Buy courses here: www.academic-a... Sub to my substack here: substack.com/p... Join the channel here: / @academicagent All my vital links: unpopular.acad...
Stephen Fry is another example of this duality. He talks about his Catholic upbringing when he’s attacking Christianity and plays up his Jewish heritage when he wants people to feel sorry for him. Absolute weasel
He's awful. He was literally against Thatcher for the sole reason that he didn't want lower class people having any power or opportunity. Something along the lines of "you can't let some barrow boys run the country". He is a massive snob.
Anyone notice how much posts are getting deleted on this topic? Fry was one of the only people who disliked Thatcher because he only thought the Upper Class should rule Britain. He was quite open about it too.
My favourite twitter spat with Baddiel was when I was talking about how Jews are an ethnity and I pointed out that there are a lot of atheist Jews, *obviously* referring to Baddiel himself, and he retweeted me saying "Erm, does anyone want to tell him?" The mendacity is in his blood. It's the default mode in all situations. The dishonesty is hardwired. Literally incapable of being honest.
I'm a Pole. We've been through it before (800 years, we really have been through it all). That's why we call a wind-tale thingy on a sailboat a ((characteristic)) name. It swings wherever the wind blows, just like Schwimmer and such like.
I called out Baddiel a few years ago and got dog-piled as a result. He was banging on about how Brexiteers were stupid because all Brexit was about, he claimed, was the colour of their passport. The gammons wanted a "blue" passport. I asked him what the colour of the Israeli passport is. (Blue, as it happens.) He responded by calling me an anti-semite. To his credit, he didn't block me, so there's that, I suppose.
I've had several twitter spats woth Baddiel over the years. He's that perfect mix of mendacity and stupidity. He'll pretend not to understand you on one issue, then he'll ACTUALLY not understand you on another. It's like arguing with a cat.
Had a back and forth with Baddiel and Aaronovitch regarding their peoples leading role in forced multiracialism with political motive (revenge). I linked several Rabbis talking about it very frankly & several of his followers were like “well David this is pretty interesting”. BLOCKED Lmao, they cannot take intelligent argument.
Due to gag presents over the years, I've read several William Shatner autobiographies. His latest (cowritten with someone) was suddenly FILLED with Yiddish phrases and talking about his religion. When celebrities' careers go, they get older, they may just find religion and concern for their own group more interesting. Baddiel and Schwimmer are both long past their glory years, this is something they can get attention for.
Loyalty to political groups, general theories, political ideologies or even nation states are secondary only to loyalty to one’s own people, religion, family and bloodline. En français : « un secret de polichinelle » or a secret that everybody knows. 250 years of propositional nation states have not been able to eradicate that fundamental human identity. What we are witnessing here with the Davids is their instinctual rediscovery of an old truth masked by western liberalism. It isn’t « luxury belief », it’s survival hierarchy.
This is the strange irony of it all. We live in incredibly tolerant times, and yet blokes with personality diss orders like that are willing to risk it all for the sake of spouting off on the internet.
Goebbels was a reactionary. Lost to history - loudly, at least - is the specific reactions to what? Rappapport is Rosa Luxembourg yelling at the other end of the beer hall, which is what made the people turn to the Austrian painter.
There were more than enough Rappaports at the time for the Germans to notice. They were noticing a long time before Goebbels came along. They noticed during the German Civil War. They noticed the anti German/antiWest rhetoric broadcast by Weiss and Samuel Untermeyer. They noticed during the hyperinflation and during the Weimar degeneracy. Goebbels only noticed that the Germans were noticing.
The amount of time and energy wasted on this group of psychopaths is infuriating. Mutilation of babies induces psychological trauma no matter how they spin it. Rapaports rant is one of the most important ever captured, it can only make sense through a particularly unflattering lens. If anyone in the U.K. actually elucidated in detail what he was hinting(correctly) at you run the risk of arrest.
If you go looking them up in the UK you will find that 75% of them vote according to how the party views a country which over 90% of them have at some point lived in, worked in or visited. Their definition of AS includes any criticism of a family of the initial R and an individual with the initials GS.
I've seen others of this type do exactly the same thing. Promote anti white rhetoric under the guise of being white. I remember seeing a Morgan Freeman interview and the guy interviewing him was trying to get Morgan to talk about white privileged and black disadvantage, and when Morgan put him on the spot his story changed and he was no longer white and professing that he was yewish. Iused to like Newman and Baddel. Sham about Baddel though. I went off him a good while back because of the sort of stuff he comes out with nowadays.
