dreamed of the idea of breaking into the PA system and playing "All You Need is Love" loud. I ain't no hippie or flower child - I wouldn't have attended Woodstock for all the tea at Lipton's - but Beatles' music has such a soothing effect. The best ther ever was, the best there ever will be: JPGR!
It’s as simple as this: The Beatles were the greatest musical aggregation ever to walk the planet. Period.
Agreed. I've said the same thing to many videos using different words. Their depth of talent was staggering.
Indeed
Elvis is the GOAT. Even the Beatles said that, as well as a zillion others - Springsteen, Chuck Berry etc. The Beatles are great, but no one comes close to The King.
MarkRogersTV College Football I like Elvis too. And he was the King from about the middle of 1955 until he went into the army in early 1958.
After that, mainly thanks to his crooked manager Tom Parker Elvis his career was totally mismanaged. Perhaps the most mismanaged career of any superstar in the history of show business.
From the time Elvis got out of the Army in 1960 until his Christmas special of 1968, Elvis did not any live performances whatsoever. Zero. All he did were Elvis movies which were all the same and not very good. And they would release the occasional single to keep his name relevant on the charts.
After his comeback TV special, Elvis Did nothing but live performances in Vegas and arenas throughout the USA.
He got burned out, fat and at the end of his life became a caricature of his once great self.
It is true that all the Beatles admired Elvis, but they admired his pre-army career which gave them a lot of inspiration, but not his post army careers.
And the Beatles played live concerts all over the world. Elvis Presley never played a live concert outside of North America. That was because of his manager Tom Parker who was afraid to leave the US because he would get in trouble with European authorities for things he had done in his past.
Also, Elvis was never the same after his mother died in 1959.
So yes Elvis was great and truly the King, but the Beatles ruled and still rule today.
Elvis Presley the most versatile voice in history and could sing any kind of music you could imagine.
If Elvis had had proper management throughout his entire career, He would’ve shared the ruling status with John Paul George and Ringo.
Also note that after Brian Epstein died the Beatles did not have good management either. But they could still write and play their own music. They would’ve broken up eventually anyway but not nearly as soon and not nearly as nasty.
This is why when you look at the big picture the Beatles were at least a little better than Elvis.
@@shackdaddy7106 Hey Larry, I appreciate the thoughtful and detailed response. I agree with most of your take. I'm aware of the history. I understand that a debate could be waged (and is all over the internet) on popularity and influence. I refrain from such discussions. I simply speak based on what I hear. The Beatles are one of my 5-10 favorites and probably have the second most number of songs that I enjoy listening to. I consider them the greatest band of all-time. Elvis' place in my musical universe is untouched though. To me he is simply the greatest vocalist and stage performer and no one rivals him. As you mention, he was mismanaged and also destroyed himself. Those facts actually magnify his enormous talent. Imagine, someone forged arguably the greatest career in the history of entertainment and because of the Army, Col Parker and drug abuse, only truly was doing what he should have been for about five years of a 23 year career. Amazing. Again, thanks for the response.
The extreme flexibility of Paul McCartney's voice is breathtaking
Starts out singing lead (John on lower harmony) ... then switches over to high harmony on John's lead part.
I concur
Koozie modo I always knew Paul was a terrific singer but never knew just HOW good til I moved to Japan, and got into Karaoke, at a place on the hill, near me. The range that lad had was unbelievable. I can sing most John, George and Ringo-led songs quite passably - Paul's are another proposition entirely. I can Just about do 'Hey Jude' but the rest... I can't get anywhere near. My Billy Joel's, Rod Stewart's, even Tom Jones' sounds ok in karaoke. But I've learned to give Paul's songs a miss now, to avoid sounding like a fool (on the hill).
absolutely! He's a marvel - astonishing range and such a gorgeous timbre.
@@Tonetwisters In fact first Paul is singing lead and on the second line it's John, with Paul singing the lower harmony part... Listen carefully!
I love that at 2:09 you can hear either Paul or John start to sing “a one way” instead of “Sunday”
I think it’s Paul
I was just about to say yeah
Dang I've listened to that song 100 times that I never noticed that
John and Paul switching lead parts ...
Yep. Paul leads on the verses. John leads on the choruses.
