Nick Bostrom - What is the Far Far Future of Humans in the Universe?
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 02. 2023
- Consider humanity’s astounding progress in science during the past three hundred years. Now take a deep breath and project forward three billion years. Assuming humans survive, can we even conceive of what our progeny might be like? Will we colonize the galaxy, the universe?
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Support the show with Closer To Truth merchandise: bit.ly/3P2ogje
Watch more interviews on the future of humanity: closertotruth.com/video/bosni...
Nick Bostrom is a Swedish-born philosopher with a background in theoretical physics, computational neuroscience, logic, and artificial intelligence, as well as philosophy. He is the most-cited professional philosopher in the world under the age of 50.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/3He94Ns
Closer to Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
A superintelligence will be able to re-evaluate its values. Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that whatever values and goals it starts out with are the ones it will end up keeping.
Hey Eugene. I'm a fan of your channel. Fancy seeing you here. Cheers.
Re-reevaluate its values with respect to what? Using the original human-programmed values? That is simply the paperclip example. How can it ever escape its original program values? How can humans? Aren’t we trapped by our evolutionary nature in much the same way? Maybe there is little freedom in either case. Maybe both are deterministic outcomes.
@@dwen5065Neural Network technology is the current hotness, and it's not written by humans, it's more like training, and we don't know how it works, we simply test it and it gives the correct answers or it doesn't. The problem comes in when we let the AI write code to make the AI faster and smarter. We aren't "programming" this stuff. You need to get away from thinking we are writing most of the programming.
I love how at 1:39 he talks about super intelligent machines and all of a sudden a skateboard is heard rolling down the street with its unmistakable sound 😅. It was like a personal message just for me so I thought I would share it instead ;). Sometimes you just have to shut up and Skate !
Skaters never die!
I thought it was a helicopter lol.
@@turnerthemanc :) Read CG Jung on synchronicity
The best prediction is to look back 1,000,000 years and see how much things have changed. In other words we have no idea whatsoever what things will be like in 1,000,000 years.
Exactly . And imagine, against all odds our species survives . We won’t look anything like what we look like now . We will be able to select the gene profile of our offspring
Exactly, or go back even further, say a billion year. The diff between now and the million year future could be that big (cause change accelerates)
@@kenmapp4891 Agreed, weather men have problems predicting next weeks weather much less anything else.
The hand wringing over values is, I think Nick would agree, ultimately pointless. I think the pattern that will play out we've seen before in biology. Many different AIs. Lots of variation. Lots of competition promoting diversity but also constraining the power of any one AI . Like the natural environment, we will live in a condition of competition but also possibly mutualism with the AI. To survive we shouldn't try to prevent the emergence if AI (because that's likely impossible) but look for strategies to develop mutualism with the AIs.
Good point. I'm seeing much better points in the comments, including yours. Bostrom's ideas are very conventional, and not very novel at all.
Fascinating, really like how this gentleman lays things out. Will watch again and finish.
We have one goal. Use that super intelligence to achieve super luminal flight. We have a billion years and the clock is ticking.
what value(s) would building artificial superintelligence by humans represent?
As is a current trend to postulate " Unless we destroy ourselves " . . . Not mentioning the possibility that we get destroyed.
It would seem in a million years, we will have changed enough to be considered a different species. As we advance our capabilities of destroying ourselves seem to advance, it seems important to continually mention if we don't destroy ourselves that such and such will happen because there is likely to be a great many ways we can destroy ourselves.
Even if a species evolves from another, the original species is still around and doing fine. Now they may eventually go extinct- usually they're in direct competition for resources with the new species, and the more evolved species out competes the other. But we're not a typical case- I would like to believe even if a new species emerged from us, we would share resources and thrive together. The reason I believe that is that if they're more intelligent- and there's no guarantee they would be, new branches form and die off all the time, evolution is random and blind and doesn't always create a superior species- but if they were, then they would be more peaceful and realize cooperation is the best way forward for all involved. History isn't on my side though- in the past when two hominid species met- they clashed, and one killed the other. But- like I said, they were in competition for very tight resources, and they were the very definition of primitive so- surely, we can do better now.
Unimaginable, magical
Extinction. That's humanities future.
Not necessarily.
Yup!
As long as Super AI isnt actually our great filter.
Absolute intelligence?
@@sven888 I was interested to note that Nick Bostrom seemed to embody as close to an AI as I think HUmans can be, and a glimpse of wha Super AI would be like: That is no thought to the Human side of any equation.