Not to be a stick in the mud, but being fluent in Woke-ese, I believe there is a way that Schwimmer's apparently contrary identities can actually both exist at once. "White privilege" is about appearing to be white to others. It does not actually require being white, or 'feeling' white. His later assertion that he did not feel white, is about the inner self. This is also how a transwoman can be a woman but also have male privilege. Not my opinion; just my analysis of the mind of mid wits.
In other words, when hwhyt-ness was displayed as a low status way to identify, this understandably leads to most ambitious and socially-aware people being quite happy to distance themselves from it. Despite the fact that what they're turning against is an immutable characteristic. "Well, yeah, but I'm not like THAT." So far, there has been an acceptance of a dual meaning or second element, one that you can reject, and are encouraged to do so.
They cant produce 150 IQs anywhere near the rates as euros because of all the inbreeding. Nvm the shoddy studies they use to claim 115 medians when its cherry picked data from 12 year olds.. 🙄
The power of being the minority is that there is favouritism in the West as it now stands, on weakening limbs, for the outgroup preference. Overrepresentation, favouritisation, social status boons and social mobility advantages, are conveyed onto the minority. The power of being the native majority _used_ to mean that you could be properly represented in the fair and logical manner, and be given a level of respect which befit the nature of you belonging to that land. Now, in England at least, it is completely topsy-turvy. The government _bitterly resents_ the very existence of the old majority natives, and ingroup preference is shunned in favour of the endless congratulatory atmosphere generated around the outgroups from various, relatively recent generations. The normalisation of English folk becoming suddenly equivocal over so-called 'tolerance' and 'inclusion', has made many of our own people our own worst enemies. We are completely riven as it stands, in a way in which we never truly were in the past. Even during the times of the Anglo-Saxon Heptarchy pre-Unification of England, the comparatively smaller, pettier kingdoms (or which there were primarily seven, though technically more), there'd be many recurring themes. In spite of the lands which became England, back then, still having yet to coalesce under one banner, the peoples living in them were pretty much variations on a theme. There were important cultural differences, though they were largely of very much related stock. They fought each other, yes, though knew they were at odds or making friends with highly similar neighbours. Inevitably, the outgroup preference going on in the 21st century, so jarringly far removed from say, the 7th or 8th centuries AD, means that we are left with the question, "How did this happen to us?", when we historically know for a fact how long the English had largely remained intact as a group. Mass migration from beyond the shores of England is a relatively new thing. Of course, there'll always be smart-arses quick to falsely quip through smug expressions and grinning teeth, about England being made by interlopers from the time after the Fall of the Western Roman Empire. There will always be the contrarian waiting in the wings to try and draw a false equivalence between migrants whom have literally just arrived here this year, or say, since 2015 at least, and those whose ties to the land will have existed since at least the 10th century AD, and possibly as far back as the 5th century AD for some. The idea of us being a nation of 'immigrants' has been liberally used, to try and figuratively smack patriots and nationalists over the head for years already. It's a disgrace, of course. And the contrarian will believe they are correct, smugly handwaving away 1,600 years of Anglo-Saxon history as though it meant nothing to England. The power of being the minority in a Western nation in 2024, is that they know they are going to be granted a range of privileges. A random woman can start screeching about patriarchy in a casual meeting, and not be considered mentally unstable, by those around her, even though doing that is obviously her own radicalisation on display. The kind of toxic echo chambers such people exist in 24/7 on social media like Twitter/X, is what further deepens their sickness, from what I can tell. They begin to act like they do in their little echo chambers and ivory towers online, in the real-world. And so the madness ensues, with people desperate to turn their play-pretend palaces of the mind, into the new terra firma of reality. And it is never going to be sane. The power of being the minority is so often the sword, while the power of acting like the only majority, is the shield. It suites the bad faith actor interloper, to try and say, 'hello my fellow Brits', while hiding behind the undeserved attempt to call themselves a Briton. But then, out of nowhere, without anyone having been asked or given respect at any point at all, the same interloper can switch back to wanting to melt into the crowd, and to be considered integrated. The Cuckoo Bird analogy comes to mind. The fat, greedy interloper, sat in the nest of the host bird, being spoilt rotten as the original hatchlings perish via starvation or literal suffocation under the Cuckoo bird chick - which eventually becomes so large it is bigger than the adult aged birds hosting it erroneously. The Cuckoo Bird continue to trick them by mimicking the calls of whichever victim species it is getting a free ride out of. Then it might even stay there long enough for starvation to become likely _for the parents_ if it carries on. Then, either something gives and it is forced out or it flies away. Parasitic behaviour. Yet the Cuckoo Bird got everything it wanted and grew big and strong. The species of the host victim birds, gains nothing.