At first I thought I had it figured out: John would let Paul take all the high runs. Makes sense. Then John sang "soooo long" near the end. and I just marveled at the vocal tapestry. I don't know how barbershop quartets arrange their harmonies, much less The Beatles.
I blame a lifetime spent listening to these guys for making me try to harmonize alongside every melody I hear.
Tonetwisters yeah I just realised how much John fad to sing on this one. Awesome
Yeah - coz Paul had a better falsetto / high register for the upper harmonies.
That's the genius of it the switching the parts up
I feel so fortunate to have been a teenager...15, when they came onto the musical scene in '64. Yeah, I'm 70 now and still love the Beatles.
Phil Brown Me, too. I was 14. I’ll never forget the first time they appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show.
I was 12 when they appeared on Ed Sullivan. I feel blessed to have taken the whole ride with them. So grateful Paul is still performing.
Greetings from Poland, Phil!!
The Beatles came to America on the heels of the JFK assassination. To this child of the 60s they were like mana from above.
@@jacquelinewhiteley9437 So is Ringo. He tours all over every year and puts out regular CD's. He has a brand new one called 'Whats My Name'.
The closer you investigate the Beatles, the greater they look.
Cool haircuts too.
good point
That is the undisputed truth.
EXACTLY!!
cept for john . . . shit father to julian , i dont give a fuck for talent . . . bad dad is a bad person ,
The perfect Ahhhhhs
Didn't expect to see you here leo
Paul and Johns' voices go together like nothing else.
Edit: some people in the replies say this is George singing back up. Upon closer listening, I can't tell if it's George or John, but sounds like John to me. I'm sure everyone would still agree with my statement though.
Then throw in George on the 3-part harmony and its magical.
Some of the best Beatles harmonies are on words of love and tell me what you see
TurkeysGames and your bird can sing is one of my favorite for harmonies.
@@man2842 thats another great one
So true. It's such a pity they did so much double-tracking on the white album. It would have been so much better with the two of them harmonizing
Just the 10 seconds of harmony from 1:32 to 1:42, even if the song around it did not exist, is enough to give you chills.
That little bit of sandpaper on John’s vocal is just THE BEST!
And it goes without saying, but Paul’s quality is typically magnificent.
mind blowing. Man oh man where they ever gifted. Never repeated since
Great song writers and creators of music. Genius. Elvis is the most brilliant vocalist and stage performer. He can't be matched.
Laughs in Kendrick Lamar
@@swansonjoe7121 hahah what on earth do you mean
There is a magic between the two of them.. Unbelievable voices..
I just absolutely love the way they trade off the lead vocal like that so interchangeably. Unless you listen really closely thanks to isolated audio tracks like these, it's hard to notice how nicely blended in it sounds with the rest of their rock band instruments. No other songwriting duo was this awesome and talented quite like Lennon and McCartney,
two of the greatest rock singers of all time in one band
And #3 was pretty damn great as well. Even the drummer could sing a little.
William Campbell has a great voice as well
The ascending ahhhs (3 part harmony on the B major chord) always knocks me out - even their breathing is aligned!!
Interesting comment!
Good call!
There’s the Beatles then there’s everybody else
As a band, probably yes. As a vocalist and performer, Elvis stands alone. He is unmatched.
MarkRogersTV College Football actually no, Paul and John both had better voices then Elvis. So did Freddie, Stevie Wonder, Ray Charles, Michael Jackson, Robert Plant, Aretha Franklin, and many others had better voices than Elvis
Caleb Perez I love John and Paul but seriously you are kidding yourself if you think they have better voices than Elvis!!
As for MJ don’t even start me on his weak vocals and girlish squeals!!
MegaKrisso you’re kidding right? Elvis’s voice is great, but his voice is not nearly as interesting or rangeful as Paul or John. Elvis has to be the most overatted singer ever. He is one of the greatest entertainers ever, but not a godly singer. He ain’t no Stevie, Freddie, Marvin Gaye, or countless other singers. You may not like MJ, but he is one of the greatest singers of all time, even when he’s not “squealing” as you put it
@@calebperez7204 you have to put the time Elvis came along into perspective. He came out of nowhere and onto a music scene that was just beginning to develop from dance hall/wartime music to a new genre of Rock and Roll. Without Elvis many others wouldn’t have followed including The Beatles.
unfortunatly i have no control of the future of music , but the past had complete control of me, thanks john, paul , george and ringo.
tight. no autotune. those were the days.
like it should be, sincere
what's auto tune?