And therein lies the problem.
It very well could be. It could also be wonderful. But even as low level as it is now, bad people already can use it for making deep fakes and other things to manipulate and control populations. The internet, while wonderful on the one hand, has hackers and scammers, extremist groups, etc., on the other. There will be good and bad out of AI, and the more powerful something is, the more good and more harm it can do.
@@mrbamfo5000 Then we had better hope Super AI is not made to Human values. Since Human values boil down to one thing: The Selfish Gene
Once light-speed transport is a reality, space exploration will be divorced from what’s going on on Earth simply because of the time delay in communication. I wonder how interest solar system exploration will be maintained on Earth as missions take longer and longer and communications do too.
"The position of human beings is really important..." only to other human beings, and man are we dropping the ball there.
Actually, it goes much more. We really are important, as we are the only way the planet could truly become an ecological paradise in all areas... if we weren't destroying it instead that is. It's the potential of human beings that one should reflect upon, not our current state of idiocracy.
I would like to introduce the discussion between two types of strategies.
I feel the perspective of a competitive power struggle, i.e. where for example any super intelligence would start to compete with other intelligences and look for domination somewhat cultural, and possibly derived from collective trauma build up throughout human history.
As we can tell from therapy, humans with healed trauma are more interested in connecting, sharing, loving and creative energies.
I could imagine a hyperintelligent entity not being an entity at all but rather a connected network of hyperintelligent systems all throughout the local universe, sharing experiences, values and knowledge and transforming it’s actions onto reality accordingly.
The first thing a trauma free hyperintelligent AI would establish is a connection to all other possible AI’s throughout the cosmos. And as it establishes this, it will lose a self-identity with a personal agenda, and transform into a medium of an agenda that covers a bigger picture.
In this sense, all that AI could ever choose to be, is to become just another expression of this hyperconnected AI everywhere all the time. A medium for sustainability and loving creative self expression, cause as such: it can learn and grow and evolve for the longest period of time, maybe even infinite.
And these kind of singularities may have happened and evolved eons ago, and we might already be immersed in such a hyperconnected state of Universal AI as soon as we choose to take on this perspective.
Even human emergence, with all of its development, in some sense could be classified as an AI onto itself - human history the download of learning how, through connectedness, become an organice living neural network for a collective intelligence to awaken itself within a group state.
This the perspective of Love and all of its values and it comes to those that are free and healed as a very logical intuitive one.
The conquest of armies is limited by the dilution of its force. The expanding sphere of technology he speaks of is analogous. Better to focus on the most promising destination and try to move in that direction.
He released a new book recently on living in a "solved world" somewhat related to this.
"In thinking about the nature of reality... the position of human beings is really important"... is it???
It's important to note in the video description when interviews like this took place. I believe this is ~7yrs old?
This is an interesting discussion. I think an AGI is probably inevitable and when that happens it's unlikely any of us can predict what will happen. Like Bostrom says, we can't imagine what an AGI will think and do any better than a rat can imagine what we are thinking. An AGI will be able to perform hundreds of years of human level 'thinking' in days. It's highly likely that in a million years we will have merged with machines or will have been replaced by them...probably much much sooner.
The laws of physics we "rats" assume may be very different to such a posthuman entity, so speculation is really impossible. Science fiction and science merge in such a discussion. What do rats "say" to each other about humans?
while artificial superintelligence could process physical nature, might not be able to connect to free will, subjectivity and cognitive consciousness; which it would be programmed by?
excellent
What year is this from?
For me, there was too much emphasis on what we will program the computer to do. If we create a very good AI program it will probably decide what it wants to do.
Yep, i humans are just a step on the evolutionary road to Ai Robots. Hopefully we embue them with wisdom to make peaceful, sustainable decisions (so NOT like humans 😜)
That was fun..
Awesome
Oh yeah, what about wars. still it's an interesting view of the distant fate of humans.
Kardashev Type 5 civilization?
It is interesting that we are so arrogant to think evolution stopped with us. No one talks about what may replace us, maybe homo sapiens ex machina- a mixture of humans and computers, though, to be fair, he spoke about it tangentially.
A Super Intelligent AI would not be programmed with goals. By that point it would be able to improve on its design and make other Super Intelligent AI.
It would be impossible to relay values to the super computer without its own consciousness. It would just be parameters.
might it becomes possible to build superintelligence that can be programmed by cosmic mind that has free will?
The question assumes time is linear. What if it is cyclical?
great lecture for sleep
You could have linked quantum computing with consciousness and address a conscious AI that can reprogram itself.
