Did Snapdragon X Elite Just DESTROY Intel's x86 Chips?
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 06. 2024
- What's the best way to compare Intel's X86 vs Qualcomm's new Snapdragon X Elite ARM chip? Yes, change nothing the CHIP itself! Surface Laptop 6 with Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 165H vs Surface Laptop 7 with X Elite!
THIS is the Surface Laptop YOU Should Buy ➡ geni.us/LtjLsad
Vivobook S 15 with X Elite 78 SKU ➡ geni.us/9hFgu4Y
Surface Laptop 7 with X Elite 80 SKU ➡ geni.us/LtjLsad
Samsung Book4 Edge with X Elite 84 SKU ➡ geni.us/55LmUGu
Timestamps ⬇️
X Elite vs Intel Meteor Lake in the SAME Laptop - 00:00
SSD Speed Compared - 1:43
Geekbench 6 CPU Test - 2:19
Geekbench 6 Vulkan GPU Test - 3:00
Speedometer 3.0 Web Browsing - 3:27
Figma Web Design Compared - 4:03
Cinebench 2024 & Thermals Tested - 5:03
3DMark Steel Nomad Light - 8:15
Blender 4.1 BMW Test - 8:56
Lightroom Photo Editing - 9:42
Battery Test Results - 11:34
DaVinci Resolve Video Editing - 12:58
Does X Elite REALLY Kill Intel's x86? - 14:42
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Shop on Amazon ➡ geni.us/wB2mWqd
Shop on B&H ➡ bhpho.to/2kfoI34
Shop on Adorama ➡ bit.ly/2R7qezq
10% off unlimited yearly music licensing on Soundstripe (what I use for all my videos) use coupon code "Max" here: soundstripe.grsm.io/e/6lv
If you enjoy our content please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $2 a month helps us make more and better content for you!
/ maxyuryev
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
PRIVACY POLICY and FULL DISCLOSURE:
°Max Tech is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com
°Max Tech is a participant in the B&H Photo Video affiliate program that provides an advertising commission if you purchase through our links.
°If you purchase something from our affiliate links will get a small commission with no extra cost to you. This makes it possible for us to make more videos. Thank you!
°We DO NOT collect, store, use, or share any data about you.
~-~~-~~~-~~-~ - Věda a technologie
Vivobook S 15 with X Elite 78 SKU ➡ geni.us/9hFgu4Y
Surface Laptop 7 with X Elite 80 SKU ➡ geni.us/LtjLsad
Samsung Book4 Edge with X Elite 84 SKU ➡ geni.us/55LmUGu
e
love your content
@MaxTechOfficial When testing Lightroom, please connect laptops to 4K monitors and see if sliders in development mode are not lagging. Development mode is sensitive to resolution and for many people fluent developent mode will be more important than exporting speed.
Very nice to see a review of Windows computers, I hope to see many more test reviews of Windows computers, thank you
*CPU Performance of XElite :* 🗿
*GPU performance of XElite :* 🤡
Neural Performance of X Elite:
xd
explain pls ... can't get the emoji joke 😕
@@mr.spokesman5849The first emoji is a stone statue of a strong and masculine man. It represents excellent results. The clown represents laughable results.
@@thegorn thx Gorn!
If Qualcomm can sort out their GPU performance then they'll really compete with Intel and Apple.
I'll wait for the second gen of x-elite. A GPU better than a 1060 in a laptop will be awesome. Hope Samsung book 360 uses the second gen x elite
They will in the next gen, Currently they are using 2x powerful version of 8gen2 gpu which is weak by pc standards
Rumors are that x elite 2 will use more powerful version of 8gen4 gpu , which can have upto 2x performance of m3 gpu (8gen4 gpu is rumored to be on par with m3 gpu)
Currently 8gen3 gpu is more powerful than m1.
