This Is The World Map But In 2100
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 10. 2023
- According to me
If you want to support more videos like this one, I have a patreon:
/ toycat
This is the "scratch off" map I use to track which countries I've been to:
amzn.to/45ZsPlE
/ toycat - Subreddit community! For discussions on all the things you see on this channel
Check out my probably main channel at / ibxtoycatletsplays
Also on twitter @ibxtoycat
The ocean going black is the most realistic part
that and the maldives completely disappearing
Actually the most realistic part is having the moon next to this map because America would have let those colonies have their independence after they realised there is no oil on the Moon
Fr
Lol
23:03 "I don't think one country on the planet can exist under one family's rule fo over 100 years."
The Habsburgs:
To be fair, the inbreeding in the end game of the Hapsburgs was knarly! 😬
Ah, the duality of man. Minecraft and geopolitics.
Don’t forget the third channel walk/scoot/bike and talks! 👍
he's better at geopolitics than 99% of solely politics channels ngl
Basically me when i was 13
I'm young enough that if I get lucky I will be alive in 2100
I'm actually excited to see what the world will look like
Yeah everybody born in the 2000s has the chance to see it
Maybe
No you won't. April 28th, remember that date
@@frantasperl5076tf are you talking about
You are not ready for April 28
As someone living in Costa Rica, I can say with 100% certainty that a Central American federation will never happen again. There are so much political tensions between the countries, and also a lot of nationalism, so I can't even imagine someone proposing such a union. It would be the most unpopular proposal ever.
jaja tuanis
Wales has actually had 1 Prime Minister (David Lloyd George).
He was born in England, but moved to Wales 2 months later. He grew up in Wales, spoke Welsh, had Welsh parents, etc.
If you argue that he was English you also have to agree that Boris was our first American Prime Minister.
Oh he did lol
Than he's English? If you're born in England than you're English, not Welsh. I don't believe you know how nationality works lol.
@@deutschegeschichte4972 Do you know how nationality works? Nationality refers to the legal status of an individual. In this Case Lloyd George was undeniably British. Ethnicity refers to their ancestry and cultural group. In this case he was undeniably Welsh (given that he was raised in Wales, born to Welsh parents, literally spoke welsh, and died in Wales). Ethnicity is the question here, as neither Wales nor England are nation-states. The UK also doesn't practice birthright citizenship (as far as I'm aware), unlike most New World states (like America).
I’m not sure how Finland got some its territory back from Russia but I’m happy for it.
It looks like Russia kind of collapsed in his map. You might notice the independent states in the Caucasus.
There is St Petersburg in this map seized by Finland or EU. This looks strange because then Finland population will double 😂
You missed the whole Central Asian situation. The borders set up by Stalin are obviously going to be challenged some time in the future.
i personally doubt that. maybe a few of the exclaves but not much apart from that
@@Nooticus You have obviously missed the whole conflict about Nagorno-Karabakh and the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic situation. You also have the stan situation, where upstream nations controls the water supply to neighboring nations. Countries such as Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are considered “downstream” countries, while Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are considered “upstream” countries.
20% of the total water resources used in Uzbekistan are formed inside the country, and 80% are formed in neighboring Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. These two relatively poor “upstream” countries are interested in generating and exporting more electricity through the construction of hydroelectric dams and reservoirs, which creates serious problems for agricultural water supply in other countries in the region.
In 2050, the shortage of fresh water in Central Asia could lead to an 11% decrease in GDP.
By 2030, estimates say Uzbekistan will be short 7 billion cubic metres per year, or 25% of the total usage.
This, together with the messy borders, spells war.
In the capital of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, residents found themselves without access to clean drinking water for several days, which caused a wave of discontent and led to protests, including blocking the capital’s main roads. And then there's Kazakhstan. It is a water-dependent country. Only 2.8% of its territory is covered with water, while arid zones represent two-thirds. A significant part of the water resources comes from neighboring countries, which is why the issue of using transboundary rivers is vital for the republic.
