Cleaning Worst Carpet Oil Stain - No Water Required - Using Dyson Zorb
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 05. 2020
- Cleaning and removing a horrific greasy oil stain from a plush carpet. No water, no residue, fast drying, and perfect results, all thanks to Dyson Dysolv and Dyson Zorb.
Zorb playlist - • Zorb Microsponge Dry C...
Links:
1. Best way to clean your carpets - • Different Methods of C...
2. Dyson Zorb vs a filthy carpet - • Best Way to Clean Your...
3. Using Zorb to restore a filthy commercial entrance mat - • Cleaning Dirtiest Carp...
I love using this type of carpet cleaning - dry powder method. It’s surprising how easy it is to use with great results too! Plus no long periods of waiting for carpets to dry or rooms out of use! Still not widely known by home owners as a method to clean carpets! It’s a great way to maintain carpets too and conditions them. Great to see the powder remove the oil stain!
The only thing I’ve find using the dry powder method is with pet messes one application isn’t enough but maybe I need to apply more than one application of the powder which should work! I usually result to the wet cleaning method for this type of mess/stain!
This video demonstrates and explains how to optimally clean water-heavy messes, like pet mess. czcams.com/video/4blouXqBDrE/video.html
Thank you will remember that for future reference.
Nice to see a video from you again.
New subscriber!! Great channel! 👍🥰
Why isn't this mainstreamed?
Hey. I've asked that question myself. It's clearly superior in every way to water based cleaning-from results to drying time...except for one. Water based cleaning is a single process/application, where as zorb is at least 2 (application then removal after drying), possibly 3 when you pre-clean when doing general carpet cleaning. So I think its failure to take off mainstream reflects the laziness of people and their psychological perception of having to do 'more work'. They don't want to have to do THREE simple things when they can just do one thing and put up with the consequences, passively. But, as with everything, you get out what you put in, so at least the option is there for people who care enough. In this video, I showed how much better it was than water-cleaning, and if you rent a counter-rotating brush machine (fairly cheap), you can do large areas of carpet much easier. czcams.com/video/JrRy6Evg31g/video.html
I think another reason is the lack of affordable mainstream counter-rotating brush (CRB) machines. Brushing by hand is hard work, and heaven forbid if people have to do hard work. Water-based cleaners are plentiful on the market. But there are vitually no CRBs. Sebo does a shit one for like £300, but a decent one costs like £800, which is crazy. Thankfully you can rent them cheaply, but people would prefer to buy, I'm sure. No manufacturer, say like Dyson, has ever really developed a machine for a mass audience. Given there are practical benefits, that does suggest there's no market. It would take a big company like Dyson, I think, to 'create' a market with their promotional might, but they haven't done that so far. Pity-especially as they provide Zorb and Dysolv, and they're half way there already. I should probably write to them and ask one of these days. If you don't ask, you don't get.
Cool a new Video from you Thanks! Seems to work pretty well! :-)
Hey I loved the video. The fact that a powder got out oil shows how Dyson has superior cleaning tech. Do you thing Dysolv and Dysorb would get out cat vomit from carpet and sofas. Would it get out smells to. I Hate to use wet cleaning. Wet is fine for time, but constantly wet cleaning is bad for carpet. But my cats vomit constantly. Plus I just spent $2,000 on a new sofa, which can only be dry cleaned and I'm looking for a way to clean it safely encase they puke on it. Thanks.
Liquid spot messes are best cleaned using Dysolv and blotting as demonstrated here czcams.com/video/aKdUZhmBHK4/video.html . No living animal should be vomiting; pet mess problems of that nature are better addressed by a vet than cleaning companies. Liquid messes that penetrate deep into foam padding of furniture should be avoided because it’s very difficult to retrieve without professional dry cleaning. General cleaning of carpets using microsponges is hugely facilitated using a counter-rotating brush machine (expensive but can also be rented) as discussed here czcams.com/video/JrRy6Evg31g/video.html . That video shows how carpet washers spread things like pet mess through the carpet and into the backing making a smelly mess. Zorb blotting and microsponges control liquid content and work very effectively without any drawbacks.
Excellent demonstration. Where do you buy the products?
Any respectable online retailer. I get mine from Amazon.
My opinion on the V11 Outsize is that it's a more "convenient" option for the average consumer, probably because Dyson realized they could. From what I can tell, all the main changes (a bigger bin and dual batteries) are just for convenience and they aren't part of the main line.
Not sure I've seen any evidence a double-battery solution is more "convenient". If anything, it's considerably less convenient because it introduces a relatively large amount of battery management hassle.
@@VacuumFacts Yet, people celebrate it. Don't know why to be honest. I think the convenience comes from the fact that "you can double your battery life!" but it's not quite true. For some vacuums if done correctly it will, but most of the time you don't achieve double battery time and even then it suffers from all the same normal problems. I still believe that this won't bother their main philosophy about vacuums in any way, and that the Outsize is just a more convenient vacuum to get (and maybe to get more money during these uncertain times) while they focus on the V12 and/or future models.
The vacuum's not bad; it's just the double battery solution kludge that's poor and a step backwards. The problem will resolve itself when Dyson start manufacturing solid state batteries and selling them to other companies within the next year or two.
What do you think of the new V11 Outsize and the new swappable batteries?
It's essentially a larger V11; this has advantages and disadvantages, and which wins will depend on your situation and needs. The double-battery solution, however, is not good. The downside of a double-battery is net negative and I think a step-backwards for Dyson. Double batteries will double battery pollution and incur charging and changing hassle, undermining the elegance of a single-battery, zero effort solution. While you get more run time, it has been shown time and again that even large homes can be vacuumed on a single charge. Advocating vacuuming the whole house in one tiring weekly mega-clean chore in this way undermines the elegance of the cordless formfactor, which instilled the concept of bite-sized, manageable, shorter and more regular cleans, weighted to demand. A better solution will always be a single battery solution; future battery technology will solve the need for double-battery kludges as Dyson have done here. The only benefit to hot swappable batteries is for commercial cleaning environments where vacuuming time is substantial, but Dyson don’t cater to this demographic. As such, this kludge is a step backwards that panders to the unthinking who feel bigger runtime numbers and battery counts is automatically a good thing, without looking at the consequences. There is no good argument why that’s the case, here. Boo Dyson! Be smarter and don’t pander to the lowest common denominator for a fast buck! Fortunately, they've only marketed this in the US (I think) and it's not looking like a global release.
@@VacuumFacts I find it a shame Dyson does make or maybe just market to the commercial vacuum market as a lot of their other products are. They even market a commercial hair dryer.
Technically the hair dryer is a home product that can be used by salons etc. Their hand dryers are mainly for commercial environments, though.
@@VacuumFacts There is a professional version, which from what I saw just means it has a longer cord and a discount if you can prove you are a licenced hairstylist. I'm sure they could market the uprights as commercial units.