Where Do Migrants Actually Move?
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 05. 2023
- If you want to support more videos like this one, I have a patreon:
/ toycat
/ toycat - Subreddit community! For discussions on all the things you see on this channel
Check out my probably main channel at / ibxtoycatletsplays
Also on twitter @ibxtoycat
"Don't waste time using other Canadian dollar alternatives" 😂
wait that actually killed me 🤣🤣🤣
Do you have a time stamp?
@@Luredreier Around 2:27
@@eudstersgamersquad6738 Thank you. :-)
Didn't catch that part. :-)
Lol 🤣
When he talked about the British prime minister, I honestly had no clue who currently held that position and how he/she looks like.
I was about to do a google search and then I thought: "Don't bother, tomorrow it's going to be someone else".
Sunak's not going anywhere. Too much rests on his shoulders and he wouldn't benefit at all if he left.
@@MiguelDLewis yeah but what that means is that especially if he stays a really long time in 40 years the question of who was the PM when Elizabeth II past away will be a hard trivia question
@@jackbrown3193 You make a very good point.
Yes but why is that a problem? Would you rather we had the same leadership ’issues’ as Russia or Turkey? I certainly don’t…
RIP UK
As a german I guarantee you that the people answering the survey around 8:20 thought of refugees more then immigrants who came through official channels. Of course there is a split sentiment on immigrants as well, tho it I'd estimate it to be more equal. On that note I just have to quote one of my relatives "those Syrians and Africans are nothing like our good old Turks!" which I found rather funny.
As a Dutch person I was thinking about refugees about half of the time as well
Lol
Legal immigration is good, if they properly integrate (or preferably assimilate).
Illegal immigration is flat out bad, fullstop.
Yeah, it's weird.
Here in Norway our old immigrants are Pakistanis, Yoguslavs and Somalians etc.
Not so much Turks.
But they've generally integrated well and contributed quite a bit.
I think it's more about being used to migrants. The UK is used to generations of people coming from the former colonies and working here. True there were tensions back in the day but it wasn't until the mass migration from EU as well as people from former French colonies that we got a bit nervous about the numbers coming. I know Germany invited Turks to help rebuild the country, but what historic connection does have Germany have with Syria or Afghanistan?
USA Citizenship Test: "What will be your demonym if you migrated into the U.S.A."
*South Americans all start sweating*
America is an adjective for the USA. I am from the southern cone and have no problem in using that. Don't confuse Mexicans with the rest of Latin America.
I use Americans to refer to people from the USA which doesn't mean I am not from THE Americas.
Canadians, Mexicans and other North Americans too
12:35 - "We generally use voluntary immigration"
Words to live by
It would be interesting to separate those countries by the occupations or income of those immigrants. I suspect some countries are singling out skilled or wealthy workers much more so than others, and this can affect sentiments towards immigrants.
I think the biggest reason many people dislike/hate large scale immigration is mainly cultural. Major immigration can bring big benefits economically, but it tends to drive social tensions through the roof, especially if the immigrants show little interest in assimilating to the native culture. In the US, it seems that most new arrivals are willing or even eager to become Americans, but that isn't always the case. Europe seems to struggle quite a bit more than Anglo countries on this issue. I think this stuff mainly stems from huge cultural gaps and historic conflict between civilizations, particularly the West vs Islam, or India vs Islam. Ofc, there are also the bona fide racists, who would hate immigrants whether there were 6 or 6 million of them in a given country, but there aren't that many of them overall
Well a part of it is how well the country’s culture can accept immigrants in the first place. It is easier for a country with a long history of European immigration like the USA to accept non-European immigrants because the framework for integration is already there. A lot of European countries formed in the first place from sentiments of ethnic nationalism so it is harder to detach from that.
@@Joseph-qd9ew Absolutely
@@Joseph-qd9ewExactly
I’d rather have my native homeland than become richer. I would never replace our people for money, that is pure evil
In the USA, it's popular to claim that the immigrants we're getting *now* are unwilling to assimilate, unlike the ones we used to get in the past. And they've made that complaint ever since the 1700s, before the USA even existed.
One of the United States' central ideas--especially since the post-Civil-War amendments, and the civil rights movement that put some teeth in them a hundred years later--is that we're not really an ethnically-based country; whether you are a real American doesn't have to do with your ancestry or religion or native language. But there's a large faction, increasingly loud at the moment but they've always been here, who do want it to be an ethnically-based country. So this is very much an issue of partisan conflict here.