I love how he says somaliland will be independent then doesn't put it on the map. And also yes I agree that it will be independent. Also I doubt South Sudan will join the East African Federation, they keep adding more countries and that's been one of the things keeping them from being able to integrate towards becoming a country, so I think the way thay they'll be able to unite is to just integrate the core countries who were in the federation for a long time.
I'm pretty sure South Sudan is already a pretty well integrated part of the East African Community. ibx2cat seems to have forgotten that even the Democratic Republic of the Congo wants to join the East African Federation!
@cm222 yeah and the DRC would absolutely make it take significantly longer to integrate. If anything they should start with just 2 countries, and only slowly expand into the other countries merging in
6:32 your plan? Toycat are you sure you aren’t hiding your plans for world domination in this video?
Today his Minecraft world… tonight, Pinky, we try to take over the (real) world! 🐭🐀🐭 (Sorry, too much Animaniacs! 😅)
'I dont think one country can exist under one family for a hundered years'. Toycat you're from the UK you should know better
And most monarchys do. For example: Russian empire under Romanovs and Rurik prior.
bro did india bad, us sikhs have given our blood for india.
Feel like Darfur has a good chance of leaving Sudan and becoming West Sudan tbh.
On the EU, yes I think it is heading towards being a unified state, but in doing so it will probably lose some members as well as pick some up. Probably there would be a ring of members in deals such as Norway has now, but I don't think you can count them all in as EU members. It seems very unlikely to me that Iceland or Norway would join. They haven't so far, and what will have changed?
I think if the EU is to move forward with integration in a functional way it must do so in a multi-tiered model. (As well as of course getting rid of unanimity as a first step before ANYTHING else)
I don't see the Central American countries joining into a federation. I do see the possibility of English-speaking Cameroun breaking away from Cameroun, which is mostly French speaking, and either becoming an independent country or becoming part of Nigeria, where the bridge language is also English.
coming back to this video in 2100 to see i it checks out
I thought this would be about all the territories going underwater by 2100...
I am Indian Punjabi (atheist but Hindu on paper with many Sikh family members) and since the 90s the situation has been very stable and no one really wants independence,just some religious and regional concessions.
Punjab (and Chandigarh, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana - former united Punjab basically) is one of the best developed parts of India and it can't function as an independent land locked state.
Considering that I haven't many Khalistanis claim the Pakistani side of Punjab, the motivations here should be a bit of red flag.
Punjab state is about 45% Non Sikh and Indian Punjab region is barely 25% Sikh.
Sikhs and Punjabis in general form a disproportionate amount of the Indian armed forces so I doubt secession will be very successful since it was the same forces who put down the previous violent movement (it was a bit like troubles).
I think in the future Pakistani will probably collapse, some parts will normalise relations with India (like Bangladesh), some will join some Iran led union.
Although some part of it will probably exist as a rogue state like North Korea.
Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives and maybe Bangladesh and other parts of former Pakistan will probably form some EU like arrangement.
Bangladesh and Sri Lanka might join the ASEAN (too?) which itself might move to an EU like arrangement.
Why would they put a claim on Pakistani Punjab though? It's Pakistan's most populated province and literally 99.5% Muslim with nearly 200 million people. Sikhs would just go from being a minority in India to a minority in Khalistan. The reason khalistanis I assume want Indian Punjab is because Sikhs constitute a much larger percentage of the population compared to other provinces.
@@temptemp4174 its because theyre stupid nationalists and extremists
most normal people there are very well aware that an independent punjab is a poorly thought out idea
@@temptemp4174the reason why Khalistanis should want Pakistani Punjab region is because the consept of khalistan resides on the idea of a united Punjab as it was in the 1700 and the capital and the memorials of the Sikh kings are in the Pakistani Punjab region and not wanting that region is just plain stupid or it'll go against thier overlord's wishes. Whats the most probabl reason: Khalistanis being dumb which they are or Thier funding being stopped cuz they want a portion of Pakistan too now from ISI
@@temptemp4174
Nope
It's because this whole khalistan situation was started by ziaul haq 70s pm of Pakistan🇵🇰
Good video but I feel like something is missing...
Where was the airfryer promotion?
Interesting predictions!