@@martincvitkovich724 It is when you adjust the pitch of a note to make it perfectly in tune
@@levihockey2652 and that can be accomplished with voice pitch? automatically?
@@martincvitkovich724 Yes, there are softwares nowadays to correct the pitch of the voice to the point that It sounds robotic (especially in mainstream pop or trap)
So good it scary. They were in their 20's its almost like paul and john where destined
*Isolated vocals sound so good you can appreciate their voices, and wer'nt they just great, best harmonising!*
Without a doubt
Their 3 part harmony climb (straight B chord) on the bridge knocks me out every freakin' time 1:33 - 1:43. Even top tribute bands don't always get that part right.
*Stages of being a Beatles fan*
1st stage: Affection. Thinks their music is quite good, listens to a few.
2nd stage: Starts listening to more songs, beginning to get into them more.
3rd stage: Loves them, starts listening to every songs of theirs.
4th stage: Beatlemaniac. Listens to every songs, watches all of their interviews or anything related to them. Craziest stage of being a fan.
5th stage: Realization. Knows that they won’t ever get to meet Lennon and Harrison or go to a Beatles concert. Becomes sad for being too obsessed.
I'm almost at stage 5, I don't think I'm properly depressed yet, either that or I've gone to the 6th stage which is to forget the fact that you won't meet them and just underatand that I am now a massive Beatles fan
the greatest band ever, not up for discussion, it's a fact
Not the best but because they were the first of the "invasion".
@@patcola7335 sorry THE BEST EVER
Our great grandkids will marvel with envy that we lived in the world at the same time as the most talented musicians in human history
@LudVan 75 oh! come on, he is talking about pop music of course, dont be boring.
the problem is that they never heard of them
@LudVan 75 why is it going too far? Are you able to substantiate this claim? Many have made this argument but do not list significant reasons why Delius, Elgar Beethoven's works, are superior to the works of Lennon and McCartney. Most people would be able to recall many Lennon and McCartney tunes, but apart from a couple of melodies by Elgar and fewer by Delius, therenot widly known or appreciated outside the classical circles. Lennon and McCartney in my opinion were exceptional composers and produced many complex vocal arrangements and all without a formal foundation in music theory and harmony. Please don't discount their musical achievements just because they worked in a modern condensed pop/ rock sphere. They were as inovative and experimental as any os 5he past masters. And they took a large portion of humanity along on thier journey. If you care to intellegently discuss the musical merits of their compositions, both sides I'm certainly up for it. Regards to you.
So agreed agreed agreed agreed agreed ....the most talented musicians!!
This ‘65 into ‘66 period was unbeatable. So fracking tight. When John breaks into that falsetto on “so long to find out” - just such a John moment. But what’s so great is Paul is right there.
Ringo's drumming on this: phenomenal.
Yessir. And he "can't play" according to all the "experts."
phenomenal is a strong word. basic is more fitting. this was very simple drumming, a child learning to drum could do this after like 3 solid lessons. ringo is a fine drummer in his own right, but calling this phenomenal is like calling mcdonalds a fine dining establishment with gourmet food
@@El6Magico6Arlequin6 It's the right word - 5th greatest drummer of all time according to Rolling Stone. You make the same mistake most people make about Ringo: that all he did was keep time. Have a listen again to those 27 #1 hits and see how Ringo shaped every one of them.
@@Tonetwisters You can judge a lot about someones knowledge, by their opinion of Ringo. People who know nothing about drumming don't rate him, musicians think he's really good and great drummers hero worship him!
@@TheMamspoker You did say phenomenal on this track, wiley man said it wasn't (imo correctly). To then mention about Ringos ability throughout their career is irrelevant. He was a great drummer and highly regarded but Day Tripper is pretty basic with a few clever fills. Phenomenal is a gross overstatement.