You know they will organize their own 'fake opposition' long before anyone else gets a chance, right? It has happened many times before. Can you guess when?
Hypothetically speaking, if you inject a phrase like "they/we don't count" in to the collective imagination, it's not hard to see how that may result in some people passed over and avoiding the worst of what can be doled out during times of strife and/or collapse.
Get any DVD out your collection, skip to the end credits and read the names of the writers, technical staff etc..... and tell my J's are under represented
Their entire suggested premise is ethically absurd: _"Hey! You over there! You should feel bad and guilty about whatever advance you are able to obtain for yourself and for those most like you. Advance for you is inherently unethical."_ _"Me on the other hand. I should embrace whatever advance I can get for myself and for those most like me. Because I am good, and you are bad (because you are not me). Furthermore, you should be happy for my advance because it proves that I am good and that my advance is ethical. If not, it further demonstrates that you are bad"._ No wonder they are always smirking.
This is how everyone thinks, get over it. Nobody wants to compete anymore and weak and greedy people like the ones you described have always existed. There are those who look for advancement in any area while at the same time not necessarily wanting to stop the advancement of others. I WANT people to be on my level. Maybe then, I would have some competition. I’ve only met one person like that in my life.
Theres a very subtle way for it to make sense in some messed up way: "I never felt white growing up because im jewish" is him knowing hes jewish, acting jewish and associating with that. but then he tries to intelectualize his success with "i was only successful because others viewed me as white heterosexual" Its a wheasly but that is the ironman statement id say
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do." Emerson
This comments section might remember this. In an introduction to one James Lindsay's books he made it explicit that the purpose of the book was defend a form liberalism, inclusion, the protection of women and minorities. Does anyone recall what book that was? I remember seeing a picture or video of someone showing it.
There is an interpretation which is consistent. Feeling white is internal, whereas the “privilege” one receives for being a white male is dependent on how others perceive you. Why he never felt white isn’t evident in the title of the article (maybe the article makes it clear). But he could have never felt white for internal reasons (like not going to church) and not because of how others perceived him.
Maybe it's to do with not being or feeling, fully European, a civilisation built upon Christianity following the fall of the Roman Empire. People are more than just a skin colour.
Being white is a mindset. A mindset that centers around honor, truth, and responsibility. I know a lot of whites who run away from those things and therefore are more like semites. I used to view them as liberals but now I don’t see much difference between being a liberal and a Semite. 🤠
That feeling is more likely to caused by having a strong group identity in the first place, rather than not being able to get along with the wider society. It's framed the wrong way around. Is hwhyt society less accepting of others, than David's group is to integration?
The article states that 50% of the main characters in Friends are Jewish. Obviously two are Ross and Monica, but who's the other one supposed to be? Rachel? Chandler?
Eastern Europeans - Germans, Russians and Poles, mostly - have had their reputations as a people smeared tangentially when their uninvited visitors took their names but kept behaving like THEM. To understand it, think about all the killers in the states with Anglo names - like Jabari Smith and Demarcus Pope - arrested with their pants sagging. They aim to obliterate your associations even to the sanctity of your name. Or like “Rachel Green(e).”
I'm a man without conviction? I'm a man who doesn't know How to sell a contradiction? You come and go, you come and go Karma, karma, karma, karma, karma chameleon You come and go, you come and go
7:32 I've been saying this for several years; after successfully ignoring politics for most of my life (even after moving to Los Angeles), Orange Man happened & it took about 3 seconds to see this duplicitous pattern emerging across social media. I didn't exactly need help from the dissident right to conclude that the biggest threat to Western Jewry (especially in the US) was the Radical Left and their unrelenting desire to deconstruct systems of power. Given the scope of the system being discussed, I'd be hiding too. lmao
2 - they can be reconciled, in that in spite of him knowing he’s white, he doesn’t feel it. Yet, it seems implausible for the same person to hold both of these positions. Which is your actual point (I think).
We can pretty easily harmonize these two statements. He said he understood his privilege now, he never said anything about understanding privilege in his childhood. On the other hand, the quoye you gave about him not feeling white was an explicit reference to childhood. So, if we wish, we could say that he didn't feel white as a kid, but later learned of his privilege. Of course, I don't believe this for a moment. I believe that the way we think of ourselves happens in terms of narrative. We tell ourselves a story about who we are. And i think that, while these two quotes could be reconciled in a single narrative, i believe they actually speak to two different narratives he told about himself at two different times
Stephen Fry is another example of this duality. He talks about his Catholic upbringing when he’s attacking Christianity and plays up his Jewish heritage when he wants people to feel sorry for him. Absolute weasel
@HalideHelixhe does it often.
It’s because of his anal fixation.
