Monty Python on Letterman, Part 3: 1984
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 11. 2016
- 10. John Cleese: April 3, 1984. Promotes "Privates on Parade."
11. John Cleese: November 27, 1984. Promotes book Families and How to Survive Them.
Part 1, 1982, here: • Video
Part 2, 1983, here: • Monty Python on Letter...
Part 4, 1985, here: • Monty Python on Letter...
Part 5, 1986, here: • Monty Python on Letter...
Part 6, 1988, here: • Monty Python on Letter...
To come:
Monty Python on Late Night, Part 7: 1989
18. Terry Gilliam: February 28, 1989
Monty Python on Late Night, Part 8: 1991
19. Michael Palin: June 28, 1991
Monty Python on Late Night, Part 9: 1992
20. Michael Palin: December 8, 1992
Monty Python on Late Night, Part 10: 1993
21. Michael Palin: April 1, 1993
22. Eric Idle: April 16, 1993
John's voice is at the early stages here of morphing into what it sounds like today (without the cracking).
The last bit was great.
At last the 1984 show!
Uploaded November 30, 2016.
@@dongiller sorry, was referencing the 1948 show
Only 5 years after Fawlty Towers!
"A Fish Called Wanda" would come out four years after this.
Writing something in 1984 and hoping Michael Palin will be in it...
Something smells fishy.
Here's yer hat, what's yer hurry, Mr. Cleese? I still miss those days.
That was a good trick with the umbrella.
at the very end of this clip...dave says 'Explain your book we have 20 seconds'. Isn't that the Proust Interpretation skit? haha
Dark Wave
It is!
Strangling animals, golf & masturbating. :)
It was my first time seeing it.. I was laughing so hard at it! omg too funny.. I have to look up this reference
John knew exactly how to use those 20 seconds.
Her dumping ashes on floor is funny!
many years later Cleese also did a Bank in Poland xD
It's ridiculous how short these interviews are. They have like what, 5 minutes of talk each segment?
John Cleese himself took the piss out of this trend in (old) talk shows in his pre-Python movie, How to Irritate People. Great film, worth a watch. Very young Michael Palin.
That was the late night format in the US. Still is I think. As many as 3 different guests in an hour with skits, music and jokes mixed in. The guests that come at the end of the show are on for a shorter duration than the headliner guests. Monty Python members would be headliners now but maybe not as much back then.
Turbo Flamez No they weren’t really. Monty Python had broken up by then. As John Cleese says he was producing industrial training films. Definitely not a headliner guest at that time. Monty Python had more of a cult following at that time - before they broke back into the mainstream with Spamalot years later
yes . lovely ending . . thank you !
The "Batman Theme"! Sweet!
Good man
Silly, chattering people give you the feeling to be wise. We should feel thankful for the possibility to learn from silly, chattering people. 🍷🎃
John obviously loved Letterman and enjoyed the show.
They're playing Tax Man because George was such good friends with them
I wanna see that ladys trick!
John looks like a thinner Peter Grant!
The pacing of the interview is positively Martian!
john always seems to shrink down below Daves pov. . correction , not the first interview. But other wise those two seem to be like book ends.
Ok. The amount of commercials… Sheesh.
I litterally went and googled the commercial breaks as I was convinced that it was a recurring joke. Where they stop the interview dead “cut to commercial” which is just an image and then come right back. Instead the breaks are real and hyper frequent. Depressing really.
Haha funny seeing Cleese taking a cigarette out of that packet for the old lady and lighting it too. What was her dealio? Was her trick smoking a whole pack in one go or what?
She drank a beer while smoking a cigarette.
@@petermullaney4207 is she Kramer's mother?
What's the title of the clip that was shown of python?
Not clear what you’re asking. All details are in the description that no one reads.
@@dongiller I was talking about the military clip with the drama queen chastising the soldiers.
@@scottspencer6899 Again, details n the description.
@@scottspencer6899 it’s from the movie Privates on Parade
@Don Giller if you took the time to read his question, you’d know that the info was not on your superb description that i took the time to read