Hi there, quick question around 17:07, can we also translate this as ∀(x)[¬Person(x) -> L(x,f)] this is like saying "Everyone who's NOT a person likes frank"? Thanks
can anyone help me, I am doing my journal article. I have a verb data which the verb doesn't have subject as the language also doesn't have pleonastic subject. In other word, the subject is non-overt. What logic form it will be? Meanwhile the data can be add on with adverb, is adverb symbolize another logic variable? The data I am talking about is 'hujan hari ini' or 'it is raining today' hujan in Malay Language doesn't have subject as the 'hari ini or today' is an adverb hmm...
You’d have to establish that x=y to force them to be the same or NOT(x=y) to force them to be different. They *can* be the same but they can also be different
![LING 324 [6-3] Translations in Predicate Logic](/img/n.gif)
Thanks!
Hi there, quick question around 17:07, can we also translate this as ∀(x)[¬Person(x) -> L(x,f)] this is like saying "Everyone who's NOT a person likes frank"? Thanks
can anyone help me, I am doing my journal article. I have a verb data which the verb doesn't have subject as the language also doesn't have pleonastic subject. In other word, the subject is non-overt. What logic form it will be? Meanwhile the data can be add on with adverb, is adverb symbolize another logic variable?
The data I am talking about is 'hujan hari ini' or 'it is raining today'
hujan in Malay Language doesn't have subject as the 'hari ini or today' is an adverb hmm...
What about x and y in such open formulas as Px and Py? Are they equal? Because I don't understand can we say that x overlaps y, and vice versa? Thanks
You’d have to establish that x=y to force them to be the same or NOT(x=y) to force them to be different. They *can* be the same but they can also be different
@@Trevtutor I see, I am very grateful to your explanation! Thanks!