Evidence Law: The Rule of Relevance and Admissibility of Character Evidence

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 04. 2020
  • Visit us at lawshelf.com to earn college credit for only $20 a credit! We now offer multi-packs, which allow you to purchase 5 exams for the price of 3, or 10 exams for the price of 5, and are thus the most efficient and affordable way to earn college credit with LawShelf courses. LawShelf courses have been evaluated and recommended for college credit by the National College Credit Recommendation Service (NCCRS), and may be transferred to over 1,500 colleges and universities. We also have established a growing list of partner colleges that guarantee LawShelf credit transfers, including Excelsior University, Thomas Edison State University, University of Maryland Global Campus, Purdue University Global, Touro University Worldwide, and many more!
    Subscribe for weekly legal videos and visit us at lawshelf.com for more LawShelf resources! LawShelf is a project of National Paralegal College nationalparalegal.edu.

Komentáře • 23

  • @tawdryhepburn4686
    @tawdryhepburn4686 Před 2 lety +14

    This is superb. So clear and informative. Really cuts to the core of the issue and makes it easy to remember.

  • @hyojinlee
    @hyojinlee Před 3 lety +5

    This is great, thank you so much! :)

  • @chasingamurderer
    @chasingamurderer Před 3 lety +2

    Thank you.

  • @WE-qk8sd
    @WE-qk8sd Před 3 lety +1

    Thank you!

  • @satyadwivedi9600
    @satyadwivedi9600 Před 3 lety +3

    Thank 😀u sir ji

  • @RebuiltBurrito2
    @RebuiltBurrito2 Před 3 lety +8

    Great job! These videos are awesome. Your animation is fun and helpful to understanding the concepts :)

  • @familyloyalty43
    @familyloyalty43 Před 2 lety +1

    It has to be substantial and relevant with actual evidence

  • @godschaffeur7844
    @godschaffeur7844 Před 2 lety

    For which type of law/jurisdiction is this video referring to please?

    • @LawShelf
      @LawShelf  Před 2 lety +1

      The Federal Rules of Evidence, but the rules are comparable in all states, with minor differences.

    • @godschaffeur7844
      @godschaffeur7844 Před 2 lety +1

      @@LawShelf thank you very much

  • @margaretteespinosa7414

    done

  • @marilynmonhoe561
    @marilynmonhoe561 Před rokem

    If someone whose charged for murder say that they would never harm someone when they're being questioned would that be considered "opening the door" for their assault charges that were previously inadmissible?

    • @user-be2hk9ii8n
      @user-be2hk9ii8n Před rokem

      I've been waiting for someone to answer your question for like ten days.😕

    • @LawShelf
      @LawShelf  Před rokem

      That's a judgment call up to the judge based on the specific facts and exactly what was said, but I'd say there's definitely a good chance that could open the door, yes.

  • @UnknownUnknown-zj3pz
    @UnknownUnknown-zj3pz Před 2 lety

    what are the rule(s) re applied, if you care to at least provide one.

  • @vegas9440
    @vegas9440 Před 2 lety

    How will the jury know the law?

    • @LawShelf
      @LawShelf  Před 2 lety +1

      When it comes to evidence, the judge makes the decision before it goes to the jury. If it got to the jury already, the judge would instruct the jury on whether and to what extent they should consider it.

    • @elitenemysis6633
      @elitenemysis6633 Před rokem

      @@LawShelfIf I illegally obtained perfect proof / strong evidence of a crime, like a bloody machete in the back of a car, how, if I am a juror just supposed to dismiss it, if it is clear, relevant, and timely? Cuz a judge orders me to erase my memory of seeing it?
      Honest question.

  • @ayoebi7666
    @ayoebi7666 Před rokem

    They don’t supposed to lie too young people! it only Crate conflict in Truth.

  • @user-xp8tc2yl8j
    @user-xp8tc2yl8j Před 20 dny

    There are exceptions. And there are exceptions to the exceptions. And of course exceptions to the exceptions of the exceptions.

  • @abrahamgomez7366
    @abrahamgomez7366 Před rokem

    Lol it's substantial awright