Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
The Unbiased Opinion
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 07. 2024
- In this episode of The Unbiased Opinion, the guy take a look at the Smash Ultimate roster and cut it in half! Who stays? Who goes? 42 stay and the rest leave, so who do YOU think made the cut? The usual nonsense ensues.
plz don't sue us Di$ney
Based, I'm surprised someone kept 2, if not all 3 DKC characters. 💪🦍
DK is great!
*Cuts Cloud because Square is to hard to work with
*Keeps Hero who is owned by the same company
Yes.
Marking Bayonetta as an obvious 3rd party out is wild when 3 of the 4 games in the series are Nintendo exclusives and 2 of them were just released in the last couple years
Bayonetta is owned by Sega, not Nintendo
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 Yeah it started with Sega, but Nintendo picked up the franchise and kept it going where it would otherwise have been abandoned after the first game. Now it’s an active franchise Nintendo specifically promotes. Plus, you kept Steve, like c’mon now an unbiased opinion would clearly see which one makes more sense for Nintendo to want to keep around in the roster
@@s18cyt Bayonetta is owned by Sega, not Nintendo
Minecraft is one of the biggest videogames to ever exist. It makes more sense for Nintendo to want Steve over Bayonetta.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 It makes more sense for Nintendo to want to market the games they own and profit from. Smash is one big advertisement for all the other franchises, probably the biggest. Nintendo profits directly from the Bayonetta series doing well, not Minecraft, and the licensing is already done and settled. If you wanted to be truly unbiased and only have one third party character make it, then the answer would be Sora given that he was the actual ballot winner. But we both know that with Disney licensing and him being third party that the likelihood of him appearing again is next to impossible. The likelihood of Steve being in the next one is not that far off from Sora especially compared to Bayonetta.
@@s18cyt I'm not interested in which character will better help out Nintendo financially. Steve is a more popular character from a much more popular franchise. Steve takes priority. I don't even know why you're arguing about Minecraft, the most popular game in the world, over characters like Simon or Mega Man.
We don't know for certain if Sora is the ballot winner since the results were never posted. Also, Sora won the ballot after several more popular characters already got it. I guarantee if the poll was done before any 3rd party character was added to the game, Sora would not win it.
I like your picks otherwise, but your perception of Fire Emblem is clearly tainted by bias against the series.
The last 5 fire emblem games have combined sold nearly 13 million units. It’s not a small series by any means.
The idea Metroid is “a hell of a lot more popular than fire emblem” in 2024 is just not true. The last 5 entries in the series by comparison have literally sold just over half as many units as fire emblem. That’s also only if you dont count federation force or prime trilogy either. Funnily enough they also both had a remake of a game from the early 90s release on the 3DS in 2017. SoV doubled up Samus Returns in sales despite the game it was remaking having been less popular and a Japan exclusive release.
You also didn’t even pick the mascot Fire Emblem character that basically every lord in the series is based on as the sole rep. Even if what you said about Fire Emblem’s popularity was true, Marth would always be the pick over Ike.
I have no bias. That's why we're the Unbiased Opinion, not the Biased Opinion.
Metroid is more popular than Fire Emblem. Always has been and always will be.
I kept Ike since he's considered by fans to be the best and most popular character in the franchise. Fire Emblem only gets 1 character since it is a smaller franchise with a new cast of characters (almost) every game. I want to keep recurring characters, not the newest flavor of the month which will look terrible in 10 years.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 Lol I hope this is a bit because you are somehow claiming to be unbiased despite completely ignorant of what you are talking about.
What evidence do you have to suggest Metroid is more popular than Fire Emblem these days? Fire Emblem since 2012 has sold more than Metroid has since 2004. Fire Emblem Heroes has made like 61 Million in revenue.
Its funny you are dunking on boomers and people that "dont play video games" throughout this video yet your perspective here is just as dated as them.
And you are contradicting yourself by choosing Ike over Marth. If you wanted to keep recurring characters with staying power over flavor of the month characters, you would pick Marth since you would know he's been in the most Fire Emblem games and is referenced in nearly all of them.
Yet you clearly know nothing about Fire Emblem and are allowing either ignorance or massive bias (despite claiming otherwise) to taint your opinion. Very disappointing for how much you were talking down the rest of the smash community for having similar tendencies.
@@cy4069 You're picking very arbitrary years to try to say FE sells better. And Pokémon Go has made over 5 billion in revenue, what is your point?
If you think FE is on the level of Mario, Zelda, or Pokémon, you might need help.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 Arbitrary? You don't know what you're saying. Maybe if I rephrased you'd be able to understand the point better. Fire Emblem in the last 12 years has sold better than Metroid has in the last 20. Since the first Fire Emblem game released to present day the series has outsold Metroid as well.