Love ibx2xat's clever quip with working age graph "is the average valuable lifespan apparently you're Austrian". I'd say Peruvian instead as theirs is a vertical red-white-red tricolour? ;)
0:55 that zoom in was funnier than it should've been
btw, Are Mexicans United Mexican Statsians? It is, after all officially the United Mexican States. If they can choose the smaller name Mexico (as opposed I suppose to Mexican) then why can't the United States of America shorten it to America? All they are both doing is taking out "United" and "States". (Yes, I know there are other Americans. Interestingly, the Mexicans and Canadians don't mind us being called Norteamericanos. What? Are the Mexicans and Canadians NOT North Americans? How shameful to speak with such derision of the Great White North and El ombligo de la luna.)
I have a whole video making fun of people who don't think you can call the USA America, it sounds like you'd like it since we agree lol
Because there is no continent or subcontinent called "Mexico". That's the difference dude. Mexicans are not disrespecting anyone by calling themselves mexicans because no one else has a claim on the Mexican identity ;).
Please feel free to zoom in on Leicester more often Toycat!
7:21 “acording to this thing I should you earlier,France,Germany,Denmark and Sweden are not near to the top”
Sweden in rank 8: am I a joke to you?
I am Chilean, and here in Chile the problem of illegal immigration is brutal. In the last 5 years we have received more than 2 million immigrants, which represents 10% of the country's population (20 million). Most of the immigrants that arrive in Chile are Venezuelans, Colombians and Haitians...
Similarly Illegal immigration from Bangladesh and Myanmar has become a large problem in some parts of India. Breaking down fragile demographic ratios.
@@bonemarrow3439 It is true, when there is such a large demographic imbalance, many social problems occur in such a short time. For example, in my country crime has increased a lot, 10 years ago Chile was among the 20 safest countries in the world (safer than the United States), and now you can no longer go out in peace, since illegal immigrants are very violent... Another big problem is that they have made public services or community services collapse, which affects the poorest people in the country, and to top it off they have increased poverty... Until 2017 only 7% of the population lived below the poverty line, but now that has increased to 13% of the national population.
while I was in Peru I saw the same thing, tons of Venezuelan and Colombian immigrants, the majority of which are violent and have no respect
Chile received a lot of Venezuelans, the rest is a drop in a bucket. I think the Venezuelans didn't go there illegally though.
@@FOLIPE What? the only way Venezuelans get to Chile is illegally
Great video, very informative 😃👍
So this is a thing that's interesting between Scotland and England too. Not uncommon for people who grew up in Scotland to move down south for most of their career then come back when they've a growing family and to retire, N.I. to Scotland/England same thing too. I don't think deliberately but the budgets do end up balancing for this a bit so it works out re healthcare and schooling costs. UK has the opposite relationship in general with Ireland, and the US (you mentioned this). And people from Aus or NZ do the same the other way around often (move to UK or US in 20s/30s for a bit. Or from NZ to Aus.). Everyone is better off for it of course.
There are other high income migrant issues too, still think it's not a problem myself, but there are cases of e.g. wealthy Silicon Valley tech engineers moving for an easy job here and not caring about pushing the salary up and not needing training provided, thereby watering down the leverage of everyone else and other skills growth here, because they are already rich comparatively and don't need it.
Other side of the scale, I've heard from Bangladeshis that it's now harder to buy some traditional things there, food ingredients etc, because the migrant community here has so much more purchasing power!
Just such an interesting topic I wish it was easier to discuss without hate and ignorance being involved.
Controversial take: Capitalists and modern leftists benefit from immigration. Both for ideological reasons but the former for cheap labour and the latter for a voter base. The ones largely harmed by immigration are low to middle income and uneducated working class people. Class analysis brought to you by some random guy.
The middle class and to some extent the bourgeois too has recently also gotten effected by failed assimilation, leading to it even being recognised as a problem today.
For sure there's a class thing related to immigrants, competition for labor which impact middle and lower classes. But typically immigrants don't vote. Maybe their kids though.
That's a very North American/Western European point of view. The idea of Capitalism as being supported by the right from an idealogical viewpoint and leftists being the pro-immigrant side, or the side being supported by immigrants.
Capitalism is often not liked at all by the right in some places, as it sacrifices power and control for effeciency and anti-corruption policies. Also, in quite a few places immigrants want far stricter and let's call them older or anti-western values that align more with extremely conservative - 1630s level conservative - ideas.
Remember, the definition of right wing is conservatism, essentially the knee-jerk preference for what is perceived to be whatever policy was in practice in the past. And whatever policies were the practice in the past is different from place to place and might be the same policies that the left wants to introduce in other places as "new".
