Johnny Depp's Lawyer & LAPD Detective Testify in the Defamation Trial (Johnny Depp v Amber Heard)
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 05. 2022
- During the defamation trial on Thursday, pre-recorded depositions of Johnny Depp's lawyer Adam Waldman and LAPD Detective Marie Sadanaga were played in court. Sadanaga is a detective in the LAPD domestic violence unit with expertise on domestic situations.
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard
Listen to Law&Crime's Sidebar Podcast on Apple & Spotify:
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/0oAia38...
Written Coverage & Analysis of Johnny Depp & Amber Heard Trial:
lawandcrime.com/?s=Johnny+Depp
lawandcrime.com/?s=Amber+Heard
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter! bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on CZcamsTV!
tv.czcams.com/users/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK CZcams CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam - Zábava
In acknowledgement of JD's incredible generosity, he donated his entire salary for "The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnussus" to Heath Ledger's daughter. He did not pledge it. He actually paid it.
Love JD and heath ledger favourite actors never new that even more love for JD
Should have just pledged it. Apparently it's the same thing
Oh wow didn't know that! 😊
@@seegee9 lol nice
@@seegee9 She is a child who lost her father. :(
Elaine, a lawyer herself, repeatedly trying to get a lawyer to break attorney/client privilege is disgusting.
Yeah, and why is she wasting so much time , they have limited time. She must not have had anything better to ask anyone else?!!
Did she get her license online?! 🙄 What a complete waste of time!! She sounds & acts like she has dementia!! 🤦♀️
Well, she's incompetent so it's natural to her.
I'm wondering how an experienced attorney seems to have no knowledge of what an attorney can and cannot answer. Then again, she seems to have no knowledge of what "hearsay" is, or how to ask non-leading questions, either. How she ever won a case is a mystery.
She was an amateuer. Realløn disgusting
“I accept the instruction!” 👍 Priceless!!
Lol, I accept the instruction.- it fulfills me!
😂
I love how humble he is. I don’t mean this in a demeaning way at all. He is so adorable when he is like “Ok I’ll follow the instruction.”
ya real humble , literally represents russia oligarchs. and orchestrated the campaign of bots and leaks again heard.
I thought the same thing 😃
A man that understands the instruction!
Yes, I like his respectful manner and I can detect his intelligent lawyer's mind working with clarity.
He seems to have a really calm spirit tho! It‘s really nice listening to him
Amber never dreamed it would go this far. she just wanted the police call so she could file the TRO. she never imagined they'd ever be called back to testify. jokes on her!
Still should not have done it,
YUP
I did the similar thing. Reported injuries for documentation and told the police I was not pressing charges. But, eventually my ex got a warrant of arrest and made to face the judge in court. He was sentenced to community service and The incident was counted as a strike against him.
Ha!!! Got 'em. Karma at its finest.
She actually thought she was gonna be rich and famous. She thought she was gonna be an A list celeb
Waldman was my favourite witness. So professional. The best thing we learned about in his testimony, is that he is banned from Twitter for life, lol.
Omg crime of the century being banned from twitter aka shitter
@@tankgirl6446 😂😂
And then they ask “so do you have an acct now with Twitter?” What does FOR LIFE mean!!???
Being banned from Twitter is a badge of honour these days though. 😜
@@cowgirl_in_pink_pearls You can circumvent with a different phone # and email, and a lot of people have. Maybe that’s why it was asked.
Jury-"We find for the plaintiff Johnny Depp."
Everyone in the World:"We accept the instruction!"
I freaking love Adam Waldman! He has such an intelligent and precise way of putting Amber and her lawyers in their place! He communicates so much with saying so little!
YUP
Well Putin's friends like him. He has ruined Johnny Depp ever since he met him. Johnny has fired so many long standing employees and he is sue happy. That is all Waldman's influence. Don't be fooled.
Came across as an absolute crook to me.
@@ddk567t You realise he is being instructed to not break the law and expose himself to prosecution right?
It’s easy to look humble when you get a free pass to not incriminate yourself repeatedly. If only the general witness had such leeway 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why are we spend the first half of the court's time asking questions that he CLEARLY can't answer? Asking the exact same question over and over again. Amber's lawyers are ridiculous.
Her team is trying to show JD is hiding the fact that he was behind Adam Waldman’s statements about Amber Heard and that JD pushed him to reach out to the media. By JD not waiving attorney client privilege, it looks like he doesn’t want the jury to hear the truth.
All they do is waste time..on her side..no credibility
That's what I'm saying 🤣 Why is this witness even here, when he can't even talk about what he witnessed without mentioning his client?? What a snooze fest😴
the jury still heard the questions, it can be a way to plant some ideas in their head even if there's no answer
@@Anna-cx4tg I guess that makes sense. But, I doubt it will have the same effect that they would like it to have. There's nothing substantial being brought forward.
Imagine if in life we all had a hidden voice that’ll jumps in & warn you not to say a certain thing before you say something that’ll potentially do more harm than good
I accept instruction lol that would be nice 😂
We actually do have that voice we just don't listen it.
I think we do, it's called moral law or conscience. We got that from our guide trial session when we were kid, and it's depend to the person if they want to level up the bad one or the good one. Apparently, AH like to feed the bad one, it become class s tier, that she doesn't even realize what she did it's wrong, because in her world she would always think she is right, probably
LMAO! I DID-IT GOT WORN OUT AND QUIT! Lmao!
I would love to have a voice like that before I speak. I am to outspoken.
Waldman is great, his summary is spot-on: "So Amber and her friends spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist, and then placed a second call to 911"
timestamp
Sounds about right to me: hoax.
