the oxygen change was negligible, try measuring CO2, I've read a book about breathing and there was an experiment with fast and slow breathing, the oxigen level didnt change, but CO2 level did. The book is called "Breath: the new science of a lost art" edit: I'd also measure the volume of air being breathed in since that's what the device suposedly improves
@@barebevil. No I'm a fan of the series and I really enjoy it however keeping a gojo pfp is very weird imo. But it's not weird enough for me to change it. However it is weird enough for me to never tell people ik irl that this is my CZcams acc
As a doctor I inform you guys that it will create more open space in your nostril for dust to enter and in a long run it will cause severe damage to your lungs
@@michielvantoor4667I desperately need that for my deviated septum. My horrible allergies combined with it make my life hell and I can barely ever breathe normally.
@@Cifteli You're wrong. The minimum blood oxygen level should be 95%, but it can go up to 100%. Of course, this isn't common because as far as I know, the average is 98%. There are a few exceptions, for exaple lung diseases like pneumonia. Hope this helps and please do not be overly toxic next time.❤
@@Arno-qq9qh also, you can see it through the amount he lost. Since he lost 5% on the first and 4% on the second try, this means the breathing enhancer made him lose 20% less oxygen 👀
these already exist as nasal strips. little bandaid type things with a somewhat rigid spine that goes across your nose. theyre handy for stuffy noses! a little irritating to wear at first, but no different than this would be :p
Well 1% difference is nothing taking into acount margin of error of the reading and the fact the change can be caused by different factors. In conclusion, this device might do absolutely nothing but more tests should be conducted.
Well I think the best way to do it is, get a sample of let's say 2 sets 30 exercise measurements. 30 should be done with the device and 30 should be done without the device. (n = 30, k = 2) Now we have 2 sample groups, and we can assume the distributions of those groups are normally distributed around a certain value. (Because n > 30, we can apply the Central Limit Theorem) Using these distributions we can extract their means (x_1 and x_2) , and their standard deviations (s_1 and s_2). From there we have all we need to perform a hypothesis test. A good test would be a Two Sample T-test (without the assumption of equal variance). The degrees of freedom, df = n1 + n2 - 2 = 30 + 30 - 2 = 58. The alternative hypothesis, what we want to determine to be true is that, the mean oxygen levels of the distribution using the device is larger than the mean oxygen levels without. The null hypothesis is that the true means , are the same, that there is no difference. Now obviously if you're not familiar with statistical tests you won't get what I mean when I say the "true means" of the distribution. Well obviously what we sample the means to be will likely differ from each other a little bit. The nature of sampling is that it doesn't tell you the ground truth of the distribution. For example, you could sample a poll for a specific city and sample a proportion of many people disagree/agree with a policy, but it won't tell you the actual proportions from the entire population. Therefore your sampled results will differ from the real population numbers/parameters. The same principle applies here. It's likely our oxygen sample means from the 2 groups won't be the same, so the hypothesis test is done to confirm whether the difference in what we sampled is significantly different enough that we can rule out the null assumption that the difference was just random sampling error and doesn't indicate using the device or not using the device changed anything. So we have it: (1 = No device using, 2 = Using device distribution) Null hypothesis/H_0: x_1 = x_2 Alternative hypothesis/H_A: x_2 > x_1 While doing the test you'd calculate the test statistic, which is basically like a z-score, but we're using it on a t-distrubution which adjusts values based on the degrees of freedom. We use the test statistic as a way of figuring out how extreme a value is if we assume the null hypothesis is true. Like let's say we have a bell curve split into 3 sections, the first section are reserved for test statistics that veer way off of what's expected for the hypothesis, in that, it's way smaller that expected. The middle section is the section of test statistics which veer off the hypothesis, but not so much that you'd say it's statistically significant, and the last section are for extreme values which are much larger than you are willing to allow. Since our alternative hypothesis is x_2 > x_1, we will only consider it significant if our test statistics is in the far end of the distribution, the part we consider too extreme for being too large. We aren't concerned with it being extremely small, because that would validate another alternative hypothesis, not the one we're making. test statistic = t = (x_2 - x_1)/ sqrt(s1/n1 + s2/n2) Intuitively you should see that if x_1 and x_2 were the same, it'd validate the null hypothesis perfectly. There would be no need to investigate if x_2 is statistically significantly larger. You should also see that, the larger x_2 is than x_1, the more it moves to the right end of the