There was a black “Friends.” It was called “Sisters” (I think) and was produced by Kelsey Grammar.
He's awful.
He was literally against Thatcher for the sole reason that he didn't want lower class people having any power or opportunity.
Something along the lines of "you can't let some barrow boys run the country".
He is a massive snob.
Anyone notice how much posts are getting deleted on this topic?
Fry was one of the only people who disliked Thatcher because he only thought the Upper Class should rule Britain.
He was quite open about it too.
It's great to see David Schwimmer finally come out of the tunnel.
😂
Tunnel jokes will never get filled in
They're really grate to laugh at!
Critical theories, hey? This is what happens when you have tunnel vision.
LOHL
It’s almost like they’re sneaky liars or something.
We call them shapeshifters for a reason.
They actually mirror genestealer cults from 40k perfectly, it's kinda funny
The German word is Doppleganger, same meaning
My favourite twitter spat with Baddiel was when I was talking about how Jews are an ethnity and I pointed out that there are a lot of atheist Jews, *obviously* referring to Baddiel himself, and he retweeted me saying "Erm, does anyone want to tell him?"
The mendacity is in his blood. It's the default mode in all situations.
The dishonesty is hardwired. Literally incapable of being honest.
Correct.
They’re Cluster B. They’re genetically psychopaths. Almost all of them.
That’s what we notice, BTW. Semitism = psychopathy.
Yes, and they defend it as a survival strategy. Even as it corrodes our societies.
@HalideHelix Because it is.
Ethno-religious group.
“An ethnicity that flys under the banner of a religion”
"unsympathetically stereotyped is a more specifically Sarah Silverman problem" 😂
I'm a Pole. We've been through it before (800 years, we really have been through it all). That's why we call a wind-tale thingy on a sailboat a ((characteristic)) name. It swings wherever the wind blows, just like Schwimmer and such like.
Tell tail?
Tattle tail?
Of course the J’s would peel off the white train as it gets close to the cliff. This is called having a strategy and an objective.
When the planes going down, mind who packed parachutes
@@KittSpiken never mind that, mind who sabotaged the plane in the first place.
Js are trying to get off the ⬜️ train but it looks like the POCs have managed to lock the doors from the outside. Oopsie!
@@jandavidson7093 Probably someone with a parachute😐
I can’t wait for the ‘Academic Agent _Noticing_ Retrospective’
Noticing increasingly seems to become illegal and not just on these subjects.
I agree with Swimmer about the need for a black Friends. There should also be a white one.
It’d be hilarious!
LOL
Black sitcoms are ten a penny.
See Himym
No, what a stupid idea. That would be playing into the stereotypes assigned to you by your enemies.
I called out Baddiel a few years ago and got dog-piled as a result. He was banging on about how Brexiteers were stupid because all Brexit was about, he claimed, was the colour of their passport. The gammons wanted a "blue" passport. I asked him what the colour of the Israeli passport is. (Blue, as it happens.) He responded by calling me an anti-semite. To his credit, he didn't block me, so there's that, I suppose.
I've had several twitter spats woth Baddiel over the years. He's that perfect mix of mendacity and stupidity.
He'll pretend not to understand you on one issue, then he'll ACTUALLY not understand you on another. It's like arguing with a cat.
"Das wacist!"
Had a back and forth with Baddiel and Aaronovitch regarding their peoples leading role in forced multiracialism with political motive (revenge). I linked several Rabbis talking about it very frankly & several of his followers were like “well David this is pretty interesting”.
BLOCKED Lmao, they cannot take intelligent argument.
Nice one AA, the mental gymnastics you require to understand these people is beyond belief!
It’s exhausting
It’s wild, this dude many many years wrote a book about these mental gymnastics.
@@jmfm0911was the book a struggle for him?? To write, I mean?
@@hammersandcaffeinepills A “kampf, as it were. Less than irony.
@@NoahBodze truly, a "kampf" all his own!
Group identity is becoming more important, this will ultimately be a positive. The idea of being colourblind and ignoring certain realities is over.
My fellow White people, we as White people must...
_"...embrace (((our))) replacement..."_
Form a collective, and start advocating for our own group
Hard to imagine a more "ethnic" looking pair of people.
Due to gag presents over the years, I've read several William Shatner autobiographies. His latest (cowritten with someone) was suddenly FILLED with Yiddish phrases and talking about his religion. When celebrities' careers go, they get older, they may just find religion and concern for their own group more interesting. Baddiel and Schwimmer are both long past their glory years, this is something they can get attention for.
I believe there is an English historian that noted how J s become more bigoted as they age.
