6 Steps to Expertise in ANYTHING - No Talent Required!
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 05. 2024
- Visit brilliant.org/PythonProgrammer/ to get started for free and you'll get an extra 20% off too 😃
This is a video about Bloom's Taxonomy. Benjamin Bloom was a researcher. He spent most of his life researching how we learn, how we're taught and how we develop expertise. He concluded that experts are made not born.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @gilesmcmullen
🍿 WATCH NEXT:
Want to Read Faster? Watch this - • How to ACTUALLY absorb...
Become a Super Learner using science - • A Science based System...
⌚️Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
00:32 6 Steps to Expertise
00:50 Why Bloom's method is useful
01:15 It's called Bloom's Taxonomy
01:36 How to do it
01:53 Step 1 Remember
02:14 Step 2 Understand
02:43 Step 3 Apply
03:10 Lower Order Thinking
03:31 Step 4 Analyze
04:09 Critical Thinking
05:33 Step 5 Evaluate
06:02 Step 6 Create
06:39 Thank you Brilliant
Learn Data Science (affiliate link)
🎓 Data Quest - bit.ly/3yClqbZ
Learn Python with Giles
🎓 Exploratory Data Analysis with Python and Pandas - bit.ly/2QXMpxJ
🎓 Complete Python Programmer Bootcamp - bit.ly/2OwUA09
📚 My favourite python books for beginners (affiliate links)
📗 Python Crash Course 2nd Edition amzn.to/33tATAE
📘 Automate the Boring Stuff with Python amzn.to/3qM1DFl
📙 Python Basics - A Practical Introduction to Python 3 amzn.to/3fHRMdb
📕 Python Programming An Introduction to Computer Science amzn.to/33VeQCr
📗 Invent Your Own Computer Games with Python amzn.to/3FM3H4b
🆓 Free Python Resource
python-programming.quantecon....
(This is a great introduction to python)
⚙ My Gear
💡 BenQ Screen Bar Desk Light - amzn.to/3tH6ysL
🎧 Sony Noise Cancelling Headphones - amzn.to/3tLl82G
📱 Social Media
/ gilesmcmullen
/ gilesmcmullen
👌 SUBSCRIBE to ME!👌
/ @gilesmcmullen
I used the taxonomy to assess my teaching. If my students can teach another , or pose higher order, imaginative questions, that's learning. I learned when some students are reciting the basic ideas or concepts that's a way for them to integrate into long-term memory. When teachers have students create a different ending for a story or compare two different fairy tales, it's evaluation and create, ascending to HOT. I always wrote things down not realising I was teaching myself, as I do now learning Excel.
The taxonomy is great, but, the learning order has been challenged since. Starting at the bottom (remember) has a steep forgetting curve. Isolated pieces of information tend to get forgotten quickly (they don't necessarily connect with your previous knowledge). So, it's inefficient. Starting with higher levels (apply, analyze) provides you a purpose to start with and it connects better with your pre-existing knowledge. Every time you get blocked, then there's an opportunity to go lower to remember and understand. Without an "apply" or "analyze" there's no problem to solve in the first place. Trying to remember everything first "just in case" is a major pitfall.
In your carbonara example, everyone already knows *why* they are learning it and everyone can also taste other carbonaras to compare. They are not exactly starting with the *remember* level, right? There must be some sort of structure that the bits and pieces of the *remember* stage can connect. Otherwise, it's just a waste (highly inefficient).
interesting! Do you have any tips for readning or maybe other youtube videos on the topic?
@@eriko9011 Justin Sung or Benjamin Keeps, PHD channel...
@@eriko9011 that it is quite scattered in CZcams. A good resource is Justin’s course: iCanStudy. However, that course contains more content than just that. Besides being not free, it is quite necessarily painful to go through.
About CZcams material: unfortunately, most of CZcamsrs do a video as soon as they have superficial material and the topic is actually quite nuanced. My opinion is that you can only learn a few details here and there but there’s no single place with the entire underlying knowledge structure. To be fair, that would be a multi-hour video or a course.