bell curve, and as that happens, the probability of getting a value like that or even more extreme (assuming the null is true) decreases. The area to the right of this score in the curve will tell you how likely it is to get a value more extremely large than what the null entailed. Additionally, you should see that if the standard deviations of the distributions become larger, the test statistic becomes less extreme. It makes sense because if the distributions varied all over the place, the probability that your sampled values don't match the actual population parameter increases, therefore values which deviate from it should be considered less extreme and more probable, which is what happens when the t-score is closer to the middle part of the bell curve. So you would use the t-table, with df = 58, and then use your test statistic to find the area to the right of the test statistic, on that distribution using it as like a t-score. The area to the right in this case will be considered our P-value. The P-value or probability value tells you the probability of getting a value as extreme as yours or even more extreme than yours under the assumption the null is true. Now like I said earlier there will be a threshold of how extreme of values you're willing to allow. I mean technically it's possible to get 98 heads on flipping a fair coin 100 times, but it's very unlikely. But like if you were to say something like, "bruh, the probability of this happening on a fair coin is less than 5%, this is clearly statistically significant enough for me to say the coin isn't fair" then that would be statistically valid. Statisticians typically like to use a significance threshold of 5%. It's pretty arbitrary, but it's the same as saying "I want it to fall within the range that I'm 95% confident that it's a result I'd see under the null hypothesis." Anyways, long digression aside. If our P-value is less than 5%, we'll say it's significant enough to say that we reject the null hypothesis, and that there's significant evidence for the alternative. That is, in our case, there's significant evidence that the true average blood oxygen levels after wearing the device is larger than the average blood oxygen levels not wearing it when working out. Similarly, if the P-value is greater than 5%, it's in the range of values we are confident in saying it aligns with the null hypothesis. Therefore we fail to reject the null hypothesis, because it's not significantly significant. It's the equivalent of saying, "like sure it might be an unfair coin but 50.05% heads vs 49.95% tails on 30 samples isn't enough evidence for me to be confident about it y'know". So in this case we'd say there's insufficient evidence to conclude there is any difference in true average blood levels wearing the device or not. Now note there is a caveat to be mentioned with our conclusions. This can be considered an experiment because we manipulated wearing the device and not wearing the device, so we CAN make causal inferences. However these causal inferences can only be made concerning this specific person, unless we sample randomly from the entire population and put them through the same experiment we cannot extrapolate our results to the population.
As a respiratory therapist this is honestly one of the dumbesr products I have ever seen. 1. You need to have oxygen to increase your O2 sat or saturation (well duh) can either be done by inhaling medical grade oxygen (what you find at hospital or home care) or by taking deeper breaths quite literally. Tell my patients all the time to take some deep breaths in because it WILL increase your sat if low(know he taped his mouth but if he didn't he could have pursed lip breathing which essentially opens up your airways something we do for our COPD patients.) For him with a O2 sat of 95 that's perfect don't need to be at 100% anything from 90 to 100 is fine. 2. You literally don't need to spend money to flare out your nostrils, when you can do this subconciously while breathing. Hope this helps!!!
@@adamrutz6655 it is, we have some paramed students that we orient for resp. and they are taught the same thing. Resp school says 90 is good but nursing and emt/paramedics are taught something else. Don't know why they all can't agree one something but yea lol.
Hello! Newer rad student here, I was just wondering if the magnets themselves could cause a risk to the patient if they’re inhaled. I tend to toss and turn in my sleep, so I could see myself and others like me knocking the magnets off track and possibly inhaling them. I’m sure these magnets aren’t strong enough to do too much damage, but hypothetically if it were stronger would it pose a risk to the user? I’ve been seeing a lot of lung scans lately and I find the respiratory system and esophagrams super interesting!
@@Elirue02 I feel like it you wouldn't be able to inhale it since its not near your mouth, but if you toss and turn in your sleep I feel like it would most likely fall off your face and stay in bed with you. But if the magnets were stronger they could cause pressure injuries to the cartilage of the nose. If you somehow aspirate on this and inhale a magnet, you would need a bronchoscopy to remove it considering it is not sterile and supposed to be there, plus you could walk away with an infection as well. It also looks like its an adhesive as well but I don't know lol.