So true
@@thebri2000 That rings true. Do you remember his name, by any chance?
Contact the writer Steve Sailer and ask him... he first brought this quote to my attention. @@Peter-ov6xh
It also has a lot to do with the collapse of esteem and authority enjoyed by the postwar hegemonic culture that has happened with the internet.
"You don't need a formal conspiracy when interests converge" - George Carlin (Rufus)
But it's nice to have one too
Loyalty to political groups, general theories, political ideologies or even nation states are secondary only to loyalty to one’s own people, religion, family and bloodline. En français : « un secret de polichinelle » or a secret that everybody knows. 250 years of propositional nation states have not been able to eradicate that fundamental human identity. What we are witnessing here with the Davids is their instinctual rediscovery of an old truth masked by western liberalism. It isn’t « luxury belief », it’s survival hierarchy.
Michael Rappaport would've been very useful propaganda for Goebbels had he been alive back then
This is the strange irony of it all. We live in incredibly tolerant times, and yet blokes with personality diss orders like that are willing to risk it all for the sake of spouting off on the internet.
Goebbels was a reactionary.
Lost to history - loudly, at least - is the specific reactions to what?
Rappapport is Rosa Luxembourg yelling at the other end of the beer hall, which is what made the people turn to the Austrian painter.
There were more than enough Rappaports at the time for the Germans to notice. They were noticing a long time before Goebbels came along. They noticed during the German Civil War. They noticed the anti German/antiWest rhetoric broadcast by Weiss and Samuel Untermeyer. They noticed during the hyperinflation and during the Weimar degeneracy. Goebbels only noticed that the Germans were noticing.
Not that I’m noticing, but one seems to observe many similarities reminiscent of the midcentury only in reverse.
Wow, David Schwimmer is heterosexual??
Just adds to his internal confusion doesn’t it. 😂
Came here to say this! 😂
His wife is English.
Only when it's in his interests
this is still up for debate
As the star of Hollywood wains, another star arises.
Let me guess, a six pointed one?
Clever! Great double entendre!
Marlon Wayons?
He's pretty consistent... both positions are ant!whyte.
The amount of time and energy wasted on this group of psychopaths is infuriating. Mutilation of babies induces psychological trauma no matter how they spin it. Rapaports rant is one of the most important ever captured, it can only make sense through a particularly unflattering lens. If anyone in the U.K. actually elucidated in detail what he was hinting(correctly) at you run the risk of arrest.
The psych angle is definitely important here. It's hard not to see that speech to camera as little more than NPD.
Unironic the rhetoric and actions seem strangely reminiscent of the mid century, but is suspect that would be noticing and ergo a trope.
If you go looking them up in the UK you will find that 75% of them vote according to how the party views a country which over 90% of them have at some point lived in, worked in or visited. Their definition of AS includes any criticism of a family of the initial R and an individual with the initials GS.
Schwimmer adopts a position depending on which passport he's carrying that day.
If someone were to sketch a portrait of Baddiel, it would be taken by most to be an offensive caricature.
Yasser Arafat could have been his Dad looks wise too.
Thank you for everything you are doing for our people. Anyone calling you "brown" only discredits themself
David Baddiel: the Andrew Ridgely of comedy.
😅
I've seen others of this type do exactly the same thing. Promote anti white rhetoric under the guise of being white. I remember seeing a Morgan Freeman interview and the guy interviewing him was trying to get Morgan to talk about white privileged and black disadvantage, and when Morgan put him on the spot his story changed and he was no longer white and professing that he was yewish. Iused to like Newman and Baddel. Sham about Baddel though. I went off him a good while back because of the sort of stuff he comes out with nowadays.
I really notice their odd shaped faces/heads now
They have a very sinister look
Not to be a stick in the mud, but being fluent in Woke-ese, I believe there is a way that Schwimmer's apparently contrary identities can actually both exist at once.
"White privilege" is about appearing to be white to others. It does not actually require being white, or 'feeling' white.
His later assertion that he did not feel white, is about the inner self.
This is also how a transwoman can be a woman but also have male privilege.
Not my opinion; just my analysis of the mind of mid wits.
the 'Hello fellow whites' meme
Po is 100% on their thought patterns. See "white passing"
The doublespeak may have a logic but it's intended to lose the duality over time, with tthe new meaning/interpretation replacing the old one.
In other words, when hwhyt-ness was displayed as a low status way to identify, this understandably leads to most ambitious and socially-aware people being quite happy to distance themselves from it. Despite the fact that what they're turning against is an immutable characteristic. "Well, yeah, but I'm not like THAT." So far, there has been an acceptance of a dual meaning or second element, one that you can reject, and are encouraged to do so.