@@Silent.killer_007 I'll definitely buy the second gen. X86 for laptops for me its dead
@@gabrielangel1996 i won't say x86 is dead yet, lunar lake is extremely promising in efficiency. They are targeting 15-20w of tdp and gpu will surpass m4💀
And for x elite gen2, it will have the most powerful cpu in windows without a doubt because they will also use ARM V9 SME instructions which apple m4 is using, which can boost its single core performance close to 4000 points in geekbench 6.
And x elite 2 "may be" announced in october of this year along with 8gen4 (8gen4 is confirmed in october) because they announced x elite with 8gen3 in previous year
@@Silent.killer_007 8gen3 gpu is more powerful than the M1 wow impressive the M1 is 4 years old with the M4 M4 Pro M4 Max and M4 ultra coming anytime soon
Intel one consumes more power when sleeping than the X Elite watching CZcams.
Who buys a $1,300 laptop to watch youtube videos. You might as well get a $200 chromebook that consumes even less power. The real battery drain happens when doing heavy tasks, and x86 chips are simply more performant, taking less time, therefore draining less battery life.
@@sophieedel6324 Valid, but you missed some common sense. People can do both, watch YT vids or do intensive tasks on their laptop. It's not an either or situation
@@sophieedel6324 "x86 chips are simply more performant, taking less time, therefore draining less battery life" That's an insane statement to make.
@@DS-Pakaemonx86 are more performant than ARM chips, due to the extended x86 instruction sets. There is nothing "insane" about it. If one has to do a heavy workload, x86 will finish that task sooner, and end up using up less battery life than ARM. If you only watch videos or browse the web, yes I'm sure ARM is more battery efficient, and RISC-V is more battery efficient still. But I would hope a $1,300 laptop is not being bought just to browse the web and watch youtube videos, a $200 chromebook can do that too.
@@sophieedel6324 Doesn't change the fact X Elite consumes a lot less than Intel when sleeping & streaming. Also unlike you, I don't assume how people actually use their laptops. Secondly, $200 chromebooks have shitty TN panel 760p, non-existent contrast screens and loads videos very slowly. You act like one would get a similar experience using that and a $1300 with 2.5k MiniLED high contrast screens.
I am impressed with X Elite, not by its performance or battery life, but price. $500 USD cheaper than Intel. I hope that $1,000 barrier will be broken soon.
Maybe with the surface go?
Or as mentioned in yesterday's video; The Macbook Air M1 for $699. After 4 years it still competes well, and with a much lower price.
The unit is optimize for 4 years straight @@RA-nm9xu
@@RA-nm9xu again it's macOS
50 to 60 percent software aren't available for mac
@@aibi5532as an IT consultant most people buying a laptop at that price point wont be running into thid issue.
Me waiting for a 75Wh battery on the Snapdragon X Plus for ultimate battery life.
99wh , vapor chamber cooling , with 16 inch oled will get great
@@frankwong9486vapour chamber for such low TDP are u kidding
@@rajbhararyan4746 100w isn't that low , lower temp = more room for boost clock before hitting thermal limit/ fan need to rev up
There are different kind of VC +
/VC+ fin stack for different TDP value
You can found VC on smartphone, on laptop like Samsung ultra book / dell XPS and it been proved have better cooling capacity than regular heat pipe+fin stack cooling
So, why not ?
@@frankwong9486G16 2024 need this chips.
It has full capability to run snapdragon x elite 84 at full 80 watt.
It's battery with core ultra is 12 hours , it will be more higher.
The chip does support discrete gpu that will fix the weak integrated gpu.
Acer does that with an IPS display
Even in the unlikely scenario that ARM will take over the x86 market, Intel has future proofed itself by building fabs that will feature the new ASML High NA-EUV lithography machines. They won't have an issue building other companies ARM chips because that's a software instruction set, not a hardware issue.
Sooooo Intelvjust needs to learn to compete in a market that it doesn't dominate and maintain tye position through bullying and illegal practices, but being efficient and innovating.