@@colinbinette thank you!! I didn’t notice the adhesive until you mentioned it lol. I thought they were taped inside the nostril, which I couldn’t see sticking very well lol 😂
although the area of your nostrils increases by using it, the equation of continuity for fluids dictates that the increase in area is accompanied by decrease in the speed with which the air enters. You’ll know this fact if you try blowing out of your mouth; once with it almost shut and once with it wide open; the speed with which the air comes out will be different. All this time say the Volume of air entering your nose should remain pretty much the same in either case.
Actually, you would need to do it at separate times. As you did it shortly after the first test, youre body already soakes more oxygen because the muscles have a heavier blood flow, so youre lungs already get you more oxygen. So you will breathe "more" but the lungs are the key to get more oxygen in youre blood
I wear a nose strip at night for sleep. I keep it on in the morning during my work out and take it off before i shower. I get them on sale at Costco, but walmart generic is good price too.
The place this can actually help is by reducing the resistance to airflow, causing your diaphragm to use less energy to expand and contract your lungs.
I wear a variable of these to go to bed every night. My family has a history of sleep apnea and I have small nostrils that sometimes make it difficult to breathe through my nose. They’re adhesive strips, the magnetic part of it is more for show I think, but regardless they work great for small noses👍 lol. Would really recommend for sleeping and exercising, you can find them in any local pharmacy. (At least from my limited knowledge) they’re called nasal strips.
I can literally do this manually. I can't control it all the time. But when I focus I can hold it like that for a few minutes. I can also make it go ⏺️⚪⏺️⚪⏺️⚪⏺️.
The ending has me cracking up 🤣👹
same lol
I got scared😭
It scared me
Caught me off guard-
Sean where do i buy these
My man can’t even talk when he’s being held at gunpoint😭
Yeah
No
Maybe
Maybe not
Perhaps
"AND FOLLOW ME 👹"
OR ELSE 👹
I WILL👹
INVADE YOUR HOUSE 👹
PUT A SPIDER 👹
INTO YOUR 👹
For anyone wondering it’s mostly targeted towards bikers due to the wind commonly keeping the nose shut
White people problems
This makes much more sense, because if you had a condition like rhinitis it wouldn't help at all, since you're just expanding your nostrils
helmet left the chat
Exactly, although I use those to sleep because when I lie down my nose usually gets blocked and I wake up choking, they are very useful 😃👍
It was actually made for obstructive sleep apnea syndrom(osas) but not effective... Not a least
Us people with big nostrils don’t need that
When our nostrils flare, we can smell the whole city.😂
Real like i wonder how people with small nostrils are able to breath, Like do they use their mouthes or something 😭
That until we get infected by the flu
@@Stereogagadamn man. Don’t make it personal 😭
@@spaceweathernewstoday8665 😭😭😭
the oxygen change was negligible, try measuring CO2,
I've read a book about breathing and there was an experiment with fast and slow breathing, the oxigen level didnt change, but CO2 level did. The book is called "Breath: the new science of a lost art"
edit: I'd also measure the volume of air being breathed in since that's what the device suposedly improves
That's interesting. I wish the guy sees this comment
@@devattemptinfinite4332 satoru gojo?
@@barebevil. Man I put this pfp up a very long time ago. I'm too lazy to change it 😅
@@devattemptinfinite4332 why change it you dont like jujutsu kaisen?
@@barebevil. No I'm a fan of the series and I really enjoy it however keeping a gojo pfp is very weird imo. But it's not weird enough for me to change it. However it is weird enough for me to never tell people ik irl that this is my CZcams acc
"Your body uses oxygen"
noo i thought it was sulfuric acid 😭😭
Sulfur smells terrible 🥶🥶🥶
Waiting for someone to get r/whooooshed
LUKE DAVIDSON line right there my friend 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@GachaUserHerer/whoosh
@@checken-chicken why?
As a doctor I inform you guys that it will create more open space in your nostril for dust to enter and in a long run it will cause severe damage to your lungs
if u do it in a cleaner environment such as ur house?