Bless Pos “goyish kopf”
if AA had just 3 more IQ points he would understand these 150 IQ strategies :D
They cant produce 150 IQs anywhere near the rates as euros because of all the inbreeding. Nvm the shoddy studies they use to claim 115 medians when its cherry picked data from 12 year olds.. 🙄
The power of being the minority is that there is favouritism in the West as it now stands, on weakening limbs, for the outgroup preference. Overrepresentation, favouritisation, social status boons and social mobility advantages, are conveyed onto the minority. The power of being the native majority _used_ to mean that you could be properly represented in the fair and logical manner, and be given a level of respect which befit the nature of you belonging to that land. Now, in England at least, it is completely topsy-turvy.
The government _bitterly resents_ the very existence of the old majority natives, and ingroup preference is shunned in favour of the endless congratulatory atmosphere generated around the outgroups from various, relatively recent generations. The normalisation of English folk becoming suddenly equivocal over so-called 'tolerance' and 'inclusion', has made many of our own people our own worst enemies. We are completely riven as it stands, in a way in which we never truly were in the past.
Even during the times of the Anglo-Saxon Heptarchy pre-Unification of England, the comparatively smaller, pettier kingdoms (or which there were primarily seven, though technically more), there'd be many recurring themes. In spite of the lands which became England, back then, still having yet to coalesce under one banner, the peoples living in them were pretty much variations on a theme. There were important cultural differences, though they were largely of very much related stock. They fought each other, yes, though knew they were at odds or making friends with highly similar neighbours.
Inevitably, the outgroup preference going on in the 21st century, so jarringly far removed from say, the 7th or 8th centuries AD, means that we are left with the question, "How did this happen to us?", when we historically know for a fact how long the English had largely remained intact as a group. Mass migration from beyond the shores of England is a relatively new thing. Of course, there'll always be smart-arses quick to falsely quip through smug expressions and grinning teeth, about England being made by interlopers from the time after the Fall of the Western Roman Empire.
There will always be the contrarian waiting in the wings to try and draw a false equivalence between migrants whom have literally just arrived here this year, or say, since 2015 at least, and those whose ties to the land will have existed since at least the 10th century AD, and possibly as far back as the 5th century AD for some. The idea of us being a nation of 'immigrants' has been liberally used, to try and figuratively smack patriots and nationalists over the head for years already. It's a disgrace, of course. And the contrarian will believe they are correct, smugly handwaving away 1,600 years of Anglo-Saxon history as though it meant nothing to England.
The power of being the minority in a Western nation in 2024, is that they know they are going to be granted a range of privileges. A random woman can start screeching about patriarchy in a casual meeting, and not be considered mentally unstable, by those around her, even though doing that is obviously her own radicalisation on display. The kind of toxic echo chambers such people exist in 24/7 on social media like Twitter/X, is what further deepens their sickness, from what I can tell. They begin to act like they do in their little echo chambers and ivory towers online, in the real-world. And so the madness ensues, with people desperate to turn their play-pretend palaces of the mind, into the new terra firma of reality. And it is never going to be sane.
The power of being the minority is so often the sword, while the power of acting like the only majority, is the shield. It suites the bad faith actor interloper, to try and say, 'hello my fellow Brits', while hiding behind the undeserved attempt to call themselves a Briton. But then, out of nowhere, without anyone having been asked or given respect at any point at all, the same interloper can switch back to wanting to melt into the crowd, and to be considered integrated.
The Cuckoo Bird analogy comes to mind. The fat, greedy interloper, sat in the nest of the host bird, being spoilt rotten as the original hatchlings perish via starvation or literal suffocation under the Cuckoo bird chick - which eventually becomes so large it is bigger than the adult aged birds hosting it erroneously. The Cuckoo Bird continue to trick them by mimicking the calls of whichever victim species it is getting a free ride out of. Then it might even stay there long enough for starvation to become likely _for the parents_ if it carries on. Then, either something gives and it is forced out or it flies away. Parasitic behaviour. Yet the Cuckoo Bird got everything it wanted and grew big and strong. The species of the host victim birds, gains nothing.
nobody told me js were gonna be this way.
but then i read a book by good ol uncle A.
You know they will organize their own 'fake opposition' long before anyone else gets a chance, right? It has happened many times before. Can you guess when?
It’s simple, heads I win, tails you lose.
Band of Brothers was truly epic, I belief the standout performance came naturally.
Convenience Chameleons™
Chutzpah....the original manifestation of what happens when self- constraint is forgotten.
Classic converso maneuver 😊
Exactly
The dual meaning of "not counting" could well be a way to pre-emptively defend against a future 'reckoning'.
