Wow, I've been reading so much on this and your video put everything together and explained it all the best way so far. Thank you for taking the time to make this video 😁
PATTYFINN H : HOPING YOU CAN RESPOND TO YOUR REPLY ; Have just now read your review of the KAPLINBARREVIEW OF OCT. 10 2014;.. NOW JAN. 18/2021 . YOU OBVIOUSLY KNOW WHAT YOUR ADDRESSING AND DEALING WITH IN THAT VIDEO. PRESUMING YOU TO BE AN ATTORNEY OR NOT .. I WOULD GRATEFUL IF I COULD CALL AND SPEAK WITH YOU ABOUT THAT VERY MATTER; PAYMENT IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR THOUGHTS AND/OR OPINIONS. DETAILS IN MY COMMENT TO THAT VIDEO.SENT TODAY AND SOMEWHAT URGENT. TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. MY NAME IS JOHN IN YOUNGSTOWN OHIO, WITH A PA. PH # OF 717-855-0446 . KIND REGARDS AND MANY THANKS. J.J.
This is great knowing the process. Once an MSJ is submitted by the plaintiff, and the defendant raises a good point of a likely triable issues like the video showing the light green. At what point is the plaintiff given another chance to provide additional evidence to substantiate her claim made in the MSJ that their are no triable issues? I thought once the defendant's video showed the light was green, that alone defeats her MSJ and the the case simply moves to trial. I dont understand at what point the plaintiff gets to turn in additional evidence after the MSJ has been submitted. Im confused.
Hey guy whats the purose of a motion to remitt after a jurys monetary verdict claim the limit of auto insurance is only 20k can the judge reduce the verdict on the defenses hearsay at the last minute with the plantiff contesting this insurance limit of coverages?
If plaintiff or non movant party does NOT produce an affidavit let's say plaintiff's own affidavit, will defendants msj be granted? Can plaintiff argue that this is a he said she said case and only a trier of fact can weigh the testimony against each other?
I think that if you are suing law enforcement you have to prove your allegations beyond a reasonable doubt to survive summary judgment. This is critical if you're suing the Federal Government as well as its LEOs that harmed you.
I am sueing a u it’s states Marshall in his individual compactity and he filed for summary judgement I have the photos videos and staff witness statements in my favor will I win
"I've been a Chlamydia patient for 9 years 7 months now and am still being denied proper services so that I perpetually return. If ever I get legal representation for my horrific stockpile of evidence, obviously a Motion for Summary Judgement is something I hope to be able to use to bypass exploitation of the pretenses that've been used to deny me services..."
Here's my situation. The plaintiff has made several small-part truth-based claims that we both agree with. I as the defendant have in turn produced a huge amount of counter-evidence showing that his claims are at best half-truths that rely on a huge amount of incorrectly implied context and conveniently ignored the greater reality of the situation. He wants a summary judgment made on the small half-truths that we both agree on while having all the greater evidence that refutes what he is implying with his limited evidence. It's something like this. His claim says that he followed me going 80 MPH and then pulled me over in a residential 25 MPH zone and a kid had run out in front of me on top of it. We both agree that all three events did happen which in that context says I did something very wrong. The greater reality is that he was following me on the interstate in an 80 MPH zone and that I then took an off-ramp into a residential area with a 25 MPH zone where he then pulled me over for a burned-out brake light he observed as I was taking the off-ramp from the interstate into the residential zone and some kid crossed the street half a block ahead of me while I was parked and he was giving me a warning. In his claim, I am at a jailable level guilty and could have killed a kid had he not pulled me over. In my full and complete account with documentation it's a trivial issue that didn't even warrant a ticket and the kid had nothing to do with any of the events. Does the judge side with him because we both agree on his points that I was going 80 MPH, I did get pulled over in a 25 MPH residential zone and a kid crossed the street in front of me, or does he side with me because my evidence shows something far different took place and I can prove he is lying by omission?
Witness testimony is an opinion, affidavit of truth is fact, if judge does not want to accept fact or law in court, it is contempt of a court. People simply get your affidavits in line and do not listen to this clown. When you hire a lawyer (lie-er), you show judge that you can not handle your own affairs and are a minor. You are not your name either, if you know what I mean.
With all due respect, I believe summary judgment is granted as a matter of law. Your video references questions of fact, something I was taught were questions for the jury at trial. I'm a bit confused.
Great information! Thank goodness for attorneys who don’t mind sharing knowledge and experience for us pro se and new attorneys 🙏🏾
Love the simplicity of his example.