Bro dust particles will still enter and there is a chance that small bacteria can also get in
@@J44T damn it, so I can't buy the scammy breathing enchancer 😔
Ya you shouldn't instead try 'anuloma pranyam' a breathing practice in fresh air
@@J44TYou ain't a doc if you say bro
me acsedently inhaling the magnet
The ending had me 😭
💀
Follow me 👹
When he put the duct tape over his mouth, I really thought this was going to turn into a fainting speedrun
I also thought that😂
1 reply but 2k likes? Lemme fix that
Bro ate oxygen to say "and follow me" 😂😂
Bro went full Batman
It’s all shits and giggles until somebody farts
1985: we will have flying cars in 2024
2024: breathing enhancer
As someone who has a blocked nose 24/7 I see this as an absolute win 😂
257 likes and no reply? Let me fix that (btw I can relate to having a blocked nose all the time😂😂😂)
345 likes and 1 reply? Let me fix that
i have a deviated septum so i agree
@@PogChokeI recently had surgery done to fix my deviated septum and oh my god i can finally sleep now😅
@@michielvantoor4667I desperately need that for my deviated septum. My horrible allergies combined with it make my life hell and I can barely ever breathe normally.
all that for a 1 percent improvement lol
Remember he taped his mouth SHUT to only breath from the nostrils.
Game is game
@@Cifteli You're wrong. The minimum blood oxygen level should be 95%, but it can go up to 100%. Of course, this isn't common because as far as I know, the average is 98%.
There are a few exceptions, for exaple lung diseases like pneumonia.
Hope this helps and please do not be overly toxic next time.❤
@@Arno-qq9qh mb sorry I shouldve double checked 😔
@@Arno-qq9qh also, you can see it through the amount he lost. Since he lost 5% on the first and 4% on the second try, this means the breathing enhancer made him lose 20% less oxygen 👀
“Breath Air” 🗣️
“AnD fOlLoW mE” 👹👺👹👺👹👺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
💀💀💀
Bro copied the top comment ☠️
@@BuffedAcheron 1. No I did not
2. It’s not the top comment
@@megagaming20 3. You edited it ☠️
@@BuffedAcheron yep, to add those crying emojis or whatever they are
I need that for when im sick
goes crazy when stuffed nose 🔥🔥🪦⚰️
@@Deterail thats what i assumed it was for in the first place 😂
reallll I was also thinking at night bc my nose always gets stuffy
these already exist as nasal strips. little bandaid type things with a somewhat rigid spine that goes across your nose. theyre handy for stuffy noses! a little irritating to wear at first, but no different than this would be :p
@@swishyb woah thats cool, thanks!
The, "And follow me!" cought me off guard and had me dying 🤣
bro said "AND FOLLOW ME👹" in the most devilish way possible LOL
Well 1% difference is nothing taking into acount margin of error of the reading and the fact the change can be caused by different factors.
In conclusion, this device might do absolutely nothing but more tests should be conducted.
These apple watches cant exactly measure the perfect rates, if you want to see a huge difference try Co2 tester
bro in ap stats
Well I think the best way to do it is, get a sample of let's say 2 sets 30 exercise measurements. 30 should be done with the device and 30 should be done without the device. (n = 30, k = 2)
Now we have 2 sample groups, and we can assume the distributions of those groups are normally distributed around a certain value. (Because n > 30, we can apply the Central Limit Theorem)
Using these distributions we can extract their means (x_1 and x_2) , and their standard deviations (s_1 and s_2).
From there we have all we need to perform a hypothesis test. A good test would be a Two Sample T-test (without the assumption of equal variance). The degrees of freedom, df = n1 + n2 - 2 = 30 + 30 - 2 = 58.
The alternative hypothesis, what we want to determine to be true is that, the mean oxygen levels of the distribution using the device is larger than the mean oxygen levels without.
The null hypothesis is that the true means , are the same, that there is no difference.
Now obviously if you're not familiar with statistical tests you won't get what I mean when I say the "true means" of the distribution. Well obviously what we sample the means to be will likely differ from each other a little bit. The nature of sampling is that it doesn't tell you the ground truth of the distribution. For example, you could sample a poll for a specific city and sample a proportion of many people disagree/agree with a policy, but it won't tell you the actual proportions from the entire population. Therefore your sampled results will differ from the real population numbers/parameters. The same principle applies here. It's likely our oxygen sample means from the 2 groups won't be the same, so the hypothesis test is done to confirm whether the difference in what we sampled is significantly different enough that we can rule out the null assumption that the difference was just random sampling error and doesn't indicate using the device or not using the device changed anything.