Hypothetically speaking, if you inject a phrase like "they/we don't count" in to the collective imagination, it's not hard to see how that may result in some people passed over and avoiding the worst of what can be doled out during times of strife and/or collapse.
every single time.
They are playing everybody against each other to prevent effective opposition to them.
Get any DVD out your collection, skip to the end credits and read the names of the writers, technical staff etc..... and tell my J's are under represented
Their entire suggested premise is ethically absurd:
_"Hey! You over there! You should feel bad and guilty about whatever advance you are able to obtain for yourself and for those most like you. Advance for you is inherently unethical."_
_"Me on the other hand. I should embrace whatever advance I can get for myself and for those most like me. Because I am good, and you are bad (because you are not me). Furthermore, you should be happy for my advance because it proves that I am good and that my advance is ethical. If not, it further demonstrates that you are bad"._
No wonder they are always smirking.
This is how everyone thinks, get over it. Nobody wants to compete anymore and weak and greedy people like the ones you described have always existed. There are those who look for advancement in any area while at the same time not necessarily wanting to stop the advancement of others. I WANT people to be on my level. Maybe then, I would have some competition. I’ve only met one person like that in my life.
Was Rapaport giving his best Mayer Amschel Rothschild impersonation there? Pretty convincing, I must say.
Theres a very subtle way for it to make sense in some messed up way: "I never felt white growing up because im jewish" is him knowing hes jewish, acting jewish and associating with that.
but then he tries to intelectualize his success with "i was only successful because others viewed me as white heterosexual"
Its a wheasly but that is the ironman statement id say
You and Keith should put animosity aside. Both of you have done a lot for the right when it comes to a rebirth. The fact you are noticing says all.
Stephen Fry has "suddenly" found his Jewish identity to.
Maybe it’s hereditary
The small hats have a predisposition toward psychopathy. Psychopathy is almost entirely heritable. That’s what we all actually notice.
"They call our sons their own, when all their dirty wars commence..."
All seems old hat to me, containers gonna contain.
Gradually I began to hate them.
He got paid to be around Courtney Cox and Helen Baxendale. That is all I know of him.
Thanks AA for giving me a chuckle! It's amazing the way these people think.
its not a contradiction AA because no one told you life was going to be this way.
Your job's a joke, you're broke, your love life's DOA
It's like he's always stuck in second gear?
😆 I’m not a sitcom watcher and at first I was appalled that some would attack AA in that fashion.
"I'll be there for your" is the TV?
Female detected
They can’t keep their story straight for more than five minutes. So tiresome.
AA, please do a deep dive on the history of p_d0 tunnels, particularly perhaps of the J-wsh making. Thanks.
Wouldn't that be too spicy for YT?
Not a surprise, to be a leftist is to live in a state of contradiction, and often celebrate it.
Thats why their mental instability is through the roof
@@jasonchambers4495some are more contradictory than others
Rapaport a stereotypical tunneller…
Edifying stuff AA. Thanks.
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do." Emerson
"It's high status to reflexively deceive."
Is it just me or does Baddiel look really demonic in that picture?
Wow, I thought he was Italian!
Itaaaalians... Are not...
😂
I thought you were going to try and avoid this topic AA 😂
Rappaport is the absolute worst.
Not the absolute worst. We don’t know the names of the absolute worst. That’s their strategy.
Remember when he got hit by the snowball.
No one seems to remember that michael rappaport made his name by playing Irish American gangsters. Cultural appropriation.
See my comment further up with regard to David Bad Eels take on cultural appropriation.
Is this another case of low-IQ and high-IQ strategies being used simultaneously and each contradicting the other? Same as during lockdown.
Simple, Schwimmer's shape shifted between 2020 and 2022. Also You don't need to be told Howard Jacobson if you ever see him.
This comments section might remember this. In an introduction to one James Lindsay's books he made it explicit that the purpose of the book was defend a form liberalism, inclusion, the protection of women and minorities. Does anyone recall what book that was? I remember seeing a picture or video of someone showing it.
There is an interpretation which is consistent.
Feeling white is internal, whereas the “privilege” one receives for being a white male is dependent on how others perceive you.
Why he never felt white isn’t evident in the title of the article (maybe the article makes it clear). But he could have never felt white for internal reasons (like not going to church) and not because of how others perceived him.
Maybe it's to do with not being or feeling, fully European, a civilisation built upon Christianity following the fall of the Roman Empire. People are more than just a skin colour.
And also absolute bonkers.