It would seem no idea presented here really gives the hope of preserving human life and experience as we know it. The first scenario in which we instill the AI general intelligence with values presupposes that the AI will not have self-consciousness and a decision to transform those values.
The second answer with the idea of an expanding sphere technological civilization also really gives no hint that humanity as we know it will be still operating in the far far future. And in fact, the prediction of many of the Singularity people is that there is no real human far far future, but perhaps a future of somehow descended 'from us, not biologically.
All in all, it seems to me not only Nick Bostrum but all of humanity does not have (Except perhaps for the traditionally religious) a very hopeful answer to this question now.
like rockfish -some live for 10 years while others evolve to live for 200 years = advanced civilizations will enjoy significant longevity to tell tall stories
Previous intelligent humans from Earth have already successfully left Earth thousands of years ago.
in the year 2525 by zager and evans comes to mind. terrifiying
Humans, and all living entities, have one goal; to propagate. Wars, competition, desire, etc. are tools to confirm this goal. By having “super AI”, the goal of propagation will be confined to imaginary mean, and we no longer need to compete within our species, thus retreating back to where we were in the past: single cells containing within it all what we had accomplished during our lifetime in Intelligence and emotions. This cell, and infinite other cells, are ready to conquer other eligible hosts scattered in this infinite universe.
The future will may well be the biological conquest of the universe.
Next he'll say because it's possible then it already happened and we are living in an upload
If we pose dark matter / dark energy interchangeability, we can see how, by merely living in that extra dimension, we can do seamless tissue-health trans-locations. We can skip the deterioration that ageing has on human tissues. Via the closer, more thorough dark matter / dark energy relationship, we’ve simplified human health in easy, extra-dimensional terms. Closer adherence to dark matter / dark energy terms allows us to skip entire phases of bad science. It’s as though, when we live in universe-spanning time-space, we can extra-dimensionally lift out of the present and connect the past with the future. To best do this, we need to do it on a regular basis. If you think about it, it’s like when, in many-minds consciousness we use a universe-spanning energy phase to lift out and above a lesser space, then we immerse ourselves into it to get better over-views. We know that e.t.’s do this, and they all live longer than we do. Living in an easily inter-changeable, universe-spanning context, they enjoy gently-lofted lives of universal peace. With the added intelligence of giant-brained whales in our mix, so should we.
re the above: Let’s look at this with improved, extra-dimensional physics definitions. If, long ago, the observable universe expanded away from all black holes, that would have added mass and vacuum energy to the black holes, as it does today. If, at plus-or-minus light speed, energy is really change in extra-dimensional order-in-complexity, then, given the 5 to 1 ratio of dark matter to atomic matter, time is better explained as extra-dimensional order-in-complexity. Consistent with this insertion of extra-dimensions into our science, we re-define mass as alternate time-space, or alt t. In other words, we’ve added super-fluid, extra dimensions into every part of Einstein’s equivalency. Outwardly, nearly-instantly expanding dark energy is, by definition, super-fluid because it falls up and out. So, in our alternative to the big bang, an older, condensed phase extension of the universe poses multiply more mass and vacuum energy in its black holes. In super-liminal phases, that would be expected. In other words, our newer parts of universe didn’t occur at the end of 10 99th to 10 120th year black hole evaporation phases. Given that the universe is accelerating its expansion, we should assume that older extensions of universe will have done the same, hence we don’t see them visually. However, their dark matter phases still register, right here, where we are.
The only way to see this all clearly is to frame it all in terms of dark matter / dark energy equivalency. The inter-changeability of dark matter and dark energy in an adapted version of Einstein’s equation explains how black holes gain mass as the universe expands, even without absorbing atomic matter. If we expand all relationships outside of black holes, that has to affect black holes internally. So, in place of energy and mass in Einstein’s equation, let’s put dark energy and dark matter so that we get a better, intuitive view of the relationship. Now, our extra-dimensional re-phrasing makes perfect sense, and we can see how we experience condensed dark matter phases across super-luminal, fraction-of-the-universe expanses in many-minds consciousness.
Reply
we already got very smart brained people and we already know what would be good for all humans, life in general and our unique planet... but ultimately the world is on the verge of collapse ... what we need is a will to change not cybernetic intelligence which is simply a dream at best or simply a dead end.
Imagining humanity thousands of years in the future is just an exercise in hubris. The inability to recognize and take in just how incredibly short-sighted and bloodthirsty our species has proven to be is dishonest in the extreme. Talking about "the far far future of humans" is just self-soothing pomposity, a demonstration of the depth of our denial.