@@jdmnissan 33:25
Bingo
So basically this statement right here is why she was awarded 2 mill ?
She diposed Adam waldman so he couldn't represent JD in this case and included him in her countersuit. IT is ONLY because of THIS man that JD's evidence EVER came to light and people could see both sides and NOT just her narrative. HE actually heard and saw JD's evidence and decided to NOT just represent him BUT go out off his way to ensure that EVERYTHING was put out there. Getting him a lifetime Twitter ban.
Wow! Thanks for the clarification.
AMAZING BUT NOW HER BOYFRIEND ELON WHAT SHALL HE DO HES IN FOR IT LOVER OR FRIEND ID STAY CLEAR AWAY FROM THE NARCISSISTO LOL
@@sharonsobolewski3707 I'd say that ship has sailed. She probably has more on him then she ever did JD. Hence the loyalty 😉.
@@sharonsobolewski3707 hes already bolted. Lol.
@@sexyinnc YUP ATTENTION ALL MEN RUN DONT WALK LOL THE GOLDDIGGING NARCISSTO IS ON THE LOOSE LOL
Amber sold information to TMZ and now is suing Johnny's team for depositions to the media? Give US a break! She set the precedent!
and she still claims she didn’t give People magazine the pics of her and blames it on her former lawyers. lol
@@bob4135 She gave the,m to her lawyers who gave them to People.
It's interesting to watch the interaction between famous people, their image managers, and the press. And in this case, the ACLU.
somehow an intimate video of only her and Johnny filmed by her, and her face taken by her phone just ended up of magazines cover, so Convenient lmao
She's a bird tryna get feed she lied so much she believe her own lies
@@bob4135 I wish her former Attys would sue her for slander!
The grin when he acknowledges that his Twitter account was suspended is so great. It’s clearly a badge of great honor! 😂😂😂
He was spitting facts lol
He can make a different account. If he wanted to.
@@cb142 "You can't circumvent a Twitter suspension, enforcement action, or anti-spam challenge. This includes any behavior intended to evade any Twitter remediation, such as creating a new account or repurposing an already-existing account."
I love how Amber's lawyer keeps saying "when police officers see an injury". Sorry, but I don't think the jury has forgotten that officers under oath stated they saw no injuries.
Isn't that so ridiculous. The police saw nothing. I believe one cop recorded & found no disarray. They keep mentioning the cops, as if the cops agreed with their staged bruises. There were no bruises, that's why it wasn't documented. Amber & team shouldn't be able to show pictures of bruises, if the cops didn't see them.Thats the end of that story.
that part i wish they quit saying injuries when clearly a blind man could see that it wasn’t any to report. Sheesh
Exactly...NO INJURIES!!!
Her face was injured and her make up artist confirmed that. Defining injury is a difficult thing unless it's so blatant and someone is beaten to a pulp. The cops have better things in place now to always record incidents which if they had had that at the time everything would be simpler now. Edit to comment.. simply WOE! I made a simple comment to receive a barrage of nasty back... Apparently ppl can't have an opinion unless they agree
@@bereal6590 lol you mean when she punched herself in the face…. What she said in her testimony 🤣🤣🤣
Thank you so much to team Amber for bringing in Adam Waldman. I’m sure the jurors LOVED hearing the word “perjury” consistently associated with “Amber heard”. It just made Johnny’s case better.
ikr hahaha i came to the point that I am confused who's witness is on the vid since they gave JD more points here
@@2Btoobee sadly, they don’t have anything 😭 maybe if Amber hadn’t lied that much and had also told her attorneys the truth they could’ve worked out a decent strategy but this is just becoming a satire tbh..she would be better off telling the truth now 🤣🤣
You made me laugh in loud voice 😂🙌🏼
not to mention amber tweeted calling him short, now she has the nerve to call him to testify for her? so funny
@@Roxy-tw4hi he is what you can consider a hostile witness. They knew he isnt on their side but they summoned him there. Their goal was to prove Johnny has something to do with Waldmans article for AHs 100M counter claim. Which obviously backfired hehe.
This guy seems like the kind of Lawyer one would want to have in their corner. People generally don’t like lawyers, but this guy seems like he’s a threat if he’s NOT in your corner.
People in general don't like smart people because if they are ever competing with said people either for a position for a job, a school competition or being questioned by one who is therefore in the role of a lawyer they feel threatened and know they lack the skills and mental capabilities and thus feel inferior and instead of feeling being inferior they use anger and dismissal as a means to overcome the overwhelming feeling of knowing that someone is more intelligent than you exists in the universe.
Mr Walkman will be getting paid a fortune to say nothing. If all I had to do in the witness box is say I can’t answer for hundreds of pounds/dollars an hour, I would be happy to testify on Ambers behalf.
@@we4r119 paid the money out of the settlement or Elon's pocket aswell no doubt she's a joke
Just the sound of this woman’s voice tires me. She is exhausting. Asking questions over and over that she knows he can’t answer. She is horrible
I believe AH lawyers have no case to present, so they have to fish for some lucky answer. Even Morgan Freeman's voice would sound terrible if he represented AH.
exactly. shes awful. I would definitely ask for my money back.
Am msnbc ,FBI,law & order Blue blood , trust me this lawyer is the most ignorant i ever see .
Agreed
She just creates much ado about nothing, such a waste of time......boring!
It's pretty obvious the strategy Amber's team attempted. They wanted to plant the seeds of doubt on whether there were instructions from Johnny to his attorney. But with the ridiculous amount of redundant questions, I think the jury was more bored than anything else.
well it's not a show, so who cares if its not entertaining. most court cases aren't entertaining.