@@joshjones6072 Unless they are given citizenship. Its also not just hurting lower classes economically but also culturally. Workers and peasants are the bearers of culture, whereas higher classes nearly always have been attached with the international, may it be the french speaking aristocrats or todays political elites and the capital. I don't think its a coincidence that the working class in high extent has shifted from voting left to (non-liberal) right-wing. Often due to cultural reasons and not economical.
@@blumoogle2901 Yes, good point. When saying "modern leftism" I mainly meant the North American/European kind. In historical perspectives capitalism has been both supportive and against immigration. Also want to distinguish that from cultural right people.
"Children are ugly" Finally, someone telling the truth! That's why I'll never unsubscribe
As someone who's indifferent on migration the conclusion I've come to see it as both a pro/con.
It helps local small businesses stay afloat but in turn can lead to wage suppression for local workers. I think countries need to be more strategic/clever with migration. So it help improves everyone's quality of life ideally.
Politicians aren't interested in people's quality of life. They care more about GDP and overall wealth, most of which goes to a small few. That's why they allow immigration to happen, even though most natives are against it.
it also damages native culture
'Culture' is always changing anyway and never static. 'Damages' is a very prejudiced way of saying it. We're all humans after all, as long as freedom and civilian liberties are guaranteed, I'm not worried about culture that much.
@@CentauriSphere stop eroding his freedom of speech
@@somebody9825You must be joking
That zoom into the Balkans for "big burden" 😂
Why isn't the Vatican on the percentage of population list? It should be really high on there 🤔
It might use U.N lists
Because you can't live there unless you're a citizen and if you're a citizen of a country you're not a migrant
@@Eddiespaghetti69420 That’s not how it works, migrants are just people who moved into another place their legal status is irrelevant, they still moved to a state that they weren’t born into.
@@Eddiespaghetti69420 That’s not how it works, migrants are just people who moved into another place their legal status is irrelevant, they still moved to a state that they weren’t born into.
@@Eddiespaghetti69420 How would you call someone who is born in one country and moves into another country for work? Because that applies to 100% of the vatican population.
Okay, some are commuting over the border, so they are foreigners that come over for work, but don't immigrate.
I’d assume they move forwards and sometimes side to side, like most humans.
I move 2 steps forward and 1 to the side or 1 forward and 2 to the side. You can call me "Sir."
@@julianshepherd2038good knight
i def think it’s a mix of the two. rich countries are attractive to immigrants which in turn help make it richer. many value making a better life for themselves which then benefits the country.
they do not benefit the country
2:06 The term "United Statesians" has been proposed and used by some individuals and groups as an alternative demonym for people from the United States. However, it is difficult to pinpoint an exact starting date for its usage as it does not have widespread recognition or acceptance. The term has emerged as a linguistic attempt to distinguish individuals from the United States from the broader concept of "Americans" that can include people from the entire continent of North and South America. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that "American" remains the most commonly used and widely recognized demonym for people from the United States.
In Spanish we say Estadounidense
I really dislike that term. "Norteamericano" sounds better, and is much more descriptive geographically
AI generated af
Here to propose "US American" (pronounced You•Es). United Statesian sounds terrible.
@@geridamas935 YES it does. Not quite as bad in Spanish, but still not good
Great video
Thanks for this video. It's very interesting. 😃
The pre-colonisation population of the US ranged between 4 and 17 million but probably around 7 million.
"Canada isn't worth mentioning" period.
7:21 Classic Chad move: best is single digit, worst triple, so of course they rank #9. 🤭
Love the MS Paint graphics, very clearly says ‘second channel, don’t care’. 🤷♂️
After years of subscribing, I noticed today that this wasn't (only) a joke and he actually has a main channel
@@svr5423 i used to watch mc when I was a kid now I'm only subscribed to this one
Could you do a video explaining what would happen when a country decides to add a another national language?
For example if the UK decided to add Polish as it’s official 2nd national language alongside English, would it happen overnight? Would there be a nationwide vote on it like electing a new PM, who would decide these new changes etc… I think it’d be a really interesting topic
Keep up the good work Andrew!
The UK has no official language
South Africa is adding a new official language. The 12th 😭. And it's a sign language.
It was just a piece of legislation, but it means every official government resource/department has to support it, upon request, and depending on the need. Everything from whether public schools have to teach the language it if there's enough students who use it in the local area to what is printed on money to whether the court system has to pay interpreters to road signage is influenced.
