People with decent level specific maths and physics knowledge commenting 'this isn't that hard for university'. Um yeah, the point of this show is to test the contestants with specific knowledge over a wide range of topics. The fact you knew Pauli was responsible for the exclusion principle doesn't make you smarter than these guys. That's a specific piece of knowledge to that subject, which isn't general knowledge - and that's the point of the game.
and when talking about geometric means. he gave them the definition and like 2 questions later asked what the GM was of 2, 5, and 100. they got it wrong lol
Karl Pilkington has got this sussed! He enjoys playing University Challenge at home, not by answering the questions, but by guessing which egghead will answer each question. Genius!
Yeah, but they are under allot of pressure. Its easy to mock their mistakes when you sit at home watching. That said, not knowing about Ramanujan is disgraceful.
Still even under loads of a pressure, I'm pretty sure u can still realize that any number raised to an exponent is essentially positive. So why in the world did he get -10??
(Rant) I have a degree in maths and from personal experience, I think the actual computational maths problems are all around A-level maths/further maths standard, like something you would get in a Cambridge maths interview. Like the linear algebra/ Taylor expansion/elementary probably theory stuff which is further maths. On the other hand the knowledge based questions are pretty specialist (90% from 1st year material with a few harder exceptions) but you don't have to work anything out. The exceptions include the v-e+f=2 Euler equation I learnt in 3rd year discrete maths, and Cauchy, Laplace etc whose names I only got to know in 2nd year. I remember from another episode a question about the Lebesgue/Jordan measure which is definitely 3rd year probability theory. The other things like Mersenne primes, Riemann Hypothesis etc are basic knowledge for all keen high school students wanting to pursue mathematics. Also I managed to answer 4 physics questions from remembering my A-level physics classes, so I think they must be around the same level. This makes me feel much better now since most of the time I don't even understand the questions on the show that's not maths or classical music. But I guess it's manageable for people who study that particular subject. I'm still amazed at how these guys do maths problems so fast under pressure though👍🏼
You heard about Cauchy in your second year for the first time? This dude came up with the foundation of Analysis. If the Mathematics program you attended does not cover Analysis I (including among other topics: construction of the reals, sequences and convergence, (infinite) sums, continuity of functions, differentiation) it has to be a very shitty program.
+Sheldon Cooper I think I meant to say the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (and Laplace transforms), but shortened my point incorrectly. I know that some unis like Oxbridge teach it in first year, but as I did a combined degree we learnt it in 2nd year real analysis. Also would you like it if I were to call your degree shitty? We are all grown ups so please speak in a civil manner. FYI rankings tell me that my uni is one of the best in the world so I'm pretty sure the courses I took were far from 'shitty'.
+amesakurako: Great writeup, thank you. +Sheldon Cooper: stop the dumb trolling and get on the University Challenge program to prove what you know in a competitive pressure situation.
A lot of the questions are meant to just be really quick, off the cuff answers. I mean... One of the questions they just sounded off the definition of continuity in a topological space. I can't imagine they've never been exposed to it, I'm guessing it was nerves.
@@ralphinoful Hearing topological space and answering convex or concave means that they are guessing with whatever words they learned in preparation. Convexity has more or less nothing to do with topological spaces (unless you are in a convex topological vector space).
It was actually hardy who thought his cab number was uninteresting, and srivinasa said that it had those properties, or as the story goes, just goes to show these guys who don’t even study maths (most of them) still have heard of these things which I find so impressive, I only came here because I’m a maths student (with a keen interest in physics my diss is on star formation) to see whether I’d get many of them. Seems I’ve forgotten half of my degree already
That was a great deal of fun, but I have one tiny nit to pick (with the questioners). "Heisenberg's Cat" doesn't actually say that "the cat is simultaneously dead and alive" (although this is how it is often posed). Rather, it claims that the cat is _neither_ dead _nor_ alive until the measurement is made.
How is naming physicists, mathematicians, and chemical symbols based on bible testaments have anything to do math and physics?? I really hope this crap isn't on any exams in universities.
of course its not part of formal tests, but knowing about the history and progression of the topic is valuable and important when learning maths and various branches of the sciences
its not meant to be university level questions, rather such a broad variety of questions that it is very difficult even for university students. Also just because you may have answered these, dosen't mean you could compete in this as you need to know many areas (from maths to classical poetry) to even qualify for the team of most unis
Lots of keyboard warriors in the comments. I also got most of these rights, but when you're filmed and under pressure I guess it's a total different story. By the way science is about being amazed and trying to understand the world around you, it's not a dick size contest. Stop being so full of yourselves
Maybe when you have such a vast pool of notable scientists stored mentally, selecting the correct answer becomes less trivial than when only knowing the most obvious select few. That, or they be dumb.
