You are not imagining things! 5D classic sensor captures Superior signal to modern sensors! Proven.
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 03. 2024
- This is a demonstration that within its intended use and operational parameters the 5D classic sensor captures absolutely stellar amount of information, and has information content that is comparable, or even surpassing, modern highest quality sensors (namely the Leica M11 sensor) in this regard.
If you chilled out properly and found that the love for cameras and photography has increased in you, then you can help me chill through Buy me a coffee, which is a simple way to donate as low as 2$. Your continued support is most welcome, and will contribute to elevate this channel and to greatly aid my gear acquisition syndrome... so I can keep on being chill and share future treasures with you. This is my buymeacoffee account that is shared between my Real World Audio channel and this wonderful Shutter & Chill channel. Please indicate that you are contributin for the Shutter & Chill, unless you are here for the music bit, in which case it does not matter.. just chill:
www.buymeacoffee.com/RealWorl...
I appreciate every kind gesture. Greetings, János
From Spring 2006 to October 2008 I used a 5D to shoot NHL hockey for AP. The arena I shot in was pretty dark. At ISO 1250 I could use 1/500 @ f/2.8. Marginal settings for fast action, but it mostly worked. As long as I stayed below ISO 1600 the image quality was excellent. The files gave me great cropping and exposure flexibility for the wire service. The sensor quality actually made the slower 5D a better tool than my 1D MK ll in those conditions.
I switched to Nikon and D700 cameras in the fall of 2008, but I still remember that 5D very fondly. Cheers
I am amazed how well it stood up to the 1D mk II!!! I did not expect that. Reading your comment I tried out a few very super light shots with the 5D, pushing the limits, and I was amazed how well they turned out.
@@ShutterNChill Now, just to throw a wrench into the works. The D700 was better in every way.
The D700 had Better focus, better frame rate, better buffering and it gave ISO 1250 quality... at ISO 3200. If you want to preserve your passion for the 5D never try a D700, or D810 and absolutely never use a D850. They were all amazing.
Keep up the great work!
Thanks again!
Thanks, I have 2x 5ds
Goodness, those are phenomenal cameras! I think the 5DS sensors have the most amazing rendering Canon ever produced.
What lens would you recommend for the 5D?
I recommend two primes - one for wide angle, and another for portrait / tele.
I recommend whole heartedly the EF 85mm F1.8 USM for portraits. The EF 28mm F1.8 USM takes gorgeous landscape shots, but fails miserably at any portrait attempts and shooting people. These two have superb synergy with the 5D.
For absolute best (but expensive), my absolute recommendation is the Sigma ART 35mm F1.4. That lens takes the 5D to a whole different level in all areas, but it's not affordable at all. Also, for portrait the 85mm ART would also be the top recommendation, but sadly I do not have that lens.
Mate that just isnt true! What do you think you're doing. 😂
Here, I present DxO mark measurement data because it has surprised me very much as I expected the Sony to absolutely destroy the 5D in sensor measurements, and it did not. (Details in the video.) Although the data its accessible to everyone, I have not seen a single YT video going into such detail, hence this video. Also, because of that, I gave it a catchy title so that people get a chance to get familiar with sensor measurements. (How practical a sensor measurement is for you, that is a VERY DIFFERENT question. Probably that's why your surprised reaction.)
I suspect you reacted to the title without taking into account the actual data presented. Never mind. Thanks for commenting!
PS: on CZcams NEVER judge a video by its title!!! Titles must be catchy for the YT algorithm to pick it up and show to public. My advice if you find a video with a weird title and you watch it, then react to it based on its content, and not the title. More often than not the YT titles tell exactly the opposite of what you are going to find in the video. Thanks!
You are imagining things.