2:07 Paul goes to sing “One Way Ticket” instead of “Sunday Driver”
One way driver yeah
I cant un hear this
Im pretty sure its George doing the high falsetto. Paul was doing the middle part.
U must have great ears I've slowed it down and still can't hear it..lol
Sounds more like "One Day Driver" to me.
Great doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface.
Just brilliant how Paul and John overlaid their vocals. Co-leads.
Vinyl Fetish Club They were probably conserving tracks. I’m guessing this was either 8 or 16 track at most.
@@comiskey2005 It's John Lennon double tracked, with a bit of Paul.
Chris Mooney No it isn’t. Paul takes the lead in the verses, with John providing backing vocals. John takes the lead in the chorus, with Paul and George providing backing vocals.
Just genius. Lennon McCartney song writing. Never have this again.......
McCartney just scared the shit out of my cat.
Hugo Chavez lol I couldn't hear anything so i turned up my volume, and when the first lyric came. I nearly had a heart attack
this is absolutely insane how great that is and Paul harmonizing is brilliant
God bless you Beatle People!
I'm so BLESSED to have grown up listening to these guys!
It's like taking an x-ray of the Sistine Chapel ceiling...and finding a hand-written note from God.
Michelangelo
she was a day tripper and her name was Lucy.
Didn't that moron use stone tablets ?
Or the tooth fairy!
What a wonderful description
1:33 is the kind of transcendental moment that makes the Beatles seem almost supernatural. I wonder if Paul ever watches these new track separation videos. Does he also think: how, how?!
Love the incredible power of Jl's voice on "SO-OH LONG" ETC.
Oh wow. They all had such great voices.
Voices that didn't really blend, but were killer, all blended together ...
This sounds so good.
It's unbelievable that four guys from Liverpool (or anywhere, really), each so talented ( songwriting, musicianship, et al) would meet and create this wonderful music. The odds of that happening anywhere, anytime in this universe or beyond are - in my conservative estimation - about 10 billion to 1. Make that 20 or 30 .... It was a once-in-a-lifetime experience if you, as I, was a 12 year old watching The Beatles Feb. 9, 1964 (I think) live on Ed Sullivan. I was so lucky (my parents weren't: they had to get me a guitar right away - I pestered them; thanks Mom and Dad).
Yikes. Tom I like the Beatles too that's why I'm here listening to the this but don't you think you're being a tad too overpraising?
tavistock helped, juzz sayin. still great voices
Greatest band...that ever lived. The Beatles will be relative...500 years from now.
relevant?
@@davids.7238 You might consider looking up the difference between 'relative, and relevant'. And please understand that relative is used as an adjective here...not a noun. Good luck on your English lesson. (Something you should have learned back in the 4th grade). You Americans always crack me up with your, how should I say it...'understanding/grasp of your own language'. Lol.
@@baberoot1998 What a pompous reply! You confused us Americans with your sentence fragment. We’re much too dumb to read between the lines (dots). Lol. I think you’re just too proud to admit that you goofed. Interesting cover though. (I’m using “cover” as a noun.)
@@cantgetnobooty Can't get no booty? I can believe it.
@@baberoot1998 Lol!
You can hear Ringo beating the hell out of the drums in the background.
No ya cant
@@chrishill6276 Not my fault you are deaf.
@@chrishill6276 I can.
1:29 they’re getting ready to go up the vocal rollercoaster 😍
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, they were that good. And always better than you thought they were
The " so long" is pure magic
I like the way they switch off. Paul is lead singer in the verse and John is harmony in the second /fourth line. Then John is lead in the chorus and Paul sings the high harmony.
It was a warm summer day in the 60's..they were young and couldn't even "imagine" what it's like to be 64 years old. The sun seemed brighter then. They would say "Here comes the sun". Life was perfect..but all things must pass.
I like these kind of snippets into Beatle recordings. With the lack of recording technology in those days I think it's quite amazing what they achieved. It's 50 years since they split and they still sell there music. I wish I could be here in the next 50 yrs I bet they will still be popular.
Goddam their three-part harmony is unsurpassed! Just John and Paul together is magical. Their voices were naturally harmonious even if they were singing the same thing the same way. There will never be another band with that kind of prolific and consistent creative output. There are very VERY few Beatle songs that I think are just ok.