They're doomed. Oh well, what's on Netflix? 🤣
The more of these tests I see of x86 CISC versus ARM RISC I'm beginning to think Intel basically set computing back 2 decades by killing all of the competition with marketing and market manipulation. Had ARM or PPC or some other RISC based chip been able to compete with x86 through the 90s and 00s at the same level of developer integration as x86 the computing world would look vastly different than it does today!
Agreed. I remember being in high school / early college and hearing how risc could never handle the complex workloads of cisc
Guess what - its NOT that ARM on Windows will suceed this time because it is technically better but because it is CHEAPER. Of course the alternatives in the 90s were better ( like a MIPS based SGI O2 which had a crossbar ... ) - but those we niche computers with a price tag.
This is the end of the 5% yearly improvements made by Intel to justify buying a new machine. I don't know if they will recover.
A little oversimplified don't you think? ARM was used in the 1st gen iPhone from what..2007? So that is 17 years where you had a computer in your pocket. Apple had a three year transition to ARM that pissed a lot of people off because they disabled 32 bit, but Apple makes it's money from phones rather that computers for the most part so they could absorb the hit to the pocket. The only other company I can think of that could absorb that financial hit for the transition is Samsung. MS played with ARM but gave it up until Apple hit the market. You are thinking fun shit on your PC and they are thinking market share. The only reason Apple ran with it was because they had no gamer market to lose. They were all about professionals. Even now the graphics performance on the X Elite is 1/2 of the iMacs, so what do they gain today?
You are in a bubble, sorry. If NASA was at peak, absolutely the ARM chip would have developed further because every bit of power is life in space but here on earth we have power sockets.
just wait for inter lunar lake w'll be very good at battery
The heat and fan noise from the Intel chips is the main problem for all my customers. None of them need massive CPU power, just enough to run Office programs. As soon as Lenovo, Acer, Dell etc start releasing more reasonably priced ARM laptops, all my customers will shift to ARM based laptops. I hope for Intel they have a business plan for surviving without the pc marked.
Snapdragon X Elite 🔋🔋🔋💪
Should mention X Elite battery is smaller compared to the one in Intel
OMG - a Snapdragon Surface GO will run circles around their old Intel based predecessors... . Hope we get that fantastic new BT keyboard too...
That's a machine I'm *eagerly* looking forward to!
Not sure how much demand there will be for a $400 keyboard for the Surface Go. (The version for the Surface Pro is $450, but a smaller one for the Surface Go will probably cost a bit less.) Even if that price includes the pen.
eager to see comparison when Luna Lake launch and against the Zen 5 mobile from AMD as well.
amd will launch their arm chips in 2025 and it will DESTROY snapdragon!!!
@@talison461except for efficiency tho
@@talison461Yeah the Xelite
By then we'll have Xelite Gen 2 or something lmaoo
@@talison461 if you want gpu performance might as well goes for nvidia because they gonna release windows on arm next year as well.
I'm especially curious about that comparison too.. I think Zen 5 will be the superior choice overall.
I don’t think the Elite will compete with Lunar Lake. As it looks right now, this could compete and surpass this in efficiency (crazy to say this about Intel). Especially in GPU performance Lunar Lake will stomp this…
The Surface 7 CPU is actually 3.4ghz, not 4.0. It can do a temporary boost to 4.0ghz, but it normally runs at 3.4ghz.
All x86 cpu's have adaptive boost as well, and market them as such. Apples to apples
Yes and the boost clocks are also more so for single-threaded applications. Not for multi-threaded compute-heavy tasks like benchmarks, video encoding, CPU rendering or physics simulation
The surface is still not capable of everything that is done on a real computer.
@@harryniedecken5321 You mean the Surface with the ARM processor.
@@harryniedecken5321 You mean the Surface with the ARM CPU, not the Intel version. Come on now brotha!
0:29 - woah, MTL platform with 5TB SSD for only 400USD more? Jackpot.
This is what the discussion should have always been about. What good are those powerful intel and amd laptoos if they fall apart when you unplug them? Laptops are supposed to be portable and mobile.