MY guess is that it would depend on how the laws in the country are. Some might need a popular vote, some might do it in parliament, some might require additional state organs to give their go
I love when toycat does fast month in his head. Quite good. Nice to not hear someone complain about being bad at maths.
Come May 25th net migration to the UK for 2022 is likely to be close to 1 MILLION and your life expectancy is closer to 85 then 100.
15:40 There are quite a bit of foreign people living in my city in Croatia so idk about this
Those are workers. Big difference.
Bro really said AutoCAD is Canadian dollar 💀
6:58 Migrating and Ancestry is a great subject, for example, I live in central Poland, but my great grandparents lived around the Lviv region, but at the time this was polish land and I think they also were Jewish... then well what should I call myself, A polish with a poli-ukraino-jewish ancestry? It doesn't make too much sense...
You're just a pole. It's not that complicated
The level of migration in Colombia is absurd because we emigrate a lot and we receive a lot of refugees and now we're receiving gentrification from Foreign migrants who abuse the exchange rate.
Love this channel. I was going to up my Patreon, but it jumps from $6 to $20. Could you add a $12 level, hmm... Kabob with a Side?
What side would you like with your kebab? I guess with my kebab
@@ibx2cat Would the cucumber salad be typical? I prefer sweets... maybe baklava? Or what is that sweetened drink?
Or maybe call it "Combo Plate" or "Combo Platter". That time you got a kebab at midnight with all the extras was really fun. Like opening Christmas presents.
In the Zelda stream you got Poke. So you could name a level Poke.
7:22 Correction: Sweden is clearly right there on the top 10 list. Number 8
Yeah I'm not sure its going well for Sweden these days...
@@dj71162 they heard enough Swedenistan memes to finally realize having 20% of your population in Scandinavia coming from Syria maybe isn't that good of an idea
Wow! I didn't know my country of America was that popular! Everyone wants a slice of our capitalism.
Not everyone, generally people from countries that the US destroys
I mean if the USA is going to abuse the entire world we might as well could get a slice of that wealth right?
14:41 " If you wanted to come here just to retire, you'd be a net burden to" Well, there фку people who have worked there whole life in pretty rich countries and move to slightly poorer countries with, say, better climate. Swedes often retire in Spain. This benafits the Spanish economy, because the Swedish seniors are spending foreign money on houses, cars, food etc. in the Spanish economy. They also pay taxes like VAT and property tax
wealthy people are beneficial at any point in their life, the average pensioner is only beneficial because their birth country pays the benefit, not the host country
Someone's forgetting about gentrifrication
@@yomilala8929 made up nonsense
@@froglifes6829 whatever you say buddie
@@yomilala8929 cope
Wow I knew the USA was popular but I didn't know it was such overkill
It's because Europe is, in some aspects more racist and xenophobic.
Americans: "The official term for people from the USA is American".
Latino Countries: "The official term for people from the USA is United Statesian".
ToyCat: "The official term for people from the USA is United Statesians".
i would define a migrant as someone born elsewhere. for example, i am of congolese descent, but born and raised in canada. i have a big attachment to both cultures but i was born here so i feel like my to claim canada is more legitimate. i have lots of friends whose parents immigrated here when they were little who still consider themselves immigrants despite being raised here from a young age.
bigger picture > smooth brain
The funny thing about saying "United Statesian" is that that's what they're called in Spanish ("estadounidense": "estado" = "state", "unido" = "united", -ense = -ian)
Brazilians also do it.
8:13 There is one simple answer to that question: War or power struggles in the middle eastern countries.
Europe has housed millions of people fleeing from Syria's civil war, ISIS, the Taliban, the Kurdish struggles in southern Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, etc, etc.
For example, a few years ago, during the height of the Syrian refugee crisis, Germany said they would accept 1 million extra refugees.
A lot of people don't really know this, but most successful countries in Europe have strict immigration legislation. If you are a so-called "economic refugee", only coming to the country because you want to make a name for yourself, chances are pretty high that you aren't even allowed to live in a northwestern EU country. It's mostly about safety guarantees, not about money.
I'd like for someone to explain to me, how is a person born in a specific country an immigrant to that country? How many generations need to pass in order for someone to be considered native? This is a reference to Sunak
Some people are very racist. That's why they consider them as immigrants
Racism is especially problematic in Asia and Europe
That's actually a good question. Do immigrants need to integrate? Do they need to gain citizenship? Would only their children that are born in the country count?
Many of of the people usually considered migrants or "of migration background" in Europe are in the 2nd or 3rd generation. So people not born outside the country, but still with a distinct cultural identity from their family's origin.