Being white is a mindset. A mindset that centers around honor, truth, and responsibility. I know a lot of whites who run away from those things and therefore are more like semites. I used to view them as liberals but now I don’t see much difference between being a liberal and a Semite. 🤠
That feeling is more likely to caused by having a strong group identity in the first place, rather than not being able to get along with the wider society. It's framed the wrong way around. Is hwhyt society less accepting of others, than David's group is to integration?
Michael rappaport is the gift that keeps on giving lol
One might even call this kind of thing schizophrenic... Oh wait a minute
What was David Schwimmer doing in the tunnels?
He's David Digger now
😂
Tunnel jokes - the dirt keeps coming
As AA is a corbyn voting communist now, when do we think he'll go woke and tell us "as a Welsh Iranian I never felt whyte'?
I give it 6 months...
Wait till I get Ash Sarkar to the cafe
He's not white 🇮🇱
The article states that 50% of the main characters in Friends are Jewish. Obviously two are Ross and Monica, but who's the other one supposed to be? Rachel? Chandler?
Rachel Greene
Eastern Europeans - Germans, Russians and Poles, mostly - have had their reputations as a people smeared tangentially when their uninvited visitors took their names but kept behaving like THEM.
To understand it, think about all the killers in the states with Anglo names - like Jabari Smith and Demarcus Pope - arrested with their pants sagging.
They aim to obliterate your associations even to the sanctity of your name.
Or like “Rachel Green(e).”
@@ManawatuFlyFishing Oh right, I never realised that.
Yeah, Rachel is a JAP whom they never "named" as such. All three EPs are tribespeople.
@@NotQuiteFirst in the flashback episodes she has a big nose too...
If I was Jewish I would do everything in my power to stop Michael Rapaport from speaking.
the effort to persuade the right on this issue is only effective on boomers and boomer tier gen Xers
That's when the coercion comes in. Jobs, bank accts etc.
“PIVOT”.
Shapeshifters gonna shapeshift…
Semitic Semantics
Offtopic but the latest Insomnia Stream was a banger
Tunnels?
wouldnt a leftist make the argument that schwimmer may not feel white but he did pass as white. hence the privilege?
The _Painter of Osterreich_ was right about these ghouls. It's right out there for everyone to see.
0:18 "I'm very aware of my privilege as a heterosexual white male.
*Checks wikipedia early life*
Everytime
I'm a man without conviction?
I'm a man who doesn't know
How to sell a contradiction?
You come and go, you come and go
Karma, karma, karma, karma, karma chameleon
You come and go, you come and go
💛
Kermit and Miss Piggy
Its a exellent armor
It's all relative when it suits their interests.
Living with contradictions is the rule, not the exception. As much as we would like that to be the other way around.
The agility of their tongues …
These serpents haven’t changed at all since Christ exposed the Sinagogue of Satan.
Wasn't he also, you know?
@@offshoretomorrow3346 Yes, obviously. The absurdity of Christians critiquing the culture they worship as the inspired Word of God.
7:32 I've been saying this for several years; after successfully ignoring politics for most of my life (even after moving to Los Angeles), Orange Man happened & it took about 3 seconds to see this duplicitous pattern emerging across social media. I didn't exactly need help from the dissident right to conclude that the biggest threat to Western Jewry (especially in the US) was the Radical Left and their unrelenting desire to deconstruct systems of power. Given the scope of the system being discussed, I'd be hiding too. lmao
AA being Iranian may have similar bipolarity?
Not at all.
Welsh?
It’s not a genetic thing. They weaponize trauma against each other. Hollywood movies about the Holocaust is one of the many ways this is achieved.
Friends was just a slightly de-Koshered and younger version of Seinfeld.
I can relate though - never felt "white" growing up as a Finn. Always is something others say. Hmm...
so tiresome. couldnt somebody just make them go away?
They are whatever is expedient in the moment.
2 - they can be reconciled, in that in spite of him knowing he’s white, he doesn’t feel it. Yet, it seems implausible for the same person to hold both of these positions. Which is your actual point (I think).
We can pretty easily harmonize these two statements.
He said he understood his privilege now, he never said anything about understanding privilege in his childhood. On the other hand, the quoye you gave about him not feeling white was an explicit reference to childhood. So, if we wish, we could say that he didn't feel white as a kid, but later learned of his privilege.
Of course, I don't believe this for a moment.
I believe that the way we think of ourselves happens in terms of narrative. We tell ourselves a story about who we are. And i think that, while these two quotes could be reconciled in a single narrative, i believe they actually speak to two different narratives he told about himself at two different times
One correction ...it's pronounced po pourri.
Or popery - is that anti-Catholic?
😂
When asked for a comment from the BBC on his election night, Joe Biden said "I'm Irish." Nobody accuses him of dual loyalty.