This is the only comparison that matters… the Mac vs windows comparisons are the most pointless reviews. Most people have an operating system they prefer and aren’t going to switch. Me being windows myself with having a history with Mac and never going back, I don’t care how “close” the performance is against Mac… I care how much quicker it is than the previous generation of itself.
While ARM is cool, it still needs some time for all the apps to work on it. I am more interested in the next generation since that is probably when we won’t have see a problem with apps because of the x86 architecture.
Windows RT came out October 2012. How much time does windows need to optimize Windows off ARM?
@@angusmatheson9997it's not windows, its the developer and Qualcomm drivers. Even on emulation x-elite is winning.
Same here, I'll wait for x-elite 2. Probably a better GPU and CPU and software integration.
@@angusmatheson9997yup, windows is fine, emulation is fine. It’s in dev’s hands now
@@gabrielangel1996 it’s all thanks to Apple they hired engineers from Intel and Google and developed the M1 chips that did release in 2020 Qualcomm was blown away and had no competing product those engineers from Intel and Google who worked for Apple did leave Apple and started there own chip company Nuvia to develop and make sever chips Qualcomm acquired Nuvia and that’s how they made the X-Elite without Apple there would be no X-Elite we would still have the SQ3 SQ4 chips
Should be interesting when the Lunar Lake version of these Windows Surfaces and others comes out. I would expect the benchmarks to jump ahead of X Elite. Especially GPU tasks.
It'll be interesting to see. By then, the Snapdragon chipset will be much better optimized and Devs will start taking advantage of that 4tf GPU.
Graphics wise will be better, for sure. But CPU wise i really doubt. Lunar lake has 8 cores with 4 of them being e-cores. And Intel has never been good with power efficient.
@@gabrielangel1996 Remember, these new Intel CPU's will have a completely different architectural design which will be significantly more efficient then the current. Can't wait to see the differences.
@@williamcopeland2617 the same blabla happended with meteor lake. Do you really believe a word intel says about battery life?
yes and a dead battery in 3 hours lol
Max, please, do a video comparison for anti-reflective coating quality between various Mac/windows laptops you have access to. The problem is that glossy screens hardly usable when working with text unless they have proper anti reflective coating. It's especially relevant nowadays, when dark mode supported in most of the apps, and even macOS/Windows support it now. When you use dark mode app with text (source code, web page, article, spreadsheet data) and your screen just cheap glossy, you see a mix of text and reflections, just a mess...
If you are working indoors, you won't have a problem with the Surface Laptop. The Surface Pro 11 screen blows them all out though. Just make sure to buy it with that OLED screen.
It's so funny that when Apple released their XDR Pro display with glossy finish, all Apple fans drooled over the glossy model, but now it's a fight between a Microsoft glossy and an Apple anti-reflective, we're back at glossy being useless.
Don't you guys have any standards?!
@williamcopeland2617 , just making screen brighter isn't really good solution, since too bright screen is uncomfortable for the eyes and not recommended health-wise. Plus it would eat laptop battery faster. Also, OLEDs aren't great for everyone - they have PWM flickering, and some people sensitive to it, even to ~1400hz screen pwm. Some windows glossy laptops do have proper anti reflective coating. But really a few.
Simple. Don't use dark mode. Problem solved. I completely do not understand why people code hours on end with a mirror on their face and use a dark theme and make things even worse.
I have Windows laptop at work with glossy screen without proper anti reflective coating, and reflections are quite noticeable even with light themes. It's still relevant issue.
Whats the performance of the intel version when plugged in? Would it be comparable or better? Just to get the full picture
AMD Strix and Intel Lunar Lake series will probably be more efficient than X Elite while being stronger
Which one would be stronger with excel?
Used not to care about the fan noise but that changed while at University as it was so distracting when my DELL Inspiron laptop which was a 2 in 1 could just randomly decide to fire its jet engines😅. Everyone in the room would look at me. I definitely sold it off a quick as I could 😅 Currently have a Lenovo and that makes less fan noise 🙂 Hope too get a Mac in future.