Try the following to see how it goes:
1. Prime your learning motivation by knowing the problem you’re trying to solve. Or, the ways you’ll need to retrieve the new material.
2. Start with pre-existent knowledge and find bridges to the new material. The principle is: more connections -> easier to memorize.
3. Follow a good material resource quickly to find what things connect with your pre-existing knowledge. Focus on that first and postpone learning other unknown stuff to later.
4. Organize your learning in a top-down approach: pick a handful of overarching key ideas first. Details will then have something to hook on (instead of just being suspended and easily forgotten).
5. Simplify the material until it becomes obvious to you.
6. Now, your pre-existing knowledge is bigger. Repeat everything using the material you postponed in step 3.
You can't remember b'cuz you have a high-falutin approach to remembering things. You need a more meaningful way to connect the bits of info.
If I asked you where your bathroom was, or your sofa or what's in your refrigerator..you'd probably be able to recall it with ease simply b'cuz you can visualize your home (a context) and "walk thru" it and use it as a frame of reference to recall _other bits of info_ (like your socks, toothbrush, suitcase, etc).
Kids _remember_ their ABC's b'cuz they *attached* it to the song 'Twinkle Twinkle Little Star'. But if you asked those same kids all the high level questions about language, phonetics and blah blah blah...all you'll get from them are blank stares..but they can _recall_ every letter of the alphabet like a mofo.
And that's what you need to do: Stop taking yourself so seriously. Connect fun/playful associations to whatever it is you're trying to remember. Create a playful & meaningful "house" where you can go to hang those new bits of info - so that when you "walk thru" it, you can find info just as easy as you would your toothbrush or a pair of socks.
The more absurd the context/visualization is, the easier it will be to recall the bits of infos _attached_ to it. Hope this helps.
I can only agree with your statement. I learnt R programming by starting to code from scratch the scripts that I needed for my work. I had no knowledge of R whatsoever, and I just googled the pieces I needed and stitched them together in a trial and error way until I finally got the result I wanted. Only then I started to memorise and understand commands and functions
Bloom's taxonomy truly illuminates the path from novice to expert by emphasizing the critical role of applying and synthesizing knowledge. It's a reminder that true expertise comes from deep engagement and rigorous practice, not just passive learning. 👍
0:50 Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create are the 6 steps to become an expert at anything
The problem is everything in this taxonomy depends on the ability to memorize and that is something that isn't always possible due to illness, brain dysfunction, medication, stress, poor diet, etc. The inability of students to memorize basic facts is one of the main challenges of teaching today. Due to brain fog, from chemo, long COVID, and Parkinson's, I'm happy to remember my name so I feel for the kids who are struggling to memorize all the facts they need to know to progress in Bloom's Taxonomy.
I think it's quite logical. When we try something new and do it many many times, we get better at it, obviously. And, as many have already noted, the main thing is that this learning is systematic and structured. Thank You!
A perfect presentation. Loved the gags and I’ve printed out the list.
A couple of things about the Bloom's Taxonomy. That pyramid is not the taxonomy. It represents the Cognitive Dimension of the entire taxonomy. There are three dimensions (Cognitive, Affective, Psycho-motor). A revised taxonomy in 2001 also added another dimension of Knowledge (Declarative, Procedural, Conceptual, and Meta). Also, Bloom never envisioned it as a the "pyramid", nor Lower oder or Higher order thinking.
Of course the single pyramid can be useful but we also need to know that it is massively misrepresented.
The cooking analogy is really good. If I’m making a new dish, I find a recipe and follow it exactly. I only start to change things once I have made it as per the recipe at least once. Programming is an interesting learning process, as I think you need some overall basics (probably variables, loops, inputs and outputs, lists and strings) before you can start really writing custom code yourself. The problem, for me at least, was the whole memorising things. I found that I needed a mix of reading, retyping (from memory) and then practicing over and over with similar but slightly different problems until I’d got the techniques embedded in my mind.