So we have it:
(1 = No device using, 2 = Using device distribution)
Null hypothesis/H_0: x_1 = x_2
Alternative hypothesis/H_A: x_2 > x_1
While doing the test you'd calculate the test statistic, which is basically like a z-score, but we're using it on a t-distrubution which adjusts values based on the degrees of freedom. We use the test statistic as a way of figuring out how extreme a value is if we assume the null hypothesis is true. Like let's say we have a bell curve split into 3 sections, the first section are reserved for test statistics that veer way off of what's expected for the hypothesis, in that, it's way smaller that expected. The middle section is the section of test statistics which veer off the hypothesis, but not so much that you'd say it's statistically significant, and the last section are for extreme values which are much larger than you are willing to allow.
Since our alternative hypothesis is x_2 > x_1, we will only consider it significant if our test statistics is in the far end of the distribution, the part we consider too extreme for being too large. We aren't concerned with it being extremely small, because that would validate another alternative hypothesis, not the one we're making.
test statistic = t = (x_2 - x_1)/ sqrt(s1/n1 + s2/n2)
Intuitively you should see that if x_1 and x_2 were the same, it'd validate the null hypothesis perfectly. There would be no need to investigate if x_2 is statistically significantly larger. You should also see that, the larger x_2 is than x_1, the more it moves to the right end of the bell curve, and as that happens, the probability of getting a value like that or even more extreme (assuming the null is true) decreases. The area to the right of this score in the curve will tell you how likely it is to get a value more extremely large than what the null entailed.
Additionally, you should see that if the standard deviations of the distributions become larger, the test statistic becomes less extreme. It makes sense because if the distributions varied all over the place, the probability that your sampled values don't match the actual population parameter increases, therefore values which deviate from it should be considered less extreme and more probable, which is what happens when the t-score is closer to the middle part of the bell curve.
So you would use the t-table, with df = 58, and then use your test statistic to find the area to the right of the test statistic, on that distribution using it as like a t-score.
The area to the right in this case will be considered our P-value. The P-value or probability value tells you the probability of getting a value as extreme as yours or even more extreme than yours under the assumption the null is true.
Now like I said earlier there will be a threshold of how extreme of values you're willing to allow. I mean technically it's possible to get 98 heads on flipping a fair coin 100 times, but it's very unlikely. But like if you were to say something like, "bruh, the probability of this happening on a fair coin is less than 5%, this is clearly statistically significant enough for me to say the coin isn't fair" then that would be statistically valid. Statisticians typically like to use a significance threshold of 5%. It's pretty arbitrary, but it's the same as saying "I want it to fall within the range that I'm 95% confident that it's a result I'd see under the null hypothesis."
Anyways, long digression aside. If our P-value is less than 5%, we'll say it's significant enough to say that we reject the null hypothesis, and that there's significant evidence for the alternative. That is, in our case, there's significant evidence that the true average blood oxygen levels after wearing the device is larger than the average blood oxygen levels not wearing it when working out.
Similarly, if the P-value is greater than 5%, it's in the range of values we are confident in saying it aligns with the null hypothesis. Therefore we fail to reject the null hypothesis, because it's not significantly significant. It's the equivalent of saying, "like sure it might be an unfair coin but 50.05% heads vs 49.95% tails on 30 samples isn't enough evidence for me to be confident about it y'know". So in this case we'd say there's insufficient evidence to conclude there is any difference in true average blood levels wearing the device or not.
Now note there is a caveat to be mentioned with our conclusions. This can be considered an experiment because we manipulated wearing the device and not wearing the device, so we CAN make causal inferences. However these causal inferences can only be made concerning this specific person, unless we sample randomly from the entire population and put them through the same experiment we cannot extrapolate our results to the population.