Everyone here in the comments is wondering how they didn't know Ramanujan or Tesla, and I'm over here wondering how the fuck they didn't know the secant question. That's basic high school geometry/trigonometry.
47:04 Also, they did not realize that (m/s)² [velocity squared] does *NOT* give the same units as m/s² × m³ [acceleration times their answer of radius cubed].
10:45 What is the magnitude of the electric field inside the spherical shell Q and radius R? Phillips: "0" That is an outrageous result that I am still mad about. I can definitely show it numerically, I guess it makes sense numerically, but intuitively it feels so wrong, even though I can literally see the two sides cancelling out. Edit: The same result is true for gravity, by the way. Oh man, I miss university :(
How can there be a probability of 1 (ie certain to occur) that one of two half-possible events will occur (of two mutually exclusive events, each with only a probability of one half of occurring)? When say there's half a chance that coin A turns up heads when flipped- and half a chance that coin B turns up heads- it's DEFINITELY not certain that one of them will show heads. I must be misinterpreting the question.
Can someone please explain to me why the answer for the question starting around @24:40 is 3? My very fast guess would have been 0...(not considering negative integers though).
By Bezout's identity, the smallest positive integer that can be written as 375a + 147b (where a and b are integers) is also the greatest common factor of 375 and 147. They obviously share 3 and dividing 375 by 3 gives 5 cubed. Since 147 is not divisible by 5 and 375 has no other prime factors (as 3*5^3 is its prime factorisation), the greatest common factor must be 3.
Is it normal for University Challenge to recycle questions? The three follow up questions at 3:09 all appeared four years later in S47 with the exact same three awnsers.
It pisses me off that they're guessing all the historical figures based on a relatively small set of potential answers. "AN ITALIAN?? UHHH.. GALILEO I GUESS."
At 26:12 the guy get's it right but the host says he's wrong. The question had both metres and centimetres and the answer was 10cm but the contestant likely converted to meters (as any physicist would) and said the answer was 1/10 (of a metre) but the answer the host had was 10 (cm). The question didn't say what units to use.
Surely 5:40 is a perfectly good answer, just with x instead of y as the independent variable. Edit: I see he said "written as a function of y". Still kinda stupid though.
WTF NO ONE KNOWS RAMANUJAN !!!!!!!!!!
+Mario Mirdita More shockingly no one knew Tesla either.
Mario Mirdita I know right!
and Tesla too
+Korawich Kavee That was stated already.
And they're British!
Was laughing so hard when the guy said concave.
+safeman247 He was laughing himself...
I laughed for 20 seconds straight.
4:00
4:00
4:00
"Cosine"
No you lose five points. ....... Come on.
"Cosine?"
NO, SHE JUST SAID THAT.
Jesus, what the hell
what's the answer? even i thought it was cosine.
secant, its the reciprocal of cosine as he says Hyp/Add (i got it wrong too)
Sec
So many geniuses in the comment section as usual.
No one here is claiming to be a genius so shut up
How the hell did I get here
I was looking for Lindsay Lohan in a bikini yet ended up here somehow...
Tom Greg i was watching japanese anime funny moments and this was recommended
madzangels LMAOOO ME
Because HAPPAX LEGONAMONON
People with decent level specific maths and physics knowledge commenting 'this isn't that hard for university'. Um yeah, the point of this show is to test the contestants with specific knowledge over a wide range of topics.
The fact you knew Pauli was responsible for the exclusion principle doesn't make you smarter than these guys. That's a specific piece of knowledge to that subject, which isn't general knowledge - and that's the point of the game.
Eh, you'd wonder why these teams don't put at least one science-oriented person on their team, though.
@@ericzhan3454 most do lol
@@ericzhan3454dude science is still very broad... What a crude statement.
2+2 is 4
Minus 1 that's 3 quick maths.
Never in human history has a larger group of geniuses congregated than in these comments.
if you don't know the answer, just say the speed of light
XD Or pi/2
Or h bar/2
🤣
I love the mixture of "I feel dumb as fuck" and "these fuckers can't even divide in binary" in this comment section.
16:00: "cos ?" ... "NO. SHE JUST SAID THAT!!"
I have never felt as stupid as when i watched this
don't worry they also make really stupid mistakes 15:39
and when talking about geometric means. he gave them the definition and like 2 questions later asked what the GM was of 2, 5, and 100. they got it wrong lol
eric pelton And the girl says its a positive root.