If she had better/more supportive witnesses in her favor, AHs team would have never called many of these witnesses. The only witnesses that have been favorable to her are Dr Hughes and her sister.
@@jedixneuf Yeah, but retaining the jury's attention and not making them feel like their time is being wasted is a step into convincing them of your narrative...
@@B_Bodziak Dr Hughes was a joke and her sister lied under oath.
@@B_Bodziak Debatable on if they were even favorable. Especially her sister who admitted that she was "rarely sober" and her entire story does not match the story told by Amber Heard at all. If anything, it was a waste of time to give the jury a long winded story that just harms credibility of both Heard and her sister.
summary of the whole deposition
amber"s lawyer: asks a question
depp"s lawyer: i would instruct the witness not to ans that question on the grounds of attorey client privilege.
Adam waldman: I accept the instruction.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
So essentially this is a case of who you believe. 3x police officers, or Amber's drunk sister...
They're trying so hard to get something out of the officers.
4 officers I believe
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Now police could sue her for defaming them no?
a very professional and consistant approach taken by Depps legal team when advising his former Lawyer on client Confidence. The pauses that the Lawyer took to first give opportunity for his guiding Lawyer to instruct one way or another was formal and very tidy. When not receiving advise, the Lawyer answered in a short definitive manner. Loved watching Heards Lawyer try her best and failed to make any real headway.
I really liked that. So professional and quiet impressive.
I think it's bizarre that Heard's lawyer must know all the things she cannot ask and stil does probably hoping to trip up the witness but really just wastes a lot of time for nothing.
@@wendeln92 not really because it's clear why depp didn't wave... because Waldman went ahead and put out these defamatory comments deliberately and probably under depps instruction. Also shows Depp was suing everyone! That Waldman is also a vindictive snake
I am sitting here, wondering wtf AH's team possibly hopes to get out of this lawyer? I'm not a lawyer or an attorney but even I know there are two witnesses that will almost always say nothing, or almost nothing - lawyers & doctors. This was a waste of time imo.
@@wendeln92 They subpoenaed him so they could ASK these questions and put them in the jury’s mind, knowing he couldn’t answer most because of attorney-client privilege, but the jury can never unhear what they heard. Same way that an attorney might say something that might be stricken from record, but jury can’t unhear what they already heard. It plants seeds in the jury’s minds and they know that. That’s why this guy was subpoenaed, not a willing witness for AH.
ETA: this is a common tactic, not just AH’s lawyers. Doesn’t always work, like we can see with the district attorney in Rittenhouse’s trial, but this judge has not been biased like Judge Schroeder clearly was.
There was no injury, ever! And, she stood right across the room, away from the police officers, because she hadn't had time to apply her 'injury' makeup! They arrived much quicker than she had hoped!
Omg ik how many times do we have to belabor the same points w the PD.
Yes
🤣 yes!!
@RCMKPS her "bruise kit" she says. Lol
she should be applying ice or something on her face at that point.
As a juror I would have been frustrated with the inappropriate questions by Amber's lawyer. No question should be asked that requires "the violation of attorney-client relationship."
Can we turn the clock back a couple of weeks, when I didn’t know who Amber Heard was? Please?
I don’t know her at all until this defamation trial.
I don't know who she is as well, not until this issue.
🙋♀️
I'm all for turning the clock back, as long as I don't have to experience this all over again.
Take care
😊🌻
@@katherinethouret6110 Same!
Never heard about AH, only watch 1 movie with JD in my life! I don't even watch Oscar events. I'm not interested in movies or actors. They are just guys like you and I that are doing a job.
Does Elaine even thinking that her questions will break Attorney-Client privilege? She just keeps on asking questions that are not even allowed to be asked.
Well she wasted her sides time doing it. That's a plus
She isn’t a good lawyer , but at the same time your Defending a person like Pathological liar Amber heard .
she's allowed to ask. He's not allowed to answer if he wants to keep his license to practice law.
thats not her job to care. that's HIS job to care lol
@@Obsolete569 Amber Heards lawyer knows better. She's wasting tax payers money today and yesterday.
45 mins later and this guy still accepts the instructions. This lady don't get it.
Amber defamed Johnny. Period. Her counter lawsuit is simply retaliation and another attack, to try to minimize Johnny's claim. She absolutely defamed, libelled and slandered him.
Also she admitted that it WAS in fact about Johnny, when Camille questioned her. She admitted it.
Yup. Sick.
She says she not digging gold but asking for 7 plus million after a 15 month marriage and trying to get clout as an ambassador for battered women would guarantee her more roles and money on the back end (if it indeed worked) but it backfired on her and now she has to face the consequences.
💯
She already got away with 7M and the public was on her side. But she just wouldnt shut up lol.
Justice for Johnny Depp and all survivors of domestic violence!
And for people who suffer from alchohol and drug problems.. Ambers framing that all addicts are violent.
Thank you
Thank you, so many are in this obscene arena because most abusers are either narcissistic, manipulative, abusive & liars if not ALL of them. How many people know how to combat these very evil deep personality diviantes!?
Justice for Johnny Depp who is an alcoholic and a drug addict, the perfect role model for today's generation of idiots.
@@jarkinmalarkin Why don't u guide him how to quit his addictions? because so far, he hasn't been able to do it, kill the monster inside him. He is a violent man when drunk or high, you heard the testimony.
I genuinely don't understand why Amber's team called him to testify, and what they gained from this, because the whole video is just him being instructed not to answer.