@@allstar4065 Well I didn't understand a lot and it was very long but it was one of the most impressive things I've ever read and didn't understand😅
Damn allstar is the scientist Rick
Me who saw a 1% improvement at blood oxygen: **Bangs credit card to the table**
Probably helps get rid of co2
it’s better than nothing
@@Borrito165wrong
the end "AnD FoLLOW MEH👹" had me dying😭
That "AND FOLLOW ME" came personally💀
The "AND FOLLOW ME👹👹" was personal
Bro went from a normal person to a demon at the end
oh no it will be used for the next trend looks minimizing
THE END BRO IT'S SO FUNNY😭💀
My mind: THIS TIME I WANT U U U U U LIKE THIS MAGNETICCCC!! 👹
As a respiratory therapist this is honestly one of the dumbesr products I have ever seen. 1. You need to have oxygen to increase your O2 sat or saturation (well duh) can either be done by inhaling medical grade oxygen (what you find at hospital or home care) or by taking deeper breaths quite literally. Tell my patients all the time to take some deep breaths in because it WILL increase your sat if low(know he taped his mouth but if he didn't he could have pursed lip breathing which essentially opens up your airways something we do for our COPD patients.) For him with a O2 sat of 95 that's perfect don't need to be at 100% anything from 90 to 100 is fine.
2. You literally don't need to spend money to flare out your nostrils, when you can do this subconciously while breathing.
Hope this helps!!!
I'm an EMT and we've been taught anything under 94 we count as mild hypoxia but don't know whether that's just something we learned for ems or what
@@adamrutz6655 it is, we have some paramed students that we orient for resp. and they are taught the same thing. Resp school says 90 is good but nursing and emt/paramedics are taught something else. Don't know why they all can't agree one something but yea lol.
Hello! Newer rad student here, I was just wondering if the magnets themselves could cause a risk to the patient if they’re inhaled. I tend to toss and turn in my sleep, so I could see myself and others like me knocking the magnets off track and possibly inhaling them. I’m sure these magnets aren’t strong enough to do too much damage, but hypothetically if it were stronger would it pose a risk to the user? I’ve been seeing a lot of lung scans lately and I find the respiratory system and esophagrams super interesting!
@@Elirue02 I feel like it you wouldn't be able to inhale it since its not near your mouth, but if you toss and turn in your sleep I feel like it would most likely fall off your face and stay in bed with you. But if the magnets were stronger they could cause pressure injuries to the cartilage of the nose. If you somehow aspirate on this and inhale a magnet, you would need a bronchoscopy to remove it considering it is not sterile and supposed to be there, plus you could walk away with an infection as well. It also looks like its an adhesive as well but I don't know lol.
@@colinbinette thank you!! I didn’t notice the adhesive until you mentioned it lol. I thought they were taped inside the nostril, which I couldn’t see sticking very well lol 😂
Bro can finally breath in 4k
"and follow me", dumbledore said calmly
Buddy hit the "the idea is simple" 💀
That "Follow me" was violent.💀💀💀
BOYS! THE PLAN IS SIMPLE - Ludwig
the ending got me tho 💀
although the area of your nostrils increases by using it, the equation of continuity for fluids dictates that the increase in area is accompanied by decrease in the speed with which the air enters. You’ll know this fact if you try blowing out of your mouth; once with it almost shut and once with it wide open; the speed with which the air comes out will be different. All this time say the Volume of air entering your nose should remain pretty much the same in either case.
"All that for a drop of Oxygen!" -Thanos
"AND FOLLOW ME👹" that was so funny😂
Bros neighbors probably think he’s a psychopath
That ending caught me off guard
Bro sounded like Camman18 at the end💀💀💀
Bro got me so scared to tell me to follow but I’m already following
"AnD fOlLoW mE!!" 💀😂
Bro changed his race🪦
the black nose modpack is crazy 😂
Bro has the freddy fazbear nose💀😭
Imma remember this.
@@SeanAndrewwwhoa should I be concerned
@@jaydenleckpa8381 probably not👍
@@SeanAndrewwdbkdbw
Nahh...his boogers be living in a mansion
This man has a very good job
It’s true! Im lucky and grateful for you all
He is breathing in 4K now.