M1 MacBook Air is like $600 and it’s still solid 👌🏾
The surface 7 has a larger battery (and higher refresh rate, though it's variable don't know if that saved some power in these tasks). You can never compare business laptops to consumer laptops price-wise, because of service/support, most windows laptops cost the same as their qualcom competitors at launch. Interested to see lunar lake/strix comparisons and next gen qualcom chip, since this one was intended to be for servers.
This is the first gen chip, Qualcomm make great GPUs for smartphones (leading GPU In any phone chip). I'm sure we will see significant improvements in terms of GPU performance in upcoming versions.
Thank you VERY much for this, best comparison yet, and actually this is the only in-depth look at the Surface Laptop 6 for Business on the web anywhere yet.
I'll get a Laptop 6 next week, bc the SL7 is unfortunately not sold to business yet - so this was especially helpful for me. Ofc I would have loved to get the 7, now even more than before ...
Not true, you can buy a SL7 for business with 11 Win Pro preinstalled ;).
You read my mind! Thanks! 🙏
wasnt that speedometer test done on micrsoft edge?
Was that Blender 4.3 alpha they have in ARM version on the daily builds page?
This is the exact video I wanted but was too lazy to comment and request
The GPU on the X Elite 84 should compare equally with the Intel. It has 4.6 tflops compared to 3.6 tflops on the surface X Elite. Try with Samsung book edge let's see
also that cinebench score makes no sense what was the average power consumotion and clockspeed of that intel cpu because no wat is that cpu scoring 550 at 50w you can get that score with amd 8840u running at 16w,please check that
50W was the peak, it then ran at 30W and by the end dipped to low 20’s
@@MaxTechOfficial ah that explains it
The elite x just needs qualcomm/windows firmware and software updates and app optimizing to make it a strong competitor to apple. to at least make it good enough. Next gen should be a blast.
It's just matter of time.
Thanks great test!
Please test also amd strix point
Best reviews brotha. Can't wait for lunar lake, hope it is awesome
Can you please add a comparison of WSL2 performance? For example for a larger Node.js project.
After this review I finished my coffee, and got myself a new toy. The keyboard is extraordinary, bit clicky, but this 15 inch screen is good, the battery life so far.... 6% drain. On that note, take a look at the bezels, on the 15" it is really visible. So long for now to Apple, but they will respond in the fall. For now this device cost me 2k including taxes (Canadian), yes I bought the cheapest one and the 1TB drive update is already on its way. Let's see how replaceable it is.
Hope you enjoy!
The x elite really lived up to the hype. Hopefully they sell enough for ARM to become the lead developement platform. Its already good through Prism but would be awesome when everything runs natively on ARM. My samsung galaxy book 4 edge runs apple smooth. I also left it in sleep mode for a few days. Was good to go a second after opening the lid and had only lost a few percent battery. The second gen would benefit from a big graphics upgrade but tbh its not really essential for this type of device as i doubt anyone buys a thin and light to game.
Only thing i'm interested in at this point is overall power efficiency and battery duration. I still have my X1 Carbon 5 generation i got around 2018 with no need to upgrade. As of right now there is a T14s generation 4 AMD and T14s generation 6 Snapdragon i'm interested in but Snapdragon still fairly new and doubtful of Linux support
bro if you want the best performance go to edit battery plan and make the min processing power to 100 plugged in and out and also for the max processing power. this gives you a much bigger porformance boost
I have done this with all of my computers and it has made them faster
This is true, I do the opposite (set to 95 max) in order to avoid overheating on my 2019 laptop. But let’s be honest it’s such a pain in the ass that we even have to tinker with these settings in the first place.
Love your videos😍😍😍😍😍
Lunar Lake will be more interesting
Why?
