Challenges For Salaf ! Imam Abu Hanifa !Imam Malik ! Shaikh Mumtaz Ul Haq ! Imam Shafi! Latest 2021
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 04. 2021
- __________________________________________________________________________
➤ Official Website: rb.gy/sm6xla
➤ Subscribe: czcams.com/channels/KIt.html...
__________________________________________________________________________
We strive to bring authentic knowledge of Islam to our viewers in different languages of scholars in English subtitles .
Learning the Deen is obligatory for all Muslims .
become part of our dawah by subscribing our channel and entitled yourselves for the chain of sadqa e jariya.
JazakhAllah
subscribe our second CZcams Channel :
/ @thestockitnet
#MumtazUlHaq #lmam_Hanifa #LatestReminder #uloom E Quran youtube channel
Mashallah... Proud of u brother...
What Shaikh is Saying after 2 minutes 20 seconds that Abu Hanifa R.A. was saying to other 3 Imams that if you bring a single Hadith against what i have said throw it against the wall NOT to any tom/Dick & harry he was saying to very respectful knowledge Imams So we have to do TAQLEED to any of 4 Imams BUT Abu Hanifa R.A. is a teacher of other 3 Imams.
Well said shyaik jazakallah kheir.
May Allah guide these sufis!!
❤️
May Allah guide you aswell
MaashaAllah. Jazakallah khairan
ive seen this guy in real life he leads the masjid which is near my grandmothers house
We do not blindly follow scholars, we follow the Prophet. Imam Abu Hanifah never asked you to blindly follow him.
Omg you are a genius brother... How come u are born in this generation?? U should have born at the time of prophet... Sad the prophet did not get to see a person smart as you... 😂😂😂
@@Azamkhan-yv5th what do you mean brother?
Thick as wood u salafis.. read ibne taimiyyas majmoo fataawa v 14 pg 263 ..pgs can differ in prints. He mentions 4 mazaahib and destroys the " 5th fiqhi mazhab of Salafism that works under the pretext of blind following " .
Salafis are pure lost
Qarn of shaitaan comes from najd.
He's mistaken!! Hanbali madhhab isn't only in Saudi Arabia.
When you study fiqh you can't ignore the statements of any of the four imams. Additionally, there were up to 8 different madhaab. All of them are based on proofs and evidences.
We do have a choice not be blind followers!! Study the Religion.
He said mainly in Arab, not only.
Omg we found another genius you can study and follow islam 😂😂😂
Read the different opinions and evidences given by your Salafi aulama..
Albani , Ibne Uthaymeen , Bin Baaz differ in their opinions and their ranking of evidences....
Tons of books..Read 1..
الايجاز في بعض ما اختلف فيه الالباني و ابن عثيمين و ابن باز ...
By shaikh Albareek..
Go study you lost Salafis !!!!
@@shehzadrafiq2121 according to salafis 1200 year all the muslim were on SHIRK until ABDULLAH ABBULWAHAB came🤣🤣
@@Azamkhan-yv5th yes that is what I meant by quoting Ibne Taimiyyah cz Ibne Taimiyyah mentions the 4 fiqhi mazhabs but does not mention Salafi mazhab .. Point is the Salafi mazhab was non - existent ..That is what I mean by the arabic text I wrote..
Ie the Salafis were non- existent until recently
Makes sense in this era of confusion from araby salafi scholars. May Allah unite us all, ameen. And those that are consciously doing wrong may Allah bring them back to the straight path ameen.
Ameen
Araby Salafi scholars? Racist!
I love the Shaik and I follow his videos!
@Saleh 832 ❤️
“I saw him (the Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allaah exalt his mention )) moving his index finger, supplicating with it.”
With my highest respects to Imam Abu Hanifa, but most of the followers of his madth hab do otherwise, this is one example that you said no one can bring.
Are you blind ??
Study the extensive ahaadeeth ..
Including the 4 aqwaal of the Fuqahaa of the Hanafiyyah ... get a life Salafis ! U brothers are lost ...