Many of the questions just require knowledge/memorization of terms, theories, and history of math and physics.
don't worry. no real life application :P jk they live, breath, and eat math and physics.
I can't believe they didn't know the equality case of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality :(
Positive root of a 1000 wtfffff
Marko Mkd all their roots took way long to do...
seriously.. plus it would not be square root if there are three numbers..
Karl Pilkington has got this sussed! He enjoys playing University Challenge at home, not by answering the questions, but by guessing which egghead will answer each question. Genius!
Egg.
its 1:19 am. i have a programming final tomorrow and im watching this shit.
Awesome Comment of the Month Prize there
what tf does a programming final consist of
Ha 1:13 here what am I doing with my life
Theory of programming and writing code on paper
I'm 14 years old, homeless, and live in a drainage ditch with a family of raccoons yet I got most of these...
Tom Greg soo you were just lazy in school?
So you didn't get all of them. Very disappointing.
I haven't been born and I got all of these
I am a super intelligent AI capable of destroying the world yet I still got most of these...
Tom Greg ...by the look of your avatar, I’d say living in a drainage ditch does age one.
I was feeling quite stupid until 10:22 when literally 5 people couldn't work out the cube root of 1000
I was pretty surprised that Brits did not know about Ramanujan. I thought he would be famous there since he visited Cambridge.
very surprised how many i got right
"positive root of 1000".
Holy shit I lost it.
20:07 that was harsh! Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and (nuclear) Magnetic Resonance Imaging are the same bloody thing.
Harsh yes, but Paxman just went with the answer on his card. He isn't a science graduate so how would he know??
not necessarily MRI is an application of NMR so they may wanted the base concept, but yh kinda harsh
@@peterwhiteman2122 In Jeopardy the judges are in Alex's ear so I'm surprised they don't do the same thing here
"it has not particular interest" wtf.... If there's no interest in 1729, then the hell they would be asking.
He was thinking of this... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_number_paradox
Such a nice programme, I wish Spanish TV had any show like that.
I'm shocked that some of these students missed easy questions.
They got Nikola Tesla wrong?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!
I bet they never even watched rick and morty. I’d dance circles around these guys.
Thanks for the video. Could you please make more compilations of science questions in the years after 2014?
they dont recognize tesla...
so smart those guys but thats hurts so very much. damn.
Tesla is irrelevant in science.
Ma2Ju Just like you are in Society.
They didn't know doping , like seriously ?
I almost failed high school physics and I knew that.
It is enough to watch all numberphile videos to answer all math question in this program
3blue1brown for the pi squared over 6
were they required to send their people who know the least about the subjects? who doesnt know the geometric mean or ramanujan? 10^(-1)=-10?
U mean - one tenth?
21:45 see, even lingling know the correct answer.
Yeah, but they are under allot of pressure. Its easy to mock their mistakes when you sit at home watching. That said, not knowing about Ramanujan is disgraceful.
Still even under loads of a pressure, I'm pretty sure u can still realize that any number raised to an exponent is essentially positive. So why in the world did he get -10??
Sorry, I'm just a dumbass bug but, I have no idea of that
idiot: it has no particular interest.
Quizmaster: It may not to you, matey!!
FUCK!! Almost died laughing,
(Rant) I have a degree in maths and from personal experience, I think the actual computational maths problems are all around A-level maths/further maths standard, like something you would get in a Cambridge maths interview. Like the linear algebra/ Taylor expansion/elementary probably theory stuff which is further maths. On the other hand the knowledge based questions are pretty specialist (90% from 1st year material with a few harder exceptions) but you don't have to work anything out. The exceptions include the v-e+f=2 Euler equation I learnt in 3rd year discrete maths, and Cauchy, Laplace etc whose names I only got to know in 2nd year. I remember from another episode a question about the Lebesgue/Jordan measure which is definitely 3rd year probability theory. The other things like Mersenne primes, Riemann Hypothesis etc are basic knowledge for all keen high school students wanting to pursue mathematics. Also I managed to answer 4 physics questions from remembering my A-level physics classes, so I think they must be around the same level. This makes me feel much better now since most of the time I don't even understand the questions on the show that's not maths or classical music. But I guess it's manageable for people who study that particular subject. I'm still amazed at how these guys do maths problems so fast under pressure though👍🏼
You heard about Cauchy in your second year for the first time? This dude came up with the foundation of Analysis. If the Mathematics program you attended does not cover Analysis I (including among other topics: construction of the reals, sequences and convergence, (infinite) sums, continuity of functions, differentiation) it has to be a very shitty program.