Personally I think Ireland and Cyprus are gonna change within the next 100 years. It's hard to say which way but I'd bet on Turkey officially annexing the north of Cyprus and Ireland uniting (or maybe parts of it joining Ireland with some remaining British).
I agree on Greenland becoming independent and with Northwest Passage opening up it will likely grow wealthier from shipping over next 100 years. I also wouldn't be surprised if Quebec achieved independence (they got so insanely close in 1995) and then if Quebec leaves I could see the remaining provinces of Canada signing a compact free association with the US (Similar to the Marshall Islands or Palau) .
Depending on how the Russia-Ukraine conflict goes that border might change along with Belarus officially joining Russia and Moldova maybe joining Romania.
With South Africa I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up breaking apart into smaller states, like Cape and a Zulu state. With the way things are going we could see this sooner than later... (Hopefully things improve down there!) Also wouldn't surprise me if more countries achieve independence, like Azawad from Mali, Ambazonia from Cameroon, etc. (Maybe 60+ countries by 2123?)
The area that I think will get the most more new countries is Oceania. Bougainville is supposed to get independence in just a few years, and with the warming climate some countries will need to relocate or cease to exist. If things really warm up maybe will get some new Antarctica countries.
Ireland might reunify idk if they will because of the violence that would ensue. I doubt turkey does that they have no reason to and might be sanctioned.
I agree on those
Agreed
Would not be surprised if those happen but I doubt 61 new countries by then
There not supposed to it still needs to be ratified by png Parliament but it’s meant to be this year and times running out so idk if it will happen
I meant more like 60+ countries in Africa altogether, so maybe 6 to 7 new ones in the next 100 years. And will see about Turkey. They seem to be really into expanding lately and I wouldn't be surprised if they have another war with Greece in the next 100 years. That might spark change on Cyprus, only time will tell though. @@gothicgolem2947
13:04- There’s only a little over 76 years left before 2100, Toycat. My 6 y.o. daughter has a good shot at seeing that year! 🤯 Are you trying to grow out your hair? It actually looks kind of okay, given it’s in that awkward in-between stage. You could totally rock a ponytail; it would vibe with your contrarian tendencies! 👍
Sicily, Sardinia, and Corsica gaining independence is a bit of a hot take 😂
when did he say any of that
@@orvinal2883it's a joke, he didn't colour them blue at first so it looked like they were independent
The northern countries already has it's own union. Called Nordic Council. Imagine UK but without any countries losing their independence to anyone else
You missed these:
(Northwestern Ireland in UK)
Southern Karelia in Finway
4 or 5 new Caucus countries slash larger Ukraine
Orenburg Oblast in Kazakhstan
Southern Mali, including a part of Burkini Faso
Western Cameroon
Funny that Sicilly is the only island that I instantly noticed being out of the EU, when pretty much all visible islands in the Mediterranean are in the EU.
One thing that I can definitely confirm in the year 2100, the world population will have at least 4 people.
extinction level asteroid in 2099:
@@ramble21 underground civilization:
30:57 Loved the special appearance of our lord and savior the Ninja OL501 Foodi 6.5 Qt. Pressure Cooker Steam Fryer with SmartLid, 14-in-1 that Air Fries, Bakes & More, with 2-Layer Capacity & 4.6 Qt. Crisp Plate, Silver/Black
Your South Africa scenario will not happen. The only thing Lesotho has going for them is the water they sell to South Africa, which they will loose is they merge with SA. Namibia has a competitive strategy by opening up their coast as major import port to the other land locked countries, which are dependent on SA ports. Botswana is doing better than SA, so they would have no incentive to join another country. Mozambique speaks a different language, which is a total blocker. As for Zimbabwe, not even SA is stupid enough to get into that mess. Unless there is a very aggressive military regime that invades and unifies the region, these countries have more reasons to stay out of each others business than to join up.
I support this future because of the small map changes that you didn't notice
hope youre doin well homie
He seems to be holding up, we’re all glad of that, I’m sure! ❤
Love how he didnt notice that all of Kashmir was owned by china in that map i think kashmirs borders are good as they are right now
20:45 “South America has no changes whatsoever”
Unless Venezuela ties to annex Guyana a month later.