I’ve got my doubts about that chip. But it’ll be cool if it can live up to what they’re saying it can do. It’s lacking things like hyper threading though
@@christianr.5868 yeah would be really fun to see x86 being able to compete :) Hyperthreading uses more power and since they’re going all in with power efficiency I guess and they’re still getting a good amount of IPC improvement. Let’s hope intel keeps their word and we’ll get amazing chips to compete as that always the best for us ;)
@@lesleyhaan116 much more designed like apples m chips and how the processor is built. Have a look at some demos where a 4k 60fps video only uses 2/3 Watts on Lunar Lake and about 20/25 on Meteor Lake
@@lorenzocorsomusic1308 i think that's for encoding if im not wrong, gaming performance is still really impressive(leaks suggest that Xe2 gets the same performance as Strix 880M while using HALF the power)
Microsoft overpriced their laptops and for some reason, laptops manufacturers always include around 45 WH battery capacity on x86 laptops. I’m not sure why, but with competition ramping up, it looks like this is bound to change. Thanks for pointing out the build quality on the Intel laptop vs snapdragon, it kinda proved what I was thinking. Looking forward to AMD AI and Intels Lunar Lake CPU’s. It’s about time they looking more into mobility and providing that all day battery life that MacBook offers.
I think Microsoft actually has the most reasonably priced base model laptop for snapdragon CPUs
@@NissocoMCthat’s because it works in their favor to push Qualcomm exclusivity deal with ARM processors.
@@nick-dogg no its literally leaked in the dell slides that x elite is nearly 100$ cheaper than intel meteor lake 7 processors
@@riceflakes498 look up the deal Microsoft made with Qualcomm back in 2016, rumors are it’s set to expire at the end of the year. This is why you only have Qualcomm releasing ARM processors for Windows’s
can you also please make tests of Surface Pro? looking for replacement for my SP6 and thinking of the new one
One weakness of all Windows on Arm systems: device drivers. If you depend on some unusual peripheral, the odds are it won't work. Drivers MUST be native; emulation isn't supported. That's going to kill the prospects for Arm in a lot of vertical markets.
The specs comparison at 0:27 says the Intel has 5126 GB SSD? That's either mistyped or I'm in need of an eye doctor lol.😂
When can we expect copilot + pc on desktop
How you instal lightroom classic? I have surface pro with snapdragon x elite and i dont see in adobe Creative cloud?
Are those GPU benchmarks ARM versions already?
x86 just needs to be more optimized, ARM catches up BECAUSE the manufacturer put REAL effort to make it fast and competitive with data from millions of devices inside smartphones.
x86 gets too comfortable with their dominance without real breakthrough. just as we ever see x86 powered smartphones.
The competitor will be Lunar Lake. That should level out the X Elite advantage.
Naaah
I think it's AMD Strix point/Strix Halo
microsoft needs to stop playing with stupid designs like the surface duo and do a proper good android phone with full compatibility with windows machines, they would create the perfect ecosystem to compete with apple
No because Windows is trash
X Elite is great at beating last years laptops...
In 2 months it's gonna be faced with AMD Strix and Intel Lunarlake. Both will be superior.
this is why competition is good. no body wants to be defeated, said michael jackson..
Normal people shouldn't expect X Elite to immediately wipe the floor. Like Intel ARC, the first generation might be rough. But consequent generations will be a lot better. The only problem I have is that unlike Intel ARC, Qualcomm was hyping it up to be an M3 Pro destroyer, even though it was more like an Intel/AMD competitor.
Great video! Just I find Speedometer quite inconsistent. I got 25 points on my work laptop with i7-1365u in incognito mode. And this is older generation than Intel machine in this test with only 20 points.
Nice job 👍 👍
windows hibernates at 2% because thats set as the default critical battery percentage. it does this to go to hibernation before the power gets too low so that an unexpected shutdown doesnt happen and your work doesnt get lost
I feel we might be overzealous about the snapdragon chip since the competitive chips from AMD and Intel will be launched soon. However the performance difference is quite amazing.
DaVinci Resolve ARM is still in beta, but it's gonna get a lot better. So this is really impressive.