Love it! Thanks for sharing such positive advice 🙏🏻
This was good, but I don't think you distinguished step 2 and 4 enough. The process you describe for Understanding sounds almost identical with that of Analyzing, that being asking questions about why the constituent parts are there in the first place, why them and not something else, etc.
When do you want to travel to Scotland? Very excellent video I don’t know how to express this, but you peaked my interest in learning more about coding and critical thinking and how to become an expert and what field to become an expert about. This is thought provoking thank you
The first three steps are the reverse of the George Bernard Shaw dictum: Those who can, do" (apply). "Those who can't, teach." (understand) Those who can't teach, research." (remember).
Very nice. I have heard of Bloom's Taxonomy, but didn't really know what it was all about. I'm on this path now and I think this compact way of summarising the journey. PS, Uncommon Sense Teaching is a great book! Picked it up on your recommendation. I think that it's a nice compliment to "Make it Stick". Ok, gotta go build a logistic regression model as part of the "do" phase. ;)
OLS? Uni or multi variate... And why?
@@angeloj.willems4362 logistic so not OLS. Multivariate model to predict probability of having diabetes. Just my own learning. I want to transition to stats/data science and the best way to learn, IMO, is to do projects. Generates a tonne of questions and forces you to hunt for answers/make mistakes and all that good stuff.
Bloom's Taxonomy is mostly useful for educators designing courses. That being said, the video is correct in that an awareness of the different levels of understanding can be very helpful in terms of avoiding pointless busywork when presented with training programs or in terms of pushing a bit more.
2:33 I'm sure you do have friends. But good advice. Explaining yourself to yourself is an excellent thinking tool. thank you.
@jackm2293 very powerfull technique
That's where Writing to Learn can be fairly helpful. Writing isn't just for communication, it can also be used as a way of exploring a topic to see what you know, and the result can then be used later on as a refresher if you've stepped away for a while.
Inspiring...Thank you.
Interesting that everyone in the comments feels they are an expert on this subject. Including me!
The taxonomy is spot on in outlining the steps but of course they were always meant to be quickly progressed through then repeated in an endless spiral as new facts & understanding etc are added.
A nice clear video
00:02 Six steps to expertise - no talent required
01:03 Bloom's method helps in becoming an expert through thinking.
01:59 Memorize the basics and understand the why behind them
02:59 Understanding and application are key to expertise.
04:00 Develop critical thinking skills
05:05 Develop critical thinking skills for success
06:07 Use the skills to create something original.
07:14 Practice problem-solving to enhance skills and knowledge
Crafted by Merlin AI.
thank you for such a useful video 💖💖
Maybe THE most valuable video I have EVER watched!!
Really?
Great subject. Rarely people discuss it. Keep it up.
Great video! Repetition and inate ability with a natural inclination is what I've found to work best in learning or mastering as I like to say anything!
Thank you
Thanks!
I've tried to learn a couple of topics with the taxonomy and it brought me to a great understanding and opened up new possibilities that I didn't have before applying it. I'm trying to invest at least a pomodoro in each of the levels. At the end since I'm approaching the topic from different angles, I understand the topic a lot better than staying at a single layer, which what I used to do before watching this video. So thanks a lot!
That's very generous of you. Thank you. Very pleased to read the concept is useful to you. Good luck with the studying 🙂
Thank you for your great videos
Great video, wish he would have went through all the steps of bloom but overall, very helpful info
For me, analysing text or whatever is key. It provides you with effort and imaginative details to connect to dots (and usually l far too complex than what eventually turns out to be the actual working facts) once you get to full understanding.
Analysing a text or task immediately also speeds up the reading and reflection. But that's not always wise if you're using machinery or firearms.
Step 1: So...I will never be an expert at anything. I don't remember by memorisation, I remember by comprehending. If I don't understand the Why, I won't remember the What. Step 2 and 4 need to come first for me, or Step 1 won't happen.