Ummm, I think you meant "Challenge for Salafīs" and not the Salaf, in shā Allāh.
Also, If you're going to shout about a "challenge to Salafīs", then at least have the academic, intellectual, and religious decency to understand the argument you're yelling about how wrong it is and how much you disagree with it.
So, firstly, what jāhil ever said that we shouldn't follow Imām Abū Ḥanīfah, Mālik, Shafi'ī, or Aḥmed? I'm confused by this inference and accusation from the onset.
Ahlus-Sunnah have never said it is not permissible to take from or follow these great Imāms - may Allāh shower them with His Mercy, āmīn. This was never the position of Ahlus-Sunnah, never have Salafīs said this. As a matter of fact, Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhāb himself was a Ḥanbalī, AND he also tied his hands beneath his navel, just FYI. And I can list you a LONG list of scholars from Ahlus-Sunnah who followed a particular Madhhab - at least initially - and no one ever objected to that.
As a matter of fact, the main teacher of Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhāb himself was an INDIAN Scholar by the name of Al-'Allāmah Muḥammad Ḥayāt As-Sindī who was Ḥanafī originally. He learned by seeking knowledg in India and travelling within India, then eventually leaving India and travelling to Shām, visiting Scholars there. Eventually, he left Syria and settled in Madīnah. Where, later, Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhāb met him.
So this uneducated notion that Salafīs are against Madhhabs or following a Madhhab, it's simply incorrect and an over simplification of a position held by all the Imāms of the Salaf.
What Ahlus-Sunnah have always said is that the absolute and unequivocal blind obedience to a Madhhab, even in the presence of what goes against it being made clear (to an individual or a group of individuals) by way of the Qur'ān, Sunnah, and understanding of the first 3 generations of Islam, and the person understands it - and is capable of understanding it - then, that is a sickness and a disease of the heart.
Absolutely no one is telling "Bob" who just became Muslim to open the Qur'ān and a translated copy of Al-Bukhārī and just "figure it out". Even Imām Al-Albānī has clearly stated that there are instances where taqlīd can be binding upon a person, whether they are Scholars or a layperson.
Also, we do not restrict taqlīd to just four schools. Meaning, we tell a layperson that it is permissible for you to make taqlīd of any Muslim Imām that you trust, even if it's just doing what your local Imām does.
But, this doesn't excuse the Muslim from seeking knowledge and trying to uplift themselves from the darkness of ignorance to the Light of Sacred Knowledge. Rather, this should be a life long endeavor.
And, as a matter of fact, learning a Madhhab is recommended and actually the best way to begin that journey. As it is mentioned by dozens of Salafī Scholars.
As for the challenge, then this isn't something hard to prove, the Imāms students themselves who tried their best to strengthen the Madhhab have done most of the work.
Finally, speakers like this end up saying things that are insanely dangerous and incorrect, due to their blind hatred and misinformed notions.
The speaker (may Allāh forgive and guide us and him) literally said there are Ṣaḥīḥ Ḥadīths which are contradictory to each other...? SubhānaAllāh. An absolute and pure lie. No Deobandi, Brelvi, or Salafī would ever utter that type of speech. Again, I'll give the excuse that the speaker was just being agitated by his anger and hatred to not be aware of what he was saying. Nonetheless, a heavy and grave error and statement.
Also, his claim that ALL the acceptable interpretations have been encompassed by the 4 Madhhabs - who proceeded him in this? Then, we should just burn all the books of Ḥadīth and just hold on to "Ta'leemul-Haqq" (if you know, you know) and call it a day, right?
And how would the Fuqahā know what to base the Sunnah on if not for these narrations being verified and checked by Scholars of Ḥadīth. And if a Faqīh did base a ruling on a weak or fabricated narration that they believed was authentic, do we still just blindly say, "Oh he must've known!" Even if the Ḥadīth collections weren't spread and made prevalent in the Ummah until almost a 100 years after his death?!