Subpoenaed
Probably hoping he'd slip up and reveal something juicy through the attorney-client confidentiality, or maybe a limp attempt to make it look like Depp was hiding something.
Some people perceive a non answer = a sign of withholding or hiding something.
Elaine is a JD fan
Yes but why is this intruder lrgalnlayer allowed to instruct thr witness? Thr objections should go to the udge forbher to decide?. Frickin lawyers. This is total BS.
She asked unauthorized questions at least 90% of the time.
I think she asked them in order to imply that JD instigated his attorney’s actions. She was trying to plant seeds of doubt. Not saying it will succeed; I just believe that was her strategy. Not sure the questions were unauthorized, just bound to get no real answer.
good god is this lady for real?? This is just awful. Literally every question she’s asking he’s objecting to.
All I got from that detective's testimony was that if the officers responding to the DV call didn't make a report, they must have determined that no DV occurred AND they were likely told by the people present that there was nothing to report. So either none of the police did their job properly, or there was no incident of DV.
I believe that's what they do now and make a report regardless but at the time unless they could successfully identify a crime of sorts they'd not go further regardless, particularly if the 'victim' didn't want to go further. Where I live this has been in place many years. They don't require significant injuries or property damage. They take the potential perp away for questions regardless which is brilliant as then if they're innocent there is vindication but if they're guilty it's on file straight away for any future calls or problems
@@bereal6590 this occurred in CA *after* the Chris Brown/Rhianna DV mess. I'd imagine those procedures were put in place shortly after that incident in 2009. Idk for sure though.
I looked it up. In the state of CA, if the police determine some type of DV occurred, or they suspect DV occurred, they *do not have to wait for a witness to press charges*. They can/will go and pick up the suspect. This was LA - the cops live to arrest celebrities because it brings them into the spotlight and aids in their career promotion. I'm betting they saw no evidence of physical assault on AH. I think what Walden said - her friends messed up the place and spilt whine is probably more accurate.
@@MeMe-lw5xy I'm pretty sure she can still see, don't be rude
The excessive description Amber testified isn't recorded by police because police observed nothing to make a report on.
The conversation with the lawyer can be summed up as follows:
"I would instruct the witness to not to answer because he can't answer without disclosing attorney client communication"
"I accept the instruction"
Was a waste of time to even have him on the stand
Wasted everybody's time. They keep asking like the same questions and they can't get an answer
literally lol
Heards lawyer is embarrassing. This is like an SNL skit.
@@LindyandDevin But it was a waste of THEIR time. LOL All was not wasted because Waldman said under oath that AH and Racqui are under investigation for PERJURY and that AH trolled him on Twitter and that AH has not yet proven that anything he leaked is untrue. If what he leaked is true, then it is not defamation.
"I'm trying. I'm trying."
- Elaine
shes a gold digger
She must have a serious migraine defending someone she knows is a monster.
She is very trying.....
Johnny, has an excellent team.. The nerve of them to bring one of "his" lawyers, to question..
Yeah and it backfired. Adam is a very talented lawyer. They should’ve known better
@@songhenry1084 I don't understand what's happening in this video. So this gentleman is Amber team's witness? He is also a lawyer for Johnny Depp? you mean in previous UK case?
This comment, like a most comments here, is another skeleton comment. There's a bot behind it
They are questioning him because he is a principal in the case. Amber alleges that he defamed her.
@@kiminterviewer huh?
“Has Mr. Depp paid you for your services?” Maybe she feels she is gonna get scammed by Amber 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
Amber ‘Pledged’ the payment to her.
😂😂🤣🤣
😭😂
All I can say is I’m glad JD has the people he does in his corner.
Paying them a lot of Money. He buys people
He has kept paid employees enablers and money hungry ppl like snake waldman around. He even alienates hisister calling her psychotic
@@freedomjusticehappiness5773 think you're right, very entitled thing to do and doesn't get you honesty
@@freedomjusticehappiness5773 you’re funny 🤣
@@freedomjusticehappiness5773 😂
All of a sudden Amber is sitting between her lawyers instead of just next to one, always copying Johnny 🙄
Probably so she can give him a big hug to replicate Johnny and Camille. She's probably wearing her bee earrings too.
Or they are trying to make sure she doesn’t walk out the court room again before the jury exits 😂😂
Correct. Thought the same this morning. Thank you.
@@helen6191 she left them on the stand when she tried to hurry off so she could act scared of Johnny when she came face to face with him. They’re just blue screen ones I bet.
Except that they seem to be complete strangers sitting next to each other
He stays so calm and polite while elaine is asking the same questions over and over again and that voice just keeps objecting/instructing not to awnser. I would just walk away haha.
That voice is his current lawyer.
He can’t walk away, as he’s been subpoenaed as a witness to testify under a deposition. You wouldn’t be able to just walk away either.
@@xdra31 i know, but i would want to haha
Krista Kuipers that voice is JD's lawyer
Why is asking questions that requires to disclose attorney client privileges over and over not considered wasting courts time?
She is trying to get enough to infer agency and with this guy it is not easy. Ever since this attorney got ahold of Johnny, he has fired people and started many lawsuits. This guy has ties to Putin and I think he is the control freak of Johnny and put all this in his head to sue the world. There is another lawsuit coming where Johnny is being sued for assault on a crew member. But that isn't Waldman's doing.
My thoughts exactly! They should've dismissed her, or otherwise told her to move on to her next point, after the first 5 objections! I very much admire both these men for their incredible amount of patience while dealing with Amber's miserable excuse for a lawyer.