Very Good! We need everyone to learn how to 'Critically Think' on everything they do or exposed to. Have done these steps, but probably not as methodically as I could, this video and your delivery of the steps will have me doing better. Thank You!
The reason the world is as it is revolves around most people's inability to perform critical thinking.
Qualityyy video! The structure, the simple and funny examples, the learnings, short.
I usually ask all why kind of questions to chat gpt to improve understanding. Sometimes i do ask him about his take if i replace ingredient X with Y. Its fun
Exploring diverse languages can greatly enhance your knowledge. For those embarking on solo learning endeavors, helpful tools like Duolingo, DeepL, Immersive Translate, and others can be invaluable companions on the journey.
it is somewhat good, but it something we all know, may be we skip a step, but still we adopt our own structure or order and possibly become an expert in many skills already that we use it daily.
It sounds more academic to me.
But ofcouse it might of use at some point.
This is a brilliant video. Thank you.
Thank you for this video
Talent and hard work is required in any type of success, you cannot exclude one or the other.
Finally, I am subscribing.
Thank you.
Unique ❤ way to teach 3:20
Thank you friend, very useful video.
excellent
excellent!
LOL, "if you are like me and don't have any friends."
Thanks
merci !
I am trying to learn because I have been taught such passion ways of learning and cramming. So it's challenging for me to know about make it stick and Uncommon Sense by Barbara Oakley. I struggle with applying skills or what I have learned or trying to understand what I have just read. Do you recommend I go through Critical Thinking skills by Palgrave?
Hello sir big fan of ur’s work and I appreciate it will just go in college in few months doing python as my first language can u pls suggest one book which would have all things have seen ur videos but I am little confused
Gracias
Could u give an example how u would disect code and how u would analyze it in a video follow-up? I have always been interested in the idea of bloom's taxonomy but never could see how it would fit into coding.
With code, you would be describing what it is doing, describing what you're allowed to put into it, what limitations there are on the section of code and how various changes might be made to impact the performance in different ways. You'd also want to describe and contrast the impact of different algorithms and how the code might function differently if you use different types of loops or if you ordered switch statements in a different order.
The analysis is relatively similar to what you might do if you needed to teach a new coder how this section fo code works in order to hand the job of maintaining it over to them.
Dude flashes a cassette tape like an absolute mad lad. I'll subscribe just for that.
New subscriber always watching your videos very interesting❤❤❤
This is a super cute video
That I passed on. Wished it would’ve been taught this way a long time ago!
As always, very good insights in your videos. It is always a good investment to spend time in your channel.
I like the content and have subscribed.
The presentation and delivery of this video is excellent!
Low order thinking skills 3:26 remember understand doing
#7 refuting and paradigmshifting
Like Einstein!
seems interesting
I couldn't help but notice that you're a fellow fountain pen user. Nice.
That makes three of us. Good catch, by the way!
The motivation comes from the higher order thinking then come down and learn the details
I don't mean to brag, but I've got a PhD in Spaghetti Carbonara-nomics. It's not just a dish, it's a lifestyle, and I've mastered it to the point where I can twirl pasta like a pro and savor every bacony, creamy bite. Call me the Carbonara Connoisseur! 😋
Great content as always, could use more details instead of explaining the literal meanings of the steps. Thanks.
I don't understand the difference between steps "understand" and "analyze", both require me to ask why. Can someone explain? How is the process different?
analyzing goes deeper. You dont only understand this specific Part of the General Topic you want to learn, but understand how it is related to other concepts of the general Topic. for cooking, you understand that adding parmesan cheese on top of spaghetti is a good way to add to the overall taste. But do you understand, why this specific topping fits with this dish? are there dishes where adding this topping is a bad idea? why?
*Remembering* : a thing like an apple exists; it is something round and has a color, we can cut it into smaller pieces if we need to. What properties does an apple have? This is just raw information like "Paris is the capital of France".
*Understanding* : an apple is a type of fruit, a food, therefore we can eat it. It can rot and perish if not consumed in days. Meaning comes from knowing what it does and what we can do with it.