So, challenge has been accepted and refuted more times than can be counted with out getting bored or tired. In Arabic and in English.
BārakaAllāhu fīkum wa jazākumAllāhu khayran.
MashAllah well done explain and finding the truth never cause a fitnah and people dont understand that being part of ehli - sunnah wel- xhemat means to follow 4 great imams but just not blindy way because everyone makes mistakes
Blind following leads to ghuloo.. A sickness very dreadful
@Abul-layth Ziyad MashaAllah brother beautiful explaination .Keep sharing valuable knowledge
@Faiz Ahmad Indeed brother
MashaAllah great explanation akhi, Allah yehfzak w yehmik inshallah
Salaams
MA Shaa ALLAH. Finally a reasonable scholar! BTW the people who need to hear this lecture will not hear it because of the stupid sad melody in the background, just saying.
JazakhAllah
❤️
What about the hanafi school of thought allowing marriage for a women without a gaurdian? Where is the evidence from Quran and sunnah for this? Rather we have clear evidence and saheeh ahadith contradicting this
❤️
Actually, hanafi school allows the thayib to marry herself , thayib is a women who has already been in sexual relation, but the bikr wich is a virgin basically is not allowed to marry without a waliy in hanafi fiqh, so i dont whete do you get your misconception from.
@@mamadoufarissou7312 he just asked for the evidence, or do you follow opinion without evidence
@@mamadoufarissou7312 As-Salam 'alaikum brother. If you read and understand Arabic, then I suggest you look in some of the principle books of Hanafis. You will find that the "mash-hūr" (something like default, literally meaning "most known"/"famous") position of the Madhhab is that a woman can marry herself, whether she is "Thayyib" or "Bikr" - the allowance is just more clear for a "Thayyib".
I myself have seen Hanafi Maulanas marry women without the permission of their parents, and have caused much trauma and discord within families by doing so. All the while, hiding behind their Madhhab.
Now, this doesn't mean that the Madhhab is to blame, but, nonetheless, it's position is used to defend such behavior.
Of course, many Hanafi Scholars - including students of Imām Abū Hanīfah - refuted this position when the Hadīth came to them, walhamdulillāh.
Others chose to be fanatical. And therein lies the problem of unrestricted, unconditional taqlīd.
@@AbooLayth wa alaikoum salam brother, first and foremost we should understand that even if we have a hadith it doesnt mean we should take it as sunnah, because there are criterias as to reject some ahadith, even sahih ones, imam malik rahimahullah used to reject some ahadith and not work upon them.
Second the mashhour of the hanafi fiqh wich i took from alazhar institute is that the thayib has the right to marry herself, not only abu hanifah says this, awzaii, shuubi, azzuhri also agree on this because of another hadith that allows it , narrated in muslim : the ayyim ( means the celibate women) has the right upon herself better than the wali and the bikr is asked permission, and her permission is her silence.
Therefore from a hadith stand point, abu hanifa rahimahullah has all the right to issue the fatwa even though later hanafi rectified that. So it is not blind taqlid, it is based on evidence, wa alhamdulillah, our religion is vast and comprehensive.
Wow who is this guy, he is amazing. May Allah preserve him and his likes.
Moulana mumtaz ul haq
Incredible, I love Shaykhs speeches
❤️
For Godsake For Allah's sake don't misled ummah in the name of taqleed. The sunnah is the way sahaba followed Hazrat Muhammadur Rasool Allah Salal laahu alaihi wasallam.
So what do you mean is that the The 4 imams Rehmatullah Taala alaihim ajmaeen are not prone to mistake.
You should stop it there.
❤️
You didn't get the point!
He didn't say they are Masoomeen.
He said if you don't follow the 4 imaams you would be force to follow another imaams.
I think the better statement would be "an individual, reading hadith and applying them, themselves, is prone to making mistakes"
Brothers , when you see an imam is dead wrong, do you follow him?
I don't.
Lol 'dead wrong' based on what? Your ijtihad?
