Makita DSS611 VS Makita DHS680 18V Circular Saws

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 3. 01. 2022
  • Makita DSS611 Specifications
    Blade diameter - 165mm
    Max cutting capacities
    - at 90° - 57mm
    - at 45° - 40mm
    - at 50° - 36mm
    No load speed - 3,700rpm
    Overall dimensions - 347mm
    Net weight - 3.2kg
    Voltage - 18V
    Motor - Brushed
    LXT battery compatibility - 1.5Ah 3Ah 4Ah 5Ah 6Ah
    Makita DHS680 Specifications
    Blade diameter - 165mm
    Max cutting capacities
    - at 90° - 57mm
    - at 45° - 41mm
    No load speed - 5,000rpm
    Overall dimensions - 350mm
    Net weight - 3.3kg
    Voltage - 18V
    LXT battery compatibility - 1.5Ah 3Ah 4Ah 5Ah 6Ah
    *I have to point out that the DSS611 cut with a blade that was not new, while the DHS680 cut for the first time in these tests with a much better Efficut blade.
    Hello there, on this channel we share with you various tests and demonstrations with power tools, accessories for power tools and other types of construction tools. We hope that these video materials will help you get an idea of ​​how a certain tool you are interested in, looks in reality and behaves at work. So if you like this topic, we already consider you a subscriber!
    Contact ➜ See the "About" section of the channel
    #ToolTest #Makita
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 44

  • @shaundell4630
    @shaundell4630 Před 10 měsíci

    The one complaint I have about the brushless saw is the little lever for adjusting the base plates depth. Firstly once base plate was at maxx depth the lever would be lower and catch on material and now the circlip has popped off!

  • @reefbloke
    @reefbloke Před 2 lety +22

    For total fairness you should have used identical brand new blades, you can see the chip size and amount of saw dust produced by the blade of the brushless makita is totally different

  • @Giggler.
    @Giggler. Před 10 měsíci

    Wow, wel I know which one I’m buying! Thanks

  • @evanpc4577
    @evanpc4577 Před 9 měsíci

    J'ai acheté la DHS680 du coup car c'est impresionnant on voir que sur la DSS611 le raccord daspiration c'est blocker

  • @PaguPvs-le
    @PaguPvs-le Před 2 lety +3

    The best test ever! 💪💪💪

  • @johnkenedy3635
    @johnkenedy3635 Před 2 lety

    Makita face to face ! Great review!

  • @guydoeseverything
    @guydoeseverything Před 2 lety +5

    Cant really judge because no real comparison which blades are used. A saw's rip cutting abilities are mostly made up by tooth count and sharpening geometry. Looks like the 680 had a Z12 on, but cant see what the 611 has. Probably Z24.

  • @KpopLabPro
    @KpopLabPro Před rokem

    Thanks!!

  • @djjoeykmusic
    @djjoeykmusic Před rokem

    Great video
    Thank you so much
    Blessings

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před rokem +1

      Thank you for watching the video 🖖

  • @davidhill431
    @davidhill431 Před 2 lety +5

    Thank you for not putting 5 mins of waffle at the start

  • @erikm9768
    @erikm9768 Před 2 měsíci

    Same blade used?

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před 2 měsíci

      No, the 680 is equipped with a fast Efficut type blade, thinner and sharper.

  • @SuperCraig1973
    @SuperCraig1973 Před 2 lety

    Had 2 of dhs680 both of them only lasted 8 months motors burn out looks like I’ll be getting a third 😪

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před 2 lety +1

      Sorry to hear that, mine works impeccably

    • @markr1142
      @markr1142 Před 6 měsíci +1

      I've had mine 8 years, it is still going strong. At least yours are under warranty.

  • @UncleIvan1
    @UncleIvan1 Před 2 lety

    makita!!!

  • @StelioKontoss
    @StelioKontoss Před 2 měsíci +2

    A bit easy to push less on a saw while making a rip cut so it seems " slower " 🙄 these tests are bs

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před 2 měsíci

      Stop being ridiculous. Both saws are mine and they are the same brand, there is no reason to falsify a test in this case. It is a circular that has 1500RPM in addition, a fast Efficut blade and a Brushless motor.