Whoops
At least for now I don't think Costa Rica would agree to join a Central American Union, they would have to do so much economical heavy lifting. Let alone political differences. Nicaragua is a dictatorship and Honduras is unfortunately going the Venezuelan way
95-98% sikhs are backing india and not the khalistanis (sikh saparatists ). Most of this separatists are based in western countries and pakistan and funded by pakistan and khalistani politicians in west. Please do not display distorted map of India, Kashmir is the integral part of india.
On the UK, I disagree, I think Scotland going it alone is becoming less likely, but it is more likely than a United Ireland. The demographics are a red herring, NI is becoming less Unionist, but it is also becoming less nationalist, the growth is in "I don't really care one way or the other", that attitude is not one that would overcome the pretty huge practical problems of joining the Republic. So both are possible, but if I was staking my life on it, I would say neither by 2100.
Turkey wont allow a new country to form inside their borders, thats for sure. And I dont think South Sudan will be likely to lose it's indenpendence after getting it finally. Also Papa New Guine (idk how to spell it), they wont change, Indonesia wont allow that to happen for sure, and central america wont unite. Also situation in Ukraine, I dont think only crimea will be russian, its kinda stale mate over there for a year now. Russia has build up its defense and its not going to be easy to break through, so I would say new borders in Ukraine will be somewhat close to situation that is right now
"I don't think it will change because the countries do not want it"
You know that's rarely the case yet it happens anyways, over a hundred years a lot can change
@@IDKisReal2401all the countries involved are powerful countries that are only growing in power. Unless something else major happens, the status quo is here to stay
The main factor in the China/Taiwan situation is the fact that China's population should be about 800 million by 2100.
Honestly the thing that I for sure don't see happening for a central america republic is el salvador joining just because of recent historical tensions with Honduras
I don’t see Russia lasting til the end of the century as it exists
Funny how he said South America wouldn't change in 100 years and in less than a month there is already a massive border conflict
Belarus stays independant?!
When Putin falls or dies I think Lukashenko is doomed and people will revolt and demand freedom
I'd like to see the southern part of the State of Florida SEPERATE from the U.S. and join this Caribbean federation. Florida itself is vastly different from the rest of the U.S. and South Florida is vastly different from the rest of Florida. If this were to happen, Miami would be the clear cut favorite to be the capitol of the region due to the intense melting pot of Caribbean culture that resides within the city and latin America as a whole.
Good luck with secession from the US. 🤓
Miami will be mostly underwater by 2100. Parts of it are already close enough. Havana would make more sense as capital.
As a Floridian, yes. I don't want to join the Caribbean federation though. I think we should be our own seperate thing. I also believe it would be hilarious if we made our official language Czech. I already have a flag design.
Interesting to see he didn't touch on the Mali situation
I don’t think there will be a Kurdish state, especially the Turkish part
The Kurdish language is not banned anymore and there are Kurdish members of parliament and Kurdish people in the Supreme Court
Many westerners also don’t realise that the Kurds and Turks are very good friends and many Kurds support Turkey
According to toycat, all islands will become independet, including Great Britain from Norther Ireland
As complex as the situation is right now, by 2100 I think the UK (in whatever form that takes) will have some sort of closer arrangement with the EU. It might not be full EU (or European Federation, in this case) membership but definitely some kind of EEA-style membership, like Iceland and Norway has now with the EU. Economically and politically, that's what I see as being the most likely outcome, seeing as it just makes sense, at least to me. There's already a growing sense of 'bregret' over Brexit, so in 70-ish years time, I don't see how the UK wouldn't be closer to the EU in some way. Admittedly, I did vote Remain, but the world is becoming increasingly polarised and having strong groups of countries with similar interests in socio-political and economic unions will become the big 'trend' over the next few decades.
as an italian i think an united europe is like uniting asia it is too diverse to unite, i wouldn't like to lose my country to create a new country even if it going "toward a unified state"
A mostly united Europe would be similar to a united China. many ethnic minorities united together but with fringe countries on the borders retaining independence
@@JustinLe you can't compare that the unification of china was a forced one with a lot resistance too many revolution warloads falls of empires meanwhile the unification of europe i think would be some peace ful unification even though i doubt it would be stable at all, an united europe is just an austria hungary on steroids
I don’t think that it’s really fair to compare Europe to Asia, because Asia is much larger and culturally divided than Europe. I think it’s more fair to compare Europe to something like the Indian subcontinent
@@Janbed4827 not really remember Yugoslavia? Or Austria Hungary?