I suspect JD’s attorneys may make a bit of an argument out of that depo fun.
Something like, “And AH’s attorney tries to hoodwink you into thinking that Waldman is doing something wrong by refusing to be unethical OR violate Johnny’s confidentiality rights, which are, by the way, a damned REQUIREMENT by the Bar. He cannot unilaterally waive his client’s privilege! They’re taking the AH route - make up a story and try to trick you into believing it….yada yada yada.”
@@sepifi after the first 2. Why does this judge have patience? I don't even
That is because AH's attorneys either are not bright or are grasping at straws lol.
I wish Dr. Curry educated everyone especially the jury on some psychological manipulation technics. This whole case is just gaslighting and projection.
Interestingly when a person suffers from bdp they often manufacture facts to fit there emotionally state instead the other way around
I believe Dr. Curry will be testifing again next week. Johnny's team still has around 18 hrs left to call witnesses.
Any LA jury would see through her bs act. I hope the Virginian jury is up to the task.
My thoughts too, but isn't this standard practice? Lawyers asking questions a certain way, omitting other questions etc. The computer guy seemed especially naive to this, he seemed to almost take it personally when the validity of his observations were put into question.
@@jacquelineorr5479 that would be amazing! Really hope you’re right my friend:)
One minute into the first deposition he paused before answering if it was ok to respond lol. I also liked he concurred “it would” and “I accept the instruction.”
Freaking Love this guy - he brought a binder of evidence showing Amber’s lies!
I like how he waits to hear if he should answer the question
He knows , he is a lawyer 😄. This is just to make sure that Chew speaks first
I'll miss seeing JD everyday after this is over, but I'll be happy for him. I'll miss witnessing the brilliance of Ben and Camille, too!
He said he was banned from Twitter for life, but she asked if he has a Twitter account. Did she think he was gonna say he made fake accounts
@@difficult9783 Yes indeed. Twitter must know best what’s good for all of us.
If I were AH, I would be furious that her lawyers would waste these precious hours on questioning JD’s lawyer who could only answer 10% of the questions asked.
Why be furious if she was educated enough in her line of work,she very well knows how to ask questions the right way for her client. I would think maybe she's not team Amber anymore 🤔 There's been rumors circulating.
right? all his , ALL his witnesses,,they don't remember anything, they re not really sure, they just cant remember...and JD laughs. gross
and also .. aren't they ALL paid by him lolol he is literally their lifeline/employer. i mean.. yo
LOL Waldman said under oath for the jury to hear that AH and her friend Racqui are under investigation for perjury and that AH was trolling him on Twitter. AH has not yet proven that anything he leaked to the media is untrue or that she lost anything because of it.
I love Mr waldmans face when they discuss his ban for life on twitter. His face ,to me, says "worth it!" Lol
Elaine:"You've been suspended from Twitter for life; correct?"
Mr.W: "Yes!"
Elaine: "Do you have a Twitter account now?"
Umm apparently Elaine uses lifetime suspension synonymously with limited suspension.
Poor Elaine! AH ruined her.
I feel thats a notable quote, "I use those synonymously" "Well, I don't" 😹
lol !!! was thinking the same thing!’🤣
😂😂😂
Ben was on fire with this - he even added those little comedic flares. I’m just amazed Elaine sounded _almost_ unfazed, she did get as angry as she did with Camille. Maybe her composure wore down the longer this circus went on.
Elaine is a terrible attorney.
I can see why this case is going way better.
Waldman made a mistake round the 15 minute mark. Chew directly picked it up and said it was an illegal action and emphesized his instructions a bit quicker for Waldman to not answer.
Sorry she didn’t get as angry as with Camille **
Yeah I think she just doesn't care anymore and knows she isn't going to win so she is just asking random stuff just to waste time and make it look like she tried lol
Wasn’t this pre-recorded?
Amber heards team has 8 hours left and JDs team has 18 hours left. The rebuttal next week will be just as amazing as Ambers cross examination. I KNOW JDs team is going for the kill next week. Leaving a lasting impression on the jury :).
Hope so
I’m truly hoping so. Johnnys team really need to have the last say and impression on the jury’s minds. Not the lies and rubbish of ambers term.
Yesssss 🙏🙏🙏
Exactly! You can see them planting little bits here and there throughout questioning. It’s kinda like foreshadowing. They’re very aware of how to time everything for maximum influence later.
Amen!
I'm only 15 minutes in and this is hilarious! He basically can't state anything unless it's public knowledge and AH's lawyer keeps asking the same questions, only phrased differently, to slip him up. It's pretty pointless him being there and so far it's a waste of the court's time... but i'll stick around to see how incompetent her lawyers are... 🤣
Sickening that they are trying to discredit the officers!