That graph doesn't really work unless the average life expectancy is a hundred years and different decades of your life vary in length....
the brain drain that goes to the us every year is nuts. also I started working at 14. if people wait till they are 24 to start working they wont have shit for work ethic.
Some countries lave laws to regulate work for minors. Also there is school.
*front facing cellphone video in truck cab* ~Hey yall, I just wanna get this off my chest. I don't know about you all but I'm getting a little tired of SOME GROUPS coming over here into MY COUNTRY and speaking MY LANGUAGE and taking away MY CZcams JOBS away from hard working AMERICAN CZcamsRS!!!!
"No one wants those jobs!!!!! Like can you even imagine how terrible it must be being a CZcamsr! Some literally live in abject squalor like Las Vegas."
Honestly I’m surprised the US was that accepting given all I hear about illegal immigration these days.
The right wing in the usa has a fuss over illegal immigrants. They could care less about legal immigrants.
The USA loves cheap labour and many immigrants represent that
Yo ToyCat! One of your best videos so far. Sadly it's a very polemic topic so there's lots of bullshit in the comments section. Anyways, keep it up!
A note that a plurality is not a majority.
Peru, Colombia, Ecuador before 2016: Red
After 2016: Blue
Awesome clear Earth map...... how did you create it??
it's google maps. Google Earth looks even better
@@FSXgta Is it allowed to use Google maps, countries and Google earth on a channel because there will be copyright strike from Google on the channel?
It's free use. Anyone can use it. For anything.
@@CentauriSphere that doesn't look like a Google map then? It is some other software?
0:33 Wow, what a total piece of bullcrap this map is :D
This map is called "Immigrants", while in reality it should be called "Foreign nationals"
If it were really counting "Immigrants", Brazil should also have 55+ million immigrants, but most of them already have a citizenship (because it's way easier to get a citizenship in Argentina, Brazil or Mexico than the USA), so it seems as if the US is the only place with tons of immigrants.
According to migrant and refugee reports in Brazil, produced by the Observatory of International Migrations and released by the Ministry of Justice, around 1.3 million immigrants reside in our country, mainly from Venezuela, Haiti, Bolivia, Colombia and the United States.6. svi 2022.
An estimate of 1.9 million immigrants between 2007 and 2016 and almost 2.2 million if we extend to the year 2000, a little less than 1% of Brazil's total population. ➢ Migrations and security, socioeconomic development and the stability of countries.
I feel good to be 2nd on this list.
Toycat: "united-statian"
Me: instant subscribe
Based
12:37 I would argue that the immigrant that moves over in their early 20s often doesn't know the language and doesn't have the same education, so they tend to do low paying jobs and do rather poor in integrating. The person born in the target country knows the culture from early on and is able to integrate much better.
Otherwise the guest country would have to invest a lot into integration.
funny how he seem to think that is a bad thing if a third wolrd country worker "take advantage" of a country who basically destroyed all tribal cultures on the wolrd and start a era of war, racism and hunger
It is. Human leeches who collect benefits and work for cheap lowering the standard. Look at how in germany the africans/middle eastern people do not respect the womeb and caused a mass increase of sexual harrasmenr and crime.
What tribal culture did germany destroy in the middle east? What trival culture did sweden destroy? denmark? Finland? You dont know history
@@froglifes6829 well, I would need a resesrch to anser you exacly, but I know what belgian did in congo, so im sure german is the same trash
@@froglifes6829 Germany's colonies included Togo, Cameroon, German South-West Africa (present-day Namibia), German East Africa (present-day Tanzania), three territories that are now in Papua New Guinea (Kaiser-Wilhelmsland, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the German Solomon Islands), and several territories in the Pacific: the Marshall ... First google anser
@@froglifes6829 but you are right in 1 thing, I should have said continent instead of country, that I agree
You got one thing really wrong. The person can't just change country, retire there and get the money from the new country. When someone retire and go to another country, they are just taking the money from there own country to spend in another one.
he said two of the most oil filled countries 1:20
Swede here. We have, as stadted, a LOT of imigration. However, most people do not dislike imigrants. Those people certainly exist, but I personally haven't met many, and imigrants make up a lot of the workforce (in just my group at work, which is about 40 people, I have people from libya, finland, iraq, montenegro and serbia).