@@NUMBER1RATEDSALESMAN I don’t know much about Yugoslavia, but Austria-Hungary really isn’t comparable to the EU because A-H was an empire controlled by just Austria and Hungary while the EU is controlled by all member states. And even then, A-H’s collapse was mostly caused by WW1.
Why does Finland have Karjala in the beginning? :D
are there no major wars in your timeline at all?
19:52 *Australia and Antarctica have left the chat*
Had to pause the video to go play the club penguin fishing game
the moon or mars territory allocation will be interesting in 2100.Becouse we will have many small colonies there
I think it is very unlikely the EU becomes a federation/country
I fucking love your 2nd channel videos. Weirdly, I always found geography etc super dull at school; but ig I just wasn't taught right.
I feel with Northern Ireland it will go less the route of Seinn Feinn and form a united Ireland and more the line of the Alliance party being neither unionist or nationalist and with Taiwan, I feel they will only really join china willingly is if whoever Xi's successors are go down a route that is more democrati and less authoratarian.
Albania will probably be in the EU long before Bosnia
sheer lunacy
Someone remind me in 76 years
:0 Time for Toycat to make this happen
You should rate the submissions for Minnesota's new state flag. There are some hilarious ones (including one that's just a vertical photo of some guy's dog).
I'm really surprised there was nothing about the effects of climate change and sea level rise-some places are expected to be too hot to live in, and others to be underwater already, by 2100. There's also nothing on the indigenous rights and Land Back movements in the U.S. and Canada, or the Hawaiian Sovereignty movement. I sort of imagine New Zealand and Hawaii together spearheading a Polynesian Federation, but maybe that's too far-fetched. I can say that from inside the U.S. right now, it doesn't feel like the U.S. will still exist by 2100; maybe not even by 2040.
From one Amercican to another I honestlly see no changes happening and in general I agree with most of what toycat said here. The thing is hawaii I honestly cannot see the US letting go of it or any states really and that for any other states. However I can totally see the merging of certain states happening and that is what will probably be most likely to happen IMO. But the Union dissolving feels, at least for right now and what the evidence is leading to, pretty unlikely.
I think definitely Puerto Rico becomes the e 51st US State and maybe some other territories too
I think for South America Guyana have border changes with Venezuela and Suriname for the Guyana Esequiba
i reckon the EU might try to expand outside of europe at some point (obvs would need a new name) and might try get australia and new zealand
"That is my plan... Er, that is what i think will happen"
Dog should have studied GIS in Uni
Also have a look at QGIS so you don't have to make your maps in paint 😅. Q is free and open source, open street maps uses controversial borders as well and native tongue names 😊
I am looking forward to the next video on your main channel Andrew Andrew's...
Yes, we need to know how the South American McDonald’s measure up! 🤔
Why would Greenland go independent? Could they realistically survive without Denmark?
Yeah I didn't agree with that lol. Unless Greenland get's something going for them, I don't think they could survive without denmark.
Why TF is Kaliningrad part of the EU? And what is going on with the other islands around the EU, most importantly the half of Denmark?
13:29
*Declared war on Hamas, not Palestine, after a massacre.
26:30 They already tried that, didn't work the first time.
South Sudan is already part of the East Africaj Community. DR Congo is as well, and Somalia is very close to joining.
I think Iran would collaspe and Kurdistan and Azerbaijan gain land from it, and I think WW3 would happen and china loses western lands like east turkestan and tibet, and Belarus would definetly join russia
Nah Albania will probably join way before 2100
You should read about SICA, its kinda like an EU but for Central America
Quebec, currently on a low simmer, but Alberta/BC can clearly see the advantages of an independent future- not pretending to speak French! California similar, with just two Senators for the most populous and wealthy State, why not? But as you suggest, if Canada splits how would that follow through? Maine, possibly, but Washington and Oregon joining British Colombia/Alberta (Pacifica)? Wisconsin/Minnesota?