And can we talk about Revolver? Why is it whenever the topic of “best album ever” comes up it’s “Pet Sounds” for The Beach Boys and “Sgt Pepper” for The Beatles? Don’t get me wrong, Pepper is great but Revolver is GROUNDBREAKING! Nothing, NOTHING had ever been heard like that before. It truly is their best, most influential album in my opinion. And with the exception of The White Album is the only LP to feature not only three Harrison tracks, but start off on a Harrison track. Which is arguably one of the best tracks to ever kick off an album. Anyway... yea Revolver!
McCartney is a master
Inconfundible JOHN!!
Lord above_ How good is this? Goosebumps time hearing those vocals. Brilliant.
They were in the right place, at the right time.
There was something new and different in their music and lyrics, and people loved it.
If they'd been a few years earlier or later, we might have never heard of the Beatles, playing Liverpool gigs.
Just stunning to hear without the instruments "cluttering up" the sound. Their voices so pure, and the harmonies locked in.
Cool to hear stuff like this, gives the audience more insight to the band.
Most Beatles fans do not know that Paul sings under John on the following lines:
"For taking the easy way out (now)", "She took me half the way there (now)" and "She only played one-night stands (now)" If anyone doubts me, search The Beatles at Candlestick Park (their last concert). John's mic is very very low on Day Tripper and Paul's is very loud and you can hear Paul singing "Got a good reason, then he sings the low "For taking the easy way out" MIND BLOWN!😊
Two Great lead singers in one band. Amazing.
Great John. Plus Paul and George. What vocals. Yes they do all the instruments first and then with headphones they complete the vocals.
One of the best. Why can't we get anything similar to this now ??
79goldmaster1 I’d like some of the early stuff will sound raw as
One reason, a band cannot get steady work anymore. It's all one nighters. The Beatles honed their skills playing live night after night in Hamburg.
79goldmaster1 its because music isn’t about good music anymore, its about what you look like and if you can dance and sing at the same time. You can thank MTV for ruining it by making looks more important than music..
Because music along with all other forms of entertainment has been deliberately dumbed down in order to make it easier to sell to women, who by nature are shallow and do not require depth.
It is because the music industry is promoting electronica music which is cheaper to make and means more money for them.
Greatness. Listen how tight the vocals are and how they interweave, with harmonies going above and below the lead, so that you can't really tell which one is which. Just brilliant.
Only one word can DESCRIBE them FABULOUS!!!!
目まぐるしく変わるリードヴォーカルと低音とファルセットで厚みを出すジョージ。
たった3人の声なのに芸術的過ぎる。
ビートルズを超えるバンドはやっぱり永遠に現れないんだろうな。
Their harmonics, I was 18 when first heard “I Want To Hold Your Hand” One thing brought up my attention was the sound of their harmonics, their high pitch chorus voices, that was completely different of everything I’ve heard before. So, first their music, theirs voices then of course the lyrics of their songs. A whole revolution.
Such dedication to and love for their songs and their band! 😊
These isolations are "it" for me now.
Thank you!
Day Tripper was recorded on October 16, 1965 at Abbey Road's EMI Studios, the same day as If I Needed Someone, George Harrison's title on Rubber Soul. The band repeats the title in the afternoon and records three different instrumental takes, finally choosing the last one to add the vocal parts. John Lennon and Paul McCartney share the singing and the chorus, but it is Paul who holds the vocal lead on the verses: unusual for the Beatles, where it is generally to the main composer of the title that returns this role
So good. What great harmony.
i love this guy. the youtuber that posts all of these. thanks a ton !!! (:
One of my favourite tracks from the Fab Four brilliant 👍
I would go so far as to say ,the Beatles influence all the modern music that came after them .
they influenced the entire r&r scene but in late 70's when disco was shoved up us, they had nothing to do with that, or punk and definable not rap. Beatles influence groups like Beach Boys that influenced Beatles . All of the music of that era fed off each other, but it would have been lame if not for Beatles!
@@martincvitkovich724 ,Yes Agreed , they certainly influenced me , and i went on to play in bands for some 40 years , i think because of them .
Damn, I think this just became my new favorite Beatles vocal track.
Legendary. By late ‘65, the Beatles were becoming cool AF.