    • @StelioKontoss
      @StelioKontoss Před 2 měsíci

      @@ToolTest YOU dont be ridiculous. So many fake stuff nowadays. Your "test" have so many variables, battery, temp, wood grain, force of push etccc. Bogus imo

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před 2 měsíci

      ​@@StelioKontoss​​I just explained why you are being ridiculous and why your concerns about this test are not valid. Your answer is typical of a frustrated person who has been shown to be talking nonsense, and now you feel bad and you really want to have the last reply. It's ok for me. 👌

    • @StelioKontoss
      @StelioKontoss Před 2 měsíci

      @@ToolTest lol nah your test is just BS and now you butthurt cuz you cant prove its optimal so you label me as a typical angry comment guy. Too easy. Learn how to make good comparisons.

    • @StelioKontoss
      @StelioKontoss Před 2 měsíci

      @@ToolTest what you explained was that both saws were yours and the same brand... LOL are you.. rtarded?😬

  • @electrolatif
    @electrolatif Před rokem

    Cant compare 3700rpm with 5000rpm
    😂😂😂first one slow because the speed just 3700rpm but the second 5000rpm😂😂😂

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před rokem +5

      That is precisely why they can be compared. Users can see how the brushed motor model performs in contrast to the newer brushless motor model and improved performance. Thus, they can make the decision to buy the model they need.

    • @user-vf7gj3my9z
      @user-vf7gj3my9z Před 7 měsíci

      Здравствуйте!Мне очень понравились Ваши видео и тест сравнение,не могли бы Вы сделать тест сравнение этой пилы dns680 с новой моделью на 40в hs012g,очень было бы интересно,срасибо!!!​@@ToolTest

  • @SGIBAI
    @SGIBAI Před rokem +3

    Как говорят в России:
    Не сравнивай хер с пальцем

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před rokem +1

      Sorry, I didn't understand your comment

    • @SGIBAI
      @SGIBAI Před rokem

      @@ToolTest these tools cannot be compared and put on the same shelf😜

    • @SGIBAI
      @SGIBAI Před rokem

      @@ToolTest there is a saying in Russia: compared a member with a finger 🤔

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před rokem +1

      Why not?

    • @user-mk4jg4uq6b
      @user-mk4jg4uq6b Před rokem +2

      У меня вообще 610-й и ничего! Мне хватает!

  • @floreamihai.
    @floreamihai. Před 2 lety +1

    la asta nici nu iti scriu in engleza.. urat.. mi-ai umilit circularul 😭😭

  • @michaelstride1
    @michaelstride1 Před rokem

    the brushless tool motors die faster than the brushed. BUT yes the brushless has more power.
    Brushless will last you 1 years
    Brushed will last you 7 years

    • @ToolTest
      @ToolTest  Před rokem +3

      According to who? At the contrary, Brushless motors have an average lifespan of twice as much as those with carbon brushes, and this is due to the fact that it no longer has a collector that wears out and must be replaced. The main problem is that the Brushless motor is more expensive to repair, in case of a failure.

    • @SergeiZakharov
      @SergeiZakharov Před 8 měsíci +2

      The main problem is not in the motor, but in the control board, it is it dies most often, and is changed only together with the motor and costs as a new saw.
      I apologise if the automatic translator is bad.

    • @Coppice1
      @Coppice1 Před 5 měsíci

      Its basically carbs vs fuel injection. Yes you might need to change the brushes but its cheap and easy. The speed controllers on the BL will likely mean a new saw. But the batteries are a big proportion of the cost so the efficiency of a brushless motor might mean your battery lasts twice as long so be cheaper in the long run. My drill/driver are BL but in this case i'll probably go brushed as there's a higher load on a saw motor.

  • @ricardoedwardo5799
    @ricardoedwardo5799 Před 2 měsíci

    Offt😮 680 for me🫡