Wales and Scotland will definitely have left the English by 2100, you only need to look at support for independence amongst younger voters and the absolute dump that the UK is and will continue to be for a long time.
Scotland possibly, but not Wales. Independence support hasn't budged in the last decade its 20 to 25% overall, and younger voters are only slightly more favourable to it than the average. Even amongst voters for PC, the only party in favour of it, support is barely over 50%. Geographically, legally, culturally, politically and economically Wales is much more connected with England than Scotland is.
@@leehallam9365 That's not correct, support for Welsh independence is around a third, which has "stablilized" over the past 5-ish years, including a majority of PC voters and around half of Labour voters. Around a decade ago it consistently polled around 10% and had done so for decades and wasn't even on the political agenda.
As for the political and legal aspects Wales continues to diverge from England, and culturally the Scots are probably more similar to the English than the Welsh frankly.
There's also the point that were Scotland to go it alone, England&Wales just isn't workable, it'd be even more lopsided than thr UK currently is.
@@Rachub I did check the polls before I wrote that, and yes there is one new polling company that this year has put support at 30 to 33% in polls this year. It's hard for polling companies to be sure their panels represent opinion when there are no actual votes to benchmark again. They can't ask how did you vote in the last referendum. The clue though is that PC gets between 10 and 20% in elections, which is why I honestly think the other polling companies who have a longer track record are right. I think there are parts of Wales where you are right about cultural differences, but not most of it. There is a lot of overlap on the borders and much stronger cross border ties to neighbouring parts of England than is the case with Scotland.
@@leehallam9365 Usually don't knows are excluded for headline figures, but there are other clues - 10 years ago a good, consistent 85%ish would say they're against, now it's more 50-60% with Don't Knows being a good third or more of the population. There's a hell of a lot of disillusionment with the union in Wales which is very much unnoticed over the border.
I wouldn't consider thE PC vote a strong indicator either. One thing I will say is that whilst support for independence is historically high, I don't think it's the top priority for many (it's more of "we'd vote for it in a referendum").
I'm afraid you've got it the wrong way round culturally - there are parts of Wales, such as Monmouthshire or the NW coast that are more similar to England frankly (mass migration by English pensioners being one reason in the second case), but otherwise it really isn't, especially in the west and the valleys, in spite of the cross border ties (of which there are a lot).
@@Rachub That does push up the noes too, so it is essentially 2 to 1 against, and its been static for 10 years, support jumped after the Scottish vote, but that isn't a trend. I think the point is as you say it isn't a priority for voters, and referendums don't just happen there has to be concerted pressure. Perhaps that will happen, but there is no sign of it,
I do see Northern Caucasus gaining independence.
26:34 bro just offended 170 million people (1970 flashbacks)
Why is mali split into 2?
Why would Indonesia agree to ceding west guinea?
Mr Cat, would you please make a video about all the republics of the Russian Federation? Would make a good video with history and culture combined.
My opinions:
Northern Ireland - either that status quo remains or the UK joins the EU
EU - I actually think it will grow further apart rather than integrating into a collective state. Too many big personalities in the room. I think all of the Balkans will have joined the EU including Kosovo within the next 20 years.
Norway - don’t get the union with Finland, they will stay two countries. I think Norway joining the EU is 50/50 depending on how volatile the world is.
Iceland - similar to Norway
Greenland - leaning towards independence, I agree here.
Kurdistan - it hasn’t existed yet and I don’t think it ever will. All the four countries that share it are unlikely to collapse (two of those were in huge civil wars and still didn’t completely collapse)
Western Sahara - I think Morocco will annex it and it will be officially autonomous. It’s certainly heading that way.
EAF - not going to happen, I think it could be a confederation but most of the countries in it are too unstable. Also wouldn’t go ahead leaving members behind like South Sudan and DRC
Lesotho - I think it will stay. South Africa doesn’t even look after itself very well.