The Intel chip was developed in conjunction with George Foreman Grills
Adding percents is hard. You should have paid attention in mid school. When you have 39% battery left that means, that you used 61%, which is your base. In fact the snapdragon laptop result was (39/61)*100 = 64% better, because it would be able to run for 64% longer(than the Intel one) under the same load.
@3:42 says Chrome but the tests were run in edge seconds after
Thanks so much for this comparison! I’m a Win user and it looks like X Elite is a no brainer for an education user with a return policy in case I can’t get a critical app working.
0:31 it should be 512 GB for the intel model, not 5216.
Would be interesting to see Qualcomm workout a partnership with AMD for integrated graphics.
Qualcomm, like Apple, needs to be the backend for Intel, AMD, Nvidia and all other AI models.
And a vice-versa must happen, too. Sony needs to work with Apple and Qualcomm to get their AI backend so they can make theirs connect to their own products and Google.
The sooner people do that, the sooner the world can get the bigger picture and start doing right for our environments all across the globe.
This is what I wanted to know too!
Your graph and audio don't match the SSD benchmark that is shown on the screen. On the screen it says that the Intel SSD was clearly faster than the ARM one.
Meteor lake doesn't matter much anymore. Lunar lake is coming. And amd strix point is launching next month. X elite losing to competition within a couple months of launching will not be a good look.
Intel Ultra Core 9 AI Chipset Vs Snapdragon X Elite 84 AI Chipset Vs AMD Ryzzen AI 9 Chipset comparison with 16 inch 16GB/32 GB RAM Laptop would be fair and best which is needed.?
You need to compare them with the SAME POWER LIMIT for the whole laptops (ideally checked with multimeter)
ultra 9, 185H vs snapdragon elite, which one more fast ?
Snapdragon. But amd beats them both
Comparison is not fair since meteor lake is old; do this comparison again when lunar lake comes out
There is quite a lot of things discusses in this video that are unfair or misunderstood.
You should not compare the temperature of the CPU cores under load. different CPUs are designed to operate at different temperatures before they throttle. Snapdragon running at 96c instead of 102 does not mean that the CPU is more efficient.
The fan noise also does not have to do with the CPU. If the fan noise sounds different on the intel system its not caused by the CPU.
The 5Ghz advertised by Intel is boost clocks. it means that they will run at that speed for short bursts to speed up tasks that are CPU intensive but for a limited duration, like starting an application or rendering a web page in your browser.
When under sustained load, especially on all cores, the CPU is not supposed to run at high clock rates. That is normal.
You also cannot compare clock speed directly as IPC is generally more important than clock speed.
12:01 It's actually 66% better battery
why use google chrome for testing not Microsoft edge?
I’d love to see a comparison between the SL7 snapdragon X elite vs SL7 snapdragon X plus for general snappiness and battery life
I've got a Dell XPS15, 2023. I get, wait for it,.. 4 hours battery for normal office usage.
Very very good Video!!!
Gotta think like the regular user. Finally they can get a windows PC without the bullshit that intel have been throwing them.
Intel played dirty. Didnt capitalise. Now ARM catches up and delivers.
Talk ahout GPU all you want. Most of the people I know arent gaming, rendering in blender or anything like that.
x86 still has the entire software backlog ARM simply doesn't have. People won't care about the CPU they're using UNTIL half their apps outright don't work or run like garbage because they require emulation.
The Snapdragon x elite windows laptop I have (the 64GB RAM version of Surface Laptop) is very good.
But I'm debating if I should return it, for a laptop with a dedicated GPU (rtx 4070) and i9 Intel processor with 32 GB RAM now, for video editing on the side. It's also about the same price as the surface laptop I got, too.
I feel like Resolve on ARM isn't really that optimized now (in Resolve 19, Beta 4), and if it will be, I just tested magic mask on a :10 second clip, and my desktop computer with a Ryzen 9 and an RTX 3080 blew my surface laptop out of the water. My surface laptop feels very slow by comparison (took a few minutes to render out the magic mask on its end).
I was kind of expecting close to Mac M3 performance for Resolve, but I'm a bit disappointed.