Rob Philpott: Huh? The Beatles were never NOT cool. They were an overnight sensation in America in 1963.
Nah man they were and still are cool since 60’
I was already in a band, when they broke in February, '64 ... They were beyond cool, right from the start.
They were cool in their early years. Raw, loud, aggressive, and pure rock was the music they played in their cavern club and hamburg era. Probably the first band to have the pure straightforward unpolished underground essence of rock n roll.
"I - tried to please her." I've heard, and played this song a thousand times, and I never knew he said I - tried to please her, I only ever heard "Tried to please her."
Ikr
Ooohhh this little treasure right here!!. Nice and loud and clear.
This is quickly becoming my favorite channel.
Lennon is a master
A couple of fantastic Ringo Starr transitional rolls.
I can't add a thing except they are the best there ever was, the best there ever will be. Thanks, JPGR for everyting.
And if you disagree with me, I'll flail (Flail?) you with my synthetic Beatle wig!
Amazing voices!
Simply amazing
I love these... I never noticed before; there's a minor slip up by Paul, I believe; around 2:07. It sounds like he starts to sing the lyrics from an earlier chorus, but then catches himself and corrects it. Sound like "A one-day driver, yeah". Sort of a mash up of "one-way ticket" and "Sunday driver". Anyone else hearing that?
yeahh😂
Yeah I heard it hear but never on the actual song. They do the same thing on please please me you can hear it really clearly.
OMG LOL. Never realized that until I read you’re commenting it and hear it carefully in this isolated track.
Actually, these little “goofs” were very common during their early recording years. John was notorious for forgetting even his own lyrics but being the pros they were, they kept on playing/recording. Of course, studio time wasn’t cheap so if the goof wasn’t that huge, it made history!
Yup :)
actually The Beatles changed the way we live our lives , but just few of us admit it
Laurentius Widiawan i Agee. John Lennon inspired me to be an activist for peace and love. He made me Imagine. I
Good lord that is great
When time put these 4 gentleman together it created a virtuous circle! These guys made each other better, while in some other bands it works the other way ‘round.
Best song by the Beatles, as in them working as a band and each member at their absolute best.
Thank you for posting. I can practice the song and I won't feel like a fool singing along with the car radio....
Because The Beatles were The Beatles, it may be unappreciated that their voices and harmonies are peerless.
Greatest band of All - Time !
I had to sing lead on this at a summer rock camp when i was eighteen. I mustve listened to it fifty times in a row the day before the performance, i was so nervous about getting it right. I'd like to think i pulled it off but it's hard to recall now, honestly. I remember rehearsals a lot better than the actual performance.
The without the 🎶 music makes the Beatles voice sounds great because you can actually hear how the Beatles combine their voices together and sing that's makes the it more amazing
I love them endlessly
What a phenomenal vocal. God gave us a true gift when he got these Fab 4 together. They were truly a gift from heaven. I know they made my world a happier place.
Great voices and harmony.
The mixture of their vocals is one of the greatest things ever. And, no AutoTune needed.
As I've posted before, I've run out of accolades, hyperbole, praise for Johnny and the Moondogs. And, because I'm a 68-year-old Beatlemaniac and know whereof I speak, I say the world will never see their like again; that's for darned sure.
There will never be another you either, you're a part of the story!!!
If I'm having a bad day I simply play Rubber Soul, Help, or Revolver. The Beatles have been a huge part of my happiness for 40 years.
@@79goldmaster1 You know it. The world is a better place because of Beatles' music. I used to work as a staffer in Illinois Senate politics, and during sessions full of acrimony, vitriol, etc., I dreamed of the idea of breaking into the PA system and playing "All You Need is Love" loud. I ain't no hippie or flower child - I wouldn't have attended Woodstock for all the tea at Lipton's - but Beatles' music has such a soothing effect. The best ther ever was, the best there ever will be: JPGR!
godlike harmony right there
Incredible vocals.
Nunca me han dejado de gustar los Beatles y nunca pasarán de moda
凄い迫力だ😃サンキュー😆💕✨ナイス👍
Amazing!
*Loving singing out loud.*
Sensationally good with some really interesting harmony from John. The three were telepathic