*Apply* : we know how to eat a raw apple, we know how to plant a tree with it. We know how to create deserts like an apple pie. We know how to solve a certain problem with apples. Not simply the knowledge of what can be done, but actually the know-how knowledge.
*Analyse* : how does apple taste compare with another kind of apple? Is it more acidic? How does an apple compare with other kinds of fruits? You simply compare and look for relationships.
*Evaluate* : After making apple pies with various kinds of apples, I can assert that certain kinds of apples are better than others for the job. I can judge why one is better than the other. There's a sense of value scale.
*Create* : You genetically modify an apple tree to produce the best apple for apple pie purposes. You know so much that you are capable of producing something new.
@@pedroteixeira5210 Yes, and sometimes you just need to know that something is the case. This is either because it's completely arbitrary like an assigned phone number back before you could choose. Or, it can also be because the explanation of why it is the case involves a lot of things that are much too complicated for the current class. That happens a lot in math and science where the simplified version isn't so bad, but the actual mechanism that causes it requires a lot more studied to understand.
Analysis is the process of identifying the components or building blocks of a thing. It’s not that mysterious really. It’s often confused with synthesis, or putting those building blocks together in a way that explains or aids understanding in others.
Go to 6:10 to see the triangle of Bloom's Taxonomy. 🤩
Me estoy volviendo adicta a tu canal.
How do you even decide to become an expert on a topic you don't know anything about?
Man, huge respect, the way he taught us, what justin sung couldnt teach, Thank you sir, forever grateful.
Maslow pyramid
PDCA and CI process?
This is an interesting interpretation of how one MIGHT use Bloom's Taxonomy, but it is NOT what Bloom presented!!! These 6 varieties of thinking/knowing are not steps or stages, but simply varieties... Bloom does not present them as things to be acquired in order, either. You made this up on your own!!!
i agree, i find the whole premise quite interpretive and trying to apply linearity to it doesn't make much sense to me. But he didn't make this up himself, the pyramid he showed for instance is a common interpretation found online. This pyramid doesn't look very useful to me as it's not necessarily the most logical in terms of structuring or semantics. The terms are defined as separate categories but the semantic interpretation and definition of those words aren't mutually exclusive of each other. For example, the second step is called "understanding" but that is completely relative because comprehension itself has several layers to it. At it's most superficial layer, "understanding" is accepting something as real or the supposed reality of it despite having a very limited grasp of it or experience. Just like how everyday people on the street will have an understanding of how biology works, how science works, astronomy, etc from school or in general, while still lacking the ability to fully or even mostly comprehend the subject, which then begs the question what does one really mean by "understanding", as there are multiple levels to it. it's inclusion on the pyramid feels contrived. In fact, you could easily argue that one could redefine the whole pyramid itself as the "pyramid of understanding", as every step proves a different level of understanding.
Not to mention evaluate and analyse. You can't evaluate something without analyzing it, and on the flip side how do you specifically analyse something without ever forming any sort of evaluation? We are not computers who just do things without reason. Logically, we ofcourse analyse things because we seek to form evaluations to reach conclusions, the act of trying to evaluate something is what prompts analysis to begin with. "Creating" also feels contrived and i would argue should be folded under "applying".
You could rearrange this pyramid in all sorts of ways and it still have it make somewhat sense. but personally, i think the best interpretation of this particular pyramid should just simply be:
*remembering -> analysing -> understanding -> applying (proof of understanding)*
When each topic acquires a scientific connotation, then as if by magic the latin words disappear and the text is filled with Greek words.
Есть множество вещей, которым можно научиться повторяя что-то изо дня в день, это вычитал где-то, не мои слова
Hi Python Programmer,
I've heard some worrying things about AI potentially replacing programmers, especially after comments from NVIDIA's CEO. As I'm considering admission in CSE, I'm uncertain due to these concerns. What's your take on this? I trust your insight.
Also, I'd appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on this topic via video.Your expertise would be invaluable.