My understanding of all this is, Amber Heard was planning, at some point, to leave Johnny Depp, however, in order for her to continue living, with all of her friends, in Johnny's penthouses, she had to concoct an elaborate ruse. Amber's main objective was to not have her moneyed lifestyle interrupted. First she had to file for an IMMEDIATE TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) accusing Johnny, before a judge, specifically stating the words, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, and make her court appearance as severe as possible (injuries). If granted, she could continue to live as usual, (off of Johnny). Amber Heard would not have known this if not advised by her lawyers (originally, in the divorce, she asked for three of the town houses, a Land Rover, and spousal support for life). In a text between Amber's now deceased mother, and Johnny after Amber filed The TRO, Amber's mother is telling Johnny over and over the lawyers made her file, or she would have to vacate the penthouses in thirty days. Amber had to create the situation, which got the ball rolling. Amber was on the phone with io Tillet (her friend in NYC), while arguing with Johnny. io decides to call 911 based on conversation between Amber and Johnny. io then calls Raquel Pennington who lives in penthouse next door with husband, Josh Drew. Raquel calls 911. It takes about an hour or so for the two officers to arrive. During that waiting time another call is made from penthouse lobby, three calls now made to 911 (Raquel would not admit making the third call from penthouse lobby, but the voice recording on 911 sounds the same as her voice). To make this situation seem extremely dire, they (io and Raquel) placed THREE calls to 911. Johnny Depp had long since left the penthouse. When officers arrived, Josh Drew answered Amber's door. He assures the officers that Johnny is no longer there, and all is well. After three calls, the officers insist on talking to Amber. They come in with body cam rolling, and later testify Amber had no injuries and no disarray to penthouse. No one is cooperative with the officers, and Amber doesn't want to file a compliant. Amber's intent in all this wasn't to file a formal written compliant with officers, but to have this on record when she went before judge to get TRO. The officers see no injuries to Amber Heard, their body cam shows no damage to penthouse, they do a walk thru, and the officers leave. Now, do I have this right based on what every one else has heard. So much information - hope jury has a timeline of events or they can't keep all info straight. Each occurrence is crucial, so many lies.
You are spot on! Thank you!
You’ve got it!! Every word you said is 💯 correct!!! She never knew it would go this far. But she underestimated Johnnys bravery and willpower. I’m so glad to see her being caught in the moment of truth in her lies!!!!
Excellent. Thankyou. Helped me!
Excellent recap.
THATS FUNNY LOOK FOR THE SEQUEL TO GIRL INTERRUPTED STARRING AMBER HEARD LOL
why didn't AH ever yell for security...they seem to arrive within seconds when JD beckons them
EXACTLY. She NEVER mentions even once ever summoning for security after her alleged "ambuse"
She testified that when they quarreled, the security people were always protective of Johnny so she had no reason to even try ..
@@tal32 nice execuse but probably because she was attacking always xD
I can't believe she is blaming the lack of physical evidence on the attys so frigging narcissistic.
Because she never need them only Johnny did
AH lawyer is like trying same password to unlock a phone over and over again
I'm surprised Amber's attorneys didn't yell "objection" in real-time during this pre-recorded testimony 😃😂🤣 Also, Elaine's attempt to discredit Johnny really backfired!
Give it a day it will
Happen! 😂🤣
OMG, I initially thought Johnny had another opportunity to bring in more witnesses. I was like, 'Wow, these people are really backing up Johnny's corner!' But nope, it was Amber's team unintentionally giving Johnny more ammo to use against Amber. XD
of course it was !! Amber’s testimony was based on all lies
@@dantespimp exactly. They are burning their own time to help Johnny (unknowingly I assume?) 😂😂😂
This deposition just demonstrated how a lawyer is a legal ride or die
Yeah, a "shark tank" is nothing compared to this.
Well, if he'd blabbed confidential conversations with his client, without any legal compulsion to do so, he might as well find a new job!
I have never seen lawyers testify so much in asking questions, in my life. Ask the question but do not testify.
I’ve sat here and viewed this whole video and come to the conclusion that all her lawyers did is try to fill the heads of the jurors with a whole bunch of useless information to give the jurors information overload. None of it from the detective deters from the facts of the officer’s statements that there was no physical damage at all to Amber or the apartments on the dates that she said and produced the made up and staged pictures of said evidence. The officers by their statement and reports they filled out prove that she is a liar and guilty of perjury!!!!!
absolutely!!! And she needs to have charges brought up against her for that as well.
Agree. Watched all of Amber witnesses and all they say is Johnny drank and did drugs but not one could state under oath he ever hit her. They could only say under oath Amber told them. It was all a waste of time.
Very well said !!!👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
It is correct that police officers; when dealing with domestic violence, should first investigate if the victim really suffered injury or she is amber heard.
absolutely that’s the first sign they look for.
😆
😅 Precisely
Lmao
🤣🤣🤣righto mate !!!
Yes!! He communicated to internet journalist. Who helped us see the real evidence in full details. Unlike the main stream media who will give us snippets of information that is sometimes clouded by their own bias. I stop watching tv for years except for the weather news.
I use the weather app 😎
Your exactly right.
*TEAM JOHNNY FOR THE WIN*
I'm shocked the defense is allowing Elaine to speak at all. enough already!
I’m waiting for the Jury to see thru all Amber lies and all this BS. and then reward Johnny ....👍
Elaine Barkan was a credible witness.
Allow her to waste time
Screw that, anything to bury AH further in the dirt I accept.
@@dmarino2139 Says who? A bitter ex from almost 30 years ago. Johnny broke it off when she wanted more. Zero claim he touched her. Look up her last divorce. She's probably coached Amber.
Win or lose - Team Johnny!! ❤️
I’m at minute 5 and I don’t understand why this is useful. No questions are able to be answered except “I’m an attorney and I get a paycheck”
she is trying to plant seeds of doubt , it was two hours of Elain sayings , things like .. You leaked this ,, and johnny told you to do that , you two conspired to do this .. she knows he can't answers .. it is legal strategies .. In my opinion was fine by me as i felt she was wasting time. and her trickery didn't have the impact she hoped it would have. made her look desperate , and foolish. They only have 8 hours left on defense . team depp has 18 hours left ..
This interview called : I accept the instructions
😂
I love how the lawyer waits a bit after every question for a little. It's as if he wanted Depp's permition to answer the question
51:58 this man is a true king. he’s so cool😭
As an attorney herself, you would think she would know better than to ask questions like this!