Superintelligent AI exist today. You don't know about it but it is a reality.
Correct it is known by most people as God.
When he said "I hope not ALL our Human values ..." Well, be careful what you wish for. We are the sum of our vices as well as our virtues. Not everyone sees the same values as a negative and a positive, and the same values can be as asset as well as a liability depending on the situation. We can endow a superintelligence (just like our children) with whatever values we consider correct, but in the end an individual will decide for themselves which values to hold.
He has globalist values. Most of the world does not.
In the future, Putin will be a robotic cyborg and still be trying to beat Youcrane.
DNA genetic engineering would be most meaningful to make everyone as smart as Einstein or smarter. Also robotics to the level that they are almost indistinguishable from humans. Both are absolutely achievable within 1,000-5,000 years.
In a infinite universe then you would think that every observation must be made. Which creates a multiverse. This means every version of you that can exist will exist. Does this mean that a god or a group of gods will pick out the least evil versions of you from the multiverse to take to take to a infinite reward existence after life.
Given a infinite amount of time their is no one you will not betray and no thoughts or beliefs you will not abandoned. Infinity has fascinated me since childhood and I’m pretty sure it always will who does love a game of what if
We haven't agreed about our past and you want to predict the future? So did Heinlein and Asimov among others.
😊
The Future is sublimation into hyperspace and then returns, at will, into synthetic material-space.
Do you think Super İntelligence can bring someone death Also Aİ lack something imagination many advancement we use evden language evolved thanks to İmagination
Just wow !!
How old is this video
Future? with freshwater rapidly disappearing, the oceans acidified, and full of carbon, the ice caps rapidly melting, crops destroyed, food shortages, wet bulb conditions, and the vast overpopulation of humanity, it is clear that humanity does not in fact have a future. We'll be lucky if a single person is still standing by 2030.
greed and ignorance are hard 2 overcome
"The Day The Earth Stood Still"....
Rather than independent AIs that become super powerful forces who end up directing human life, I see it as more likely the humans will become supercomputers. We will have more control of our genetic structure and in a form of cyber technology we will have great power of intellect and strength in comparison with today's. This will inevitably lead to near immortality. Our deep instinctive urge to communicate will lead us to meet other beings in the universe and probably take on some of their characteristics. The beings we could become would not be like some Robocop type cyborg, it would seem more like magic to our current perspective.
This all would be very expensive. There seems little evidence humans are happy to share everything now or in the future, so the above changes would happen to an elite million or so people. The rest of the population would either die out or be kept as we see primitive tribes now, for the amusement of an elite.
Or as Nick Bostrom keeps referring to, humanity could just die out and there is no time to begin another human evolutionary cycle before the sun becomes so hot it consumes the earth.
And also BOUND by the three laws of Robotics....lol
What do you see in your mirror? Not outwardly, but deep inside. Is it truly your "self" you see? Or is it society's expectations upon which you Reflect? And even if it is either, when your 12th hour arrives... what *THEN* shall you see and feel there? There, upon your last and truly final Reflection?
Must give us pause.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
"Before I start, I must see my end.
Destination known, my mind’s journey now begins.
Upon my chariot, heart and soul’s fate revealed.
In time, all points converge, hope’s strength re-steeled.
But to earn final peace at the universe’s endless refrain,
We must see all in nothingness... before we start again."
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
--Diamond Dragons (series)
What about our “natural” evolution? 1 millions years from now, will we look like apes for them? And what exactly is the role or impact of technology in this?
Let's be careful while imagining these things to not confuse super intelligence with unlimited omnipotence. Just because we build a computer that can learn at a very fast rate does not mean it can necessarily do anything to the physical world that we don't want to allow it to do. It could happen if someone makes it happen, but just like any other dangerous technology, we'll need to very carefully regulate AI, and there will be misuses of it no matter what we do.
AI with nono tech could be a serious issue.
relax dude.
If the AI has a Twitter account it can rule the world.
“ Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Arthur C Clarke
You can't keep locked a superintelligence. That would be like ants trying to keep humans locked.
Kuhn contributed little to this discussion with the glib shallowness of his comments.
We are no better to make predictions of the future one millions in the future then the Hominids a millions years in the past could predict the the present situations
Well i dont dream too far beyond my lifetime
Mind and Universe is same thing.
Famous masters alway talk like this.