Thanks, Rabby
Do you used to work in television like BBC? 😁 I like your videos they're like a documentary and it's pragmatic
Hey, even Bing needs some love.
Bruh. We really just gonna let him roast us like that with that quote "Critical thinking is not criticizing everyone because your great at there rubbish if you want that Twitter, Reddit, or Stack Overflow is the place for you." This quote had me laughing way too hard.
“and they’re”
“If like me, you don’t have any friends” 😂😂
Very nice looking yourvideo
I am from indonesian
My work would love us to be experts in 5 different subjects so they never have to employ more staff
What makes a good carbonara is having an angry Italian next you haha!
Expertise has always been a noun and was never a verb!!!
Great video BUT you use guanciale and not pancetta, some italians may not take that lightly :)
Used to make the same mistake
1:17
He confuses TAXONOMY (rules of categorization or classification) with TAXIDERMY (he art of preparing, stuffing, and mounting the skins of animals).
RIP Mr Men cassette at 1m15s 😭
Did you use AI for this? The image for step 3 says “APPYY”
Yes, I dunno about you but I find those AI generated images distracting and offputting.
Yes but it says Apply, the last Y is Y AND L :-D
You don't use pancetta for carbonara, you use guanciale.
Me as an educator: oh dear god not bloom’s again!
Blooms
You overcooked the chef analogy a little bit.
What do you mean you don't have any friends, you have all of us... which are not exactly your friends, but we do enjoy spending time with you... indirectly
I cant remember things that well so well im doomed
😂😂😂 Just try
Just keep practicing and try out on real use cases or made up use case... Don't make it so complicated
Bloom's Taxonomy interesting... hmmmm
The real question is how to become an expert Expert! The most expertest expert ever! Or if you’re an American, you can just identify as one! Because we all know they don’t have any expert’s in biology!
Within the first 3 minutes I figured this video was about Nothing! Well, thanks anyway!
Professional > expert. Earn a living doing something =\= knowledgeable on something. You would not think someone to be an expert if he could not distinguish a fake case to be a real one. Money, Identity, for example medicine ,software, malware may kill you. Pilot, driver, doctor might be required to response within short time very often with limited information. You may be able to climb up the the top of the world, well with the support of local guide latest technology, the local guides carrying your life supporting equipment living at high attitude for hundreds of generation for thousands of year. Very few people can survive Amazon forest, desert, the peak, the poles. The point is that you just you don't have to / need. I think 90% of the solider would ... in a war
What on earth are you on about mate
Pyramids, and rainbows, now, pyramids that are rainbows. Hmm
By YouSum Live
00:00:20 Benjamin Bloom's research unveils six steps to expertise.
00:00:32 Bloom's taxonomy provides a structured path to mastery.
00:02:20 Understanding precedes expertise; ask why and explain thoroughly.
00:02:53 Practical application is crucial in mastering any skill.
00:03:31 Critical thinking elevates expertise beyond mere knowledge retention.
00:05:36 Evaluating outcomes and critiquing others are hallmarks of expertise.
00:06:36 Creation of original work signifies true expertise attainment.
By YouSum Live
In short: you have to be of an analytical nature.
But how and why? How does someone make a choice, that their entire life is just going to revolve around THAT THING? their time, their other countless desires, their desire to have sex, eat food with friends, buy a car, go to Indonesia and say what's up? WHY?
What that sounds like is just...mediocrity mixed with animal desire. Is it just lack of creativity or drive that let's someone pick THAT disk of food they want to learn? When I was a child, I wanted to be a policeman, fireman, and chef (as well as a Ninja Turtle). WHY ARE YOU ALL ABLE TO JUST OUT OF NOWHERE DECIDE YOUR ENTIRE LIVES INSTANTLY THROUGH ONE AND ONLY ONE VERB!?
Oversimplification and trivialising won't get you very far unless you are selling training materials.
This isn't how it works for everyone.
What you're seeing in this video is the same mindset that created the modern school systems throughout the world, and it's a failure for many.