Wow, I've been reading so much on this and your video put everything together and explained it all the best way so far. Thank you for taking the time to make this video 😁
PATTYFINN H : HOPING YOU CAN RESPOND TO YOUR REPLY ; Have just now read your review of the KAPLINBARREVIEW OF OCT. 10 2014;.. NOW JAN. 18/2021 . YOU OBVIOUSLY KNOW WHAT YOUR ADDRESSING AND DEALING WITH IN THAT VIDEO. PRESUMING YOU TO BE AN ATTORNEY OR NOT .. I WOULD GRATEFUL IF I COULD CALL AND SPEAK WITH YOU
ABOUT THAT VERY MATTER; PAYMENT IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR THOUGHTS AND/OR OPINIONS. DETAILS IN MY COMMENT TO THAT VIDEO.SENT TODAY AND SOMEWHAT URGENT. TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. MY NAME IS JOHN IN YOUNGSTOWN OHIO, WITH A PA. PH # OF 717-855-0446 . KIND REGARDS AND MANY THANKS. J.J.
This was a great great great demonstrating perspective.
Defendant: "Your honor, I'd like to cross examine the affidavit."
Judge: (snickers under his breath) "Case dismissed "
Good video
This is great knowing the process. Once an MSJ is submitted by the plaintiff, and the defendant raises a good point of a likely triable issues like the video showing the light green. At what point is the plaintiff given another chance to provide additional evidence to substantiate her claim made in the MSJ that their are no triable issues? I thought once the defendant's video showed the light was green, that alone defeats her MSJ and the the case simply moves to trial. I dont understand at what point the plaintiff gets to turn in additional evidence after the MSJ has been submitted. Im confused.
good video thanks buddy
I'm going to rewatch this.
wow---this guy is good! Thank you!
We're here for you! So glad you found this video helpful.
Hey guy whats the purose of a motion to remitt after a jurys monetary verdict claim the limit of auto insurance is only 20k can the judge reduce the verdict on the defenses hearsay at the last minute with the plantiff contesting this insurance limit of coverages?
I wish I was your student.
Ana Macio why?
If plaintiff or non movant party does NOT produce an affidavit let's say plaintiff's own affidavit, will defendants msj be granted? Can plaintiff argue that this is a he said she said case and only a trier of fact can weigh the testimony against each other?
I think that if you are suing law enforcement you have to prove your allegations beyond a reasonable doubt to survive summary judgment. This is critical if you're suing the Federal Government as well as its LEOs that harmed you.
I am sueing a u it’s states Marshall in his individual compactity and he filed for summary judgement I have the photos videos and staff witness statements in my favor will I win
"I've been a Chlamydia patient for 9 years 7 months now and am still being denied proper services so that I perpetually return. If ever I get legal representation for my horrific stockpile of evidence, obviously a Motion for Summary Judgement is something I hope to be able to use to bypass exploitation of the pretenses that've been used to deny me services..."
Here's my situation. The plaintiff has made several small-part truth-based claims that we both agree with. I as the defendant have in turn produced a huge amount of counter-evidence showing that his claims are at best half-truths that rely on a huge amount of incorrectly implied context and conveniently ignored the greater reality of the situation.
He wants a summary judgment made on the small half-truths that we both agree on while having all the greater evidence that refutes what he is implying with his limited evidence.
It's something like this. His claim says that he followed me going 80 MPH and then pulled me over in a residential 25 MPH zone and a kid had run out in front of me on top of it. We both agree that all three events did happen which in that context says I did something very wrong.
The greater reality is that he was following me on the interstate in an 80 MPH zone and that I then took an off-ramp into a residential area with a 25 MPH zone where he then pulled me over for a burned-out brake light he observed as I was taking the off-ramp from the interstate into the residential zone and some kid crossed the street half a block ahead of me while I was parked and he was giving me a warning.
In his claim, I am at a jailable level guilty and could have killed a kid had he not pulled me over. In my full and complete account with documentation it's a trivial issue that didn't even warrant a ticket and the kid had nothing to do with any of the events.
Does the judge side with him because we both agree on his points that I was going 80 MPH, I did get pulled over in a 25 MPH residential zone and a kid crossed the street in front of me, or does he side with me because my evidence shows something far different took place and I can prove he is lying by omission?
Very informative
Witness testimony is an opinion, affidavit of truth is fact, if judge does not want to accept fact or law in court, it is contempt of a court. People simply get your affidavits in line and do not listen to this clown. When you hire a lawyer (lie-er), you show judge that you can not handle your own affairs and are a minor. You are not your name either, if you know what I mean.
Plz teach like classroom with marker
good but I lack the vocabulary so maybe another time.....
Can the Summary Judgment GOES against the defendant ?
It can but it usually goes against the plaintiff
With all due respect, I believe summary judgment is granted as a matter of law. Your video references questions of fact, something I was taught were questions for the jury at trial. I'm a bit confused.
Love the mason symbols. These people just don’t see their fate do they