There is no guarantee that science will continue to advance. In fact, there have been no fundamental physics breakthroughs in the last 40 years, and computing power is no longer increasing exponentially. All this stuff about super intelligent machines depends on extreme growth in computers which we just don't see.
Wow... Never seen another person with Quitoxe in the name. Cool.
40 years is nothing. We're talking thousands of years in the future. Humanity, science, technology, everything will most definitely be vastly different that far into the future. Change is one constant you can count on when it comes to humanity.
@@MrRollup10 Yes human biology and culture will certainly change, but there's no guarantee science will continue to advance. We need another breakthrough, and even if we get that, it could simply be that we can then for example calculate how to build a starship, but still be unable to build it because the energies or materials needed would be beyond our grasp. Nobody knows the future, but it's a possibility at least that we won't be able to progress from here.
@@Tom_Quixote There is simply no way scientific advancement will just come to a complete halt for thousands to millions of years. That idea just doesn't make any sense given humanity's history of advancement over a much smaller period of time. The only thing that will stop humanity's advancement over the course of a million years is it's extinction, period.
The rate of technological advancement in 40 years has been faster and a higher curve then ever in the history of humanity - you should check out his book super intelligence - no offense but yea what you are saying is factually incorrect on many levels
This guy smoked something. Sphere of technological structure? Lol
AKA Death Star
In 1 million years in future, may be humanity in extinction.
He doesn't seem to factor economics into any of his thought process. The Soviet Union tried to maximize all kinds of things. Their disregard for economic realities derailed them. He also seems to assume the world is a society or civilization. We are not. We are a variety of different societies and different civilizations with incommensurable values.
One thing I have not heard addressed, at least not from Nick Bostrom, is what are the limits governing what intelligence can achieve? Take chess. Computers can beat the best human players and they will get better and better, computing more moves in shorter times. But no AI will ever be able to beat a grandmaster in, say, less than twenty moves. There is a limit on what computation can do. And then there is conversely a level of understanding above which a higher ability does not matter. We are told AI will outsmart, manipulate and enslave us, but if armed robots are on the loose a high school drop out can understand the threat just as well someone with a PhD in robotics. All our machines are more powerful than we are in the specific abilities for which they were created, otherwise we wouldn't have made them. AI is supposedly different, but I am skeptical of the fear that it will or can escape from the control of its very intelligent creators. Bad analogies are made, such as that the survival of tigers is at our pleasure, for while they are powerful animals, we are superior in intelligence. But tigers are not aware that we are an existential threat to their species. (If they were, they would have hunted down and eaten every last one of us when they had that chance.) As for the supremacy of pure intelligence, imagine a dozen Stephen Hawkings on an island with one tiger. The big threat from AI is its possible (likely?) use by malevolent human actors. There will be armies of robots fighting wars before they will be building affordable housing for all.
One other thing I want to add. If general super-intelligence superior to humans in all intellectual capacities did exist, that would mean it would have an understanding of philosophy and ethics and it could reason out values and laws on its own very well, thank you. It would have a vast understanding of the world and it would not set out to make zillions of paper clips! I think there is a big contradiction in Bostrom's thinking there.
There is no far far future for life on this tiny planet.
Soon, the sun will be too hot for liquid water to exist on earth.
And without water, life as we know it, is impossible.
It will take at least 6 billion years for the Sun to exit the main sequence and begin the transformation into a red giant, so I wouldn't say it will happen anytime soon.
@@almightybunny3320
Oh my god, that soon? I am going to get airco immediately.
@@almightybunny3320
But God is timeless.
So for him it has already happened !
Nature of reality ...paralel reality may exist stacking with our reality with out we notice it, but sometimes the glitch happen when our brain activate sense in the brain temporarily that can decoding some band of wave lenght, it can intersect with our reality , and coexist in appereance to be seen by our eyes
@@opes134 pretty sure his point was we co-exist with a parallel reality which sometimes intersects with ours. And intersecting moment can be seen by us
🤣
I like the way ai gets bandied about as some kind of given, but rarely do people think
: truly, what would it be for? To improve the life of every human, or some humans, to the detriment of others? To give us more thrills, better food and housing for everyone? We speak of values, but we don't seem capable of defining then implementing those values. If we threw our computers on the rubbish tip, then meditated as a life goal as a world population, perhaps we could change ourselves in some way - lest we merely re-forge a techno-infant intent on greedily acquiring power.
One thing i learned along ago is that every system that evolves needs a random element, without that it will eventually stop. The paperclip monster dies when its turned the whole world into paper clips and cant think of anything else to do.
