Bankers Box vs Staples vs Amazon Basics (and Light vs. Medium vs. Heavy Duty) File Storage Boxes
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- Get my courses on how to organize here:
timothykenny.c...
Email me about my premium courses at support@timothykenny.com
Get the free Google Sheet with price information, stacking strength, links and more here:
timothykenny.c...
View the playlist where I review other File Boxes:
• Review of Bankers Box ...
-------
Watch this related in-depth review I forgot to mention in the video:
Comparison of FedEx, USPS and UPS Overnight Envelopes, Boxes and Tube
• Comparison of FedEx, U...
-------
Correction:
Bankers Boxes Medium Duty DO in fact have flaps on the box covers that slot into the handle hole and add another layer of padding (and secure the box cover to the box so it's less likely to come off)...unlike the Amazon Basics Medium Duty and the Staples Medium Duty. It also has a taller box cover like the Amazon Medium Duty. The Staples Medium Duty is the only Medium Duty box that has a smaller/shorter box cover.
Get the GSheet here: timothykenny.com/lp/bankers-box-vs-staples-vs-amazon-basics-file-storage-boxes-price-comparison-chart-spreadsheet/
Sir, can we have any coupon code for your udemy courses? Especially for the end game and thinking skills.
You could use the free trial for my membership on my website.
@@timothykenny okay
Thanks :)
I was searching for a comprehensive classification of all human knowledge learned about sir dewey and his classification
My question is that is this classification scientific and rational
While classification of all the information and ideas (discipline, subject ,field of study)
What goes on in the mind of classifier
Does he judge all information without any presumption and baises
And judge it on the basis of logic and empirical evidence
And decide weather or not this information of field of study qualifies to be included in this classification
I read it is a general classification which encompasses entire human knowledge
That is all information including information which are not considered true
Or real in scientific sense
How do classifiers deal with it
They include it or not
Also does ddc or other universal/ general classification scheme cover entire human knowledge
If not perfectly but nearly
Tell me about propaedia also
The outline of whole of human knowledge
Please
This might be useful for the question of objectivity: subjectguides.library.american.edu/c.php?g=1025915&p=7749829
@@timothykenny it does not give satisfactory answer it is too short
Can you please research about it and tell me
Your time and efforts would be appreciated
Thanks
Which of your questions is your highest priority?
@@timothykenny 1. Does controversial or debatable field of studies which does not seem to be tangible and there is no scientific evidence And consensus in academic world finds a place in classification or it does not qualify the criteria to be included in classification of
Ddc , udc etc
2. General classification by definition Said to be cover entire human knowledge (known till now And recorded)
So at what extent this is true
If not perfect then can I say everything significant and relvent in all human knowledge covered in classification
I mean nearly perfect
1. Yes they may go in occult sciences or nec which stands for not elsewhere classified.
2. Yes it’s nearly perfect for lcc and dcc