However, there is one thing most people agree on, no matter their views on imigrants as a whole: we are not able to deal with them in a good way (specifically talking about imigrants who have fled from wars or poorer countries like iraq, somalia etc). The application to become swedish takes way too long, and sometimes people who have lived here for years get kicked out because that's when their aplication was actually denied (almost happened to a classmate of mine a while back, and he already spoke the language fluently). There's simply too much for the state to handle sadly. We also handle them badly afterwards, placing many in the same places as others from their country, which sounds like a good idea, until you realize that makes it way less likely that they actually implement into our society, and a lot of people don't even know swedish after living here foe years.
I clicked this cuz I saw on the thumbnail people move TO western sahara.
1:51
The US numbers are skewered because it's total number of immigrants rather than as a percentage of the population or pr square km or some such.
It's more comparable to look at total immigration into the whole of Europe vs the whole of the US then individual countries.
Just looking at the countries in that list you see that the mentioned EU countries alone matches the US pretty closely, even if you ignore immigration into other European countries.
8:24
The thing is that in Germanic countries when we think of immigrants we tend to think about refugees.
People we believe we have a *duty* to take in for cultural reasons but that often come from countries where they're on average not starting out as well equipped for a modern western economy as we are ourselves.
And there's also a element of racism involved or at least a belief in our own cultural superiority...
10:35
It's scientifically proven that diversity causes a increase in creativity, including a increase in patents generated pr capita.
It's not a *huge* number, but it's definitely there and statistically significant.
2nd point refugees are not immigrants the refugee conventions that were put in place after World War 2 were done so because the people that were affected were from our culture those refugee convention will never meant for anyone other than Europeans and their colonies on top of that allowing so many people to claim refugee status has set up in people's Minds that the way to success is to immigrate to the West instead of finding a way to do it in their Homelands which would benefit not only themselves but everybody else that lives there.
3rd
Diversity definitely helps with creativity and it stimulates economic performance, but only in the correct proportions.
When too many immigrants come all at once, they don't assimilate and instead turn against the native culture, especially when those immigrants aren't fully employed and leading productive lives.
Yup, measured on the population germany has more emigration than the US. Less total people, but a bigger part of the population. At least according to that data.
>belief in our own cultural superiority
When their culture is about beheading teachers for drawing their prophet, it's not very hard to beat
Yea but Germany is including other eastern European countries like the Balkins. If you're counting the EU as a whole, you can't count people from other EU member states.
@@Joker-no1uh Yes and no, the point here is if a location in a place in the US is likely to have more foreigners then a location in Europe.
When you're looking at numbers for the whole of the US it's similar to looking at the whole of Europe, except that someone from a different US state isn't a foreigner, while someone from another European country is sometimes more different from another European country then a American is from a Indian (both likely speaks a Indo-European language, and likely have a shared Greco-Roman cultural and philosophical heritage due to Alexander the great and the exchange of cultural ideas during his life and afterwards.
Something that isn't necessarily the case for all Europeans).
Americans gets too hung up with skin colour and fails to realize that other white people in Europe sometimes are as different or even are more different then people on other continents with a different skin colour.
We're a *highly* diverse continent.
Meaning that to get a accurate view of how many immigrants we have, how many foreigners we have you need to scale it down to country level where comparing with the whole USA is unfair and comparing with individual states is more accurate.
And where yes, migration within Europe *is* relevant.
We might look more homogenous because more of us are white, but that's very much a illusion.
do you have personalized ads turned on?
I'm trying to analyze your psychology here through what ads u get (jk)
Wtf lol
Nice pfp. 🐶
Doesn't Moscow still have the most billionaires?
When you have very strong social security systems and very high unemployment among immigrants they are of course a drain on a country’s economy. Think most people have a problem with people coming to a country and not contributing. There’s of course also cultural issues, people generally have a higher acceptance of people with similar cultural values. The country’s now mostly negative (that formerly were positive) have issues like this. We do have a need of more young people in a lot of countries because of aging populations and low birth rates, but I think you do need to be more restrictive on uneducated immigrants that risk being a burden, instead an asset to your society.
I think a more realistic scenario for immigrants in Finland is that a whole family immigrates here from a poorer country, with the man working as a food delivery driver. Meanwhile the family collects unemployment and child care benefits etc. and uses the Finnish school system to educate their children, who will then move to a richer country to work in. Or the children don't do well in school and have trouble integrating into Finnish society, and cause trouble for others. Exceptions do exist, of course.
If they're already in Finland, what richer country could they hope to move to? The US, with no social benefits? Germany, with a worse education system?
those are called human leeches
For a country like USA it is beneficial to have immigrants as there is barely any social security so it doesnt really cost anything to get new low income people as tax payers.