Palestine - I think this war is the beginning of the road to independence. Gaza will likely have the PNA installed and this would give that group a lot more leverage
Cyprus - will stay as it is
The Americas and Caribbean - will probably remain as it is except for a slightly tighter economic union. The only changes I think will happen are the independence of some of the British, French and Dutch territories remaining.
Taiwan - will stay as it is
Hong Kong - think it will be absorbed
North and South Korea - will stay separate but I think the relationship will be less hostile.
India - probably stay the same. I think Kashmir will likely escalate in our lifetimes
Everywhere else in Asia - stay the same
New Caledonia and French Polynesia - will likely both be independent.
Everywhere else in Oceania - stay the same provided they haven’t been sunk
What's up with double Mali?
I think CANZUK will be a thing for sure in 2100
Love these 5 AM releases 😂
Its like noon for him
before sunrise in the US, completely reasonable time in Europe.
(it was released at around 10 AM in the UK)
Zero Welsh prime ministers I think you need to do some more research when I comes to UK politics. Not only has there been a Welsh PM (David Lloyd George) but he is also the only PM whose first language wasn’t English.
By 2100 I would say it’s virtually guaranteed both Scotland and Wales are independent.
Also completely disagree with your view of the EU becoming a super state. I think nationalism and populism is growing in Europe. Add in aging population and falling/stagnating GDP. I think Europe is far more likely to splinter into more and more independent states.
I think Western Cape in South Africa will break away and become independent.
Bangladesh used to be East Pakistan, in union with Pakistan. They were not compatible in terms of religion, despite both being Muslim, hence we today have Bangladesh. I don’t think they are likely at all to unite with Pakistan again.
Just set a reminder to watch this video in 2073
Kazakhstan gets Orenburg back letsgoooooooooooooooooooooooo
*Other stuff I would like to add to this video:*
- Monaco will cease to exist and will become a part of France. This is because there is are male-preference cognatic primogeniture.
- Belgium will split up with Wallonia also becoming a part of France and Flanders it's own country with Brussels in it.
- Flanders, Ukraine, Moldova, Turkey, Russia, all Balkan countries and Switzerland will join the EU.
- The UK will likely join back the EU. It would benefit them more and hold them from dissolving.
- Palestine will cease to exist, Palestinians will flee to Europe, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and will be all over the world, scattered.
- Kurdistan will not happen, same situation as Palestine, it's a minority group so they live in hiding.
- Other African countries would likely join the East African Federation, which will include Ethiopia & Mozambique too.
- Some Caribbean countries will become US states, just like Hawaii & Alaska. Cuba will likely also join them.
- French Guyana will declare it's independence.
- Taiwan will be taken over by China by force. USA will try to intervene but China will threaten war and USA will back out.
- China will invade Russia and will get a part of Siberia. Japan will also take over the islands Russia now claims.
- Russia will fall apart but it's European part will still exist. Crimea will be taken back by Ukraine.
- Oceania will become a federation with all island countries over the pacific with parlement in Australia.
- India will become a federation instead of a country because it has too many people and too many religions.
No comment on the caucasus?
Synchronizing watches. See y’all in 2100.
woohoo map!!!!
26:32 thats what the british thought but then the pakistans decided to split apart
Well, considering the comments of most of the other people here, and my own opinion, I think it's safe to say that the community agrees that this analysis is NOT VERY GOOD.
I’m not very informed about a lot of this, but I have no idea why he thinks that any of the 7 Central American countries that have been separated for forever are going to unify. 🤷♀️
@@misspatvandriverlady7555 the entire time I was watching it I was thinking to myself, "sir, do you think or not?"
Literally only thing I agree with is the possibility of the East African Federation.
His analysis is better than most others lol.
@@deutschegeschichte4972 I suppose the almighty algorithm has not favored you, then.
nice
the world will become (various tribes) in 2100
"0 prime ministers being Welsh" - what about David Lloyd George?
He meant born in Wales. David Lloyd George was born in Manchester.
@@JediSimpson Alrighty then. Thanks for clarifying.
I think you’re forgetting about WW3 in 2058. Nuclear winter seriously messed up climate change.