Actually, you would need to do it at separate times. As you did it shortly after the first test, youre body already soakes more oxygen because the muscles have a heavier blood flow, so youre lungs already get you more oxygen. So you will breathe "more" but the lungs are the key to get more oxygen in youre blood
The green screen guy😂:
😮
yo that’s so cool where did u get it
The end when he yelled, my mind said this wat the he double hockey sticks
I' m watching this without sound and the caption make this sound like a adult comedy show
POV: When you go to bed and 1 of your nostrils gets clogged up for no reason.
We need this...
Nah bro that ending actually jumpscared me i was literally half asleep💀
Imagine seeing this guy, while walking down the street.
My stuffy nostrils will definitely need this
I need this to take deeper breaths ⛷️⛷️⛷️
Me watching this while already having a wide Nose 😂
Bro thinks he’s from Dune
I wear a nose strip at night for sleep. I keep it on in the morning during my work out and take it off before i shower. I get them on sale at Costco, but walmart generic is good price too.
If the villagers in Minecraft took it from this, the world would run out of oxygen
The "AnD fOLLoW Me" is making me roll on the floor🤣 🤣
I got one of those built-in 🤣🤣🤣
Def those who have asthma need this.
Bro released his demons on accident
If that's just a pulsometer I have a pretty expensive one.. and it changes almost every time between 92-98% so 1% isn't even really a change imo.
"what is you think of these 🤔"
"AND FOLLOW ME-👹👹👺👺👺👺"
I feel like the 1% increase could very well be a coincidence
Yes, anything from 94-99 is normal, this is just a coincidence.
@cookielover7545 the guy in the video really thought it affected air quality 😂
The place this can actually help is by reducing the resistance to airflow, causing your diaphragm to use less energy to expand and contract your lungs.
i didnt think i wasnt the only one that turned into a pepper when exercising
I wear a variable of these to go to bed every night. My family has a history of sleep apnea and I have small nostrils that sometimes make it difficult to breathe through my nose. They’re adhesive strips, the magnetic part of it is more for show I think, but regardless they work great for small noses👍 lol.
Would really recommend for sleeping and exercising, you can find them in any local pharmacy. (At least from my limited knowledge) they’re called nasal strips.
Just be black ;) **breathes in 4k**
Asians too have the same nose shape
At least east and south east
Pass
bro looking like a dune character
that random videogame item that gives 1% stamina
Imagine a cop walking by💀☠️
Ah yes, thy 1 percentages of improvement, which with he shall then telleth us "FOLLOW ME", provoking thy population to follow thy lead
When one magnet gets stuck in your nose so far up you're like ill deal with it when it's a problem.
As a person with a big nose…
I see this an an absolute win 🏆✨✨🤧
“Few hours”
After the first session: 2:15
After second session: 3:10
The real question is not how much oxygen you had in you, it’s if you feel like it helped
Me with my already ginormous nose:
"Look what they have to do to mimic a fraction of my power"
starts breathing in 4k
Sean Andrew, This made me laugh so much! Thanks for sharing!
How did blud not have a single like 💀💀
Wdym@@LHPlaysTTD
What was fun in the vid ?
Is nobody gonna talk about he rested for a few hours 💀
I need this when i sleep at night 💀💀💀
Instructions unclear there is a magnet in my lungs
guys with big nose: I think I'm done with this
Me”does it come off??”
Him”oh..I haven’t thought about that I GOTTA GO!”
This would be insanely helpful for people with deviated septa
I can literally do this manually. I can't control it all the time. But when I focus I can hold it like that for a few minutes. I can also make it go ⏺️⚪⏺️⚪⏺️⚪⏺️.
same sometimes i do it without realizing
Wait, not everybody can control their nostrils??
@@PassTheSnails It's like being able to raise one eyebrow, move your ears and stuff like that. A lot of people can't do it but I think it's learnable.
Bro is like im a human well im gonna test am i actually a human 💀💀💀
Its supposed to be for people whose nose is either blocked, small, or nostrils are small
The Ishowspeed kid won’t never need this
I need this, sometimes my nostrils decide to be dumb and supply a bit less oxygen, so that'd balance it out a bit!
I would accidentally snort those magnets up after the first jump
As someone with very bad asthama i i need this😭
I think that's amazing how you're with margin of error with this phenomenal piece of equipment
"AND FOLLOW ME👹👹" AWOOP JUMPSCARE