Calling Det. Sadanaga did not help the defense. I cannot wait to hear closing arguments. The defense statement is going to be great entertainment.
It's such a shame a lot of the guys here don't seem to know who Adam Waldman is. He was pretty instrumental in getting a lot of info about Amber out for the public back in 2020.
Oh really?? Cuz I was lost. Completely lost. Who is he?? And why was it bad for him to say what he wanted? Isn't that freedom of speech?? Is that y Twitter banned him??
I am one of those people who don't know who Waldman was. I never knew who Amber Heard even was. I was not a fan of Depp nor seen most any of his movies. So don't assume everyone knows information about Depp. Many people don't follow anything related to Hollywood and their movie "stars"!
@@dmarino2139 I wasn't assuming anything. I just thought it was a shame that someone who helped bring to light a lot of the details of the case seemed to be unknown by the general public. Especially in the Law and Crime live chat, with some people calling him one of Amber's "freeloader friends" and stuff like that when he was first introduced.
Yeah... there's a reason that he's not only not allowed to be part of JD's team in the court room, but also, a reason that he's being advised not to answer any questions while on the stand.
@@karenopet1223
It's a pretty straightforward basic legal tenet. Once someone is engaged as an attorney to represent anyone, All of their conversations and correspondence become privileged. A lawyer could and shpuld be disbarred for sharing any of their private communications with a client. That law, in those specific conditions, prevails and supercedes the first amendment rights to free speech.
TECHNICALLY, the attorney always still has the RIGHT to speak freely; they cannot be legally punished for this by the government. However, the Bar Association(s) of any States where they are licensed to practice law will revoke their license to practice if they violate attorney-client privilege.
I hope this clears things up for anyone questioning why Waldman could not answer so many questions.
Also, Heard's lawyers -- ANY LAWYER -- KNOWS those questions cannot be answered by another attorney ... so basically, presenting just about that entire deposition was a complete waste of the court and jury's time. Clearly, the only reason the taped testimony was shown was to attempt to confuse jurors who do not understand the law and imply some bad things are maybe going on relating to Waldman's employment by Depp.
The reason he is not allowed to be on council in court is because, as a witness, he cannot be present for other witnesses' testimony.
I love how much Amber hates Waldman. She cannot cope with being called out!
Exhausting as all heck.
Adam esq was more loyal than Depp's friend of 40 years smh
He will not answer what you want to hear, Elaine. 😂 btw I love what Adam Waldman has done for JD 😂👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 I'm his fan!!
It feels like sometimes the lawyers just ask the questions to ask them, knowing the witness isn't even gonna answer
Right! So far they’ve got witnesses who cannot answer hardly any questions, someone who squatted in JD’s penthouse for 2 weeks and someone who he had a fling with in 1994 for a few months. It feels like they’re trying to run the clock out!
💰 🤑 💸 💲 💶 💵 💰
It's a tactic used for a couple of reasons. 1) In hopes it won't get "caught" before the witness answers and 2) To plant the seed of an idea (true or not) into the juror's mind.
It’s an attempt to create confusion in the hope someone makes a mistake. Like a gish gallop.
Well yes, obviously. If you ask someone: "did you break into 34 Primrose Drive on July 7 wearing a blue hat and steal a television set" and they say "I can't answer, it's privaledged" - who isn't left wondering. It's her job to introduce the queries, she's hoping the jury will plug the gaps in AH's favour.
I love this attorney (apparently Ben) that is advising Waldman. This disembodied voice disrupting Elaine.
Is Ben the one sitting next to Johnny
Why is this lawyer asking the other lawyer to violate attorney-client privilege over and over again?
they are trying to plant doubt in the Jury's mind by showing him to be Hostile Witness.
To show that JD might have instructed him and that is why he is actively hiding behind "attorney-Client" privileges 🤷♀
Exactly ‼️‼️‼️‼️
@@Bora_Eternal How do so many people not understand this?! 🤦♀️🤷♀️
@@BeaIEngio because they are no lawyers
Interesting to hear about a potential perjury investigation. Frankly, Amber's behavior this entire trial qualifies as a perjurous nuclear bomb.
And all of her friends that testified on her behalf over the years. They’ve lied too
@@christianbosse_ I would think the statute of limitations has expired for her friends.
@@steppy3736 it depends, most States have a statute of limitations between 5-6 years, so many of them could still be liable
AH lawyers wouldn't be where they are if they didn't have the credentials but this particular case is very difficult to defend because their client already undermined whatever strategy they had in place because of her own unreliable testimonies.
And yet you cannot deny their methods are hugely unethical and deceptive
it’s completely client led they can only be as good as the info they were given by the client
I wouldnt be shocked if she had some difficulty getting lawyered up because you can be as good as you want to be but when you have nothing to work with you have to do something in the courtroom, and your client giving you nothing or giving you lies will just make you look like you have no clue what youre doing, even if you are very good at your job. I feel like at this point her lawyers are just doing what they technically need to in order to avoid a mistrial
They likely researched the previous case thoroughly. Them being unprepared due to being misled makes no sense. AH's side had numerous inconsistencies in the previous case.
Very true. It's probably hard to defend their case because even the lawyers are confused , AH can't even recall her lies
This is just so sleazy. How can she possibly think this won't reflect badly on her client. It's disgusting.
I think she's doing it on purpose.
She hates Amber and she'll screw Amber over AND get paid.
@@justthinkin1710 can amber sue her after this on grounds of sabotage n bias and just plain incompitence?
@@justthinkin1710 That would be fine with me.