+Sheldon Cooper I think I meant to say the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (and Laplace transforms), but shortened my point incorrectly. I know that some unis like Oxbridge teach it in first year, but as I did a combined degree we learnt it in 2nd year real analysis.
Also would you like it if I were to call your degree shitty? We are all grown ups so please speak in a civil manner. FYI rankings tell me that my uni is one of the best in the world so I'm pretty sure the courses I took were far from 'shitty'.
+amesakurako: Great writeup, thank you.
+Sheldon Cooper: stop the dumb trolling and get on the University Challenge program to prove what you know in a competitive pressure situation.
A lot of the questions are meant to just be really quick, off the cuff answers. I mean... One of the questions they just sounded off the definition of continuity in a topological space. I can't imagine they've never been exposed to it, I'm guessing it was nerves.
@@ralphinoful Hearing topological space and answering convex or concave means that they are guessing with whatever words they learned in preparation. Convexity has more or less nothing to do with topological spaces (unless you are in a convex topological vector space).
Chonofsky was the most awesome person up there!
The inverse function answer was wrong. X^1/3 - 1 is the right answer but they gave it in the unswapped x and y position which is wrong?
He specified ‘written as a function of y’
the fact that they weren't using any paper and pen brings me headache wtf
They don't know the definition of a continuous function?????
Some of these are pretty difficult but they get the easy ones like secant and Ramanujan wrong XD
These questions were easier than the one given to there younger peers during competitions..
It was actually hardy who thought his cab number was uninteresting, and srivinasa said that it had those properties, or as the story goes, just goes to show these guys who don’t even study maths (most of them) still have heard of these things which I find so impressive, I only came here because I’m a maths student (with a keen interest in physics my diss is on star formation) to see whether I’d get many of them. Seems I’ve forgotten half of my degree already
very very good congradulations all people´s program..
This helps more than school
Good Will Hunting would have slayed this competition.
We need more of these....Please !! :-)
HYPERsemiconductors. WOW.
Electron Muon and Tau, could the answer also lepton? Around 7 mins in
15:39 my god seriously?
I know !!!
Don't go to their universities lmfao
In the first clip... Top right. Frankie Boyle? That you!
Took 3 years but you finally earned a like
That was a great deal of fun, but I have one tiny nit to pick (with the questioners).
"Heisenberg's Cat" doesn't actually say that "the cat is simultaneously dead and alive" (although this is how it is often posed).
Rather, it claims that the cat is _neither_ dead _nor_ alive until the measurement is made.
it was Schrodinger's cat !!
@@adrianwright8685 : Ah, of course. (Duh) I'll change it in the message. Thanks.
This is just a verbal maths/physics text.
How is naming physicists, mathematicians, and chemical symbols based on bible testaments have anything to do math and physics?? I really hope this crap isn't on any exams in universities.
It's just a game bro
Miguel Pena It's not, this is just a game.
hence 'challenge'
Miguel Pena just a game bro
of course its not part of formal tests, but knowing about the history and progression of the topic is valuable and important when learning maths and various branches of the sciences
Awesome compilation! Thank you!
Some of these are way too easy to be university level.
Don't you have a cat to look after?
Peter Westenthaler It’s dead... sort of.
its not meant to be university level questions, rather such a broad variety of questions that it is very difficult even for university students. Also just because you may have answered these, dosen't mean you could compete in this as you need to know many areas (from maths to classical poetry) to even qualify for the team of most unis
These guys are so smart it almost scares me.
I just feel plain stupid watching this.
Hey do you mind uploading episode 10 of episode 44? it's trinity vs st andrews :)
Don't know any of these. I'm just here tryna learn.
so now they can't do basic GCSE indices?
Oh my God. ALFRED NOBEL?? SERIOUSLY?!? THAT'S CLEARLY NIKOLA TESLA
U forget Paul Dirac also.
the close ups are funny
Linear algebra was thrown in the trash.
Eigenvalue, trace, determinant
Some of this is GCSE level, the rest of it is actually so far beyond me
Is there any way you could be persuaded to make more of these, please?
Lots of keyboard warriors in the comments. I also got most of these rights, but when you're filmed and under pressure I guess it's a total different story. By the way science is about being amazed and trying to understand the world around you, it's not a dick size contest. Stop being so full of yourselves
Also, this is angeneral knowledge quiz with the non-science questions edited out. I think a lot of these students are non-STEM.
Uncertainty principle - h divided by speed of light. WOW.