Though, I also don't know the real benefits of the Snapdragon chips, aside from great CPU performance and battery life... For editing, I don't know if there's much there for Resolve, but if Blackmagic is still optimizing for the chip, should I just wait?
(I think I got 60-day return policy, so I may at least wait 40 days...)
The CPU is noticeably better than with the new Snapdragon X Elite. However, the GPU and app compatibility (including old printers) are far better with the Surface Laptop 6. The app compatibilities can change in the Snapdragon Elite's favor in a few months. The GPU cannot change.
If you don't need the GPU for your daily workflow or hobbies, the Surface Laptop 7 is the clearly better choice long-term. If you need some GPU power for your workflow or hobbies and you cannot wait for app compatibilities now, go with the Surface Laptop 6.
Ohh man, I remember the 2010, when Intel did nothing but kept charging us a fortune for each paper based generation bump. Now their karma is coming after them and biting their arses.
Damn, Intel's been sitting on their asses all this time, and I hope they get served a big dose of humble pie . BTW, those temperatures were pretty much equal, but I see that the Snapdragon CPU is able to sustain higher frequencies even at those temperatures
Meteor lake was a good processor but just too expensive, it's so dumb that ultra 7 laptops cost 1.5x of some 4060 laptop with 12th gen Intel in my country
Thanks you we proud of you all 😻👅
next up - do snapdragon x elite laptop vs fully maxed out macbook pro 16 inch with m3 max
More competition is always a good thing. However, not everything is better with X-Elite and MS Windows...
Gotta love what competition does, better products for us.
I was waiting this comparison. But Qualcomm needs to improve a lot GPU performance in the next generation to bit Intel and Macs.
Can you do a test with Ultra 9?
Wow, once Qualcomm updates the GFX, there will very little reason to buy an x86 CPU for laptops in the future.
After the Intel ran out of battery the charging should have been completed before the tests were restarted.
96° Celsius is fairly cool?
96°C is close to the max package temp of 100°C. converted to F 96°C is 204.8°F and 100°C is 212°F
any laptop with i7 14th gwn rtx 4070 vs x elite plz
x elite dont have dedicated graph ?
@@adityadevelopment3435 so it will be 14th Gen vs x elite
The problem is that Intel iGPU is the slowest GPU in the market and Adreno is slower than that. AMDs Ryzen AI 370 iGPU will be roughly 2x faster than Adreno (launch June 28th = 1 month). And Nvidia will of course be much faster, but not great on battery.
I think Qualcomm made a mistake putting a phone-grade GPU in the chip. Galaxy S24 has practically identical GPU. This one is just clocked higher. Apple on the other hand puts much wider GPU models in their laptop SoCs.
Also Adreno GPU architecture needs HW optimizations to be good enough for modern gaming workloads. And they need work with DX12 drivers too.
CPU is great, but GPU needs work. Waiting for next gen Snapdragon.
Yeah the Macbook pro's have a better and more power hungry GPU in them. This laptop is to compete with the Macbook air. Its a ultrabook.
browserbench on my 3yrs old macbook pro m1, is faster than these brandnew laptops. And yes, 8GB RAM
Comparing laptop design(touchpad, screen, etc...) has nothing to do with the processor. It is just the next generation laptop -> next intel laptop will have the same. Also, those synthetic tests are kinda skewed, try playing in an app like Adobe PS or Webstorm(real world use-case) and you'll see how the snapdragon struggles, app freezes, crashes etc
On every test he made with Lightroom on X Elite, selecting subject and background took seconds x Mac. Why now it is almost instantenous?
Machine Learning. Do that edit once or twice on the previous test(s), it should learn that is what he wants to do next time, so it will do it instantly. AI stuff like this is where time will be saved as if you have a hundred photos you want to alter the same way (sky and balloon), which should mean that ML will only need one or two examples before it can learn and change them faster.
@@ahaimes6320 if that is true the test is stupid.
@@AndreLuizSilva yes, he should change what he does every test so that it has to learn another edit.