I think you are the one that needs help buddy, trying to pivot to something I never even said lol. Obviously Fire Emblem is not on the level of Nintendo's three biggest franchises. Its not even on the level of Splatoon or Animal Crossing.
It is absolutely a big series though, its a bigger series than many other Nintendo staples such as Metroid, Pikmin, Warioware, and Xenoblade. Its nearly on the same level as Kirby.
@@cy4069 You'll never guess which franchise isn't on this list lol
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_video_game_franchises
In the last 3 years, Metroid has outsold Fire Emblem. Anyone can play this game.
Nintendo considers these franchises to be their most important:
- Mario
- Donkey Kong
- The Legend of Zelda
- Metroid
- Pokémon
- Animal Crossing
- Pikmin
- Splatoon
Guess which franchise isn't on this list. I'll give you a hint, it's also missing from the wiki list!
If you're cutting an entire franchise but 1 you have to keep the face of it. Axing Marth and keeping Ike is like if you got rid of link or pikachu but kept Sheik or jigglypuff.
Not even close. Ike is seen as the most popular Fire Emblem character and one of the faces of the franchise. You can't say the same for Sheik or Jigglypuff.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 would you axe Pikachu but keep Greninja?
@@fearlessleader889 You need stronger bait.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 greninja was the most popular Pokémon with the 2020 pokemon of the year pikachu was like 20th so why would you keep pikachu if greninja is way more popular
@@Exotic_22 Would I cut the face of the biggest media franchise company in the world? Think about what you just asked.
>2 kid Icarus characters
>1 fire emblem character
>1 Xenoblade character
>Calls himself unbiased
It's only 1 KI Character. Echos don't count.
Yes, I am unbiased.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 you failed to mention that fire emblem: three houses sold more than arms.
Plus, Xenoblade 2 sold more than Xenoblade 1. If there's only one Xenoblade rep, Aegis would be the better choice.
Plus, Nintendo owns more rights to Bayonetta than Pokemon. Nintendo and Sega each own 50% of Bayonetta. Nintendo, Game freak, and Creatures each own 33% of Pokemon.
@@fearlessleader889 I never said 3 Houses sold more than ARMS. I said ARMS outsold most FE games.
Nintendo does not own 50% of Bayonetta, Sega owns 100% of Bayonetta. You're not the first person to make this mistake which is weird.
Id say keep the miis. U prob could just combine em into 1 if u dont wanna keep all 3.
U should keep marth around. Hes an og. Plus u need to keep the sword archetype
Also min min is badly designed u should nit keep.
I'm just not big on custom characters in smash. The whole appeal is the crossover of famous characters.
It was between him and Ike and I've seen people say Ike is more popular. I don't care either way.
I think Min Min fine. Nobody plays like her which is why I wanted to keep her.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 true. I just feel like miis are beginner friendly and help people branch off 2 diff chars. Plus it fits the party game feel.
Also marth is more popular in smash.
Although i like ike.
@@dagoodboy6424 Smash fans may like Marth more but that isn't the only thing to consider. They also like Roy who is very unpopular outside of smash.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 thats prob true. Idk i dont play fire emblem. I just kno you want 2 keep old fans and bring in new ones. It be wise 2 keep veterans like marth unless u can find a fitting replacement ig.
@@dagoodboy6424 I get it but I'd rather keep more franchises than have extra FE characters. Plus FE isn't a top tier franchise for Nintendo, so other characters take priority over them.
Wants to cut Marth so your list is instantly invalidated. Listen I understand wanting to cut fire emblem characters but leaving two from the same game and cutting the first fire emblem main character is pretty crazy. Also fire emblem is a huge series and the smash bros fans hate for it is simply not justified.
I'm not keeping Chrom or Lucina. I'm saying that since they are echos, they aren't considered in the cut down. They only stay if their base character stays. I'm only keeping Ike.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 That is even worse jesus christ. Dude I am looking more at your list and I am convinced you made it just to bait comments. Everyone here is saying a different way that your list is stupid as fuck. God man
@@kayden2119 If you really think I made the list to bait comments, you need to go outside lol. It's just a CZcams video, it's not real. Not everyone has to like Fire Emblem.
@@theunbiasedopinion9132 Its not about liking fire emblem. Smash bros is not just for you its a celebration of games. Removing all the fighters aside from one from a very popular series and also removing the oldest fighters in smash itself is just stupid. You are making completely emotional hating decisions instead of actually trying to cut the roster in any thoughtful way. Your bias is just so strong its crazy.
@@kayden2119 I agree it's a celebration of games, that's why I prioritized keeping as many franchises as possible instead of cutting them for more fire emblem characters. I would rather keep Little Mac/Ness/Mr Game & Watch over Marth or any other FE character. Fire Emblem is not a popular franchise, at least compared to the Nintendo heavy hitters. It doesn't need so many characters like Mario, Zelda or Pokémon.