45:40 How the hell do they not know Tesla?
🤯 I agree with you
Maybe when you have such a vast pool of notable scientists stored mentally, selecting the correct answer becomes less trivial than when only knowing the most obvious select few. That, or they be dumb.
to be honest, most of the questions are really simple.
This is actually so much easier than I expected lol
Everyone here in the comments is wondering how they didn't know Ramanujan or Tesla, and I'm over here wondering how the fuck they didn't know the secant question. That's basic high school geometry/trigonometry.
47:04 Also, they did not realize that (m/s)² [velocity squared] does *NOT* give the same units as m/s² × m³ [acceleration times their answer of radius cubed].
How could they not spell isosceles?!
16:00 - “No, it’s the se-- SHE JUST SAID THAT!
These guys at 16:00 didn't know the definition of secant? Thats like basic trig.
must not be maths people, secent etc is only covered a level and above
The maths questions at ~9:40 :D They have no clue what they are talking about lol
more of this please! its great
I got the answer at 3:57, but convex and concave had me dead. Also lmfao @ "hyper semiconductors"
recognising perfect number was really difficult...
That was autistic levels of pattern recognition
5:41 This was a hard one to judge. He said "to the third" which could have been construed as 1/3rd
10:45 What is the magnitude of the electric field inside the spherical shell Q and radius R?
Phillips: "0"
That is an outrageous result that I am still mad about. I can definitely show it numerically, I guess it makes sense numerically, but intuitively it feels so wrong, even though I can literally see the two sides cancelling out.
Edit: The same result is true for gravity, by the way. Oh man, I miss university :(
Lol wtf, none of them could spell Isosceles
Make a chemistry compilation...and/or a maths and physics from different years.
Just gonna say: hapax legonmenon
How can there be a probability of 1 (ie certain to occur) that one of two half-possible events will occur (of two mutually exclusive events, each with only a probability of one half of occurring)? When say there's half a chance that coin A turns up heads when flipped- and half a chance that coin B turns up heads- it's DEFINITELY not certain that one of them will show heads. I must be misinterpreting the question.
He said mutually exclusive events (i.e. events which can't both occur at the same time), and the events you described are not mutually exclusive.
I keep on getting the same answer as the people whenever they get it wrong
5:53 Answer was ln of x but Jeremy counted it correct
5:40 he got it right but gave it in an alternative form
y = (x+1)^3 --> x = crt(y) - 1, there's no alternative, lol
17:40 I think they were still correct!?!?!
How come they know the answers of complex questions but fail on easy ones?
Can someone please explain to me why the answer for the question starting around @24:40 is 3? My very fast guess would have been 0...(not considering negative integers though).
By Bezout's identity, the smallest positive integer that can be written
as 375a + 147b (where a and b are integers) is also the greatest common
factor of 375 and 147. They obviously share 3 and dividing 375 by 3
gives 5 cubed. Since 147 is not divisible by 5 and 375 has no other
prime factors (as 3*5^3 is its prime factorisation), the greatest common
factor must be 3.
Thanks. You are completely right. I missed the point that he said "the smallest *positive* integer".
I can affirm that no one of these guys is majoring maths...
Is it normal for University Challenge to recycle questions? The three follow up questions at 3:09 all appeared four years later in S47 with the exact same three awnsers.
after i thought of the right answer i felt like the smartest person on earth
is this (UCL)programme
directly started from S40? why not other seasons are not found otherwise....
whats the use of this????
entertainment
It pisses me off that they're guessing all the historical figures based on a relatively small set of potential answers. "AN ITALIAN?? UHHH.. GALILEO I GUESS."
"What British philosopher?"
There's only one British philosopher! 😂🤣😂🤣🤣
Some of these are so simple, how are they not getting them?
At 26:12 the guy get's it right but the host says he's wrong. The question had both metres and centimetres and the answer was 10cm but the contestant likely converted to meters (as any physicist would) and said the answer was 1/10 (of a metre) but the answer the host had was 10 (cm). The question didn't say what units to use.
+123string4 No, he didn't get it right. The question begins "In radians per second, ..."
Is it me or the gardiff team at 27:30 seemed like they were waiting for Jesus to come back😂😂😂 deaaad
Surely 5:40 is a perfectly good answer, just with x instead of y as the independent variable.
Edit: I see he said "written as a function of y". Still kinda stupid though.
agreed
The only questions I knew as an engineering student were doping, n-type semiconductors, nibble & Ramanujan haha!
I S O S C E L E S
God damn though at around 8:00 bottom team was annihilating the competition lol