What CONSIPRACY Would DESTROY The WORLD If Proven TRUE?
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
- Welcome to Rufus Read It. We work extremely hard to make the best quality content for you. Each video takes a ton of effort time and energy to complete. It's a true labour of love but you all make it worth it. All the content in these videos are owned by us!
Our Work Process:
1. Ideation + Scripting: We research and come up with the best ideas to turn into videos, we write the scripts and refine our commentary.
2. Voice Recording: All our videos are recorded by a real human. No Ai Voice recording.
3. Gameplay: Every minute of captivating gameplay you see on the channel 100% recorded by us.
4. Audio Editing: Each video is audio engineered. We edit the pacing, flow and add audio effects to elevate viewer the experience.
5. Editing: We bring everything together here. We generate captions, sound effects and color correct to make each video unique.
6. Quality Control: Each video is meticulously fine tuned so that it holds up to our highest quality standards. If the video is not up to par we go back to the drawing board and make sure it is.
Thanks for watching :)
- Rufus
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
Imagine if all of these came true at the same time?
All the religious nuts will swear Jesus is coming back the next day
That first one ... deep
The homie talking about Montana as if it was Roswell in the 60’s
There is one famous UFO sighting in Great Falls, Montana, though it was in 1950.
Also, Roswell was 1947.
Well to be fair, Montana has a population density of 3, so if aliens were going to test the waters, that's not a bad place to start
Story 9 about the Vietnam POWs is word for word taken from the book Inside Delta Force by Eric Haney. It's a good read.
Okay but the princess Diana one actually makes a lot of sense
What about the one about the overwhelming amount of people on state aid having kids with reckless abandon. Sorry kids, set ya up for disaster.
State aid is usually so low that no kid will ever bring in enough to be supported, and those that are not so have other systems in place to ensure that the need for that aid is minimized. The onus is still on the people having them to provide the lion's share, so despite the constant fearmongering over it, these people are never going to have an overwhelming number of kids - or more accurately, enough to overwhelm the state aid system for supporting said kids, let alone the entire government budget (no, that honor goes to one of two things, though often both at the same time: military overspending, and business kickbacks). Even when you add up all of the expenses state aid goes out for, child support, far more often than not, is nothing more than a drop in the bucket, and abusers are always a drop in the bucket of a system, at least in terms of the numbers of the actual people doing the abusing. Could this kind of abusers empty state aid of funds? Possibly, but that has yet to happen, even in the most crooked of state aids; no, the abusers that do empty it are the ones who run the state aid, embezzling its funds for themselves. Yeah, pretty big difference there.
It is no different to farming subsidies. Yes, theoretically, they are supposed to go to families that own and operate farms, and yes, any number of these families could somehow abuse it. However, every time, the actual majority of the recipients and abusers are agricultural corporations. That said, the key difference between a corporation and a family is that, despite whatever a corporation may say in their efforts to describe themselves as a "families," families do not enlist thousands upon thousands of people in a country or even all over the world. The difference lies in scale, and the only person who could be said to have built a family large enough to effectively be a corporation is Ghengis Khan (seriously, 1 in every 200 people _in the world_ can trace their lineage to him - feel free to imagine _that_ as a corporation).
Can kids be the straw that breaks the camel's back? Yes, but only to the families that are having them. Governments, whether or not they give aid, let alone enough to do the job of properly raising them, are systems and face no threat of being brought down by the weight of children. No, the only way children can bring down any government is indirectly, namely when all of the parents have truly had enough with the BS from the government and thus, against all odds, band together to change it (specific changes be damned). Otherwise, no, it will never happen.
@@DavidRichardson153 Gotta say.. incredibly well put. It's true there's currently far larger wastes of resources, the fact that contributing vs. receiving is largely based on choice remains.
story 7: in the official photos, the fuel tank is pretty much intact compared to just behind it.
The self proclaimed air craft expert may be right on his issues he presented for why it is unlikely the official cause but he made some pretty bold claims that shows he is not a missile expert. While yes some missiles do explode in the proximity and use shrapnel to cause damage that is not the norm when it comes to anti-aircraft/air defense, a large majority of them (specifically ground to air) do not carry war heads and rely 100% on ballistic damage to take down the threat, that is why they fire multiple projectiles at their target. They are far cheaper, more effective, efficient and safer to lob multiple non explosive rounds at a target for a direct hit than to shoot 1 or 2 that could completely miss and hit the ground and kill unintentional targets when they explode on the ground. Not to mention we have the technology to be accurate enough for direct hits with enough speed to destroy a target without explosive material mid air so why waste the resources.
I'm not an aircraft expert nor a missile expert but I was thinking the same thing
Flat Earthers probably. I mean at that point you've pretty much proven a fundemental reality as false. I'd probably snap like them and go into full denial mode.
Story 3 isn't conspiracy theory as much as the truth
The talk about how bad market economies is just willfully ignorant.
Market economies aren't perfect, but command economics have performed worse in every conceivable way in the 20th century. To the point that in the 90s, Chinese and Soviet upper middle class were well below American and Western European poverty standards. Gorbachev cried after stopping at a random Safeway in Houston.
Poverty elimination programs don't work, and from all measurements I've ever seen make the problem worse and endemic. The war on poverty has been a catastrophic defeat.
Almost everything the government sets out to solve is guaranteed to fail. Its more than just mere incompetence, every program has been used to syphon and funnel money away to become it's own industry, and the results used to measure success or the continued need for the l program are anecdotal, not statistical, as if they know and are proud to not have to produce results.
tf is a consipracy
I think knowledge of aliens would destroy religion
Nah, it'd more likely rebirth it instead.
Please God let this happen
VERY much the opposite
There are actually religions that believe aliens do exist. I think Islam or Christianity is one of them .