For a country like Sweden, Finland or Norway, it is very much not beneficial to have those same kind of people since the government pays and helps those people so much more, it will take forever to make a profit on those human resources... And that is just what people are at the end of the day, resources.
Not Japan that’s for sure
Interesting vid, mate. I have to question the poll on how citizens view immigration though. I've seen recent polls in the uk that show even leftists think there is too much immigration and most people are angry about the boat invaders which are costing the taxpayer billions a year to house in hotels. They even get special privileges like free dental care with uk citizens have to pay for. These majority 18-40 year old men(economic migrants) are causing a lot of resentment.
18:08 I live for these worlds, babys are hella ugly
babies are just potatoes with eyes and feet
King Charles' dad is Greek, isn't he?
Sort of. The Royals only married themselves until the late 20th century so they are all inbred with ancestors from across Europe but predominantly from the small states that are now part of Germany.
he was from the Greek Royal Family back when Greece had a Monarchy, but they were not Greek. Like much of the royalty in Europe, it was German Ancestry
@@A.Martin Wasn't he born in Greece, though?
@@A.Martin that's right, Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth were related even before they got married. Both of them are direct descendants of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. The House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha is very wide and influential.
2:50 russian shill moment
Different views obviously are influence by where migrants come from and why they move over.
New Zealand 🇳🇿 has alot....
If you consider all of Europe together, it's way over 55 million
Why would you do that?
We are comparing countries not continents
@@yomilala8929 because migrants are trying to get into the EU.
However the immigrant figure for specific European countries includes immigrants from other European countries so for Europe as a whole, you have to subtract that which is most immigrants in Europe
@@thomasgrabkowski8283 If you have an EU passport you can move freely within the EU.
My man, this reminded me, here in croatia, three dats ago, on wendesday i think, a bunch of burundi teens went missing in the city of rijeka, it's a world champiobship in handball here in four cities for players age 19 and less, so the burundi team played one match and then ten of them went missing, i suspected why, but that 735 dollars a year leaves no question.
As for the immigration alone, the thing is that we don't consider other eu citizens as immigration, and there's plenty of them, but also we don't make it easy for third countries, like the british, yanks or aussies as well as asians or africans, you can buy a property, buy a house or a flat, you still have to be out of the country after 90 days, and then you can stay another 90 in that year, you need a work permit and secured job here, or founding a company with at least three local employees to grant you a residency, not if you are an eu citizen tho.
But none the less each year we have more and more workers imported from nepal, philipines, bangladesh, it started with tourism and services, but more and more i see them inland working in industry, ofc we employ a lot if bosnians, serbs and macedonians too, also albanians, but for years those markets are not enough, and that workforce is mostly seasonal.
On the other hand the outer borders as they are the eu outer borders are heavily guarded for many years, we had to prove we can do it to be accepted into the schengen zone.
So those numbers are far from accurate because they leave out entire groups of people, likewise that n.macedonian numbers are utter bollocks because macedonia, serbia and that entire group of countries are full of illegal migrants, like full to the brim because they are easy to enter fir them, having no visa requirement for a lot of countries, but difficult to exit thru croatia or hungary, but you don't see that in your numbers because they are not registerd at all or not as immigrants but refugees or illegals or something.
Saudi Arabia made sense, cuz it is the center of Islam. As an ex-Muslim kiddo back then, I fantasize of moving to Saudi, wanting to explore places I only hear in Islamic classes. So it made sense to me
I don't think the lack of acceptance of inmigration in europe is a economic thing, but a social one, like culture, crime...
Popular opinion reflects reality (to an extent). In the US, immigrants are more economically productive than the native-born-in Germany, much less. Half of all users of German public unemployment insurance (job seekers money) don't have German citizenship. People notice these things.
That has more to do with government social programs. If the US offered those benefits to immigrants, they would take the free money too.
First
Edit: Why am I doing this?
The true First
There is 10 Million syrians in Turkey most pf thrm csmr to country by illegally
I think a lot of the data you show is hella sus. You should put the links of the references on the video's description so that people can verify your data. It's not that I am accusing you of deliberately showing false information, just that your sources may not be the best possible ones.
Very edgy comment section, I have to say. How many people have actual real life expieriences and how many just get brainmelted online?
real life experiences of what now?
experience with immigration or experience with immigrants?
turkey has an insane migrant problem, so this map doesnt exactly do it justice
granted i didnt watch the video yet
Turkey has a lot of immigrants but not as big a lot as other places
Well still think that is far better to come to live in macedonia or serbia ,croatia that moust of countries in Africa or Asia....