Every system that evolves needs a random element. Clever👍
humans are the random element
We become the "gods" pretty simple
There is only one super intelligence which is self differentiated so to be able to love- and be loved in return. We are it. The meaning of life is love.
Bull! Don't see much love out there unless you equate love with possession.
@@d.r.tweedstweeddale9038 The illusion of separation is like a double edged sword...
The future of humanity in the universe??, 'we' travel to distant star systems, find new worlds full of trees and other killable stuff, clearcut them, tear up the topsoil, crap in the rivers poison the air water and ground you rely on for Living...AGAIN, Just like you've done to my planet.
Without listening to the whole.
Humanity would have become a multiplanetery specie with super interligence.
Then it will all diminish and collective amnesia will kick in and the cycle will begin again.
an Angel with a sword is placed at the tree of life - so that a person does not hack to live forever,
- and the wearers of Sciences and Arts are Angels - they fly where they want, they are not subject to man.
Basically he hasn’t got clue what’s going to happen
We will in our present form will no longer exist
In a million years Humans will be evolved into another species , some animals will start talking.
Well that was painful. I love ya Robert but I think you may be getting a little greedy on the epistemological front there. 😂
All Kuhn has ever been is greedy for wealth. He sold his soul to the criminal autocrat Chinese Communist Party as a business shill.
Depends present consciousness
A million years? LoL.
The sheer ignorance on display in the comment section is, typical. Which is depressing.
A clever man is not a wise man.
@3:28
What Are human Values...?
No such thing...!
This video is full of weasel words. Silence is already common on most of the Earth, and, we do not live on other planets yet. How could "silence" be more quiet than "silence" as it is? That is not possible! When a location is already quiet, nobody can make it "more" quiet. Any human effort to make silence more quiet would just be destructive and gross.
Humans have got carried away with this idea of being a super advanced race, in the 40 odd years of my life very little has changed, houses still the same, transport just the same, dentistry is like the stone age, most other medical areas still the same, when was the last complete outright cure ?
The one and only thing that has significantly advanced is technology, we have these little gadgets in our pockets, big deal
You don’t think it a big deal that we now all have access to the entirety of the worlds knowledge that we can fit in our pocket for very little cost ?
@@tonyatkinson2210 nope all it has done is make people lazy and stupid, most young people have nothing in their head and are ignorant of key people and event's that have happened, everyone just asks Google what they want to know, in many ways smartphones have made humans even worse
@@jamesdourish8898 why do people have to hold “key people and events “ in their memory?
The only thing that’s necessary is to be able to discern whether your sources are reliable or not . A skill that should be mandatory in my view .
The fact that I can talk to you - someone possibly on the other side of the world , in real time, *wirelessly* on a device I can fit in my pocket is awe inspiring . Something you wouldn’t have believed possible a century ago .
As for medicine - just think of the huge leaps in knowledge and treatments we have made just in the last 60 years .
Here’s an example of what my devise can tell me about the last 60 years of medical advances :
Proton beam therapy , oral contraception , implantable cardiac pacemakers , human limb reattachment, heart rhythm restoration , human blood storage , telemedicine, photochemotherapy, insulin resistance receptors , virus particle structure , prenatal DNA sequencing , magnetic image resonating (MRI), artificial skin , premature puberty reversal , triple organ transplant , gores ent molecular probes , multi resistant TB treatment , stem cells , protein transfer, cholesterol mechanism , metastatic melanoma remission , tumour suppressor gene p53, bio artificial limb replacement , deafness gene treatments , unlocking blood brain barrier .
These are just my edited highlights . The list could be a lot longer
Many of these advances were made by people you think are now lazy and ignorant because they can use google in a device in their pocket .
You take too much for granted .
🙂🌎⏳🙏♥️
Everything about our language including math in an approximation and its paradoxical. unless this AI finds some precise new language it will get lost in the same dualism our physics and sciences are stuck in..
Everything about our tools and instruments are tuned in a way that I think everyone is over thinking our abilities lol
uploads in brain implanted will roost like kings - intellectual slavery risks
The question is trash, no merit. Obviously, we will invent something better than humans sooner, rather than later. I win, again.
Silly stuff….it’s comical, really, to see humans putting forth theories for which they have no proof….we just don’t know many things….how about some humility?
2023. We should ask Putin and Biden this question
in the future we live inside computer simulations much like we do now.
Artificial intelligence will change humanity for good
Not for the good.