Good question
@@hassanabdaladl Base on evidence from Quran and Sunnah.
@@getinspired7687 lol you don't base your evidence on the Qur'an and sunnah. You base your evidence on some ahadith that you hear/read from certain sources and blind follow them lol. That's not "Qur'an and sunnah". Most people who say that kind of stuff, haven't even read the Qur'an once
how do we trust your understanding and take against the Mujtahid's you are shooting down ? do you follow another Mujtahid on that issue you or you are following your own 'hawa' whim opinion take and think it qualifies? that is a slippery slope to chaos and anarchy and Daesh like or Zakir Naik self-made mufti or Irshad manji type self-made kufti mufti fatwa going against the established Fiqh schools and against its UsulelFiqh (thus against the Quran and Sunnah) interpretations to name a few, each one quoting from Quran and Hadeeth Saheeh!
Brother , asSalaam 3laikom.
Taqlid is not something strange. It is what we do in every aspect of our life. We make taqlid when we go to the expert counselor's for advice, be they doctors, architects, structural engineers, lawyers. do you know what the criteria of AbuHanifa's was in accepting a hadeeth? perhaps it was even more stringent than AlBukhari's due to the condition of those living in Iraq vs those living in Madinah and Makkah. how about you check with your local Hanafi / Shafi / Maliki / Hanbali faqih (on the same line with Sheikh Mohammed AbdilWahid alHanbali ) from your local or community Masjid. Meet up with one or two and put your doubts across to them and see if they guide you on it and answer accordingly to your condition and the matter of inquiry.
Shouting and raising your voice does not prove an argument. Hanafi is not a hadith, but also a denial of the Qur'an. Child's nursing is 2 years in Quran but according to Imam Abu Hanifa it is 2 and a half years. Who do you believe now?
Shaikh Ulislam ,
Ahmad Ibne Taimiyyah , the scholar the Salafis really look upto has said in vol 14 pg 263 the following...
معلوم ان اهل المذاهب كالحنفية و المالكية و الشافعية و الحنبلية دينهم واحد و منهم من اطاع الله ورسوله كان مؤمنا سعيدا باتفاق المسلمين ....
A slap on the Salafis' faces....
Where is their " 5th Mazhab " mentioned ?
Ibne Taimiyyah has mentioned the 4 fiqhi mazaahib as the muslims and as 1 religion and whoever follows them is A FORTUNATE BELIEVER...
Salafis !
May Allah taala guide you !
Aameen
i think this sheikh are hanafi. what he mean by salafi? he calling for taklid that means ignorance. please answer me, if people flow any one scholars, why need islamic education, different department from different university. why you study, why mohaddis warks day and night.
close all islamic education system and bye a fiqh book then aply it. its alll.
im from bangladesh. i accept your challenge. i will prove every school of thought have lots of example their fiqh completely anti whith shahi hadith.
what you think, bukhari muslim are shahi or not.
Brother , asSalaam 3laikom.
Taqlid is not something strange. It is what we do in every aspect of our life. We make taqlid when we go to the expert counselor's for advice, be they doctors, architects, structural engineers, lawyers. do you know what the criteria of AbuHanifa's was in accepting a hadeeth? perhaps it was even more stringent than AlBukhari's due to the condition of those living in Iraq vs those living in Madinah and Makkah. how about you check with your local Hanafi faqih from Kakrail Masjid or HaatHazari. Meet up with one or two and put your doubts across to them and see if they guide you on it and answer accordingly to your condition and the matter of inquiry.
The fuqaha will be the fuel of hell
❤️
Lmaooomad salafi
@@MultiFusko Salafī? How? Don't be ignorant, bārakaAllāhu fīkum.
Just to clarify, these scholars are deobandi salafis from Indian subcontinent. They are inspired by wahhabis.
I'm a sufi muslim.
@@amiryaz5728 Not all deobandis are salafi. There are deobandis who adhere to Tasawwuf and it's tariqaat