Actually, your Peruvian between the ages of 21 and 66.
Toycat, I think you misunderstood the statistics about Russia. It shows people with CITIZENSHIP of other countries eg. Georgia, Kazakhstan etc. migrated to Russia. People who migrated during Soviet times and lived in Russia about 1991-1992 got Russian citizenship automatically. They are NOT migrants in a legal sense. On the other hand, people who come from former-USSR countries to Russia today are foreigners, and the statistics indicate only this group. Side note: the statistics does not take in to account their ETHNICITY. Some people are from the ethnically Russian diaspora. Most Kazakhstani citizens are, of course, ethnically Kazakh, but many aren't.
I would choose USA too
I too enjoy being shot at and losing my life savings, house and all possessions because of illness.
@@lollertoaster Every country has some disadvantages but that doesn't change the fact that according to those statistics from this video most of people want to move in there, including me.
lollertoaster is either from the US or is steeped in US media. Americans: THIS IS THE WORST COUNTRY EVER. Everyone from every other country in the history of time: Damn, that's a really great country!
America had many economic opportunities but really expensive. Especially large cities.
You can't get a full picture of a country just from memes. For most people, it's great. But of course every country has its problems.
Immigrants have a lot to gain. From low standards of living and low wage to a high standard living and a decent/high wage. The economic contributions made by immigrants is just a byproduct of their ambitions. Socially, It's understandable why some people may view it negatively, mainly refugees. They're typically unwilling to adapt to the country, specifically mannerisms resulting in a small amount of goonery. People really need to take notes from the saying "When in Rome, do as the Romans do". Westerners too are guilty of this. They're notorious for their goonery while abroad.
United Statesian just feels awful. And if we have to use that. Let's call UK citizens -> United Kingdomians.
Plus if it's the rest of the Americas that have a problem with "American" then all 35 nations can refer to themselves as "Americasian"
We ought to call ourselves Washingtonians and then those in D.C. can call themselves Capitolites and those in Washington state call themselves Washingtonites
Nonsense
No. US American for an alternative. United Statesian is terrible, and foreigners will be ignored from hereon.
@Grote Scheiße actually no. I don't even know what we call people from my state
I know, it’s horrible. No one is going to use that. People need to get over it.
@Grote Scheiße Maybe some people do that if you’re talking to other Americans from the region. But they’d never refer to themselves as that internationally. They’d always say Americans & then just say what state they’re from.
Instead of United Statians i think it's way better to say US Americans, much clearer, much closer to the typical fashion, much shorter, and just better sounding.
Saying this as someone from Argentina.
Terrible channel, I never watch it all the time. Lol
Honestly, I really enjoy your analysis of geography statistics, pretty interesting to consider most immigrants come after high school and leave to retire rich in their home country. Does immigration lift all boats? Probably?
People moving TO California
^funniest joke in the video
saudi arabia has now the ''Premium Residency''
search about it and i see a lot got it now which is actually u become a ''citizen''
The US, UK and Canada, Australia has migration of well educated people looking for high paying wages. Germany mostly has migration from sh.hole countries in Africa and Middle East who are attracted by extremely high welfare and don’t care for the country and its people or rules. Without having worked one hour or learning our language you still can have an apartment, food, pocketmoney, electricity, heat, internet, healthcare all completely for free / paid by taxpayers without a time limit. Having multiple children ups your income. That’s why Germans are not the biggest fans of migrations. It’s a bad deal but anyone who criticizes is, is called a Nazi. That sword is still quite sharp over here.
Same issue in France. There are very different types of immigrants and Canada tends to get skilled working immigrants and many European countries opportunists who want to benefit from our wealth and causes more problems than good. And there is also the Islam/civilization problem.
Right!
@@Rayver09 Exactly!
Most immigrants in the USA are from Mexico and Central America. And trust me, they're are usually the least educated. But still they assimilate pretty great in the USA.
Why?
Because many americans employ them.
Giving jobs to immigrants is the best way to accomplish assimilation
@@yomilala8929 no they assimilate because they are from the same civilization (Christians speaking an European language).
The Muslims are from a different civilization and don’t assimilate very well in general. Their mindset is quite different mostly because of their religion which is in many ways incompatible with western way of life.
Asians are also from a different civilization but in general assimilate quite well as they have a culture of hard work and respect (broadly speaking), and religion doesn’t take too much space.
good video, even though i disagree, immigration needs to be halted for at least 10years.
Why?
@@yomilala8929lots of crime and they're clearly not integrating