@@jodiegordon5559
I'm sure she can, but how would she prove that? Also....is incompetence a crime in the US? (Asking because I'm from Europe and really don't know, lol).
Anyway, I don't think she'd be successful, so I guess she'd rather save the money.
@@clarab6092 80% of our own police force would be arrested if it was a crime 😂 sadly it isnt
I believe an incident report, REQUIRES information from the complainant, or evidence.. NOT a bunch of angry muted fruads...and then blame the police, WOW that's gotta be a crime xx
exactly!! that’s a crime within itself
How is this lady a lawyer? Even I know not to ask those questions?
I accept the instruction
Where the heck is the judge at during this? They should’ve told this lawyer to move on from this asinine line of questioning…
This was a deposition taken weeks before the trial. The judge is not present. Objectionable questions can be later reviewed by a judge for determination as to admissibility. You’ll see jumps in the video where certain questions and/or testimony has been cut out.
I can't believe the judge allowed this non-sense in her court room!
She fell 😴
The disposition was pre recorder
Is it just me, or were the both depositions actually in Johnny's favour?🤔
Was Elaine just going through the motion of asking questions knowing that she will be objected to just to bill for her time? My goodness, the entire questioning line was asked for the sake of asking. Not sure if she put some thoughts to the questions knowing client attorney privilege exist. Or maybe she just want to ask so that it put the questions to the audience/juror's head regardless of whether there is an answer or not.
You're correct. She had to know that the majority of her questions could not/would not be answered. It was just a tactic to get her asinine questions, which are really nothing more than statements in the form of a question, before the jury.
Yes I think the goal is to plant seeds
@@resipsaloquitur854 is that any good of a strategy? Wouldn’t the jury just be annoyed at this point maybe even bored and tired of this rotation
@@johanzo88 Well, I didn't say it was an efficacious strategy. lol. At this point, I would have to assume the members of the jury are at least as annoyed as most people seem to be by Bredehoft's "performance." Can you imagine sitting through multiple hours of her obnoxious and disrespectful nonsense every day?
I was wondering that! The jurors were prob picking their hangnails bored to death!
It's painful to watch AH's defence fall apart because JD's Attorneys are just on their A game 👏
I still don't understand the jury the jury awarding AH 2 million for defamation. Defamation is an untruth, w malice (because she's a public figure). Calling AH's injuries false is true! Witnesses testified no damages they could see. AH and Elaine both introduced her "bruise kit" which was false as not even manufactured in 2017. How can she be defamed????
Let alone by Johnny when he was not present or nor did the statements come from him directly
Its cause that statement accused her lawyers and publicists of advising heard and her friends to trashing the place and calling the police for the second time. There was no proof of that provided in court. All other claims by Amber heard was proved in court to be false. Jonny depp won essentially all his claims hence a win for him.
Johnny’s lawyer is so cute to me. I love his eyes and glasses. Way off topic but whatever. Justice for Johnny
Seems a bunch of women are commenting same thing on different channels, about this guy! I wonder if he is straight!
I thought he was cute too!
He has a 'Where's Waldo' vibe going on😊
I loved him too!
@@dfinite4089 he is married to a woman...a doctor
This is golden!
Amber’s attorney just loves hearing her own voice. It makes her look so ignorant how she continued to ask questions that violated attorney/client privilege.
So agree!
"It's basically the same question gussied up." 🤣 I love it.
Thank you for covering this and a
So a new age is lawyers have arrived
I found Mr Waldman a fascinating witness, particularly after I looked him up. His complexion did look marvelous and I discovered the skin care line is his wife’s, Dr Barbara Sturm, a huge name in that industry.
Is he using his wife’s skin care line? His skin does look quite smooth and flawless
He’s def a handsome man!
Respect to you mr Waldman
Her hyaluronic acid serum is magic.
He actually CARES about Johnny above n beyond a professional relationship it's obvious
I think it’s hilarious that this lawyer is basically answering 0 of her questions lol
Bredehoft is singularly the most disgusting attorney of all of them I've ever met, seen, or heard of (aside from those who are outright criminals.) Does she really believe that her shameful conduct before this jury is in any way going to help Heard's case?
Lmao when she said California was a Common Law state as opposed to the Community Property state it is. Wtf?
Amber Heard's lawyers have asked to dismiss the case and for the trial to end today. Generating a huge wave of ridicule and criticism on social networks, in addition to the request being denied by the judge in charge of the trial. Ben Rottenborn, Amber Heard's lawyer, asked that the case be dismissed because he considers that the balance towards Johnny Depp is unfair, alleging that at the moment the interpreter of the iconic Jack Sparrow is being favored by the weight of the public and the vast majority of media.
@@vale34761 I’ve never had to hire a legal team, but they seem so lacking in many aspects. You would have thought she could get the best $ could buy, yet these people don’t seem to be that contingent. But maybe it will all work out and she’ll lose lol.
@@vale34761 That's not a proper, legal reason to dismiss a court hearing, esp in the middle of one. I didn't see that, yet. I know that they had to file a Motion to Dismiss between the time JD rested and AH called her first wirness. That's in neay all cases.
@@B_Bodziak They already filed for the motion to strike i guess and the judge denied it. They can't do that now, without any proof.
Does Elaine not understand the law.😅
The detective said the officers did not consider ambers claims to be a domestic violence situation that's why Johnny was never arrested and it never went to court and this detective is saying that over and over in different ways but Elaine just keeps going with it lol
As if somethings going to change 😩
@@latoya278 I know right she's so strange, seems very unprofessional for a lawyer to